Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men
dc.contributor.author | Sheikh, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sinan, T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kehinde, E.O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hussein, A.Y.T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Anim, J.T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Al-Hunayan, A.A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-25T21:29:31Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-19T12:36:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-06-25T21:29:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-19T12:36:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-03 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: This study was conducted to determine the utility of digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men in Arabia, an are of the world with a relatively low incidence of this disease. Patients and methods: 329 patients suspected of having prostate cancer on account of raised serum PSA level (> 4 ng/ml), DRE or TRUS findings, underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Raised PSA individually as well as combined, or a lesion suspicious of carcinoma on DRE or TRUS was recorded as PSA (+), DRE (+) or TRUS (+), respectively. The contribution of DRE, TRUS and serum PSA to the diagnosis of prostate cancer was analysed. Results: Of the 329 patients who had prostate biopsies 109 cases (33.1%) had PCa. Of these 109 patients 56 (51 %) had DRE (+), 77 (42%) had TRUS (+) and 49 (66%) had both DRE (+) and TRUS (+). Statistical analysis revealed that DRE (+) tripled the probability for cancer. PSA over a range of 10-50 ng/mL demonstrated an increasing cancer probability ranging from 2 to 3 fold. TRUS (+) was only significantly associated with cancer risk if PSA was elevated. The presence of all three factors increased the cancer probability by 6 to 7 fold. Conclusion: TRUS findings are dependent on PSA for interpretation while DRE (+) with elevated PSA makes PCa more likely. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Sheikh, M., Sinan, T., Kehinde, E. O., Hussein, A. Y. T., Anim, J. T., & Al-Hunayan, A. A. (2007). Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 27(2), 73-78. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 02564947 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://197.255.68.203/handle/123456789/4148 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Annals of Saudi Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject | Arabs | en_US |
dc.subject | Digital Rectal Examination | en_US |
dc.subject | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject | Male | en_US |
dc.subject | Mass Screening | en_US |
dc.subject | Predictive Value of Tests | en_US |
dc.subject | Prostate-Specific Antigen | en_US |
dc.subject | Prostatic Neoplasms | en_US |
dc.title | Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |