Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines

dc.contributor.authorPecenka, C.
dc.contributor.authorDebellut, F.
dc.contributor.authorBar-Zeev, N.
dc.contributor.authorAnwari, P.
dc.contributor.authorNonvignon, J.
dc.contributor.authorShamsuzzaman, M.
dc.contributor.authorClark, A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-17T12:13:53Z
dc.date.available2019-06-17T12:13:53Z
dc.date.issued2018-11
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Diarrhea is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and rotavirus accounts for many of these deaths. As of August 2018, 96 countries have introduced rotavirus vaccines into their immunization programs. Two rotavirus vaccines, Rotarix® and RotaTeq®, have been WHO-prequalified since 2009, with Rotarix® being the preferred product of most Gavi-supported countries. ROTAVAC® and ROTASIIL® have both been prequalified recently. Materials and methods We reevaluated the costs and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi and compared Rotarix®, ROTAVAC®, and ROTASIIL® in each country. For consistency with previously published analyses in these countries, we used the same Excel-based cohort model and much of the same data as the original analyses. We varied the expected price (with and without Gavi subsidy), wastage, and incremental health system costs associated with each vaccine. We assumed the same efficacy and waning assumptions following administration of two or three doses for the respective product. Results The discounted cost per DALY averted compared to no vaccination ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 times GNI per capita for each vaccine. With the Gavi subsidy, the average cost-effectiveness ratios were below 0.3 times GNI per capita in all three countries. Though critical empirical cost data are not yet available, Rotarix® is the least costly and most cost-effective product in the countries examined in this modelling study. However, small decreases in the incremental health system cost for other products could result in cost and cost-effectiveness outcomes that match or surpass those of Rotarix®. Conclusion Countries may wish to consider new rotavirus vaccines entering the market. Countries should carefully examine multiple product attributes including price and the incremental health system costs associated with each vaccine. These costs will vary by country and may be a defining factor in determining the least costly and most cost-effective product for the population.en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.068
dc.identifier.otherVolume 36, Issue 49, Pages 7472-7478
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/30832
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVaccineen_US
dc.subjectRotavirus vaccinesen_US
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectNew vaccine introductionen_US
dc.subjectGavi countriesen_US
dc.titleRe-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi: A comparison of three rotavirus vaccinesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Re-evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Bangladesh, Ghana, and Malawi A comparison of three rotavirus vaccines.pdf
Size:
342.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: