Role of actor networks in primary health care implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

dc.contributor.authorGadeka, D.D.
dc.contributor.authorAkweongo, P.
dc.contributor.authorWhyle, E.
dc.contributor.authorAryeetey, G.C.
dc.contributor.authorAheto, J.M.
dc.contributor.authorGilson, L.
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T11:50:33Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T11:50:33Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Primary health care (PHC) improvement is often undermined by implementation gaps in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The influence that actor networks might have on the implementation has received little attention up to this point. Objective: This study sought to offer insights about actor networks and how they support PHC implementation in LMICs. Methods: We reviewed primary studies that utilised social network analysis (SNA) to determine actor networks and their influence on aspects of PHC in LMICs following the five-stage scoping review methodological framework by Arksey and O’Malley. Narrative synthesis was applied to describe the included studies and the results. Results: Thirteen primary studies were found eligible for this review. Ten network types were identified from the included papers across different contexts and actors: professional advice networks, peer networks, support/supervisory networks, friendship networks, referral networks, community health committee (CHC) networks, inter-sectoral collaboration networks, partnership networks, communications networks, and inter-organisational network. The networks were found to support PHC implementation at patient/household or community-level, health facility-level and multi-partner networks that work across levels. The study demonstrates that: (1) patient/household or community-level networks promote early health seeking, continuity of care and inclusiveness by enabling network members (actors) the support that ensures access to PHC services, (2) health facility-level networks enable collaboration among PHC staff and also ensure the building of social capital that enhances accountability and access to community health services, and (3) multi-partner networks that work across levels promote implementation by facilitating information and resource sharing, high professional trust and effective communication among actors. Conclusion: This body of literature reviewed suggests that, actor networks exist across different levels and that they make a difference in PHC implementation. Social Network Analysis may be a useful approach to health policy analysis (HPA) on implementation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTo cite this article: Dominic Dormenyo Gadeka, Patricia Akweongo, Eleanor Whyle, Genevieve Cecilia Aryeetey, Justice Moses Aheto & Lucy Gilson (2023) Role of actor networks in primary health care implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review, Global Health Action, 16:1, 2206684, DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2206684en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2206684
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh:8080/handle/123456789/39289
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGLOBAL HEALTH ACTIONen_US
dc.subjectPolicy implementationen_US
dc.subjectprimary health careen_US
dc.subject; health policy analysisen_US
dc.titleRole of actor networks in primary health care implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Role-of-actor-networks-in-primary-health-care-implementation-in-low-and-middleincome-countries-a-scoping-reviewGlobal-Health-Action.pdf
Size:
831.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: