Response to the Letter to the Editor by Eberhard et al.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBottomley, C.
dc.contributor.authorIsham, V.
dc.contributor.authorVivas-Martínez, S.
dc.contributor.authorKuesel, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorAttah, S.K.
dc.contributor.authorOpoku, N.O.
dc.contributor.authorLustigman, S.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, M.
dc.contributor.authorBasáñez, M.-G.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-31T11:27:22Z
dc.date.available2019-07-31T11:27:22Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractIn a Letter to the Editor, Eberhard et al. question the validity of our model of skin snip sensitivity and argue against the use of skin snips to evaluate onchocerciasis elimination by mass drug administration. Here we discuss their arguments and compare model predictions with observed data to assess the validity of our model. © 2017 The Author(s).en_US
dc.identifier.othervol.10(1)
dc.identifier.otherDOI:10.1186/s13071-017-2125-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/31897
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherParasites and Vectorsen_US
dc.titleResponse to the Letter to the Editor by Eberhard et al.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Response to the Letter to the Editor byEberhard et al..pdf
Size:
269.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Department of Microbiology