The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and within Nations: A 35-Nation Study
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2016
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Frontiers in Psychology
Abstract
Objective: Theories about how couples help each other to cope with stress, such as the
systemic transactional model of dyadic coping, suggests that the cultural context in which
couples' lives influence how their coping behavior affects their relationship satisfaction.
In contrast to the theoretical assumptions, a recent meta-analysis provides evidence
that neither culture nor gender influences the association between dyadic coping and
relationship satisfaction, at least based on their samples of couples living in North America
and West Europe. Thus, it is an open question whether the theoretical assumptions of
cultural influences are false or whether cultural influences on couple behavior just occur
in cultures outside of the Western world.
Method: To examine the cultural influence, using a sample of married individuals
(N = 7973) from 35 nations, we used multilevel modeling to test whether the positive
association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction varies across nations
and whether gender might moderate the association.
Results: Results reveal that the association between dyadic coping and relationship
satisfaction varies between nations. In addition, results show that in some
nations the association is higher for men and in other nations, it is higher for
women.
Conclusions: Cultural and gender differences across the globe influence how couples’
coping behavior affects relationship outcomes. This crucial finding indicates that a couple
relationship education programs and interventions need to be culturally adapted, as skill
trainings such as dyadic coping lead to differential effects on relationship satisfaction
based on the culture in which couples live.
Description
Research Article
Keywords
dyadic coping, relationship satisfaction, culture, gender differences
Citation
Hilpert P, Randall AK, Sorokowski P, Atkins DC, Sorokowska A, Ahmadi K, Alghraibeh AM, Aryeetey R, Bertoni A, Bettache K, Błazejewska M, ˙ Bodenmann G, Borders J, Bortolini TS, Butovskaya M, Castro FN, Cetinkaya H, Cunha D, David OA, DeLongis A, Dileym FA, Domínguez Espinosa ADC, Donato S, Dronova D, Dural S, Fisher M, Frackowiak T, Gulbetekin E, Hamamcıoglu Akkaya A, Hansen K, ˘ Hattori WT, Hromatko I, Iafrate R, James BO, Jiang F, Kimamo CO, King DB, Koç F, Laar A, Lopes FDA, Martinez R, Mesko N, Molodovskaya N, Moradi K, Motahari Z, Natividade JC, Ntayi J, Ojedokun O, Omar-Fauzee MSB, Onyishi IE, Özener B, Paluszak A, Portugal A, Relvas AP, Rizwan M, Salkicevi ˇ c S, Sarmány-Schuller I, ´ Stamkou E, Stoyanova S, Šukolová D, Sutresna N, Tadinac M, Teras A, Tinoco Ponciano EL, Tripathi R, Tripathi N, Tripathi M, Vilchinsky N, Xu F, Yamamoto ME and Yoo G (2016) The Associations of Dyadic Coping and Relationship Satisfaction Vary between and within Nations: A 35-Nation Study. Front. Psychol. 7:1106. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106