Considering escaping hell

dc.contributor.authorAni, E.I.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T11:39:25Z
dc.date.available2024-08-19T11:39:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractAdams argues that the traditional doctrine of eternal hellish experience stretches the Problem of Evil beyond any reasonable solution, as hell is stubbornly incompatible with God’s omnipotence, omniscience, and perfect goodness. Buckareff and Plug argue that people could leave hell. Matheson responds that if people could leave hell, people could leave heaven. But Matheson provides reasons to think that this is not possible. Luck attempts to refute Matheson’s argument. I show that Luck’s attempt contains analogies that lack features that crucially depict the asymmetrical relationship between heaven and hell. I suggest some other analogies that I think contain such features.en_US
dc.identifier.otherdoi:10.1017/S0034412521000548
dc.identifier.urihttps://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/42273
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherReligious Studiesen_US
dc.subjectAbrahamic Religionsen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Religionen_US
dc.subjectProblem of Hellen_US
dc.titleConsidering escaping hellen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Considering escaping hell.pdf
Size:
285.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: