Effects of grinding surgical tissue specimens and smear staining methods on Buruli ulcer microscopic diagnosis

dc.contributor.authorAffolabi, D.
dc.contributor.authorBankolé, H.
dc.contributor.authorAblordey, A.
dc.contributor.authorHounnouga, J.
dc.contributor.authorKoutchakpo, P.
dc.contributor.authorSopoh, G.
dc.contributor.authorAguiar, J.
dc.contributor.authorDossou, A.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, R.C.
dc.contributor.authorAnagonou, S.
dc.contributor.authorPortaels, F.
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-02T13:10:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-16T13:21:30Z
dc.date.available2012-05-02T13:10:54Z
dc.date.available2017-10-16T13:21:30Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractTo optimize Buruli ulcer (BU) microscopic diagnosis, we compared two smear preparation methods from tissue specimens: smears made with tissue suspension after grinding and smears made directly with unground tissue. We also compared two smear staining methods: auramine and Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN). IS 2404-PCR was used as reference method. One hundred and thirty-one surgical tissue specimens from patients suspected of having BU were analyzed. Both smear preparation methods and both staining methods were equivalent in any combination. Thus we recommend ZN stained smears of unground tissue for peripheral treatment centres.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.255.68.203/handle/123456789/913
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTropical Medicine and International Health 13(2):187-90en_US
dc.subjectBuruli ulceren_US
dc.subjectsmearen_US
dc.subjectstainingen_US
dc.subjecttissueen_US
dc.titleEffects of grinding surgical tissue specimens and smear staining methods on Buruli ulcer microscopic diagnosisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.82 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: