Risk factors in wound infection following urologic operations: a prospective study.
| dc.contributor.author | Taha, S.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sayed, A.A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Grant, C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Twum-Danso, K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wosornu, L. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-14T15:23:41Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-19T12:15:31Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-06-14T15:23:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-10-19T12:15:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1992-04 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A total of 134 urologic operations were studied prospectively for postoperative wound infection, the methodology involving direct intraoperative swab taking. Patients' variables were (mean +/- SD): age 32.4 +/- 20.7 years, Quetelet index 27.4 +/- 8, duration of operation 98 +/- 34 minutes, and male:female ratio 9.3:1. Of the 131 intraoperative swabs 28 (21%) were positive, 97% of the organisms being aerobic; 16% of the patients were nasal carriers of S. aureus. The overall wound infection rate was 9%, and it prolonged hospital stay by six days average. Significant risk factors (and their magnitude) were: age over 60 years (x 2.2), prolonged preoperative hospital stay (x 15), and wound contamination (x 4.3 and x 14.3 for classes 3 and 4 wounds respectively). Neither diabetes mellitus, obesity, nor surgeon's rank was contributory. We conclude that, although the 9% rate of postoperative wound infection was acceptable, appropriate prophylactic antibiotics may reduce it further, and, from our data, we would recommend an aminoglycoside (e.g. Amikacin) and Ampicillin combined. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://197.255.68.203/handle/123456789/3178 | |
| dc.publisher | PubMed | en_US |
| dc.title | Risk factors in wound infection following urologic operations: a prospective study. | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
