Predicting the course of Alzheimer’s progression

dc.contributor.authorIddi, S.
dc.contributor.authorLi, D.
dc.contributor.authorAisen, P.S.
dc.contributor.authorRafii, M.S.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, W.K.
dc.contributor.authorDonohue, M.C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-09T13:48:15Z
dc.date.available2019-09-09T13:48:15Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-17
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractAlzheimer’s disease is the most common neurodegenerative disease and is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-beta peptides leading to the formation of plaques and tau protein tangles in brain. These neuropathological features precede cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s dementia by many years. To better understand and predict the course of disease from early-stage asymptomatic to late-stage dementia, it is critical to study the patterns of progression of multiple markers. In particular, we aim to predict the likely future course of progression for individuals given only a single observation of their markers. Improved individual-level prediction may lead to improved clinical care and clinical trials. We propose a two-stage approach to modeling and predicting measures of cognition, function, brain imaging, fluid biomarkers, and diagnosis of individuals using multiple domains simultaneously. In the first stage, joint (or multivariate) mixed-effects models are used to simultaneously model multiple markers over time. In the second stage, random forests are used to predict categorical diagnoses (cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment, or dementia) from predictions of continuous markers based on the first-stage model. The combination of the two models allows one to leverage their key strengths in order to obtain improved accuracy. We characterize the predictive accuracy of this two-stage approach using data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The two-stage approach using a single joint mixed-effects model for all continuous outcomes yields better diagnostic classification accuracy compared to using separate univariate mixed-effects models for each of the continuous outcomes. Overall prediction accuracy above 80% was achieved over a period of 2.5 years. The results further indicate that overall accuracy is improved when markers from multiple assessment domains, such as cognition, function, and brain imaging, are used in the prediction algorithm as compared to the use of markers from a single domain only.en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-019-0099-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/32101
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringerOpenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries;2019
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseaseen_US
dc.subjectBiomakersen_US
dc.subjectClassification Clinical diagnosisen_US
dc.subjectDisease trajectoriesen_US
dc.subjectJoint mixed-effects modelsen_US
dc.subjectLatent time shiften_US
dc.subjectModel averagingen_US
dc.subjectMulti-level Bayesian modelsen_US
dc.subjectMulti-cohort longitudinal dataen_US
dc.subjectPredictionsen_US
dc.subjectRandom foresten_US
dc.titlePredicting the course of Alzheimer’s progressionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Predicting_the_course_of_Alzheimers_progression.pdf
Size:
4.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: