Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review

dc.contributor.authorCarr, S.E.
dc.contributor.authorNoya, F.
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, B.
dc.contributor.authorHarris, A.
dc.contributor.authorScott, K.
dc.contributor.authorHooker, C.
dc.contributor.authorMavaddat, N.
dc.contributor.authorAni‑Amponsah, M.
dc.contributor.authorVuillermin, D.M.
dc.contributor.authorReid, S.
dc.contributor.authorBrett‑MacLean, P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T09:33:47Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T09:33:47Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The articulation of learning goals, processes and outcomes related to health humanities teaching currently lacks comparability of curricula and outcomes, and requires synthesis to provide a basis for developing a curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities teaching and learning. This scoping review sought to answer how and why the health humanities are used in health professions education. It also sought to explore how health humanities curricula are evaluated and whether the programme evaluation aligns with the desired learning outcomes. Methods: A focused scoping review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies that included the influence of integrated health humanities curricula in pre-registration health professions education with programme evaluate of outcomes was completed. Studies of students not enrolled in a pre-registration course, with only ad-hoc health humanities learning experiences that were not assessed or evaluated were excluded. Four databases were searched (CINAHL), (ERIC), PubMed, and Medline. Results: The search over a 5 year period, identified 8621 publications. Title and abstract screening, followed by fulltext screening, resulted in 24 articles selected for inclusion. Learning outcomes, learning activities and evaluation data were extracted from each included publication. Discussion: Reported health humanities curricula focused on developing students’ capacity for perspective, reflexivity, self- reflection and person-centred approaches to communication. However, the learning outcomes were not consistently described, identifying a limited capacity to compare health humanities curricula across programmes. A set of clearly stated generic capabilities or outcomes from learning in health humanities would be a helpful next step for benchmarking, clarification and comparison of evaluation strategy.en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03002-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/37157
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMC Medical Educationen_US
dc.subjectHealth professions educationen_US
dc.subjectMedical Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectHealth Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectCurriculum evaluationen_US
dc.subjectScoping reviewen_US
dc.titleHealth Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Health-Humanities-curriculum-and-evaluation-in-health-professions-education-a-scoping-reviewBMC-Medical-Education.pdf
Size:
1.21 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: