Evaluation of the City and Guilds Level 3 Adult 8umeracy Support Course at Merton College in the UK
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences
Abstract
This paper looks at the evaluation of the Level 3 Certificate in Adult Numeracy Support (City and
Guilds 9484) course at Merton College. The latter is a general further education (FE) college and
the main provider of post-16 education and training in the London Borough of Merton. The
College also runs a number of higher education (HE) courses. The course was introduced into the
School of Community Education following the college’s successful bid to run a Level 3 course in
numeracy in partnership with other colleges in the South London learning Partnership. The main
objective of the evaluation of the course at Merton College was to find out how the course
measured up to the standards specified by the DfES/FENTO Subject Specifications and echoed by
City and Guilds in the Course handbook (City and Guilds, 2005) as well as the procedures
specified in the Merton College College’s Quality Assurance system. It was clear that the team
was faced with challenges in understanding the level of the mathematics content required, and of
linking this with strategies, methods and skills to teach adult numeracy learners. One critical
observation the author made was the team’s inability to change the course structure and content to
suit the needs of the candidates. One other limitation of the course was the absence of information
and computer technology use. Candidates were not introduced to adequate use of information and
computer technology (ICT) as part of their learning. The author observes further that initial
teacher education is a complex combination of knowledge as it requires specialist knowledge but
at the same time much depends on experience and learning on the job. There is little doubt that the
lack of thorough and systematic support for trainees in the place of teaching is a profound
systemic weakness that impoverishes all teacher education programmes, not just those discussed
in this paper
Description
Research Article