Browsing by Author "Kobina, A.C."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Five Years After; the Impact of a Participatory Technology Development Programme as Perceived by Smallholder Farmers in Benin and Ghana(Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2013-08) Sterk, B.; Kobina, A.C.; Gogan, A.C.; Sakyi-Dawson, O.; Kossou, D.Purpose: The article reports effects on livelihoods of a participatory technology development effort in Benin and Ghana (2001-2006), five years after it ended.Design: The study uses data from all smallholders who participated in seven experimental groups, each facilitated by a PhD researcher. Baseline data and controls were not available. In their dissertations the researchers had each made claims about the impact of their work on the livelihoods of those involved. These claims guided the study in each group, and referred to both impacts based on the superiority of the technology developed, and increased knowledge or capacity that participants claimed to have gained. Two local social scientists interviewed 187 farmers.Findings: The study found considerable evidence of continued beneficial use of technologies developed with farmers. The most important reason for no longer using a technology or institutional innovation was that smallholders had not been able to sustain the conditions for use. Lasting non-technological effects included more mutual understanding among community members, emancipation vis-à-vis researchers and colleagues, and an experimental attitude and research skills. Such effects were recorded for nearly all groups.Practical implications: Smallholders face small windows of opportunity. Technologies and institutional changes that depend on artificially created conditions are likely to be discontinued once those conditions are withdrawn (for example, access to Neem seeds or agreements about land use between landlords and tenants). The findings draw attention to the conditions that enable smallholders to innovate.Originality/value: The study represents a rare attempt to study impact five years later and compares seven independent cases. © 2013 Wageningen University.Item Household Vulnerability and Adaptation Options in Resource-Poor Communities in Accra, Ghana(University of Ghana, 2016-10) Kobina, A.C.The current impact of climate variability highlights the need for an increased understanding of the relationship between climate-sensitive disasters such as floods, vulnerability, and adaptation/coping strategies of households. With few exceptions, given the variations in sociodemographic and economic characteristics, floods tend to have a disproportionate impact on resource-poor urban communities, particularly in developing countries. This study aimed to; (1) identify indicators of household vulnerability to floods and compute a household vulnerability index, (2) compare household’s perceived vulnerability to flood to the computed vulnerability, and finally (3) examine the relationship between the various components of households’ vulnerability and selected household coping/adaptation options. The source of data was a cross-sectional community survey from two resource-poor urban communities: Agbogbloshie and James Town in Accra, Ghana. Results showed that households in Agbogbloshie were more vulnerable to floods compared to their counterparts in James Town. More than half of the households underestimated their vulnerability to floods when compared to their computed vulnerability index. Among female household heads, those married and those who were unemployed were more likely to underestimate their vulnerability compared to those who were unmarried and employed. Among male household heads, a quadratic relationship was found between their age in years and underestimation of vulnerability. The relationship indicates that the likelihood to underestimate vulnerability to floods decreases as the age of the male household head increases up to a turning point (45 years), beyond which they become more likely to underestimate vulnerability. Components of household’s Adaptive capacity- sociodemographic profile, social capital- and Sensitivity- food insecurity- were significant predictors of households relocating as a coping strategy to floods. The study buttresses the need to acknowledge the impact of social capital and food security alongside conventional structural measures in addressing relocation because of floods. There is also a need to explore gendered perspectives of vulnerability to understand specific modulators of perception in resource-poor urban communities. These will in turn guide community interventions more efficiently.