PROPAGATION, FORAGE PRODUCTION AND FORAGE QUALITY OF SOME GHANAIAN BROWSE PLANTS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF GRADUATE STUDIES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON BY ALBERT ADDO-KWAFO IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SCIENCE FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA LEGON FEBRUARY, 1996 ( S . 347479 ' SB \^Z ' I 6-3 Ad °L DECLARATION I hereby declare that this is an original Research work carried out and completed by Albert Addo-Kwafo with exception of other people’s work which has been duly cited, and that this Thesis either in whole or in part, has not been presented for another degree anywhere else. Albert Addo-Kwafo (Student) i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work has been possible through the grace, love, mercy, wisdom^as^gniaance of the Almighty Lord without whom it could not have materialised. I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisors, Prof, F.K. Fianu and Dr. J.E. Fleischer, for their guidance as well as their constructive criticism in the preparation of this thesis. I also want to thank Dr. I.K. Ofori of the Crop Science Department for offering useful advice throughout the course of the study. Sincere thanks go to Dr. A. Naazie for helping with the statistical analysis of the data and the drawing of graphs. I am indebted to Mr. J.R. Amoah for his assistance in many ways, and Mr. Yacubu Abukari, the Chief Technician of the Nutrition Laboratory, Department of Animal Science for his immense help in the analysis of the forage samples. I wish to thank Mr. Budu- Biney for helping with the In sacco degradability of the forage samples. Grateful acknowledgement are made to all the lecturers in the Animal Science Department for their love, help and encouragement during the study period. Many workers of the Departments of Animal Science and Crop Science and the Animal Research Institute (ARI) showed kindness and support in many ways but most importantly during forage sampling exercises. Special thanks go to Mr. J.K. Ennin for taking his time to type the scripts, lastly but not the least, I like to thank the National Agricultural Research Project (NARP), the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) and the Animal Research Institute (ARI) for sponsoring me for the programme. DEDICATION Dedicated to my lovely Wife, Mrs. Evelyn Adubea Addo-Kwafo, and my children: Chief Kwaasi Addo-Kwafo, Akua Kyekye Addo-kwafo and Nana Akomobea Addo-Kwafo for toiling day and night to sustain me during the course of the study. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DECLARATION..................................... - ... r . . . . i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................. ii DEDICATION................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................iv LIST OF T A B L E S ............................................. viii LIST OF FIGURES............................................... ix A B S T R A C T ......................................................xi Chapter 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................. 1 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................... 3 2.1 HERBAGE PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT RECYCLING ............. 3 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF BROWSE PLANTS ............... 6 2.3 FACTORS INFLUENCING PRODUCTIVITY AND SURVIVAL OF BROWSE P L A N T S .................................. 7 2.3.1 Climatic factors ................................... 7 2.3.2 Biotic factors ..................................... 9 2.4 METHODS OF PROPAGATION OF BROWSE PLANTS ............... 10 2.4.1 Seed propagation and factors affecting seed germination......................................... 10 2.4.1.1 Dormancy as a factor affecting seed germination . . 10 2.4.1.2 Methods of breaking seed dormancy................... 11 2.4.1.2.1 Mechanical scarification........................... 12 2.4.1.2.2 Chemical scarification............................. 12 2. 4.1.2.3 Heat treatment..................................... 13 2.4.1.2.3.1 Hot water treatment........................13 2 .4 .1. 2 .3 . 2 Dry heat treatment..........................13 2.4.1.2.4 "After ripening" in dry storage................ 14 2.4.2 Vegetative propagation ......................... 14 2.5 MANAGEMENT OF BROWSE PLANTS ......................... 15 2.6 PLANT GROWTH ANALYSIS ................................ 17 2.7 EVALUATION OF FEED QUALITY OF BROWSE P L A N T S ...............19 2.7.1 Percentage crude protein ........................ 19 2.7.2 Cell wall constituents...........................2 0 2.7.3 Mineral content..................................... 22 2.7.4 In vitro dry matter digestibility................... 23 2.7.5 In sacco degradability............................. 24 2.8 TOXIC PRINCIPLES IN BROWSE PLANTS ................... ! 27 3.0 EXPERIMENT ONE ...................................29 3.1 INTRODUCTION........................................... ’ 29 3.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS '................................ 2 9 3 .3 R E S U L T S ................................................. 31 3.4 DISCUSSION............................................... 3S 4.0 EXPERIMENT T W O ........................................ 4 0 4.1 INTRODUCTION........................................ 4 0 4.2 MATERIALS AND M E T H O D S ...................................41 4.3 R E S U L T S .............................................. ... 4.4 DISCUSSION............................................... 49 iv 5.0 EXPERIMENT THREE ...................................... 51 5.1 INTRODUCTION............................................. 51 5.2 MATERIALS AND M E T H O D S ................................... 51 5.3 R E S U L T S ................................................. 53 5.4 DISCUSSION............................................... 57 6.0 EXPERIMENT F O U R ......................................... 59 6.1 INTRODUCTION............................................. 59 6.2 MATERIALS AND M E T H O D S ................................... 60 6.3 R E S U L T S ................................................. 64 6.4 DISCUSSION............................................... 70 6.4.1 Seedling emergence ............................... 70 6.4.2 Plants survival...................................... 70 6.4.3 Plant height at 24 w e e k s ............................71 7.0 EXPERIMENT F I V E ......................................... 72 7.1 INTRODUCTION............................................. 72 7.2 MATERIALS AND M E T H O D S ................................... 72 7.2.1 Chemical analysis ................................. 73 7.2.2 In vitro dry-matter digestibility (IVDMD) ....... 73 7.2.3 In sacco CP and DM degradation of the forages . . . 73 7.2.4 Statistical analysis ............................. 75 7.3 RESULTS.................................................. 75 7.3.1 Chemical composition ............................. 75 7.3.2 In sacco DM and CP digestibility of the browse p l a n t s ..............................................97 7.4 DISCUSSION.............................................. 100 7.4.1 Chemical composition ............................. 100 7.4.2 Dry matter c o n t e n t .................................101 7.4.3 Crude protein (CP) c o n t e n t .........................102 7.4.4 Cell wall constituents (CWC) digestibility and minerals.......................................... 102 7.4.5. In sacco degradability of the forages ............. 104 8.0 GENERAL DISCUSSION .................................... 107 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.........................114 REFERENCES...............................................116 v A P P E N D I X ................................................... 13 2 1 Symbols representing the browse species used and the date of h a r v e s t ................................... 132 2 ANOVA on percentage germination of eight species of browse plants under different seed treatment . . . . 133 2a ANOVA for Cajanus c a j a n ................................. 134 2b ANOVA for Albizia lebbek................................. 134 2c ANOVA for Milettia thonningii.......................... 135 2d ANOVA for Afzelia africana ............................. 135 2e ANOVA for Pithecellobium dulce.......................... 135 2f ANOVA for Khaya senegalensis............................ 136 2g ANOVA for Grewia carpinifolia ......................... 137 2h ANOVA for Dialium guineense............................. 137 2i ANOVA for control treatment ........................... 138 2j ANOVA for warm water treatment.........................13 8 2k ANOVA for hot water treatment.........................13 9 21 ANOVA for mechanical scarification ..................... 13 9 3 ANOVA on days taken to germinate by eight species of browse plants under different seed treatment....... 140 3a ANOVA for Cajanus c a j a n ................................. 141 3b ANOVA for Albizia lebbek................................. 141 3c ANOVA for Milettia thonningii.......................... 142 3d ANOVA for Afzelia africana ............................. 142 3e ANOVA for Pithecellobium dulce.......................... 143 3f ANOVA for Khaya senegalensis ........................... 143 3g ANOVA for Grewia carpinifolia ......................... 144 3h ANOVA for Dialium guineense.............................144 3i ANOVA for C o n t r o l .......................................145 3j ANOVA for warm water treatment.......................... 145 3k ANOVA for hot water treatment......................... 14 6 31 ANOVA for mechanical scarification ..................... 146 4 ANOVA on rate of germination of eight species of browse plants under different seed treatment........... 147 4a ANOVA for Cajanus c a j a n ............................... 14 8 4b ANOVA for Albizia lebbek.................................148 4c ANOVA for Milettia thonningii.......................... 149 4d ANOVA for Afzelia africana ............................. 149 4e ANOVA for Pithecellobium dulce...........................150 4f ANOVA for Grewia carpinifolia ......................... 150 4g ANOVA for Khaya senegalensis ........................... 151 4h ANOVA for Dialium guineense.............................151 4i ANOVA for Control . . .................................. 152 4j ANOVA for warm water treatment...........................152 4k ANOVA for hot water treatment...........................153 41 ANOVA for mechanical scarification ..................... 153 vi 5 5a 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 154 154 155 156 157 158 159 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 ANOVA for leaf area determination . . . . ANOVA for dry matter accumulation . . . . ANOVA for seedling emergence ............ ANOVA for seedling survival ............ ANOVA for plant height .................. ANOVA for dry matter yield ............... ANOVA for dry matter content ANOVA for crude protein content ........ ANOVA for neutral detergent fibre (NDF) ANOVA for acid detergent fibre (ADF) . . . ANOVA for cellulose content ............ ANOVA for hemicellulose content ........ ANOVA for lignin content ................ ANOVA for calcium content .............. ANOVA for phosphorus content ............ ANOVA for magnesium content ............ ANOVA for potassium content ............ ANOVA for sodium content ................ ANOVA for zinc content .................. ANOVA for copper content ................ ANOVA for manganese content ............ ANOVA for in vitro dry matter digestibility vii Table Page 3.1 Percentage germination of eight species of browse plants under different seed treatment .......... 32 3.2 Effect of sed treatment on germination time of browse plants (days) ................................... 33 3.3 Rate of germination of browse plants under different seed treatments..........................................35 4.1 Number of seeds of browse plants that emerged' from the s o i l ............................................45 4.2 Growth rates (cm d'1) of browse plants to 30 and 60 days after planting............................................47 4.3 Leaf area development of browse plants to 2 0 weeks of growth (cm2) 47 4.4 Dry matter yield of browse plants to 20 weeks of growth ( g ) ................................................48 4.5 RGR, NAR and LAR of five browse plants to 70 days growth 49 5.1 Sprout check on cuttings 2 and 4 weeks after planting . 55 6.1 Climatic data for Legon for the experimental period, January 1993-Feb 1994 62 6.2 Percentage seedling emergence and percentage survival to 16 weeks of 5 browse plants........................... 64 6.3 Dry matter yield of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (t/ha.) 65 6.4 Stem girth (cm) of 5 browse plants at 16 and 24 weeks of g r o w t h ................................................68 7.1 Foliage dry matter content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (g/kg)................................. 76 7.2 Foliage crude protein content of 5 browse plant as influenced by age (%) 77 7.3 Fliage NDF content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age ( % ) ................................................84 7.4 Foliage ADF content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age ( % ) ................................................85 7.5 Foliage cellulose content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (%) 86 viii LIST OF TABLES 7.6 Foliage hemicellulose content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (%) 87 7.7 Foliage lignin content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (%) 88 7.8 Foliage calcium content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (%) 89 7.9 Foliage phosphorus content of 5 browse plant as influenced by age (%) 90 7.10 Foliage -potassium content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age ( % ) ................................. 91 7.11 Foliage magnesium content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (%) .................................92 7.12 Foliage sodium content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (%) 93 7.13 Foliage zinc content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (ppm) ....................................................94 7.14 Foliage copper content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (ppm) ..................................95 7.15 Foliage manganese content of 5 browse plants as influenced by age (ppm) .................................. 96 7.16 Foliage IVDMD of 5 browse plants as influenced by age ( % ) ................................................97 7.17 In sacco degradability characteristics (a, b and c) of DM and CP of browse species harvested at 6, 7 and 8 months after p l a n t i n g ............................. 98 Figure Page 4.1 Height (cm) of seven browse species during 20 weeks of growth.................................................... 44 5.1 Effect of hormone application on the growth of 4 browse plants .................................................. 56 6.1 Height (cm) of five browse species during 24 weeks of growth.................................................... 66 6.2 Development of primary branches of 4 browse species during 24 weeks of g r o w t h ................................. 6 9 7.1 In situ DM disappearance (%) from 4 selected browse plants, harvested at 6 months after planting incubated in the rumen of s h e e p ........................... 78 7.2 In situ DM disappearance (%) from 4 selected browse plants, harvested at 7 months after planting incubated in the rumen of sheep..................................................79 7.3 In situ DM disappearance (%) from 4 selected browse plants, harvested at 8 months after planting incubated in the rumen of s h e e p ................................. 8 0 7.4 In situ CP disappearance (%) from 4 selected browse plants, harvested at 6 months after planting incubated in the rumen of s h e e p .................................... 81 7.5 In situ CP disappearance (%) from 4 selected browse plants, harvested at 7 months after planting incubated in the rumen of s h e e p .................................... 82 7.6 In situ CP disappearance (%) from 4 selected browse plants, harvested at 8 months after planting incubated in the rumen of sheep..................................................83 LIST OF FIGURES x ABSTRACT Experiments were carried out to examine the ease of establishment of some native browse species through both seed and stem cuttings, the forage production from these browse species and the nutritive quality of the forage produced as livestock feed. Five experiments were therefore conducted to address the problem. Experiment I: The objective of this experiment was to test in vitro techniques for breaking the dormancy of the seed of some native browse plants. Germination tests were performed, after no treatment (control) soaking in warm water, immersion in hot water and mechanical scarification, on the seed of ten browse plants namely: Cajanus cajan, Dialium guineense, Afzelia africana, Khaya senegalensis, Grewia carpinifolia, Pithecellobium dulce, Albizia lebbek, Milettia thonningii, Baphia nitida and Griffonia simplicifolia. The experimental design was 1 0 x 4 factorial arranged in a completely randomised design with four replicates. The factors were the ten browse species and the four seed treatment methods. Percentage germination was high (54-98%) with mechanical scarification for all the species except Grewia carpinifolia and Khaya senegalensis (11-16%). The other treatments also gave high percentage germination (above 48%) with the exception of Grewia carpinifolia, Khaya senegalensis and Dialium guineense which were very low (5-41%). Number of days taken to germinate in the different browse species was significantly shorter (P<0.05) for the scarified seed than the other treatments. Regardless of the type of treatment adopted Cajanus cajan and Milettia thonningii took the same time to germinate for all the treatments (3 and 4 days respectively). Mechanical scarification reduced the number of days to germination from 13.8 to 2.3 and 12.7 to 6.3 in Albizia lebbek and Afzelia africana respectively. For Grewia carpinifolia and Dialium guinegm'4 B^tn warm and hot water treatments increased the number of days to germination. The control and mechanical scarification were similar. Species differed significantly (P<0.05) in the rate of germination. Mechanical scarification increased the rate of germination of the species more than the other treatments. Experiment II: The objective of this experiment was to study the changes in plant height with time, the relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR) and Leaf area ratio (LAR) of the browse plants. The seed of the browse plants used in Experiment I were planted in polybags and their RGR, NAR, LAR and dry matter accumulation were noted. The experimental design was a completely randomised design with 8 replicates. The RGR was highest (0.052 g g'1 d'1) in Cajanus cajan and lowest (0.021 g g'1 d'1) in Afzelia africana. The NAR ranged between (153 and 491) x 10'6 g cm'2d‘' with Cajanus cajan and Albizia lebbek accounting for the lowest and highest values respectively. LAR values ranged between 60 and 339 cm2 g'1 being lowest and highest in Pithecellobium dulce and Cajanus cajan respectively. Dry matter accumulation was highest in Cajanus cajan (280g) and lowest in Afzelia africana (4g). The NAR value of Cajanus cajan suggests that it was very poor in putting on dry material contrary to actual observation. Thus care should be taken when comparing species using their NAR values. Experiment III: The objective of this experiment was to study the sprouting ability as well as the growth rate of these native browse plants, using hardwood stem cuttings treated with a rooting hormone. Cuttings of all the browse plants mentioned in experiment I in addition to those of Spondias mombin and Ficus exasperata were planted in polybags with the aid of a rooting hormone. It was observed that, the establishment of the browse plants studied. The percentage seedling emergence was over 80% for all the species while the percentage plant survival to 16 weeks was over 78% for all the species reaching 100% in Cajanus cajan. Experiment V: The objective of this experiment was to study the feed quality of the forage produced in Experiment IV in the laboratory. The dry matter content of the species ranged between 302-703 g/kg. The dry matter yield of Afzelia africana (0.08 t/ha) was so low that enough was not available for the determination of NDF, ADF cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Average crude protein (CP) content for the six, seven and eight months period were 21.52%, 19.67% and 19.36% respectively and ranged between 14.76 - 25.00%. The calcium (Ca) content of the species ranged between 2.2-5.6% while the phosphorus (P) content ranged between 0.15 and 0.23% for all the species over the three periods. The In vitro dry matter digestibility (iVDMD) ranged from 44-63% with Cajanus cajan, the lowest value and Afzelia africana having the highest. The in situ disappearance after 48 hours of incubation for both DM and CP was in the range of 40-70% and 29-68% respectively. The most promising species for dry season supplementary feeding of ruminants from these studies were Albizia lebbek, Cajanus cajan, Milettia thonningii and Pithecellobium dulce. These forages when supplemented to ruminants especially during the dry season could play a vital role in the improvement of animal production. It is therefore suggested that very efficient management practices should be adopted in the propagation agronomy of these browse species so that enough would be available for dry season supplementary feeding. The work done so far should be extended to include studies with xiii animals so as to ascertain the voluntary intake and in vivo dry matter digestibility and animal preference. xiv CHAPTER ONE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Ghana, according to the Medium Term Agricultural Development Programme (1990) is producing only 22-25% of its total meat requirement. Chief among the several reasons for this low level o f output, is the inadequate supply o f good quality feed. There is plenty o f green forage available for ruminant livestock during the rainy season which may even be underutilized. However, the grasses become wiry and parched during the dry season, resulting in their poor nutritive value. Thus, animals gain weight during the rainy season only to lose it during the dry season. Liveweight losses o f up to 11% for cattle Rose Innes, 1961 and 15% for sheep Otchere et al. 1977 have been reported in the country. Comparative studies o f sheep and goats in Nigeria’s forest zone showed that sheep and goats spent over 90% of their total feeding time browsing (Carew et al. 1980). In the semi-arid and arid regions, shrub and tree fodder become even more important as feed resources due to the harsh environment which makes feed supply uncertain. The role o f leguminous shrubs in integrated farming systems has been highlighted by various workers (Kang et al. 1984, Atta-Krah and Francis, 1986, Atta- Krah, 1989). Browse plants, especially leguminous trees and shrubs, beside providing feed for livestock, supply other needs o f man. It has been suggested that woody leguminous browse species o f high nutritive value if established in the subhumid and semi-arid savanna zones would alleviate the 1 problem of slow growth o f livestock (Rose Innes and Mabey 1964a). This would ensure adequate high quality feed for livestock throughout the year and hence increase production o f meat in the country. Studies on germinability, establishment, yield and quality o f native/introduced browse plants used by stockmen in the country seem not to have been conducted. This knowledge gap needs to be filled. A successful establishment o f such plants will require efficient means o f propagation. Those that establish quickly, have high growth rate and produce high yield o f nutritious forage would then be selected for production. The main objectives o f this work were to study the seed germination, ease o f establishment, forage yield potential and nutritive value o f some indigenous browse plants. 2 CHAPTER TWO 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 FORAGE PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT RECYCLING Multipurpose trees have been used in various cropping practices for the maintenance o f soil nitrogen and other nutrient elements. In this regard, Leucaena leucocephala has been one o f the most highly studied species (N.A.S. 1977, Guevarra et al. 1978). Reports from field trials in Hawaii indicate that under favourable growing conditions, 500-600kg N/ha/yr. is possible if the foliage harvested from this plant were incorporated into the soil. The herbage produced is also a potential feed for livestock and constitutes a very important nitrogen source to the animal. "Kang et al; (1984) reported that a well established hedgerow o f Leucaena leucocephala variety K-28, grown in a sandy Entisol in Nigeria at 4m interrow spacing, produced between 15-20 tonnes o f fresh prunings per year (5.0 - 6.5 t DM/ha with five prunings per year). These prunings, excluding stakes, yielded over 160kg N, 15kg P, 150kg K, 40 kg Ca and 15kg Mg/ha/yr. In Colombia, Rachie (1983) reported that 127kg N/ha was obtained from four months old leucaena plants. A comparison o f biomass and nutrient yield o f Leucaena leucocephala, Acioa barter ii, Alchornea cor difolia and Gliricidia sepium planted in an alley farming system in Nigeria indicated that biomass yield ranged between 3.0 - 7.4 t DM/ha/yr while the nutrient yields were as follows: 40.5 - 246.5 Kg N/ha/yr., 3.6-19.9 kg. P/ha/yr., 20.4 - 184.0 kg K/ha/yr, 14.7 - 104.3 kg Ca/ha/yr. and 5.4 - 17.6 kg 3 Mg/ha/yr. (Kang and Reynolds 1986). Nye and Stephens (1962) reported that Acioa barterii accumulated more calcium and magnesium than natural secondary forest. Nye (1958) observed that in the savanna region o f Northern Ghana, Cajanus cajan planted at close spacing, accumulated larger quantities o f nutrients than Adropogon Supplementing poor quality diets to a protein level o f at least 7% will increase feed intake and animal production (Minson and Milford 1967). Since browse maintains a high nutritive value throughout the year it is valuable for supplementation (Reynolds and Adeoye, 1986). Reynolds and Adeoye (1986) reported that a mixed Leucaena/Gliricidia browse fed in a cut and carry system of feeding increased the productivity index (Kg of offspring weaned/ewe/year) by 55% over those receiving only a basal diet o f Panicum maximum. Parturition interval in sheep reduced in year round continuous breeding when supplementary Leucaena and Gliricidia were made available (International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), 1986). Similarly supplementation with tree legume foliage was shown by van Eys et al. (1986) to improve goat growth rates. Reynolds and Adediran (1988) showed that supplementation o f a grass and cassava peel based diet with a mixed Leucaena/Gliricidia feed, significantly increased both growth rate and survival (up to 24 weeks) o f lambs. Reynolds (1989) fed West African dwarf goats at four levels o f Leucaena and Gliricidia with a basal 4 diet o f Panicum maximum and dried cassava peel to study its effect on growth and survival rates o f the offspring in two breeding seasons. Productivity, (calculated as weight o f kids weaned/doe/year) increased by 0.64kg for each lOOg of browse DM consumed by the does. Dry matter intake also increased as the level o f supplementation rose from 200-800g DM/hd/day, reaching 180g/kg0 75/day for lactating adults. Smith et al. (1990) using the leaves o f Cajanus cajan as supplement to maize stover, observed that the total intake o f Cajanus increased significantly whilst that o f maize stover fell. Both nitrogen intake and retention were increased by the Cajanus. Again, Biru et al. (1990) fed milking cows with freshly cut Sesbania sesban or Leucaena leucocephala to replace part o f the concentrate ration normally given to cows during dry season grazing o f natural pastures. They observed that milk yield o f the browse fed group was significantly higher than the control. Hashim (1990) supplementing the feeding'of range forage sheep with the seed pods o f Dicrostachys cinera and Acacia albida during the dry season, reported that dry matter intake was 814g/head/day for sheep supplemented with seed pods o f Dicrostachys, 855.9 g/head/day for sheep supplemented with Acacia albida and 908.6 g/head/day for the control. The sheep supplemented with Acacia albida gained significantly more liveweight than those on Dicrostachys cinera. The controls lost weight during the experiment. Fodder from trees and shrubs form the bulk o f the feed o f ruminant animals in confinement in most towns and villages in Ghana. Fodder trees and shrubs are 5 2.2 IM PO RTA N CE O F BROW SE PLANTS Browse has been defined as the leaves, shoots and sprouts including tender twigs and stems of woody plants and vines, flowers, pods, and seeds which are eaten to varying extent by both domestic and wild animals (Rose Innes 1977, Devendra 1989, Gutteridge and Shelton 1994). Browse forms an important component o f the diet o f ruminant animals especially goats, sheep and camels and to a lesser extent buffaloes and cattle (Devendra 1989). This appears to be the most important use o f browse plants in arid lands. According to Le Houerou (1978), nearly one-third o f the world’s land surface is natural grassland with varying degrees o f shrub components which serve as an important source o f feed for both domestic animals and wildlife. The feed includes leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds which are rich in protein, vitamins and minerals even in the dry season. Adegbola (1985) found that the major advantage of browse in the feeding of ruminants is that, they maintain a fairly good quality foliage all the year round. In the absence o f this forage, animals during the dry season have only straw from native grasses which are poor in quality and may result in avitaminoses, mineral deficiency and severe debilitations. The trees and shrubs Enable standing feed reserves to be built up so that herds can survive critical periods o f shortfall or therefore very important, for without them, ruminant production especially in the semi-arid areas would have been near impossible. 6 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF BROWSE PLANTS Browse has been defined as the leaves, shoots and sprouts including tender twigs and stems o f woody plants and vines, flowers, pods, and seeds which are eaten to varying extent by both domestic and wild animals (Rose Innes 1977, Devendra 1989, Gutteridge and Shelton 1994). Browse forms an important component o f the diet o f ruminant animals especially goats, sheep and camels and to a lesser extent buffaloes and cattle (Devendra 1989). This appears to be the most important use o f browse plants in arid lands. According to Le Houerou (1978), nearly one-third o f the world’s land surface is natural grassland with varying degrees o f shrub components which serve as an important source o f feed for both domestic animals and wildlife. The feed includes leaves, flowers, fruits, seeds which are rich in protein, vitamins and minerals even in the dry season. Adegbola (1985) found that the major advantage o f browse in the feeding of ruminants is that, they maintain a fairly good quality foliage all the year round. In the absence o f this forage, animals during the dry season have only straw from native grasses which are poor in quality and may result in avitaminoses, mineral deficiency and severe debilitations. The trees and shrubs 'enable standing feed reserves to be built up so that herds can survive critical periods o f shortfall or therefore very important, for without them, ruminant production especially in the semi-arid areas would have been near impossible. 6 prolonged drought without losses (Rose Innes and Mabey 1964a; NAS, 1979; Le Houerou 1980a). Le Houerou (1980a) stressed that browse species are often an effective means of utilising marginal land on which normal crop production is poor owing to climatic, topographic and edaphic constraints. Leguminous browse plants are included in the group o f plants known as multipurpose trees (M PT’S) as they have many other uses apart from their use as feed for ruminants (McKell, 1974). Multipurpose trees provide several needs o f man. According to Le Houerou (1980a) and Nitis (1992) these needs include wood for fuel, building and fencing. In addition they provide various foodstuffs such as fruits and spices as well as medicine, dyes and fibre for clothing, ropes, bags and shade. Multipurpose trees also serve as a means to prevent soil erosion, increase or maintain soil fertility and productivity and in the long term help the balance o f highly sensitive ecosystems (Fianu, 1992a,b). 2.3 FACTORS INFLUENCING PRODUCTIVITY AND SURVIVAL OF BROWSE PLANTS 2.3.1 Climatic factors Climatic factors such as rainfall, temperature, daylength, humidity, wind and light are known to affect the productivity of browse plants. Brewbaker et al. (1985) reported that Leucaena leucocephala performs well in areas of rainfall between 650mm and 3000mm. Calliandra calothyrsus is known to be adapted to altitudes 7 ranging from sea level to 1860m and annual precipitation ranges from 700mm - 3000mm (Lowry and Macklin, 1989) while Albizia lebbek grows well under rainfall regimes ranging from 400 mm to 2500 mm (Lowry et al, 1994). Similarly Erythrina bacteroana grows from sea level to elevations o f 2000 m in South America with rainfall ranging from 800 - 5000 mm per annum (Kass, 1994). On the other hand, Prosopis spp. are very drought tolerant, and have been found in areas receiving less than 100 mm (Gutteridge, 1994). Tropical species such as Leucaena require warm temperatures o f 25 to 30°C during the day for optimum growth (Brewbaker et al. 1985). Whiteman et al. (1986), in south east Queensland, found that Gliricidia sepium became leafless when night temperatures fell below 15°C. Again, Wood and Larkens (1987) reported that Sesbania glandijlora is well adapted to hot humid environments and it does not grow well in the subtropics particularly in areas with cool season minimum temperatures below 10°C. Little is known about the effect of day length on growth and yield o f tropical browse plants. However Hammerton (1976) reported that long daylength increased the herbage yield and depressed the seed yield o f pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in the West Indies. In Leucaena and others shading reduced growth but the legumes tolerated reduced light better than non-legumes (Benjamin et al., 1991). 2.3.2 Biotic factors Le Houerou (1980a) and Adegbola (1985) reported that one o f the factors that threaten the survival o f browse plants is their overexploitation. Due to the high human population growth rate, there is increased pressure on land. Trees are being cleared at a fast rate as cultivated and urban areas expand. This has consequently reduced the area occupied by browse plants (Fianu 1975, 1990). On the Accra plains alone, Fianu (1990) estimated the loss o f grazing land and thickets (in which browse abounds) to real estate to be about 2500 hectares yearly. Bray and Woodroffe (1991) have reported that the psyllid (Heteropsylla cubana) reduced the production of edible material o f Leucaena spp by 52% and that o f the stem by 79% in south east Queensland. The establishment o f Albizia lebbek can be affected by mice, rabbits and domestic ruminants which attack the young plant. Mature leaves are largely unaffected by insects but young leaves may be subjected to heavy predation by the grass-yellow butterfly (Eurema hecoba) (Lowry et al. 1994). Recently, a psyllid has been reported to attack seedlings o f Albizia in India (Lowry et al. 1994). Diseases of browse plants are not widely documented in the literature. However, Brewbaker et al, (1985) have reported that damping off in moist soils caused by the fungus Phythium or Rhizoctonia Spp. is a very serious Leucaena disease in the nursery. It is probable that other species o f browse may encounter similar problems. Damage by wildlife can be a serious hazard to the establishment o f browse plants. In Australia, marsupials, hares, cockatoos and ducks have been reported to chew Leucaena seedlings to the ground level (Shelton 1994b). 9 2.4 METHODS OF PROPAGATING BROWSE PLANTS Browse plants have either been propagated by seed or vegetative means (Le Houerou 1980a, Adegbola 1985). 2.4.1 Seed propagation and factors affecting germination The establishment o f browse plants by seed is the most common method for sowing (Shelton 1994a). Most tree legumes are readily established from transplanted seedlings. The seedlings are first raised in polythene bags until they reach a height of about 30-50cm, and after a short period o f "hardness" in the open air are directly transplanted into the field in moist soils. Various factors have been found to affect germination. These include seed viability, moisture, temperature, light, gases especially oxygen, speed (rate) o f germination and seed dormancy. Among these factors, dormancy is seen to be a potential problem which must be overcome in order to ensure adequate germination. A rapid fate o f seed germination is often beneficial to field establishment. Competition with fast germinating weeds or survival before soil drying are both favoured if the seed germinate quickly (Humphreys, 1987). 2.4.1.1 Dormancy as a factor affecting seed germination Dormancy is a condition in a viable seed which prevents it from germinating when supplied with conditions normally adequate for germination (Greulach, 1973; Mayer and Poljakoff-Mayber, 1975; Harper, 1977; Ellis et al. 1985) Dormancy has an important survival value particularly in regions with marked seasonal changes in 10 environmental factors such as rainfall and temperature (Tybirk, 1991). Different types o f dormancy are encountered in nature. One type is due to impermeable seed coat to water or oxygen. This type o f dormancy results from the impregnation o f the seed coat with waxes or other water proofing substances. Many legumes including clovers, alfalfa and locust beans have this type o f dormancy (Ellis et al. 1985; Tybirk, 1991). Another type o f dormancy is innate dormancy which is associated with rudimentary embryos or physiologically immature embryo. A number o f plant species have seeds that contain only partially developed embryos at the time of seed dispersal. Such seeds therefore need time to ripen. Enforced dormancy is the condition where viable seeds do not germinate because o f some limitation in the environment such as the absence o f light and reduced temperature (Greulach 1973, Mayer and Poljakoff-Mayber 1975, Ellis et. al., 1985, Tybirk 1991). For a dormant seed to germinate, there is the need to break or remove the dormancy. 2.4.1.2 Methods of breaking seed dormancy Various methods have been used to break dormancy in order to obtain fast and homogenous germination either in the laboratory or nursery. These include mechanical and chemical scarification, heat treatment and "after ripening" in dry storage. 11 2.4.1.2.1 Mechanical scarification This involves the nicking, filing, drilling or shaking the seed in a container lined with emery paper or containing gravel (Hartman and Kester 1959, Quinlivan 1966, Mayer and Poljakoff-Mayber 1975, Ellis et al. 1975, Tybirk 1991). These treatments may be detrimental to the seed (Tybrik 1991) as they can crack the seed. However when properly done it is efficient, raising germination percentages close to hundred within a few days in most species such as Albizia lebbek (Tybirk 1991). 2.4.I.2.2. Chemical scarification Concentrated H2S04 or NaOH may be used to soak the seed for some time before sowing (Greulach 1973, Mayer and Poljakoff-Mayber 1975, Ellis et al. 1985, Tybirk 1991). Soaking time varies according to the plant species. For example with _ Acacia. albida. 5 minutes; Acacia nilotica 20-120 minutes, Cassia siamea 10-30 minutes. Often good results are obtained with 50-90% germination within one day to two weeks when the seeds are thoroughly watered (Tybirk 1991). Other chemical compounds that have also been used to remove seed dormancy and which have been reported to promote germination of dormant seed include hydrogen peroxide, ethyl alcohol, sodium hypochlorite, thiourea, marcaptoethanol, nitrates, nitrites, cynides, azide, gibbrellins, cytokinin (for example kinetin) and hydroxyl amine (Ellis et al. 1985). 12 2.4.1.2.3 Heat treatment Heat application methods that have been used to remove seed dormancy include hot water treatment, dry (oven heat) heat, temperature fluctuations and warm water treatment. 2.4.1.2.3.1 Hot water treatment Seeds can be soaked in boiling water for sometime to break dormancy before sowing. Soaking time varies from five seconds for Acacia Senegal to one hour for Acacia sieberiana. This method has often given varied results. For example soaking in boiling water resulted in no effect on Pterocarpus lucens, 2% germination in Acacia nilotica, 60% germination in Acacia sieberiana and 90% germination in Prosopis juliflora (Tybirk, 1991). Instead o f boiling water, seeds can be immersed in hot water at 60-80°C for one to ten minutes to soften the seed coat o f Leucaena leucocephala and Centrosema pubescens (Tybirk, 1991). Soaking seeds in warm water for 24 hours enhances germination o f Pithecellobium dulce (Fianu, personal communications). 2.4.1.2.3.2 Dry heat treatment Heating the seed in an oven with temperatures ranging between 80-250°C from a few seconds to several minutes, helps to break seed dormancy in some species. Heating for ten minutes at 110°C has been used to break dormancy in Acacia hockii (Tybirk, 1991). 13 Temperature fluctuations with an amplitude o f 15°C has been found to hasten germination o f hard seeded legumes such as Acacia nilotica (Tybirk, 1991). Microwave oven has also been used to break seed dormancy. This treatment depends on the moisture content of the seed as well as the species. Microwave treatment cracks the seed coat as happens in Australian Acacias (Tybirk, 1991). 2.4.1.2.4 "A fter ripening" in dry storage "After ripening" is post harvest maturation. It is the loss o f dormancy that gradually occurs when seeds are stored in an air dry state (Hartmann and Kester, 1959; Greulach, 1973; Mayer and Poljakoff-Mayber, 1975; Grant, 1979; Ellis et al., 1985; Tybirk, 1991). 2.4.2 Vegetative propagation In some plant species, vegetative propagation is the only means by which the plant can be established. This may be due to the fact that few or no viable seeds are produced by such species. For some species propagation through the seed is so slow that the best way possible is to use vegetative propagation. Vegetative propagation can be done in many ways. The three common methods used are either by planting with stem cuttings, rootstock or by grafting (Kempana and Chandrasekharia, 1959, Kempana et al. 1961, Greulach 1973, Le Houerou 1980c, Adegbola 1985). Raising stem cuttings in the nursery improves survival rates (Le Flouerou 1980c, Adegbola 1985). Application of growth regulators such as 2, 4- dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2, 4-D) and Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) may 14 improve root development (Kempana and Chandrasekharia 1959, Kempana et al. 1961, Chaudhuri 1965) and thus enhance the survival rates o f the cuttings. Browse plants can also be propagated by air layering with the aid o f growth regulators (Kempana et al. 1961). Age of stem cuttings, diameter and length o f the cuttings, the position o f the cutting on the parent tree, the type o f cut, length o f the storage time and depth o f planting are important factors affecting vegetative propagation. Falvey (1982) conducted some studies into these aspects and reported that gliricidia cuttings should be taken from stems that are at least 6 months old, 0.5 - 2 m in length and from the lower part o f the tree. Stem sections should also be planted as soon as possible after cutting. Glover (1989), as cited by Shelton (1994a), reported that cuttings should be mature branches, greater than 7 cm in diameter and which are brownish green in bark colour. The cut is normally made obliquely at both ends, discarding the younger tips, and the base inserted 20-50cm into the soil. Cuttings for live fences may be up to 200cm while those for hedgerows may be 30-50 cm in length. 2.5 MANAGEMENT OF BROWSE PLANTS Plant spacing and density adopted depend on the size o f the browse plant and the management procedure to be adopted and its utilisation such as in intensive feed gardens, hedgerow browse, and alley farming (Le Houerou, 1980c; Adegbola, 1985). Browse plants can be planted on millet, groundnut or sorghum fields. I f a browse plant such as Faidherbia albida is planted on such fields, a planting density 15 of fifty trees per hectare in rows o f 10m x 20m could be adopted (Le Houerou, 1980c; Adegbola, 1985). Generally, for all species of browse plants, wide spacing encourages fruit production while higher stocking densities promote the production of leaf biomass per unit area. A compound fertilizer providing N, P and K applied at the rate o f 25-50 kg/ha encourages early growth. Watering after planting is beneficial especially in arid zones. Watering on two or three subsequent occasions may be necessary depending on local and seasonal conditions (Le Houerou, 1980c; Adegbola, 1985). A major problem encountered during the establishment of shrubs and trees is competition with weeds. The growth rate o f shrub/tree seedlings is often very slow, thus competition from weeds may result in high plant mortality (Maasdorp and Gutteridge, 1986; Ivory, 1989). Therefore, considerable advantages are gained if the seeds are germinated and the young plants raised in a nursery before transplanting to the field. I f the shoots .and roots are trimmed, at the time of transplanting, it reduces transpiration and stimulates root development (Pound and Martinez - Cairo, 1983). Such seedlings are better able to compete with weeds after transplanting. Le Houerou (1980c) and later Adegbola (1985) have enumerated the following procedures as essential in the management o f browse plants. During the first year after planting, it is always good to reduce or eliminate competition from weeds and this could be achieved by ploughing a strip 1 to 2m wide on each side o f the planted row. This ensures higher survival of the plant and more rapid growth. Species 16 which are normally bushy, for instance Faidherbia albida, should be pruned and protected from browsing until they are strong enough to survive. Certain species like Leucaena leucocephala, need to be cut back to keep them within the reach o f some of the animals. Finally, the plantation should be enclosed to prevent uncontrolled grazing and subsequent damages to the plantation. 2.6 PLANT GROWTH ANALYSIS Growth analysis is a useful tool in studying the complex interaction between plant growth and the environment (Noggle and Fritz 1986). Two basic measurements are normally required to carry out a simple growth analysis. These include a measure of the plant material present (W) and a measure o f the magnitude of the assimilatory system (A) of that plant material (Watson 1947a, Radford 1967). In practice, the most common measures of W and A are the total weight o f the individual plant and the total leaf area- o f the plant. For plants that form a continuous canopy cover such as a sward, W is the total dry weight o f the plant material per unit area o f the ground. Other measures of W that have been used are the total dry weight of the plant material above ground level, above harvest cutting height and some distinctive plant fractions (Watson 1947 a,b.; Blackman et al. 1955, Radford, 1967). The measure of A has been taken as the total photosynthesising area, leaf weight, leaf protein, leaf chrolophyll (Williams 1946, Watson 1952). 17 Common measures o f growth include: Crop growth ra te (CGR). The CGR of a canopy is defined here as the increase in total foliar dry matter per unit area per unit time. CGR = dw/dt. It helps to determine the rate o f foliar dry matter accumulation I of a crop. Relative Growth Rate (RGR). The RGR of a plant in this study refers to increase in total folia dry matter per unit plant present per unit time. RGR = 1/W . dw/dt (g g 1 d '1). RGR helps to assess the efficiency of herbage production' over a time period. Net Assimilation R ate (NAR). The NAR is defined as the increase in weight o f leaves per unit o f assimilatory surface per unit time. NAR = 1/A . dw/dt (g cm'2 w k'1). The NAR is a measure o f the amount o f photosynthetic product going into the forage, thus it is an estimate o f net photosynthesis harvested in the forage. L eaf Area Ratio (LAR). The LAR of a plant is defined as the ratio o f the assimilatory surface per unit leaf weight. LAR = A/W (cm2 g '1). It reflects the density of photosynthetic material in the leaf. It follows from the above definitions that RGR = NAR x LAR (Williams 1946; Watson 1952, 1956; Thorne 1960, Radford 1967, Leopold and Kriedman 1975). These measurements are relevant to the present study in that they throw light on the rate and efficiency of dry matter formation in these plants and contributes to 18 the understanding of their genetic potential for photosynthesis. 2.7 EVALUATION OF FEED QUALITY OF BROWSE PLANTS 2.7.1 Percentage crude protein The minimum level of crude protein (CP) which is1 normally considered adequate for moderate level of production for ruminants is reported to be 11-12% (ARC, 1980). Various workers have reported that browse plants in general have higher CP content (8-30%) than natural or native grasses (2-10%) in the same area (Rose Innes and Mabey, 1964b; Mecha and Adegbola, 1980; Norton, 1994). Mohamed-Saleem et al. (1979) found that the CP content o f browse species ranged from 12.3-21.8%, 5.3-15.6% and 5.5-16.6% respectively for the heavily browsed, moderately browsed and occasionally browsed species. The CP content o f browse plants also depends on the location. For example, Mecha and Adegbola (1980) found the protein content o f Nigerian browse to be different from that of Australia as reported by Wilson (1977). The report by Pellow (1980) showed that there were differences in the CP composition o f six Acacia species studied. Old leaves were shown to have lower protein content than young leaves and this confirms the fact that CP content decreases as the plant ages. The average protein content o f browses in Tropical West Africa was 12.5% (Le Houerou, 1980b). Rose Innes and Mabey (1964 a,b) identified a number o f browse species palatable to local cattle and performed digestibility trials on some of them. The recommended species included Griffonia simplicifolia, Baphia nitida and Antiaris africana. The results 19 showed that Baphia nitida had the highest CP among the three. The CP content o f the species were 21.2%, 18.6% and 11.4% for Baphia nitida, Griffonia simplicifilia and Antiaris africana respectively. Research at the Animal Research Institute (ARI) in Ghana in the late 1960’s showed that the crude protein content o f seeds o f such broWse plants as Samanea saman, Albizia lebbek, Bauhinia monandra, Khaya senegalensis, Caesalpinia pulcherrima and Cassia occidentalis varied (ARI, 1968). A t the University o f Ghana, Adjei and Fianu (1985) worked on Aeschynomene americana and Cajanus cajan cut at 60, 90 and 120 days to assess regrowth and yield o f the plants. They reported a mean dry matter yield of 4.7 t ha'1 and 4.9t ha'1 and mean crude protein content o f 25.2% and 21.4% for Aeschynomene and Cajanus respectively. Karbo and Barnes (1993) studied the preference by sheep and goats o f four browse plants - Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena leucocephala, Sesbania sesban and Cajanus cajan. They reported that the crude protein content o f the browse ranged from 19 to 26% and when offered a forage choice o f the browse species Djallonke sheep selected Cajanus cajan whilst the West African dwarf goat preferred Leiicaena leucocephala. 2.7.2 Cell wall constituents Van Soest (1966, 1967) separated the plant material into soluble and various components using detergent solutions. The cell wall components which represent the neutral-detergent fibre (NDF) is-the residue after extraction with boiling neutral detergent solutions of sodium lauryl sulphate and ethylenediminotetraacetic acid 20 (EDTA). It consists mainly o f hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin and silica. The acid-detergent fibre (ADF) is the residue after refluxing with 0.5M sulphuric acid and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and represents essentially the crude cellulose, lignin and silica. Therefore, it is commonly accepted that the hemicellulose content is determined as a result o f the difference between NDF and ADF. Cellulose and hemicellulose account for a large proportion o f energy obtained from forages, but they differ in their yield o f useful energy due to differences in digestibilities and to a lesser extent to the end product they yield on breakdown in the digestive tract (Crampton, 1956). This difference is attributed to the cellulase enzyme of the microbes which readily ferments cellulose to a greater extent than the hemicellulose. The lignin is highly indigestible and reduces the digestibility o f other components possibly because of encrustation. McDonald et al. (1988) reported that the extent to which cellulose is digested in the rumen depends particularly on the degree of lignification o f the plant material. Lignin and also the related substance, cutin, is resistant to attack by anaerobic bacteria probably because of its low oxygen content and its condensed structure which inhibits hydrolysis. Lignin therefore appears to hinder the breakdown o f cellulose with which it is associated (McDonald et al. 1988). Norton (1994) reported that the digestibility of plant material in the rumen is related to the proportion and lignification o f plant cell walls (NDF), and that tree forages with low NDF content (20-35%) are usually o f high digestibility, while 21 species with high lignin contents are often low in digestibility. Stems have been reported to have higher lignin contents than leaves and hence are less digestible than leaves (Norton, 1994). There are a few exception now, according to available literature. 2.7.3 Mineral content The dietary requirements o f livestock for minerals have been reported to vary with the species, breed o f the animal, its age and rate o f growth or production and with the biological availability o f the mineral in the diet (Underwood, 1981). The minimum requirement o f ruminants for P varies from 0.12 - 0.24% (dry matter basis) depending on the physiological function o f the animal (Norton 1994). The minimum requirement o f sodium for ruminants for satisfactory growth, and lactation and maintenance are estimated to be 0.07 - 0.1% of the dry diet (Hagsten et al. 1975, Morris and Peterson 1975, Norton 1994). Le Houerou (1980b) and Norton (1994) have lamented that there is inadequate information on the mineral content o f browse plants. Le Houerou (1980b) reported that the P and Mg content o f browse in Africa is generally adequate for stock feeding P(0.15%) and Mg (0.60%) but is a little high in Ca (1.7%) and K (1.5%). However, the Ca/P ratio is usually too high (11) as against the optimum figure of 1-2. Although calcium is rarely limiting in forage trees as it is true for forages generally, high concentrations o f oxalic acid in leaves may decrease Ca availability during digestion (Norton 1994).' 22 Vercoe (1987) working on the foliage o f 23 tree species used for livestock feeding in Australia found considerable variation in their chemical composition. P(0.5 - 0.18%), K (0.41 - 1.78%) Ca (0.29 - 3.52%), S (0.21 - 1.13%), Na (<0.01 - 0.41%), Mg (0.21 - 0.62%), Cu 4 - 152 ppm), Al (26 325 ppm) and B (16 - 59 ppm). The minimum needs o f sheep and cattle for Mg for growth can generally be met by pastures or rations containing 0.07% Mg on dry basis (Underwood 1981). 2.7.4 In vitro dry matter digestibility Lignin in grasses and other plants is frequently assumed to be completely indigestible by ruminants, although many examples to the contrary exist in the literature (Sullivan, 1959; Ahn et al. 1989). Sullivan (1959) reported that within a plant species, an increase in lignin content almost invariably resulted in a decrease in digestibility. Ahn et al. (1989) also reported that lignin and) condensed tannins are responsible for low digestibilities in forages. Dry matter digestibility values for some browse plants have been determined by several workers in different ecological zones (Adegbola, 1985). These include the summaries o f Mabey and Rose Innes (1964 a, b) for Ghana which averaged 53.69% and that o f Barnes (1979) as cited by Adegbola (1985) for southern Africa which ranged between 41 - 53.5%. Dry matter digestibility values range widely from 60% for species like Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala down to about 30% for fibrous species (Brewbaker, 1986). The form in which the leaves are fed (fresh, wilted or dry) is known to affect both feed intake and digestibility in some species (Palmer and Schlink, 1992). The dry matter digestibility (DMD) of forages is known to decrease with advancing plant growth. Tilley and Terry (1963) showed that the in vitro digestibility o f lucerne stems declined from 85% when young to 56% at maturity. 2.7.5 In sacco degradabilitv In sacco degradability of DM and N involves placing samples o f ground forage in nylon bags and suspending them in the rumen of fistulated animals by the help of steel weights. The rates o f the digestion o f dry matter can then be determined by removing the bags at varying intervals. The technique provides a powerful tool for the initial evaluation o f feedstuffs and for improving our understanding of the processes of degradation which occur within the rumen (Orskov et al. 1980). The pore size of the nylon bags is very important since it is known to regulate the passage o f solid particles from the bags. Uden et al. (1974) as cited by (Orskov et al., 1980) reported that material with pore size o f 20/x and 35/x have been found to give smaller dry matter losses than from bags with 5/i pores. Van Miellan and Ellis (1977) considered 10//, to be the maximum pore size if loss o f solids was to be prevented. Rodriguez (1968) as cited by Kempton (1980) reported that the pore size of the material used for the manufacture o f the nylon bags apparently has no significant effect on dry matter disappearance from bags during a 72 hour incubation. 24 The optimum size o f the bag has been investigated by a number o f workers (Rodriquez 1968, as cited by Kempton 1980; Mehrez 1976 as cited by Orskov et al., 1980). The optimum size o f the bag is essentially a compromise between two opposing factors. On one hand, it is necessary to have the bag large enough relative to the sample size used so as to ensure that rumen fluid can easily enter the bag and mix with the sample. On the other hand, it is necessary to have the bag small enough for ease o f withdrawal through the rumen canular. Preparation o f the feed samples for incubation is very critical, as they should represent as far as possible the material as they would appear in the rumen had they been consumed by the animal (Bailey 1962 as cited by Orskov et al, 1980). Ideally, masticated ingesta from animals fitted with an oesophageal cannula can be collected but in practice the use of a laboratory hammer mill fitted with 2.5 3.0 mm screen for dry feed is adequate. Erwin and Ellison (1959) as cited by Orskov et al, (1980) found out that the fineness o f grinding o f the sample had less effect on the | disappearance o f dry matter as the period o f incubation was increased. Mohammed and Smith (1977) as cited by Kempton (1980) found out that with grains however, cracking o f the glumes increases degradability and with protein meals, degradability increases with reduction in particle size. The basal diet of cannulated animals has major effect on dry matter disappearance. Kempton (1980) found out that the half time for dry matter disappearance from rice hulls is considerably less in sheep given a diet o f chopped lucerne chaff in comparison with sheep given a diet o f liquid molasses and lOOg 25 wheatened chaff. Orskov and Hovell (1978) found out that dry matter disappearance was 18% lower in bags incubated in the rumen of zebu cattle given chopped sugar cane diet after 40h incubation than animals given pangola hay. It is therefore important that cannulated animals be given standard ration when used to assess the rates o f degradation o f most feed material. It has been suggested that the position o f the nylon bag in the rumen affects the dry matter disappearance o f feed from the bag. Balch and Johnson (1950) as cited by Orskov et al. (1980) showed that the position o f the bag in the rumen had little or no effect on the degradation o f the various feeds. Orskov et al. (1980) reported that the total time for complete or partial degradation varies with the material being incubated. As a rough guide, concentrates require ,12-36 hours, good quality forages 24-60 hours, and poor quality roughages 48-72 hours. These are the times required to reach the asymptote (potential degradation). Mehrez and Orskov (1977) found that the greatest source o f variation in the dry matter disappearance from the bags was betw een, (animal) component (6.2% of the mean) followed by that o f between days (4.9%). The least variation was found between the bags (3.3%) incubated together and withdrawn at the same time. They suggested that the use of one bag, two days (that is a repeat measurement, and three sheep was a reasonable combination). The number o f bags incubated is affected by the type of animal used. In cattle, which generally can have much larger rumen cannulae than sheep, the number of bags incubated at one time can be greater than with sheep, 12 in Balch and Johnson (1950) and 20 in Miles 26 (1951) as cited by Orskov et al. 1980). With sheep, Mehrez and Orskov (1977) found it preferable to incubate no more than five bags in the rumen at the same time in order to avoid the difficulties in their removal from the rumen. 2.8 TOXIC PRINCIPLES IN BROWSE PLANTS Apart from being low in digestibility, some tree species have low acceptability to livestock or contain deleterious principles (Duke 1981, Maslin et al. 1987; Ivory, 1989). High levels o f phenolic compounds such as tannins in many tree species have been implicated as reducing acceptability (Hegarty et al. 1986; Brewbaker, 1986). Duke (1981) listed ninety-seven toxic substances found in some browse legumes. These principles limit the use o f the browse plants as livestock feed (Hegarty et ah 1964). Hegarty et al. (1964) reported that it is not possible to add Leucaena at more than 30% of the diet of goat due directly or indirectly to its mimosine content. Mimosine is degraded by the action of saliva and above all by rumen microbial action to 3,4-dihydroxypyridine (DHP) and thence to 2,3 - DHP which have anti thyroid effects (Hegarty et al., 1986; Christie et al., 1979; Jones, 1979). However, in Indonesia a solution to the mimosine problem has been found in the presence of a gram negative bacterium capable o f metabolising DHP to innocuous substances (Jones, 1986). This microbe is transferable from ruminant to ruminant both artificially and by contact (Jones et al. 1985; Jones and Megarrity, 1986). Although low mimosine lines o f Leucaena have been bred, their low dry matter yield makes 27 them undesirable. Some Acacia species contain linamarine, a cyanogenetic glycoside that can kill instantly by disrupting the electron transport system. If small doses of linamarine are taken in, thiocynate is rather formed and this is goitrogenous as it inhibits the formation o f thyroxine (Jones 1986). There are various ways by which the toxicity o f these browse plants can be reduced. Kang and Reynolds (1986) reported that a combination o f these tree/shrub fodder planted in alley farms and intensive feed gardens (IFG’s) could allow mixed foliage to be offered to livestock and this would minimise the possibility o f toxicity from high levels o f intake o f only one species. This idea has also been expressed by Lowry (1989) who reported that a simple approach to reducing toxicity is to feed the toxic plant in a mixture with other plants, thus diluting the effective level o f each compound. Toxicity can also be minimised through management practices as in many plants, the level of secondary compounds is higher in new or developing leaves than in matured leaves (Lowry 1989). Detoxification by rumen microbial activities is also a possibility (Jones 1986). 28 CHAPTER THREE EX PERIM EN T ONE TITLE: Seed germ ination in some browse plants. 3.1 INTRODUCTION Throughout the developing tropical world, shrub and tree fodders are traditionally used in feeding livestock. This practice calls for studies into sustainable propagation and establishment to enhance their exploitation for the benefit o f the livestock industry. Humphreys and Riveros (1986) advocated that successful pasture establishment occurs when good quality seed or cutting is given the right conditions to germinate or sprout and grow. The objective of the study was to test in vitro, the most appropriate technique for breaking the dormancy o f the seed o f one adapted and nine native browse plants. 3.2 M ATERIALS AND M ETHODS The study was carried out on the seed of the following 10 browse species in the laboratory o f the Department o f Animal Science, University o f Ghana, Legon (Lat. 5° 38’N and 60° O’N, Long. 0° 12’W and 0° 5’E) i. Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp. ii. Dialium guineense Willd. iii. Afzelia africana Sm. iv. Khaya senegalensis (Desr) A. Juss. 29 v. Grewia carpinifolia vi. Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb) Benth vii. Albizia lebbek L (Benth) viii. Milettia thonningii (Schum & Thonn) ix. Baphia nitida Lodd. x. Griffonia simplicifolia (Vahl ex DC) Baill The seeds were given the following treatments. (a) Sowing without any treatment (control) (T,). (b) Soaking in water at room temperature for 14 hours before sowing (T2). (c) Immersing in hot water at 80°C for five minutes before sowing (T3). (d) Scarifying with sand paper until their testa broke before sowing (T4). The experiment, was a 10 x 4 factorial arranged in a completely randomised design with four replicates, the factors being the ten browse species and the four treatment methods. Cotton wool was placed in petri dishes and the seeds were placed on the cotton wool in the dishes. There were five petri dishes per treatment and twenty seeds per dish for all the species with the exception o f Afzelia africana and Khaya senegalensis where there were ten petri dishes and ten seeds per dish as their seeds were so big that twenty could not be contained in one petri dish. Each treatment was replicated four times. The petri dishes were covered but occasionally, the lids were removed to flush in fresh air. Water was sprinkled on the seeds daily when necessary and germination counts made daily for each treatment over a period of 18 days. The appearance of the radicle was used as an index of germination. The 30 rate o f germination was calculated using the method of Maguire (1962). This was done by dividing the number of normal seedlings per 100 seeds obtained at each counting in the standard germination test by the number o f days seeds have been in the germinator. The values obtained at each count were then summed at the end o f the germination test to obtain the germination rate. This is expressed as follows: Number o f normal seedings +— +— + Number o f normal seedlings Days to first count Days to final count Data obtained for the germination percentage were subjected to the arcsin percentage transformation after which analysis o f variance was performed on the data. The treatment means were compared, using the LSD procedure according to Steel and Torrie (1980). 3.3 R E S U L T S Table 3.1 shows the percentage germination o f the seed o f the browse species given different treatments. Seeds of Baphia nitida and Griffonia simplicifolia did not germinate over the study period. The species differed significantly (P<0.05) in percentage seed germination. Cajanus cajan , Afzelia africana and Milettia thonningii had 83.8, 85.8 and 93.8% respectively which were significantly higher (P<0.05) than the rest of the species for the control. Grewia carpinifolia and Dialium guineense had very low germination (10.8% and 12.1% respectively). For the warm water treatment, Milettia thonningii, Afzelia africana and Cajanus cajan had germination value of 90.4%, 77.5% and 69.6% and these were 31 significantly higher (P<0.05) than the rest o f the species. Germination was lowest for Grewia carpinifolia and Dialium guineense. For mechanical scarification, Milettia thonningii, together with Albizia lebbek, Afzelia africana and Cajanus cajan were superior to the rest o f the species (P<0.05). Grewia carpinifolia and Khaya senegalensis were significantly very low (P<0.05). Mechanical scarification did not affect the % germination but warm and hot water slightly depressed the germinability o f Cajanus cajan. Table 3.1: Percentage germination of browse plants under different seed treatments SPECIES T R E A T M E N T LSD (5%)Control (T.) Warm water (T2) Hot water (T3) Mechanical scarification (T4) Cajanus 83.8 69.6 74.6 86.3 9.6 Albizia 26.7 30.4 86.3 94.6 9.1 Milettia 93.8 90.4 90.4 98.3 NS Ajzelia 85.8 77.5 94.2 97.5 NS Pithecellobium 65.4 47.5 65.4 65.8 NS Grewia 10.8 10.4 2.9 15.5 5.0 Khaya 44.2 40.8 28.3 10.8 13.7 Dialium 12.1 5.0 8.8 53.8 5.7 LSD (5%) 15.0 10.2 11.4 17.5 NS = Not significant LSD , Species x treatment = 9.1 32 Table 3.2: Effect of seed treatment on germination time of browse plants (Days) SPECIES T R E A T M E N T LSD (5%) Control (T,) Warm water (T2) Hot water (T3) Mechanical scarification (T4) Cajanus 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 NS Albizia 13.8 14.3 12.8 2.3 4.2 Milettia 4.3 5.4 4.6 3.8 0.7 Afzelia 12.7 12.7 12.0 6.3 2.6 Pithecellobium 7.0 4.3 5.5 3.7 1.0 Grewia 6.7 8.8 9.6 6.4 NS Khaya 9.0 8.4 7.8 6.8 2.0 Dialium 4.4 7.5 5.8 3.3 1.0 LSD (5%) 3.0 1.8 2.4 2.8 NS = Not signiJleant LSD, Species x treatment = 1.5 For Albizia lebbek hot water treatment or mechanical scarification significantly (P<0.05) improved the germinability while warm water only slightly influenced it. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) among treatments for Milettia thonningii, Afzelia africana and Pithecellobium dulce. With regard to Grewia carpinifolia hot water treatment depressed % germination (P<0.05) while mechanical scarification increased it slightly. Warm water treatment did not affect it. 33 In Khaya senegalensis, whereas warm water treatment did not affect the % germination hot water treatment and mechanical scarification actually decreased the % germination (P<0.05). In Dialium guineense,hot water treatment did not affect the germination percentage, whereas warm water depressed it (P<0.05) and mechanical scarification increased it (P<0.05). There was a significant (P<0.05) species x treatment effect on percentage germination. Table 3.2 shows the effect of seed treatment on germination time o f the browse plants in days. Significant differences (P<0.05) were observed among the species under all treatments. No matter what treatment method was adopted, Cajanus cajan and Milettia thonningii took the same time to germinate for all the treatments (3 and 4 days respectively). Mechanical scarification reduced the number of days to germination from 13.8 to 2.3 and 12.7 to 6.3 in Albzia lebbek and Afzelia africana respectively. For Grewia carpinifolia and Dialium guineense, warm and hot water treatments increased the number o f days to germination. The control and mechanical scarification were similar. There was a significant (P<0.05) species x treatment effect on days to germination. The rate o f germination of the eight species o f browse plants under different treatments is presented in Table 3.3. The species differed significantly (P<0.05) in the rate of germination. Significantly higher (P<0.05) germination rates were recorded by Pithecellobium dulce, Milettia thonningii and Albizia lebbek in T4 (15.5, 31.1 and 42.0 respectively). With the exception of Khaya senegalensis in which the germination rate in T4 was significantly lower (P<0.05), (0.9) than in the others. 34 Mechanical scarification significantly increased (P<0.05) the germination rate in all other species more than the other treatments. There was a significant (P<0.05) species x treatment effect on rate o f germination. Table 3.3: Rate of germination of browse plants under different seed treatments Species T r e a t m e n t LSD 5%Control (T.) Warm water (T2) Hot water (T3) Mechanical scarification (T4) Cajanus 2.3 1.0 1.4 4.8 0.13 Albizia 2.1 2.7 8.3 42.0 0.43 Milettia 22.0 11.9 22.8 31.1 0.36 Ajzelia 6.4 6.0 6.7 7.8 0.16 Pithecellobium 7.1 11.0 8.1 15.5 0.36 Grewia 1.8 1.6 0.3 4.8 0.13 Khaya 3.6 3.9 3.0 0.9 0.45 Dialium 3.9 0.8 1.6 18.5 0.32 LSD (5%) 0.92 0.13 0.17 0.52 LSD Species x treatment = 0.19 35 3.4 D I S C U S S I O N The differences in the germination o f the browse species as influenced by the different treatments adopted seem to agree with the findings o f other workers (Whiteman, 1980; Grant and Clatworthy 1984). Although seed treatment generally promotes germination, the actual method used would depend on the browse species and the feasibility o f the seed treatment method. The high germination obtained in the scarified seed agree with the findings o f other workers (Viliers, 1972; Ellis et al. 1985). Such treatments are known to improve germination by enhancing permeability to moisture and gases (Milthorpe and Moorby, 1986; Tybirk 1991). It may also increase the seeds sensitivity to temperature and light as well as result in the removal or destruction o f some o f the inhibitory substances (Ellis et al. 1985) thus improving germination. On the contrary, comparatively lower germination with scarification have also been reported in other studies (Clark et al. 1968; Bewley and Black, 1978). Scarification damaged the seed coat o f such seeds and led to the loss of cell contents stimulating the growth o f fungal pathogens. The low germination given by the scarified seeds o f Khaya senegalensis might be attributed to the fact that mechanical scarification led to the peeling off o f a greater part o f the embryo and subsequent build up o f fungal pathogens.. Dell (1980) reported that different treatments gave different water uptake curves for Albizia lophanta. This gives an indication that the various treatments adopted in the trial might have affected the imbibition o f water by the seeds differently hence some o f the species recording higher germination than others. 36 Tybirk (1991) reported that seed coat dormancy o f legumes in semi-arid climate has many important ecological advantages such as endozooic dispersal, recolonisation after fire and escape in terms o f time. This is seen in the differential germination of hard seeded legumes o f a population under the same stimulus. Seeds with no pretreatments have been found to germinate in spurts if kept moist over long periods o f time (Halevy, 1974; Coe and Coe, 1987). This explains why appreciable germination was recorded in some of the untreated species. Even though most o f the species obtained their lowest germination in the untreated groups, some of them germinated after long periods as was exhibited by Albizia lebbek and Afzelia africana. Freshly harvested seeds have been reported to germinate differently from seeds that have been stored for some period. For example, fresh seeds o f Cassia siberiana, Albizia gummifera, Acacia hockii, Acacia milifera and Acacia tortilis had germination of 67-100% after hot water treatment, whilst the same treatment gave germination of 3-31% for old stored seeds (Schmidt 1988 as cited by Tybirk, 1991). This might explain the differences found in the various treatments as some of the seeds for the study were collected after their dispersal from the plant whilst other seeds were collected whilst still on the plant. Ellis et al., (1985) have observed imbibition injury and subsequent destruction of the embryo o f forage sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) when immersed in warm water. In the same way Rudrapel and Basu (1980) also observed soaking injury resulting from rapid imbibition when soybean was immersed in warm water. These findings 37 might explain why Dialium guineense seeds for both warm and hot water treatments were very low. Tybirk, (1991) reported that the kind of treatment and the duration of the treatment is very important and this should be considered in each case and depends mainly on species, duration o f storage o f the seed and moisture content o f the seed. Maguire (1962) reported that seedlots with similar total gemination often vary in the rate o f seedling emergence and rate o f growth. This finding seems to explain the differences that were observed in both the percentage germination as well as the rate of germination. For example, Milettia thonningii and Afzelia africana had similar germination percentages (98.3 and 97.5) respectively for mechanical scarification, their rates o f germination were 31.1 and 7.8 respectively. Also Cajanus cajan recorded a high % germination (86.3) for mechanical scarification but a low rate of germination o f 3.4. This might also be explained by varietal differences (Craddock and Vogel, 1960 as cited by Allen et al., 1961) who reported that large varietal differences in rate o f seedling emergence occur in nature. The rate of germination has also been found to decrease with decreasing available moisture but the rate of decline varies with species (Evans and Stickler, 1961; Nyborg 1961). The reason why Baphia nitida and Griffonia simplicifolia failed to germinate is not quite clear. However, it was observed that the seeds got mouldy within 24 hours after sowing in the petri dishes and some greenish liquid was found in them especially in Griffonia simplicifolia. This greenish liquid may contain inhibitors to 38 germination and the seed may as well need "after ripening" period since they were freshly collected from the plants. 39 CHAPTER FOUR EXPERIMENT TWO TITLE: GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF SELECTED BROWSE PLANTS OF GHANA 4.1 INTRODUCTION According to Noggle and Fritz (1986) the term growth in the broad sense is used to denote an increase in size by cell enlargement and cell division together with the synthesis o f new cellular material and the organisation o f sub cellular organells. Development however is used to encompass the activities resulting from growth and differentiation. Growth can be measured in many different ways. These include plant height measurement, individual leaf size (length, width, area), plant fresh weight and dry weight partitioned among organs such as roots, stems, leaves and fruits, cell numbers in tissues and organs, and concentration o f specific chemical constituents (nucleic acid, soluble nitrogen, protein nitrogen, lipids, carbohydrate) in tissues and organs. The growth and development o f browse plants is affected by genetic, nutritional, environmental and hormonal factors. How these factors affect the growth and development o f the plant would ultimately determine its yield. The leaf with its axilliary bud is the smallest module of organised structure in higher plants and it plays a vital role in the construction of the crown structure o f the tree (Harper and White, 1974). Many strategies of leaf display and variation in leaf life span have 40 been evolved to maximize production in higher plants (Chabot and Hicks, 1982). Thus total leaf area is primarily determined by the pattern o f production, leaf fall and longevity of leaves (Watson, 1956) along with seasonal variation in leaf size (Kozlowski, 1971). Many investigations related to plant growth processes such as photosynthesis, net assimilation rate (NAR), transpiration and response to management practices require an estimation o f leaf area (Ndawula-Senyimba, 1972). The objective o f this experiment was to study the changes in plant height with time, the relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR) and leaf area ratio (LAR) of the browse plants. 4.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS Soil collected from Pokoase Agricultural Station, 15km from Legon, was autoclaved at 2.11 kg/cm2 pressure and put into perforated polythene bags o f size 18cm x 25cm. The bags were then put under a 2xh m high shed behind the Animal Science Department, University of Ghana, Legon, and planted with the following eight browse species. 1. Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp. 2. Dialium guineense willd. 3. Afzelia africana sm. 4. Khaya senegalensis (Desr) A Juss 5. Grewia carpinifolia 6. Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb) Benth. 41 7. Albizia lebbek (L) Benth. 8. Milettia thonningii (Schum and Thonn). The experimental design was a completely randomised design with 8 replicates. Four seeds o f each species were planted in each o f the polythene bags. After emergence, the plants in the polythene bags were thinned to one plant per bag. Data collected included weekly height o f the plant from the soil surface to the tip of the terminal bud. The leaf area of the plants was determined every five weeks by using the cork borer method (Edje and Osiru, 1987). Two plants were used at a time for the leaf area determination. One of the two plants (A) was used to get the cork bored leaves and the leaves from the remaining plant (B) was bulked together with the leaves from (A) that was left after the cork bored leaves had been taken. The cork bored leaves as well as the other bulked leaves were dried in an oven to constant weight, and used to estimate the leaf area. The leaf area o f the leaf discs is related to the bulk leaf area as follows. Area of leaf discs (cm2') = leaf area o f the bulk leaves ('em2) weight (g) of leaf discs weight (g) of the bulk leaves From this relationship, the leaf area of the bulked leaves was calculated. For the determination of the growth rates o f the browse plants, the graphical method as described by Noggle and Fritz (1986) was used. Growth curves (Fig. 4.1) were plotted, a straight line, touching the curves at approximately 30 and 60 days after planting were drawn. Triangles were then constructed and the growth rates 42 calculated from the units o f the coordinates o f the graph. The calculated leaf area for the plants together with their dry matter accumulation for, 5, 10, 15 and 20 weeks were used to calculate Net assimilation rate (NAR) and leaf area ratio (LAR) while the dry matter accumulation alone was used to calculate the relative growth rate (RGR) by using the following formulae (Noggle and Fritz, 1986). RGR = 2.303 (log.n Wo - log,„ W,) *2 ‘ t] NAR = fWo - W ,) 2.303 (log10A? - loglp A ,) (k - *i) (A2 A,) LAR = (An - A ,) 2.303 (logl0 W2 - log10 W.) 2.303 (log10A2 log,0 A,) W2 W,) where W „ A„ W2, A2 represent dry weights and leaf areas at time intervals t, and tj respectively. 43 Pl an t h ei g h t (c m ) L S D (P < 0 '0 5 ) I LSD 5 10 15 20 No. of weeks after emergence (P < 0 05) Cajanus Albizia Milettia Afzelia Pithecellobium —■— Grewia Dialium Figure 4.1: Height (cm) of seven browse species during 20 weeks of growth 44 4.3 RESULTS Khaya senegalensis seeds did not emerge in the test and Dialium guineense and Grewia carpinifolia had very poor emergence (Table 4.1). Table 4.1: Number of seeds of browse species that emerged from the soil Species Replicates Total % Emergence 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ■ Emergence Cajanus 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 2 28 87.5 Albizia 4 4 4 3 4 3 2 3 27 84.4 Milettia 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 29 90.6 Afzelia 3 3 4 4 4 2 3 3 26 81.3 Pithecellobiu m 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 16 50.0 Grewia 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 9.4 Khaya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dialium 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 5 15.6 In view of this, after taking the height measurements o f these two species subsequent measurement on them were discarded hence the species that were used to continue the study were, Cajanus cajan, Afzelia africana, Pithecellobium dulce, Albizia lebbek and Milettia thonningii. The growth rates o f the plants are shown in Table 4.2. The growth rate of Cajanus cajan was the highest at both 30 and 60 days of growth. This was followed by Grewia carpinifolia, Albizia lebbek and Pithecellobium dulce in that order. These also had increases in growth rates at 30 and 60 days o f growth. On the contrary, Afzelia africana, Millettia thonningii and Dialium guineense had low growth rates 45 and their growth rates fell at 30 and 60 days o f growth. 46 Table 4.2: Growth rates (cm d'1) of browse plants to 30 and 60 days after planting Species 30 days 60 days Cajanus cajan 2.80 4.20 Grewia carpinifolia 1.75 1.86 Albizia lebbek 1.63 1.75 Pithecellobium dulce 1.40 1.75 Afzelia africana 0.70 0.20 Milettia thonningii 0.46 0.07 Dialium guineanse 0.35 0.11 The leaf area development o f browse plants for 5, 10, 15 and 20 weeks o f growth is presented in Table 4.3. Table 4.3: Leaf area development of browse to 20 weeks of growth (cm2) Species W e e k s X SE 5 10 15 20 Pithecellob ium 744.4 1486.7 1211.7 1982.8 1356.43 259.0 Cajanus 4768.6 37562.7 39854.7 128660.8 52711.7a 26554.3 Afzelia 461.0 2481.0 2362.3 2022.4 1831.73 467.1 Albizia 586.7 1811.8 4450.2 6160.6 3252.3a 1260.7 Milettia 568.9 1524.2 2125.9 3429.6 1912.23 598.8 X 1425.9a 8973.3A 10001.0A 28451.3A SE 836.9 7149.6 7482.2 25063.9 Means bearing the same superscript are not significantly different (P>0.05). 47 Table 4.3 shows that the leaf area o f Cajanus cajan, Albizia lebbek and Milettia thonningii continuously increased from week 5 through to week 20. Table 4.4: Dry matter yield of browse plants to 20 weeks of growth (g) Species W e e k s X SE 5 10 15 20 Pithecellobium 0.30 6.2 2.9 5.1 3.6a 1.3 Cajanus 5.5 38.3 65.6 279.9 97.3a 62.1 Afzelia 0.8 4.2 4.8 4.3 3.5a 0.9 Albizia 0.5 8.3 10.3 13.4 8 . r 2.6 Milettia 0.3 6.4 8.5 9.2 6.1a 2.0 X 1.5a 12.7A 18.4a 62.4a SE 1.0 6.4 11.9 54.4 Means bearing the same superscript are not significantly different (P>0.05). The highest yield o f dry matter was recorded by Cajanus cajan from week 5 through to week 20 (Table 4.4). Similarly Albizia lebbek and Milettia thonningii also increased in dry matter accumulation from week 5 through week 20 but these increases were not as large as in Cajanus cajan. Pithecellobium dulce increased in dry matter accumulation from week 5 till week 10, decreased in week 15 and rose again in week 20. Afzelia africana on the other hand, had increases in dry matter from week 5 till week 15 and then decreased in week 20. Relative growth rate (RGR), Net assimilation (NAR) and Leaf area ratio (LAR) of 5 browse plants to 70 days of growth are presented in table 4.5. 48 Table 4.5: RGR, NAR and LAR of five browse plants to 70 days of growth Species RGR (g g'd- ' ) NAR (g cm'2d_1) LAR (c m V 1) Pithecellobium dulce 0.026 435.24 x 10-6 59.89 Cajanus cajan 0.052 153.46 x lO"6 339.40 Afzelia africana 0.021 189.06 x 10'6 108.45 Albizia lebbek 0.030 491.05 x lO'6 61.58 Milettia thonningii 0.027 439.72 x lO'6 60.32 Values o f RGR and LAR were highest in Cajanus cajan whilst its value for NAR was the lowest. Pithecellobium dulce had the fourth highest value in RGR, third in NAR and lowest in LAR. Afzelia africana had the lowest value for RGR and fourth value for NAR and and second in LAR. Albizia lebbek had the highest value in NAR, second in RGR and third in LAR. Milettia thonningii was second in NAR, third in RGR and fourth in LAR. 4.4 DISCUSSION Based on the results o f the RGR, NAR and LAR, it was obvious that Cajanus cajan was able to increase its dry weight at a faster rate than the rest o f the species. That Albizia lebbek had the highest value for NAR could be explained in terms of species differences. Watson (1952) explained that the NAR measures the net result of photosynthetic gain over respiratory loss and this may vary according to the magnitude of respiration. For example, if the total respiration o f an entire plant is expressed in terms o f leaf area, then NAR is likely to increase with age but LAR will decrease, as an older plant is not as leafy so that NAR could fall irrespective of 49 change in photosynthetic activity. The lowest NAR value obtained from Cajanus cajan suggests that it was the poorest in putting up dry material. This was not the case since Cajanus cajan accumulated the highest dry matter. This discrepancy could be explained by the findings of Watson (1952) that precautions should be taken when comparing species by using their NAR values. Watson (1952) noted that because NAR gives no direct indication of respiratory losses, it does not necessarily serve as a direct measure of inherent photosynthetic capacities. Watson (1952) reported that while NAR indicates a plant efficiency at producing dry matter, economic yield is subject to additional controls and it is not necessarily related to photosynthetic efficiency. The differences in NAR observed in the species agree with the findings o f Hunt (1978) that wide variation in NAR may occur between species. 50 CHAPTER FIVE EXPERIMENT THREE TITLE: PROPAGATING NATIVE BROWSE PLANTS USING STEM CUTTINGS. 5.1 INTRODUCTION Propagation by stem cuttings is one o f the means o f establishing browse plants (Le Houerou 1980c, Adegbola 1985, Ivory 1989). In some plant species, this is the surest way of their establishment as the seeds produced by these plants may not be viable, or seedling growth from germinated seeds may be very slow. Establishing cuttings in the nursery improves the survival rates o f stem cuttings: Growth regulators such as hormones are very important in the establishment o f stem cuttings as they may help to improve root development so that the cuttings could easily be established. The objective o f this experiment was to study the sprouting ability as well as the growth rate o f some native browse plants using hardwood stem cuttings and with the help o f a rooting hormone. 5.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS Soil collected from Pokoase and treated as in Chapter 4 was used. The polythene bags were put under a two and half metre high shed to provide shade for the cuttings. The browse species used in the study were Cajanus cajan, Dialium guineense, Afzelia africana, Khaya senegalensis, 51 Grewia carpinifolia, Pithecellobium dulce, Albizia lebbek, Milettia thonningii, Baphia nitida, Grijfonia simplicifolia, Ficus exasperata and Spondias mombin. These were treated with a rooting hormone before planting. The hormone, Biozyme TS (manufactured by Bioenzymas S.A. De Cu of Mexico) was used together with an adherent - Bionex (manufactured by the same company). There were four treatments as follows: 1. No hormone application (control treatment) (T,). 2. Application o f the hormone and adherent based on the manufacturer’s recommendation (i.e. 5cc Biozyme TS plus lcc Bionex in one litre of water) (T2). 3. Twice the normal concentration o f the hormone (i.e., lOcc Biozyme TS plus 2cc Bionex in one liter o f water) (T3). 4. Three times the normal concentration o f the hormone (ie 15cc Biozyme TS plus 3cc Bionex in one litre o f water) (T4). Mean diameter and length o f the cuttings were 15mm and 30cm respectively. The base o f the cuttings were dipped in the hormone solution for 10-15 minutes before planting. The experiment was a 12 x 4 factorial arranged in a completely randomised design with four replicates, the factors being the twelve browse plants and the four treatment methods. Data were collected on the number of sprouts on every cutting at two and four weeks after planting. The plant height (cm) taken from the base to the tip o f the 52 sprout from each cutting was recorded at monthly intervals for a period o f six months. 5.3 R E S U L T S Table 5.1 shows the sprout check on cuttings 2 and 4 weeks after planting. Sprouting did not occur in Griffonia simplicifolia, Afzelia africana, Dialium guineense and Albizia lebbek in any o f the treatments while Cajanus cajan, Grewia carpinifolia, Khaya senegalensis and Spondias mombin sprouted in all the four treatments but died within 2 to 4 weeks after sprouting. A close look at the base of the cuttings which died after sprouting as well as those that never sprouted indicated that no roots developed in them. Thus the species that actually survived were: Baphia nitida, Milettia thonningii, Pithecellobium dulce and Ficus exasperata. Figure 5.1 shows the effect o f hormone application on the growth o f the browse species during 6 months of growth. The species differed significantly (P0.05) in the growth o f the sprouts. Pithecellobium dulce gave significantly higher (P<0.05) growth than the rest o f the species for all the treatments. For T, Pithecellobium dulce was highest (15.5 cm), followed by Baphia nitida (7.3 cm) with Ficus exasperata being the lowest (2.3 cm). For T2, Pithecellobium dulce was the highest (53.9cm) followed by Baphia nitida (6.5 cm), then Ficus exasperata (2.5 cm) with Milettia thonningii being the lowest (1.0 cm). In T3, Pithecellobium dulce was again the highest (31.2 cm) 53 followed by Milettia thonningii (22.3 cm). Ficus exasperata and Baphia nitida were similar (2.9 cm and 2.3 cm respectively). In T4, Pithecellobium dulce was highest (33.1 cm) followed by Ficus exasperata (20.0 cm) then Milettia thonningii (11.1 cm) and then Baphia nitida (2.8 cm). Baphia nitida in T, was the highest (7.3 cm) whilst that in T3 was the lowest (2.3 cm). For Milettia thonningii T3 was the highest (22.3 cm). This was followed by T4 (11.1 cm) whilst T2 was the lowest (1.0 cm). With regards to Pithecellobium dulce, T2 was the highest (53.9cm). This was followed by T4 (33.1cm) whilst T, was lowest (15.5cm). Ficus exasperata had a significantly higher (P<0.05) growth (20.0cm) for T4 compared to all the other treatments. 54 Table 5.1: Sprout check on cuttings 2 and 4 weeks after planting Species Period 1 (2 weeks) Period 2 (4 weeks) T, t 2 T3 T4 T, t 2 T3 t 4 Cajanus cajan + + + + - - - Albizia lebbek - - - - - Pithecellobium dulce + + + + + + + + Milettia thonningii + + + + + + + + Afzelia africana - - - - - - - Grewia carpinifolia + + + + - - - Khaya senegalensis + + + + - - - Baphia nitida + + + + + + + + Griffonia simplicifolia - - - - - - - Dialium guineense - - - - - - - Ficus exasperata + + + + + + + + Spondias mombin + + + + - - - Normal concentration of hormone Twice the normal concentration o f hormone Thrice the normal concentration o f hormone Presence o f sprouts (roots or buds) Absence of sprouts (roots or buds) 55 Figuro 5.1: E ffect of H orm one A pplication on the G row th o f 4 brow se p lan ts Height (cm) Height (cm) o3 O U1 Height (cm) 3 8 Height (cm) « 8 8 Ao ou\ (S O' O > d) Q S" I 5.4 DISCUSSION The differences in growth among the browse species is in agreement with the findings of Larbi et al (1993) who classified Baphia nitida together with Dialium guineense as very slow growth rate types o f browse plants and Leucaena leucocephala together with Alchornea cordifolia as fast growth rate types. These differences may also have been influenced by the age, diameter and length as well as the depth o f planting. Since stem cuttings were taken from plants whose ages could not be determined, it could be that the cuttings were taken from plants o f different ages, resulting in the differences in growth. Falvey, (1982) has recommended that cuttings should be taken from stems which are at least six months old and from the lower part o f the tree, and should be matured. They should be of diameter of 7.0cm and o f length 0.5-2m. The diameter and length o f the cuttings used in the study were 15mm and 30cm respectively which is in contrast with the 7cm in diameter and 0.5-2m in length as recommended by Falvey (1982) and Glover (1989) as cited by Shelton (1994a). It was not clear why some of the cuttings failed to develop roots since the basis of choosing the hormone was to help the cuttings to develop roots quickly so that the sprouts could easily survive. Here, it could be said that the hormone is likely to be effective for some species and not others. The failure of some of the cuttings to develop roots may also be attributed to the depth o f planting. Glover (1989) as cited by Shelton (1994a) recommended that cuttings should be planted 20- 50cm deep into the soil and since a planting depth of less than 6cm was adopted in 57 the study it might be possible that the shallow depth o f planting affected the root development of some of the species. Environmental conditions have been found to modify the pattern o f shoot development in stem cuttings (Noggle and Fritz, 1986) and it is possible that the ambient temperature and relative humidity provided during the study period were not all that conducive for the development of the shoot system, hence the differences in growth. 58 CHAPTER SIX EXPERIMENT FOUR TITLE: FORAGE YIELD OF SOME NATIVE BROWSE PLANTS ESTABLISHED ON THE FIELD 6.1 INTRODUCTION The importance o f browse trees and shrubs is acknowledged throughout the world and much work is being carried out under various disciplines (Le Houerou 1980a). The major value o f such plants is that they provide protein, vitamins and