Storage and Packaging Studies on Degermed Maize Flour
Loading...
Date
2000-06
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Ghana
Abstract
degermed maize flour (control). The
percentage fat, ash, and fiber content were 1.42 } 0.34, 0.2 } 0.03, and 0.51
} 0.01 respectively for degenned maize flour and 6.02 } 0.63, 1.51 } 0.16,
and 1.84 } 0.05 for non-degenned flour. Carbohydrate content was relatively
higher (79.96%) in degenned maize flour than in the non-degermed maize
flour which was 74.14% as a result of germ and hull.
The moisture sorption isotherm of degermed maize flour (DF) and nondegermed
maize flour (nDF) followed a type (II) isotherm pattern
(Labuza,1984). The water absorption pattern of DF and nDF in relation to
the various Water Activities (Aw) was higher for DF as compared to nDF at
Aw between 0.11 to 0.71 indicating that the DF is more hygroscopic. DF
showed a higher monolayer value of 3 .9g/l 00 solid matter as compared to
nDF which was 2.98 g/100 solid matter. The heat of sorption of DF and nDF
decreased with increasing moisture concentration. But at low Aw ranging
from 0.11 to 0.44 the total heat of sorption of nDF is higher than that o f DF.
Water vapor permeability test conducted on packaging materials used,
showed that low Density Polyethylene has a higher water vapor transmission
rate than Polypropylene (PP) and High Density (HD) which had s imilar
rates. The initial moisture content of the flour samples ranged between
10.39 } 0.49% (solar dried sample) and 10.74 } 0.87% (Oven dried sample)
for nDF, and 11.0 } 0.6 % (solar dried sample) and 10.57 } 0.78 % (Oven
dried sample) for DF when packaged in HD and PP packaging materials and
stored at 29 } 1°C. After.six months storage period, the final moisture
content attained by both flour samples were between 10.63 } 0.63 % (Solar
dried sample) and 12.61 } 0.77% (Oven dried sample) for nDF and 12.37 }
0.31% (Oven dried sample) and 11.27 } 0.48% (solar dried sample) for DF.
These values are less than 13% moisture standard set for the storage of
cereal flour (Kent, et al., 1970). After 6 months storage the non-degermed
maize flour samples showed high percentage free fatty acid content (0.54 }
00 %) as compared to degermed maize flour samples (0.44 } 00 %) owing to
the initial differences of fat content of the flour samples.
Based on the results obtained it can be concluded that degermed maize flour
can be stored for at least 6 months or longer with minimal changes in
quality; and that the degermed maize flour has a higher potential for storage
than the non-degermed maize flour.
Description
Thesis (MPhil) - University of Ghana, 2000