Comparative joint position error in patients with non-specific neck disorders and asymptomatic age-matched individuals

dc.contributor.authorQuartey, J.
dc.contributor.authorErnst, M.
dc.contributor.authorBello, A.
dc.contributor.authorOppong-Yeboah, B.
dc.contributor.authorBonney, E.
dc.contributor.authorAcquaah, K.
dc.contributor.authorAsomaning, F.
dc.contributor.authorFoli, M.
dc.contributor.authorAsante, S.
dc.contributor.authorSchaemann, A.
dc.contributor.authorBauer, C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-10T13:02:54Z
dc.date.available2019-12-10T13:02:54Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-27
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Neck pain is a common complaint worldwide and ranked seventh in 2010 as the cause of ‘years lived with disability’ in Ghana. Proprioceptive dysfunction, measured by joint position error (JPE) tests, indicates an association with neck pain frequency, dizziness and balance problems in patients. Objectives: To examine proprioceptive deficits of the neck using a laser pointer attached to the head. Methods: Twenty patients within the age group 21–60 years, with at least five points on the neck disability index (NDI), and 20 age- and sex-matched controls with less than five points on the NDI were recruited for this study. The JPE was determined wearing a headlight laser pointer directed towards a Cartesian coordinate system adjusted to x/y = 0/0, placed on a wall after returning from left and right rotation, flexion and extension. From starting in an upright sitting position, facing the Cartesian coordinate system, each participant performed five repetitions for each movement direction. The mean of five repetitions for each movement direction was calculated as absolute error (AE), constant error (CE) and variable error (VE). Results: Control participants showed larger JPE values for nearly all AE, CE and VE. After repositioning from flexion controls showed an approximately 0.6 ° larger median JPE, and the opposite for extension, with median differences between 1 ° and 2 °. Conclusion: The results of this study do not reveal any meaningful differences between patients with mild disabled neck movement compared with controls. Clinical implications: Joint position error testing does not seem useful for patients with mild neck disability.en_US
dc.identifier.citationQuartey, J., Ernst, M., Bello, A., Oppong-Yeboah, B., Bonney, E., Acquaah, K., et al., 2019, ‘Comparative joint position error in patients with non-specific neck disorders and asymptomatic agematched individuals’, South African Journal of Physiotherapy 75(1), a568. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp. v75i1.568en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.4102/sajp. v75i1.568
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/34092
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth African Journal of Physiotherapyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries75;1
dc.subjectjoint position erroren_US
dc.subjectproprioceptiveen_US
dc.subjectneck disabilityen_US
dc.subjectage-matcheden_US
dc.subjectneck disability indexen_US
dc.subjectsex-matcheden_US
dc.titleComparative joint position error in patients with non-specific neck disorders and asymptomatic age-matched individualsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparative-joint-position-error-in-patients-with-nonspecific-neck-disorders-and-asymptomatic-agematched-individualsSouth-African-Journal-of-Physiotherapy.pdf
Size:
873.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: