Comparison of patient radiation dose from chest and lumbar spine X-ray examinations in 10 hospitals in Ghana.

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2012-05

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Published by Oxford University Press

Abstract

This study estimated the patient dose in chest and lumbar spine radiographic examinations in 10 hospitals in Ghana. Dose estimations were done on 1045 patients (aged, 39.6 ± 10.6 y; range 18-85 y) involving 501 (47.9 %) males and 544 (52.1 %) females for a total of 1495 individual projections. The entrance surface dose (ESD) for the patients was assessed by an indirect method, using the patient's anatomical data and exposure parameters utilised for the specific examination and a Quality Assurance Dose Database software developed by Integrated Radiological Services Ltd in Liverpool, UK. The study showed variations in the ESDs for chest examinations with five of the hospitals having values above the internationally recommended levels. ESDs for lumbar spine anterior-posterior and lateral projections were within acceptable limits. Diagnostic reference levels proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection based on patient dose data are imperative to the current Ghanaian situation and will lead to a reduction of the radiation dose. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press.

Description

Keywords

EMTREE medical terms: adult; aged; article; comparative study; computer program; factual database; female; Ghana; hospital; human; lumbar vertebra; male; methodology; middle aged; radiation dose; radiation monitoring; radiography; thorax radiography; X ray, MeSH: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Databases, Factual; Female; Ghana; Hospitals; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Middle Aged; Radiation Dosage; Radiation Monitoring; Radiography, Thoracic; Software; X-Rays

Citation

Ofori, E. K., Antwi, W. K., Arthur, L., & Duah, H. (2012). Comparison of patient radiation dose from chest and lumbar spine X-ray examinations in 10 hospitals in Ghana. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 149(4), 424-430.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By