EX LIBRIS G ~ 2:; ~ I a~ c, ~ .. E. F RAN K LIN FRAZIER B E QUE S T THE WORLD AND AFRICA BY THE SAME AUTHOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE AFRICAN SLAVE-TRADE TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Harvard Historical Studies, No. I, I896) ATLANTA UNIVERSITY STUDIES OF THE NEGRO PROBLEM (eighteen numbers, z896-I9z4) THE PHILADELPHIA NEGRO (Publication of the Unioersity of Pennsvluariia series on Political Economy and Public Law, No. I4, z899) SOULS OF BLACK FOLK Essays and Sketches, I90) JOHN BROWN (American Crisis Biographies, I909) QUEST OF THE SILVER FLEECE a. novel, I9II THE NEGRO I9I5 DARKWATER: VOICES FROM WITHIN THE VEIL I920 THE GIFT OF BLACK FOLK: THE NEGRO IN THE MAKING OF AMERICA I924 DARK PRINCESS a novel, I928 BLACK RECONSTRUCTION IN AMERICA, 1860-1880 I935 BLACK FOLK: THEN AND NOW I9)9 DUSK OF DAWN: AN AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF A RACE CONCEPT I94° COLOR AND DEMOCRACY: COLONIES AND PEACE I945 THE WORLD AND AFRICA An inquiry into the part which Africa has played in world history; by W. E. BURGHARDT DU BOIS PUBLISHED BY THE VIKING PRESS New York . 1947 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ TO NINA FOR OUR GOLDEN WEDDING l )904,6 / C I { COPYRIGHT 1946, 1947 BY W. E. B. DU BOIS PUBLISHED BY THE VIKING PRESS IN JANUARY 1947 PUBLISHED ON THE SAME DAY IN THE DOMINION OF CANADA BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED PRINTED IN U.S.A. BY VAIL·BALLOU PRESS, INC. CONTENTS FOREWORD vii I. THE COLLAPSE OF EUROPE 1 II. THE WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD 16 III. THE RAPE OF AFRICA 44 IV. THE PEOPLING OF AFRICA 81 V. EGYPT 98 VI. THE LAND OF THE BURNT FACES 115 VII. ATLANTIS 148 VIII. CENTRAL AFRICA AND THE MARCH OF THE BANTU 164 IX. ASIA IN AFRICA 176 X. THE BLACK SUDAN 201 XI. ANDROMEDA 226 THE MESSAGE 261 INDEX 263 v FOREWORD SIN CE the rise of the sugar empire and the resultant cottonkingdom, there has been consistent effort to rationalize Negro slavery by omitting Africa from world history, so that today it is almost universally assumed that history can be truly written without reference to Negroid peoples. I believe this to be scientifically unsound and also dangerous for logical social conclusions. Therefore I am seeking in this book to remind readers in this crisis of civilization, of how critical a part Africa has played in human history, past and present, and how im- possible it is to forget this and rightly explain the present plight of mankind. Twice before I have essayed to write on the history of Africa: once in 1915 when the editors of the Home University Library asked me to attempt such a work. The result was the little volume called The Negro, which gave evidence of a certain naive astonishment on my own part at the wealth of fact and material concerning the Negro peoples, the very existence of which I had myself known little despite a varied university career. The result was a condensed and not altogether logical narrative. Nevertheless, it has been widely read and is still in print. Naturally I wished to enlarge upon this earlier work after World War I and at the beginning of what I thought was a new era. So I wrote Black Folk: Then and Now, with SOmenew rna- vii Vlll FOREWORD terial and a more logical arrangement. But it happened that I was writing at the end of an age which marked the final catastro- phe of the old era of European world dominance rather than at the threshold of a change of which I had not dreamed in 1935. I deemed it, therefore, not only fitting but necessary in 1946 to essay again not so much a history of the Negroid peoples as a statement of their integral role in human history from pre- historic to modern times. I still labor under the difficulty of the persistent lack of in- terest in Africa so long characteristic of modern history and sociology. The careful, detailed researches into the history of Negroid peoples have only begun, and the need for them is not yet clear to the thinking world. I feel compelled nevertheless to go ahead with my interpretation, even though that interpreta- tion has here and there but slender historical proof. I believe that in the main my story is true, despite the fact that so often between the American Civil War and World War I the weight of history and science supports me only in part and in some cases appears violently to contradict me. At any rate, here is a history of the world written from the African point of view; or better, a history of the Negro as part of the world which now lies about us in ruins. I am indebted to my assistant, Dr. Irene Diggs, for efficient help in arranging the material and reading the manuscript. I feel now as though I were approaching a crowd of friends and enemies, who ask a bit breathlessly, whose and whence is the testimony on which I rely for something that even resembles Authority? To which I return two answers: I am challenging Authority--even Maspero, Sayee, Reisner, Breasted, and hun- dreds of other men of highest respectability, who did not attack but studiously ignored the Negro on the Nile and in the world and talked as though black folk were nonexistent and unim- portant. They are part of the herd of writers of modern history who never heard of Africa or declare with Guernier "Seule de taus les continents l'Afrique n'a pas d'histoire!" FOREWORD ix For chapters one and two I have relied upon my own travel and observation over a fairly long life. For confirmation I have resurrected William Howitt's Colonization and Christianity, a V popular history of how Europeans treated the natives in their colonies. The book was published in London in 1838, and since then imperial Europe had tried to forget it. I have also made bold to repeat the testimony of Karl Marx, whom I regard as the greatest of modern philosophers, and I have not been deterred by the witch-hunting which always follows mention of his name. I like Robert Briffault's The Decline and Fall of the British Empire (1938) and George Padmore's How Britain Rules Africa (1936). I have mentioned the work of Anna Graves, who is usually ignored because she does not follow the conventions of historical writing and because no publisher has thought that he could make money out of her work. In chapter three, on the slave trade, I have especially relied on Eric Williams' new and excellent work, Capitalism and Slavery; also on Wilson Williams' work published in the first number of the Howard University Studies in the Social Sciences. My own Suppression of the Slave Trade has continued to be of service. Rayford Logan's work on the United States and Haiti and Chapman Cohen's Christianity, Slavery, and Labor (1931) have also been used. Reginald Coupland's East Africa and Its Invaders (1938) has been valuable. But my greatest help in this chapter after Eric Williams, has been E. D. Moore's Ivory: The Scourge of Africa (1931); it is an invaluable book and I am deeply indebted to its author for facts. In chapter four I have relied on Edwin W. Smith, now Editor of Africa and Julian Huxley; also on C. G. Seligmann, whose Races of Africa (1930), is priceless and marred only by his obses- sion with the "Hamites." In chapter five on Egypt there is naturally the greatest diver- sity of opinion. My attention to the subject was first aroused by the little pamphlet published by Alexander F. Chamberlain in 1911, "The Contribution of the Negro to Human Civilization." x FOREWORD Naturally one must read Maspero, Breasted, Rawlinson, and the other earlier and indefatigable students; but I have mainly de- pended upon W. M. Flinders Petrie's History of Egypt and on the sixth volume of the work on Egypt in the Middle Ages by E. Stanley Lane-Poole edited by Petrie. The travels of Ibn Batura and Duarte Barbosa form a firm background to the modern research of Arthur Thomson, David Randall-Maclver, and Grace Caton-Thompsen. Especially Egyptian Civilization by Alexandre Moret, published in French in 1927 and shortly thereafter in English has been illuminating. I have looked through. the splendid reproductions of Karl R. Lepsius' Denkmdler, I have read Eduard Meyer's Geschichte des Alter- turns (1910-13); but of greatest help to me has been Leo Hans- berry. Mr. Hansberry, a professor at Howard University, is the one modern scholar who has tried to study the Negro in Egypt and Ethiopia. I regret that he has not published more of his work. The overwhelming weight of conventional scientific opinion on Africa has overawed him, but his work in manu- script is outstanding. Arthur E. P. B. Weigall's Short History of Egypt has also been of use. In chapter six I have depended upon Hansberry. One always turns back to Winwood Reade's Martyrdom of Man for renewal of faith. The works of Sir Ernest Budge, George A. Reisner, A. H. Sayee, and F. L. Griffith have naturally been of use when they were not indulging their opinions about Negroes. I should like to have used the researches on the Negro in classic Europe of Dr. Frank Snowden of Howard University . But classical journals in America have hitherto declined to publish his paper because it favored the Negro too much, leav- ing the public still to rely on Beardsley's stupid combination of scholarship and race prejudice which Johns Hopkins University published. I tried to get Dr. Snowden to let me see his manu- script, but he refused. In chapter seven I have relied upon Leo Frobenius. Frobenius is not popular among conventional historians or anthropol- FOREWORD Xl ogists. He indulged his imagination. He had strong beliefs; but he was a great man and a great thinker. He looked upon Africa with unprejudiced eyes and has been more valuable for his in- terpretation of the Negro than any other man I know. The many works of Robert S. Rattray and Meek, Westermann and Schapera, cannot be ignored. African students like Soga and Caseley-Hayford have helped me, and younger men like Orizu. Mbadiwe, and Ojiki. Basic is the fine unprejudiced work of Maurice Delafosse. I have used Flora Lugard, although she is not a scientist; and also a new young Negro writer, Armattoe. In the eighth chapter I have naturally depended upon Sir Harry H. Johnston and his study of the Bantu languages; the J splendid work of Miss Caton-Thompsen. I have learned much from James A. Rogers. Rogers is an untrained American Negro writer who has done his work under great difficulty without funds and at much personal sacrifice. But no man living has revealed so many important facts about the Negro race as has Rogers. His mistakes are many and his background narrow, but he is a true historical student. In chapter nine there is reliance on Lane-Poole and Cooper, whom I have mentioned before, and on the new points of view brought by j awaharlal Nehru in his Autobiography (1940) and his Glimpses of World History (1942). The study of Egypt and the East by Alfred T. Butler and Palon have shed much needed light; and general anthropology is gradually revealing the trend of the Negro in Africa as we emerge from the blight of the writers of current history. Chapter ten is built on the work of Maurice Delafosse and of William D. Cooley (1841), with help from H. R. Palmer, Flora Lugard, and many others. Chapter eleven depends on current thought and documents; and books like Leonard Barnes' Soviet Light on the Colonies (1944) and Harold Laski's Rise of Liberalism (1936). In fine, I have done in this book the sort of thing at which every scholar shudders. With meager preparation and all too xu FOREWORD general background of learning, I have essayed a task, which, to be adequate and complete, should be based upon the research of a lifetime! But Iam faced with the dilemma, that either I do this now or leave it for others who have not had the tragedy of life which I have, forcing me to face a task for which they may have small stomach and little encouragement from the world round , about. If,out of my almost inevitable mistakes and inaccuracies 1 and false conclusions, I shall have at least clearly stated my main I issue-that black Africans are men in the same sense as white 1 European and yellow Asiatics, and that history can easily prove this-then I shall rest satisfied even under the stigma of an in- complete and, to many, inconclusive work. w. E. B. DuBois New York May 1946 CHAPTER I THE COLLAPSE OF EUROPE This is a consideration of the nature of the calam- ity which has overtaken human civilization. WE ARE face to face with the greatest tragedy that has everovertaken the world. The collapse of Europe is to us the more astounding because of the boundless faith which we have had in European civilization. We have long believed without argument or reflection that the cultural status of the people of Europe and of North America represented not only the best civilization which the world had ever known, but also a goal of human effort destined to go on from triumph to triumph until the perfect accomplishment was reached. Our present nervous breakdown, nameless fear, and often despair, comes from the sudden facing of this faith with calamity. In such a case, what we need above all is calm appraisal of the situation, the application of cold common sense. What in reality is the nature of the catastrophe? To what pattern of human culture does it apply? And, finally, why did it happen? In this search for reasons we must seek not simply current facts or facts within the memory of living men, but we must also, and es- pecially in this case, seek lessons from history. It is perhaps the greatest indictment that can be brought against history as a science and against its teachers that we are usually indisposed 2 THE WORLD AND AFRICA to refer to history for the settlement of pressing problems. We realize that history is too often what we want it to be and what we are determined men shall believe rather than a grim record of what has taken place in the past. Manifestly the present plight of the world is a direct out- growth of the past, and I have made bold to add to the many books on the subject of our present problems because I believe that certain suppressions in the historical record current in our day will lead to a tragic failure in assessing causes. More par- ticularly, I believe that the habit, long fostered, of forgetting and detracting from the thought and acts of the people of Africa, is not only a direct cause of our present plight, but will continue to cause trouble until we face the facts. I shall try not to exagger- ate this thread of African history in the world development, but I shall insist equally that it be not ignored. At the beginning of the twentieth century, when I was but ten years out of college, I visited the Paris Exposition of 1900. It was one of the finest, perhaps the very finest, of world expositions, and it typified what the European world wanted to think of itself and its future. Wealth and Science were the outstanding matters of emphasis: there was the new and splendid Pont Alexandre crossing the Seine, named for the Czar of Russia; there was an amazing exhibit of Russian industry at Jaroslav; and I had brought with me, as excuse for coming, a little display showing the development of Negroes in the United States, which gained a gold medal. All about me was an extraordinary display of wealth, luxury, and industrial technique, striking evidence of a Europe triumphant over the world and the center of science and art, power and human freedom. Itwas easy to see what the great countries of Europe thought of themselves: France stood pre-eminently for art, for taste in building, technique, and pure expression; Germany stood for science and government; England for wealth and power with a high level of comfort; and America for freedom of human in- itiative. THE COLLAPSE OF EUROPE 3 There was even in this French exposition a certain dominance of the British Empire idea. The British paper promise-to-pay was actually worth more to the traveler than gold. British in- dustry was unrivaled in efficient technique. British investments were the safest; and Great Britain was the widest and most suc- cessful administrator of colonies. Every kind of tribute was paid to her; she was the acknowledged leader in such various things as men's cloth and clothing, public manners, the rate of public expenditure-and all this showed in the deference a British subject could demand everywhere throughout the world. Then came five crashing events in quick succession. First, in 1905, at Saint Petersburg, the shooting down in cold blood of Russian workingmen in the first organized attempt of the twentieth century to achieve relief; and by that murderous volley the Czar killed the faith of working Russia in the Little White Father. He revealed that Russian industry was paying 50 per cent and more in profits to Germans and other investors, while the workers starved. The Czar himself thus sowed the seeds of revolution. Second, in 1911 a German warship sailed into Agadir, North Africa, and demanded in the name of the Emperor that the Ger- man Reich be consulted concerning the future of Morocco. I remember how the incident startled London. I was there at the time, attending the First Races Congress. It is a meeting now forgotten, but it might have been of world significance. Its advice might have changed the course of history had not World War I followed so fast. Meeting at the University of London was prob- ably the largest representation of the groups of the world known as races and subraces; they were consulting together under the leadership of science and ethics for a future world which would be peaceful, without race prejudice; and which would be co- operative, especially in the social sciences. Among the speakers were world leaders-Giuseppe Sergi, Franz Boas, John A. Hob- son, Felix Adler, Sir Sidney Olivier, and Wu Ting-fang. A hymn to the peoples was read: 4 THE WORLD AND AFRICA So sit we all as one So, gloomed in tall and stone-swathed groves, The Buddha walks with Christl And AI-Koran and Bible both be holy! Almighty Word! In this Thine awful sanctuary, First and flame-haunted City of the Widened World, Assail us, Lord of Lands and Seas! We are but weak and wayward men, Distraught alike with hatred and vainglory; Prone to despise the Soul that breathes within- High-visioned hordes that lie and steal and kill, Sinning the sin each separate heart disclaims, Clambering upon our riven, writhing selves, Besieging Heaven by trampling men to Hell! We be blood-guilty! La, our hands be red! Let no man blame the other in this sin! But here-here in the white Silence of the Dawn, Before the Womb of Time, With bowed hearts all flame and shame, We face the birth-pangs of a world: We hear the stifled cry of Nations all but born- The wail of women ravished of their stunted brood! We see the nakedness of Toil, the poverty of Wealth, We know the Anarchy of Empire, and doleful Death of Life! And hearing, seeing, knowing all, we cry: Save us, World-Spirit, from our lesser selves! Grant us that war and hatred cease, Reveal our souls in every race and hue! Help us, 0 Human God, in this Thy Truce, To make Humanity divine! 1 1W. E. B. DuBois, Darkwater (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Howe, 1920), pp. 275-76. THE COLLAPSE OF EUROPE 5 There were a few startling incidents. I remember with what puzzled attention we heard Felix von Luschan, the great anthropologist of the University of Berlin, annihilate the thesis of race inferiority and then in the same breath end his paper with these words: "Nations will come and go, but racial and national antagonism will remain; and this is well, for mankind would become like a herd of sheep if we were to lose our national ambition and cease to look with pride and delight, not only on our industries and science, but also on our splendid soldiers and our glorious ironclads. Let small-minded people whine about the horrid cost of dreadnoughts; as long as every nation in Europe spends, year after year, much more money on wine, beer, and brandy than on her army and navy, there is no reason to dread our impoverishment by militarism. Si vis pacem, para bellum; and in reality there is no doubt that we shall be the better able to avoid war, the better we care for our armor. A nation is free only in so far as her own internal affairs are concerned. She has to re- spect the right of other nations as well as to defend her own, and her vital interests she will, if necessary, defend with blood and iron." 2 We were aghast. Did German science defend war? We were hardly reassured when in printing this speech the editor appended the following note: "To prevent the last few para- graphs from being misinterpreted, Professor von Luschan au- thorizes us to state that he regards the desire for a war between Germany and England as 'insane or dastardly.' " 3 But it was in vain. In 1914 came World War I; in 1929 came the depression; in 1939 came World War II. The cost of these wars and crises in property and human life is almost beyond belief; the cost in the destruction of youth and of faith in the world and mankind is incalculable. Why did these things happen? 2 Gustav Spiller, ed., Papers on Inter-Racial Problems, Universal Races Congress, I (London: P. S. King & Son, 1911), pp. 23-24. 3 Ibid., p. 24. 6 THE WORLD AND AFRICA 'We may begin with the fact that in 1888 there came to the throne of Germany a young, vigorous German emperor of British descent. Wilhelm II had utter faith in the future of Ger- many. As a student I used to see him often on the Unter den Linden. Time and again we students swung to the curb, and through the central arch of the Brandenburg Gate came the tossing of plumes and the prancing of horses, and splendid with shining armor and blare of trumpet there rode Wilhelm, by the Grace of God, King of Prussia and German Emperor. Back of Wilhelm's faith in Germany lay deep envy of the power of Britain. In his soul strove unceasingly the ambition of Bismarck of Prussia and the aristocratic imperialism of his mother, a daughter of Queen Victoria. The French-British Entente Cordiale of the new century was faced by a German demand for "a place in the sun," a right to extract from colonial and semicolonial areas a share of the wealth which was going to Britain. When Germany invaded Belgium, and with that invasion brought war with England, it must be remembered that by that same token Germany was invading the Bel- gian Congo and laying claim to the ownership of Central Africa. Wor ld War I then was a war over spheres of influence in Asia and colonies in Africa, and in that war, curiously enough, both Asia and Africa were called upon to support Europe. Senegalese troops, for example, saved France and Europe from the first armed German onslaught. They were the shock troops brought to be slaughtered in thousands by the climate and cannon of Europe. The man who brought the African troops to the succor of France was Blaise Diagne. He was a tall, thin Negro, nervous with energy, more patriotic in his devotion to France than many of the French. He was deputy from Senegal in the French Parliament and had been selected as the man to whom the chiefs of French West Africa would render implicit obedience. Raised to cabinet rank, he was made the official representative of the French in West Africa. The white governor who found himself THE COLLAPSE OF EUROPE 7 subordinated to this Negro resigned in disgust, but Diagne went down the West Coast in triumph and sent a hundred thousand black soldiers to France at this critical time. One must not forget that incident on the fields of Flanders which has been so quickly forgotten. Against the banked artillery of the magnificent German Army were sent untrained and poorly armed Senegalese. They marched at command in unwav- ering ranks, raising the war cry in a dozen different Sudanese tongues. When the artillery belched they shivered, but never faltered. They marched straight into death; the war cries be- came fainter and fainter and dropped into silence as not a single black man was left living on that field. I was in Paris just after the armistice in 1918, and it was to Diagne that I went to ask for the privilege of calling a Pan- African Congress in Paris during the Versailles Peace Con- ference. The idea of one Africa to unite the thought and ideals of all native peoples of the dark continent belongs to the twentieth century and stems naturally from the West Indies and the United States. Here various groups of Africans, quite separate in origin, became so united in experience and so exposed to the impact of new cultures that they began to think of Africa as one idea and one land. Thus late in the eighteenth century when a separate Negro Church was formed in Philadelphia it called itself "African"; and there were various "African" societies in many parts of the United States. It was not, however, until 1900 that a black West Indian barrister, practicing in London, called together a Pan-African Conference. This meeting attracted attention, put the word "Pan-African" in the dictionaries for the first time, and had some thirty delegates, mainly from England and the West Indies, with a few colored North Americans. The conference was welcomed by the Lord Bishop of London and a promise was obtained from Queen Victoria, through Joseph Chamberlain, not to "overlook the interests and welfare of the native races." 8 THE WORLD AND AFRICA This meeting had no deep roots in Africa itself, and the movement and the idea died for a generation. Then came World War I, and among North American Negroes at its close there was determined agitation for the rights of Negroes throughout the world, and particularly in Africa. Meetings were held and a petition was sent to President Wilson. By indirection I secured passage on the Creel press boat, the Orizaba, and landed in France in December 1918. I went with the idea of calling a Pan- African Congress, and to try to impress upon the members of the Peace Conference sitting at Versailles the importance of Africa in the future world. I was without credentials or influence. I tried to get a conference with President Wilson but got only as far as Colonel House, who was sympathetic but noncommittal. The Chicago Tribune of January 19, 1919, in a dispatch from Paris dated December 30, 1918, said: An Ethiopian Utopia, to be fashioned out of the German colonies, is the latest dream of leaders of the Negro race who are here at the invitation of the United States government as part of the extensive entourage of the American peace delegation. Robert R. Moton, successorof the late Booker Washington as head of Tuskegee Insti- tute, and Dr. William E. B. DuBois, editor of the Crisis, are pro- moting a Pan-African Conference to be held here during the winter while the Peace Conference is in full blast. It is to embrace Negro leaders from America, Abyssinia, Liberia, Haiti, the French and British colonies, and other parts of the black world. Its object is to get out of the Peace Conference an effort to modernize the dark continent and in the world reconstruction to provide international machinery looking toward the civilization of the African natives. The Negro leaders are not agreed upon any definite plan, but Dr. DuBois has mapped out a scheme which he has presented in the form of a memorandum to President Wilson. It is quite Utopian, and it has less than a Chinaman's chance of getting anywhere in the Peace Conference, but it is nevertheless interesting. As "self- determination" is one of the words to conjure with in Paris nowa- days, the Negro leaders are seeking to have it applied, if possible, in a measure to their race in Africa. THE COLLAPSE OF EUROPE 9 Dr. DuBois sets forth that while the principle of self-determination cannot be applied to uncivilized peoples, yet the educated blacks should have some voice in the disposition of the German colonies. He maintains that in settling what is to be done with the German colonies the Peace Conference might consider the wishes of the intelligent Negroes in the colonies themselves, the Negroes of the United States, and South Africa, and the West Indies, the Negro governments of Abyssinia, Liberia, and Haiti, the educated Negroes in French West Africa and Equatorial Africa and in British Uganda, Nigeria, Basutoland, Swaziland, Sierra Leone, Gold Goast, Gambia, and Bechuanaland, and in the Union of South Africa. Dr. DuBois' dream is that the Peace Conference could form an inter- nationalized Africa, to have as its basis the former German colonies, with their 1,000,000 square miles and 12,500,000 population. "To this," his plan reads, "could be added by negotiation the 800,000 square miles and 9,000,000 inhabitants of Portuguese Africa. It is not impossible that Belgium could be persuaded to add to such a state the 900,000 square miles and 9,000,000 natives of the Congo, making an international Africa with over 2,500,000 square miles of land and over 20,000,000 people. "This Africa for the Africans could be under the guidance of inter- national organization. The governing international commission should represent not simply governments, but modern culture, science, commerce, social reform, and religious philanthropy. It must represent not simply the white world, but the civilized Negro world. "We can, if we will, inaugurate on the dark continent a last great crusade for humanity. With Africa redeemed, Asia would be safe and Europe indeed triumphant." Members of the American delegation and associated experts assured me that no congress on this matter could be held in Paris because France was still under martial law; but the ace that I had up my sleeve was Blaise Diagne, the black deputy from Senegal and Commissaire-Ceneral in charge of recruiting native African troops. I went to Diagne and sold him the idea of a Pan-African Congress. He consulted Clemenceau, and the matter was held up two wet, discouraging months. Finally we received permission 10 THE WORLD AND AFRICA to hold the Congress in Paris. "Don't advertise it," said Cle- menceau, "but go ahead." Walter Lippmann wrote me in his crabbed hand, February 20, 1919: "I am very much interested in your organization of the Pan-African conference, and glad that Clemenceau has made it possible. Will you send me what- ever reports you may have on the work?" American newspaper correspondents wrote home: "Officials here are puzzled by the news from Paris that plans are going forward there for a Pan-African conference. Acting Secretary Polk said today the State Department had been officially advised by the French government that no such conference would be held. It was announced recently that no passports would be issued for American delegates desiring to attend the meeting."> But at the very time that Polk was assuring American Negroes that no Congress would be held, the Congress actually assembled in Paris. This Congress represented Africa partially. Of the fifty-seven delegates from fifteen countries, nine were African countries with twelve delegates. Of the remaining delegates, sixteen were from the United States, and twenty-one from the West Indies. Most of these delegates did not come to France for this meeting but happened to be residing there, mainly for reasons connected with the war. America and the colonial powers had refused to issue special visas. The Congress influenced the Peace Conference. The New YOTk Evening Globe of February 22, 1919, described it as "the first assembly of the kind in history, and has for its object the drafting of an appeal to the Peace Conference to give the Negro race of Africa a chance to develop unhindered by other races. Seated at long green tables in the council room today, were Negroes in the trim uniform of American Army officers, other American colored men in frock coats or business suits, polished French Negroes who hold public office, Senegalese who sit in the French Chamber of Deputies .... " 4 Pittsburgh [Pa.] Dispatch, February 16, 1919. THE COLLAPSE OF EUROPE 11 The Congress specifically asked that the German colonies be turned over to an international organization instead of being handled by the various colonial powers. Out of this idea came the Mandates Commission. The resolutions of the Congress asked in part: A. That the Allied and Associated Powers establish a code of law for the international protection of the natives· of Africa, similar to the proposed international code for labor. B. That the League of Nations establish a permanent Bureau charged with the special duty of overseeing the application of these laws to the political, social, and economic welfare of the natives. C. The Negroes of the world demand that hereafter the natives of Africa and the peoples of African descent be governed according to the following principles: 1. The land: the land and its natural resources shall be held in trust for the natives and at all times they shall have effective ownership of as much land as they can profitably develop. 2. Capital: the investment of capital and granting of concessions shall be so regulated as to prevent the exploitation of the na- tives and the exhaustion of the natural wealth of the country, Concessions shall always be limited in time and subject to State control. The growing social needs of the natives must be re- garded and the profits taxed for social and material benefit of the natives. 3· Labor: slavery and corporal punishment shall be abolished and forced labor except in punishment for crime; and the general conditions of labor shall be prescribed and regulated by the State. 4. Education: it shall be the right of every native child to learn to read and write his own language, and the language of the trustee nation, at public expense, and to be given technical in- struction in some branch of industry. The State shall also edu- cate as large a number of natives as possible in higher tech- nical and cultural training and maintain a corps of native teachers. 5. The State: the natives of Africa must have the right to partici- 12 THE WORLD AND AFRICA pate in the government as fast as their development permits, in conformity with the principle that the government exists for the natives, and not the natives for the government. They shall at once be allowed to participate in local and tribal gov- ernment, according to ancient usage, and this participation shall gradually extend, as education and experience proceed, to the higher officesof State; to the end that, in time, Africa be ruled by consent of the Africans.... Whenever it is proven that African natives are not receiving just treatment at the hands of any State or that any State deliberately ex- cludes its civilized citizens or subjects of Negro descent from its body politic and cultural, it shall be the duty of the League of Nations to bring the matter to the notice of the civilized World.5 The New York Herald of February 24, 1919, said: "There is nothing unreasonable in the program drafted at the Pan-African Congress which was held in Paris last week. It calls upon the Allied and Associated Powers to draw up an international code of law for the protection of the nations of Africa, and to create, as a section of the League of Nations, a permanent bureau to insure observance of such laws and thus further the racial, political, and economic interests of the natives." We were, of course, but weak and ineffective amateurs chip- ping at a hard conglomeration of problems about to explode in chaos. At least we were groping for light. Not only Africa but Asia took active part in World War I on the side of the Allies. India saw for the first time a prospect of autonomy within the British Empire. Japan wanted to be recognized as the equal of white European nations, and the Chinese Republic started on its new path to modern civilization. Peace dawned, and the war came to be known as "the War to End War." But in vain, for this war had not ended the idea of European world domination. Rather it had loosened the seams of imperialism. 5 Broadsidepublished by the Pan-AfricanCongress,Paris, 1919. THE COLLAPSE OF EUROPE In Africa, Negro troops had conquered German colonies, and now British West Africa demanded a share in government. In the very midst of war came labor revolt in Russia, which Europe and North America tried to repress, but they did not succeed. There came from the colonies in Africa and Asia insistent demand for freedom and democracy. It was in 1915 that the Congress of West Africa appealed to Great Britain in these words: In the demand for the franchise by the people of British West Africa, it is not to be supposed that they are asking to be allowed to copy a foreign institution. On the contrary, it is important to notice that the principle of electing representatives to local councils and bodies is inherent in all the systemsof British West Africa." In the interval between World War I and World War II, India's determined opposition to British rule increased under the leadership of Gandhi, who sought to substitute peaceful non- co-operation for war. The answer was the massacre of Amritsar. In America organized industry rose in its might to realize fantastic profits through domination of world industry. It fought labor unions and tried to nullify democracy by the power of wealth and capital. In the very midst of this, the magnificent structure of capitalistic industry collapsed in every part of the world. Make no mistake, war did not cause the Great Depression; it was the reasons behind the depression that caused war and will cause it again. The world tried to meet depression and unemployment and to compose differences between capital and labor. Faced by the threat of Russian Communism, Italy, which with Spain was the most poverty-stricken country in Western Europe, seized control of the nation and of industry with the object of ruling it through an oligarchy, eliminating all democratic control. This was the answer of capitalists to the growing and threatening political G Memorandum of the case of the National Congress of British West Africa ... , March 1920, p. 2. THE WORLD AND AFRICA power of the workers. Hitler followed, opposing the Socialist state of Weimar, with its unemployment and political chaos, with a new state and a new nationalism. The industrial leaders surrendered their power into his hands; the army followed suit; unemployment disappeared, and Hitler diverted the nation with visions of vengeance to be achieved through a new state ruled by German supermen. Simultaneously, Japan, having been rebuffed by England and America in her plea for racial equality before the League of Nations, saw an. opportunity in this new order to displace Europe in the control of Asia. Then came rumblings of World War II. The Axis wooed first England and France and then Russia. Britain made every offer of appeasement. Ethiopia was thrown to the dogs of a new Italian imperialism in Africa. Everything was offered to Hitler but the balance of power in Europe and the surrender of colonies. America, hesitating, was ready to fight for private industry against Nazism and to defend Anglo-American in- vestment in colonies and quasi-colonial areas. Hitler would not be appeased. So war began. Hell broke loose. Six million Jews were murdered in Germany through a propa- ganda which tied the small shopkeepers back of Hitler and placed unreasoning race prejudice back of war. France feared to trust colonial Africa. De Gaulle and the black Governor Eboue, with co-operation from England and France, could have established a new black France in Africa and shortened the war; but France yielded to Germany. England resisted doggedly. Russia yielded and joined hands with Germany, but not for long. The real battle then began; the battle of the Nazi-Fascist oligarchy against the dictatorship of the proletariat. Germany determined first to crush Russia and then with Russian resources to destroy the British Empire. Japan aroused Asia, and by attacking America thus furnished the one reason, based on race prejudice, which brought America immediately into the war. India protested, China starved and struggled, the horrible world war with uncounted cost in property, life, and youth came to THE COLLAPSE OF EUROPE an end, and with it came the discovery of the use of atomic energy. It was significant that the man who invented the phrase "White Man's Burden" and who was its most persistent propa- gandist, also wrote its epitaph: If, drunk with sight of power, we loose Wild tongues that have not Thee in awe, Such boastings as the Gentiles use, Or lesser breeds without the Law- For heathen heart that puts her trust In reeking tube and iron shard, All valiant dust that builds on dust, And, guarding, calls not Thee to guard, For frantic boast and foolish word- Thy Mercy on Thy People, Lord! 7 7 Rudyard Kipling, "Recessional." CHAPTER II THE WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD This is an attempt to show briefly what the domi- nation of Europe over the world has meant to mankind and especially to Africans in the nine- teenth and twentieth centuries. WHAT are the real causes back of the collapse of Europe inthe twentieth century? What was the real European im- perialism pictured in the Paris Exposition of 1900? France did not stand purely for art. There was much imitation, con- vention, suppression, and sale of genius; and France wanted wealth and power at any price. Germany did not stand solely for science. I remember when the German professor at whose home I was staying in 1890 expressed his contempt for the rising businessmen. He had heard them conversing as he drank in a Bierstube at Eisenach beneath the shade of Luther's Wartburg. Their conversation, he sneered, was Lauter Geschiijtl He did not realize that a new Germany was rising which wanted German science for one main purpose-wealth and power. America wanted freedom, but freedom to get rich by any method short of anarchy; and freedom to get rid of the democracy which allowed laborers to dictate to managers and investors. All these centers of civilization envied England the wealth and power built upon her imperial colonial system. One looking at European imperialism in 1900 therefore should have looked 16 WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD first at the depressed peoples. One would have found them also among the laboring classes in Europe and America, living in slums behind a facade of democracy, nourished on a false edu- • cation which lauded the triumphs of the industrial undertaker, made the millionaire the hero of modern life, and taught youth that success was wealth. The slums of England emphasized class differences; slum dwellers and British aristocracy spoke different tongues, had different manners and ideals. The goal of human life was illustrated in the nineteenth-century English novel: the aristocrat of independent income surrounded by a herd of obsequious and carefully trained servants. Even today the British butler is a personage in the literary world. Out of this emerged the doctrine of the Superior Race: the theory that a minority of the people of Europe are by birth and natural gift the rulers of mankind; rulers of their own sup- pressed labor classes and, without doubt, heaven-sent rulers of yellow, brown, and black people. This way of thinking gave rise to many paradoxes, and it was characteristic of the era that men did not face paradoxes with any plan to solve them. There was the religious paradox: the contradiction between the Golden Rule and the use of force to keep human beings in their appointed places; the doctrine of the ''''hite Man's Burden and the conversion of the heathen, faced by the actuality of famine, pestilence, and caste. There was the assumption of the absolute necessity of poverty for the majority of men in order to save civilization for the minority, for that aristocracy of mankind which was at the same time the chief beneficiary of culture. There was the frustration of democracy: lip service was paid to the idea of the rule of the people; but at the same time the mass of people were kept so poor, and through their poverty so diseased and ignorant, that they could not carryon successfully a modern state or modern industry. There was the paradox of peace: I remember before World War I stopping in at the Hotel Astor to hear Andrew Carnegie talk to his peace society. War 18 THE WORLD AND AFRICA had begun between Italy and Turkey but, said Mr. Carnegie blandly, we are not talking about peace among unimportant people; we are talking about peace among the great states of the world. I walked out. Here I knew lay tragedy, and the events proved it; for the great states went to war in jealousy over the ownership of the little people. The paradox of the peace movement of the nineteenth century is a baffling comment on European civilization. There was not a single year during the nineteenth century when the world was not at war. Chiefly, but not entirely, these wars were waged to subjugate colonial peoples. They were carried on by Europeans, and at least one hundred and fifty separate wars can be counted during the heyday of the peace movement. What the peace movement really meant was peace in Europe and between Eu- ropeans, while for the conquest of the world and because of the suspicion which they held toward each other, every nation main- tained a standing army which steadily grew in cost and menace. One of the chief causes which thus distorted the development of Europe was the African slave trade, and we have tried to re- write its history and meaning and to make it occupy a much less important place in the world's history than it deserves. The result of the African slave trade and slavery on the European mind and culture was to degrade the position of labor and the respect for humanity as such. Not, God knows, that the ancient world honored labor. With exceptions here and there, it despised, enslaved, and crucified human toil. But there were counter currents, and with the Renaissance in Europe-that new light with which Asia and Africa illumined the Dark Ages of Europe-came new hope for mankind. A new religion of per- sonal sacrifice had been building on five hundred years of the self-effacement of Buddha before the birth of Christ, and the equalitarianism of Mohammed which followed six hundred years after Christ's birth. A new world, seeking birth in Europe, was also being discovered beyond the sunset. With this new world came fatally the African slave trade and WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD 19 Negro slavery in the Americas. There were new cruelties, new hatreds of human beings, and new degradations of human labor. The temptation to degrade human labor was made vaster and deeper by the incredible accumulation of wealth based on slave labor, by the boundless growth of greed, and by world-wide organization for new agricultural crops, new techniques in industry, and world-wide trade. Just as Europe lurched forward to a new realization of beauty, a new freedom of thought and religious belief, a new demand by laborers to choose their work and enjoy its fruit, uncurbed greed rose to seize and monopolize the uncounted treasure of the fruit of labor. Labor was degraded, humanity was despised, the theory of "race" arose. There came a new doctrine of uni- versallabor: mankind were of two sorts-the superior and the inferior; the inferior toiled for the superior; and the superior were the real men, the inferior half men or less. Among the white lords of creation there were- "lower classes" resembling the in- ferior darker folk. Where possible they were to be raised to equality with the master class. But no equality was possible or desirable for "darkies." In line with this conviction, the Chris- tian Church, Catholic and Protestant, at first damned the hea- then blacks with the "curse of Canaan," then held out hope of freedom through "conversion," and finally acquiesced in a permanent status of human slavery. Despite the fact that the nineteenth century saw an upsurge in the power of laboring classes and a fight toward economic equal- ity and political democracy, this movement and battle was made fiercer and less successful and lagged far behind the accumu- lation of wealth, because in popular opinion labor was funda- mentally degrading and the just burden of inferior peoples. Luxury and plenty for the few and poverty for the many was looked upon as inevitable in the course of nature. In addition to this, it went without saying that the white people of Europe had a right to live upon the labor and property of the colored peoples of the world. 20 THE WORLD AND AFRICA In order to establish the righteousness of this point of view, science and religion, government and industry, were wheeled into line. The word "Negro" was used for the first time in the world's history to tie color to race and blackness to slavery and degradation. The white race was pictured as "pure" and su- perior; the black race as dirty, stupid, and inevitably inferior; the yellow race as sharing, in deception and cowardice, much of this color inferiority; while mixture of races was considered the prime cause of degradation and failure in civilization. Every- thing great, everything fine, everything really successful in human culture, was white. In order to prove this, even black people in India and Africa were labeled as "white" if they showed any trace of progress; and, on the other hand, any progress by colored people was attributed to some intermixture, ancient or modern, of white blood or some influence of white civilization. This logical contradiction influenced and misled science. The same person declared that mulattoes were inferior and warned against miscegenation, and yet attributed the pre-eminence of a Dumas, a Frederick Douglass, a Booker Washington, to their white blood. A system at first conscious and then unconscious of lying about history and distorting it to the disadvantage of the Negroids became so widespread that the history of Africa ceased to be taught, the color of Memnon was forgotten, and every effort was made in archaeology, history, and biography, in biology, psy- chology, and sociology, to prove the all but universal assump- tion that the color line had a scientific basis. Without the winking of an eye, printing, gunpowder, the smelting of iron, the beginnings of social organization, not to mention political life and democracy, were attributed exclu- sively to the white race and to Nordic Europe. Religion sighed with relief when it could base its denial of the ethics of Christ and the brotherhood of men upon the science of Darwin, Go- bineau, and Reisner. WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD 21 It was bad enough in all conscience to have the consequences of this thought, these scientific conclusions and ethical sanctions, fall upon colored people the world over; but in the end it was even worse when one considers what this attitude did to the European worker. His aim and ideal was distorted. He did not wish to become efficient but rich. He began to want not comfort for all men, but power over other men for himself. He did not love humanity and he hated "niggers." When our High Com- missioner after the Spanish War appealed to America on behalf of "our little brown brother," the white workers replied, "He may be a brother of William H. Taft, But he ain't no brother of mine." Following the early Christian communism and sense of human brotherhood which began to grow in the Dark Ages and to blossom in the Renaissance there came to white workers in England, France, and Germany the iron law of wages, the pop- ulation doctrines of Malthus, and the bitter fight against the early trade unions. The first efforts at education, and par- ticularly the trend toward political democracy, aroused an antagonism of which the French Revolution did not dream. It was this bitter fight that exacerbated the class struggle and resulted in the first furious expression of Communism and the attempt at revolution. The unity of apprentice and master, the Christian sympathy between rich and poor, the communism of medieval charity, all were thrust into the new strait jacket of thought: poverty was the result of sloth and crime; wealth was the reward of virtue and work. The degraded yellow and black peoples were in the places which the world of necessity assigned to the inferior; and toward these lower ranks the working classes of all countries tended to sink save as they were raised and sup- ported by the rich, the investors, the captains of industry. In some parts of the world, notably in the Southern states of America, the argument went further than this: frank slavery of 22 THE WORLD AND AFRICA black folk was a better economic system than factory exploi- tation of whites. It was the natural arrangement of industry. It ought to be extended, certainly where colored people were in the majority. For half a century before 1861 the bolder minds of the South dreamed of a slave empire embracing the American tropics and extending eventually around the world. While their thought did not go to a final appraisement of white laboring classes, they certainly had in mind that these classes must rise or fall; must be forced into the class of employers with political power, or, like the poor whites of the South, be pushed down be- side or even below the working slaves. This philosophy had sympathizers in Europe. Without doubt, a large majority of influential public opinion in England, and possibly in both France and Germany, favored the South at the outbreak of the Civil War and sternly set its face against allow- ing any maudlin sympathy with "darkies," half monkeys and half men, in the stern fight for the extension of European dom- ination of the world. Widespread insensibility to cruelty and suffering spread in the white world, and to guard against too much emotional sympathy with the distressed, every effort was made to keep women and children and the more sensitive men deceived as to what was going on, not only in the slums of white countries, but also all over Asia, Africa, and the islands of the sea. Elaborate writing, disguised as interpretation, and the testimony of so-called "experts," made it impossible for charm- ing people in Europe to realize what their comforts and luxuries cost in sweat, blood, death, and despair, not only in the remoter parts of the world, but even on their own doorsteps. A gracious culture was built up; a delicately poised literature treated the little intellectual problems of the rich and well-born, discussed small matters of manners and convention, and omitted the weightier ones of law, mercy, justice, and truth. Even the evidence of the eyes and senses was denied by the mere weight of reiteration. The race that produced the ugly features of a Darwin or a Winston Churchill was always "beautiful," while WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD a Toussaint and a Menelik were ugly because they were black. The concept of the European "gentleman" was evolved: a! man well bred and of meticulous grooming, of knightly sports- manship and invincible courage even in the face of death; but one who did not hesitate to use machine guns against assagais and to cheat "niggers"; an ideal of sportsmanship which re- flected the Golden Rule and yet contradicted it-not only in business and in industry within white countries, but all over Asia and Africa-by indulging in lying, murder, theft, rape, deception, and degradation, of the same sort and kind which has left the world aghast at the accounts of what the Nazis did in Poland and Russia. There was no Nazi atrocity-concentration camps, wholesale maiming and murder, defilement of women or ghastly blas- phemy of childhood-which the Christian civilization of Europe had not long been practicing against colored folk in all parts of the world in the name of and for the defense of a Superior Race born to rule the world. Together with the idea of a Superior Race there grew up in Europe and America an astonishing ideal of wealth and luxury: the man of "independent" income who did not have to "work for a living," who could indulge his whims and fantasies, who was free from all compulsion either of ethics or hunger, became the hero of 'novels, of drama and of fairy tale. This wealth was built, in Africa especially, upon diamonds and gold, copper and tin, ivory and mahogany, palm oil and cocoa, seeds extracted and grown, beaten out of the blood-stained bodies of the natives, transported to Europe, processed by wage slaves who were not receiving, and as Ricardo assured them they could never receive, enough to become educated and healthy human beings, and then distributed among prostitutes and gamblers as well as among well-bred followers of art, literature, and drama. Cities were built, ugly and horrible, with regions for the cul- ture of crime, disease, and suffering, but characterized in pop- ular myth and blindness by wide and beautiful avenues where 24 THE WORLD AND AFRICA the rich and fortunate lived, laughed, and drank tea. National heroes were created by lopping off their sins and canonizing their virtues, so that Gladstone had no connection with slavery, Chinese Gordon did not get drunk, William Pitt was a great patriot and not an international thief. Education was so ar- ranged that the young learned not necessarily the truth, but that aspect and interpretation of the truth which the rulers of the world wished them to know and follow. In other words, we had progress by poverty in the face of ac- cumulating wealth, and that poverty was not simply the poverty of the slaves of Africa and the peons of Asia, but the poverty of the mass of workers in England, France, Germany, and the United States. Art, in building, painting, and literature, became cynical and decadent. Literature became realistic and therefore pessimistic. Religion became organized in social clubs where well-bred people met in luxurious churches and gave alms to the poor. On Sunday they listened to sermons-"Blessed are the meek"; "Do unto others even as you would that others do unto 'You"; "If thine enemy smite thee, turn the other cheek"; "It is more blessed to give than to receive"-listened and acted as though they had read, as in very truth they ought to have read -"Might is right"; "Do others before they do you"; "Kill your enemies or be killed"; "Make profits by any methods and at any cost so long as you can escape the lenient law." This is a fair picture of the decadence of that Europe which led human civil- ization during the nineteenth century and looked unmoved on the writhing of Asia and of Africa. Nothing has been more puzzling than the European attitude toward sex. With professed reverence for female chastity, white folk have brought paid prostitution to its highest development; their lauding of motherhood has accompanied a lessening of births through late marriage and contraception, and this has stopped the growth of population in France and threatened it in all Europe. Indeed, along with the present rate of divorce, the future of the whole white race is problematical. Finally, the WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD 25 treatment of colored women by white men has been a world- wide disgrace. American planters, including some of the highest personages in the nation, left broods of colored children who were sometimes sold into slavery. William Howitt (1792-1879), an English Quaker, visited Australia and the East early in the nineteenth century and has left us a record of what he saw. Of the treatment of women in India he wrote: "The treatment of the females could not be de- scribed. Dragged from the inmost recesses of their houses, which the religion of the country had made so many sanctuaries, they were exposed naked to public view. The virgins were carried to. the Court of Justice, where they might naturally have looked for protection, but they now looked for it in vain; for in the face of the ministers of justice, in the face of the spectators, in the face of the sun, those tender and modest virgins were brutally violated. The only difference between their treatment and that of their mothers was that the former were dishonoured in the face of day, the latter in the gloomy recesses of their dungeon. Other females had the nipples of their breasts put in a cleft bamboo and torn off. What follows is too shocking and indecent to transcribe! It is almost impossible, in reading of these fright- ful and savage enormities, to believe that we are reading of a country under the British government, and that these unmanly deeds were perpetrated by British agents, and for the purpose· of extorting the British revenue." 1 It would be unfair to paint the total modern picture of Europe as decadent. There have been souls that revolted and voices that cried aloud. Men arraigned poverty, ignorance, and disease as unnecessary. The public school and the ballot fought for up- lift and freedom. Suffrage for women and laborers and freedom for the Negro were extended. But this forward-looking vision had but partial and limited success. Race tyranny, aristocratic pretense, monopolized wealth, still continued to prevail and 1William Howitt, Colonization and Christianity (London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green & Longmans, 1838),pp. 280-81. THE WORLD AND AFRICA triumphed widely. The Church fled uptown to escape the poor .and black. Jesus laughed-and wept. The dawn of the twentieth century found white Europe master of the world and the white peoples almost universally recognized as the rulers for whose benefit the rest of the world existed. Never before in the history of civilization had sel£- worship of a people's accomplishment attained the heights that ithe worship of white Europe by Europeans reached. Our poets in the "Foremost Ranks of Time," became dithy- rambic: "Better fifty years of Europe than a cycle of Cathay!" In home and school the legend grew of this strong, masterful ,giant with mighty intellect, clear brain, and unrivaled moral 'Stamina, who was conducting the world to the last heights of 'human culture. Yet within less than half a century this magnifi- -cent self-worshiping structure had crashed to the earth. Why was this? It was from no lack of power. The power of white Europe and North America was unquestionable. Their -science dominated the scientific thought of the world. The only writing called literature was that of English and French writers, of Germans and Italians, with some recognition of writers in Spain and the United States. The Christian religion, .as represented by the Catholic Church and the leading Protes- tant denominations, was the only system of belief recognized as real religion. Mohammedans, Buddhists, Shintoists, and others were all considered heathen. The most tremendous expression of power was economic; the powerful industrial organization and integration of modern industry in management and work, in trade and manufacture, was concentrated in England, France, Germany, and the United States. All Asia and Eastern Europe was an appendage; all Africa, China, India, and the islands of the sea, Central and South America and the Caribbean area were dominated by Europe, while Scandinavia, Holland, and Belgium were silent -copartners in this domination. The domination showed itself in its final form in political WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD power either through direct rulership, as in the case of colonies, or indirect economic power backed by military pressure exer- cised over the backward nations. It was rather definitely assumed in the latter part of the nineteenth century that this economic domination was but a passing phase which in time would lead to colonial absorption. Particularly was this true with regard to Asia. India was al- ready a part of the British Empire, and Burma. Indonesia was Dutch and Indo-China, French. The future of China depended upon how Europe would divide the land among the British Empire and the Germans, American trade, Italy, France, and Russia. It was a matter simply of time and agreement. General consent had long since decided that China should no longer rule itself. With regard to the South American countries there was the determination that they must obey the economic rule of the European and North American system. The world looked for- ward to political and economic domination by Europe and North America and to a more or less complete approach to colonial status for the rest of the earth. Africa of course must remain in absolute thrall, save its white immigrants, who would rule the blacks. The reason for this world mastery by Europe was rationalized as the natural and inborn superiority of white peoples, showing. itself not only in the loftiest of religions, but in a technical mastery of the forces of nature-all this in contrast to the low mentality and natural immorality of the darker races living in lovely lands, ",Vhere every prospect pleases, and only Man is vilel"-as the high-minded Christians sang piously. But they forgot or never were told just how white superiority wielded its. power or accomplished this dominion. There were exceptions. of course, but for the most part they went unheard. Howitt, for instance, wrote from personal knowledge as well as research on the colonial question and described some phases of the pressure' of Europe on the rest of the world in the centuries preceding the THE WORLD AND AFRICA nineteenth. Speaking of the Indians of America, Howitt said: "All the murders and desolation of the most pitiless tyrants that ever diverted themselves with the pangs and convulsions of their fellow creatures, fall infinitely short of the bloody enormi- ties committed by the Spanish nation in the conquest of the New World, a conquest on a low estimate, effected by the murder of ten millions of the species! After reading these accounts, who can help forming an indignant wish that the hand of Heaven, by some miraculous interposition, had swept these European tyrants from the face of the earth, who like so many beasts of prey, roamed round the world only to desolate and destroy; and more remorseless than the fiercest savage, thirsted for human blood without having the impulse of natural appetite to plead in their defence!" 2 Howitt turned to the Portuguese in India: "The celebrated Alphonso Albuquerque made the most rapid strides, and ex- tended the conquests of the Portuguese there beyond any other commander. He narrowly escaped with his life in endeavouring to sack and plunder Calicut. He seized on Goa, which thence- forward became the metropolis of all the Portuguese settlements in India. He conquered Molucca, and gave it up to the plunder of his soldiers. The fifth part of the wealth thus thievishly ac- quired was reserved for the king, and was purchased on the spot by the merchants for two hundred thousand pieces of gold. Having established a garrison in the conquered city, he made a traitor Indian, who had deserted from the king of Molucca and had been an instrument in the winning of a place, supreme magistrate; but again finding Utimut, the renegade, as faithless to himself, he had him and his son put to death, even though a hundred thousand pieces of gold, a bait that was not easily iresisted by these Christian marauders, was offered for their lives. He then proceeded to Ormuz in the Persian Gulph, which was a great harbour for the Arabian merchants; reduced it, placed a :garrison in it, seized on fifteen princes of the blood, and carried :2 Ibid., p. 61. WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD them off to Goa. Such were some of the deeds of this celebrated general, whom the historians in the same breath in which they record these unwarrantable acts of violence, robbery, and treachery, term an excellent and truly glorious commander! He made a descent on the isle of Ceylon, and detached a fleet to the Moluccas, which established a settlement in those delightful regions of the cacao, the sago-tree, the nutmeg, and the clove. The kings of Persia, of Siam, Pegu, and others, alarmed at his triumphant progress, sought his friendship; and he completed the conquest of the Malabar coast. With less than forty thousand troops, the Portuguese struck terror into the empire of Morocco, the barbarous nations of Africa, the Mamelucs, the Arabians, and all the eastern countries from the island of Ormuz to China." 8 Turning to the Dutch, Howitt continued: "To secure the dominion of these, they compelled the princes of Ternate and Tidore to consent to the rooting up of all the clove and nutmeg trees in the islands not entirely under the jealous safeguard of Dutch keeping. For this they utterly exterminated the inhabitants of Banda, because they would not submit passively to their yoke. Their lands were divided amongst the white people, who got slaves from other islands to cultivate them. For this Malacca was besieged, its territory rav- aged, and its navigation interrupted by pirates; Negapatan was twice attacked; Cochin was engaged in resisting the kings of Calicut and Travancore, and Ceylon and Java were made scenes of perpetual disturbances. These notorious dissensions have been followed by as odious oppressions, which have been prac- ticed at Japan, China, Cambodia, Arracan on the banks of the Ganges, at Achen, Coromandel, Surat, in Persia, at Bassora, Mocha, and other places. For this they encouraged and estab- lished in Celebes a system of kidnapping the inhabitants for slaves which converted that island into a perfect hell." 4 a Ibid., pp. 176-77. 4 Ibid., p. 194. THE WORLD AND AFRICA Howitt then turned to England in India: "Unfortunately, we all know what human nature is. Unfortunately, the power, the wealth, and the patronage brought home to them by the very violation of their own wishes and maxims were of such an over- whelming and seducing nature that it was in vain to resist them. Nay, in such colours does the modern philosophy of conquest and diplomacy disguise the worst transactions between one state and another, that it is not for plain men very readily to penetrate to the naked enormity beneath." 5 "But if there ever was one system more Machiavelian-more appropriative of the shew of justice where the basest injustice was attempted-more cold, cruel, haughty, and unrelenting than another-it is the system by which the government of the different states of India has been wrested from the hands of their respective princes and collected into the grasp of the British power." 6 "The first step in the English friendship with the native princes, has generally been to assist them against their neigh- bours with troops, or to locate troops with them to protect them from aggression. For these services such enormous recompense was stipulated for, that the unwary princes, entrapped by their fears of their native foes rather than of their pretended friends, soon found that they were utterly unable to discharge them. Dreadful exactions were made on their subjects, but in vain. Whole provinces, or the revenues of them, were soon obliged to be made over to their grasping friends; but they did not suffice for their demands. In order to pay them their debts or their interest, the princes were obliged to borrow large sums at an extravagant rate. These sums were eagerly advanced by the Eng- lish in their private and individual capacities, and securities again taken on lands or revenues. At every step the unhappy princes became more and more embarrassed, and as the em- 5 Ibid., p. 209. 6 I bid., p. 210. WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD barrassment increased, the claims of the Company became pro- portionably pressing. In the technical phraseology of money- lenders, 'the screw was then turned,' till there was no longer any enduring it." 7 We may turn now to the conquest of Africa. The Portuguese, Dutch, and British decimated the West Coast with the slave trade. The Arabs depopulated the East Coast. For centuries the native Bantu, unable to penetrate the close-knit city-states of the Gulf of Guinea, had slowly been moving south, seeking pasture for their herds and protecting their culture from the encroach- ment of the empire-building in the black Sudan. In the nineteenth century black folk and white-Hottentot, Bushman and Bantu, French, Dutch, and British-met at the Cape miscalled "Good Hope." There ensued a devil's dance seldom paralleled in human history. The Dutch murdered, raped, and enslaved the Hottentots and Bushmen; the French were driven away or died out; the British stole the land of the Dutch and their slaves and the Dutch fled inland. The incoming Bantu, led by Chaka, the great Zulu chieftain, fell on both Dutch and English with a military genius unique in history. The black Bantu had almost won the wars when a mulatto native discovered diamonds. Then English and Dutch laid bare that cache of gold, the largest in the world, which the ocean thrust above the dark waters of the south five million years ago. Enough; the greed of white Europe, backed by the British Navy, fought with frenzied determination, world-wide or- ganization, and every trick of trade, until the blacks were either dead or reduced to the most degrading wage bondage in the modern world; and the Dutch became vassals of England, to be repaid by the land and labor of eight million blacks. Frankel, the complacent servant of capitalists and their de- fender, has written: "The wealth accruing from the produc- tion of diamonds in South Africa has probably been greater 7 Ibid., pp. 1113-14. THE WORLD AND AFRICA than that which has ever been obtained from any other com- modity in the same time anywhere in the world." 8 This was but a side enterprise of Britain. By means of its long leadership in the African slave trade to America, Great Britain in the nineteenth century began to seize control of land and labor all over Africa. Slowly the British pushed into the West and, East coasts. They overthrew Benin and Ashanti. A British governor of Ashanti later admitted: "The earliest beginnings, which had their inception in the dark days of the slave trade, cannot but hold many things that modern Eng- lishmen must recall with mingled shame and horror. The reader will find much to deplore in the public and private acts of many of the white men who, in their time, made history on the Coast; and some deeds were done which must forever re- main among the most bitter and humiliating memories of every Britisher who loves his country and is jealous of its fair name." 9 The French conquered Dahomey and the remains of the Mandingo, Haussa, and other kingdoms. The British pitted Christianity against Islam in East Africa and let them fight it out until at last Uganda became a British protectorate. In Abyssinia the natives drove back British, Egyptians, and Italians, and the Mahdi with his black Mohammedan hordes came in from the west and drove England and Egypt out of the Sudan. The threat of the French and their possible alli- ance with Abyssinia brought the British back with machine guns. It is said that Kitchener's warfare against the followers of the Mahdi was so brutal that even the British Tories were re- volted. His own brother-in-law said of him: "Well, if you do J not bring down a curse on the British Empire for what you have been doing there is no truth in Christianity." His dese- 8 S. Herbert Frankel, Capital Investment in Africa (London: Oxford Uni- versity Press, 1938),p. 52. 9 W. Walton Claridge, A History of the Gold Coast and Ashanti (London: John Murray, 1915),Vol. I, p. ix. WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD 33 cration of the Mahdi's tomb even Winston Churchill called a "foul deed." And when Kitchener found that even the pro- moters of the inexcusable war could not swallow this last, he tried to put the blame of the desecration onto Gordon's nephew by making absolutely false accusations.'? Everywhere is this sordid tale of deception, force, murder, and final subjection. We need hardly recall the Opium War in China, which the British, followed by the Americans and French, made excuse for further aggression. The singular thing about this European movement of ag- gression and dominance was the rationalization for it. Mis- sionary effort during the nineteenth and early twentieth cen- tury was widespread. Millions of pounds and dollars went into the "conversion of the heathen" to Christianity and the edu- cation of the natives. Some few efforts, as in Liberia and Sierra Leone, were made early in the nineteenth century to establish independent Negro countries, but this was before it was real- ized that political domination was necessary to full exploita- tion. Slowly the Sudan from the Atlantic to the Nile was con- quered. Slowly Egypt itself and the Egyptian Sudan passed under the control of Europe. The resistance of Nubia and Ethiopia was almost in vain down into the twentieth century. West Africa fought brilliantly and continuously. But in all this development the idea persisted in European minds that no matter what the cost in cruelty, lying, and blood, the triumph of Europe was to the glory of God and the untram- meled power of the only people on earth who deserved to rule; that the right and justice of their rule was proved by their own success and particularly by their great cities, their enor- mous technical mastery over the power of nature, their gi- gantic manufacture of goods and systems of transportation over the world. Production for production'S sake, without in- 10 Ct. Wilfrid Seawen Blunt, My Diaries (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1921), Vol. I, pp. 311, 313, 317, 319, 322, 323-24. The brother-in-law was Sir William Butler. 34 THE WORLD AND AFRICA quiry as to how the wealth and services were distributed, was the watchword of the day. For years the British imperial government avoided direct responsibility for colonial exploitation. It was all at first "free enterprise" and "individual initiative." When the scandal of murder and loot could no longer be ignored, exploitation be- came socialized with imperialism. Thus, for a century or more the West India Company, the Niger Company, the South and East Africa Companies, robbed and murdered as they pleased with no public accounting. At length, when these companies had stolen, killed, and cheated to such an extent that the facts could not be suppressed, governments themselves came into control, curbing the more outrageous excesses and rational- izing the whole system. Science was called to help. Students of Africa, especially since the ivory-sugar-cotton-Negro complex of the nineteenth century, became hag-ridden by the obsession that nothing civilized is Negroid and every evidence of high culture in Africa must be white or at least yellow. The very vocabulary of civilization expressed this idea; the Spanish word "Negro," from being a descriptive adjective, was raised to the substantive name of a race and then deprived of its capital letter. Then came efforts to bring harmony and co-operation and unity-among the exploiters. A newspaper correspondent who had received world-wide publicity because of his travels in Africa was hired by the shrewd and unscrupulous Leopold II of Belgium to establish an international country in central Africa "to peacefully conquer and subdue it, to remold it in harmony with modern ideas into National States, within whose limits the European merchant shall go hand in hand with the dark African trader, and justice and law and order shall pre- vail, and murder and lawlessness and the cruel barter of slaves shall be overcome." 11 11.J. Scott Keltie, The Partition of Africa (London: Edward Stanford. 1B95), p. 132. WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD 35 Thus arose the Congo Free State, and by balancing the secret designs of German, French, and British against each other, this state became the worst center of African exploitation and started the partition of Africa among European powers. It was designed to form a pattern for similar partition of Asia and the South Sea islands. The Berlin Congress and Conference followed. The products of Africa began to be shared and dis- tributed around the world. The dependence of civilized life upon products from the ends of the world tied the everyday citizen more and more firmly to the exploitation of each colonial area: tea and coffee, diamonds and gold, ivory and copper, vegetable oils, nuts and dates, pepper and spices, olives and cocoa, rubber, hemp, silk, fibers of all sorts, rare metals, valuable lumber, fruit, sugar. All these things and a hundred others became necessary to modern life, and modern life thus was built around colonial ownership and exploitation. The cost of this exploitation was enormous. The colonial system caused ten times more deaths than actual war. In the first twenty-five years of the nineteenth century famines in India starved a million men, and famine was bound up with exploitation. Widespread monopoly of land to deprive all men of primary sources of support was carried out either through direct ownership or indirect mortgage and exorbitant interest. Disease could not be checked: tuberculosis 'in the mines of South Africa, syphilis in all colonial regions, cholera, leprosy, malaria. One of the worst things that happened was the complete and deliberate breaking-down of cultural patterns among the sup- pressed peoples. "Europe was staggered at the Leopoldian atrocities, and they were terrible indeed; but what we, who were behind the scenes, felt most keenly was the fact that the real catastrophe in the Congo was desolation and murder in the larger sense. The invasion of family life, the ruthless de- struction of every social barrier, the shattering of every tribal law, the introduction of criminal practices which struck the THE WORLD AND AFRICA chiefs of the people dumb with horror-in a word, a veritable avalanche of filth and immorality overwhelmed the Congo tribes." 12 The moral humiliation forced on proud black people was illustrated in the British conquest of Ashanti. The reigning Asantahene had never been conquered. His armies had re- peatedly driven back the British, but the British finally tri- umphed after five wars by breaking their word and overwhelm- ing him by numbers and superior weapons. They promised him peace and honor, but they demanded a public act of sub- mISSIOn. "This, of course, was a terrible blow to Prempi's pride. It was a thing that no Ashanti king had ever done before, ex- cept when Mensa voluntarily made his submission by deputy in 1881; and was the one thing above all others that he would have avoided if he could. For a few moments he sat irresolute, nervously toying with his ornaments and looking almost ready to cry with shame and annoyance; but Albert Ansa came up and held a whispered conversation with him, and he then slipped off his sandals and, laying aside the golden circlet he wore on his head, stood up with his mother and walked re- luctantly across the square to where the Governor was sitting. Then, halting before him, they prostrated themselves and em- braced his feet and those of Sir Francis Scott and Colonel Kempster. "The scene was a most striking one. The heavy masses of foliage, that solid square of red coats and glistening bayonets, the artillery drawn up ready for any emergency, the black bodies of the Native Levies, resting on their long guns in the background, while inside the square the Ashantis sat as if turned to stone, as Mother and Son, whose word was a matter of life and death, and whose slightest move constituted a com- mand which all obeyed, were thus forced to humble themselves in sight of the assembled thousands." 13 12 Harris, Dawn in Africa. p. 66. 13 Claridge. op. cit., Vol. I. P: 413. WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD 37 Perhaps the worst thing about the colonial system was the contradiction which arose and had to arise in Europe with regard to the whole situation. Extreme poverty in colonies was a main cause of wealth and luxury in Europe. The results of this poverty were disease, ignorance, and crime. Yet these had to be represented as natural characteristics of backward peo- ples. Education for colonial people must inevitably mean un- rest and revolt; education, therefore, had to be limited and used to inculcate obedience and servility lest the whole colonial system be overthrown. Ability, self-assertion, resentment, among colonial peoples must be represented as irrational efforts of "agitators"-folk trying to attain that for which they were not by nature fitted. To prove the unfitness of most human beings for self-rule and self-expression, every device of science was used: evolution was made to prove that Negroes and Asiatics were less developed human beings than whites; history was so written as to make all civilization the development of white people; economics was so taught as to make all wealth due mainly to the technical accomplishment of white folks supplemented only by the brute toil of colored peoples; brain weights and intelligence tests were used and distorted to prove the superiority of white folk. The result was complete domination of the world by Europe and North America and a culmination and tempo of civiliza- tion singularly satisfactory to the majority of writers and think- ers at the beginning of the twentieth century. But it was a re- sult that was hollow, contradictory, and fatal, as the next few years quickly showed. The proof of this came first from the colonial peoples them- selves. Almost unnoticed, certainly unlistened to, there came from the colonial world reiterated protest, prayers, and appeals against the suppression of human beings, against the exclusion of the majority of mankind from the vaunted progress of the world. The world knows of such protests from the National Congress of India, but little has been written of the protests THE WORLD AND AFRICA of Africa. For instance, on the Gold Coast, British West Africa, in 1871, some of the kings and chiefs and a number of edu- cated natives met at Mankesim and drew up a constitution for self-government. These members of the Fanti tribe were in alliance with England and had supported the British against the Ashanti in the five long wars. They now proposed an alli- ance with Britain to establish self-government. This constitu- tion, the Mfantsi Amanbuhu Fekuw or Fanti Confederation, agitated in 1865, organized in 1867, and adopted in 1871, con- sisted of forty-seven articles, many of which were subdivided into several sections. Some of the principal articles were as follows: Article 8. That it be the object of the Confederation § 1. To promote friendly intercourse between all the Kings and Chiefs of Fanti, and to unite them for offensive and defensive purposes against their common enemy. § 2. To direct the labours of the Confederation towards the improvement of the country at large. § 3. To make good and substantial roads through-out all the interior districts included in the Confederation. § 4. To erect school-houses and establish schools for the edu- cation of all children within the Confederation and to obtain the service of efficient schoolmasters. § 5. To promote agricultural and industrial pursuits, and to endeavour to introduce such new plants as may hereafter become sources of profitable commerce to the country. § 6. To develop and facilitate the working of the mineral and other resources of the country. Article 12. That this Representative Assembly shall have the power of preparing laws, ordinances, bills, etc., of using proper means for effectually carrying out the resolutions, etc., of the Government, of examining any questions laid before it by the ministry, and by any of the Kings and Chiefs, and, in fact, of exercising all the functions of a legislative body. Articles 21 to 25 deal with education. WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD 39 Article 26. That main roads be made connecting various provinces or districts with one another and with the sea coast. ... Article 37. That in each province or district provincial courts be established, to be presided over by the provincial assessors. Article 43. That the officers of the Confederation shall render assist- ance as directed by the executive in carrying out the wishes of the British Government. Article 44. That it be o?mpetent to the Representative Assembly, for the purpose of carrying on the administration of the Government, to pass laws, etc., for the levying of such taxes as it may seem necessary.t+ This was the so-called Fanti Federation, and in punishment for daring to propose such a movement for the government of an African British colony, the participants were promptly thrown in jail and charged with treason. This attitude toward native rights and initiative has con- tinued right down to our day. In 1945 the colored people of South Africa, speaking for eight million Negroes, Indians, and mixed groups, sent out this declaration to the proposed United Nations: The non-European is debarred from education. He is denied access to the professions and skilled trades'; he is denied the right to buy land and property; he is denied the right to trade or to serve in the army- except as a stretcher-bearer or servant; he is prohibited from entering places of entertainment and culture. But still more, he is not allowed to live in the towns. And if it was a crime in Nazi Germany for an "Aryan" to mix with or marry a non-Aryan, it is equally a criminal offence in South Africa for a member of the Herrenvolk to mix with or marry with the slave race .... In the majority of instances there is a sep- arate law for Europeans and a separate law for non-Europeans; in those rare cases where one Act legislates for both, there are separate clauses discriminating against the non-Europeans. While it is true that there are no Buchenwald concentration camps in South Africa, it is equally true that the prisons of South Africa are full to overflowing with non-Europeans whose criminality lies solely in the fact that they 14 Ibid., Vol. I, pp. 617-18. THE WORLD AND AFRICA are unable to pay the poll-tax, a special, racial tax imposed upon them. But this law does not apply to the Aryan; for him there is a different law which makes the nonpayment of taxes not a criminal, but a civil, offence for which he cannot be imprisoned. But if there is no Buchenwald in South Africa, the sadistic fury with which the Herrenvolk policemen belabour the non-European victim, guilty or not guilty, is comparable only to the brutality of the S.S. Guards. Moreover, the treatment meted out to the non-European in the Law Courts is comparable only to the fate of the non-Aryan in the Nazi Law Courts. But the fundamental difference in law and morality is not only expressed in different paragraphs of the Legal Statutes, it lies in the fundamentally different concept of the value of the life of a non-European as compared with the value placed upon the life of a European. The life of a non-European is very cheap in South Africa, as cheap as the life of a Jew in Nazi Germany. From the foregoing it is clear that the non-Europeans of South Africa live and suffer under a tyranny very little different from Nazism. And if we accept the premise-as we hope the Nations of the World do- that peace is indivisible, if we accept that there can be no peace as long as the scourge of Nazism exists in any corner of the globe, then it follows that the defeat of German Nazism is not the final chapter of the struggle against tyranny. There must be many more chapters before the peoples of the world will be able to make a new beginning. To us in South Africa it is indisputable that there can be no peace as long as this system of tyranny remains. To us it is ludicrous that this same South African Herrenvolk should speak abroad of a new beginning, of shaping a new world order, whereas in actuality all they wish is the retention of the present tyranny in South Africa, and its extension to new territories. Already they speak of new mandates and new trusteeships, which can only mean the extension of their Nazi- like domination over still wider terrain. It is impossible to make a new start as long as the representatives of this Herrenvolk take any part in the shaping of it. For of what value can it be when the very same people who speak so grandiosely abroad of the inviolability of human rights, at home trample ruthlessly underfoot those same in- alienable rights? It is the grossest of insults not only to the eight mil- lion non-Europeans of South Africa, but to all those who are honestly striving to shape a world on new foundations, when the highest repre- WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD sentative of the Herrenvolk of South Africa, Field-Marshal Smuts, who has devoted his whole life to the entrenchment of this Nazi-like domination, brazenly speaks to the Nations of the World of the "sanc- tity and ultimate value of human personality" and "the equal rights of men and women." 15 This does not say that all European civilization is oppres- sion, theft, and hypocrisy; there has been evidence of selfless religious faith; of philanthropic effort for social uplift; of in- dividual honesty and sacrifice. But this, far from answering the indictment I have made, shows even more clearly the moral plight of present European culture and what capitalistic investment and imperialism have done to it. Because of the stretch in time and space between the deed and the result, between the work and the product, it is not only usually impossible for the worker to know the consumer; or the investor, the source of his profit, but also it is often made impossible by law to inquire into the facts. Moral judgment of the industrial process is therefore difficult, and the crime is more often a matter of ignorance rather than of deliberate murder and theft; but ignorance is a colossal crime in itself. When a culture consents to any economic result, no matter how monstrous its cause, rather than demand the facts concerning work, wages, and the conditions of life whose results make the life of the consumer comfortable, pleasant, and even luxurious, it is an indication of a collapsing civilization. Here for instance is a lovely British home, with green lawns, appropriate furnishings and a retinue of well-trained servants. Within is a young woman, well trained and well dressed, in- telligent and high-minded. She is fingering the ivory keys of a grand piano and pondering the problem of her summer vacation, whether in Switzerland or among the Italian lakes; her family is not wealthy, but it has a sufficient "independent" income from investments to enjoy life without hard work. 15 A Declaration to the Nations of the World issued by the Non- European United Committee, Cape Town, South Africa, "945. 42 THE WORLD AND AFRICA How far is such a person responsible for the crimes of coloni- alism? It will in all probability not occur to her that she has any responsibility whatsoever, and that may well be true. Equally, it may be true that her income is the result of starvation, theft, and murder; that it involves ignorance, disease, and crime on the part of thousands; that the system which sustains the se- curity, leisure, and comfort she enjoys is based on the sup- pression, exploitation, and slavery of the majority of mankind. Yet just because she does not know this, just because she could get the facts only after research and investigation-made diffi- cult by laws that forbid the revealing of ownership of property, source of income, and methods of business-she is content to remain in ignorance of the source of her wealth and its cost in human toil and suffering. The frightful paradox that is the indictment of modern civilization and the cause of its moral collapse is that a blame- less, cultured, beautiful young woman in a London suburb may be the foundation on which is built the poverty and degradation of the world. For this someone is guilty as hell. Who? This is the modern paradox of Sin before which the Puritan stands open-mouthed and mute. A group, a nation, or a race commits murder and rape, steals and destroys, yet no indi- vidual is guilty, no one is to blame, no one can be punished! The black world squirms beneath the feet of the white in impotent fury or sullen hate: I hate them, 0 I hate them welll I hate them, Christ, as I hate helll If I were God, I'd sound their knell, This day! The whole world emerges into the Syllogism of the Satisfied: "This cannot be true. This is not true. If it were true I would not believe it. If it is true I do not believe it. Therefore it is false!" Only an Emerson could see the paradox: WHITE MASTERS OF THE WORLD 43 o all you virtues, methods, mights; Means, appliances, delights; Reputed wrongs, and braggart rights; Smug routine, and things allowed; Minorities, things under cloud, Hither take me, use me, fill me, Vein and artery, though ye kill me. In 1945 Jan Smuts, Prime Minister of South Africa, who had once declared that every white man in South Africa be- lieves in the suppression of the Negro except those who are "mad, quite mad," stood before the assembled peoples of the world and pleaded for an article on "human rights" in the United Nations Charter. Nothing so vividly illustrates the twisted contradiction of thought in the minds of white men. What brought it about? What caused this paradox? I believe that the trade in human beings between Africa and America, which flourished between the Renaissance and the American Civil War, is the prime and effective cause of the contradic- tions in European civilization and the illogic in modern thought and the collapse of human culture. For this reason I am turning to a history of the African slave trade in support of this thesis. CHAPTER III THE RAPE OF AFRICA Nothing which has happened to man in modern times has been more significant than the buy- ing and selling of human beings out of Africa into America from I44I to I870. Of its world- wide meaning and effect, this chapter seeks to tell. THE rebirth of civilization in Europe began in the fifteenthcentury. At this time African and Asiatic civilizations far outstripped that of Europe. In the black Sudan nations, civili- zations had risen and fallen even earlier. Melle, which flour- ished in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, fell before the empire of the Songhay, which in the fifteenth century became a vast, organized government two-thirds the size of the United States, with trade and commerce and cultural connections, through its University of Sankore, with Spain, Italy, and the Eastern Roman Empire. The city-states and Atlantic culture of the West Coast of Africa had fought back triple pressure from the Sudan, the Arabs in the Nile valley, and the emigrat- ing Bantu sweeping down on the kingdoms of the Congo. It was here that the rape of Africa began and transformed the world. There can be little doubt but that in the fourteenth century the level of culture in black Africa south of the Sudan 44 THE RAPE OF AFRICA 45 was equal to that of Europe and was so recognized. There is even less doubt but that Negroid influence in the valley of the Nile was a main influence in Egypt's development from 2100 to 1600 B.G; while in East, South, and West Africa hu- man culture had from 1600 B.C. to A.D. 1500 its monuments of a vigorous past and a growing future. What changed all this? What killed the Sudanese empires, brought anarchy into the valley of the Nile, decimated the thick populations of East and Central Africa, and pressed the culture of West Africa beneath the ruthless heel of the rising European culture? In Europe during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries there began to appear national integration of culture patterns, with no little inspiration from the East and from Africa. There followed in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries increased freedom of thought and impatience with dogma; and in the seventeenth, came scientific inquiry and the beginning of a demand for democratic control of government. But from 1400 to 1800 also came discovery, trade, and the beginnings of a new enslavement of labor. In the eighteenth century these developments leaped into opposition. The slav- ery of labor expanded enormouslyjn the New World, con- current with a new development of trade, industry, and wealth in the Old. These trends met head on with a revolutionary de- mand for democracy and social freedom in Europe. The clash of ideals was revealed in the nineteenth century by freedom for exploitation of slaves in America and a consequent reaction against the demands of European labor led by Napoleon and British capital. Let us follow the details of this story. The importance of the discovery of America was not the treasure of precious metals it provided, but the new and wid- ening market and source of supply it offered European manu- facturers by the exchange of tobacco, sugar, and cotton for manufactured goods. Its first effect was to raise the mercantile system to glory and splendor. World trade increased enor- mously. The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were the THE WORLD AND AFRICA centuries of trade, and eventually, by the rise of capitalism, the nineteenth century became the century of production. During the Middle Ages there had been little direct com- merce between Europe and West Africa. Arabs, Berbers, and eventually Negroids like the Mandingos became intermediaries for the trade between Europe and the Sudan. Rumors filtered through the Moroccan ports regarding the Kingdom of Ghana, the Niger, "the western Nile," and the black peoples round about. The Arabs bought gold from the Negroes and sold it to the Jewish merchants in Majorca. The demand of Europe in the fifteenth century was for new and shorter paths to the East, to the spices, silks, and other lux- urious articles of the East. In this quest Spain found silver in the New World, and Portugal triumphed when she found gold in Africa. The Portuguese trade monopoly with Africa and thence to India extended over half a century. She developed an empire of tremendous wealth. The object of Prince Henry (1394-1460) of Portugal was mainly trade to India. At the same time he hoped by union with Prester John of Ethiopia to evangelize the Negroes of all Africa and make common cause against the Mohammedans. Henry heard of the gold for which the Carthaginians had bartered at Timbuktu. Having seized Ceuta, he began to ex- plore, and after nineteen years his seamen rounded Cape Bojador. In 1441 Goncalves brought to Lisbon the first cargo of slaves and gold. Very shortly a flourishing trade in gold, slaves, os- trich feathers, amber, and gum opened up between Portugal and black Africa. The Portuguese tried to conceal this trade from the rest of Europe. They did not actually find the black kingdom of Ghana, but they called the coast which" they did discover "Guinea," after mysterious Ghana. They heard of the empire of Melle at Timbuktu but did not actually reach it. They had commerce with the kingdom of the Jolofs and with other coast tribes. Eventually they reached the Gold THE RAPE OF AFRICA 47 Coast, or as they called it, "the Mine," where gold could be had in large quantities. They found that these Negroes were great traders who brought the gold from the interior when they could persuade the coast tribes who lived by fishing to let the gold bearers through. Eventually they came in contact with the kingdom of Benin and a mighty interior empire whose sovereign was the Ogani. For fifty years, from 1480 to 1530, the Portuguese had a monopoly of the Guinea trade and reaped huge profits, sel- dom less than 50 per cent and sometimes as high as 800 per cent. Between 1450 and 1458 ten or twelve ships a year were sent to Guinea, and the amount of gold dust reached a value of over two million dollars a year, and after 1471 rapidly ex- ceeded this. Next to the trade in gold came the highly important im- portation of labor into Portugal. By the middle of the fifteenth century nearly a thousand blacks had been imported. A cen- tury later a vast majority of the inhabitants of the southern- most province were Negroids, and even up as far as Lisbon, Negroes outnumbered the whites. The two races intermingled, resulting in the Negroid characteristics of the Portuguese na- tion even today.' The royal family became more Negro than white. John IV was Negroid; and the wife of the French ambassador described John VI as having Negro hair, nose, lips, and color. Negro blood in the fifteenth century extended from Spain and Portugal to Italy. The Medici had colored descendants like Alessandro, first reigning duke of Florence, whose father was reported to be the Pope. This new strain of Negro blood reached Albania and Austria. Angelo Solliman, a Congo Ne- gro, was a favorite of Joseph II and of Prince Lichtenstein in 1Mary Wilhelmine Williams, writing on Slavery in the Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1934) Vol. 14, p. 80. For other facts and allusions in this chapter, consult John W. Blake, European Beginnings in West Africa (New York: Longmans, Green & Co., 1937)' THE WORLD AND AFRICA the eighteenth century. He married into the Austrian nobility, and his daughter married Baron Eduard von Feuchtersleben. Their son inherited the title. Recently in Rome a monument was dedicated to the colored consort of Garibaldi, Anita, a Brazilian. The Guinea trade was at first mainly in gold, pepper, and other commodities, with some trading in slaves which went to Europe. In the sixteenth century, however, it began to change, and slaves began to be sent to South America. This was not at first a large trade and did not compete with legiti- mate commerce; but it grew, and by 1540 reached ten thou- sand slaves a year. The reason for this was not far to seek. Between 1480 and 1578 the peoples of Guinea enjoyed a vigor- ous life with economic independence based on foreign trade. Gold, ivory, and pepper were valuable as exports before the discovery of America and continued long afterward. But by the middle of the sixteenth century there was trouble in West Africa. A vast migration of black people, the Limbas, moved slowly westward from Central Africa. They were a part of the migration of the Bantu moving down from the Mohammedan invasion of the Nile Valley and the empire-building of the black kingdoms of the Sudan. They destroyed villages, massa- cred the inhabitants, and were soon in fierce competition with the Souzas, who possessed the most formidable native army in West Africa at that time. Migration and native wars lasted for a generation. This meant that the cheap labor of captives be- came available on the West Coast and opened the way for the beginning of the American slave trade. With this slave trade came trouble, not simply among native tribes but also between the Portuguese and the natives. After 1530 the Portuguese empire in Guinea was a vast com- mercial enterprise, but the overhead charges, caused by diffi- culties with the natives and the beginning of European com- petition, equaled and began to exceed production. The first threat to Portuguese dominance in Guinea came from the ..~-- --. THE PRODUCTS OF AFRICA THE WORLD AND AFRICA French. By the Treaty of Crespy in 1544 the right of French- men to trade in the Indies, east and west, was proposed but not ratified. French trade began to multiply after 1553; relations between Portugal and France became strained on account of the French pirates and privateers. The monopoly of the Portu- guese in West Africa practically ended in 1553. The French Huguenots forced themselves into the Guinea trade after 1571, under the inspiration of Admiral Coligny. British merchants during the reign of Queen Mary became interested. Queen Elizabeth fought the monopoly claims of Portugal and Spain and herself participated in the Guinea trade. Between 1559 and 1561 the British explorer, Martin Fro- bisher, took part in piracy and trade. From 1561 to 1571 the British trade increased over the French and there was direct traffic between England and Africa. "The first Englishman of note to engage in the traffic was the celebrated John Hawkins, afterwards knighted by Elizabeth and appointed Treasurer to the Navy. Froude calls him 'a peculiarly characteristic figure,' and he certainly presents that blending of piracy and piety, rascality and religion, so common in the days of Elizabeth and not altogether unknown in ours. Hawkins appears to have had his eye for a long time on the slave trade as a very lucrative business, and as the Spaniards claimed a practical monopoly, patriotic feeling-the desire to break down the Spanish claim -went, as is again not unusual, with profit. At any rate, after a reconnoitering trip, Hawkins returned to England and fitted out an expedition of five vessels, to which were later added another three. In this venture, the Earl of Leicester, the Earl of Pembroke, and others took shares. So did Queen Elizabeth. She lent the ship Jesus, and Hawkins drew up rules for his men, the two first of which ran: 'Serve God daily,' and 'Love one another: The piety of the expedition was beyond reproach. So was its practice, as we read that finding the natives of Cape Verde to be of 'a nature very gentle and loving,' and 'more civil than any others,' Hawkins prepared to kidnap a number THE RAPE OF AFRICA of them. After sailing for some time, 'burning and spoiling,' he landed in the Spanish American settlements and compelled the colonists to purchase the slaves at his own price. Quite fit- tingly, Hawkins was granted a coat o£arms consisting of 'a demi-Moor in his proper colours, bound and captive,' as a token of the new trade he had opened to Englishmen." 2 Meantime disaster overtook the Portuguese. King Sebastian attacked the Moors in North Africa and was killed. His death in 1578 changed the position of Guinea. Within two years Portugal had passed under the domination of Spain, and West Africa with some resistance submitted to Spain. Philip II of Spain (1527-1598) was able to defend to some extent his Afri- can empire, but eventually Spain was cut off from Africa by papal decree. Then came Portugal's annexation to Spain in 1581 and the loss of Spanish maritime power by the destruction of the Armada in 1588, which was a death blow to the com- mercial empire of Spain and Portugal. The Protestants of England, the Huguenots of France, and the Calvinists of Holland started mortal struggle for Guinea. Eagerly the Dutch took over the Portuguese islands and settle- ments and formed in 1602 the East India Company. With the seventeenth century the battle of commerce was on. The Dutch and the British fought to a finish in the At- lantic to dominate the Atlantic trade. The Portuguese, British, and Dutch fought in India. Between them they killed the trade of the German Hanseatic League and overthrew the eco- nomic dominance of Spain. Cromwell seized Jamaica as a center of British slavery and the slave trade. In Africa the kingdoms of the black Sudan moved east and displaced the Nilotic Negroes. From among these, peoples like those of the Fang and the Bambara kingdoms between the Nile and the West Coast pressed farther down upon the withdrawing Bantu. In the seventeenth century the African slave trade to America 2 Chapman Cohen, Christianity, Slavery and Labour (London: Pioneer Press, 1931, issued for The Secular Society, Limited), pp. 46--47. 52 THE WORLD AND AFRICA expanded. It was not yet however a trade which made the word synonymous with Negro or black: during these years the Mo- hammedan rulers of Egypt were buying white slaves by 'the tens of thousands in Europe and Asia and bringing them to Syria, Palestine, and the Valley of the Nile. In the west, how- ever, the character of world trade began subtly to change. While the theory of mercantilism still prevailed in academic circles and commerce continued to pour African gold into Europe, and while the Negroes and Arabs sent gold to India to bedeck the gorgeous moguls, in practical commerce the im- portation of gold from Africa and silver from Peru was losing its dominant attraction. What was needed was human labor; labor to raise food in Spain and Portugal; labor to raise sugar and tobacco in the West Indies and North America. The labor situation in Europe at the time made slave labor in America peculiarly profitable. The working population of Europe in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries was limited. The devastation of the Thirty Years' War and the demand for labor and services on the feudal estates made any large-scale exportation of labor to America unthinkable. On the other hand, sugar, cotton, and tobacco were suitable to mass produc- tion on the plantations with conventional standards of work, simple tools, and comparatively small outlay for clothing and food. The organized slave gang was more profitable on the land than the peasant proprietor. The new capitalism as a method of production and trade began to supplant the farmer and merchant at home in Europe. In 1660 the upheaval of Civil War in England was at an end, and England was ready to embark on the slave trade for the benefit of her sugar and tobacco colonies .. The Brit- ish increased the import of slaves to America, raised sugar, indigo, and cotton, and began to bring these goods to Eng- land for processing. They then exported some of these proc- essed foods to Africa to buy more slaves. Trade began to change from a gambler's search for treasure to investment for THE RAPE OF AFRICA 53 permanent income; and this income consisted of goods for " sale which were in practice found more valuable than treasure for hoarding. To perfect this arrangement slaves and more slaves must be had. At the same time, the conscience of the world began to writhe. "Modern slavery was created by Christians, it was con- tinued by Christians, it was in some respects more barbarous than anything the world had yet seen, and its worst features were to be witnessed in countries that were most ostentatious in their parade of Christianity. It is this that provides the final and unanswerable indictment of the Christian Church." 8 There had been the splendor of the Catholic Church under Alexander VI and Leo X, and then the revolt led by Luther, the Reformation. Thus was the growing consciousness of the dignity of the human soul brought face to face with slavery and a new slave trade. Gradually it was rationalized widely as a method of rescuing the heathen from perdition and saving his soul. However, this rationalization meant nothing when it conflicted with the profits of trade; and planters particularly, stoutly refused to release converts, and innumerable Chris- tians often would not allow conversion. The profits of this new aspect of trade meant investment and the capitalist system. Investment called for labor, and cheap labor, if the profit was to be high; but labor was beginning to be conscious and to revolt. This was the meaning of the Peasant War in Germany in the sixteenth century. But there was revolt and revolution- ary thought not only in Europe; indeed it may be insisted that the revolt of labor against its modern degradation began in America rather than in Europe. This was the meaning of five slave revolts among the blacks in America and the beginning of the fateful dynasty of Maroons, or free Negroes, hiding in organized rebellion in the mountains of Cuba, Jamaica, and Haiti, in Mexico and Brazil. In the seventeenth century, with the increased importation of slaves, there were nine revolts, tIbid., p. '44 54 THE WORLD AND AFRICA leading to pitched war in Jamaica and Barbados and Haiti and to the independent state of Palmares in Brazil. Nevertheless, England had the bit in her teeth. "Royal ad- venturers trading to Africa" in 1667 had among them members of the royal family, three dukes, eight earls, seven lords, and twenty-seven knights. With the end of the civil war in Eng- land, British merchants crowded upon the landholding aris- tocracy for an increased share in the profits of industry. While the British were fighting ostensibly for dynastic disputes in Europe, they were really, in the War of Spanish Succession and in the Seven Years' War, fighting for profit through world trade and especially the slave trade. In 1713 they gained, by the coveted Treaty of Asiento, the right to monopolize the slave trade from Africa to the Spanish colonies. In that cen- tury they beat Holland to her knees and started her economic decline. They overthrew the Portuguese in India, and finally, by the middle of the century, overcame their last rival in India, the French. In the eighteenth century they raised the slave trade to the greatest single body of trade on earth. The Royal African Company transported an average of five thousand slaves a year between 1680 and 1686; but the newly rich middle-class merchants were clamoring for free trade in human flesh. Eventually the Royal African Company was powerless against the competition of free merchant traders, and a new organization was established in 1750 called the "Company of Merchants trading to Africa." In the first nine years of this "free trade," Bristol alone shipped 160,950 Negroes to the sugar plantations. In 1760, 146 ships sailed from British ports to Africa with a capacity of 36,000 slaves. In 1771 there were 190 ships and 47,000·slaves. The British colonies between 1680 and 1786 imported over two million slaves. By the middle of the eighteenth century Bristol owned 237 slave trade vessels, London, 147, and Liverpool, 89. Liverpool's first slave vessel sailed for Africa in 1709. In 1730 it had 15 ships in the trade and in 1771, 105. The slave THE RAPE OF AFRICA 55 trade brought Liverpool in the late eighteenth century a clear profit of £300,000 a year. A fortunate slave trade voyage made a profit of £8,000, and even a poor cargo would make £5,000. It was not uncommon in Liverpool and Bristol for the slave traders to make 100 per cent profit. The proportion of slave ships to the total shipping of England was one in one hundred in 1709 and one-third in 1771. The slave traders were strong in both the House of Lords and the House of Commons, and a British coin, the guinea, originated in the African trade of the eighteenth century. In the midst of this, a tremendous treasure from India poured into England. The Battle of Plassey gave India to the British Empire for plunder on a scale seldom seen before or since. The enormous extent of robbery of the Indians by British civil servants has been abundantly proved. Howitt referred to "the scenes and transactions in our great Indian empire-that splendid empire which has poured out such floods of wealth into this country; in which such princely presents of diamonds and gold have been heaped on our adventurers; from the glean- ings of which so many happy families in England 'live at home at ease' and in the enjoyment of every earthly luxury and re- finement. For every palace built by returned Indian nabobs in England; for every investment by fortunate adventurers in India stock; for every cup of wine and delicious viand tasted by the families of Indian growth amongst us, how many of these Indians themselves are now picking berries in the wild jungles, sweltering at the thankless plough only to suffer fresh extortions, or snatching with the bony fingers of famine, the bloated grains from the manure of the high-ways of their native country!" 4 The directors of the East India Company themselves ad- mitted: "We have the strongest sense of the deplorable state to which our affairs were on the point of being reduced, from the corruption and rapacity of our servants, and the universal 4 Howitt, op. cit., pp. 309-310. THE WORLD AND AFRICA depravity of manners throughout the settlement. The general relaxation of all discipline and obedience, both military and civil, was hastily tending to a dissolution of all government. Our letter to the Select Committee expresses our sentiments of what has been obtained by way of donations; and to that we must add, that we think the vast fortunes acquired in the inland trade have been obtained by a scene of the most ty- rannic and oppressive conduct that was ever known in any age or country!" 5 However this wealth was obtained and however pious the re- gret at the methods of its rape, there can be no doubt as to what became of it. Its owners in the main were not royal spendthrifts, nor aristocratic dilettantes; and even if some were, their finan- cial advisers put their funds largely into the safe investment of West Indian slavery and the African slave trade. Thus an enormous amount of free capital seeking safe investment and permanent income poured into the banks, companies, and new corporations. The powerful British institution of the stock exchange was born. It was Karl Marx who made the great unanswerable charge of the sources of capitalism in African slavery: "The discovery of gold and silver in America, the extirpation, enslavement, and entombment in mines of the aboriginal population, the beginning of the conquest and looting of the East Indies, the turning of Africa into a warren for the commercial hunting of black-skins, signalized the rosy dawn of the era of capitalist production. These idyllic proceedings are the chief momenta of primitive accumulation. On their heels treads the com- mercial war of the European nations, with the globe for a theatre. It begins with the revolt of the Netherlands from Spain, assumes giant dimensions in England's anti-Jacobin war, and is still going on in the opium wars against China .... " 6 5 Ibid., p. 262. 6 Karl Marx, Capital, tr. by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling (Chicago: C. H. Kerr & Co.• 1909). Vol. I. P: 823. THE RAPE OF AFRICA 57 "With the development of capitalist production during the manufacturing period, the public opinion of Europe had lost the last remnant of shame and conscience. The nations bragged cynically of every infamy that served them as a means of capital- istic accumulation. Read, e.g., the naive Annals of Commerce of the worthy A. Anderson. Here it is trumpeted forth as a triumph of English statecraft that at the peace of Utrecht, England extorted from the Spaniards by the Asiento Treaty the privilege of being allowed to ply the Negro trade, until then only carried on between Africa and the English West Indies, between Africa and Spanish America as well. England thereby acquired the right of supplying Spanish America until 1743 with four thousand eight hundred Negroes yearly. This threw, at the same time, an official cloak over British smuggling. Liverpool waxed fat on the slave trade. This was its method of primitive accumulation. And, even to the present day, Liverpool 'respectability' is the Pindar of the slave trade which ... 'has coincided with that spirit of bold adventure which has characterised the trade of Liverpool and rapidly carried it to its present state of prosperity; has occasioned vast em- ployment for shipping and sailors, and greatly augmented the demand for the manufactures of the country.' Liverpool em- ployed in the slave trade, in 1730,15 ships; in 1751, 53; in 1760, 74; in 1770,96; and in 1792, 132." 7 "T'antae malis erat, to establish the 'eternal laws of Nature' of the capitalist mode of production, to complete the process of separation between labourers and conditions of labour, to transform at one pole the social means of production and sub- sistence into capital, at the opposite pole, the mass of the population into wage-labourers, into 'free labouring poor,' that artificial product of modern society. If money, according to Augier, 'comes into the world with a congenital blood-stain on one cheek,' capital comes dripping from head to foot, from every pore, with blood and dirt." 8 7 lbid., Vol. r,pp. 832-33. Marx quotes the work of Aiken (1795),p. 339. s Ibid., Vol. I, pp. 833-34. THE WORLD AND AFRICA The method by which slavery and capital investment were developed by Great Britain can be clearly followed: the "tri- angular trade" flourished. It depended first mainly upon sugar and tobacco and later on cotton. The processing of these ma- terials turned England into a manufacturing country, and the focusing of the attention of technicians upon methods of manu- facture brought an astonishing series of inventions in the latter part of the eighteenth century. The Negroes were purchased with British manufactures and transported to the plantations. There they produced sugar, cotton, indigo, tobacco, and other products. The processing of these created new industries in England; while the needs of the Negroes and their owners provided a wider market for British industry, New England agriculture, and the Newfoundland fisheries. By 1750 there was hardly a manufacturing town in England which was not connected with the colonial trade. The profits provided one of the main streams of that capital which financed the Industrial Revolution. The West Indian islands became the center of the British Empire and of immense importance to the grandeur of England. It was the Negro slaves who made these sugar colonies the most precious colonies ever recorded in the annals of imperialism. Experts called them "the funda- mental prop and support" of the Empire. The British Empire was regarded as a "magnificent superstructure of American commerce and naval power on an African foundation." 9 William Wood said that the slave trade was the "spring and parent whence the others flow." Postlethwayt described the slave trade as "the first principle and foundation of all the rest, the mainspring of the machine which sets every wheel in mo- tion." 10 The triangular trade made an enormous contribution to Britain's industrial development. The profits fertilized the productive system of the country. The slate industry in Wales 9 Eric Williams, Capitalism and Slavery (Chapel Hill, N,C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1944),p. 52. 10 Ibid., p. 51. THE RAPE OF AFRICA 59 was revolutionized by a plantation owner. The British West Indies interest was back of the vast railway development. Cot- ton responded to new inventions. Between 1709 and 1787 the tonnage of British shipping in foreign trade increased four- fold. The British nobility benefited largely from the West Indian trade. The Lascelles were from Barbados, and one of their descendants is now brother-in-law of the King of Eng- land. The Earl of Chatham considered the sugar colonies as "the landed interest of this kingdom." West Indian investors bought seats in Parliament. The poetry of both Browning and Barrett with all its depth and beauty grew straight out of ,,yest Indian slavery. While a profit of seven shillings per head per annum was sufficient to enrich a country, it was declared that each white man in the colonies brought a profit of over seven pounds. Sir Dalby Thomas declared that every person employed on the sugar plantation was a hundred and thirty times more valuable to England than one at home. Professor Pitman has estimated that in 1775British West Indies plantations represented a valua- tion of fifty million pounds sterling, and the sugar planters themselves put the figure at seventy millions in 1788. In 1798 Pitt assessed the annual income from West Indian plantations at four million pounds as compared with one million from the rest of the world. As Adam Smith wrote in Wealth of Nations: "The profits of a sugar plantation in any of our West Indian colonies are generally much greater than those of any other cul- tivation that is known either in Europe or America." According to Davenant.v- "Britain's total trade at the end of the seven- teenth century brought a profit of £2,000,000. The plantation trade accounted for £600,000; re-export of plantation goods, £120,000; European, African, and Levant trade, £600,000; East India trade £500,000; re-export of East India goods, £180,000." 12 11Davenant was the author of Discourses on the Publick Revenues, pub· lished in London in 16g8. 12 Eric Williams, op. cit., p. 53. 60 THE WORLD AND AFRICA The Napoleonic wars widened the trade empire of Great Britain and extended the market for her manufactures. After twenty-two years of fighting, British merchants surpassed in wealth the landed aristocracy, and the Reform Bill of 1832 reflected this economic fact. We may pause here to enumerate a series of events which have been too often looked upon as separate and unconnected. They are as follows: 1500-1600: The revolt of slaves in the West Indies 1655-1738: War between the British and the Maroons 1750: British free trade in human flesh 1757: The loot of India begins 1774: American association against the slave trade 1775: The American Revolution 1789: The French Revolution 1791-1798: Revolt of Toussaint L'Ouverture 1792-1815: Reaction in France and the rise and fall of Na- poleon 1800-1900: Capitalism and the factory system in England 1807: Abolition of the British slave trade 1830: The Cotton Kingdom 1833-1838: British abolition of slavery 1846: Repeal of the British Corn Laws; free trade 1863: Emancipation in America 1884: Imperial colonialism. The slave revolts were the beginnings of the revolutionary struggle for the uplift of the laboring masses in the modern world. They have been minimized in extent because of the .propaganda in favor of slavery and the feeling that the knowl- edge of slave revolt would hurt the system. In the eighteenth century there were fifteen such revolts: in Portuguese and Dutch South Africa, in the French colonies, in the British possessions, in Cuba and little islands like St. Lucia. There were pitched THE RAPE OF AFRICA 61 battles and treaties between the British and the black Maroons and finally there was a rebellion in Haiti which changed the face of the world and drove England out of the slave trade. A list of these revolts follows: 1522: Revolt in San Domingo 1530: Revolt in Mexico 1550: Revolt in Peru 1550: Appearance of the Maroons 1560: Byano Revolt in Central America 1600: Revolt of Maroons 1655: Revolt of 1500 Maroons in Jamaica 1663: Land given Jamaican Maroons 1664-1738: Maroons fight British in Jamaica 1674: Revolt in Barbados 1679: Revolt in Haiti 1679-1782: Maroons in Haiti organized 1691: Revolt in Haiti 1692: Revolt in Barbados 1695: Palmares; revolt in Brazil 17°2: Revolt in Barbados 1711: Negroes fight French in Brazil 1715-1763: Revolts in Surinam 1718: Revolt in Haiti 1719: Revolt in Brazil 1738: Treaty with Maroons 1763: Black Caribs revolt 1779: Haitians help the United States Revolution 1780: French Treaty with Maroons 1791: Dominican revolt 1791-18°3: Haitian Revolution • 1794: Cuban revolt 1794: Dominican revolt 1795: Maroons rebel 1796: St. Lucia revolt 1816: Barbados revolt THE WORLD AND AFRICA 1828-1837: Revolts in Brazil 1840-1845: Haiti helps Bolivar 1844: Cuban revolt 1844-1893: Dominican revolt 1861: Revolt in Jamaica 1895: War in Cuba These revolts show that the docility of Negro slaves in America is a myth. They fall into two groups: those before the French Revolution and those after. The revolt of Maroons in Jamaica and Cuba and the Bush Negroes in South America and the repeated attempts in Haiti frightened the slaveholders and threatened the stability of the whole system. In Jamaica the Maroons "continued to distress the island for upwards of forty years, during which time forty-four acts of assembly were passed, and at least £240,000 expended for their suppression." 13 The governor of Barbados wrote: "The public mind is ever tremblingly aware to the dangers of insurrection," and the statute books all over the slave territory testified to this fact. The next event that opposed the slave trade and slavery was the American Revolution. Not only did the colonists achieve their independence through the help of slaves and the promise of their freedom, and with the co-operation in money and men from Haiti, but they represented actual working classes rather than exploiters of labor. Finally, the French Revolution burst forth as a war against privilege based on birth and demanded freedom, especially economic freedom to trade and to enter industry without coercion. The result was that the slave trade met distinct opposition based on humanitarian grounds; but this opposition would '!:tave been powerless to stop the trade if it had not been evi- dent that the trade itself as a source of profit was threatened. The revolt of America confirmed the superiority of the French 13 Bryan Edwards, The History, Civil and Commercial, of the British Colonies in the West Indies (Philadelphia: James Humphreys, 1805),Vol. I, P·34°. THE RAPE OF AFRICA sugar colonies. Between 1783 and 1789 the progress of San Domingo had been amazing. At the end of the eighteenth century the British sugar planters lost their supremacy to the French colonies. French colonial exports amounted to eight millions pounds while British colonial exports amounted to five million pounds. When the American colonies won their independence, the Caribbean ceased to be a British sea and investments began to be transferred from the West to the East Indies. In 1783 Prime Minister William Pitt showed increased interest in India and encouraged Wilberforce to propose the abolition of the slave trade. Then came the French Revolution and eventually the re- volt of Haiti. The British made every effort to seize control of this famous French sugar colony. They tried both force of arms and bribery, but at last were compelled to recognize the independence of Toussaint L'Ouverture, whom they tried to divorce from allegiance to the French. Nevertheless, with Haiti out of the world market, the British could have retained their hold upon the sugar industry had it not been for the continued cultivation of sugar in Spanish and Portuguese colonies. So long as these colonies could obtain cheap slaves, they threatened and even destroyed the invest- ment in slave labor already made by British capital. Looked upon as machines or "real estate," as slaves legally were, the investment in Negro labor was being undermined so long as cheaper Negro labor could be had from Africa. To keep the prices of slaves from falling, the slave trade had to be limited or stopped. Otherwise the whole slavery in- vestment would totter, and that is what England faced after the revolution of Toussaint. Early in the nineteenth century, therefore, she began to change, and back of philanthropists like Sharpe and Wilberforce came the unexpected support of opportunist politicians like Pitt. Moreover, capitalism was far enough developed to produce THE WORLD AND AFRICA sufficient free finance capital to effect a transfer of investment from one field to another without such losses as would cripple the system. Losses there had to be, but they were part of the anarchy of business methods, which by large-scale gambling and periodic crises rushed blindly to newer and larger fields of profit. Eventually Negro slavery and the slave trade were abandoned in favor of colonial imperialism, and the England which in the eighteenth century established modern slavery in America on a vast scale, appeared in the nineteenth century as the official emancipator of slaves and founder of a method of control of human labor and material which proved more profitable than slavery. For a long time the fiction of the slave trade as a method of conversion to Christianity had ceased to salve the conscience of honest-thinking men. Slavery and the slave trade were pour- ing such treasure into England, building her cities, railways, and manufactures, and making her so powerful a country that the defense of the system was fierce. England became mistress of the seas. The empire sang "Hail Britannia, Britannia Rules the Waves." Before the American Revolution, English public opinion accepted the view of the slavetrader: "Tho' to traffic in human creatures, may at first sight appear barbarous, inhuman, and unnatural; yet the traders herein have as much to plead in their own excuse, as can be said for some other branches of trade . . . . In a word, from this trade proceed benefits, far outweigh- ing all, either real or pretended mischiefs and inconven- iences." 14 The cruelty and inhumanity of the slave trade was a horrible fact. A committee of the House of Commons described the "Middle Passage": "The Negroes were chained to each other hand and foot, and stowed so close that they were not allowed above a foot and a half for each in breadth. Thus rammed to- gether like herrings in a barrel, they contracted putrid and 14 Eric Williams, op. cit., p. 50. THE RAPE OF AFRICA fatal disorders; so that they who came to inspect them in a morning had occasionally to pick dead slaves out of their rows, and to unchain their carcasses from the bodies of their wretched fellow-sufferers to whom they had been fastened." 15 "During the hearing of a case for insurance, the following facts were brought out. A slave-ship, with four hundred and forty-two slaves, was bound from Guinea to Jamaica. Sixty of the slaves died from overcrowding. The captain, being short of water, threw ninety-six more overboard. Afterwards, twenty- six more were drowned. Ten drowned themselves in despair. Yet the ship reached port before the water was exhausted." 16 The revolt against the Protestants began to appear among the Methodists, Baptists, and Quakers. Methodism condoned slav- ery but was sensitive to and alarmed over the slave trade. The Baptists," beginning in England in 1600, developed into an extremely democratic organization which appealed to workers and even to slaves; and the general philosophical and economic enlightenment of the eighteenth century brought men of learning and artists into a distinct anti-slavery movement. The slave trade was abolished by England in 1807, and Eng- land undertook to make the rest of the world outlaw it too. The United States, Portugal, and Spain gave only lip service to this program, ami the slave trade continued up to the middle of the nineteenth century although. to a lessening extent. With the stopping of the slave trade it was evident that investment in labor was different from investment in land, material, and machines; that labor, no matter how much it was degraded, had initiative and made demands. Revolt of the working classes, following the incentive of Haiti, spread. The spectacular and astonishing triumph of revolution in Haiti threatened the whole slave system of the West Indies and even of continental America. It was this revolt more than any other single thing that spelled doom not only of the African slave 15 Ingram, History of Slavery and Serfdom (London, 1895), p. 152. 16 Goldwin Smith, The United Kingdom: A Political History, Vol. II, p. 247· 66 THE WORLD AND AFRICA trade but of slavery in America as a basis of an industrial system. The revolt encouraged the abolition movement in the United States and in Brazil; it flamed in practically every island of the West Indies. Unless the slave worker could be pacified, income based on slave labor would be destroyed. The result was that in 1833 England abolished slavery. Similar abolition followed in the United States after civil war. The Napoleonic wars did not ruin England; together with the African slave trade, Negro slavery, and the loot of India, they made the British government the most powerful in the world; they ruined England's industrial rivals; they left her in control of the chief sources of raw materials by colonial owner- ship and with the ready cash to outbid rivals; her vast store of finance capital enabled her to manufacture machinery and wait a generation for repayment; British knowledge of science and technique enabled the country to make the best machines and tools and render the whole world creditor for their purchase; Britain ruled the seas and thus monopolized transport. Even when in the earlier mad rush for profit on the new capitalism, she reduced her own labor to slavery in the factory system and faced revolution, she proved the only land able to raise wages and yet maintain high profit by shifting the burden of pauper- ized toil to the colonies and dominated peoples; and at the same time, although author and chief supporter of modern slavery, Great Britain could hold up her head and, by suppressing a slavery now becoming unprofitable, lead world philanthropy as the great emancipator of the slave. But even as this role rejoiced her greater souls, the British Empire became the victim of the worst legacy of Negro slavery: the doctrine of race superiority and the color line, which in a later century made civilized man commit suicide in a mad attempt to hold the vast majority of the earth's peoples in thrall to the white race-a goal to which they still cling today, hidden away behind nationalism and power politics. This was not a rake's progress of malevolence; it was a bitter THE RAPE OF AFRICA struggle between Good and Evil-between fine and noble souls and conscienceless desire for luxury, power, and indulgence. The forces of Evil were continually reinforced by the vast power which slavery and the exploitation of men put into the hands of the betrayers of labor, making them the envied of the earth, until nations became willing to destroy the earth in order to gain it. Suppose that at any point in this Descent to Hell, Right had received help and reinforcement? Suppose that a free America had welcomed a free Haiti into a world that insisted on freedom for Africa and Asia? But no; slavery dominated the "free" republic of the west for half a century, with the slave cotton kingdom as foundation stone for British manufactures, while Great Britain seized land and labor in all the dark world. Suppose that England had freed and edu- cated Africa, emancipated India, and joined hands with Japan to uplift China, instead of making ignorance compulsory for the majority of men even in England, in order to build up the most "comfortable" and envied aristocracy on earth? Suppose the technique and science of the nineteenth century had been used to raise the many instead of to enrich the few? A dream? Perhaps, but even an unrealized dream would be better than the present nightmare. The new era of capitalism dawned, springing from Cal- vinism: thrift, industry, honesty as the best policy, along with interest and profit. Capitalism passed into high capitalism at different periods in different nations: In England in 1846, when English capitalism needed no protective tariff, it smashed the agriculturists in Parliament and forced the adoption of free trade; in the United States invested capital passed the value of the land about 1850. The Revolution of 1848 in France revealed the power of organized labor as well as the power of capitalism, which later triumphed. In Germany capitalism began its full sway after World War 1. In the British Parliament, after the passage of the Reform Bill in 1832, capitalism was paramount. The plantation trade 68 THE WORLD AND AFRICA had formerly meant everything; but in the new capitalist sys- tem, plantation slavery had little place. Britain's mechanized 'might was still, however, making the whole world her footstool. She was clothing the world, exporting men and machines, and had become the world's banker. British capital, like British production, was thinking in world terms. "Between 1815 and 1830 at least fifty million pounds had been invested more or less permanently in the securities of the most stable European governments, more than twenty million had been invested in one form or another in Latin America, and five or six millions had very quietly found their way to the United States." 17 But no new capital went to the West Indies. This then was the history of the slave trade, of that extraordi- nary movement which made investment in human flesh the first experiment in organized modern capitalism; which indeed made capitalism possible. It accompanied the beginnings of democracy in the modern world, but that beginning was hindered and almost stopped by the result which black slavery had on Africa itself. In Africa a new and supplementary means of control, devel- oped by means of the Arab trade in ivory, led to exploration and eventual annexation under the pretense of attacking slav- ery. In this whole story of the so-called "Arab slave trade" the truth has been strangely twisted. Arab slave raiding was in the beginning, and largely to the end, a secondary result of the British and American slavery and slave trade and specifically was based on American demand for ivory. The Arabs had by the nineteenth century driven back the Portuguese opposite Zanzibar and had developed two profitable products of trade: ivory and slaves. Ivory has a long history. Homer repeatedly mentions it. Ivory has been found in the ruins of Nineveh and in the days of Tuthmosis III; cargoes of ivory and ebony in addition to 17 Leland Jenks, Migrations of British Capital to I875 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1927), p. 64. THE RAPE OF AFRICA 69 gold came down the Nile. In Kings and Chronicles we learn of the great throne of ivory which Solomon built and hear that once every three years ships came to Israel with gold and silver, ivory, apes, and peacocks. Ezekiel laments the ruin of Tyre with its boxwood benches inlaid with ivory. In Greece the statue by Phidias of Jupiter Olympus, one of the seven wonders of the world, was made of ivory, marble, and gold. The seats of the Roman senators were made of ivory, and large quantities of ivory poured into Rome from Africa. By the beginning of the Christian era the trade in ivory had decreased. The herds of elephants had disappeared, and there was no organized method of gathering the ivory or of bringing it to market. Moreover, it was not until the Renaissance, in the fifteenth century, that renewed demand made search for it profitable. The Portuguese, both on the West Coast of Africa and in Mozambique, began to export it. They were so prodigal that the considerable store which the natives had collected was almost exhausted by the middle of the seventeenth century. The Dutch began to collect ivory in South Africa, and there and in Central Africa a steady supply kept pace with the de- mand. By the middle of the nineteenth century, however, there came a new demand from the west. The ivory had long been carried by the slaves to the coast or down the Nile, and then instead of the bearers being returned, they were sold. Most of the ivory in the seventeenth, eighteenth, and the beginning of the nineteenth centuries went to Arabia, Persia, and India, and the slaves to the same parts of the world as soldiers and servants. The trade was small, and while the slave trade was a disrupting influence it did not transfer any large number of persons. Ivory from about 1840 became increasingly valuable. Its gathering called for fire-arms and transport. Europe and Amer- ica furnished the arms in vast quantity. Negro porters bore the white gold over vast distances on their heads, and the traders doubled their profit by selling these Negroes into slavery in the THE WORLD AND AFRICA Middle East and America. The result was an industry with huge profits, which called to service the most vicious elements of the Nile Valley with its social disintegration of centuries, aided by the efforts of Mohammed Ali, the ally of white colo- nial aggression. It also called white soldiers of fortune like Selous and Lugard, who slaughtered the herds of half-human elephants in cold blood. It called the explorers who followed the hunters and slave traders. After the explorers came the missionaries. Both pointed out that the ivory-slave business was killing the goose that might lay even more golden eggs, if instead of killing valu- able labor, this labor and materials were subject to political control of Europe and the abundant capital seeking investment. The missionaries like Livingstone saw in this not only a means of saving bodies and souls of human beings, but also thrift and good business, which in the folklore of early capitalism were the inevitable elements divinely conjoined for modern civiliza tion. The rising demand in England and America for the suppres- sion of the slave trade in East Africa was not pure philanthropy. It was that "philanthropy and 5 per cent" which was the transition from the century of human slavery in America to the century of the transfer of capital from sugar plantations to colonial imperialism in Africa and Asia. The main end of both enterprises was profit to the owner and exploiter, mainly at the expense of poverty, ignorance, and pain for the slave and native subject. About the middle third of the nineteenth century the situa- tion changed abruptly. The demand for ivory increased. In America, ivory working was an early industry, especially in New England on the banks of the Connecticut, where ivory has been cut since 1820. It was processed for carving, for cutlery, billiard balls, and miniatures, and for piano keys. At Deep River and Ivoryton and Buffalo the keyboards for all the pianos in America, Canada, and Australia were made. Because of THE RAPE OF AFRICA increased demand, European and American traders set up establishments for buying ivory in Zanzibar; in the thirties and forties prices increased. Arabs began to ask for arms in order to shoot elephants and coerce the natives. Increased ex- ports of ivory to Europe and America and of slaves to Arabia and the Persian Gulf, called for increased imports of weapons and ammunition. The Germans sent thirteen thousand mus- kets in one year. The British and Portuguese sent thousands of the old Sepoy guns from India. The French supplied a single- barrel light weapon. American blasting powder came in ten- and twenty-five-pound kegs. German cavalry sabers came and cases of percussion caps. Arabs borrowed from Indian usurers at 60 to 80 per cent, and set out for the haunts of elephants.w Curiously enough it was this ivory trade that stimulated and guided travel and discovery in Central Africa. Explorers fol- lowed the ivory traders, who were the true discoverers. Burton, Speke, Livingstone, Stanley, and Cameron started from the Arab capital of Zanzibar. They followed the lines of traffic set by the Arab ivory traders. Petherick, the British ivory trader, preceded Schweinfurth, and the countries he explored were opened up by the ivory trade. Livingstone found the ivory traders on the Upper Congo. Cameron left Zanzibar in 1873 and was the first European to cross Africa from east to west along the ivory traders' routes. Stanley made his second expe- dition, 1874-1877, and was helped by Tippoo-Tib, the great Negro slave trader who had also helped Livingstone. The last of the great expeditions was Stanley's, in 1887-1889, when he rescued Emin Pasha and his Negro wife. It was in this way that knowledge of the technique of the slave trade and its meaning came to Europe at a time when the slave trade from Africa to America had been largely sup- pressed. We had a series of first-hand descriptions of this trade. Ivory became in the last half of the nineteenth century the 18 E. D. Moore, Ivory: Scourge of Africa (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1931), p. 54. THE WORLD AND AFRICA scourge of Central Africa. The complete story of bloodshed and cruelty will never be known. Thousands of miles of fertile country were turned into wilderness and ruin. Hundreds of thousands of elephants were slain and thousands of human beings. It has been estimated that not more than one in five of the captives bearing the ivory ever reached the ocean. Starved and weakened by disease and the strain of marching, they lined the long paths with their dead. "Picture, if you can, a territory nearly as large as the whole of our United States east of the Mississippi River and Illinois, terrorized and overrun in all directions with hundreds of rov- ing bands of plundering murderers armed with invincible weapons of oppression, a land of blood and might, the nights filled with flame and destruction, the days weary with the marching of the coffles and the blood of the despairing, hopeless slaves. And this for years, for decades." 19 Henry M. Stanley wrote: "Every tusk, piece, and scrap in the possession of an Arab trader has been steeped and dyed in blood. Every pound weight has cost the life of a man, woman, or child, for every five pounds a hut has been burned, for every two tusks a whole village has been destroyed, every twenty tusks have been obtained at the price of a district with all its people, villages, and plantations. It is simply incredible that, because ivory is required ... populations, tribes, and nations should be utterly destroyed." 20 Hamed bin Muhammed, a Negro, better known as T'ippoo- 'Tib, was one of the greatest of slave traders. He eventually became sultan and overlord of the country of Kassongo in the very middle of Central Africa, which he made a center of ivory collecting and slave hunting. He had a thousand muzzle-loading guns. And it was not until 1905 that he died. The credit for suppressing the slave-ivory trade must go to Livingstone who inspired it, to Kirk of East Africa who helped 19 Ibid., p. 63. 20 Henry M. Stanley, In Darkest Africa (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1891),Vol. I, p. 240. THE RAPE OF AFRICA 73 carry it through, and to Bargarsh, the Negroid Arab, who actually suppressed the Zanzibar trade. But these three men represent the curious interests involved: Livingstone was a humanitarian who thought that trade and commerce was the best and natural way to improve the condition of man. He would be horrified to see South Africa and Rhodesia today and realize the plight into which the natives have been forced by European trade and industrialism. Kirk was a British im- perialist who foresaw the colonial era. He was no philanthropist desirous of the development and rise of the blacks. What he wanted was to expand the power of England, and he believed that could be done best by suppressing the slave trade and slave labor under the Arabs and increasing colonial ownership and serf labor under Great Britain. The Arab sultan Bargarsh was persuaded that colonial alliance with Great Britain would protect his future power and income. The effect upon Europe was curious. European and Ameri- can commerce was stimulated. The missionaries, still believing in the expanding trade of the eighteenth century, coupled commerce with missionary effort and did not see the inherent contradiction between them. The result was that the missionary and the merchant worked side by side and hand in hand. It was Livingstone who declared that he was bringing commerce and missionary effort to the natives. Commercial companies, like the African Lakes Company, exploited and administered territories and equipped the ele- phant hunters. They supplied the rifles and sent the hunters, reserving the right to buy the ivory at a set price. It was thus that Sir Alfred Sharp and Lord Lugard began life as profes- sional ivory hunters. The coming of American, British, French, German and Portuguese traders in the middle of the nineteenth century furnished the artillery for the worst period in this ivory-slave trade under the Arabs. At its height thirty thousand slaves were exported annually through Zanzibar, leaving more than a hundred thousand who had died on the way to the sea. 74 THE WORLD AND AFRICA Then that extraordinary transformation took place in Brit- ish public policy. The stopping of the expansion of the Arab slave trade in East and Central Africa became a means of building up the British Empire. All that Britain had done in establishing the new modern slavery in America was forgotten in her effort to suppress the ivory-slave trade in Africa, and that effort was only the other side of her building up of a great African colonial territory which she proposed to exploit by the use of cheap native labor, the sale of African raw materials, and the opening of markets for her merchandise. Slavery and the slave trade became transformed into anti-slavery and colo- nialism, and all with the same determination and demand to increase the profit of investment. It all became a characteristic drama of capitalistic exploita- tion, where the right hand knew nothing of what the left hand did, yet rhymed its grip with uncanny timeliness; where the investor neither knew, nor inquired, nor greatly cared about the sources of his profits; where the enslaved or dead or half-paid worker never saw nor dreamed of the value of his work (now owned by others); where neither the society darling nor the great artist saw blood on the piano keys; where the clubman, boasting of great game hunting, heard above the click of his smooth, lovely, resilient billiard balls no echo of the wild shrieks of pain from kindly, half-human beasts as fifty to seventy-five thousand each year were slaughtered in cold, cruel, lingering horror of living death; sending their teeth to adorn civilization on the bowed heads and chained feet of thirty thousand black slaves, leaving behind more than a hundred thousand corpses in broken, flaming homes. Quite naturally all this ivory trade centered in London. In Mincing Lane the ivory of the world was bought and sold from the time of the eighteen twenties, when the slave cotton king- dom began to pour profit from American plantations into New York and Manchester. The annual imports of ivory into Lon- don rose as follows THE RAPE OF AFRICA 75 1788-1798: 100 tons a year 1827: 60 tons 1845-1849: 294 tons 1870-1874: 627 tons 1880-1884: 514 tons This meant the death of seventy-five thousand elephants a year in the heyday of the trade. An enthusiastic elephant hunter Idescribed the death of one elephant. They had killed her child. "She turned with a shriek of rage and made a furious charge. She charged three or four times. She often stood still and covered with blood faced the men as she received fresh wounds. At last with a short struggle she staggered around and sank down kneeling and dead." Far away over miles and years, on lovely keys chipped from her curving tusks, men played the Moonlight Sonata. Neither for the keys nor the music was the death of the elephant actually necessary. It was this London market that supplied raw material to be made into billiard balls and piano keys and lovely little ornaments to Ivoryton, Connecticut, and also contrived through the veiled, devious ways of high finance banking to supply Arab and Negro slave raiders with powder and guns and to buy their ivory at prices which were fabulous to them. Behind the slave raiders came the explorers, who pointed out the vast resources of Africa and the possibilities of African labor; behind the explorers came the missionaries, who cried out bitterly against slavery but said nothing and knew less of the white sources of their power in London and Buffalo. Gradually the picture changed: the captains of industry saw new opportunity for capital. They could wrench the profits of ivory from the Arabs and Negroes; they could wheel England and world religion back of imperial seizure of Africa from the Cape of Good Hope to Cairo, with not only petty profit from ivory, but vaster profits from spices, gold, diamonds, and cop- per; they could replace wasteful slavery with local black labor paid at wages from one-half to nine-tenths cheaper than white THE WORLD AND AFRICA labor in Europe and America and make white labor like it because all this could be done to the glory of God and the superiority of the white race. And it was done. So colonial imperialism was born. And so some of its leaders illustrated in their own individual lives its development; there was Frederick C. Selous, who began as an elephant hunter and then annexed the peoples and minerals of Mashonaland to the British Empire; there was Frederick D. Lugard, who first fought in India, Burma, and the Sudan; then as a big game hunter in East Africa, where, armed by the African Lakes Company, he murdered elephants in great numbers and became a part of the ivory-slave trade complex. Next he appeared in East Africa as a free-lance fighter against Arabs and Mohammedans and in defense of Christian missions; he reappeared as agent of the British East Africa Company and annexed Uganda to Britain. Thereupon he was recognized as a great champion of imperial England and went to West Africa to help subdue the falling remnants of Sudanese culture. Here he shrewdly realized that conquest of these peoples. could most easily be accomplished if their tribal government were left undisturbed, while Britain controlled trade and foreign relations. Having thus invented "indirect rule," he became a British governor in West Africa. Eventually he retired, lived in England on a pension paid by black West Africa, was regarded as the greatest authority on Africa, and died in honor as a noble British lord. What effect did all this have upon the dark natives of Africa? In the past we have dwelt upon physical suffering, the loss of life, and the devastation of the land, but we have not thought of the larger and deeper social disintegration. First of all, not only was the way opened from the Sahara to the Cape of Good Hope for marauding masses of Bantu warriors, but this great and long-continued movement became organized for aggression and conquest. We hear of the fierce onslaughts of wild tribes like the Yaggas, but we must also remember that there came a new sort of organization. Negro life could not settle down for THE RAPE OF AFRICA 77 political organization and empire building. It could not wait for the development of herdsmen and agriculture. It must hurry on to safer places and sheltered land and loot. "It was sorrowfully recognized that the degradation of the Negro peoples of the nearer African interior was the direct result of European slave-dealing. The savagery of Dahomey and Benin was the survival of the ferocity by which native chiefs, a century earlier, had supplied the demands of English and Dutch traders for victims for the plantations." 21 This movement culminated in the magnificent and. utterly ruthless army of a Chaka in the nineteenth century, which almost successfully battled machine guns with assagais. Then too on the West Coast came transformation: the city-states with their intricate social organization and carefully planned industry and beautiful art were pushed back and overwhelmed by newer, stronger military states, like that of Dahomey in the seventeenth century; and the Ashanti earlier had never gained in the line of peaceful industry and art as much as the new gains which they made as intermediaries of the slave traders. The East African slave trade under Negroes like Tippoo-T'ib became organized. The commercial ends and profits sought by Europe were subtly introduced into and shared by an Africa that had been foreign to this kind of life. The mild domestic slavery of the African tribes and of the Arabs and Persians. which did not preclude the son of a slave becoming a king, a statesman, or a poet, was changed into chattel slavery with hard labor and cruel tasks. The continued development of African civilization, forecast in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries by that in the Sudan, was prevented and turned backward into chaos, flight, and death. Decadence could be seen on the West Coast, in the shadow of fabled Atlantis, where there emerged in curious juxtaposi- tion the blood sacrifice of the Benin juju together with the 21 William H. Woodward, A Short History of the British Empire (Lon- don: Cambridge University Press, 1924), p. 307. THE WORLD AND AFRICA beautiful bronzes of the Benin sculptors. The great kingdoms and empires of the Sudan which fell at the battle of Tenkadibou not only suffered the incubus of a horde of Berber invaders as they moved east and became the Sudanese kingdoms of Kanem and Bornu and the realm of the Fung; they approached the valley of the Nile and came into fierce combat with some of the worst manifestations of Mohammedanism. Pushing farther south, the Bantu herdsmen threw them- selves upon the Congo and Zimbabwe. There came to Africa an end of industry, especially industry guided by taste and art. Cheap European goods pushed in and threw the native products out of competition. Rum and gin displaced the milder native drinks. The beautiful patterned cloth, brocades, and velvets disappeared before their cheap imitations in Man- chester calicos. Methods of work were lost and forgotten. With all this went the fall and disruption of the family, the deliberate attack upon the ancient African clan by missionaries. The invading investors who wanted cheap labor at the gold mines, the diamond mines, the copper and tin mines, the oil forests and cocoa fields, followed the missionaries. The author- ity of the family was broken up; the authority and tradition of the clan disappeared; the power of the chief was transmuted into the rule of the white district commissioner. The old reli- gion was held up to ridicule, the old culture and ethical stand- ards were degraded or disappeared, and gradually all over Africa spread the inferiority complex, the fear of color, the worship of white skin, the imitation of white ways of doing and thinking, whether good, bad, or indifferent. By the end of the nineteenth century the degradation of Africa was as complete as organized human means could make it. Chieftains, representing a thousand years of striving human culture, were decked out in second-hand London top-hats, while Europe snickered. Frobenius says in his Civilisation Africaine: "When they (the first European navigators of the end of the Middle Ages] THE RAPE OF AFRICA 79 arrived in the Gulf of Guinea and landed at Vaida, the captains were astonished to find streets well cared for, bordered for several leagues in length by two rows of trees; for many days they passed through a country of magnificent fields, a country inhabited by men clad in brilliant costumes, the stuff of which they had woven themselves! More to the South in the kingdom of Congo, a swarming crowd dressed in silk and velvet; great states well ordered, and even to the smallest details, powerful sovereigns, rich industries-civilized to the marrow of their bones. And the condition of the countries on the eastern coast -Mozambique, for example-was quite the same. "What was revealed by the navigators of the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries furnishes an absolute proof that Negro Africa, which extended south of the desert zone of the Sahara, was in full efflorescence, in all the splendour of harmonious and well-formed civilizations, an efflorescence which the Euro- pean conquistadors annihilated as far as they progressed. For the new country of America needed slaves, and Africa had them to offer, hundreds, thousands, whole cargoes of slaves. However, the slave trade was never an affair which meant a perfectly easy conscience, and it exacted a justification; hence one made of the Negro a half-animal, an article of merchandise. And in the same way the notion of fetish (Portuguese feticeiro) was in- vented as a symbol of African religion. As for me, I have seen in no part of Africa the Negroes worship a fetish. The idea of the 'barbarous Negro' is a European invention which has consequently prevailed in Europe until the beginning of this century." 22 Who now were these Negroes on whom the world preyed for five hundred years? In defense of slavery and the slave 22 Leo Frobenius, Histoire de la Civilisation Ajricaine, tr. from the Ger- man by Back and Ermont (Paris: Gallimard, 1936), 6th ed., p. 56. This work has never been translated into English and is therefore quoted at length, since this greatest student of Africa is pow dead and German publ ications have ceased for the present. :80 THE WORLD AND AFRICA trade, and for the upbuilding of capitalistic industry and imperialistic colonialism, Africa and the Negro have been read .almost out of the bounds of humanity. They lost in modern thought their history and cultures. All that was human in Africa was deemed European or Asiatic. Africa was no integral part .of the world because the world which raped it had to pretend that it had not harmed a man but a thing. In view of the present world catastrophe, I want to recall the history of Africa. I want to retell its story so far as distorted -science has not concealed and lost it. I want to appeal to the past in order to explain the present. I know how unpopular this method is. What have we moderns, we wisest of the wise, to do with the dead past? Yet, "All that tread the globe, are but a handful to the tribes that slumber in its bosom," and who are we, stupid blunderers at the tasks these brothers sought to do-who are we to forget them? I remember once offering to an editor an article which began with a reference to the experience of last century. "Oh," he 'Said, "leave out the history and come to the present." I felt like going to him over a thousand miles and taking him by the lapels and saying, "Dear, dear jackass! Don't you understand that the past is the present; that without what was, nothing is? That, of the infinite dead, the living are but unimportant bits?" So now I ask you to turn with me back five thousand years and more and ask, what is Africa and who are Negroes? CHAPTER IV THE PEOPLING OF AFRICA This is the story based on science and scientific deductions from the facts as we know them con- cerning the physical development of African peoples. SEERS say that for full two thousand million years this worldout of fiery mist has whirled about the sun in molten metal and viscous crusted ball. That crust, congealing and separating the solids from the liquids, rose and fell in bulging ridges above the boiling sea. Five times the mass of land called Africa emerged and disappeared beneath the oceans. At last, at least a thousand million years ago, a mass of rigid rock lifted its crystal back above the waters and remained. Primeval Africa stretched from the ramparts of Ethiopia to where the copper, diamonds, and gold of South Africa eventually were found. More land arose, and perhaps three hundred million years ago Africa was connected with South America, India, and Australia. As the ocean basins dropped, the eastern half of Africa was slowly raised into a broad, flat arch. The eastern side of this arch gave way, forming the Indian Ocean, and when the roof of the arch fell in there appeared the great Rift valley. This enormous crack, extending six thousand miles from the Zambesi to Ethiopia and Syria, is 81 THE WORLD AND AFRICA said to be the only thing that Martians can descry as they look earthward of a starry night. All the great East African lakes lie in the main rift, and doubtless the Red Sea and the Sea of Galilee are also part of this vast phenomenon. Later, about ten million years ago, a second rift occurred, and rifting and tilting kept on until perhaps a hundred thousand years before our era. Recurrent change came in geography and climate. Europe and Africa were united by land and separated. Lower Egypt was submerged, and the Mediterranean extended to Persia. Finally, what the geologists call the modern world emerged. In Egypt great rivers poured down the hills between the Red Sea, and the Nile found old and new valleys. The Sahara was crossed by a network of rivers, pouring into a vaster Lake Chad and uniting the Niger, the Congo, and the Nile. Gondwanaland, the ancient united continent of Africa, South America, and Asia, was divided into three parts by the new changes which caused the rift valleys. The radioactivity of the inner earth made the crust break apart. We can see by the map how Africa broke from South America and Europe from North America. Changes in climate were caused by the sun, the earth's inner heat, and by two main glacial periods in Africa. The rainfall varied, bringing periods of flood be- tween the glaciers. The continent of Africa in its final modern form has been described as a question mark, as an inverted saucer, as the center of the world's continents. Including Madagascar, it is , three times the size of Europe, four times the size of the United States; and the whole of Europe, India, China, and the United States could be held within its borders. In actual measurement it is nearly square: five thousand miles long by four thousand six hundred miles wide. But its northern half is by far the larger, with the southern half tapering off. In the middle the equator cuts across Africa, and the whole continent lies mainly within the tropics. THE PEOPLING OF AFRICA Of the physical aspects of Africa, its relatively unbroken coastline has had the greatest effect upon its history. Although Africa is about three times larger than Europe in area, the coastline of Europe is four thousand miles longe~ than that of Africa. In other words, Africa has almost no peninsulas, deep bays, or natural harbors. Its low and narrow coast, almost level, rises rapidly to a central plateau with a depression in the center. Thus the great rivers fall suddenly to the ocean, and their navigation is impeded by rapids and falls. Its five areas include the original Great Plateau with an average elevation of over thirty-five hundred feet, where mountains crowned with snow rise from thirteen to twenty thousand feet. Over these open spaces have always roamed herds of wild animals-elephants, rhinoceroses, and buffaloes. The second area is the Great Depression, the basin of the Congo River draining nearly a million and a half square miles. Its average altitude is a thousand feet and it is the bed of a former inland sea. As Stanley described it: "Imagine the whole of France and the Iberian peninsula closely packed with trees varying from twenty to a hundred and eighty feet in height, whose crowns of foliage interlace and prevent any view of sky and sun, and each tree from a few inches to four feet in diam- eter." 1 In this area lies the Belgian Congo and French Equa- torial Africa, Liberia and the British West African colonies. The fourth area is the Sahara, extending from the Atlantic to the Red Sea. It covers three and a half million square miles and is divided into desert and fertile islands. In the past the Sahara was fertile and had a large population. Its surface today is often a hundred feet below sea level. In the east is Egypt and the Egyptian Sudan. North Africa lies on the Mediterranean with Algeria and Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. There are senses in which it is true that "Africa begins at the Pyrenees," and also that "Europe ends at the borders of the Sahara." We may distinguish in Africa equatorial and tropical eli- 1Stanley, op. cit., Vol. II, P: 76. THE WORLD AND AFRICA mates, and then over smaller areas climates peculiar to specific areas. The equatorial climate is divided into the climate of Central Africa and that of Guinea and East Africa. The first with constant heat, much rainfall, and humidity; the second with constant heat and smaller rainfall. In both these regions there is luxurious growth of plant life and dense forests. The East African climate is hot. There are savannahs and varied vegetation. Of the tropical climate, there is the Sudanese, with heat but less rain, and the desert type, with great heat but wide daily variation and little rain. Besides these, there is the climate peculiar to the Mediterranean, with hot summers and rain in winter; and to the Cape district, with more moderate summers and winters and less rainfall. This is the climate of Africa today, but it has varied, and probably greatly, in the vast stretches of past time. The changes came with the distribution of land and water, the elevation and subsidence of land, the severance of the continent from Asia and South America, and the rise of the mountains in India and Europe that affect the air and sea currents. The rim of the great inland plateau which forms most of Africa falls to sea level near the coast and falls so steeply that the valleys of the rivers draining it do not spread into broad alluvial plains inviting settled populations. The history of tropical Africa would have been far different if it had possessed a Saint Law- rence, an Amazon, a Euphrates, a Ganges, a Yangtze, or a Nile south of the Sahara. The difference of land level within the continent brings strange contrasts. Sixty million years ago vast reptiles and dinosaurs wandered over this continent. It became, as the years passed, a zoological garden with wild animals of all sorts. Finally there came domesticated cattle, sheep, and goats and a tremendous devel- opment of insects. As Sir Harry Johnston well remarks, "Africa is the chief stronghold of the real Devil-the reactionary forces of Nature hostile to the uprise of Humanity. Here Beelzebub, King of the Flies, marshals his vermiform and arthropod hosts THE PEOPLING OF AFRICA -insects, ticks, and nematode worms-which more than III other continents (excepting Negroid Asia) convey to the skin, veins, intestines, and spinal marrow of men and other verte- brates the microorganisms which cause deadly, disfiguring, or debilitating diseases, or themselves create the morbid condition of the persecuted human being, beasts, bird, reptile, frog, or fish." 2 Africa is a beautiful land; not merely comely and pleasant, but haunted with swamp and jungle; sternly beautiful in its loveliness of terror, its depth of gloom, and fullness of color; its heaven-tearing peaks, its silver of endless sand, the might, width, and breadth of its rivers, depth of its lakes and height of its hot, blue heaven. There are myriads of living things, the voice of storm, the kiss of pestilence and pain, old and ever new, new and incredibly ancient. The anthropoid ape with the great brain who walked erect and used his hands as tools developed upon earth not less than half a million years ago. Traces of him have been found in Africa, Asia, and Europe and in the islands of the sea. Many types which developed have doubtless been lost, but one species has survived, driven hither and yon by cold and hunger, segre- gated from time by earthquake and glacier and united for defense against hunger and wild beasts. Groups of this species must have inbred and developed sub- types over periods of tens of thousands of years. Of the sub- species thus developed, scientists have usually distinguished at least three, all of which were fertile in their cross-breeding with one another. In course of time they have given rise to many transitional groups and intermediary types, so that less than two-thirds of the living peoples of today can be decisively allotted to one or the other of the definite subspecies. These subspecies include the long-headed dark people with more or less crinkled hair whom we know as Negroids; the broad- 2 Harry H. Johnston, The Negro in the New World (London: Methuen & Co., 1910), pp. 14, 15. 86 THE WORLD AND AFRICA headed yellow people with straight and wiry hair whom we call Mongoloids; and a type between these, possibly formed by their union, with bleached skins and intermediate hair, known as the Caucasoids. No sooner had these variant types appeared in Central Africa, on the steppes of Asia, and in Europe than they merged again. The importance of these types was not so much their physical differences and likenesses as their cultural develop- ment. As Frobenius says: "With vast and growing weight there begins to emerge today out of the microscopic spectacles of blind eyes, a new conception among living men of the unity of human culture." Inquiring search has made clear "here Greek, there old Mexican spirituality; here European economic development, there pictures of the glacial age; here Negro sculpture, there shamanism; here philosophy, there machines; here fairy tale, there politics." 3 Was Africa the cradle of the human race? Did it witness man's first evolution from the anthropoid ape to Homo sapiens? We do not know. Charles Darwin thought that "it is somewhat more probable that our early progenitors lived on the African continent than elsewhere." Sir G. E. Smith agrees with this and says that Africa "may have been the area of characteriza- tion, or, to use a more homely phrase, the cradle, both of the anthropoid apes and the human family." From Africa, Negroids may have entered Asia and Europe. On the other hand, the human race originating in Asia or even in Europe may have invaded Africa and become Negroid by long segregation in a tropical climate. But all this is conjecture. Of the origin of the Negro race or of other human races, we know nothing. But we do know that human beings inhabited Africa during the Pleistocene period, which may have been half a million years ago. A memoir presented by a well-known Belgian scientist, Al- fred Rutot, just before World War I, to the scientific section 3 Frobenius, op. cit. THE PEOPLING OF AFRICA of the Academic de Belgique caused some stir. It was accom- panied by a series of busts, ten in number, executed under careful supervision, by M. Louis Mascre. The busts were strik- ing. The attempt to reproduce various prehistoric types, be- ginning with Pithecanthropus erectus, was characterized as "audacious," and, of course, much confirmation is necessary of the facts and theories adduced. The chief interest of the paper was the reconstruction of the Negroids of Grimaldi, so-called from the finds at Mentone, France, helped out by similar remains found in the Landes and at Wellendorff in Lower Austria. How did specimens of Negroes so intelligent in appearance find themselves in the immediate presence of Caucasians, introducing amongst them the art of sculpture which presupposes an advanced stage of civilization? Science explains this phenomenon by the successive cataclysmic changes on our planet. For the quaternary period, Sicily formed part of the Italian mainland, the Strait of Gibraltar was non- existent, and one passed from Africa to Europe on dry land. Thus it was that a race of more or less Ethiopic type filtered in amongst the people inhabiting our latitudes, to withdraw later toward their primitive habitat. From the position of certain Negroid skeletons exhumed in France, some have concluded that this race carried and made use of the bow. This is uncertain; but it is well authenticated that these visitors brought to the white race the secret of sculpture, for their bones are almost invariably found in com- pany with objects sculptured on steatite or stone, in high or low relief. Some of their sculptures are quite finished, like the Wellendorff Venus, cut in a limestone block. Of this Venus, Rutot's Negroid type of man is a replica out of mammoth ivory. The shell net of four rows adorning the head of this artistic ancestor is a faithful reproduction of the ornament encircling the cranium of the skeleton found in the Grotte des Enfants at Mentone. For the ancient Negroid woman, Mascre has gone to a figure in relief found in the excavations at Lausses (Dor- 88 THE WORLD AND AFRICA dogne). The marked horn held in the right hand is that of a bison, the bracelets and armlets are exact copies of the orna- ments exhumed at Mentone. These Negroid busts are most attractive and intelligent look- ing and have no exaggerated Negro features. The Cro-Magnon man of Dordogne is a Magdalenian, contemporary with the Negroid intrusion. The fine proportions of the skull indicate unmistakable intellectuality. The remains left by this race in the caves of Perigord reveal great skill in the art of sculp- ting and painting animals, whereas the Negroids of that time specialized in the representation of their own species. The daggers of that epoch, described in Reliquiae A quitaniae, are engraved on reindeer horn, and the weapons underwent per- haps many practical improvements due to the effort, eventually successful, of the Magdalenians to drive out the Negroids, their artistic rivals.s "There was once an 'uninterrupted belt' of Negro culture from Central Europe to South Africa. 'These people,' says Griffith Taylor, 'must have been quite abundant in Europe toward the close of the Paleolithic Age. Boule quotes their skeletons from Brittany, Switzerland, Liguria, Lombardy, Il- lyria, and Bulgaria. They are universal through Africa and through Melanesia, while the Botocudos and the Lagoa Santa skulls of East Brazil show where similar folk penetrated to the New World.' Massey says: 'The one sole race that can be traced among the aborigines all over the earth or below it is the dark race of a dwarf, Negrito type.' " 5 It seems reasonable to suppose that Negroids originating in Africa or Asia appeared first as Negrillos. The Sahara at that time was probably covered with rivers and verdure and North 4 Francis Hoggan, "Prehistoric Negroids and their Contribution to Civili- zation," The Crisis, February 1920, p. 174. 5 J. A. Rogers. Sex and Race (New York: published by the author, 1942-44). Vol. I. p. 32. THE PEOPLING OF AFRICA 89 Africa was in close touch with Mediterranean Europe. There came upon the Negrillos a wave of Negroids who were hunters and fishermen and used stone implements. The remains of an African stone age are scattered over a wide area with amazing abundance, and there is such a resemblance between imple- ments found in Africa and those in Europe that we can apply, with few differences, the same names. The sequence in culture in Europe resembles the sequence in Africa although they may not have been contemporary. The most primitive type of stone implement was found in Uganda and is known as the pebble tool. The same pebble industry extended to Tanganyika and the Transvaal. This gave way to the hand-ax culture, which extended over North Africa, the Sahara, Equatorial Africa, West and South Africa. Superb hand axes and other tools are the evidence. Then the middle Paleolithic flake-tool culture spread over wide areas of Africa and is shown by perfect implements in South Africa and other places. The remains indicate a cave-dwelling people with a great variety of tools as well as beads and pottery. During the Pleistocene period came a new Stone Age, with agriculture, domestic animals, pottery, and the grinding and polishing of stone tools. Evidence of this culture is found in Egypt and North Africa, the Sahara in West Africa, East and South Africa. The Neolithic culture is of great significance. In Egypt it is found five thousand years before Christ. A thousand years later it changed from flint to copper. The Predynastic Egyptians who represented this culture were settled folk; they hunted and fished, and cultivated grain; made clothes and baskets, used copper, and were distinctly Negroid in physique. Probably they came from the south, from what is now Nubia. Later there came to Egypt other people of the type corresponding to the modern Beja, who lived in settled communities and used cop- per and gold. This brown Negroid people, like the modern go THE WORLD AND AFRICA Beja, Galla, and Somali, mixed increasingly with Asiatic blood, but their culture was African and extended by unbroken thread up the Nile and beyond the Somali peninsula. The first wave of Negroes were hunters and fishermen and used stone implements. They gradually became sedentary and cultivated the soil and must have developed early artistic apti- tudes and strong religious feeling. They built the stone monu- ments discovered in Negro Africa and the raised stones and carved rocks of Gambia. They did not mix with the Negrillos nor did they dispossess them, but recognized their ancestral land rights and seized unoccupied land. Thousands of years after this first wave of Negro immigrants there came another migration. The newcomers pushed north and west, dispossessed the Negrillos, and drove them toward the central forests and the deserts. They mixed more with the Negrillos, developed agriculture, the use of cattle and domestic fowl. They invented the working of iron and the making of pottery. Also, those who advanced farthest toward the north mixed with the Mediter- ranean race in varying degrees, so that sometimes the resulting population seemed white mixed with Negro blood and in other cases blacks mixed with white blood. The languages were mixed in various ways. Thus we had the various Libyan and Egyptian populations. All this migration and mixture took place long before the epoch of the first Egyptian dynasty. There exists today a fairly complete sequence of closely in- terrelated types of human beings in Africa, leading from Aus- tralopithecus to such known primitive African types as Rhode- sian Man and Florisbad Man. If these types are affiliated with, if not actually ancestral to, Boskop Man, the common presence of all three in the southern half of Africa is presumptive evi- dence that they all emerged on this continent from some com- mon ancestral stock. The name "Negro" originally embraced a clear conception of ethnology-the African with dark skin, so-called "woolly" hair, thick lips and nose; but it is one of the achievements of THE PEOPLING OF AFRICA 91 modern science to confine this type to a s~all district even in Africa. Gallas, Nubians, Hottentots, the Congo races, and the Bantus are not "genuine" Negroes from this view, and thus we find that the continent of Africa is peopled by races other than the "genuine" Negro. Nothing then remains for the Negro in the "pure" sense of the word save, as Waitz says, "a tract of country extending over not more than ten or twelve degrees of latitude, which may be traced from the mouth of the Senegal River to T'imbuktu." If we ask what justifies so narrow a limitation, "we find that the hideous Negro-type, which the fancy of observers once sawall over Africa, but which, as Livingstone says, is really to be seen only as a sign in front of tobacco-shops, has on closer inspection evaporated from almost all parts of Africa, to settle no one knows how in just this region. If we understand that an ex- treme case may have been taken for the genuine and pure form, even so we do not comprehend the ground of its geographical limitation and location. We are here in presence of a refine- ment of science which to an unprejudiced eye will hardly hold water." 6 Palgrave says: "As to faces, the peculiarities of the Negro countenance are well known in caricature; but a truer pattern may be seen by those who wish to study it any day among the statues of the Egyptian rooms in the British Museum: the large gentle eye, the full but n?t overprotruding lips, the rounded contour, and the good-natured, easy, sensuous expression. This is the genuine African model; one not often to be met with in European or American thoroughfares, where the plastic Afri- can too readily acquires the careful look and even the irregu- larity of the features that surrounded him; but which is com- mon enough in the villages and fields where he dwells after his own fashion among his own people; most common of all in the tranquil seclusion and congenial climate of Surinam planta- 6 Friedrich Ratzel, The History of Mankind, tr. from the German by A. J. Butler (London: Macmillan & Co., 1904), znd ed., Vol. II, p. 313. THE WORLD AND AFRICA tion. There you may find, also, a type neither Asiatic nor Euro- pean, but distinctly African; with much of independence and vigour in the male physiognomy and something that ap- proaches, if it does not quite reach, beauty in the female. Rameses and his queen were cast in no other mould." 7 What are the peoples who from vague prehistory emerged as the Africans of today? The answer has been bedeviled by the assumption that there was in Africa a "true" Negro and that this pure aboriginal race was mixed with a mythical "Hamitic race" which came apparently from neither Europe, Asia, nor Africa, but constituted itself as a "white element" in Negro Africa. We may dismiss this "Hamitic" race as a quite unneces- sary assumption and describe the present African somewhat as follows: At a period as early as three thousand years before Christ the people of the North African coastal plains were practically identical with the early Egyptians and present two types: long- headed Negroid people and broad-headed Asiatics. Among the Berber types today are tall and medium long-headed people with broad faces, swarthy skin, and dark eyes. They have many Negroid characteristics, especially toward the south. Beside these there are short, broad-headed people. These Berbers are the ones who correspond to the ancient Egyptians and who have close relationship to the Neolithic inhabitants of France. Among them today the Negro element is widely represented. It is in every part of Mauritania, where the reigning family itself is clearly of Negro descent. A large strain of Negro blood may also be found in Algeria. In East Africa we have the Massai, Nandi, Suk, and others, tall, slender, and long-headed. In the case of the Massai the nose is thinner and the color tinged with reddish-brown. The Bari people are tall and the Lutoko very tall. Then there are the Nilotics in the Nile valley, extending south of Khartoum 7 W. G. Pal grave, Dutch Guiana (London: Macmillan & Co., 1876), pp. 192-93. 6,,11.,'1''' HAller GENT6S .U-F'fuc"-lfa8~r ff{.OVIN';I,{~~ r,.tl,o( rnrm,S.(') .."l~r-_S.u-t>'M"S r~~l"rU~tr~I0I'I.r Affhc~ G('1'"(,.',,, ,,'ft:lV"1Idll"(. t('l~oT'(lr&.( SIH'tt~'~ c '¥,'I1.1\C"," G.1rnft1Jl'J..- ""1""p\·'1l:~U~d4.-'l .\ 1.1 n.'t Fr4J"'o( .U""",n.,(,,<1l~6 ~"'n"". ]3,)",,""'-7~n·L..: h.,,,, -r ".~~.\o..'t\t('f. o"dn·'dmat .·.·.l'·h{l>'.._·t"'IhO~ N"""h, l"rtMplh",· jJ"Q-IruII5' ,\m(,t·OI·,af 1Jns'o".{ llul!!,~,onl O1..1'\-tJ"'lr' ..ttll.\ltl.· ...t.:'r1('nf ...'.n. Co~j!-.\r·~l"n\)l"of VlO1l1oJll"'(. O)4nrtrOnl.:\n\ f.:_';' r 1",'1..'1i1t c, . Cc II.v., u~(A N '·""I"bnlo.:.., CllnrcCAUo..; .,.ti;"\~ nth\Unl..'f1\ hct ((O( (;"'Pf"~4~'l'-.ftHll,)";:' bl!.rf ~Ult"" ·tt ~I.:' 1'..,ri'.!3~\~~llll~\ '1.1 _$'1C\\l"ktn()f ~ll1Ctfl."'.ull'<>"I ,\"tn- ,';;ph~l1b,..r IIlr'·I·~ "tl~~·~b.\(rJ1J"an".;; l ...\Ci"1t't'tb; h\l'"'I.!1711( - t';qr,'" 13<>11.,.".1.-:; ')'''''~r ... Rl.Jmtmo( 11,0'"".( THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD in the twelfth century A.D., according to Lambertus of the Library of Ghent 94 THE WORLD AND AFRICA to Lake Kioga. Physically, as in the case of the Shilluk and Dinka, they are tall, very black, long-headed people, often with well-shaped features, thin lips, and high-bridged noses. The Nuba, tall, long-headed men, live in the hills of Kordofan. East of Kordofan are the Fung, with many tribes and with much Asiatic blood; and also broad-headed tribes like the Bongo and the Asande, a mixed people of reddish color with long heads. On the other side of Africa, the lower and middle portion of the Senegal River forms a dividing line between West African types of Negroes and the Negroes of the Sudan. South of the river are the Jolofs and the Serers. With these are the Senegalese, including the Tukolor and Mandingo tribes. They are dolicho- cephalic with both broad and narrow noses. They are rather tall, some of them very tall, and their skin is very dark. The Mandingo, or Mandi, are among the most important groups of French Senegal and live between the Atlantic and Upper Niger. They are tall and slender with fine features, beards, and rather lighter skin than that of neighboring Negroes. Among the most interesting of the West African people south of the Sudan are the Fulani, stretching from the Upper Niger to the Senegal River. They are Negroids, perhaps with Asiatic blood. They are straight-haired, straight-nosed, thin- lipped and long-headed, with slender physiques and reddish- brown color. The Songhay are tall and long-headed with well- formed noses and coppery-brown color. The people of Kanem and the Bagirmi cluster around Lake Chad. They are broad- nosed and dolichocephalic and resemble the Negroes on the Nile. In the east and South Africa are the Wachagga and the Fang and especially the Swahili, mixed people whose language dom- inates East Africa. They have all possible degrees of physical characteristics from Arabic to Negro. In South Africa there are the Bushmen, short, yellow, with closely-curled hair. Beside them live the Hottentots, probably Bushmen with Bantu ad- THE PEOPLING OF AFRICA 95 mixture and later with white Dutch admixture which gave rise to the so-called "coloured" people. The Negroes in the neighborhood of the Gulf of Guinea can be differentiated at present chiefly by their languages, which have been called Sudanic. Three great stocks prevail: the Twi, Ga, and Ewe. Belonging to these are the Ashanti, moderately tall men, long-headed with some broad heads; the Dahomey, tall, long-headed, and black; the Yoruba, including the peo- ples of Benin and Ibo, dark brown or black, closely curled hair, moderate dolichocephaly, and broad-nosed. Their lips are thick and sometimes everted, and there is a considerable amount of prognathism. The Kru, hereditary sailors, are typically Ne- groid with fine physiques. The Haussa of the central Sudan are very black and long-headed but not prognathic and with thin noses. Finally there are the Bantu, who are a congeries of peoples, belonging predominantly to Central and South Africa and oc- cupying the southern two-thirds of black Africa. The Bantu are defined on purely linguistic criteria. The term "Bantu" primarily implies that the tribes included speak languages characterized by a division of nouns into classes distinguished by their prefixes (usually twelve to fifteen), absence of sex- gender in the grammar, and the existence of alliterative con- cord, the prefix of each class (noun-class) being repeated in some form or another in all words agreeing with any noun of that class in the sentence. It is the reappearance of the prefix in every word in agreement with the noun that gives the alliterative effect. The southern Bantu outnumber all other groups of South Africa and are about four times as numerous as the Whites. They are divided into a large number of tribal units, each with its own distinctive name. In social organization and re- ligious system they show broad resemblances to one another, but in details of history there are a number of important 96 THE WORLD AND AFRICA differences which permit of their being classified into four groups: 1. The Shona peoples of Southern Rhodesia and of Portu- guese East Africa, 2. The Zulu-Xosa, chiefly in the coastal region south and east of the Drakensberg Mountains. 3· The Suto-Chwana occupy the greater portion of the high plateau north of the Orange River. 4· The Hercro-Ovambo, in the northern half of Southwest Africa and in southern Angola. In skin color the range is from the black of the Amaswazi to the yellowish. brown of some of the Bechuana. The prevalent color is a dark chocolate, with a reddish ground tint. The hair is uniformly short and woolly. The head is generally low and broad with a well-formed bridge and narrow nostrils. The face is moderately prognathous, the forehead prominent, cheek- bones high, lips fleshy. The Negro facial type predominates in all groups, but side by side with it in the Zulu and the Thonga sections are relatively long, narrow faces, thin lips, and high noses. The inhabitants of Natal and Zululand, divided originally into more than a hundred small separate tribes, are all now collectively known as "Zulus," a name derived from one of the tribes which, under the domination of Chaka, absorbed and conquered most of the others and so formed the Zulu nation which played so important a part in the political history of South Africa during the nineteenth century. Tribes vary in size, some having from a few hundred to a couple of thousand members. Others are much larger, for example, the Bakwena, 11,000; the Batawana, 17,500; the Bamagwato, 60,000; the Ovandonga, 65,000; the Ovakwan- yama, 55,000; the Amaswazi- again, number 110,000; while the Basuto, by far the largest of all and might be called a nation, number nearly half a million. THE PEOPLING OF AFRICA 97 The area of the western Bantu includes the Cameroons (French), Rio Muni (Spanish), the Gaboon (French), French Equatoria, the Congo (Belgian), Angola (Portuguese), and Rhodesia, with the fraction of Portuguese East Africa north of Zambesi. This vast area is the true "Heart of Africa," the tropi- cal rain forest of the Congo. Johnston enumerated over one hundred and fifty tribes in this area who speak Bantu or semi- Bantu tongues. The southern limit of the western Bantu is vague; the formation of the Lunda empire, the Yagga raids, and the subsequent encroachments of the Bajokwe (Kioko) have played havoc with tribal organization. The Bateke occupy a vast region on the right bank of the Congo which is now largely peopled by the Fang, who in their various expeditions and conquests have left their mark on most tribes north of the Ogowe River. Finally, in the midst of Africa are the Negrillos or pygmies, small men with reddish-brown or dark skin and brachicepahalic heads." These are but a few examples of the infinitely varied inhabi- tants of Africa. There is thus no one African race and no one Negro type. Africa has as great a physical and cultural variety as Europe or Asia. This is the Africa of which Langston Hughes sings: I've known rivers: I've known rivers ancient as the world and older than the flow of human blood in human veins. My soul has grown deep like the rivers. I bathed in the Euphrates when dawns were young. I built my hut near the Congo and it lulled me to sleep. I looked upon the Nile and raised the Pyramids above it.? 8 In this description of African peoples, I have relied principally on C. G. Seligmann's well-known studies. 9 Langston Hughes, "The Negro Speaks of Rivers," The Crisis, June 1921, p. 71. CHAPTER V EGYPT This is the story of three thousand years, from 5000 B.C. to 2000 B.C., and it tells of the de- velopment of human culture in the valley of the Nile below the First Cataract. CIVILIZA TION has flowed down to man along the valley ofgreat rivers where the soil was fertile and man need not fear hunger, and where the waters carried him to other peoples who were thinking of problems of human life and solving them in varied ways. Some say that human culture started in the valley of the Yangtze and of the Hoang Ho. Some say it came up from Black Africa; some that it came west from the Euphrates; but it had begun more than four thousand years before Christ. ' The development in Mesopotamia in the valley of the Tigris- Euphrates, which flows into the Persian Gulf and thence to the Indian Ocean, is striking. Before the year four thousand B.C. there is evidence that Negroid Dravidians and Mongoloid Sumerians ruled in southern Asia, in Asia Minor. and in the valley of the Tigris-Euphrates. Negroids followed them under Sargon, and Sargon boasted that "he commanded the black heads and ruled them." But it was in the valley of the Nile that the most significant continuous human culture arose, significant not necessarily be- OS EGYPT 99 cause it was absolutely the oldest or the best, but because it led to that European civilization of which the world boasts to- day and regards in many ways as the greatest and last word in human culture. Despite this, it is one of the astonishing results of the written history of Africa, that almost unanimously in the nineteenth century Egypt was not regarded as part of Africa. Its history and culture were separated from that of the other inhabitants of Africa; it was even asserted that Egypt was in reality Asiatic, and indeed Arnold Toynbee's Study of History definitely re- garded Egyptian civilization as "white," or European! The Egyptians, however, regarded themselves as African. The Greeks looked upon Egypt as part of Africa not only geographically but culturally, and.every fact of history and anthropology proves that the Egyptians were an African people varying no more from other African peoples than groups like the Scandinavians vary from other Europeans, or groups like the Japanese from other Asiatics. There can be but one adequate explanation of this vagary of nineteenth-century science: it was due to the slave trade and Negro slavery. It was due to the fact that the rise and support of capitalism called for rationalization based upon degrading and discrediting the Negroid peoples. It is especially significant that the science of Egyptology arose and flourished at the very time that the cotton kingdom reached its greatest power on the foundation of American Negro slavery. We may then without further ado ignore this verdict of history, widespread as it is, and treat Egyptian history as an integral part of African history. "The land of Egypt is six hundred miles long and is bounded by two ranges of naked limestone hills which sometimes ap- proach and sometimes retire from each other, leaving between them an average breadth of seven miles. On the north they widen and disappear, giving place to a marshy meadow plain which extends to the Mediterranean Coast. On the south they are no longer of limestone but of granite; they narrow to a 100 THE WORLD AND AFRICA point; they close in till they almost touch; and through the mountain gate thus formed, the river Nile leaps with a roar into the valley, and runs due north towards the sea." 1 It was a marvelous and unusual valley where a great river flowed out of the highlands of Central Africa and the mountains of the Horn, cut its way down through cliffs on either side crowned by deserts. The valley thus made was "burning and fertile, warm and smiling." Winds from the north tempered the heat of the sun so that the land was "green with meadows, golden with harvest, red with the blood of vines, a paradise of water, fruit, and flowers between two torrid deserts." The waters of the rivers rose and fell with the cumulative effect of springtime floods and summer heat. The spectacle of the in- undation; the mystery of the source of the waters which was not solved until the nineteenth century, had vast effect upon mankind, Egyptians, and all who came after them. The Negroids came as hunters and fishermen. Probably they came up from Nubia. They began to settle down and till the soil. They were the Tasians, five thousand and more years ago; the people of the Fayum and the Marimde, the Badarians, settled folk, who hunted and fished but also cultivated crops. They made cloth from flax and skins, wove baskets, fashioned pottery, and ground ax heads and vessels. They had copper and varied tools of flint capable of working timber. Ivory was used for tools. Amratians wandered in. They were of the type of the Beja. They used copper and gold. Thus we see in the Nile valley be- fore the reign of Menes, 3200 B.C., many groups and types of Negroids filtering in slow hesitant waves and gradually settling down in the first great experiment in human civilization. The Nile valley may be said to have invented agriculture. It was so obvious a way to make an easy living under pleasant conditions. Fresh rich soil rolled in each year, and the waters 1Winwood Reade, The Martyrdom. of Man (London: John Lane Com- pany, 1912), aoth ed., p. 1. EGYPT 101 that brought it kept it moist and fertile. Irrigation became a prime necessity, and flood control. The use of near-by build- ing materials-wood, brick, and stone-became natural; fibers were woven into cloth; architecture followed in the attempt to honor the dead with buildings which the dry climate preserved. Tools were invented. The first tools were stone, the eolith and the stone ax. Then came metals; copper, especially from Nubia, and then iron. Boats and ships sailed the river and the seas. The list of things which Egypt learned and handed down to us from that far day is enormous: the art of shaving, the use of wigs, the wearing of kilts and sandals, the invention of musical instruments, chairs, beds, cushions, and jewelry. The burial customs discovered in Europe came without rea- sonable doubt from Africa, brought by African invaders. Later the improvements made by the Egyptians were imitated in Sicily and Italy. Egyptian culture was in this way the forerunner of Greece. In the meantime, other people, Mongoloids, filtered in from Asia. As the years passed a fixed type of Egyptian began to develop. In Egypt were all the requirements for the first long experiment in civilization in ancient times: a well-watered valley, deserts and mountains on the outskirts to keep back the enemy and the beast; a favorable warm climate and a chance for contact wi th foreigners which could be regulated so as to keep out the invader and trade with him in goods and ideas. The civilization of Egypt began with their invention of fixing a calendar, 4241 B.C. There has been a great deal of contradiction and uncertainty concerning the peoples of Northwest Africa, variously called Libyans, Berbers, "Hamites," and Arabs. The Libyans or Ber- bers were akin to the Egyptians. They arose in prehistoric times in all probability, out of the mixture of Negroid and Mongoloid peoples, Negroids coming up from Central Africa and Mon- goloids crossing from Asia. The two types of long-headed and broad-headed peoples can be distinguished even today. Toward 102 THE WORLD AND AFRICA the east and the Nile delta were the Egyptians, forefathers of the peoples today called Beja, Galla, Somali, and Danakil. The Egyptian of predynastic times belonged then to the short, dark-haired, dark-eyed group of peoples, such as are found on both shores of the Mediterranean. The same stock extended beyond Upper Egypt into Nubia. Their physical characteristics exhibited a remarkable degree of homogeneity. Their hair was dark brown or black, and either curled or wavy. In the men there was scant growth of facial hair except on the chin, where a tuft was found. They had long, narrow foreheads and prominent occiputs. The faces were long and narrow ellipses; the noses were broader and especially flatter than those of the Europeans. The predynastic Egyptian was short, scarcely over sixty-four inches, dolichocephalic, with a nasal index of about 50, all characteristics of a group of people known as Beja, a black people who inhabit the eastern desert of Egypt, the Red Sea province of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan, and extend through the Italian colony of Eritrea to Abyssinia. The Beja are di- visible into four groups, one of which is the "Fuzzy-Wuzzy" of the British soldier. They are the least modified of the Beja tribes and are the modern representatives of the old predynastic Egyptian stock. In Egypt there is evidence of a gradual modification in the population from the beginning of dynastic times, so that by the Pyramid period Egyptians were of heavier build, with broader skulls and faces and heavier jaws. These are the people portrayed in such magnificent works of art of the Pyramid period as the sphinxes of Gizeh and the Louvre, and they are no doubt representative of a considerable part of the popula- tion of the Ancient Kingdom. They were the creators of the finest statuary, wall paintings, and sculptures in low relief to which Egypt attained, and the consciously archaistic Egyptians of the Twenty-sixth Dynasty endeavored to imitate their work as representing the highest development of national art. This EGYPT 103 applies only to Upper Egypt. We have no knowledge of what was happening in the delta through dynastic and predynastic times; the remains are hidden under great masses of alluvial deposits. The type described persisted and probably increased in number through dynastic times, and it is that of the fellahin of the present day. The modern Egyptian, with a stature of about sixty-six inches, shows no great variation between Up- per and Lower Egypt. He is long-headed. Moreover, in pass- ing southward, it has been pointed out that the eye and skin color darken, that the proportion of unusually broad noses in- creases, and spiral and crisp hair become more frequent. The history of civilization which began in Egypt was not so much a matter of dynasties and dates. It was an attempt to settle certain problems of living together-of government, defense. religion, family, property, science, and art. What we must re- member is that in these seven lines of human endeavor, it was African Egypt that made the beginning and set the pace. In some respects what they did has not been greatly im- proved upon even down to the twentieth century. In a primi- tive tribe, government was the family. But the valley of the Nile had to expand, rebuild, and implement this. It devised a ruler, a ruling family, and a ruling caste. It put them penna- nently upon a throne which became so old and stable that no man remembered when there was not an Egypt, and when there had been another world worth knowing. This govern- ment had to be built up from the family and clan, and this was accomplished through religion. The Egyptian religion came naturally from the primitive animism of the African forest and progressed to the worship of Ra, the sun god, giver of life and beauty to the Nile valley which was the world. Opposite Ra was Osiris, god of waters and fertility, and his sister and wife Isis, the black woman. Thus from earliest times women in Egypt had singular prominence and power. The gods reflected the physical facts of the valley. THE WORLD AND AFRICA The Greeks called the Egyptians "the most religious of men." There developed an oligarchy of gods and a priesthood which became a center of scientific knowledge; the laws of nature were studied and mathematical formulas devised. The work of the nation had to be organized, the toil of planting and reaping, irrigation, burden-bearing. Work was organized so that the great mass of the laborers toiled under the whip but toiled according to plan. From their toil arose the concept of property, of wealth to be used by king and priest and noble. Power became concentrated in the hands of the Pharaoh, who headed the clans and nomes. There was a long prehistoric period when many kings fought for supremacy in the valley, but at last there came concentration and unity which existed for an extraordinary length of time. Egypt did not remain a tyranny; an oligarchy of priests and nobles eventually took power from the Pharaoh. Then in time a popular revolution emancipated the masses. The people of Egypt were not enslaved. They have been described as a "sub- missive lighthearted race content with little, singing at their toil, working with taste and patience." This was the result of an unusually favorable economic organization. There was no need of starvation, exposure, or want. There was plenty in the valley if the river flow was controlled. The first duty of government was this control of the river, which led to the power of the king, to the science of the priest, to the independence of the laborer. Egypt under the Eighteenth Dynasty, 1500 B.c., has been called the first human example of state socialism, which was developed to an astonishing de- gree. Nor was the Egyptian formal and conventionalized. From a stiff traditional art in the earliest days, he developed in- dividuality in expression. His spirit inquired into fresh knowl- edge in this land where knowledge was "old as the world." The art of hieroglyphic writing was complete at the dawn of his- tory, 3500 B.C., and it lasted three millenniums, until in the fourth century B.C.' it was replaced by Coptic and Greek. EGYPT Beyond this was the gift of an unusual climate: the dry atmosphere with its baking sun; the chance to preserve what man delineated and carved and built, so that the art and literature of Egypt became first in the world and handed down inestimable treasure to succeeding peoples. The Egyptians studied and knew human beings; they separated their fellows into black people and brown, yellow people and white. They themselves were brown and black and so depicted themselves on their monuments. Many of the yellow peoples from the East filtered in and gradually there evolved a type which we know and would call a mulatto type, although that word brings the notion of a mixture of primary races, which was not true in Egypt. Here then, from the time that the Egyptians began history down to the birth of Christ, for five thousand years mankind evolved a pattern of human culture which be- came the goal of the rest of the world and was imitated every- where. When persons wished to study science, art, government, or religion, they went to Egypt. The Greeks, inspired by Asia, turned toward Africa for learning, and the Romans in turn learned of Greece and Egypt. It would be interesting to know what the Egyptians, earliest of civilized men, thought of the matter of race and color. Of race in the modern sense they seemed to have had no conception. On their monuments they depicted peoples by the color of their skin and their hair. The hair was treated in many ways: sometimes it was straight and Mongoloid; perhaps more often it was curled and Negroid. Now and then it was curly and hidden by wigs. The Egyptians painted themselves usually as brown, sometimes dark brown, sometimes reddish-brown. Other folk, both Egyptians and non-Egyptians, were painted as yellow. Often brown Egyp- tians were coupled with yellow women, either signifying less exposure to the sun or intermarriage with Mongoloids and whites. A few were painted as white, referring to some parts of North Africa and Europe. 106 THE WORLD AND AFRICA The separation of human beings by color seemed to have had less importance among the Egyptians than the separation by cultural status: black Pharaohs and black women; brown and yellow Pharaohs and yellow women. Their attitude toward people, white or black, was based on cultural contact. Black people and yellow people were often depicted as conquered and yielding obeisance to their brown conquerors. Sometimes they appeared as equals, exchanged gifts and courtesies. Some- times the Mongoloids and Negroids and whites were bound slaves: but in Egyptian monuments slavery was never attributed solely to black folk. We conclude, therefore, that the Egyptians were Negroids, and not only that, but by tradition they believed themselves descended not from the whites or the yellows, but from the black peoples of the south. Thence they traced their origin, and toward the south in earlier days they turned the faces of their buried corpses. Gradually, of course, the Egyptians became a separate inbred people with characteristics quite different from their neighbors. They were brown in color and painted themselves as such, but they recognized other colors and sorts of men. They were in continuous contact with the blacks to the south. Now and then they enslaved the blacks as they did the whites to the west and the yellow people to the east. But in the main their intercourse with the blacks consisted of trading. and fighting with a people against whom they must defend themselves fiercely, but upon whom they depended for trade and for immigrants. Continu- ally, black faces appear as Egyptian citizens. Herodotus in the fifth century B.C. described the Egyptians as black with curly hair. "The more we learn of Nubia and the Sudan," wrote Dr. D. Randall-MacIver, "the more evident does it appear that what was most characteristic in the predynastic culture of Egypt is due to intercourse with the interior of Africa and the immediate influence of that permanent Negro element which EGYPT has been present in the population of southern Egypt from remotest times to our own day." 2 Sir Flinders Petrie, in the same vein, wrote that it was re- markable how renewed vitality came to Egypt from the south." Seligmann said: "On one of the great proto-dynastic slate palettes dating from circa 3200 B.C. are represented captives and dead with woolly or frizzy hair and showing the same form of circumcision as is now practiced by the Masai and other Negroid tribes of Kenya Colony. Thus, though there is not, and cannot be, any records of skin color, there is every reason to believe that these men were as much 'Negroes' as many of the East African tribes of the present day to whom this name is commonly applied. Moreover, the Archaeological Survey of Nubia has brought to light a burial-with typical Negro hair -dating to the Middle Kingdom (about 2000 B.C.), while four Negresses were found in a single cemetery, dating as far back as the late predynastic period-say about 3000 B.C." 4 Randall-MacIver of the Department of Egyptology and Arthur Thomson, professor of Anatomy, at Oxford, in a report on what is one of the most extensive and complete surveys of Ancient Egyptian skeletal material ever made, stated that of the Egyptians studied belonging to the periods from the Early Predynastic to the Fifth Dynasty, 24 per cent of the males and 19Y2 per cent of the females were to be classified as Ne- groes. "In every character of which we have a measure they conform accurately to the Negro type." For the period extending from the Sixth to the Eighteenth Dynasty, of the specimens studied about 20 per cent of the males and 15 per cent of the females are grouped with the 2 Arthur Thomson and David Randall-Maclver, Ancient Races in the Thebaid (London: 1905). 8 W. M. Flinders Petrie, A History of Egypt from the Earliest Times to the XVI Dynasty (London: Methuen & Company, 1903), 5th ed., Vol. 1. 4 C. G. Seligmann, Races of Africa (New York, Henry Holt & Co., 1930), Ch. III. P. 52. 108 THE WORLD AND AFRICA Negroes. For both periods there was a goodly per cent of specimens, the "intermediates," that show some Negroid traits, but in the "intermediates" the Negro features were not suf- ficiently numerous or distinct enough to warrant such skeletons being classed with the Negroes." In the United States all these would be legally Negroes. According to Dr. F. L. Griffith of Oxford, writing of the Ne- groids of the Old Kingdom, "more than one Nubian (nh'si), dark-colored or Negroid, can be traced as holding a high posi- tion in Egypt or even in the royal court at Memphis during the Fourth and Fifth Dynasties." There are in the Boston Museum of Fine Arts two excellent limestone portraits of an Egyptian prince and his wife dating, according to their discoverer, Dr. Reisner, from the Old King. dom. The prince shows practically none of the features that are traditionally regarded as being distinctive of the Negro, but the princess presents every earmark of the extreme Negro type. The famous Stele of Una discovered by Mariette at Abydos is "the longest narrative inscription and the most important historical document from the Old Kingdom." Dr. Breasted's interpretation of the text records among other things how Uni, an officer of King Pepi I of the Sixth Dynasty, annihilated a group of Asiatics to the north of Sinai and invaded Palestine with an army "of many tens of thousands," made up of sol- diers recruited among "the Irthet Negroes, the Mazoi Negroes, the Yam Negroes, the Wawat Negroes, the Kau Negroes, and Negroes from the land of Temeh." Each of the districts here named has been identified with districts in Ethiopia. The in- habitants of Egypt were thenceforth a Negroid people in which Semitic, Nilotic, and Sudanese-Negro elements were fused. Before the First Dynasty there must have been a long series of rulers who came out of the south, conquered the people, and consolidated their powers. Upper Egypt historically always had precedence over Lower Egypt, and the First Dynasty came 5 Thomson and Randall-Maciver, op. cit. TI-IE POLITICAL AND CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF AFRICA 1325 B.C.-A.D. 1850 (The dates indicate roughly the widest development of the different states; the lines show approximately the boundaries of the states at the date of widest expansion.) 110 THE WORLD AND AFRICA from the direction of the heart of Africa. Eight kings are known in this dynasty, during which there was gradual advance in use of writing. Memphis was established as capital, and the eastern borders of the valley firmly conquered. The First Dynasty appears to have moved up from Punt. The Third Dynasty, which led to the Fourth, shows a strongly Ethiopian face in Sa Nekht; the Twelfth Dynasty we can trace to a Galla origin; the Eighteenth Dynasty was Ethiopian paled by marriage; the Twenty-fifth Dynasty was from distant Meroe. Among the Pharaohs of the earlier dynasties whose statues or recovered bones show them to have been deeply tinged with Negro blood are King Den of the First Dynasty, King Khase- khemui of the Second Dynasty. Sir Harry Johnston wrote: "The Dynastic Egyptians were not far distant in physical type from the Galla of today, but they had perhaps some element of the proto-Semite; and their language is still rather a puzzle to classifiers, though mainly Kushite in its features. The Dynastic Egyptians evidently con- centrated themselves in the narrow strip of fertility along the banks of the Nile, not colonizing very markedly the Red Sea coastlands. By about 8000 years ago they had become the con- querors and rulers of Lower and Upper Egypt." Stone in the Third Dynasty began to be used for building. In the Fourth Dynasty came the great Pyramid of Gizeh, "the greatest monument that any man ever had." It contains more stone than any other building ever erected and yet is one of the earliest structures of the world. Herodotus tells us that one hundred thousand men were levied for three months at a time during the season of inundation when ordinary labor was at a standstill; and yet at this rate the building occupied twenty years. There was probably no hardship in the employment of a small percentage of the people at this work when all were idle, and the training and skill were of great advantage to the nation. In the Fourth Dynasty was erected the well-known statue of EGYPT 1111 the Sphinx with the lion's body and Negro head entirely carved in native rock. It must have been carved out of the rocky knoll of a hill. In this dynasty too there was the artistic attempt of man to rival nature. Vast buildings were placed before a back- ground of hills or on a natural height. An artificial hill was built on which some great work of man was placed. Vast masses were used in construction. The sculptor sought to rival and even surpass nature. The painter used coloring and tints. In the Fifth Dynasty the power of the priests was evidently growing, and religious foundations appear and with it a decline in the boldness of assertion of the earlier architecture. In the Sixth Dynasty came some of the great raids upon the Libyans to the east of Egypt. Tens of thousands of soldiers, Negroes particularly from the Sudan, beat this part of the land into subjection. Then the Pharaoh's army turned south and west and went through Nubia to force into subjection Negroes who were pressing northward upon the Egyptian state. Trad- ing expeditions were sent to Punt. This was a time of active foreign conquest and exploration. One of the kings brought back to Egypt a dwarf from the Sudan. The Seventh and Eighth Dynasties form an early inter- mediate period. The power of the kings at Memphis seems to have fallen into decay, perhaps through foreign invasion in the delta. During the Ninth and Tenth dynasties the invading race spread their rule over Upper Egypt. The Middle King- dom began with the Eleventh Dynasty, when the Princes of Thebes became independent again. The ruler, Usertesen I, is pictured as triumphing over Asiatic and Negro. Evidently the defense of the kingdom from invaders became a serious prob- lem when Egypt grew great and rich. A new vigor came into the administration with Amenemhat, who fought the Nubians and the Asiatics. The history of Sanehat (Sinuhi) is illustrative of the time. Because of the death of his father, he fled to Syria, where he became a ruler. "It gives a very curious view of the relation of Egypt to Syria at the beginning of the Twelfth 112 THE WORLD AND AFRICA Dynasty. A fugitive Egyptian was superior to the Syrians, and by his education and ability might rise to high power, much like some English adventurer in Central Africa at the present time." 6 Ameny has left us a record of what a powerful noble of his day did for the workers. "1 was in favour and much beloved, a ruler who loved his city. Moreover, 1 passed years as ruler in the Oryx nome. All the works of the king's house came into my hands. Behold he set me over the gangers of the lands of the herdsmen in the Oryx nome, and 3000 bulls of their draught stock .... Not a daughter of a poor man did I wrong, not a widow did 1 oppress, not a farmer did 1 oppose, not a herds- man did 1 hinder. There was not a foreman of five from whom I took his men for the works. There was not a pauper around me, there was not a hungry man in my time. When there came years of famine, 1 arose. 1 ploughed all the fields of the Oryx nome, to its southern and its northern boundaries. I made its inhabitants live, making provision for them; there was not a hungry man in it, and 1 gave to the widow as to her that had a husband: nor did 1 favour the elder above the younger in all that 1 gave. Afterward the great rises of the Nile came, pro- ducing wheat and barley, and producing all things, and I did not exact the arrears of the farm." 7 In this dynasty the Pharaohs began to associate their sue- cessors with them so as to make less danger of change at the time of their death. The lakes of Moeris were dammed, and the overflow of the Nile was thus regulated by a vast embank- ment twenty miles in length. One king of the Twelfth Dynasty, Usertesen III, was espe- cially triumphant over the Negroes who were threatening' Egypt from the south, and this Pharaoh set up a boundary across which the Nubians must not come. To celebrate this dash between the Negroid Egyptian and the Central African, we have the first specimen of Egyptian poetry extant: 6 Petrie. op. cit., Vol. I. p. 156. 7 Ibid.) Vol. I, pp. 160-61. EGYPT He has come to us, he has taken the land of the well, the double crown is placed on his head. He has come, he has united the two lands, he has joined the kingdom of the upper land with the lower. He has come, he has ruled Egypt, he has placed the desert in his power. He has come, he has protected the two lands, he has given peace in the two regions. He has come, he has made Egypt to live, he has destroyed its afflictions. He has come, he has made the aged to live, he has opened the breath of the people. He has come, he has trampled on the nations, he has smitten the Anu, who knew not his terror. He has come, he has protected his frontier, he has rescued the robbed. He has come ... of what his mighty arm brings to us. He has come, we bring up our children, we bury our aged by his good favour.s One can see from this poem what national fervor of delight arose in Egypt when the further aggression of Central African tribes was stopped. The Twelfth Dynasty marks the firm organization of the country and brilliancy of development under able leaders followed by internal prosperity. Then there was a tide of foreign conquest under Usertesen III, a splendid reign under Amenem- hat III, followed by a time of decay. The art work of the dy- nasty was fine, with great technical perfection. From the Thirteenth to the Seventeenth Dynasties there comes a period which is obscure. During this time Egypt was conquered by the Hyksos kings, who were probably from the Arabian desert; but whether at the beginning or at the end of this period we are not certain. At the end of the kings of the 8 Ibid., Vol. I, p. 183. 114 THE WORLD AND AFRICA Thirteenth Dynasty comes Ra-Nehesi, the king's eldest son, who is clearly called a Negro. This shows, of course, the de- velopment that had taken place in Egypt during two thousand years. There had grown up an Egyptian mulatto race differ- -entiated in color and other physical characteristics from the Central Africans. So much so that the great triumph of Egypt was the conquest over these Africans. But this did not mean that there were no black folk in Egypt. Despite the general development of the mulatto race, the Negro