A global assessment of policy tools to support climate adaptation

dc.contributor.authorUlibarri, N.
dc.contributor.authorAjibade, I.
dc.contributor.authorGalappaththi, E.K.
dc.contributor.authorJoe, E.T.
dc.contributor.authorLesnikowski, A.
dc.contributor.authorMach, K.J.
dc.contributor.authorMusah-Surugu, J.I.
dc.contributor.authorAlverio, G.N.
dc.contributor.authorSegnon, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorSiders, A.R.
dc.contributor.authorSotnik, G.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, D.
dc.contributor.authorChalastani, V.I.
dc.contributor.authorJagannathan, K.
dc.contributor.authorKhavhagali, V.
dc.contributor.authorReckien, D.
dc.contributor.authorShang, Y.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, C.
dc.contributor.authorZommers, Z.
dc.contributor.authoret., al.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-04T10:58:03Z
dc.date.available2022-01-04T10:58:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionResearch Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractGovernments, businesses, and civil society organizations have diverse policy tools to incentivize adaptation. Policy tools can shape the type and extent of adaptation, and therefore, function either as barriers or enablers for reducing risk and vulnerability. Using data from a systematic review of academic literature on global adaptation responses to climate change (n = 1549 peer-reviewed articles), we categorize the types of policy tools used to shape climate adaptation. We apply qualitative and quantitative analyses to assess the contexts where particular tools are used, along with equity implications for groups targeted by the tools, and the tools’ relationships with transformational adaptation indicators such as the depth, scope, and speed of adaptation. We find diverse types of tools documented across sectors and geographic regions. We also identify a mismatch between the tools that consider equity and those that yield more transformational adaptations. Direct regulations, plans, and capacity building are associated with higher depth and scope of adaptation (thus transformational adaptation), while economic instruments, information provisioning, and networks are not; the latter tools, however, are more likely to target marginalized groups in their design and implementation. We identify multiple research gaps, including a need to assess instrument mixes rather than single tools and to assess adaptations that result from policy implementation.en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.2002251
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/37415
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Groupen_US
dc.subjectClimate change adaptationen_US
dc.subjectpolicy instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectAdaptation Mapping Initiative (GAMI)en_US
dc.subjecttransformational adaptationen_US
dc.subjectequityen_US
dc.titleA global assessment of policy tools to support climate adaptationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A-global-assessment-of-policy-tools-to-support-climate-adaptationClimate-Policy.pdf
Size:
4.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: