Cogent Psychology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/oaps20 Psychosis in adolescents in Africa: A scoping review for current understanding and future directions Samuel Adjorlolo & Mawuko Setordzi | To cite this article: Samuel Adjorlolo & Mawuko Setordzi | (2021) Psychosis in adolescents in Africa: A scoping review for current understanding and future directions, Cogent Psychology, 8:1, 1949173, DOI: 10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 © 2021 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. Published online: 16 Jul 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1542 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 1 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=oaps20 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY | REVIEW ARTICLE Psychosis in adolescents in Africa: A scoping review for current understanding and future directions Received: 22 January 2021 Samuel Adjorlolo 1,2* and Mawuko Setordzi2 Accepted: 15 June 2021 Abstract: Research into psychosis in adolescents is important in Africa in view of *Corresponding author: Samuel Adjorlolo, Department of Mental Health, the high burden of mental disorders and prevalence of risk factors such as child School of Nursing and Midwifery, maltreatment implicated in the etiology of mental health problems. In this paper, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana we synthesized the existing literature on psychosis in adolescents in Africa to E-mail: sadjorlolo@ug.edu.gh understand current developments and chart a pathway for robust research agenda Reviewing editor: on psychosis. A search was conducted on electronic databases, including Africa Daryl O’Connor, United Kingdom Index Medicus and Scopus and selected journals for papers. Google, Google Scholar, Additional information is available at the end of the article reference list of papers selected for inclusion in the review and study authors were contacted for additional papers and grey literature. A total of 11 articles were included in this review and discussed under the following thematic areas:(1) assessment of psychosis; (2) prevalence of psychosis; (3) demographic/psychosocial correlates of psychosis; (4) clinical correlates of psychosis; (5) substance misuse and psychosis; and (6) psychosis literacy and help-seeking behavior. A pathway for research into psychosis centering on the representation of psychosis, risk and protective factors, management/treatment of psychosis and aforementioned the- matic areas was proffered. ABOUT THE AUTHOR PUBLIC INTEREST STATEMENT Dr. Samuel Adjorlolo is a senior lecturer at the Psychosis is a major mental disorder that is asso- Department of Mental Health Nursing, University ciated with disorganized behaviors and thought of Ghana. Dr. Adjorlolo’s research focuses on processes. Adverse environmental factors such as mental health, specifically child and adolescent child abuse, conflict and hunger that are highly mental health, maternal mental health, and prevalent in African countries increase the risk of forensic mental health. He is an Executive psychosis. Studies have shown that the period of Officer of the Research and Grant Institute adolescence confers a special vulnerability for psy- (REGIG), a non-governmental organization dedi- chosis and psychotic like experiences (PLEs). cated to the generation, dissemination, and uti- Despite the growing interest in psychosis research lization of research in Ghana. in adolescents in Africa, no study has synthesized Mr. Mawuko Setordzi is a registered mental the literature to provide a comprehensive and one- health nurse. He holds a Master of Philosophy stop understanding of developments in the field. degree in Nursing from the University of Ghana. This review was also undertaking to chart His research interests center on adolescent a pathway for a research agenda. This review mental health. identified and integrated 11 studies on psychosis among adolescents. The review revealed that research is needed to investigate psychosis in adolescents more broadly. Of interest are the representation or manifestation of psychosis, risk and protective factors and management/treat- ment of psychosis. © 2021 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. Page 1 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 Subjects: Mental Health;;; Child & Adolescent Psychiatry & Clinical Psychology; Mental Health Research; Psychological Disorders Keywords: Psychosis; Schizophrenia; adolescents; review; Africa 0.1. Introduction Psychosis is a mental disorder characterized by a range of cognitive, motor and behavioral dysfunc- tions, such as delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thought and speech and negative symptoms, such as anhedonia. The symptoms of psychosis can occur in a range of disorders such as schizo- phrenia, mood disorders and substance misuse (Gaebel & Zielasek, 2015). Globally, psychosis has received significant research and professional attention mainly due to its debilitating nature, poor prognosis and reduced remission (Saha et al., 2007; Walker et al., 2015), as well as association with behavioral maladies, such as suicide and depressive symptoms (Kelleher et al., 2012; Palmer et al., 2005; Subramaniam et al., 2014). Psychosis is often diagnosed in young adulthood; however, it can manifest first in adolescence and sometimes in childhood as psychotic-like experiences (PLEs; Zavos et al., 2014). PLEs are subclinical psychotic symptoms that occur outside the context of sleep disturbance or are unrelated to drug use (Van Os et al., 2009). Among some individuals, PLEs can be a marker for future diagnosis with psychotic disorders (Fusar-Poli et al., 2013; Van Os et al., 2009). Therefore, studies focusing on PLEs are as important as those on patients diagnosed with psychotic illness. Understanding the nature and characteristics of PLEs would help in identifying at-risk indivi- duals who would benefit from early interventions to improve their mental well-being. The current review is focused on integrating the literature on psychosis in adolescents in Africa. Psychosis is defined broadly to include clinically diagnosed psychotic disorders and PLEs. Epidemiological studies have suggested that the period of adolescence confers a special vulnerability for psychosis and PLEs, relative to adulthood (Linscott & Van Os, 2013). The prevalence and burden of psychosis in adolescence have been attributed to the ontogenetic or progressive structural brain changes (Benes, 2003; Ziermans et al., 2012). For example, structural and functional studies of brain characteristics in psychosis suggest strongly that the normal adolescent neuromaturational processes may go awry, thereby increasing the risk for the emergence of psychotic syndromes (Holtzman et al., 2013). The diathesis stress model (Kendler, 2020) expanded on the above, noting that, biological predispositions are only meaningful when they interact with harmful environmental stressors. That is, very potent environmental factors or stressors have significant impact on the maturing brain and can exacerbate the risk of psychosis among persons with genetic or biological predispositions. Compared with in adult, adolescents diagnosed with psychosis tend to suffer from several adverse outcomes, including lower premorbid functioning, more hospitalizations, poorer cognitive and execu- tive functioning, and poor prognosis (Patel et al., 2020). Studies targeting children, adolescents and young adults are extremely important as they offer a unique opportunity to optimize interventions to promote better functional outcomes (Larsen et al., 2007; Ronald et al., 2013; Welsh & Tiffin, 2014). The Global Burden of Disease Study identified mental and substance use disorders as among the leading causes of disability-associated burden in Africa. For example, compared with the global rate of 23%, mental and substance use disorders accounted for 19% of years lived with a disability in sub-Saharan Africa (Charlson et al., 2014). Major mental health disorders such as depression, bipolar disorder and psychosis are projected to increase the burden of mental health problems by 2050 (Charlson et al., 2014). However, scholarly efforts over the years have focused overwhelming on depression (Sankoh et al., 2018). Meanwhile, in most African settings, mental illness appeared to be conceptualized within psychotic symptoms framework (Ventevogel et al., 2013) whereby a “truly” mentally ill person is expected to exhibit psychotic symptoms such as hallucinatory and delusional tendencies, disorganized and bizarre behaviors, and/or wander aimlessly on the street or public space (Adjorlolo, 2016; Ventevogel et al., 2013). Research into psychosis is, therefore, extremely important in Africa settings to underscore illness representation, treatment modalities and treatment outcomes. The evidence on the nexus between adversities and psychosis from high income countries (Davies et al., 2020; Oliver et al., 2020; Rodrigues & Anderson, 2017) provides Page 2 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 suitable justification for research on psychosis in a continent riddled with adverse environmental factors. Notable among them are malnutrition, child labor, child maltreatment and abuse, physical conditions such as HIV, violence/war/conflict (Owoso et al., 2018), traumatic brain injury, poor antenatal/obstetric history (Okewole et al., 2016), childhood developmental abnormalities and early infections (Messias et al., 2007). Current developments, indeed, suggest that there is a growing interest to establish a research agenda in psychosis in Africa to support evidence- based, culturally sensitive decision-making and discussions bothering the detection/assessment and prevention of psychosis through public health intervention problems. For instance, research on assessment (Mamah et al., 2014; Owoso et al., 2014) and prevalence of psychosis (Mamah et al., 2013; Okewole et al., 2015) have been pursued vigorously, recently. However, a major gap relates to the lack of studies synthesizing the literature on psychosis in adolescents in Africa. The growing literature is scattered across different journal and publication outlets, making it extremely difficult to have a comprehensive and one-stop understanding of developments in the field. This development has largely hampered discussions on psychosis and adolescents in Africa, including prescribing areas where research may be needed most. Efforts to chart a pathway for a robust research agenda on psychosis in adolescents in Africa and as well as provide insight into the directions and values of undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analysis have suffered from a lack of integrated review of research on psychosis. In fulfilling this gap, the current review is aimed at synthesizing the existing literature on psychosis in adolescents in Africa. 1. Methodology A scoping review was conducted to take stock of the literature on psychosis in adolescents in Africa. In scoping review, empirical studies focusing on thematically similar research areas, such as psychosis are integrated, regardless of the research designs used (Cosgrave et al., 2019). A scoping review is a generic synthesis of studies of varied designs to proffer broader descriptions and analysis of developments in a particular area of enquiry. It is deemed appropriate for the current project because no study has reviewed and integrated the literature on psychosis in adolescents in Africa to provide directions for systematic reviews and/or meta-analysis. The current review is situated in the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley (2005) for undertaking scoping reviews; identifying relevant studies, selecting and collating studies, summarizing and reporting the results. To proceed, we followed the PRISMA guidelines for conducting reviews. 1.1. Identifying relevant studies Different strategies were used to identify relevant papers. First, a search was conducted on relevant electronic databases, namely Africa Index Medicus, Scopus, EBSCoHost, CINHAL and PubMed. The search terms used were “psychosis”, schizoph*, “schizoaffective”, psycho*, halluci- nat*, delusion*, paranoi* AND “adolescents” OR “adolescence” OR “teens” OR “teenagers” OR “youth” AND “Africa”. Second, journals dedicated to publishing African scholarship on mental health were searched. These include the Southern African Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, South African Journal of Psychology and African Journal of Psychiatry. Additionally, we searched Google and Google Scholar engines for both grey and published literature. The reference lists of papers selected for inclusion were also searched for additional papers. Lastly, we contacted individual authors who have published in psychosis among adolescence in Africa for additional literature. Due to technical and financial constraints, the search was restricted to papers published in English up to September 2019 and available online. 1.2. Study selection The papers were subjected to a predetermined inclusion criterion, i.e., papers reporting on psy- chosis in adolescents/youth in Africa: The following exclusion criteria were applied; (1) language other than English, (2) publication not based on findings from participants recruited from Africa (e.g., African immigrants) and (3) publications in which data on adolescents and adults were aggregated and analyzed together. The titles and abstracts of the identified papers were screened by the authors during the initial search. Papers selected for inclusion were further reviewed, with Page 3 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 Figure 1. Prisma flow diagram of database search. a focus on the age of the participants and settings where the studies were conducted. Disagreements relating to the inclusion of papers were resolved via soliciting the opinion of a third party who was a professor of mental health and/or consensus. 2. RESULTS A summary of the search and screening processes is illustrated in Figure 1. In all, a total of 11 papers were deemed appropriate for the study. The characteristics and major findings of the studies are summarized in Table 1. The included papers were further examined to determine if they could be grouped into meaningful themes based on the principal areas of investigations. This was done by critically reviewing mostly the heading, background, research objectives/goals and methodology sections of the papers included in the review. The themes shared by at least two papers were retained for inclusion in this review. The following themes were identified: (1) assessment of psychosis; (2) prevalence of psychosis; (3) demographic correlates of psychosis; (4) clinical correlates of psychosis; (5) substance misuse and psychosis; and (6) psychosis literacy and help-seeking behavior. 2.1. Assessment of psychotic experience/diagnosis of psychosis In assessing psychosis, clinicians or researchers often use interview guides and self-report measures formulated along the major diagnostic manuals (i.e., DSM and ICD). Because majority of the existing assessment measures were developed in Western countries, there are concerns about their appro- priateness and usefulness when administered on non-Western samples (Moleiro, 2018). The incon- sistencies regarding the cross-cultural application of screening and/or diagnostic measures highlight Page 4 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 Page 5 of 16 Table 1. Summary of studies included in the review Author/Year Country Sample Characteristics & size Category of sample Psychosis Measure Main Findings Paruk et al. (2009) South Africa 70 adolescents Clinical Clinically diagnosed with * More than half used aged 12–18 years old; 80% psychosis substance. males *Common diagnoses were schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorders. *85.7% treated with first- generation antipsychotic Mamah et al. (2012) Kenya 2,758 youth aged 14– Community/household Modified version of PRIME- *Overall prevalence of 29 years old; Screen psychosis was 45.5% 1,628 males. *Persecutory ideation and auditory hallucinations were severe in females. *Participants clustered into 4 groups: Normative (55%); high symptom (11%), intermediate symptom (19%) and grandiose symptom (15%). Ndetei et al. (2012). Kenya 2,963 adolescents School Composite International * Prevalence of psychotic 1,513 males Diagnostic Interview, version experience was 23% *Three categories of participants: non-psychotic class (83.8%), a predominantly hallucinatory class (“type I PLE”; 12.7%), and 3) a multiple symptom class (“type II PLE”; 3.5%). Paruk et al. (2013) South Africa 45 adolescents aged 12– Clinical Clinically diagnosed with *Cannabis use was common. 18 years; psychosis * No gender difference in 39 (86.6%) males cannabis use (Continued) Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 Page 6 of 16 Table1. (Continued) Mamah et al. (2013) Kenya 1,971 adolescents aged School Composite International *Prevalence of psychosis was 19 years or less; 938 males Diagnostic Interview, version 22.1%. 3.0 *Psychotic experiences more common in males than females. *Participants classified into 3 groups: Normative class (83.3 %), predominately. Hallucinatory class (Type 1 psychosis: 9.6 %), and a panpsychotic class (Type 2 psychosis: 7.2 %). Owoso et al. (2014). Kenya 182 participants aged 14– Community/household Modified version of PRIME- * mPRIME had a sensitivity of 29 years; Screen & 40% and a specificity of 108 males. SIPS. 64.8% Paruk et al. (2015) South Africa 45 adolescents with first Clinical Clinically diagnosed with * More than half reported episode EOP aged 10– psychosis cannabis misuse 18 years; 31 males *Poor recognition of prodromal in about half of participants *Males significantly abused cannabis than females. * Mean duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) was 27.2 weeks Okewole et al. (2015). Nigeria 508 adolescents School Prodromal Questionnaire- * Prevalence of prodromal 37% males Brief Version symptoms was 20.9% *Females reported more prodromal symptoms. * Major life event, being bullied or abused were associated with prodromal symptoms. (Continued) Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 Page 7 of 16 Table1. (Continued) Mamah et al. (2016) Kenya 330 adolescents aged 14– School SIPS & WERCAP * Psychiatric comorbidities 20 years; 116 males and increased psychosocial stress were common in participants identified as high risk for psychosis. * Conversion rate from high risk to psychotic disorders was 3.8% Paruk et al. (2017) South Africa 45 adolescents with first Clinical Clinically diagnosed with *84% were diagnosed with episode EOP aged 10– psychosis schizophrenia spectrum 18 years; 31 males psychotic disorder. Paruk et al., 2018 South Africa 45 adolescents with first Clinical Clinically diagnosed with *EOP adolescents came from episode EOP psychosis disadvantaged demographic background. * EOP adolescents used cannabis frequently than non-EOP adolescents EOP = Early-onset psychosis; SIPS = Structured interview of psychosis-risk syndromes; WERCAP = Washington early recognition center affectivity and psychosis Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 the need to examine the cultural appropriateness of measures used to assess psychosis and/PLEs in Africa (Adjorlolo, 2018; Adjorlolo & Watt, 2019). We examined all the eleven (11) studied included in this review to understand how psychosis or psychotic experience was measured. It was observed that 45% (n = 5) of the studies gathered data on participants diagnosed with psychosis at a local health facility (Paruk et al., 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2009). There was, however, no information regarding the assessment modalities and data sources that formed the basis of the clinical diagnosis. Studies (n = 6; 55%) that recruited participants in the community or school settings (Mamah et al., 2012, 2016, 2013; Ndetei et al., 2012; Okewole et al., 2015; Owoso et al., 2014) used the following measures to assess for psychotic experience; (1) Structured Interview of Psychosis-risk Syndrome (Miller et al., 2003); (2) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI); (3) Washington Early Recognition Center Affectivity and Psychosis (WERCAP) screen, (4) Prevention through Risk Identification, Management, and Education (PRIME) and Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version (Loewy et al., 2011). Of these, only the WERCAP and PRIME have been subjected to psychometric properties examination in Kenya. Owoso et al. (2014) found that the sensitivity (40%) and specificity (68%) of a modified version (mPRIME) of the 12-item PRIME performed poorly in screening for psychotic experience in Kenyan sample. The psychosis facet of the WERCAP, on the other hand, exhibited excellent psychometric properties, with Cronbach’s Alpha of .92, sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 100% at the optimal cut- point of >30 (Mamah et al., 2014). 2.2. Prevalence of psychotic experience and psychosis Insight into the prevalence of psychosis is extremely important in the decision to establish and invest in a robust research agenda for psychosis. Only three studies (27%) included in this review investigated the prevalence of psychosis. In a poor, slum community in Kenya, the prevalence of PLEs was 45%, with males (46.3% out of 1,628) and females (44.8% out of 1,064) reporting similar prevalence rates (Mamah et al., 2012). The authors further classified the participants into four groups based on their endorsement of psychotic symptoms: Normative (55%), high symptom (11%), intermediate symptom (19%), and grandiose symp- tom (15%). Another study involving 1, 971 students from Kenya found a lifetime prevalence of 22.1%, with 16.3% reporting that the psychotic experience was unrelated to sleep dis- turbance or drug use (Mamah et al., 2013). In this sample, the prevalence of specific psychotic experiences ranges from 15.3% (unrelated to sleep or drug = 9.7%) for visual hallucinations to 10.1% (unrelated to sleep or drug = 7.3%) for persecutory ideation. A gendered analysis of the specific psychotic experiences revealed that males reported significantly more visual hallucination, mind control, referential thinking and persecutory ideation than their female counterpart. Based on the pattern of endorsement of psychotic symptoms, the participants were classified into normative class (83.3%), a predominantly hallucinatory class (Type 1 psychosis: 9.6%), and a pan-psychotic class (Type 2 psychosis: 7.2%). The results further showed that significantly more males belonged to the psychotic classes. Lastly, among 508 students from Nigeria, the prevalence of prodromal symptoms was estimated at 20.9% (Okewole et al., 2015). 2.3. Demographic /psychosocial correlates of psychotic experience A total of seven studies (63%) provided data on the demographic characteristics and psychosis/ psychotic experience. Participants recruited from health centers in South Africa were more likely to be blacks, come from poor socioeconomic background, have a family history of mental illness and resident in a rural area (Paruk et al., 2013, 2018, 2009). Studies on gender have reported mixed or inconsistent findings, perhaps owing to differences in data sources. Data on clinical samples in south Africa revealed that significantly more males than females were diagnosed with psychosis in South Africa (Paruk et al., 2015, 2009). Among student samples from Nigeria, female students reported significantly more pro- dromal symptoms than their male counterpart (Okewole et al., 2015). Among males and females recruited from a slum in Kenya, there was no statistically significant overall difference; females sig- nificantly rated persecutory ideation and auditory hallucinations to be severe (Mamah et al., 2012). In contrast, a study conducted among clinical samples from South Africa reveals that gender did not significantly influence symptom severity and presentation (Paruk et al., 2015). Page 8 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 Okewole et al. (2015) reported that experiencing a major life event and being bullied significantly predicted prodromal symptoms of psychosis (Okewole et al., 2015). In a related study from community samples in Kenya, relationship difficulties with family members, death of someone, poor health status of a family member and separation in the family correlated significantly with psychotic experience (Mamah et al., 2016) 2.4. Clinical characteristics and psychosis A total of four studies (36.36%) provided information on clinical characteristics and psychosis. Among participants recruited from health facilities in South Africa who were given a psychosis-spectrum diagnosis, the majority (i.e., 80%) were diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorders (Paruk et al., 2013, 2015, 2009) and were treated with first-generation antipsychotic (Paruk et al., 2009). In terms of the symptoms of psychosis or schizophrenia, auditory hallucinations (47%) were the most occurring positive symptom, followed by delusions (33%), disorganized behavior (18%) and visual hallucinations (13%) (Paruk et al., 2015). Among school samples from Kenya, it was observed that individuals endorsing psychotic experience were significantly less likely to report symptoms of ADHD, major depression, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorder (Mamah et al., 2016). This suggests that the presence of these disorders may be markers of underlying pathology that may be independent of the likelihood of developing psychosis (Mamah et al., 2016). 2.5. Substance misuse and psychosis The relationship between substance use disorders and psychosis has received attention from mental health researchers and practitioners. The conclusion reached by studies conducted in Western countries suggests that the prevalence of substance misuse is higher among persons diagnosed with schizophrenia and other psychotic-spectrum disorders than in the general population (Tandon & Shariff, 2019). A meta-analysis of 10 studies revealed that higher levels of cannabis use were associated with increased risk for psychosis(Marconi et al., 2016). This review identified four studies on substance misuse and psychosis conducted among indivi- duals diagnosed with psychosis in South Africa. In an earlier study of 70 participants, 50% reportedly smoked nicotine, 61.4% used cannabis and 41.4% used alcohol (Paruk et al., 2009). Paruk et al. (2013) also found that 68.8% of 45 patients with first-episode psychosis reported a history of lifetime cannabis use, with no significant difference in pattern of use between those diagnosed with schizophrenia and other forms of psychosis. Consistent with the trend above, Paruk et al. (2018) found that adolescents diagnosed with early onset psychosis were motivated to use cannabis frequently, compared with healthy controls. Emerging evidence further suggests that most adolescents (96%) reported initiation of cannabis use before the onset of their first positive psychotic symptoms (Paruk et al., 2015). Lastly, males have been found to be significantly more likely than their female counterparts to report lifetime canna- bis, alcohol and nicotine use/misuse (Paruk et al., 2015). 2.6. “Psychosis Literacy” and help-seeking behavior “Psychosis literacy”, operationalized as knowledge and recognition of symptoms of psychosis is critical to early identification, help-seeking behavior and ultimately the course and prognosis of psychotic disorders. Two studies reported data on this theme. A study conducted in South Africa revealed that only 51% of caregivers or adolescents were able to recognize the prodromal symptoms of psychosis such as suspiciousness, restlessness, mood changes, trouble thinking and social withdrawal (Paruk et al., 2015). With respect to help seeking, Mamah et al. (2013) reported that only 8.8 and 23.1% males and females in Kenya who were symptomatic for psychosis sought for help, respectively. According to a South African-based study, more than half of caregivers and patients who sought help first and foremost consulted traditional healers, followed by orthodox treatment or services (Paruk et al., 2015). This finding is largely consistent with the pathway to seeking mental healthcare in Africa (Burns & Tomita, 2015; Ibrahim et al., 2016). Page 9 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 2.7. Discussion This review is the first attempt to synthesize the existing literature on psychosis among adolescents in Africa. As noted previously, the review was undertaken to understand current developments and more importantly propose a research agenda on psychosis in adolescents in Africa. First, there is paucity of empirical studies on psychosis among adolescents in Africa. Only 11 studies, mostly from South Africa and Kenya, were included in this review, with the findings partly supporting and contra- dicting existing studies from high Western countries. To illustrate, the prevalence rates of psychosis reported by the studies reviewed here appeared lower than those reported by studies conducted in high-income countries, including Australia, Spain, (Fonseca-Pedrero et al., 2011; Kelleher & Cannon, 2011; Laurens et al., 2012; Yung et al., 2009). On the other hand, the finding relating to high perceptual disturbances in Kenya sample support previous studies, while also contradicting others who found delusional experiences to be more among adolescents (Mamah et al., 2013). The classification of participants from Kenya into clusters, based on their endorsement of psychotic symptoms, is largely consistent with the findings obtained from New Zealand (Gale et al., 2011) and United States (Shevlin et al., 2007). This suggests some commonality in the representation of psychotic symptoms across cultures. Although there is a trend suggesting that males are more likely to endorse psychotic symptoms than females (Barajas et al., 2015), the studies from Kenya have yielded inconsistent results partly due to differences between the samples (students versus slum dwellers) which might affect the conceptualization, measurement and threshold of endorsement of psychotic symptoms. The finding suggesting that demographic factors such as poor socioeconomic background, family history of psychosis strongly correlate with psychosis in South Africa is largely consistent with the trend in the literature (Cantor-Graae & Selten, 2005; Kirkbride et al., 2017; Sweeney et al., 2015). Moreover, consistent with the findings of the extant cross-cultural literature (Barnett et al., 2007; Carney et al., 2017), the review found evidence of substance abuse among adolescents diagnosed with psychosis or endorse psychotic symptoms in Africa. Finally, the review corroborates the general trend in the literature suggesting poor mental health literacy among the populace and service users (Lam, 2014; Zorrilla et al., 2019). More importantly, notwithstanding the somewhat similarity in the findings of this review and studies conducted elsewhere on different topical areas, such as demographic and clinical corre- lates of psychosis, as noted previously, the small number of studies from the African region has hampered cross-cultural discussions on psychosis among adolescents. Similarly, although the sociocultural differences among the 54 countries in Africa provide a unique opportunity for inter- country comparison on psychotic characteristics, this was not possible in the current review because of the lack studies from several other African countries. Meanwhile, the existing studies from South Africa and Kenya have also examined different facets of psychosis, therefore making the results difficult to compare. For example, studies from Kenya focused predominantly on the cultural appropriateness and usefulness of psychosis screening measures, as well as prevalence of psychosis in non-clinical samples (Mamah et al., 2012, 2016, 2013, 2014; Owoso et al., 2018, 2014), as opposed to the demographic and clinical profiling of individuals diagnosed with psychosis in South Africa (Paruk et al., 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2009). This review has largely corroborated early suggestion that mental health in general (Charlson et al., 2014; Cortina et al., 2012; Sipsma et al., 2013) and mental health research in particular (Sankoh et al., 2018; Ssewamala et al., 2018) has been granted scant attention in Africa for reasons such budgetary constraints (Chisholm et al., 2019) and limited human resource (Cortina et al., 2012; Roberts et al., 2014; Sankoh et al., 2018). In their review of publications from Africa in Lancet Global Health, Sankoh et al. (2018) found that a search for “mental health disorders” in Africa produces just 16 items, whereas Cortina et al. (2012) investigations into the prevalence of mental health problems in individuals aged up to 16 years in Sub-Saharan Africa yielded only 10 eligible studies. Given the contribution of mental disorders to disability adjusted life years recorded in Africa (Ferrari et al., 2013; Sankoh et al., 2018; Vos et al., 2015), there is a pressing need for a strong research agenda to inform Page 10 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 and drive research into mental health problems, including psychosis, to provide empirical evidence pertinent to ensuring enhanced treatment outcomes and better quality of life (Paruk et al., 2009). 2.8. Agenda for research into psychosis in Africa In addition to increased research into the thematic areas covered in the review, the following research areas have been proposed to advance knowledge and understanding of psychosis and its management in Africa. The first area relates to the expression or representation of psychosis. Because sociocultural factors significantly influence the expression of pathological and non- pathological behavioral repertoire, it would be insightful to investigate how the behaviors indexing psychosis are expressed in Africa. For examples, others have opined that delusions/hallucinations with religious content are highly prevalent in Africa mainly because of the dominance and sub- scription to various religious faith, including the demonology (Campbell et al., 2017). Therefore, to enhance cross-cultural discourse while providing increased understanding of psychopathologies in Africa, it is pertinent not only to examine the similarities in the expression of psychosis by super- imposing existing nomenclature (Mamah et al., 2012, 2013), but more importantly to uncover developments that are unique to Africa setting. A mixed-method research approach, involving both qualitative and quantitative data gathering and analysis techniques, would help to illuminate culture-specific nuances in relation to the representation of psychosis. The second is concerned with risk and protective factors of psychosis. Meta-analytic studies focusing on Western-based studies have established strong association between adverse events and psychosis (Davies et al., 2020; Oliver et al., 2020; Rodrigues & Anderson, 2017). It was mentioned earlier that Africa is notably riddled with life adversities, such as conflict, child maltreatment and abuse, malnutrition, and harmful sociocultural practices such as female genital mutilation that are detrimental to the health and wellbeing of an individual. Therefore, it would be interesting to expand the existing scholarship in Africa by elucidating the influence of adversities across different phases of life in the development and expression of psychotic experiences using complementary research designs, including those involving biological assessment measures such as brain anatomy and physiology, genomics, electrophysiology, and blood-based markers. Doing this would help to facilitate multimodal biomarker approaches for psychosis risk stratification, isolate stable trait marker for psychosis, as well as predict clinical trajectories or outcomes. It should be noted, however, that not all individuals exposed to risk factors develop psychosis or more broadly psychopathologies. Protective factors, therefore, have the tendency to moderate or mediate the relationship between risk factors and psychosis, or act independent of risk factors to minimize the development of maladaptive and psychopathological behaviors (De Vries Robbé et al., 2015). Consistent with the biosocial approach to understanding psychopathological behaviors (Connolly & Beaver, 2014), research should explore protective factors of psychosis culled from biological (e.g., neurocognitive functioning, genetics) and psychosocial domains (resilience trait, social support). It will also be insightful to investigate how the usefulness of these factors can be maximized to mitigate the debilitating effects of the various risk factors of psychosis, as well as their mechanisms of action. Lastly, research is needed on the prevention and management of psychosis. In several African countries, treatment for mental health problems is sought from different and sometimes competing sources, notably mental health institutions and traditional settings (herbalist, spiritualist) in a process termed as “treatment pluralism”. The treatment-seeking trajectory can be sequential, parallel or both. In the sequential treatment pluralism, treatment seeking begins mostly at traditional settings that are operated by herbalists and other spiritualist, namely religious leaders and leaders of tradi- tional faith (e.g., priest of shrine). Cases mostly come to the attention of mental health institutions when the herbalists and spiritualists are unable to provide cure. For example, Mamah et al. (2016) reported that half of their participants and their caregivers reportedly consulted a traditional/spiritual healer first before accessing formal mental health services. Because of the delay in the treatment seeking process, most people utilizing this pathway tend to present significant impaired mental states that pose significant challenge to their recovery and wellbeing. The parallel pathway, on the other hand, involves the utilization of the services provided at the traditional settings and mental health Page 11 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 institutions concurrently. As suggested by others (Audet et al., 2017; Paruk et al., 2015), research into the factors influencing the choice of treatment modality and the impact of the various treatment modalities on recovery from mental health problems and psychosis would be helpful in decision making regarding the choice between parallel or sequential treatment model of mental health. Other areas of interest include the acceptance, satisfaction, and challenges with the parallel or sequential treatment modalities. Clinical trials are particularly attractive to investigate the short-, medium- and long-term outcome of the various treatment options on the continent. Research is also needed to uncover the nature and characteristics of the treatment rendered to patients diagnosed with psy- chotic illnesses or those endorsing high rates of psychotic symptoms. In addition to focusing on the existing treatment modalities on the Africa continent, studies are invited to adapt existing interven- tions that have proven effective in Western countries. Notably among them are cognitive-behavior therapy and family intervention (Mehl et al., 2015; Rathod et al., 2010), Mindfulness interventions (Khoury et al., 2013) and social skills training(Turner et al., 2014). To improve public mental health and prevent the development of psychosis, studies have suggested that psychological (e.g., cognitive behavior therapy), nutritional (e.g., omega-3 fatty acids), or combination or two or more treatment modalities are promising (Stafford et al., 2013). Research exploring the effectiveness of a range of interventions, including those listed above, at the population level is extremely important to con- tribute to reducing the burden of mental health problems in Africa. 2.9. Conclusions Research into psychosis in adolescents in Africa is among the surest ways to develop the needed evidence-base to address the prevalence of psychosis and its associated burden in this population. There is the need to systematically increase the number of studies exploring different but salient aspects of psychosis in Africa. Capacity building through collaborative research partnership with researchers from well-resourced research centers and institutions will position African-based researchers to investigate salient issues pertaining to psychosis in adolescents. An African-led collaborative partnership would facilitate bilateral flow of technical expertise pertinent to launch- ing a successful and robust research agenda on psychosis (Breuer et al., 2019). Funding Psychology, 54(3), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ The authors received no direct funding for this research. ijop.12468 Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards Author details a methodological framework. International Journal of Samuel Adjorlolo1,2 Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi. E-mail: sadjorlolo@ug.edu.gh org/10.1080/1364557032000119616 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9308-6031 Audet, C. M., Ngobeni, S., Graves, E., & Wagner, R. G. (2017). Mawuko Setordzi2 Mixed methods inquiry into traditional healers’ treat- 1 Department of Mental Health, School of Nursing and ment of mental, neurological and substance abuse dis- Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, University of orders in rural South Africa. PloS One, 12(12), e0188433. Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188433 2 Research and Grant Institute of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. Barajas, A., Ochoa, S., Obiols, J. E., & Lalucat-Jo, L. (2015). Gender differences in individuals at high-risk of psy- Citation information chosis: A comprehensive literature review. The Cite this article as: Psychosis in adolescents in Africa: A Scientific World Journal, 2015. https://doi.org/10. scoping review for current understanding and future 1155/2015/430735 directions, Samuel Adjorlolo & Mawuko Setordzi, Cogent Barnett, J. H., Werners, U., Secher, S. M., Hill, K. E., Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173. Brazil, R., Masson, K., Pernet, D. E., Kirkbride, J. B., Murray, G. K., & Bullmore, E. T. (2007). Substance use References in a population-based clinic sample of people with Adjorlolo, S. (2016). Diversion of individuals with mental ill- first-episode psychosis. The British Journal of ness in the criminal justice system in Ghana. Psychiatry, 190(6), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1192/ International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 15(4), bjp.bp.106.024448 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2016. Benes, F. M. (2003). Why does psychosis develop during 1209597 adolescence and early adulthood? Current Opinion in Adjorlolo, S. (2018). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and Psychiatry, 16(3), 317–319. https://doi.org/10.1097/ specificity of executive function tests in moderate 01.yco.0000069087.26384.16 traumatic brain injury in Ghana. Assessment, 25(4), Breuer, E., Hanlon, C., Bhana, A., Chisholm, D., De Silva, M., 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/ Fekadu, A., Honikman, S., Jordans, M., Kathree, T., 1073191116646445 Kigozi, F., Luitel, N. P., Marx, M., Medhin, G., Murhar, V., Adjorlolo, S., & Watt, B. D. (2019). Factorial and conver- Ndyanabangi, S., Patel, V., Petersen, I., Prince, M., gent validity of the youth psychopathic traits inven- Raja, S., Rathod, S. D., & Lund, C. (2019). Partnerships in tory-short version in Ghana. International Journal of a global mental health research Programme—the Page 12 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 example of prime. Global Social Welfare, 6(3), 159–175. burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Medicine, 10(11), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-018-0128-6 e1001547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed. Burns, J. K., & Tomita, A. (2015). Traditional and religious 1001547 healers in the pathway to care for people with men- Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Santaren-Rosell, M., Lemos-Giráldez, S., tal disorders in Africa: A systematic review and Paino, M., Sierra-Baigrie, S., & Muniz, J. (2011). Psychotic- meta-analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric like experiences in the adolescent general population. Epidemiology, 50(6), 867–877. https://doi.org/10. Actas Espanolas De Psiquiatria, 39(3), 155–162. https:// 1007/s00127-014-0989-7 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21560075/ Campbell, M. M., Sibeko, G., Mall, S., Baldinger, A., Fusar-Poli, P., Borgwardt, S., Bechdolf, A., Addington, J., Nagdee, M., Susser, E., & Stein, D. J. (2017). The con- Riecher-Rössler, A., Schultze-Lutter, F., Keshavan, M., tent of delusions in a sample of South African Xhosa Wood, S., Ruhrmann, S., Seidman, L. J., Valmaggia, L., people with schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 41. Cannon, T., Velthorst, E., De Haan, L., Cornblatt, B., https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1196-3 Bonoldi, I., Birchwood, M., McGlashan, T., Cantor-Graae, E., & Selten, J.-P. (2005). Schizophrenia and Carpenter, W., McGorry, P., & Yung, A. (2013). The migration: A meta-analysis and review. American psychosis high-risk state: A comprehensive state-of- Journal of Psychiatry, 162(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/ the-art review. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(1), 107–120. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.1.12 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.269 Carney, R., Yung, A., Amminger, G., Bradshaw, T., Gaebel, W., & Zielasek, J. (2015). Focus on psychosis. Glozier, N., Hermens, D., Hickie, I., Killackey, E., Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 17(1), 9–18. McGorry, P., Pantelis, C., Wood, S. J., & Purcell, R. doi:10.31887/DCNS.2015.17.1/wgaebel (2017). Substance use in youth at risk for psychosis. Gale, C., Wells, J., McGee, M., & Oakley Browne, M. (2011). Schizophrenia Research, 181, 23–29. https://doi.org/ A latent class analysis of psychosis-like experiences 10.1016/j.schres.2016.08.026 in the New Zealand mental health survey. Acta Charlson, F. J., Diminic, S., Lund, C., Degenhardt, L., Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 124(3), 205–213. https:// Whiteford, H. A., & Li, S. (2014). Mental and sub- doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01707.x stance use disorders in sub-Saharan Africa: Holtzman, C., Trotman, H., Goulding, S., Ryan, A., Predictions of epidemiological changes and mental Macdonald, A., Shapiro, D., Brasfield, J., & Walker, E. health workforce requirements for the next 40 years. (2013). Stress and neurodevelopmental processes in the PloS One, 9(10), e110208. https://doi.org/10.1371/ emergence of psychosis. Neuroscience, 249, 172–191. journal.pone.0110208 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.017 Chisholm, D., Docrat, S., Abdulmalik, J., Alem, A., Ibrahim, A., Hor, S., Bahar, O. S., Dwomoh, D., McKay, M. M., Gureje, O., Gurung, D., Hanlon, C., Jordans, M. J., Esena, R. K., & Agyepong, I. A. (2016). Pathways to Kangere, S., Kigozi, F., Mugisha, J., Muke, S., psychiatric care for mental disorders: A retrospective Olayiwola, S., Shidhaye, R., Thornicroft, G., & Lund, C. study of patients seeking mental health services at (2019). Mental health financing challenges, opportu- a public psychiatric facility in Ghana. International nities and strategies in low- and middle-income Journal of Mental Health Systems, 10(1), 63. https://doi. countries: Findings from the Emerald project. BJPsych org/10.1186/s13033-016-0095-1 Open, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2019.24 Kelleher, I., & Cannon, M. (2011). Psychotic-like experiences in Connolly, E. J., & Beaver, K. M. (2014). Examining the the general population: Characterizing a high-risk group genetic and environmental influences on self-control for psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 41(1), 1–6. https:// and delinquency: Results from a genetically infor- doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710001005 mative analysis of sibling pairs. Journal of Kelleher, I., Keeley, H., Corcoran, P., Lynch, F., Interpersonal Violence, 29(4), 707–735. https://doi. Fitzpatrick, C., Devlin, N., Molloy, C., Roddy, S., org/10.1177/0886260513505209 Clarke, M. C., Harley, M., Arseneault, L., Cortina, M. A., Sodha, A., Fazel, M., & Ramchandani, P. G. Wasserman, C., Carli, V., Sarchiapone, M., Hoven, C., (2012). Prevalence of child mental health problems in Wasserman, D., & Cannon, M. (2012). sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Archives of Clinicopathological significance of psychotic experi- Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166(3), 276–281. ences in non-psychotic young people: Evidence from https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.592 four population-based studies. The British Journal of Cosgrave, C., Malatzky, C., & Gillespie, J. (2019). Social Psychiatry, 201(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp. determinants of rural health workforce retention: bp.111.101543 A scoping review. International Journal of Kendler, K. S. (2020). A prehistory of the diathesis-stress Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), 314. model: Predisposing and exciting causes of insanity https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030314 in the 19th century. American Journal of Psychiatry, Davies, C., Segre, G., Estradé, A., Radua, J., De Micheli, A., 177(7), 576–588. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp. Provenzani, U., Oliver, D., De Pablo, G. S., Ramella- 2020.19111213 Cravaro, V., Besozzi, M., Dazzan, P., Miele, M., Khoury, B., Lecomte, T., Gaudiano, B. A., & Paquin, K. (2013). Caputo, G., Spallarossa, C., Crossland, G., Ilyas, A., Mindfulness interventions for psychosis: A Spada, G., Politi, P., Murray, R. M., McGuire, P., & Fusar- meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 150(1), Poli, P. (2020). Prenatal and perinatal risk and pro- 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.055 tective factors for psychosis: A systematic review and Kirkbride, J. B., Hameed, Y., Ioannidis, K., meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(5), 399–410. Ankireddypalli, G., Crane, C. M., Nasir, M., Kabacs, N., https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30057-2 Metastasio, A., Jenkins, O., Espandian, A., Spyridi, S., De Vries Robbé, M., Mann, R. E., Maruna, S., & Thornton, D. Ralevic, D., Siddabattuni, S., Walden, B., Adeoye, A., (2015). An exploration of protective factors supporting Perez, J., & Jones, P. B. (2017). Ethnic minority status, desistance from sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 27(1), age-at-immigration and psychosis risk in rural envir- 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214547582 onments: Evidence from the SEPEA study. Ferrari, A. J., Charlson, F. J., Norman, R. E., Patten, S. B., Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43(6), 1251–1261. https://doi. Freedman, G., Murray, C. J., Vos, T., Whiteford, H. A., & org/10.1093/schbul/sbx010 Hay, P. J. (2013). Burden of depressive disorders by Lam, L. T. (2014). Mental health literacy and mental country, sex, age, and year: Findings from the global health status in adolescents: A population-based Page 13 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 survey. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental (4), 703–715. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals. Health, 8(1), 1–8 schbul.a007040 Larsen, T. K., Melle, I., Friss, S., Joa, I., Johannessen, J. O., Moleiro, C. (2018). Culture and psychopathology: New Opjordsmoen, S., Simonsen, E., Vaglum, P., & perspectives on research, practice, and clinical train- McGlashan, T. H. (2007). One-year effect of changing ing in a globalized world. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, duration of untreated psychosis in a single catchment 366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00366 area. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(S51), s128– Ndetei, D. M., Muriungi, S. K., Owoso, A., Mutiso, V. N., s132. Mbwayo, A. W., Khasakhala, L. I., Barch, D. M., & Laurens, K. R., Hobbs, M., Sunderland, M., Green, M. J., & Mamah, D. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of Mould, G. (2012). Psychotic-like experiences in psychotic-like experiences in Kenyan youth. a community sample of 8000 children aged 9 to 11 Psychiatry Research, 196(2–3), 235–242. https://doi. years: An item response theory analysis. org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.053 Psychological Medicine, 42(7), 1495–1506. https://doi. Okewole, A. O., Awhangansi, S. S., Fasokun, M., org/10.1017/S0033291711002108 Adeniji, A. A., Omotoso, O., & Ajogbon, D. (2015). Linscott, R., & Van Os, J. (2013). An updated and conser- Prodromal psychotic symptoms and psychological vative systematic review and meta-analysis of epi- distress among secondary school students in demiological evidence on psychotic experiences in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Journal of Child and Adolescent children and adults: On the pathway from proneness Mental Health, 27(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10. to persistence to dimensional expression across 2989/17280583.2015.1125906 mental disorders. Psychological Medicine, 43(6), Okewole, A. O., Ogunwale, A., Mosanya, T. J., & Ojo, B. M. 1133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291712001626 (2016). A 12 year chart review of childhood and Loewy, R. L., Pearson, R., Vinogradov, S., Bearden, C. E., & adolescent onset psychosis at a Nigerian tertiary Cannon, T. D. (2011). Psychosis risk screening with mental health facility. Journal of Child and the Prodromal Questionnaire — Brief Version (PQ-B). Adolescent Mental Health, 28(3), 189–197. https://doi. Schizophrenia Research, 129(1), 42–46. https://doi. org/10.2989/17280583.2016.1245194 org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.03.029 Oliver, D., Reilly, T. J., Baccaredda Boy, O., Petros, N., Mamah, D., Mbwayo, A., Mutiso, V., Barch, D. M., Davies, C., Borgwardt, S., McGuire, P., & Fusar-Poli, P. Constantino, J. N., Nsofor, T., Khasakhala, L., & (2020). What causes the onset of psychosis in indi- Ndetei, D. M. (2012). A survey of psychosis risk symp- viduals at clinical high risk? A meta-analysis of risk toms in Kenya. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53(5), and protective factors. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 46(1), 516–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.08. 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbz039 003 Owoso, A., Jansen, S., Ndetei, D., Musau, A., Mutiso, V., Mamah, D., Musau, A., Mutiso, V. N., Owoso, A., Mudenge, C., Ngirababyeyi, A., Gasovya, A., & Abdallah, A. B., Cottler, L. B., Striley, C. W., Mamah, D. (2018). A comparative study of psychotic Walker, E. F., & Ndetei, D. M. (2016). Characterizing and affective symptoms in Rwandan and Kenyan psychosis risk traits in Africa: A longitudinal study of students. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 27 Kenyan adolescents. Schizophrenia Research, 176(2– (2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/ 3), 340–348. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.08.004 S2045796016001074 Mamah, D., Owoso, A., Mbwayo, A. W., Mutiso, V. N., Owoso, A., Ndetei, D. M., Mbwayo, A. W., Mutiso, V. N., Muriungi, S. K., Khasakhala, L. I., Barch, D. M., & Khasakhala, L. I., & Mamah, D. (2014). Validation of Ndetei, D. M. (2013). Classes of psychotic experiences a modified version of the PRIME screen for in Kenyan children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry psychosis-risk symptoms in a non-clinical Kenyan youth and Human Development, 44(3), 452–459. https://doi. sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(2), 380–387. org/10.1007/s10578-012-0339-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.10.004 Mamah, D., Owoso, A., Sheffield, J. M., & Bayer, C. (2014). Palmer, B. A., Pankratz, V. S., & Bostwick, J. M. (2005). The The WERCAP Screen and the WERC Stress Screen: lifetime risk of suicide in schizophrenia: A Psychometrics of self-rated instruments for assessing reexamination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(3), bipolar and psychotic disorder risk and perceived stress 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.3.247 burden. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(7), 1757–1771. Paruk, S., Burns, J. K., & Caplan, R. (2013). Cannabis use https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.07.004 and family history in adolescent first episode psy- Marconi, A., Di Forti, M., Lewis, C. M., Murray, R. M., & chosis in Durban, South Africa. Journal of Child and Vassos, E. (2016). Meta-analysis of the association Adolescent Mental Health, 25(1), 61–68. https://doi. between the level of cannabis use and risk of org/10.2989/17280583.2013.767264 psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 42(5), 1262–1269. Paruk, S., Jhazbhay, K., Singh, K., Sartorius, B., & Burns, J. K. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw003 (2015). Clinical correlates of first episode early onset Mehl, S., Werner, D., & Lincoln, T. M. (2015). Does psychosis in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 27(2), 103–111. show a sustainable effect on delusions? A https://doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2015.1080710 meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1450. Paruk, S., Jhazbhay, K., Singh, K., Sartorius, B., & Burns, J. K. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01450 (2017). The clinical impact of a positive family history Messias, E. L., Chen, C.-Y., & Eaton, W. W. (2007). of psychosis or mental illness in psychotic and Epidemiology of schizophrenia: Review of findings non-psychotic mentally ill adolescents. Journal of Child and myths. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 30(3), and Adolescent Mental Health, 29(3), 219–229. https:// 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2007.04.007 doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2017.1389741 Miller, T. J., McGlashan, T. H., Rosen, J. L., Cadenhead, K., Paruk, S., Jhazbhay, K., Singh, K., Sartorius, B., & Ventura, J., McFarlane, W., Perkins, D. O., Burns, J. K. (2018). A comparative study of socio- Pearlson, G. D., & Woods, S. W. (2003). Prodromal demographic and substance use correlates in early- assessment with the structured interview for pro- onset psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 12 dromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal (3), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12330 symptoms: Predictive validity, interrater reliability, Paruk, S., Ramlall, S., & Burns, J. (2009). Adolescent Onset and training to reliability. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29 Psychosis: A 2-year retrospective study of Page 14 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 adolescents admitted to a general psychiatric unit. the second Australian national survey of psychosis. South African Journal of Psychiatry, 15(4), 7. https:// Frontiers in Public Health, 3, 259. https://doi.org/10. doi.org/org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v15i4.203 3389/fpubh.2015.00259 Patel, P. K., Leathem, L. D., Currin, D. L., & Karlsgodt, K. H. Tandon, R., & Shariff, S. M. (2019). Substance-induced (2020). Adolescent neurodevelopment and vulnerabil- psychotic disorders and schizophrenia: ity to psychosis. Biological Psychiatry, 89(2), 184–193. Pathophysiological Insights and Clinical Implications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.06.028 The American Journal of Psychiatry, 176(9), 683–684. Rathod, S., Kingdon, D., Phiri, P., & Gobbi, M. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070734 Developing culturally sensitive cognitive behaviour Turner, D. T., van der Gaag, M., Karyotaki, E., & Cuijpers, P. therapy for psychosis for ethnic minority patients by (2014). Psychological interventions for psychosis: A exploration and incorporation of service users‘ and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. health professionals‘ views and opinions. Behavioural American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(5), 523–538. and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38(5), 511–533. https:// https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13081159 doi.org/10.1017/S1352465810000378 Van Os, J., Linscott, R. J., Myin-Germeys, I., Delespaul, P., & Roberts, M., Mogan, C., & Asare, J. B. (2014). An overview of Krabbendam, L. (2009). A systematic review and meta- Ghana’s mental health system: Results from an assess- analysis of the psychosis continuum: Evidence for ment using the World Health Organization’s assessment a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model instrument for mental health systems (WHO-AIMS). of psychotic disorder. Psychological Medicine, 39(2), International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 8(1), 16. 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708003814 https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-8-16 Ventevogel, P., Jordans, M., Reis, R., & de Jong, J. (2013). Rodrigues, R., & Anderson, K. K. (2017). The traumatic Madness or sadness? Local concepts of mental ill- experience of first-episode psychosis: A systematic ness in four conflict-affected African communities. review and meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 189, Conflict and Health, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/ 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2017.01.045 1752-1505-7-3 Ronald, A., Sieradzka, D., Cardno, A. G., Haworth, C. M., Vos, T., Barber, R. M., Bell, B., Bertozzi-Villa, A., Biryukov, S., McGuire, P., & Freeman, D. (2013). Characterization of Bolliger, I., Charlson, F., Davis, A., Degenhardt, L., & psychotic experiences in adolescence using the spe- Dicker, D. (2015). Global, regional, and national inci- cific psychotic experiences questionnaire: Findings dence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for from a study of 5000 16-year-old twins. 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(4), 868–877. https://doi. countries, 1990–2013: A systematic analysis for the org/10.1093/schbul/sbt106 Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet, 386 Saha, S., Chant, D., & McGrath, J. (2007). A systematic (9995), 743–800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15) review of mortality in schizophrenia: Is the differen- 60692-4 tial mortality gap worsening over time? Archives of Walker, E. R., McGee, R. E., & Druss, B. G. (2015). Mortality General Psychiatry, 64(10), 1123–1131. https://doi. in mental disorders and global disease burden org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1123 implications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sankoh, O., Sevalie, S., & Weston, M. (2018). Mental health JAMA Psychiatry, 72(4), 334–341. https://doi.org/10. in Africa. The Lancet Global Health, 6(9), e954. https:// 1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2502 doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30303-6 Welsh, P., & Tiffin, P. A. (2014). The ‘At-risk mental state’ Shevlin, M., Murphy, J., Dorahy, M. J., & Adamson, G. (2007). for psychosis in adolescents: Clinical presentation, The distribution of positive psychosis-like symptoms in transition and remission. Child Psychiatry and Human the population: A latent class analysis of the National Development, 45(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/ Comorbidity Survey. Schizophrenia Research, 89(1–3), s10578-013-0380-z 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2006.09.014 Yung, A. R., Nelson, B., Baker, K., Buckby, J. A., Sipsma, H., Ofori-Atta, A., Canavan, M., Osei-Akoto, I., Baksheev, G., & Cosgrave, E. M. (2009). Psychotic-like Udry, C., & Bradley, E. H. (2013). Poor mental health experiences in a community sample of adolescents: in Ghana: Who is at risk? BMC Public Health, 13(1), Implications for the continuum model of psychosis 288. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-288 and prediction of schizophrenia. Australian & New Ssewamala, F. M., Bahar, O. S., McKay, M. M., Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(2), 118–128. https:// Hoagwood, K., Huang, K.-Y., & Pringle, B. (2018). doi.org/10.1080/00048670802607188 Strengthening mental health and research training in Zavos, H. M., Freeman, D., Haworth, C. M., McGuire, P., Sub-Saharan Africa (SMART Africa): Uganda study Plomin, R., Cardno, A. G., & Ronald, A. (2014). protocol. Trials, 19(1), 423. https://doi.org/org/10. Consistent etiology of severe, frequent psychotic 1186/s13063-018-2751-z experiences and milder, less frequent manifesta- Stafford, M. R., Jackson, H., Mayo-Wilson, E., tions: A twin study of specific psychotic experiences Morrison, A. P., & Kendall, T. (2013). Early interven- in adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry, 71(9), 1049–1057. tions to prevent psychosis: Systematic review and https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.994 meta-analysis. BMJ, 346(jan18 1), f185–f185. https:// Ziermans, T. B., Schothorst, P. F., Schnack, H. G., doi.org/org/10.1136/bmj.f185 Koolschijn, P. C. M., Kahn, R. S., van Engeland, H., & Subramaniam, M., Abdin, E., Vaingankar, J., Verma, S., & Durston, S. (2012). Progressive structural brain Chong, S. (2014). Latent structure of psychosis in the changes during development of psychosis. general population: Results from the Singapore Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38(3), 519–530. https://doi. mental health study. Psychological Medicine, 44(1), org/10.1093/schbul/sbq113 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713000688 Zorrilla, M. M., Modeste, N., Gleason, P. C., Sealy, D. A., Banta, J. Sweeney, S., Air, T., Zannettino, L., & Galletly, C. (2015). E., & Trieu, S. L. (2019). Assessing depression-related Psychosis, socioeconomic disadvantage, and health mental health literacy among young adults. Californian service use in South Australia: Findings from Journal of Health Promotion, 17(1), 71–83 Page 15 of 16 Adjorlolo & Setordzi, Cogent Psychology (2021), 8: 1949173 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1949173 © 2021 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Cogent Psychology (ISSN: 2331-1908) is published by Cogent OA, part of Taylor & Francis Group. Publishing with Cogent OA ensures: • Immediate, universal access to your article on publication • High visibility and discoverability via the Cogent OA website as well as Taylor & Francis Online • Download and citation statistics for your article • Rapid online publication • Input from, and dialog with, expert editors and editorial boards • Retention of full copyright of your article • Guaranteed legacy preservation of your article • Discounts and waivers for authors in developing regions Submit your manuscript to a Cogent OA journal at www.CogentOA.com Page 16 of 16