Delphi Survey To Explore Core Curriculum For Training The Next Generation Of Hepatologists
| dc.contributor.author | Xu, X. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shi, Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tacke, F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | George, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | et al. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-21T14:00:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-09 | |
| dc.description | Research Article | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background & Aims: Hepatology is experiencing major shifts in disease etiologies and is raising demand for multidisciplinary care. However, a globally harmonized framework defining core training content remains lacking. We aimed to develop a globally informed expert consensus framework for the content of core hepatology training, to provide a structured foundation for cur riculum development. Methods: A two-round modified Delphi using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was conducted. A comprehensive list of curriculum items was developed from international training standards, refined by a steering committee, and rated by a stratified international panel. Consensus was determined using medians and a disagreement index (DI), which classified curriculum items as essential, desirable, or optional. Results: A total of 456 experts completed Round 1, of whom 78.7% also completed Round 2. Consensus was strongest for foundational knowledge and core diagnostic skills, including interpretation of abnormal liver function and liver screening test results, and non-invasive fibrosis assessment (both DI = 0). Management of major liver diseases was consistently prioritized as essential. Procedures with the highest endorsement for independent performance were paracentesis, transient elastography, variceal screening, and endoscopic variceal therapy. Consensus was limited for conventional ultrasonography and advanced interventions, reflecting regional variability in resources and scope of practice. Most experts (79.1%) supported formal training in research methodology, and the median recommended fellowship length was 24 months. Subgroup differences were mainly observed in selected resource-dependent or highly specialized items. Conclusions: This global consensus offers a priority-stratified outline of core hepatology training content providing a practical foundation for curriculum development and staged implementation across diverse health systems. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The study was funded by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2025ZD01906200), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82570717), and Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang University (XY2025073). | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Xu, X., Shi, Y., Tacke, F., Wong, V. W. S., Li, W., Sebastiani, G., ... & Global Hepatology Training Consortium. (2026). Delphi survey to explore core curriculum for training the next-generation of hepatologists☆. JHEP Reports, 101942. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101942 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/45826 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | JHEP Reports | |
| dc.subject | Delphi | |
| dc.subject | hepatologists | |
| dc.subject | next generation | |
| dc.title | Delphi Survey To Explore Core Curriculum For Training The Next Generation Of Hepatologists | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Delphi survey to explore core curriculum for training the next .pdf
- Size:
- 1.69 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
