The Consensus Project and Three Levels of Deliberation

dc.contributor.authorAni, I.E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-09T10:17:34Z
dc.date.available2019-07-09T10:17:34Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.description.abstractThe basic argument is that the consensus debate has not been very meaningful until now because consensus has not been closely studied as a concept, and deliberation has not been studied precisely in terms of the propensity to reach common agreement. In particular, deliberation—as well as issues for deliberation—has not been categorized into different levels with a view to exposing the varying challenges of reaching common agreement and the kinds of deliberative approaches entailed in each category. In this research, I attempt to provide this categorization in order to clarify the debate. Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2018en_US
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1017/S0012217318000082
dc.identifier.urihttp://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/31336
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDialogue-Canadian Philosophical Reviewen_US
dc.subjectConsensusen_US
dc.subjectDeliberationen_US
dc.subjectFactsen_US
dc.subjectInterestsen_US
dc.subjectReasonsen_US
dc.subjectValuesen_US
dc.titleThe Consensus Project and Three Levels of Deliberationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: