The Death Penalty: An African Perspective

dc.contributor.authorAgbanu, H.L.K.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-10T14:16:41Z
dc.date.available2019-12-10T14:16:41Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-04
dc.descriptionArticleen_US
dc.description.abstractGlobal debates about whether the death penalty should be abolished or not typically revolve around three main questions: (1) what are the legitimate purpose of punishment (the purposes argument), (2) whether any acts are so heinous that their perpetrators truly deserve to die (the desert argument), and (3) whether the fact that a community continues to use capital punishment is generally expressive of virtuous, or vicious, character traits among . its citizenry (the character argument). This article contends that because the different concerns of these three arguments are not always fully appreciated, abolitionists and retentionists often talk past one another. To illustrate this, we explore the implications of each type of argument in the context of indigenous African morality, showing how each argument takes on new meanings with different degrees of explanatory force. While we do not propose a specific resolution to the global death .penalty debate, we do reach conclusions about how participants in this global conversation ought to proceed.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/34097
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGhana Journal of Religion and Theology (GJRT)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNew Series;Vol 4
dc.subjectDeath Penaltyen_US
dc.subjectAfrican Perspectiveen_US
dc.titleThe Death Penalty: An African Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
8_Harry L.K Agbanu.pdf
Size:
9.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: