International Relations in Africa: not without Indigenous Knowledge Systems
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
International Theory
Abstract
The field of International Relations (IR) has come under increasing and sustained criticism
for producing and disseminating a particular reading of European history, one rooted in
violence, as if it were universal knowledge.Generations ofstudents,academics,practitioners,
and policymakers have been taught and socialized into accepting this violent historical
experience as the norm and, implicitly, as a reflection of human nature. As a result, the
dominant accounts of IR tend to foreground competitive, conflictual, domineering, power
seeking, and exploitative behaviours as defining features of international life. This under
standing of IR marginalizes and often ignores Indigenous ways of knowing that emphasize
relationality, solidarity, mutual care, and cooperative forms of social organization. In this
article, we argue that centring Afrocentric Indigenous Knowledge Systems (AIKS), particu
larly their conceptualizations of persons in IR scholarship, has the potential to move the
field beyond its bleak and violent roots towards a more humane and relationalepistemology.
The AIKS-centred approach to IR is better suited to capturing the nuances of contemporary
global life while speaking to the lived experiences of Africans and potentially other Indi
genous peoples around the world.
Description
Research Article
Citation
Namakula-Mayanja, E., & Yakohene, A. B. (2026). International Relations in Africa: not without Indigenous knowledge systems. International Theory, 18(2), 274-290.
