<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>1475-2875-11-388</ui>
	<ji>1475-2875</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine combination in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria among children under five years of age in three ecological zones in Ghana</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1" ca="yes"><snm>Abuaku</snm><fnm>Benjamin</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>babuaku@noguchi.mimcom.org</email></au>
				<au id="A2"><snm>Duah</snm><fnm>Nancy</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>nduah@noguchi.mimcom.org</email></au>
				<au id="A3"><snm>Quaye</snm><fnm>Lydia</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>lquaye@noguchi.mimcom.org</email></au>
				<au id="A4"><snm>Quashie</snm><fnm>Neils</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><insr iid="I2"/><email>nquashie@noguchi.mimcom.org</email></au>
				<au id="A5"><snm>Koram</snm><fnm>Kwadwo</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>kkoram@noguchi.mimcom.org</email></au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1"><p>Epidemiology Department, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, P. O. Box LG581, Legon, Ghana</p></ins>
				<ins id="I2"><p>Centre for Tropical Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Ghana Medical School, P. O. Box GP4236, Accra, Ghana</p></ins>
			</insg>
			<source>Malaria Journal</source>
			<issn>1475-2875</issn>
			<pubdate>2012</pubdate>
			<volume>11</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>388</fpage>
			<url>http://www.malariajournal.com/content/11/1/388</url>
			<xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-11-388</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">23173737</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history><rec><date><day>25</day><month>9</month><year>2012</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>21</day><month>11</month><year>2012</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>22</day><month>11</month><year>2012</year></date></pub></history>
		<cpyrt><year>2012</year><collab>Abuaku et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab><note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
		<kwdg>
			<kwd>Therapeutic efficacy</kwd>
			<kwd>Artemether-lumefantrine</kwd>
			<kwd>Uncomplicated malaria</kwd>
			<kwd>Ecological zones</kwd>
			<kwd>Ghana</kwd>
		</kwdg>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Background</p>
					</st><p>In 2008, artemether - lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin - piperaquine (DHAP) were added to artesunate - amodiaquine (AS-AQ) as first-line drugs for uncomplicated malaria in Ghana. The introduction of new drugs calls for continuous monitoring of these drugs to provide timely information on trends of their efficacy and safety to enhance timely evidence-based decision making by the National Malaria Control Programme. In this regard, the therapeutic efficacy of AL was monitored from September 2010 to April 2011 in four sentinel sites representing the three main ecological zones of the country.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Methods</p>
					</st><p>The study was a one-arm prospective evaluation of clinical and parasitological responses to directly observed treatment for uncomplicated malaria among children aged 6&#8201;months to 59&#8201;months using the 2009  WHO protocol for surveillance of anti-malarial drug efficacy. Children recruited into the study received weight-based 20/120&#8201;mg AL at 0, 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60&#8201;hrs. Parasitaemia levels were assessed on days 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, and at any time a study child was brought to the clinic with fever.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Results</p>
					</st><p>A total of 175 children were enrolled into the study: 56 in the savanna zone, 78 in the forest zone and 41 in the coastal zone. Per-protocol analysis showed that the overall PCR-corrected cure rates on day 14 and day 28 were 96.5% (95% CI: 92.1, 98.6) and 95.4% (95% CI: 90.3, 98.0), respectively, with statistically significant differences between the ecological zones. The 90.4%&#8201;day-28 cure rate observed in the savannah zone (95% CI: 78.2, 96.4) was significantly the lowest compared with 100% (95% CI: 93.2, 99.9) in the forest zone and 93.8% (95% CI: 77.8, 98.9) in the coastal zone (<it>P</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.017). Fever and parasite clearance were slower among children enrolled in the savannah zone. Gametocytaemia after day-3 post-treatment was rare in all the zones.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusions</p>
					</st><p>The study has shown that AL remains efficacious in Ghana with significant ecologic zonal differences. The savannah zone may be a potential zone for any emergence of resistant alleles as a result of the slower parasite clearance observed in the zone.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st><p>Malaria remains one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is estimated that in 2010 there were approximately 216 million cases of malaria worldwide, of which 81% were in Africa. In the same year, malaria accounted for approximately 655,000 deaths worldwide, of which 91% were in Africa <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In 2010, malaria was estimated to account for 38.2% of all out patient attendance; 34.9% of all admissions; and 33.7% of under-five mortality in Ghana <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>The current control strategy in Ghana has case management based on prompt recognition and adequate treatment as its main focus. Chloroquine had been the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Ghana for decades until 2001, when results from studies conducted in six sentinel sites (between 1998 and 2001) showed treatment failure rates of between 8.6% and 26.8% <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. At a consensus-building workshop in August 2003, Ghana decided to change her anti-malarial drug policy based on the evidence provided by the 2001 studies, among others. The focus of treatment options was the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) to slow down the spread of drug resistance. This was recommended because of the rapid effect on fever and parasite clearance as well as a reduction in gametocyte carriage rates <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In January 2005, Ghana adopted the artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) combination as the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAP) were added to AS-AQ as first-line drugs for uncomplicated malaria in Ghana in 2008 <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>The introduction of new drugs calls for continuous monitoring of these drugs to provide timely information on trends of their efficacy and safety to enhance timely evidence-based decision making by the National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP). In this regard, a surveillance system, coordinated by the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), was established in 2005 to provide data on first-line anti-malarial drugs from 10 sentinel sites across the country. This paper covers the therapeutic efficacy of AL across three ecological zones in Ghana during the period September 2010 to April 2011 using the 2009 WHO protocol for surveillance of anti-malarial drug efficacy <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Methods</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Study sites</p>
				</st><p>The AL study was conducted in four of the 10 sentinel sites representing the three main ecological zones of Ghana. These were Navrongo War Memorial Hospital in the savannah zone; Bekwai Municipal Hospital and Begoro Government Hospital in the forest zone; and Ewim Health Centre in the coastal zone.</p><p>The Navrongo War Memorial Hospital is located in the Kassena Nakana East district in the Upper East region of Ghana. The Kassena Nankana East district has an estimated population of 109,944 with an annual average rainfall of 950&#8201;mm. Malaria in the district is perennial with marked seasonal variation. The peak transmission season coincides with the major rains between June and October. The Bekwai Municipal Hospital is located in the Bekwai Municipality in the Ashanti region of Ghana. The Bekwai Municipality has an estimated population of 118,024. Annual rainfall in the municipality is 1,600 &#8211; 1,800&#8201;mm with double maxima rainfall in May and October each year. Malaria transmission in the Municipality is intense and perennial. The Begoro Government Hospital is located in the Fanteakwa district in the Eastern region of Ghana. The Fanteakwa district has an estimated population of 108,614. Annual rainfall in the district is 150 &#8211; 2,000&#8201;mm with double maxima rainfall in June and October each year. Malaria transmission in the district is intense and perennial. The Ewim Health Centre is located within the Cape-Coast Metropolis in the Central region of Ghana. The Cape-Coast metropolis has an estimated population of 169,894. Annual rainfall in the metropolis is 750 &#8211; 1,000&#8201;mm with double maxima rainfall in June and December each year. Malaria transmission in the metropolis is perennial <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Study population</p>
				</st><p>The study population involved all children aged between six and 59&#8201;months presenting at the Out-Patient Department (OPD) of a study site clinic with symptoms suggestive of malaria. Once a clinical diagnosis of malaria was made by the study Nurse, samples of blood were obtained from a finger prick to prepare thick and thin smears for malaria microscopy and haemoglobin level determination. Children meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited into the study and followed up for a minimum of 14&#8201;days and a maximum of 28&#8201;days. Briefly, the inclusion criteria included axillary temperature&#8201;&#8805;&#8201;37.5&#176;C or history of fever during the past 24&#8201;hrs; mono-infection with <it>Plasmodium falciparum</it>; parasite count ranging between 1,000 and 250,000 per &#956;l; haemoglobin level&#8201;&gt;&#8201;5&#8201;g/dl; absence of signs/symptoms of severe malaria; and parent&#8217;s willingness to give their consent.</p><p>Children recruited into the study received weight-based 20/120&#8201;mg AL (Coartem&#174; &#8211; batch number x1435 supplied by WHO, Geneva) at 0, 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60&#8201;hrs. All treatments were given under direct observation by a study nurse and children were observed for 30&#8201;minutes to ascertain retention of medicine. Children who vomited during the observation period were re-treated with the same dose of medicine and observed for an additional 30&#8201;minutes. Children with repeated vomiting were given parenteral therapy with quinine as per national standard treatment guidelines and excluded from the study. All children were allowed use of antipyretics. Children who showed signs/symptoms of severe malaria, had serious adverse events or required blood transfusion were withdrawn from the study.</p><p>Outpatient follow-up visits were scheduled for days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 after treatment (day of treatment was counted as day-0). At each visit to the clinic, children were examined physically and information on symptoms, axillary temperature, and respiratory rate recorded on a Case Record Form (CRF). Parasitaemia levels (asexual and sexual) were assessed on days 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, and any day within the 28-day follow-up period that a child is brought to the clinic with fever. Thick and thin smears were stained with 3% Giemsa for 30&#8211;45&#8201;minutes for quantification of asexual parasites against 200 white blood cells using a hand tally counter. Sexual parasite counts were done per 1,000 white blood cells. Parasitaemia levels were expressed per &#956;l blood assuming white blood cell count of 8,000 per &#956;l blood. A smear was declared negative when examination of 100 thick-film fields did not show presence of asexual parasites. For quality control purposes, all blood slides were read by two qualified independent microscopists, and discordant readings were re-examined by a third qualified independent microscopist. Discordance was defined as differences between the first and second microscopists regarding presence/absence of asexual or sexual parasites; species diagnosis; and day-0 counts meeting the inclusion criterion of 1,000 &#8211; 250,000 per &#956;l blood. The first or second reading was taken as final depending on whichever agrees with the third reading. Filter paper blots were obtained on day-0 and at recurrence of parasitaemia for PCR genotyping, and merozoite surface proteins 1 and 2 (<it>msp1, msp2</it>), and glutamate-rich protein (<it>glurp</it>) used to distinguish between re-infection and recrudescence. Haemoglobin levels were assessed for all study children on days 0, 14, and 28.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Data analysis</p>
				</st><p>Per protocol analysis was applied in this study. Primary outcomes were treatment outcomes on day-14 and day-28 for the different ecological zones based on the WHO 2009 criteria: Early treatment failure (ETF), Late Parasitological Failure (LPF), Late Clinical Failure (LCF), and Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Secondary outcomes were patterns of fever and parasite clearance assessed for the different ecological zones using proportions (with 95% CI) of children febrile/with temperature&#8201;&#8805;&#8201;37.5&#176;C or parasitaemic within the follow-up period. Haematological responses were also assessed using mean haemoglobin levels on day-14 and day-28. Proportions were compared using chi-square and Fisher&#8217;s exact tests. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student&#8217;s t-test while skewed distributions such as parasite counts were log transformed before using the normal approximation. Differences were considered significant at <it>p</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.05.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Ethics</p>
				</st><p>The Institutional Review Board of the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, reviewed and approved the study. Written informed consent was obtained from each parent/guardian at the start of the study. Each parent/guardian was informed of the objectives, methods, anticipated benefits and potential hazards of the study. They were also informed that they were at liberty to withdraw their children from the study at any time without penalty.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Baseline characteristics</p>
				</st><p>Of the 360 children screened, 175 (48.6%) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled into the study: 56 in the savannah zone, 78 in the forest zone, and 41 in the coastal zone. Characteristics of patients at enrolment are presented in Table&#8201;<tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. The mean axillary temperature was significantly lowest among patients enrolled from the coastal zone. The other baseline characteristics assessed (i.e. male/female ratio, median age, geometric parasite density, and mean haemoglobin levels) did not show any significant difference between the ecological zones. There were no reports of previous anti-malarial intake prior to enrollment in all the three ecological zones. Out of the 175 patients enrolled, a cumulative total of 169 (96.6%) and 163 (93.1%) were assessed on day-14 and day-28, respectively, giving a total of six patients who were neither assessed on day-14 nor day-28. Three of these patients were lost to follow-up by day-3; 1 was withdrawn because of danger sign on day-1; 1 was withdrawn because of danger sign on day-2; and 1 withdrawn because of failure to complete treatment. The day-1 danger sign (patient from the coastal zone) was convulsion whilst the day-2 danger sign (patient from the forest zone) was excessive vomiting. Both children with danger signs were detained and given supportive treatment until they recovered.</p>
				<table id="T1">
					<title>
						<p>Table 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>
							<b>Demographic, clinical, parasitological, and haematological characteristics of patients on day of enrolment</b>
						</p>
					</caption>
					<tgroup align="left" cols="6">
						<colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c4" colnum="4" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c5" colnum="5" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c6" colnum="6" colwidth="1*"/>
						<thead valign="top">
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>
										<b>Characteristic</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>
										<b>Total (N&#8201;=&#8201;175)</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3" nameend="c5" namest="c3" rowsep="1">
									<p>
										<b>Ecological zone</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c6">
									<p>
										<b>p-value</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>
										<b>Savannah n&#8201;=&#8201;56</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>
										<b>Forest n&#8201;=&#8201;78</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>
										<b>Coastal n&#8201;=&#8201;41</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c6"/>
							</row>
						</thead>
						<tfoot>
							<p>
								<sup>a</sup> Geometric mean parasite count.</p>
						</tfoot>
						<tbody valign="top">
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Male/Female</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>85/90</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>30/26</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>39/39</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>16/25</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c6">
									<p>0.346</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Median age in months (range)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>32 (6 &#8211; 59)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>35 (9 &#8211; 55)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>33 (6 &#8211; 59)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>24 (7 &#8211; 59)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c6">
									<p>0.077</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Mean axillary temperature in&#176;C (95% CI)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>38.0 (37.5, 38.4)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>38.0 (37.7, 38.2)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>38.5 (38.3, 38.7)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>37.0 (35.1, 38.9)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c6">
									<p>0.039</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>GM Parasite count/&#956;l <sup>a</sup> (range)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>35009 (1240, 233608)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>22775 (1240, 198440)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>40983 (1423, 197080)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>46669 (6647, 233608)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c6">
									<p>0.115</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Mean Haemoglobin level in g/dl (95% CI)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>10.0 (9.2, 10.7)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>9.4 (8.9, 9.9)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>10.3 (8.7, 12.0)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>10.1 (9.6, 10.5)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c6">
									<p>0.557</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</tbody>
					</tgroup>
				</table>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Primary outcomes</p>
				</st><p>Out of 169 evaluable patients assessed on day-14, 163 or 96.5% (95% CI: 92.1, 98.6) showed an adequate clinical and parasitological response. Five of the six treatment failures were early treatment failures that occurred in the savannah zone. The only late parasitological failure observed on day-14 occurred in the coastal zone and was confirmed by PCR (Table&#8201;<tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>).</p>
				<table id="T2">
					<title>
						<p>Table 2</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>
							<b>Treatment outcomes by ecological zone (pcr-uncorrected)</b>
						</p>
					</caption>
					<tgroup align="left" cols="5">
						<colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c4" colnum="4" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c5" colnum="5" colwidth="1*"/>
						<thead valign="top">
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1" morerows="1">
									<p>
										<b>Characteristic</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2" morerows="1">
									<p>
										<b>Total (N&#8201;=&#8201;175)</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3" nameend="c5" namest="c3">
									<p>
										<b>Ecological zone</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>
										<b>Savannah n&#8201;=&#8201;56</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>
										<b>Forest n&#8201;=&#8201;78</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>
										<b>Coastal n&#8201;=&#8201;41</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</thead>
						<tfoot>
							<p>
								<sup>a</sup> Not assessed.</p>
						</tfoot>
						<tbody valign="top">
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Classification (Day 14)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry colname="c2"/>
								<entry colname="c3"/>
								<entry colname="c4"/>
								<entry colname="c5"/>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>ETF</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>5</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>5</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>LCF</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>LPF</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>1</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>1</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>ACPR</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>163</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>51</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>75</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>37</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>NA<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>6</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>3</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>3</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Classification (Day 28)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5"/>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>ETF</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>5</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>5</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>LCF</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>5</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>2</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>3</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>LPF</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>10</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>2</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>3</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>5</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>ACPR</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>144</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>47</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>67</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>30</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>NA<sup>a</sup>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>11</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>0</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>8</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c5">
									<p>3</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</tbody>
					</tgroup>
				</table><p>For day-28 evaluable patients, 47 out of 56 or 83.9% (95% CI: 71.2, 92.0) in the savannah zone; 67 out of 70 or 95.7% (95% CI: 87.2, 98.9) in the forest zone; and 30 out of 38 or 79% (95% CI: 62.2, 89.9) in the coastal zone showed adequate clinical and parasitological response (Table&#8201;<tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>). Pcr-corrected outcomes on day-28 showed an overall cure rate of 95.4% (95% CI: 90.3, 98.0). Cure rate within the savannah zone was significantly the lowest (90.4%; 95% CI: 78.2, 96.4) compared with 100% (95% CI: 93.2, 99.9) in the forest zone and 93.8% (95% CI: 77.8, 98.9) in the coastal zone (<it>p</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.017) (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F1">1</figr>).</p>
				<fig id="F1"><title><p>Figure 1</p></title><caption><p>Day 28 pcr-corrected ACPR/Cure rate (including 95% CI) for evaluable patients by ecological zone</p></caption><text>
   <p>
      <b>Day 28 pcr-corrected ACPR/Cure rate (including 95% CI) for evaluable patients by ecological zone.</b>
   </p>
</text><graphic file="1475-2875-11-388-1"/></fig>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Secondary outcomes</p>
				</st><p>Generally, proportion of children who were febrile during the first follow-up week decreased with day within the forest and coastal zones. Children in the two zones remained afebrile on day-3 and day-7 post-treatment. Although the proportion of febrile children in the savannah zone significantly decreased from 100% on day-0 to 1.8% (95% CI: 0.1, 10.8) on day-2, the proportion increased to 18.2% (95% CI: 9.5, 31.4) on day-3 before decreasing again to 7.8% (95% CI: 2.5, 19.8) on day-7. Febrile cases were, therefore, recorded on all days within the first follow-up week in the savannah zone. The proportion of children still febrile on day-1 post-treatment was significantly higher in the savannah zone (42.9%; 95% CI: 30.0, 56.7) compared with the forest zone (16.7%; 95% CI: 9.5, 27.2) and the coastal zone (10.5%; 95% CI: 3.4, 25.7) (<it>p</it>&#8201;&lt;&#8201;0.001) (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F2">2</figr>).</p>
				<fig id="F2"><title><p>Figure 2</p></title><caption><p>Proportion of patients with fever during first follow-up week by ecological zone</p></caption><text>
   <p>
      <b>Proportion of patients with fever during first follow-up week by ecological zone.</b>
   </p>
</text><graphic file="1475-2875-11-388-2"/></fig><p>Regarding parasitaemia, all children within the forest and coastal zones cleared their parasites by day-2 post-treatment, and none of them was parasitaemic on day-3 and day-7. In the savannah zone, 8/55 or 14.5% (95% CI: 6.9, 27.2) were parasitaemic on day-2. However, no child was parasitaemic on day-3 and day-7 (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F3">3</figr>). A further analysis of the children who were parasitaemic on day-2 showed that 5/8 (62.5%; 95% CI: 25.9, 89.8) had parasite count greater than the day-0 count (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F4">4</figr>) and were thus classified as ETF as per protocol. All the children became aparasitaemic on day-3 without any rescue treatment to those classified as ETF (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F4">4</figr>). Parasite recurrence was observed on day-21 in one of the eight children who were parasitaemic on day-2.</p>
				<fig id="F3"><title><p>Figure 3</p></title><caption><p>Proportion of patients with parasites during first follow-up week by ecological zone</p></caption><text>
   <p>
      <b>Proportion of patients with parasites during first follow-up week by ecological zone.</b>
   </p>
</text><graphic file="1475-2875-11-388-3"/></fig>
				<fig id="F4"><title><p>Figure 4</p></title><caption><p>Pattern of parasite clearance among children parasitaemic on day-2 in the Savannah zone</p></caption><text>
   <p><b>Pattern of parasite clearance among children parasitaemic on day</b>-<b>2 in the Savannah zone.</b></p>
</text><graphic file="1475-2875-11-388-4"/></fig><p>At enrolment, gametocytaemia was prevalent only in the savannah zone at a rate of 7.1% (4/56). By day-2 post-treatment, prevalence of gametocytaemia had declined to 0% and remained so in the zone on days 3, 7, and 21. Days 14 and 28 in the savannah zone had only 1 child (1.8%) with gametocytes. Gametocytaemia was absent on all follow-up days among children enrolled in the forest zone. For children enrolled in the coastal zone gametocytaemia was prevalent on day-2 post-treatment at a rate of 10.5% (4/38), halved by day-3 at a rate of 5.3% (2/38), declined to 0% by day-7, and remained same throughout the remaining follow-up days (Figure&#8201;<figr fid="F5">5</figr>).</p>
				<fig id="F5"><title><p>Figure 5</p></title><caption><p>Gametocyte carriage rate during the follow-up period by ecological zone</p></caption><text>
   <p>
      <b>Gametocyte carriage rate during the follow-up period by ecological zone.</b>
   </p>
</text><graphic file="1475-2875-11-388-5"/></fig><p>There were no significant differences between mean haemoglobin concentration assessed prior to treatment on day-0 and mean haemoglobin concentration assessed on day-14 and day-28 post-treatment among children in the savannah and forest zones. For children in the coastal zone, mean haemoglobin concentration significantly increased from 10.1&#8201;g/dl (95% CI: 9.6, 10.5) on day-0 to 11.0&#8201;g/dl (95% CI: 10.6, 11.4) on day-28 (<it>p</it>&#8201;=&#8201;0.004) (Table&#8201;<tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>).</p>
				<table id="T3">
					<title>
						<p>Table 3</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>
							<b>Changes in mean haemoglobin levels by ecological zone</b>
						</p>
					</caption>
					<tgroup align="left" cols="4">
						<colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c2" colnum="2" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c3" colnum="3" colwidth="1*"/>
						<colspec align="center" colname="c4" colnum="4" colwidth="1*"/>
						<thead valign="top">
							<row>
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2" nameend="c4" namest="c2" rowsep="1">
									<p>
										<b>Ecological zone</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1"/>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>
										<b>Savannah</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>
										<b>Forest</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>
										<b>Coastal</b>
									</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</thead>
						<tbody valign="top">
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Day 0 Mean Hb (95% CI)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>9.4 (8.9, 9.9)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>10.3 (8.7, 12.0)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>10.1 (9.6, 10.5)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Day 14 Mean Hb (95% CI)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>9.6 (9.2, 10.0)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>10.0 (9.7, 10.3)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>10.6 (10.2, 11.0)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
							<row rowsep="1">
								<entry colname="c1">
									<p>Day 28 Mean Hb (95% CI)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c2">
									<p>10.0 (9.6, 10.4)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c3">
									<p>10.6 (10.3, 10.9)</p>
								</entry>
								<entry align="center" colname="c4">
									<p>11.0 (10.6, 11.4)</p>
								</entry>
							</row>
						</tbody>
					</tgroup>
				</table>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st><p>Following the inclusion of artemether - lumefantrine combination as one of the first-line drugs for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Ghana in 2008 <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, there was the need to study its therapeutic efficacy in four sentinel sites representing the three main ecological zones of the country during the 2010/2011 surveillance period.</p><p>The study has shown that the overall PCR-corrected cure rate for Ghana is 95.4% (95% CI: 90.3, 98.0) with the savannah zone showing a significantly lower rate of 90.4% (95% CI: 78.2, 96.4). The over 90% cure rate of AL in Ghana is comparable with findings from other studies in Africa within the past decade <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, and suggests that Ghana as a whole has not reached the 10% cut-off failure rate necessary for the review of AL as one of the first line drugs in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in the country <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. However, the 9.6% early treatment failure rate observed in the savannah zone is worrying and suggests the need for conduct of pharmacokinetic studies during subsequent efficacy studies to determine the adequacy of plasma drug concentrations, which is necessary for describing treatment failures <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Fever and parasite clearance were slower among children enrolled in the savannah zone. Whereas no child was febrile on day-3 and day-7 in the forest and coastal zones, febrile cases were reported on all days among children in the savannah zone during the first follow-up week. The proportion of children still febrile on day-1 post-treatment was significantly highest in the savannah zone (42.9%; 95% CI: 30.0, 56.7) compared with the forest zone (16.7%; 95% CI: 9.5, 27.2) and the coastal zone (10.5%; 95% CI: 3.4, 25.7) (<it>p&#8201;&lt;</it>&#8201;0.001). Additionally, 8/55 or 14.5% (95% CI: 6.9, 27.2) of the children enrolled in the savannah zone were parasitaemic on day-2 post-treatment whilst no child was parasitaemic on the same day in the forest and coastal zones. Out of the 8 parasitaemic children 5 (62.5%; 95% CI: 25.9, 89.8) had parasite count greater than the day-0 count but remained aparasitaemic on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 post-treatment without any rescue treatment. The rapid rise in asexual parasitaemia after commencement of ACT treatment has been reported in Nigeria and attributed to a possible larger load of sequestered parasites in deep tissues in some patients. In the Nigeria study, parasitaemia levels peaked at one hour after the first dose of AL, and by 16&#8201;hours post-treatment all parasites had been cleared among children with initial rise in parasitaemia <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. In our study, total asexual parasite clearance for children with increased parasitaemia on day-2 was achieved on day-3. This observation, coupled with the known phenomenon of parasite mobilization from deep tissues by ACT raises concern about the WHO criteria for ETF classification in relation to parasite densities <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. It may be worthwhile shifting the criteria from day-2 to day-3 post-treatment in areas of intense transmission. This notwithstanding, the delayed clearance of fever and parasites in the savannah zone need to be further studied taking into account the possible effects of ACT usage on parasite dynamics within the population <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Pre-treatment gametocytaemia was prevalent only in the savannah zone (7.1%) and declined to 0% by day-2 post-treatment whilst gametocytaemia was prevalent on day-2 post-treatment in the coastal zone (10.5%), halved by day-3 (5.3%), and declined to 0% by day-7 post-treatment. This finding suggests that ACT remains efficacious in gametocyte clearance in Ghana. The efficacy in gametocyte clearance has the advantage of potentially slowing down the transmission of resistant alleles <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p><p>Post-treatment mean haemoglobin concentration was significantly higher than pre-treatment concentration in the coastal zone but not the forest and savannah zones. This finding suggests that the therapeutic efficacy of AL resulting from rapid parasite clearance may not necessarily translate into significant post-treatment increases in haemoglobin concentrations during a 28-day follow up period. A couple of studies in Africa have reported non-significant post-treatment increases in haemoglobin concentrations with AL treatment during a 28-day follow-up period of patients treated for acute uncomplicated malaria <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> whilst a couple of studies in Ghana have reported significant increases during the same follow-up period <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusions</p>
			</st><p>There is evidence to show that AL remains efficacious in Ghana with significant ecologic zonal differences. The savannah zone may be a potential zone for any emergence of resistant alleles as a result of the slower parasite clearance observed in the zone. Pharmacokinetic studies will be useful in future anti-malarial drug resistance surveillance activities in Ghana to better describe treatment failures. Ghana&#8217;s policy of multiple first-line therapy is in the right direction, and needs to be supported by all stakeholders as it delays the emergence and slows spread of drug resistance <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Furthermore, the WHO criteria for ETF may need to be reviewed following the observation that all 5 children classified as ETF on the basis of parasite count on day-2 being greater than parasite count on day-0 cleared all parasites on day-3, without any rescue treatment, and remained aparasitaemic during the follow-up period.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Competing interests</p>
			</st><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Authors&#8217; contributions</p>
			</st><p>BA and KK conceived and designed the study. ND and NQ carried out molecular genetic studies to distinguish between re-infection and recrudescence. BA and LQ coordinated the study. BA and KK participated in the data analysis. BA drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st><p>The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Constance Bart Plange (National Malaria Control Programme Manager), Dr. Felicia Owusu-Antwi (WHO, Ghana), Dr. Jackson Sillah (WHO-AFRO), Dr. Marian Warsame (WHO, Geneva), and study teams in the 4 sentinel sites. We also wish to thank Messrs John Fenteng and Charles Attiogbe of the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research for their technical assistance. The study received financial support from the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) through the National Malaria Control Programme and the U.S President&#8217;s Malaria Initiative (PMI) through WHO, Ghana.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp><bibl id="B1"><aug><au><cnm>WHO</cnm></au></aug><source>World Malaria Report 2011</source><publisher>Geneva: World Health Organization</publisher><pubdate>2011</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B2"><aug><au><cnm>Ministry of Health</cnm></au></aug><source>National Malaria Control Programme 2010 Annual Report</source></bibl><bibl id="B3"><aug><au><snm>Koram</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au></aug><source>Mapping response of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine and other antimalarial drugs in Ghana, Project ID 980034</source><publisher>Accra: NMIMR</publisher><pubdate>2003</pubdate><note>Final report submitted to MIM/TDR</note></bibl><bibl id="B4"><aug><au><cnm>WHO</cnm></au></aug><source>Monitoring Antimalarial Drug Resistance: Report of a WHO Consultation. 3&#8211;5 December 2001</source><publisher>Geneva: World Health Organization</publisher><pubdate>2002</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Comparative efficacy of antimalarial drugs including ACTs in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria among children under 5&#8201;years in Ghana</p></title><aug><au><snm>Koram</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Abuaku</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Duah</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Quashie</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Acta Trop</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>95</volume><fpage>194</fpage><lpage>203</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.06.018</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16054584</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><aug><au><cnm>Ghana Health Service</cnm></au></aug><source>Final Draft. Antimalarial Drug Policy for Ghana</source><publisher>Accra: GHS</publisher><pubdate>2004</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B7"><aug><au><cnm>Ministry of Health</cnm></au></aug><source>Guidelines for case management of malaria in Ghana</source><publisher>Accra: MOH</publisher><pubdate>2009</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B8"><aug><au><cnm>WHO</cnm></au></aug><source>Methods for surveillance of antimalarial drug efficacy</source><publisher>Geneva: World Health Organization</publisher><pubdate>2009</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B9"><aug><au><cnm>Ghana Statistical Service</cnm></au></aug><source>2010 population &amp; housing census. Summary report of final results</source><publisher>GSS</publisher><pubdate>2012</pubdate><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">23213178</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><aug><au><cnm>Ghana</cnm></au></aug><source>Duration of the Malaria Transmission Season</source><note>
   <url>http://www.mara.org.za/pdfmaps/GhaSeasonality.PDF</url>
</note></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Severe falciparum malaria in young children of the Kassena-Nankana district of northern Ghana</p></title><aug><au><snm>Oduro</snm><fnm>AR</fnm></au><au><snm>Koram</snm><fnm>KA</fnm></au><au><snm>Rogers</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au><au><snm>Atuguba</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Ansah</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au><au><snm>Anyorigiya</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Ansah</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Anto</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Mensah</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Hodgson</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Nkrumah</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au></aug><source>Malar J</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>6</volume><fpage>96</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-6-96</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1950879</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17662142</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Malaria transmission in two rural communities in the forest zone of Ghana</p></title><aug><au><snm>Abonuusum</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Owusu-Daako</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Tannich</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>May</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Garms</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Kruppa</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Parasitol Res</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>108</volume><fpage>1465</fpage><lpage>1471</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00436-010-2195-1</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21153839</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Genetic diversity of polymorphic vaccine candidate antigens (apical membrane antigen-1, merozoite surface protein-3, and erythrocyte binding antigen-175) in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Western and Central Africa</p></title><aug><au><snm>Soulama</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Bigoga</snm><fnm>JD</fnm></au><au><snm>Ndiaye</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Bougouma</snm><fnm>EC</fnm></au><au><snm>Quagraine</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Casimiro</snm><fnm>PN</fnm></au><au><snm>Stedman</snm><fnm>TT</fnm></au><au><snm>Sirima</snm><fnm>SB</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Trop Med Hyg</source><pubdate>2011</pubdate><volume>84</volume><fpage>276</fpage><lpage>284</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0365</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3029182</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21292899</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Amodiaquine-artesunate vs artemether-lumefantrine for uncomplicated malaria in Ghanaian children: a randomized efficacy and safety trial with one year follow-up</p></title><aug><au><snm>Adjei</snm><fnm>GO</fnm></au><au><snm>Kurtzhals</snm><fnm>JA</fnm></au><au><snm>Rodrigues</snm><fnm>OP</fnm></au><au><snm>Alifrangis</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Hoegberg</snm><fnm>LC</fnm></au><au><snm>Kitcher</snm><fnm>ED</fnm></au><au><snm>Badoe</snm><fnm>EV</fnm></au><au><snm>Lamptey</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Goka</snm><fnm>BQ</fnm></au></aug><source>Malar J</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>7</volume><fpage>127</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-7-127</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2478668</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18620577</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>High efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations (artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate plus amodiaquine) for acute uncomplicated malaria in Ibadan, Nigeria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Falade</snm><fnm>CO</fnm></au><au><snm>Ogundele</snm><fnm>AO</fnm></au><au><snm>Yusuf</snm><fnm>BO</fnm></au><au><snm>Ademowo</snm><fnm>OG</fnm></au><au><snm>Ladipo</snm><fnm>SM</fnm></au></aug><source>Trop Med Int Health</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>635</fpage><lpage>643</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02043.x</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18346028</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Efficacy and tolerability of four antimalarial combinations in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Senegal</p></title><aug><au><snm>Faye</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Ndiaye</snm><fnm>JL</fnm></au><au><snm>Ndiaye</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Dieng</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Faye</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Gaye</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au></aug><source>Malar J</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>6</volume><fpage>80</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-6-80</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1919387</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17570848</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>A randomized trial of artesunate-sulfamethoxypyrazine-pyrimethamine versus artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mali</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sagara</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au><au><snm>Dicko</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Djimde</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Guindo</snm><fnm>O</fnm></au><au><snm>Kone</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Tolo</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Thera</snm><fnm>MA</fnm></au><au><snm>Sogoba</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Fofana</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Ouattara</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Sissoko</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Jansen</snm><fnm>HF</fnm></au><au><snm>Doumbo</snm><fnm>OK</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Trop Med Hyg</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>75</volume><fpage>630</fpage><lpage>636</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17038684</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Therapeutic efficacy and effects of artemether-lumefantrine and amodiaquine-sulfalene-pyrimethamine on gametocyte carriage in children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in Southwestern Nigeria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sowunmi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Gbotosho</snm><fnm>GO</fnm></au><au><snm>Happi</snm><fnm>CT</fnm></au><au><snm>Adedeji</snm><fnm>AA</fnm></au><au><snm>Fehintola</snm><fnm>FA</fnm></au><au><snm>Folarin</snm><fnm>OA</fnm></au><au><snm>Tambo</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Fateye</snm><fnm>BA</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Trop Med Hyg</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>77</volume><fpage>235</fpage><lpage>241</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17690392</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>A randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of artemether-lumfantrine (Coartem&#174;) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Rwanda</p></title><aug><au><snm>Fanello</snm><fnm>CI</fnm></au><au><snm>Karema</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Doren</snm><fnm>WV</fnm></au><au><snm>Overmeir</snm><fnm>CV</fnm></au><au><snm>Ngamije</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>D&#8217;Alessandro</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au></aug><source>Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>101</volume><fpage>344</fpage><lpage>350</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.06.010</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">17005222</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><title><p>High efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations (artesunate + amodiaquine and artemether + lumefantrine) in Caala, Central Angola</p></title><aug><au><snm>Guthmann</snm><fnm>JP</fnm></au><au><snm>Cohuet</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Rigutto</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Fortes</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Saraiva</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au><au><snm>Kiguli</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Kyomuhendo</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Francis</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Noel</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Mulemba</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Balkan</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Am J Trop Med Hyg</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>143</fpage><lpage>145</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16837721</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Artemether-lumefantrine treatment failure despite adequate lumefantrine day 7 concentration in a traveler with Plasmodium falciparum malaria after returning from Tanzania</p></title><aug><au><snm>F&#228;rnert</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Ursing</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Tolfvenstam</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Rono</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Karlsson</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Sparrelid</snm><fnm>E</fnm></au><au><snm>Lindeg&#229;rdh</snm><fnm>N</fnm></au></aug><source>Malar J</source><pubdate>2012</pubdate><volume>11</volume><fpage>176</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-11-176</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3416680</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">22632033</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Early variations in Plasmodium falciparum dynamics in Nigerian children after treatment with two artemisinin-based combinations: implications on delayed parasite clearance</p></title><aug><au><snm>Michael</snm><fnm>OS</fnm></au><au><snm>Gbotosho</snm><fnm>GO</fnm></au><au><snm>Folarin</snm><fnm>OA</fnm></au><au><snm>Okuboyejo</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Sowunmi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Oduola</snm><fnm>AM</fnm></au><au><snm>Happi</snm><fnm>CT</fnm></au></aug><source>Malar J</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>335</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-9-335</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">3152768</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21092220</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Artemisinin derivatives for treating severe malaria</p></title><aug><au><snm>McIntosh</snm><fnm>HM</fnm></au><au><snm>Olliaro</snm><fnm>P</fnm></au></aug><source>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>2</volume><fpage>CD000527</fpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10796551</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B24"><title><p>Factors contributing to delay in parasite clearance in uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children</p></title><aug><au><snm>Sowunmi</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Adewoye</snm><fnm>EO</fnm></au><au><snm>Gbotsho</snm><fnm>GO</fnm></au><au><snm>Happi</snm><fnm>CT</fnm></au><au><snm>Sijuade</snm><fnm>A</fnm></au><au><snm>Folarin</snm><fnm>OA</fnm></au><au><snm>Okuboyejo</snm><fnm>TM</fnm></au><au><snm>Michael</snm><fnm>OS</fnm></au></aug><source>Malar J</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>53</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-9-53</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2834701</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20156350</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B25"><aug><au><cnm>WHO</cnm></au></aug><source>Antimalarial drug combination therapy. Report of a WHO Technical consultation, 4 &#8211; 5 April 2001</source><publisher>Geneva: World Health Organization</publisher><pubdate>2001</pubdate></bibl><bibl id="B26"><title><p>Safety and efficacy of lumefantrine-artemether (Coartem&#174;) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zambian adults</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mulenga</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>JP</snm><fnm>Vg</fnm></au><au><snm>Mwananyanda</snm><fnm>L</fnm></au><au><snm>Chalwe</snm><fnm>V</fnm></au><au><snm>Moerman</snm><fnm>F</fnm></au><au><snm>Chilengi</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Overmeir</snm><fnm>CV</fnm></au><au><snm>Dujardin</snm><fnm>JC</fnm></au><au><snm>D&#8217;Alessandro</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au></aug><source>Malar J</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>5</volume><fpage>73</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-5-73</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">1579224</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16923176</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B27"><title><p>An open label, randomized trial of artesunate + amodiaquine, artesunate + chlorproguanil-dapsone and artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Owusu-Agyei</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Asante</snm><fnm>KP</fnm></au><au><snm>Owusu</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Adjuik</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au><au><snm>Amenga-Etego</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Dosoo</snm><fnm>DK</fnm></au><au><snm>Gyapong</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au><au><snm>Greenwood</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au><au><snm>Chandramohan</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au></aug><source>PLoS ONE</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>3</volume><fpage>e2530</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0002530</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2430614</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18575626</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B28"><title><p>Benefits of using multiple first-line therapies against malaria</p></title><aug><au><snm>Boni</snm><fnm>MF</fnm></au><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au><au><snm>Laxminarayan</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>105</volume><fpage>14216</fpage><lpage>14221</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0804628105</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2544604</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">18780786</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B29"><title><p>Prospective strategies to delay the evolution of anti-malarial drug resistance: weighing the uncertainty</p></title><aug><au><snm>Smith</snm><fnm>DL</fnm></au><au><snm>Klein</snm><fnm>EY</fnm></au><au><snm>Mckenzie</snm><fnm>FE</fnm></au><au><snm>Laxminarayan</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Malar J</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>9</volume><fpage>217</fpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1475-2875-9-217</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">2916917</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">20653960</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>