Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria
dc.contributor.author | Mitchell, K.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Le´pine, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Torpey, K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-15T19:12:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-15T19:12:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description | Research Article | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To estimate the impact and cost-effectiveness of treatment as prevention (TasP), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom promotion for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria. Design: Mathematical and cost modelling. Methods: A deterministic model of HIV-1 transmission within a cohort of serodiscor dant couples and to/from external partners was parameterized using data from Nigeria and other African settings. The impact and cost-effectiveness were estimated for condom promotion, PrEP and/or TasP, compared with a baseline where antiretroviral therapy (ART) was offered according to 2010 national guidelines (CD4þ <350 cells/ml) to all HIV-positive partners. The impact was additionally compared with a baseline of current ART coverage (35% of those with CD4þ <350 cells/ml). Full costs (in US $2012) of programme introduction and implementation were estimated from a provider perspective. Results: Substantial benefits came from scaling up ART to all HIV-positive partners according to 2010 national guidelines, with additional smaller benefits of providing TasP, PrEP or condom promotion. Compared with a baseline of offering ART to all HIV positive partners at the 2010 national guidelines, condom promotion was the most cost effective strategy [US $1206/disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY)], the next most cost effective intervention was to additionally give TasP to HIV-positive partners (incre mental cost-effectiveness ratio US $1607/DALY), followed by additionally giving PrEP to HIV-negative partners until their HIV-positive partners initiate ART (US $7870/ DALY). When impact was measured in terms of infections averted, PrEP with condom promotion prevented double the number of infections as condom promotion alone. Conclusions: The first priority intervention for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria should be scaled up ART access for HIV-positive partners. Subsequent incremental benefits are greatest with condom promotion and TasP, followed by PrEP. | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000798 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh:8080/handle/123456789/40044 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | AIDS | en_US |
dc.subject | antiretroviral therapy | en_US |
dc.subject | condom | en_US |
dc.subject | disability-adjusted life years | en_US |
dc.title | Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of.pdf
- Size:
- 522.77 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: