Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries

dc.contributor.authorRandall, A.K.
dc.contributor.authorLeon, G.
dc.contributor.authorBasili, E.
dc.contributor.authorMartos, T.
dc.contributor.authorBoiger, M.
dc.contributor.authorBaldi, M.
dc.contributor.authorHocker, L.
dc.contributor.authorKline, K.
dc.contributor.authorMasturzi, A.
dc.contributor.authorAryeetey, R.
dc.contributor.authorBar-Kalifa, E.
dc.contributor.authorBoon, S.D.
dc.contributor.authorBotella, L.
dc.contributor.authorBurke, T.
dc.contributor.authorCarnelley, K.B.
dc.contributor.authorCarr, A.
dc.contributor.authorDash, A.
dc.contributor.authorFitriana, M.
dc.contributor.authorGaines Jr, S.O.
dc.contributor.authorGaldiolo, S.
dc.contributor.authorHart, C.M.
dc.contributor.authorJoo, S.
dc.contributor.authorKanth, B.
dc.contributor.authorKarademas, E.
dc.contributor.authorKarantzas, G.
dc.contributor.authorLandolt, S.A.
dc.contributor.authorMcHugh, L.
dc.contributor.authorMilek, A.
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, E.
dc.contributor.authorNatividade, J.C.
dc.contributor.authorPortugal, A.
dc.contributor.authorQuin˜ones, A.
dc.contributor.authorRelvas, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorRumondor, P.C.B.
dc.contributor.authorRusu, P.
dc.contributor.authorSallay, V.
dc.contributor.authorSaul, L.A.
dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, D.P.
dc.contributor.authorSels, L.
dc.contributor.authorShujja, S.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, L.K.
dc.contributor.authorOzguluk, S.B.
dc.contributor.authorVerhofstadt, L.
dc.contributor.authorYoo, G.
dc.contributor.authorZemp, M.
dc.contributor.authorDonato, S.
dc.contributor.authorTotenhagen, C.J.
dc.contributor.authorvan Eickels, R.L.
dc.contributor.authorAdil, A.
dc.contributor.authorAnaba, E.A.
dc.contributor.authorAsampong, E.
dc.contributor.authorBeauchemin-Roy, S.
dc.contributor.authorBerry, A.
dc.contributor.authorBrassard, A.
dc.contributor.authorChesterman, S.
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, L.
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, G.
dc.contributor.authorGaugue, J.
dc.contributor.authorGeonet, M.
dc.contributor.authorHermesch, N.
dc.contributor.authorKhan, R.K.A.W.
dc.contributor.authorKnox, L.
dc.contributor.authorLafontaine, M.
dc.contributor.authorLawless, N.
dc.contributor.authorLondero-Santos, A.
dc.contributor.authorMajor, S.
dc.contributor.authorMarot, T.A.
dc.contributor.authorMullins, E.
dc.contributor.authorOtermans, P.C.J.
dc.contributor.authorPagani, A.F.
dc.contributor.authorParise, M.
dc.contributor.authorParvin, R.
dc.contributor.authorDe, M.
dc.contributor.authorPeloquin, K.
dc.contributor.authorRebelo, B.
dc.contributor.authorRighetti, F.
dc.contributor.authorRomano, D.
dc.contributor.authorSalavati, S.
dc.contributor.authorSamrock, S.
dc.contributor.authorSerea, M.
dc.contributor.authorSeok, C.B.
dc.contributor.authorSotero, L.
dc.contributor.authorStafford, O.
dc.contributor.authorThomadakis, C.
dc.contributor.authorTopcu-Uzer, C.
dc.contributor.authorUgarte, C.
dc.contributor.authorLow, W.Y.
dc.contributor.authorSimon-Zambori, P.
dc.contributor.authorSiau, C.S.
dc.contributor.authorDuca, D.
dc.contributor.authorFilip, C.
dc.contributor.authorPark, H.
dc.contributor.authorWearen, S.
dc.contributor.authorBodenmann, G.
dc.contributor.authorChiarolanza, C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-21T17:05:16Z
dc.date.available2022-01-21T17:05:16Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractFollowing the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the “new normal”—social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented.en_US
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1177/02654075211034236
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/37763
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGEen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectdistressen_US
dc.subjectdyadic copingen_US
dc.subjectmultinationen_US
dc.subjectrelationship qualityen_US
dc.titleCoping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Coping-with-global-uncertainty-Perceptions-of-COVID19-psychological-distress-relationship-quality-and-dyadic-coping-for-romantic-partners-across-27-countriesJournal-of-Social-and-Personal-Relationships.pdf
Size:
2.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: