Characteristics of latrine promotion participants and non-participants; inspection of latrines; and perceptions of household latrines in Northern Ghana

dc.contributor.authorRodgers, A.F.
dc.contributor.authorAjono, L.A.
dc.contributor.authorGyapong, J.O.
dc.contributor.authorHagan, M.
dc.contributor.authorEmerson, P.M.
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-13T13:17:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-16T12:21:22Z
dc.date.available2012-09-13T13:17:14Z
dc.date.available2017-10-16T12:21:22Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To examine characteristics of household heads in two districts of Northern Ghana who had or had not participated in latrine promotion programmes; to inspect latrines; and to explore perceptions of latrine ownership. Methods: One hundred and twenty latrine owners and 120 non-owners were randomly selected from all trachoma-endemic villages and interviewed. Structured questionnaires assessed demographics, household data, wealth indicators, and perceptions of latrine ownership. Latrines were inspected. Results: Latrine owners and non-owners were similar demographically, but owners were more likely to report any education or wealth indicators: any education OR ¼ 2.0, (95% CI 1.2–3.4); large family size OR ¼ 4.6 (2.6–8.2); children in school OR ¼ 3.8 (1.3–10.5); and metal roof OR ¼ 9.1 (2.0–40.0). All 120 latrine owners were participating in promotion programmes; no latrines had been self-built without programme support. Inspection showed 73/120 (60.1%) latrines were completed and used. Of the uncompleted latrines 41/47 (87.2%) were more than a year old. Programme participants (regardless of whether they had a completed latrine) had contributed cash (mean $16.74 S.D.18.09) and 117/120 had provided labour and/or construction materials. The most frequently reported advantages of latrine ownership were convenience, cleanliness and health benefits; reported disadvantages were the need for maintenance and cleaning and bad odour. Conclusions: Current latrine promotion programmes do not reach all households equally. Joining a latrine programme was expensive and did not guarantee latrine ownership; this may cause people to lose trust in such programmes. Latrines were perceived to be useful, suggesting unmet demand. Reliable and inclusive programmes that provide low cost latrines may receive community support.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTropical Medicine and International Health volume 12 no 6 pp 772–782 June 2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.255.68.203/handle/123456789/1845
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen_US
dc.subjectcommunity mobilizationen_US
dc.subjectGhanaen_US
dc.subjectlatrinesen_US
dc.subjectMusca sorbensen_US
dc.subjectsanitationen_US
dc.subjecttrachomaen_US
dc.titleCharacteristics of latrine promotion participants and non-participants; inspection of latrines; and perceptions of household latrines in Northern Ghanaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.82 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: