Mental health policy process: a comparative study of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia

dc.contributor.authorOmar, Maye A
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Andrew T
dc.contributor.authorBird, Philippa K
dc.contributor.authorMirzoev, Tolib
dc.contributor.authorFlisher, Alan J
dc.contributor.authorKigozi, Fred
dc.contributor.authorLund, Crick
dc.contributor.authorMwanza, Jason
dc.contributor.authorOfori-Atta, Angela L
dc.contributor.authorMental Health and Poverty Research Programme Consortium (MHaPP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-14T13:17:01Z
dc.date.available2014-08-14T13:17:01Z
dc.date.issued2010-08-02
dc.date.updated2014-08-14T13:17:12Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Mental illnesses are increasingly recognised as a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet many countries lack a mental health policy or have an outdated, inappropriate policy. This paper explores the development of appropriate mental health policies and their effective implementation. It reports comparative findings on the processes for developing and implementing mental health policies in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia as part of the Mental Health and Poverty Project. Methods The study countries and respondents were purposively selected to represent different levels of mental health policy and system development to allow comparative analysis of the factors underlying the different forms of mental health policy development and implementation. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Data analysis was guided by conceptual framework that was developed for this purpose. A framework approach to analysis was used, incorporating themes that emerged from the data and from the conceptual framework. Results Mental health policies in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia are weak, in draft form or non-existent. Mental health remained low on the policy agenda due to stigma and a lack of information, as well as low prioritisation by donors, low political priority and grassroots demand. Progress with mental health policy development varied and respondents noted a lack of consultation and insufficient evidence to inform policy development. Furthermore, policies were poorly implemented, due to factors including insufficient dissemination and operationalisation of policies and a lack of resources. Conclusions Mental health policy processes in all four countries were inadequate, leading to either weak or non-existent policies, with an impact on mental health services. Recommendations are provided to strengthen mental health policy processes in these and other African countries.
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.255.68.203/handle/123456789/5618
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderMaye A Omar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.titleMental health policy process: a comparative study of Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1752-4458-4-24.pdf
Size:
680.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1752-4458-4-24.xml
Size:
59.15 KB
Format:
Extensible Markup Language

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.82 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: