Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence from cross-sectional surveys on hidden caesarean sections among women with stillbirths in Ghana, 2007 and 2017
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background Caesarean section (CS) rates in women
experiencing stillbirth have not been studied with nationally
representative data. Two Ghana Maternal Health Surveys
(GMHS) have captured pregnancy and mode of birth data
for all women including those with stillbirths. We compared
CS rates between women with live births and stillbirths,
and identified socio-economic and pregnancy-related
factors associated with CS in stillbirths.
Methods A population-based cross-sectional study was
conducted in a pooled sample of 17 138women who had
given birth within 5 years preceding the 2007 and 2017
GMHS. CS rates were compared between women with
stillbirths and very early neonatal deaths (SBVENDs) and
women with live births who survived the first day. Bivariate
and multivariable logistic regressions explored variables
associated with CS. Effect modification of household’s
wealth and maternal educational level by birth outcome
was assessed using multivariable logistic regression with
interaction terms.
Results CS rate in women with SBVEND was 19.3%
compared with 9.6% in women with live births who
survived the first day (rate ratio 2.2; 95%CI 1.6 to 2.9). In
multivariable analysis, attaining middle school compared
with no formal education (adjusted OR, aOR 2.8; 95%CI
1.1 to 7.1), having had five or more births compared with
nulliparity (aOR 3.7; 95%CI 1.3 to 10.7) and reporting
prolonged or obstructed labour (aOR 3.3; 95%CI 1.3 to 8.3)
were associated with CS in women with SBVEND. Higher
household wealth and educational levels were associated
with an increased risk of CS in both study groups, with no
statistically significant difference in effect.
Conclusion Disaggregating CS rates by birth outcome
revealed a high rate among women with SBVEND, twice
the overall rate compared with live births. Exclusion of
these ‘hidden’ CSs from rate calculations may lead to
underestimation of (inter)national CS rates and potentially
conceals CS overuse or misuse
Description
Research Article
Keywords
Citation
: Zethof S, Christou A, Benova L, et al. Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence from cross-sectional surveys on hidden caesarean sections among women with stillbirths in Ghana, 2007 and 2017. BMJ Global Health 2023;8:e011591. doi:10.1136/ bmjgh-2022-011591