Development of a Culturally Competent Behaviour Change Intervention Framework to Enhance Utilisation of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services among Rural- Urban Migrant Adolescents in the Greater Accra Region, Ghana
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Ghana
Abstract
Purpose: The thesis addresses the gap in culturally competent behaviour change interventions to
improve sexual and reproductive health service (ASRH) utilisation among rural and urban
migrant adolescents in Ghana.
Methodology: It employed intervention development design using a mixed-methods approach.
Guided by the COM-B model and Campinha-Bacote’s cultural competence theory, the study
engaged healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in ASRH facilities and migrant adolescents
utilising services as well as gatekeepers and peers in the Greater Accra Region from 2022 to
2023. A criterion purposive sampling technique was first employed to select the healthcare
facilities (HCF). Subsequently, convenience sampling was used to select the HCPs and the
migrant adolescents within the catchment area of the target health facilities. The study was
conducted in 3 phases. In Phase 1, a qualitative research approach was used to understand
problematic behaviours of migrant adolescents regarding current pathways for health-seeking
and cultural competence of HCPs using behavioural analysis. In total, 25 participants took part in
the study after which saturation was reached. This included 10 migrant adolescents, 8 HCPs, 3
gatekeepers, and 4 migrant peers. Following this, through a process of mapping and distillation,
the Behaviour change wheel (BCW)framework was used to guide a systematic process of
identifying potential culturally competent intervention functions and their corresponding
behaviour change techniques (BCTs) drawn from the BCW taxonomy BCTTv1 and
supplemented with relevant literature. Phase 2 involved a Delphi study conducted among 10
experts to validate behaviour change techniques (BCTs); ratings for feasibility, acceptability,
effectiveness, and risk of harm were analysed to establish a consensus (>/=70%). Experts were
also asked to provide feedback on the appropriateness of the identified implementation strategies
and mode of delivery. Phase 3 involved preliminary testing of the cultural acceptability and
feasibility of implementation strategy and delivery mode among migrants and HCPs in a
workshop to refine the intervention framework. Findings: The behavioural analysis conducted in
Phase 1 revealed the following explanatory factors that are amenable to behaviour change:
mistrust, communication barriers at the migrant level, and lack of cultural competency at the
HCP level. For each of these, the BCTs identified included nonspecific reward, removing
aversive stimuli, restructuring the social environment at the migrant adolescent level., and
instructions on how to perform the behaviour at the HCP level. In Phase 2, experts rated BCTs as
appropriate: feasible (4.6 [SD=0.7; 3-5]); acceptable (4.5 [SD=0.7; 3-5]); effective (4.4 [SD=1.2;
1-5]), and risk of harm 4.0 [SD=1.3; 2-5], indicating low risk of harm. At the migrant adolescent
level, the experts rated the BCTs as: feasible (4.3 [SD=0.5; 4-5]); acceptable (4.1 [SD=0.7; 3-5]);
effective (4.1 [SD=0.7; 3-5]); and risk of harm (4.0 [SD=0.8; 3-5]), indicating low risk of harm.
In the final phase of the framework development, the validated BCTs were operationalised into
behaviour change strategies, which were then tested among the experts. Suggestions emerged
regarding who to implement the strategies and the need to highlight the importance of providing
training that emphasises skills and mastery experiences. These suggestions were integrated into
the final content. To ensure that these strategies and delivery options are culturally appropriate
and effectively address both demand-side barriers and facilitators, the users emphasised the
importance of taking contextual factors into account, which were integrated in order to inform
the intervention framework development. Conclusion: The behaviour change-informed
framework served as a conceptual model of the mechanisms of behaviour change and a practical
guide to the implementation of strategies to enhance the utilisation of ASRH among migrant
adolescents pending further testing in a future study.
Description
PhD. Public Health
