Comparison of Decontamination Methods for Isolation of Mycobacterium Species from the Environment

dc.contributor.authorZuliehatu, N
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-03T17:03:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-13T17:00:47Z
dc.date.available2016-11-03T17:03:04Z
dc.date.available2017-10-13T17:00:47Z
dc.date.issued2014-03
dc.description.abstractThe environment harbours many bacterial species, some of which include non-tuberculous mycobacteria which have recently become important in public health. Isolation of mycobacteria from the environment has not been easy because of the presence of other fast growing bacteria and fungi. For isolation of mycobacteria from the environment, decontamination methods that minimize contamination but maximize recovery of mycobacteria are needed. This study sought to compare three decontamination methods for isolation of mycobacteria from the environment. Sixty-five samples were collected from both Buruli ulcer disease endemic and non-endemic villages. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done to detect the biomarker IS2404 as a first screening procedure. Direct microscopy was performed on the IS2404 positive samples and three decontamination methods were evaluated, namely; 4% NaOH/ 5% simplified OA method, 0.3% malachite green/ 0.75 g/50 ml cycloheximide/ 4% NaOH and 3% SDS/ 4% NaOH decontamination methods. Three different media with antibiotic supplementation and one without antibiotic supplementation were used for isolation of mycobacteria from the environment. Thirty-seven out of the 65 samples were positive for IS2404 marker and 5/37(13.5%) were acid-fast positive. Decontamination by NaOH/OA method gave the highest number of total tubes that confirmed mycobacterial growth (42/91, 46.1 %) and the least contamination. The medium containing PANTA-mycobactin-J (PM) was best among the four media used. Isolates obtained from this study were identified by Hain GenoType CM® line probe assay. Forty-four Mycobacterium species were identified and Mycobacterium chelonae was the most frequently isolated species. Decontamination with 4% sodium hydroxide/5% oxalic acid and L-J medium containing PANTA and mycobactin J (PM) were the most efficient in supporting the growth of mycobacteria and may be used as standard for isolating mycobacteria from the environment.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.255.68.203/handle/123456789/8897
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Ghanaen_US
dc.subjectCOMPARISONen_US
dc.subjectDECONTAMINATIONen_US
dc.subjectMETHODSen_US
dc.subjectISOLATIONen_US
dc.subjectMYCOBACTERIUMen_US
dc.subjectSPECIESen_US
dc.subjectENVIRONMENTen_US
dc.titleComparison of Decontamination Methods for Isolation of Mycobacterium Species from the Environmenten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison of Decontamination Methods for Isolation of Mycobacterium Species from the Environment _ 2014.pdf
Size:
6.49 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.82 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: