Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/ or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method
Date
2019-12-05
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Malaria Journal
Abstract
Background: The influx of substandard and falsified medicines is a global public health challenge and its rapid
detection is a key solution to the menace. This study used three screening methods and one confirmatory method for
the quality assessment of 25 batches of artemether/lumefantrine dosage forms from the Ghanaian market to test that
combined screening methods only can rapidly detect substandard and/or falsified medicines in areas where confirmatory
methods may not be available.
Methods: The quality of artemether/lumefantrine tablet products obtained from pharmacies and licensed chemical
seller shops within the Accra metropolis in Ghana were analysed using three screening methods (GPHF Minilab, Colorimetry
and Counterfeit Drug Indicator) and one confirmatory method (high-performance liquid chromatography).
Results: The results showed that 18/25 batches of the artemether/lumefantrine samples passed using the combined
screening and confirmatory methods and 5/25 batches of the artemether/lumefantrine samples failed using
the combined screening and confirmatory methods. However, 1/25 batch of the artemether/lumefantrine samples
failed using the combined screening methods but passed using the confirmatory method. Also, 1/25 batch of the
artemether/lumefantrine samples passed using the combined screening methods but failed using the confirmatory
method. This notwithstanding, the combined screening methods and the confirmatory method provided equivalent
quality assessment profiles for 23/25 (92%) batches of the artemether/lumefantrine tablet products. Out of the
6 samples that failed the confirmatory test, 1/6, 2/6, and 3/6 failed on the high (> 110%), low (< 90%), and no active
ingredient (0%), respectively. The sensitivity of Minilab, colorimetric, CoDI, and the combined screening methods at
95% confidence level were 0.5 ± 0.57, 0.83 ± 0.33, 0.75 ± 0.49, and 0.83 ± 0.33, respectively. Also, the specificity of
Minilab, colorimetric, CoDI, and the combined screening methods at 95% confidence level were 1.00, 0.95 ± 0.10, 1.00,
and 0.95 ± 0.10, respectively.
Conclusion: The combined screening methods may be used for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard
medicines without using a confirmatory method. However, additional research on the best combinations of screening
devices/methods to rapidly detect the quality of medicines is recommended.
Description
Research Article
Keywords
Anti-malarial, Falsified medicines, Substandard medicines, Screening and confirmatory methods