Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeria

dc.contributor.authorMitchell, K.M.
dc.contributor.authorLe´pine, A.
dc.contributor.authorTorpey, K.
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-15T19:12:44Z
dc.date.available2023-09-15T19:12:44Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To estimate the impact and cost-effectiveness of treatment as prevention (TasP), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and condom promotion for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria. Design: Mathematical and cost modelling. Methods: A deterministic model of HIV-1 transmission within a cohort of serodiscor dant couples and to/from external partners was parameterized using data from Nigeria and other African settings. The impact and cost-effectiveness were estimated for condom promotion, PrEP and/or TasP, compared with a baseline where antiretroviral therapy (ART) was offered according to 2010 national guidelines (CD4þ <350 cells/ml) to all HIV-positive partners. The impact was additionally compared with a baseline of current ART coverage (35% of those with CD4þ <350 cells/ml). Full costs (in US $2012) of programme introduction and implementation were estimated from a provider perspective. Results: Substantial benefits came from scaling up ART to all HIV-positive partners according to 2010 national guidelines, with additional smaller benefits of providing TasP, PrEP or condom promotion. Compared with a baseline of offering ART to all HIV positive partners at the 2010 national guidelines, condom promotion was the most cost effective strategy [US $1206/disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY)], the next most cost effective intervention was to additionally give TasP to HIV-positive partners (incre mental cost-effectiveness ratio US $1607/DALY), followed by additionally giving PrEP to HIV-negative partners until their HIV-positive partners initiate ART (US $7870/ DALY). When impact was measured in terms of infections averted, PrEP with condom promotion prevented double the number of infections as condom promotion alone. Conclusions: The first priority intervention for serodiscordant couples in Nigeria should be scaled up ART access for HIV-positive partners. Subsequent incremental benefits are greatest with condom promotion and TasP, followed by PrEP.en_US
dc.identifier.otherDOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000798
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh:8080/handle/123456789/40044
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAIDSen_US
dc.subjectantiretroviral therapyen_US
dc.subjectcondomen_US
dc.subjectdisability-adjusted life yearsen_US
dc.titleModelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of combination prevention amongst HIV serodiscordant couples in Nigeriaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Modelling the impact and cost-effectiveness of.pdf
Size:
522.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: