Detecting local risk factors for residual malaria in northern Ghana using Bayesian model averaging

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMillar, J.
dc.contributor.authorPsychas, P.
dc.contributor.authorAbuaku, B.
dc.contributor.authorAhorlu, C.
dc.contributor.authorAmratia, P.
dc.contributor.authorKoram, K.
dc.contributor.authorOppong, S.
dc.contributor.authorValle, D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-27T10:01:37Z
dc.date.available2019-06-27T10:01:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.description.abstractBackground There is a need for comprehensive evaluations of the underlying local factors that contribute to residual malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. However, it is difficult to compare the wide array of demographic, socio-economic, and environmental variables associated with malaria transmission using standard statistical approaches while accounting for seasonal differences and nonlinear relationships. This article uses a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) approach for identifying and comparing potential risk and protective factors associated with residual malaria. Results The relative influence of a comprehensive set of demographic, socio-economic, environmental, and malaria intervention variables on malaria prevalence were modelled using BMA for variable selection. Data were collected in Bunkpurugu-Yunyoo, a rural district in northeast Ghana that experiences holoendemic seasonal malaria transmission, over six biannual surveys from 2010 to 2013. A total of 10,022 children between the ages 6 to 59 months were used in the analysis. Multiple models were developed to identify important risk and protective factors, accounting for seasonal patterns and nonlinear relationships. These models revealed pronounced nonlinear associations between malaria risk and distance from the nearest urban centre and health facility. Furthermore, the association between malaria risk and age and some ethnic groups was significantly different in the rainy and dry seasons. BMA outperformed other commonly used regression approaches in out-of-sample predictive ability using a season-to-season validation approach. Conclusions This modelling framework offers an alternative approach to disease risk factor analysis that generates interpretable models, can reveal complex, nonlinear relationships, incorporates uncertainty in model selection, and produces accurate predictions. Certain modelling applications, such as designing targeted local interventions, require more sophisticated statistical methods which are capable of handling a wide range of relevant data while maintaining interpretability and predictive performance, and directly characterize uncertainty. To this end, BMA represents a valuable tool for constructing more informative models for understanding risk factors for malaria, as well as other vector-borne and environmentally mediated diseases.en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2491-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/31065
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMalaria Journalen_US
dc.subjectRisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectBayesian model averagingen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear patternsen_US
dc.subjectStatistical methodsen_US
dc.titleDetecting local risk factors for residual malaria in northern Ghana using Bayesian model averagingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Detecting local risk factors for residual malaria in northern Ghana using Bayesian model averaging.pdf
Size:
2.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Epidemiology Department