Journal of Intra-African Studies No. 3 pp 47-64

dc.contributor.authorAnamzoya Alhassan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-01T13:11:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-14T14:20:12Z
dc.date.available2013-01-01T13:11:10Z
dc.date.available2017-10-14T14:20:12Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractUsing case studies from Botswana, South Africa and Nigeria, this paper argues that institutionalized chieftaincy in Ghana currently enjoys more leverage than those in other African countries. The attempt here is not so much to offer reasons explaining the resilience (the why) of chieftaincy in Africa, but how traditional authorities have been incorporated into the modern state. Beyond this, this paper uses the Ghanaian example of institutionalized chieftaincy (The Houses of Chiefs system) to show how the chieftaincy institution which is largely a non-rational institution and lacks legitimacy, has gradually become bureaucratic and legitimate. More significantly, this paper reveals that whilst the role of institutionalized chieftaincy in Africa is reducing significantly, in judicial administration, institutionalized chieftaincy in Ghana is rather increasing in significance. The objective of this paper is realized through a combination of many methods; primary documents such as constitutions and courts acts, observations, interviews, and secondary material from books and articles.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Intra-African Studies No. 3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.255.68.203/handle/123456789/2139
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of History and Archaeology, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida Universityen_US
dc.titleJournal of Intra-African Studies No. 3 pp 47-64en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.82 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: