Diagnosing constraints to market participation of small ruminant producers in northern Ghana: An innovation systems analysis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAmankwah, K.
dc.contributor.authorKlerkx, L.
dc.contributor.authorOosting, S.J.
dc.contributor.authorSakyi-Dawson, O.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Zijpp, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorMillar, D.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-12T16:27:11Z
dc.date.available2018-11-12T16:27:11Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-10
dc.descriptionJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper assesses why participation in markets for small ruminants is relatively low in northern Ghana by analysing the technical and institutional constraints to innovation in smallholder small ruminant production and marketing in Lawra and Nadowli Districts. The results show that the limitations experienced by smallholders, i.e., water shortages during the dry season, high mortality and theft of livestock, persist because of institutional constraints. These include structural limitations related to availability of arable lands, weak support systems for animal production and health services delivery, community values that are skewed towards crop production more than animal husbandry, ineffective traditional and formal structures for justice delivery, and gaps in the interaction between communities and district and national level organizations such as the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, district assemblies, rural banks, and non-governmental organizations as well as traders and butchers. Confronted with such constraints, the strategies that most smallholders have adopted to be resilient entail diversified sources of livelihood, low input use in small ruminant production, and maintaining the herd as a capital stock and insurance. Only a few smallholders (i.e., ‘positive deviants’) engage in market or demand-driven production or exhibit successful strategies in small ruminant husbandry. It is argued in this paper that for the majority of smallholders, market production, which requires high levels of external inputs or intensification of resource use, is not a viable option. The main implications of the study are (1) that other institutional constraints than market access constraints should be addressed, (2) that commercial livestock production should not be idealized as the best or only option (as is being done in many contemporary interventions that aim at incorporating smallholders into commodity value chains), and (3) that different types of small ruminant system innovation pathways should be explored by making use of local positive deviants.en_US
dc.identifier.citationK. Amankwah et al. / NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 60– 63 (2012) 37– 47en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2012.06.002
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/25477
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries60;63
dc.subjectLivestock marketsen_US
dc.subjectTechno-institutional constraintsen_US
dc.subjectInnovation systemsen_US
dc.subjectGhanaen_US
dc.titleDiagnosing constraints to market participation of small ruminant producers in northern Ghana: An innovation systems analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Amankwah-K_Diagnosing-constraints-to-market-participation-of-small-ruminant-producers-in-northern-Ghana-An-innovation-systems-analysisOpen-Access_2012.pdf
Size:
395.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Department of Agricultural Extension