Jecker, N.S.Atuire, C.A.2022-06-012022-06-012022https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13028http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/38107Research ArticleThis paper argues for global sharing of COVID‐19 treatments during the COVID‐19pandemic and beyond based on principles of global solidarity. It starts by distinguishing two types of COVID‐19 treatments and models sharing strategies for each in small‐group scenarios, contrasting groups that are solidaristic with those composed of self‐interest maximizers to show the appeal of solidaristic reasoning. It then extends the analysis,arguing that a similar logic should apply within and between nations. To further elaborate global solidarity, the paper distinguishes morally voluntary, sliding‐scale, and mandatory versions. It argues for an all‐hands‐on‐deck approach and gives examples to illustrate. The paper concludes that during the COVID‐19 crisis, global solidarity is a core value, and global sharing of COVID‐19 treatments should be considered a duty of justice, not of charity.enallocationCOVID‐19ethicsglobal healthjusticesolidarityArticle