Amoebae as Potential Environmental Hosts for Mycobacterium ulcerans and Other Mycobacteria, but Doubtful Actors in Buruli Ulcer Epidemiology

dc.contributor.authorGryseels, S.
dc.contributor.authorAmissah, D.
dc.contributor.authorDurnez, L.
dc.contributor.authorVandelannoote, K.
dc.contributor.authorLeirs, H.
dc.contributor.authorDe Jonckheere, J.
dc.contributor.authorSilva, M.T.
dc.contributor.authorPortaels, F.
dc.contributor.authorAblordey, A.
dc.contributor.authorEddyani, M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-28T11:01:59Z
dc.date.available2018-08-28T11:01:59Z
dc.date.issued2012-08
dc.description.abstractBackground: The reservoir and mode of transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, remain unknown. Ecological, genetic and epidemiological information nonetheless suggests that M. ulcerans may reside in aquatic protozoa. Methodology/Principal Findings: We experimentally infected Acanthamoeba polyphaga with M. ulcerans and found that the bacilli were phagocytised, not digested and remained viable for the duration of the experiment. Furthermore, we collected 13 water, 90 biofilm and 45 detritus samples in both Buruli ulcer endemic and non-endemic communities in Ghana, from which we cultivated amoeboid protozoa and mycobacteria. M. ulcerans was not isolated, but other mycobacteria were as frequently isolated from intracellular as from extracellular sources, suggesting that they commonly infect amoebae in nature. We screened the samples as well as the amoeba cultures for the M. ulcerans markers IS2404, IS2606 and KR-B. IS2404 was detected in 2% of the environmental samples and in 4% of the amoeba cultures. The IS2404 positive amoeba cultures included up to 5 different protozoan species, and originated both from Buruli ulcer endemic and non-endemic communities. Conclusions/Significance: This is the first report of experimental infection of amoebae with M. ulcerans and of the detection of the marker IS2404 in amoeba cultures isolated from the environment. We conclude that amoeba are potential natural hosts for M. ulcerans, yet remain sceptical about their implication in the transmission of M. ulcerans to humans and their importance in the epidemiology of Buruli ulcer.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCitation: Gryseels S, Amissah D, Durnez L, Vandelannoote K, Leirs H, et al. (2012) Amoebae as Potential Environmental Hosts for Mycobacterium ulcerans and Other Mycobacteria, but Doubtful Actors in Buruli Ulcer Epidemiology. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6(8): e1764. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001764en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/23889
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLOS Neglected Tropical Diseasesen_US
dc.subjectAmoebaeen_US
dc.subjectPotentialen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmentalen_US
dc.subjectMycobacteriumen_US
dc.subjectulceransen_US
dc.subjectMycobacteriaen_US
dc.subjectDoubtfulen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.titleAmoebae as Potential Environmental Hosts for Mycobacterium ulcerans and Other Mycobacteria, but Doubtful Actors in Buruli Ulcer Epidemiologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gryseels-S_Amoebae-as-Potential-Environmental-Hosts-for-Mycobacterium-ulcerans-and-Other-Mycobacteria-but-Doubtful-Actors-in-Buruli-Ulcer-EpidemiologyOpen-Access_2012.pdf
Size:
841.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: