Browsing by Author "Amponsa-Achiano, K."
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Barriers to healthcare workers reporting adverse events following immunization in four regions of Ghana(Vaccine, 2019-11-29) Bosomprah, S.; Gidudu, J.F.; Shaum, A.; Dodoo, A.; Bonsu, G.; Amponsa-Achiano, K.; Darko, D.M.; Sabblah, G.; Opare, J.; Nyaku, M.; Owusu-Boakye, B.; Oduro, A.; Aborigo, R.; Conklin, L.; Welaga, P.; Ampadu, H.H.Despite didactic training on adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in Ghana, the reporting ratio of AEFI was 1.56 per 100,000 surviving infants in 2015, below the minimum reporting ratio of 10. We aimed to estimate the proportion of health care workers (HCWs) reporting AEFI and to identify barriers to reporting. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of HCWs in four regions in Ghana. A simple random sample of 176 health facilities was selected and up to two HCWs were randomly selected per facility. We used the Rao-Scott Chi-squared test to compare factors associated with reporting of AEFI in the last year. We used an open-ended question to identify reasons for low reporting. One supervisor from each facility, responsible for overall reporting and management of AEFI, was also interviewed. A total of 306 HCWs from 169 facilities were interviewed. Of these, 176 (57.5%) reported they had ever encountered an AEFI. Of the 120 who had encountered an AEFI in the last year, 66 (55.0%) indicated they had reported the AEFI, and 38 (31.7%) completed a reporting form. HCWs (n = 120) reported multiple barriers to reporting of AEFI; the most common barriers were fear of personal consequences (44.1%), lack of knowledge or training (25.2%), and not believing an AEFI was serious enough to report (22.2%). Discussion of AEFI during the last supervisory visit was significantly associated with reporting in the past year (OR 7.39; p < .001). Of 172 supervisors interviewed, 65 (37.8%) mentioned their facilties had ever encountered an AEFI; over 90% of facilities had reporting forms. We identified low reporting of AEFI and multiple barriers to reporting among HCWs in the four selected regions of Ghana. Discussing AEFI during supervisory visits with HCWs might improve reporting. Additionally, strategies to address fear of personal consequences as a barrier to reporting of AEFI are needed.Item Community-based mass treatment with azithromycin for the elimination of yaws in GhanaÐResults of a pilot study(PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2018-03-22) Abdulai, A.A.; Agana-Nsiire, P.; Biney, F.; Kwakye-Maclean, C.; Kyei-Faried, S.; Amponsa-Achiano, K.; Simpson, S.V.; Bonsu, G.; Ohene, S.; Ampofo, W.K.; Adu-Sarkodie, Y.; Addo, K.K.; Chi, K.; Danavall, D.; Chen, C.Y.; Pillay, A.; Sanz, S.; Tun, Y.; Mitjà, O.; Asiedu, K.B.; Ballard, R.C.Introduction The WHO yaws eradication strategy consists of one round of total community treatment (TCT) of single-dose azithromycin with coverage of > 90%.The efficacy of the strategy to reduce the levels on infection has been demonstrated previously in isolated island communities in the Pacific region. We aimed to determine the efficacy of a single round of TCT with azithromycin to achieve a decrease in yaws prevalence in communities that are endemic for yaws and surrounded by other yaws-endemic areas. Methods Surveys for yaws seroprevalence and prevalence of skin lesions were conducted among schoolchildren aged 5±15 years before and one year after the TCT intervention in the Abamkrom sub-district of Ghana. We used a cluster design with the schools as the primary sampling unit. Among 20 eligible primary schools in the sub district, 10 were assigned to the baseline survey and 10 to the post-TCT survey. The field teams conducted a physical examination for skin lesions and a dual point-of-care immunoassay for non-treponemal and treponemal antibodies of all children present at the time of the visit. We also undertook surveys with non-probabilistic sampling to collect lesion swabs for etiology and macrolide resistance assessment. Results At baseline 14,548 (89%) of 16,287 population in the sub-district received treatment during TCT. Following one round of TCT, the prevalence of dual seropositivity among all children decreased from 10.9% (103/943) pre-TCT to 2.2% (27/1211) post-TCT (OR 0.19; 95%CI 0.09±0.37). The prevalence of serologically confirmed skin lesions consistent with active yaws was reduced from 5.7% (54/943) pre-TCT to 0.6% (7/1211) post-TCT (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.25±0.35). No evidence of resistance to macrolides against Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue was seen. Discussion A single round of high coverage TCT with azithromycin in a yaws affected sub-district adjoining other endemic areas is effective in reducing the prevalence of seropositive children and the prevalence of early skin lesions consistent with yaws one year following the intervention. These results suggest that national yaws eradication programmes may plan the gradual expansion of mass treatment interventions without high short-term risk of reintroduction of infection from contiguous untreated endemic areas.Item Evaluation of the adverse events following immunization surveillance system, Ghana, 2019(PLOS ONE, 2022) Larye, E.B.; Frimpong, J.A.; Noora, C.L.; Tengey, J.; Bandoh, D.; Sabblah, G.; Ameme, D.; Kenu, E.; Amponsa-Achiano, K.Background With over 80% of children worldwide vaccinated, concerns about vaccine safety continues to be a public health issue. Ghana’s Adverse Events Following Immunization surveillance started in 1978 with the objective to promptly detect and manage AEFI cases either real or perceived. Periodic evaluation of the surveillance system is critical for optimal performance; hence we evaluated the system to assess its attributes, usefulness and system’s performance in meeting its objectives. Methods A case of AEFI was defined as any untoward medical event occurring within 28 days after vaccination and may not necessarily have causal relationship with the vaccine use. We reviewed surveillance data and procedures for the period 2014 to 2018 and interviewed key stakeholders. Adapting the CDC’s Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems, we assessed the system’s attributes and usefulness. We performed summary descriptive statistics on quantitative data and directed content analysis on information gathered from interviews. Results In all, 2,282 AEFI cases including 476 (21%) serious cases (life threatening events) were reported for the period. The highest case detection rates of 61.45 AEFIs per 100,000 surviving infants was recorded in 2018. Reporting forms were modified to accommodate new indicators without any disruption in the function of the system. At the national level, completeness of 100 randomly sampled reporting forms (100%) and was higher than the region (27%) but timeliness (50%) was lower than the region (83%). All (16/16) Community Health Nurses interviewed indicated “fear of being victimized” as the reason for underreporting, nonetheless, the system was useful as it made them cautious when vaccinating children to prevent reactions. Data on AEFI surveillance was also useful in guiding training needs and provision of vaccination logistics. Conclusion The AEFI surveillance system is useful at all levels but partially meeting its objective due to underreporting. We recommend training and supportive supervision to improve timeliness of reporting, data completeness and acceptability.Item Post introduction evaluation of the malaria vaccine implementation programme in Ghana, 2021(BMC Public Health, 2023) Adjei, M.R.; Amponsa-Achiano, K.; Kaburi, B.B.; et al.Background Malaria remains a public health challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa with the region contributing to more than 90% of global cases in 2020. In Ghana, the malaria vaccine was piloted to assess the feasibility, safety, and its impact in the context of routine use alongside the existing recommended malaria control measures. To obtain context-specific evidence that could inform future strategies of introducing new vaccines, a standardized post-introduction evaluation (PIE) of the successes and challenges of the malaria vaccine implementation programme (MVIP) was conducted. Methods From September to December 2021, the WHO Post-Introduction Evaluation (PIE) tool was used to conduct a mixed methods evaluation of the MVIP in Ghana. To ensure representativeness, study sites and participants from the national level, 18 vaccinating districts, and 54 facilities from six of the seven pilot regions were purposively selected. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using data collection tools that were adapted based on the WHO PIE protocol. We performed summary descriptive statistics on quantitative data, thematic analysis on qualitative data, and triangulation of the results from both sets of analyses. Results About 90.7% (49/54) of health workers stated that the vaccine introduction process was smooth and contributed to an overall improvement of routine immunisation services. About 87.5% (47/54) of healthcare workers, and 95.8% (90/94) of caregivers accepted RTS,S malaria vaccine. Less than half [46.3%; (25/54)] of the healthcare workers participated in the pre-vaccine introduction training but almost all [94.4%; (51/54)] were able to constitute and administer the vaccine appropriately. About 92.5% (87/94) of caregivers were aware of the RTS,S introduction but only 44.0% (44/94) knew the number of doses needed for maximum protection. Health workers believed that the MVIP has had a positive impact on under five malaria morbidity. Conclusions The malaria vaccine has been piloted successfully in Ghana. Intensive advocacy; community engagement, and social mobilization; and regular onsite supportive supervision are critical enablers for successful introduction of new vaccines. Stakeholders are convinced of the feasibility of a nationwide scale up using a phased subnational approach taking into consideration malaria epidemiology and global availability of vaccines.