Multicomponent Photocatalytic-Dispersant System for Oil Spill Remediation Selassie Gbogbo, Emmanuel Nyankson,* Benjamin Agyei-Tuffour, Yaw Kwakye Adofo, and Bismark Mensah Cite This: ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 Read Online ACCESS Metrics & More Article Recommendations *sı Supporting Information ABSTRACT: In the present work, the potential application of a fabricated halloysite nanotubes-Ag-TiO2 (HNT-Ag-TiO2) compo- site loaded with a binary surfactant mixture made up of lecithin and Tween 80 (LT80) in remediating oil spillages was examined. The as-prepared Ag-TiO2 that was used in the fabrication of the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 composite was characterized by X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, UV−vis and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, CV analyses, and SEM-EDX. The synthesized composite was also characterized by thermogravimetric analysis, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The synthesized composite was active in both the UV and visible light regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. The oil-remediating potential of the as-prepared composite was examined on crude oil, and aromatics and asphaltene fractions of crude oil. The composite was able to reduce the surface tension, form stable emulsions and smaller oil droplet sizes, and achieve a high dispersion effectiveness of 91.5%. A mixture of each of the crude oil and its fractions and HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 was subjected to photodegradation under UV light irradiation. The results from the GC-MS and UV−vis analysis of the photodegraded crude oil revealed that the photocatal composite was able to photodegrade the crude oil, aromatics, and asphaltene fractions of crude oil with the formation of intermediate photodegradation products depicting that the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 has a potential as an oil spill remediation material. ■ INTRODUCTION Oil spills bring in its wake several grave challenges to the environment, generating media and political turmoil. Current remediating measures employed in curbing the catastrophic effects of oil spills have included the utilization of chemical dispersants, mechanical containment with booms and collect- ing the spilled oil, the burning of the constrained crude oil at the spilled site on the high seas, employing the degrading effect of biological organisms on crude oil and the use of materials with sorption capacities.1,2 These measures have left in their wake teething issues with the environment, especially the marine environment whenever they have been used. The relatively high cost of current chemical dispersants on the market and its harsh effects on the marine environment is an example.3,4 Research responses to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and formulate environmentally friendly remediation measures that can solve the limitations of existing remediation measures are ongoing. Attention is currently directed toward the develop- ment of dispersant composite using less toxic and food category surfactants such as Lecithin and Tween 80,5,6 advanced oil sorbents materials7−9 photocatalysts1,10−12 and photothermal materials.13−15 The most widely accepted response option for large-scale oil spills is chemical dispersant application.2 Dispersants are constituted by surface-active materials/surfactants that are amphiphilic, i.e., possessing a tail and a head that is hydrophobic and hydrophilic respectively, hydrocarbon-based solvents and additives.16,17 When chemical dispersants are applied to a marine environment spilled with oil, the interfacial tension of the oil-seawater mixture is reduced drastically. With reduced interfacial tension of the oil−water mixture, the combination of surface and subsurface ocean currents and the height of the waves aids in the breaking down of the spilled oil into tiny droplets by an emulsification process. These insoluble crude oil droplets get suspended in the water column and are acted upon by microbes.3,18−22 Employing the services of chemical dispersants decreases the probability of the crude oil Received: August 15, 2023 Revised: January 25, 2024 Accepted: February 6, 2024 Published: February 16, 2024 Articlehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society 8797 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 This article is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 D ow nl oa de d vi a 19 7. 25 5. 68 .7 0 on A pr il 8, 2 02 4 at 1 0: 45 :2 4 (U T C ). Se e ht tp s: //p ub s. ac s. or g/ sh ar in gg ui de lin es f or o pt io ns o n ho w to le gi tim at el y sh ar e pu bl is he d ar tic le s. https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Selassie+Gbogbo"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Emmanuel+Nyankson"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Benjamin+Agyei-Tuffour"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Yaw+Kwakye+Adofo"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Bismark+Mensah"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Bismark+Mensah"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1021/acsomega.3c05982&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?goto=articleMetrics&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?goto=recommendations&?ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?goto=supporting-info&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=tgr1&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/toc/acsodf/9/8?ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/toc/acsodf/9/8?ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/toc/acsodf/9/8?ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/toc/acsodf/9/8?ref=pdf http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org?ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://acsopenscience.org/researchers/open-access/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ spilled moving ashore and causing havoc to birds and mammals.3,16 Liquid dispersants face drawbacks such as reduced potency during storage and toxicity from added organic solvents. The quest for eco-friendly alternatives arises from the need for potent, cost-effective, and less toxic dispersants, as large quantities of aqueous-soluble dispersants increase both toxicity and application costs.4,23 Integrating food-grade surfactants, like Lecithin, into dispersant formulations effectively addresses the previously mentioned concerns regarding dispersant performance and environmental impact.6,24,25 Owuseni, Nyankson et al. have shown that solid-based dispersants with high potency can be developed by loading surfactants into the tubular holes of HNTs, which can be released to stabilize the oil-in-water emulsion.6,24 These solid-based dispersants will curb the toxic effects of the organic solvents used in the dispersant formulation. Another major limitation of dispersants is their inability to remediate the water-soluble components of crude oil in the marine environment. The observation over the years is that water-soluble portions of hydrocarbons from spilled oil stay in the marine ecosystem for several years, wreaking damaging effects on the oceans with a causal sequence on the economy and well-being of the inhabitants in the areas where crude oil spill occurs.2,26−30 On the other hand, the effectiveness of photocatalysis in degrading pollutants that are water-soluble, such as dyes, pesticides, and pharmaceutical wastes has been reported.31−35 The limitation associated with the application of chemical dispersants, that is, its inability to remediate water-soluble components, can be addressed through photocatalysis. In photocatalysis, a photocatalyst is irradiated with photons of energy either equal to or bigger than the band gap resulting in the excitation of electrons from a lower energy level, that is, the valence to the higher energy level conduction band.36 This leads to the formation of electrons inhabiting the conduction band and holes in the valence band. Dissolved oxygen and water coming into contact with these electrons and holes causes a reaction that forms reactive oxygen species (ROS)37 that can attack water-soluble pollutants degrading them into nontoxic compounds.38 The literature abounds with photo- catalysts such as ZnO, SnO2, ZrO2, TiO2, and CuO being effective at photodegrading water-dissolvable pollutants such as crude oil, dyes, pesticides, and pharmaceutical substan- ces.1,10−12,36,38,39 Photocatalysis has found application in hydrogen production and carbon dioxide reduction as well.36,38,40 Among these photocatalysts, TiO2 has shown the greatest potential owing to its advantageous properties such as high chemical and thermal stability, a band gap that is tunable, relatively low cost coupled with the fact that it is available in greater quantities.1,12,39 The above notwithstanding, the use of TiO2 nanoparticles has been saddled with some limitations such as wide band gap and fast recombination of photoexcited electrons.41 Studies report that cocatalyst loading,39 doping with metals (e.g., Au, Fe, W, Cr, and V) or nonmetals (e.g., N, C, F, and S),39 mixed phases42−44 and the engagement of the different morphologies of TiO2 such as nanospheres, nano- tubes, nanorods, nanofibers, and nanowires39 helps in improving its photocatalytic efficiency. Again, the modification of TiO2 through the deposition of metallic nanoparticles on its surface has been reported to solve this challenge. It enables it to utilize ultraviolet and visible light radiation with improved photocatalytic efficiency.1,12,36,45,46 The photocatalytic activity of TiO2 can be improved by the addition of Ag, a noble metal, to its surface. This enhancement is achieved through the localized Surface Plasmon Resonance effect, which has been well-documented in the literature.47−51 This effect not only reduces the rate of recombination of photoexcited electrons and holes but also amplifies the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 under both UV and visible light irradiation.47,49,50 To harness the full potential of TiO2, it must be tailored to absorb light within the solar spectrum, comprising 46% visible light intensity and 8% UV intensity,52 due to its abundant availability. In Ghana, for instance, the daily solar irradiation varies between 4 and 6.5 kWh/m2/day,53 emphasizing the advantage of optimizing TiO2 for utilization of this valuable resource. Furthermore, the presence of Ag nanoparticles on the TiO2 surface acts as an electron sink, effectively capturing photogenerated electrons from the conduction band of the adjacent semiconductor, owing to the Fermi level gradient.54,55 Numerous research studies have demonstrated the remarkable photocatalytic degradation capabilities of Ag-TiO2 for various environmental organic pollutants.34,47,48,56−58 In a recent study, Nyankson et al. systematically explored the Ag composition in Ag-TiO2, revealing that the photocatalytic performance peaks with 0.5 wt % Ag incorporation.34 Ag-TiO2 can be synthesized through various methods, including wet impregnation, sol−gel, coprecipitation, hydrothermal, and photo deposition techni- ques.59−65 In our current research, we have chosen to employ the photodeposition method to modify TiO2 with silver (Ag). This method is known for its effectiveness in producing TiO2- decorated silver photocatalysts.65 The photodeposition process involves mixing TiO2 particles with a silver precursor in an aqueous solution for a specified duration under UV light irradiation. This process enables the reduction of silver ions (Ag+) to form silver metal (Ag0) on the surface of TiO2. 63,65 To ensure that the Ag nanoparticles were not oxidized, alcohol was added to trap the holes generated in the TiO2 during the photodeposition process.65 It should be noted that while photocatalysis is efficient in degrading water-soluble pollutants such as aromatic fractions of crude oil, its ineffectiveness at degrading pollutants that are not soluble in water such as asphaltenes has been reported.66−69 In recent studies, Li et al.69 established that dispersants and photocatalysts can be employed synergistically for the remediation of crude oil spills. It is therefore expedient to examine further the synergy between photocatalysis and dispersants for efficient oil spill remediation. This is necessary because a combination of a photocatalyst and dispersant in a single oil spill remediation system will help in addressing the limitations associated with either of them. In addition, a photocatalyst-dispersant system will improve the photocatalytic efficiency since the dispersant will aid in the breaking down of the crude oil into droplets with a high surface area, increasing the area available for the photocatalyst to act. The nature of HNTs makes them very useful as a delivery medium for the dispersants formulated with food category surfactants with the aim of increasing the dispersant potency and reducing cost and toxicity6 as well as hosting a photocatalyst on its surface. Therefore, in this present work, a photocatalyst-dispersant composite system will be developed. The process will involve the synthesis of silver-decorated titanium dioxide (Ag-TiO2) nanoparticles via photodeposition and characterized via some analytical techniques to examine the success of the process. ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8798 http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as The Ag-TiO2 will then be loaded onto the surface of halloysite nanotubes (HNTs). This composite is termed HNT-Ag-TiO2 and will undergo additional characterization using various techniques to confirm its formation. Subsequently, a binary surfactant system composed of lecithin and tween 80 (LT80) was formulated and loaded into the lumen of the HNT in the HNT-Ag-TiO2 composite via a suction method, resulting in the formation of a new composite denoted as HNT-Ag-TiO2-(LT80). The HNT-Ag-TiO2-(LT80) composite will undergo a further characterization process to validate its successful formation. The ultimate goal of this research is to evaluate the potential of the synthesized HNT-Ag-TiO2-(LT80) composite as an efficient material for oil spill remediation. Therefore, the potential of the combined photocatalytic properties of Ag- TiO2 and the dispersant capabilities of the LT80 surfactant as an oil spill remediation material will be examined. ■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The X-ray diffraction patterns of Ag-TiO2 and HNT-Ag-TiO2 were obtained and are presented in Figure 1a. For the Ag-TiO2 particles, the crystallographic planes (101), (004), (111), (200), (105), (211), (204), (220), and (215) observed at 2θ values of 25.3°, 37.9°, 41.4°, 47.9°, 54.4°, 55°, 62.7°, 69.2°, and 74.5° are characteristic peaks of anatase TiO2 (JCPDS No. 21-1272).70−72 In addition to the characteristic peaks of anatase TiO2, the crystallographic plane (110) and (101) representing rutile TiO2 73 was observed at 2θ values of 27.4° and 36.1° respectively. The TiO2 nanoparticles used in this study are therefore a mixture of rutile and anatase TiO2. It should be mentioned that no characteristic peak of Ag was observed in the Ag-TiO2 nanoparticles and this can be attributed to the low percentage of Ag present in the Ag-TiO2 and the fact that XRD is a bulk-sensitive characterization technique.74 Again, the peak of Ag at 38.1° corresponding to (111) seems to overlap the 37.9° that corresponds to (004) of the anatase phase.47,54,75,76 From Figure 1a, the XRD pattern of the HNT-Ag-TiO2 showed the (110) characteristic peak of HNT at 2θ value of 20.3.31 In addition to the (110) peak of HNTs, all of the characteristic peaks of anatase and rutile TiO2 were detected in the XRD patterns of the HNT-Ag-TiO2. The Raman signals for both Ag-TiO2 and TiO2 are presented in Figure 1b. They both exhibit similar signals. There is the characteristic peak at 144 cm−1 followed by signals at 196, 396, 515, and 639 cm−1 attributed to the anatase phase of TiO2. 77−79 The significant difference in the Raman peaks of Ag-TiO2 and TiO2 is that the Ag-TiO2 exhibits high and broad intensities at 196, 396, 515, and at 639 cm−1 and Raman shift at 151, 96, and 639 cm−1. These observations made about the signal intensities and Raman shifts between the TiO2 and the Ag-TiO2 are due to the effect of the Ag metal deposit on the Figure 1. (a) XRD Pattern of Ag-TiO2 and HNT-Ag-TiO2 [Note: Characteristic peaks of Halloysite (o), Anatase TiO2 (*) and Rutile TiO2(#).] and (b) Raman spectra of TiO2 and Ag-TiO2. Figure 2. SEM-EDX of (a) HNT-Ag-TiO2, (b) HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80, (c) Ag-TiO2 and (d) TiO2. ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8799 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig1&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig1&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig1&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig1&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig2&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig2&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig2&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig2&ref=pdf http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as surface.78,79 It is worth noting that no specific signal pertaining to Ag nanoparticles was detected, possibly due to the relatively low concentration of silver loaded onto the TiO2 surface as well as its limited Raman scattering capability. An observation Lim et al. shares.80 The surface morphology and the elemental composition of the TiO2, Ag-TiO2, HNT-Ag-TiO2, and the surfactant-loaded HNT-Ag-TiO2 (HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80) composites were ob- tained by SEM-EDX analysis and the results displayed in Figure 2a−d. Figure 2c,d shows the SEM-EDX of the Ag-TiO2 and pure TiO2 respectively. The images showed that the morphology remained almost the same after the modification of TiO2. The Ag-TiO2 and the TiO2 particles appear to have relatively uniform sizes and spherical shapes and a large number of them agglomerated. Comparing the Ag-TiO2 and the TiO2 there appears to be a decrease in crystal size of nanoparticles after decorating the TiO2 surface with Ag. Again, Ag-TiO2 appears to form more agglomerations than the TiO2. The EDX confirms the presence of Ag in the modified TiO2 as presented in Figure 2c. In addition, the rodlike nature of the HNTs and the clusters of Ag-TiO2 are seen in both Figure 2a,b. It is observed that some clusters of Ag-TiO2 are deposited on the surfaces of the HNTs. Again, upon comparison of Figure 2a,b, it can be seen that the loading of lecithin-Tween 80 surfactants into the halloysite nanotubes did not affect the morphology of the HNT-Ag-TiO2. The EDX spectrum shows Ag, Al, Si, and Ti present in HNT-Ag-TiO2 and HNT-Ag- TiO2-LT80 as presented in Figure 2a,b. This shows the successful deposition of Ag on TiO2 to form Ag-TiO2 on the surface of HNT-Ag-TiO2 through the photodeposition method. Notably, it is evident that the introduction of LT80 into the inner lumen of the HNT using vacuum suction did not lead to the removal or alteration of Ag-TiO2 from the composite. The TGA analysis confirms the formation of the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 (see Supporting Information Figure S1a,b). The FTIR spectra of TiO2, Ag-TiO2, HNTs, HNT-Ag-TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2 loaded with Lecithin and Tween 80 (HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80) are presented in Figure 3a,b. Both the TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 presented similar spectral bands, as evidenced in Figure 3a. This observation is corroborated in the works of Durango-Giraldo et al.81 For the FTIR analysis of TiO2 (Figure 3a), the broad band between 2573 and 3714 cm−1 indicates O−H stretching mode.82 Additionally, the O− H bending mode was also observed at 1630 cm−1.61,83 These bands depict that moisture is present in the TiO2 samples. The band between 894 and 464 cm−1 represents the lattice vibration mode of Ti−O−Ti.81,82,84 Choi et al.85 also ascribe the Ti−O bond to the wavenumbers between 600 and 800 cm−1.86 The FTIR spectra in Figure 3a reveal striking distinctions between TiO2 and Ag-TiO2, particularly in the significantly heightened intensity peaks exhibited by Ag-TiO2. This enhanced intensity is clearly evident in Figure 3a, where signal intensities ranging from 2573 to 3714 cm−1 and from 464 to 894 cm−1 are compared for Ag-TiO2 and TiO2. These heightened intensities can be attributed to the incorporation of Ag within the TiO2 matrix. The presence of Ag within TiO2 led to the elongation and induction of vibrations in the Ti−O bonds, which in turn resulted in the observed intensified peaks. Mihaly Cozmuta et al.86 presents a similar line of argument. Even though the presence of the Ag in the TiO2 is not directly visible the EDX results in Figure 2a show the presence of Ag in the TiO2 matrix. The FTIR spectra of HNT are also presented in Figure 3a. The peaks observed at 3620 and 3695 cm−1 are attributed to the O−H stretching vibrations in HNTs. However, the deformation vibration of the interlayer water was observed at 1647 cm−1. The Si−O−Si stretching vibrations were observed at 1006 cm−1 while the epical Si−O stretching mode was observed at 1123 cm−1. Lastly, the deformation vibration of O−H in the lumen of the HNT was observed at 903 cm−1.87 The FTIR spectra of the HNT-Ag-TiO2 and surfactant (lecithin and Tween 80) loaded HNT-Ag-TiO2 (HNT-Ag- TiO2-LT80) are presented in Figure 3b. It can be seen that all of the bands present in the HNT and Ag-TiO2 spectra were observed in the FTIR spectra of the HNT-Ag-TiO2. However, when HNT-Ag-TiO2 was loaded with a binary mixture of lecithin and Tween 80, two additional peaks were observed at 2853 and 2962 cm−1. The peaks representing the symmetric and asymmetric stretching of CH2 were observed at 2853 and 2962 cm−1, respectively. The CH2 stretching resulted from the presence of surfactants (lecithin and Tween 80) in the composite.87 It can be seen that after loading the HNT-Ag- TiO2 with the surfactant, the Si−O−Si band shifted to a higher wavenumber, depicting a possible interaction between the Si− O−Si bond in the HNT with the functional groups present in the surfactants. The FTIR results show that the HNT-Ag-TiO2 composite was formed, and the vacuum suction method utilized in this study resulted in the loading of the surfactants into the HNTs. This is also confirmed by the multistage decomposition of the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 in the TGA analysis (see Supporting Information Figure S1a,b) Figure 3. FTIR analysis of (a) TiO2, Ag-TiO2 and HNT and (b) HNT-Ag-TiO2 and HNT-Ag-TiO2-Lecithin-Tween 80 (LT 80). ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8800 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig3&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig3&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig3&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig3&ref=pdf http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as The optical properties of TiO2, Ag-TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2 were studied by analyzing their UV−vis absorbance spectra. These UV−vis absorbance spectra data were subsequently employed to determine their respective band gaps. In addition, the diffuse reflectance spectra were examined, and the outcomes are depicted in Figure 4a−c. Figure 4a depicts the UV−vis absorption spectra of TiO2, Ag-TiO2, and the HNT-Ag-TiO2. They all show absorption wavelengths in the range of 250−800 nm. They all absorb in the UV spectrum around 250−400 nm but the Ag-TiO2 and HNT-Ag-TiO2 absorption increased appreciably when com- pared to the pristineTiO2 in the visible light spectrum beyond 400 nm. Tai et al.88 present a similar observation for the TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 in their work. This observation may be due to the charge transfer transition between the electrons of Ag and TiO2 and therefore might have contributed also to the reduction in the band gap energy89,90 as seen in Figure 4b. The Tauc plot was engaged in the estimation of the direct band gap using the relationship between (Ehν)2 and hν (eV)91 for the TiO2, Ag-TiO2, and the HN-Ag-TiO2 photocata- lysts.45,92,93 The estimated optical bandgap values as presented in Figure 4b were approximately 3.1, 2.9, and 2.8 eV for the TiO2, Ag-TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2, respectively. Evidently, the photodeposition of Ag onto TiO2 and the subsequent loading onto the HNT surface, as depicted in Figure 4b, induced a reduction in the band gap. The estimation of the band gap of the Ag-TiO2 was done in accordance with the method proposed by Makuła et al.94 The reduction in the band gap and the red shift in the absorption imply that Ag-TiO2, HNT-Ag-TiO2, and the subsequent composite, HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80, possessed the capability to absorb visible light, a significant advantage for photocatalytic applications. In addition to the foregoing, the presence of Ag on the surface of TiO2 was confirmed by the diffuse reflectance spectra presented in Figure 4c. It shows that the Ag-TiO2 and the HNT-Ag-TiO2 absorb more and so reflect less as compared to the TiO2 in the visible light due to the presence of the Ag nanoparticles on the surface of the TiO2. Further evidence of the presence of Ag nanoparticles and HNT with TiO2 in the composite was confirmed through SEM-EDX analysis, as shown in Figure 2b. Beyond the narrowed band gap, the introduction of Ag is expected to function as trapping sites or electron sinks within the TiO2 structure, effectively mitigating the recombination of electron−hole pairs and thereby enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency90,95,96 of Ag-TiO2 within the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 composite. This improvement in photocatalytic activity has been shown in Figure S5a−c found in the Supporting Information 7a−d, 8a−d and 9a−c. This enhanced photocatalytic activity resulting from the incorporation of Ag onto the TiO2 surface can be explained as follows: when the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 composite encounters organic contaminants (crude oil, aromatics, and asphaltenes), the HNT component within the composite acts as a platform, facilitating direct contact between the Ag-TiO2 particles and dispersed organic pollutants. Upon exposure to UV light, valence band electrons within the composite were excited into the conduction band. The presence of adjacent Ag nanoparticles established a lower Fermi level, enabling the efficient transfer of these photo- generated electrons. This mechanism effectively reduced the recombination of photogenerated electrons, a phenomenon widely supported by research.47,49,54,55,76,97,98 Furthermore, the creation of a Schottky barrier between the surface Ag nanoparticles and the TiO2 material constrained the recombination process, providing additional assurance against electron−hole pair recombination.99 In essence, the cluster of Ag nanoparticles on the TiO2 surface acts as an electron sink, a pivotal factor that contributed to the remarkable photocatalytic performance of the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 composite. Figure 4. (a) UV−vis absorption spectra (b) Optical band gap and (c) Diffuse reflectance spectra of Ag-TiO2, TiO2 and HNT/Ag-TiO2. ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8801 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig4&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig4&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig4&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig4&ref=pdf http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as Based on the voltammetric investigations shown in Figure 5a,b and the purpose of this study, the reduction and oxidation processes of the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80, Ag-TiO2, TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2 were investigated to examine the electron transfer initiated by UV excitations that enables reactions100 to degrade crude oil and its fractions. The cyclic voltammograms in Figure 5a,b suggest that the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80, Ag-TiO2, TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2 underwent redox reactions through photoexcitation. This means that the TiO2 and its modified forms (HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80, Ag-TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2) can induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) under UV illumination.101−103 The oxidation and reduction peaks are indicative of the interconversion of the Ti2+ and Ti4+ of the TiO2 and for the rest of the composites it was between that of the Ti and Ag.101,102 The photoexcitation generates electrons and holes in the conduction and valence bands, respectively. The holes in the valence band are able to oxidize substrates such as water or hydroxyl ions to generate hydroxyl radicals which are able to degrade organic compounds like crude oil.10,103 The two eqs 1 and 2 show the interplay between capacitance and the area of the cyclic voltammogram, respectively. =C q v/ (1) where C is capacitance, q and v represent the charge and voltage respectively, and =C A km v/2 (2) where A is area inside the CV curve, k is scan rate of cyclic voltammetry, m is active mass and Δv is the potential window/ total voltage range.104 The absolute area inside the CV curves in Figure 5a,b was estimated via Originlab 2022 to be approximately 147,396, 71,983, 37,372, and 51,729 for HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80, Ag-TiO2, TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2, respectively. Combining eqs 1 and 2, it can be inferred that Capacitance is proportional to the area of the CV curve. This means that the larger the area (A) in the CV curves, the greater the capacitance (C). From Figure 5a,b, it can be deduced that HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80, Ag-TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2 had higher capacitance than TiO2. 101 A large conductivity is associated with high capacitance which also correlates to a higher number of effective charges.105 This means TiO2 that was modified with Ag (HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80, Ag-TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2) was able to generate more effective charges than the pristine TiO2. Figure 5c shows the linear sweep voltammograms of TiO2, Ag-TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2 samples under UV light irradiation of intensity 4W. It revealed that the Ag-TiO2 and the HNT-Ag-TiO2 showed improved current concentrations of 629 and 1014 μA at (175 mV vs Ag/AgCl) under UV light irradiation, respectively. The increase in the current concen- tration is attributable to the band gap narrowing of the Ag- TiO2 and the HNT-Ag-TiO2 as depicted in Figure 4b which allowed an enhanced absorption of light (Figure 4a,c). In addition, the Ag-TiO2 and the HNT-Ag-TiO2 samples showed ∼25 and ∼40 times higher current concentration than TiO2 (25 μA) respectively, while the HNT-Ag-TiO2 showed approximately ∼2 times higher than that of the Ag-TiO2 sample measured at the same potential (175 mV vs Ag/ AgCl). The higher photocurrent concentration of the Ag-TiO2 and the HNT-Ag-TiO2 photoanode is due to the effective interfacial electron transfer due to the synergistic effect of Ag nanoparticles, TiO2, and HNTs. 106,107 The effectiveness of the HNT-Ag-TiO2 loaded with 60:40 wt % binary mixture of Lecithin: Tween 80 in dispersing spills of crude oil was analyzed using the US EPA baffled flask test at different surfactant-to-oil ratios (SOR). From Figure 6, the highest dispersion effectiveness of 91.5% is recorded at an SOR Figure 5. CV analysis of (a) TiO2, HNT-Ag-TiO2, and Ag-TiO2, (b) HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 and (c) LSV results of TiO2, Ag-TiO2 and HNT-Ag- TiO2. ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8802 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig5&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig5&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig5&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig5&ref=pdf http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as of 22.50 mg/g. Once the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 is applied to the oil−water mixture, the lecithin-Tween 80(LT) present is packed closely at the oil−water interface. The Lecithin possesses a reduced tendency to desorb strengthening the interfacial film and the Tween 80 with its large headgroup causes a repulsion between the oil droplets preventing coalescence.108 This confirms that the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 is able to effectively disperse the crude oil. This result is not surprising since the emulsion stability test (see Supporting Information, Figure S2), optical microscopy images and droplet size analysis (see Supporting Information, Figure S3) and the surface tension measurement (see Supporting Information, Figure S4) all confirmed that HNT-Ag-TiO2- LT80 has the potential to disperse spilled crude oil. It should be noted that for a dispersant to be listed on the national product contingency schedule, it should be able to record at least 45% dispersion effectiveness. The synthesized HNT-Ag- TiO2-LT80 therefore has the potential to be used as an oil spill dispersant. To further understand the photodegradation process, the GC-MS analysis was carried out on the crude oil, asphaltene fraction, and aromatic fraction of the crude oil. The GC-MS spectral results in comparison with library search were successful in enabling the identification of some compounds. Comparing the GC-MS spectra of the undegraded crude oil to the degraded crude oil at different light irradiation period (Figure 7a−d), it was observed that a significant degradation takes place in the first 7 days (Figure 7c). The degradation further increased after 14 days (Figure 7d) of light irradiation. There was a substantial difference in the chromatograms and photodegraded compounds of the crude oil when Figure 7a−d are compared. Again, comparing the degraded crude oil after 30 min (Figure 7b) and 7 days of light irradiation (Figure 7c), it can be seen that the compounds at the retention times of ca. 34 and 44 degraded after 7 days of light irradiation as indicated in Table S1b,c in the Supporting Information. Some of the pronounced peaks after 7 days of light irradiation were associated with the following compounds 1,4,4-trimethyl-2,6- diphenyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrite, Betulin, a- Amyrin, and diisooctyl phthalate as indicated in Table S1c,d. Degraded crude oil extract after 14 days of irradiation (Figure 7d) also showed degraded compounds formed and some compounds being maintained. Betulin is seen in both degraded crude oil samples after 7- and 14-days light irradiation at retention times 51.168 and 39.376 and % area of 3.72 and 2.13, respectively depicting a reduction in concentration as shown in Table S1d. a-Amyrin is seen after 7 days of light irradiation but disappeared after 14 days of light irradiation suggesting that a-Amyrin degraded after a relatively longer light irradiation. This result is consistent with the obtained UV−vis results in Figure S5c which showed significant photodegradation after 7 days of light irradiation. The undegraded and photodegraded aromatic fraction of the crude oil was also analyzed with GC-MS and the results presented in Figure 8a−d. It was observed that a significant degradation takes place in the first 7 days and with the extent of degradation increasing as irradiation time increased. The Figure 6. Dispersion effectiveness of HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 at different SOR. Figure 7. GC-MS spectra of (a) 0 min/undegraded crude oil, (b) 30 min light irradiated crude oil, (c) 7 days light irradiated crude oil, and (d) 14 days light irradiated crude oil obtained with HNT-Ag-TiO2- LT80. Figure 8. GC−MS spectra of (a) 0 min/undegraded aromatic fraction of crude oil (b) 30 min light irradiated aromatic fraction of crude oil, (c) 7 days light irradiated aromatic fraction of crude oil and (d) 14 days light irradiated aromatic fraction of crude oil obtained with HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80. ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8803 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig6&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig6&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig6&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig6&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig7&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig7&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig7&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig7&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig8&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig8&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig8&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig8&ref=pdf http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as chromatogram of the aromatic fraction irradiated for 30 min (Figure 8b) showed pronounced and distinct peaks and different compounds from that of the undegraded aromatic fraction (Figure 8a). Some of the compounds identified in undegraded aromatic fraction are Cholest-22-ene-21-ol, 3,5- dehydro-6-methoxy-, pivalate, Cyclononasiloxane, octadeca- methyl, 2-Phenylethylamine, N,N-didecyl- as shown in Table S2a in the Supporting Information. However, after 30 min of UV light irradiation new compounds such as Lup-20(29)-en-3- one, Betulin, 1-Monolinoleoylglycerol trimethylsilyl ether, 5H- Cyclopropa[3,4]benz[1,2-e]azulen-5-one, 9,9a-bis(acetyloxy)- 3-[(acetyloxy)methyl]-2-chloro-1. It should be stated that Heptasiloxane and hexadecamethyl were identified in both Figure 8a,b and also indicated in Table S2b in the Supporting Information. Comparing the degraded aromatics after 30 min and 7 days of light irradiation in Figure 8b,c, respectively, it can be seen that degraded compounds appeared after 7 days of light irradiation. The degraded compounds identified in Figure 8c as indicated by Table S2c in the Supporting Information were diisooctyl phthalate, pregna-5,7-diene,3-(methoxymethoxy)- 20-formyl, 5aH-3a,12-Methano-1H-cyclopropa[5′,6′]- cyclodeca[1′,2′:1,5]cyclopenta[1,2-d][1,3]dioxol-13-one, 1a,2 and 1H-Cyclopropa[3,4]benz[1,2-e]azulene-5,7b,9,9a-tetro- l,1a,1b,4,4a,5,7a,8,9-octahydro-3-(hydroxyme). Lup-20(29)- en-3-one was identified in both Figure 9b,c and also Table S2b,c in the Supporting Information. Betulin which was present after 30 min irradiation disappeared after 7 days of light irradiation as indicated in Table S2c in the Supporting Information. Aromatic fraction after 14 days of irradiation (Figure 8d) showed significant degradation accompanied by the formation of new compounds such as psi-Carotene, 1,1′,2,2′-tetrahydro- 1,1′-dimethoxy, 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid and 2,3-bis- [(trimethylsilyl)oxy] propyl ester. Again, heptasiloxane and hexadecamethyl are identified in Figure 8d as shown in Table S2d in the Supporting Information, implying that these compounds were not susceptible to photodegradation. The degradation trend of the asphaltenes follows the same pattern as those of crude oil and aromatic fractions of crude oil are presented in Figure 9a−c. As the degradation progresses from 0 min to the seventh day irradiation time, significant degradation takes place with intermediates photodegradation products forming. The differences in the chromatograms and the compounds formed between the undegraded asphaltenes (Figure 9a) and the asphaltenes irradiated for 30 min (Figure 9b) were observed. After 7-day irradiation of the asphaltenes, Figure 9c and Table S3c in the Supporting Information show that Betulin, Heptasiloxane, hexadecamethyl, Lup-20(29)-en- 3-one, a-̀Amyrin and trimethylsilyl ether found in Figure 9a,b and Table S3a,b in the Supporting Information disappeared, implying that the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 was effective in photodegrading the asphaltene fraction of crude oil. On the other hand, cyclononasiloxane, octadecamethyl, diisooctyl phthalate, and 1,4,4-trimethyl-2,6-diphenyl-1,4-dihy- dropyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile photodegradation intermediate compounds were formed. Propanoic acid, 2-(3-acetoxy-4,4,14- trimethylandrost-8-en-17-yl), is seen in both undegraded and 7-day irradiated asphaltene fractions, as indicated in Table S3a,c in the Supporting Information, implying that these compounds could not be photodegraded. The results from the GC-MS analysis showed that HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 was effective in degrading crude oil and aromatic and asphaltene fractions of crude oil. ■ CONCLUSIONS In this study, a photocatalyst-dispersant system of halloysite nanotube-silver nanoparticles with titanium dioxide, lecithin, and tween 80 (HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80) has been developed. The system was characterized with UV−vis analysis, Raman, TGA, CV, LSV, as well as SEM−EDX imaging, and FTIR spectroscopy was adopted to determine the presence of Ag in the photocatalyst. The HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 exhibited an impressive 91.5% dispersion effectiveness in the baffled flask test, reducing surface tension and forming stable emulsions with smaller oil droplets. UV-induced photodegradation of crude oil, aromatic, and asphaltene fractions was evident, revealing the composite’s potential for oil spill remediation. ■ EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Materials. Dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt (DOSS, 98%), Tween 80, dodecane, methanol, halloysite nanotubes, isopropyl alcohol, AgNO3, ethanol, and TiO2 nanoparticles were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, UK. Instant Ocean salt was obtained from Instant Ocean (Blacksburg, VA). Deionized (DI) water, produced using the Elga water purification system (Medica DV25), possessing 18.2MΩ resistance, was employed in all the experimental engagements. Agbami crude oil with a density of 786.0 kg/m3, API gravity of 48.4 at 15 °C and density of 781.0 kg/m3 at 21.6 °C was obtained from Tema Oil Refinery (TOR), Tema, Ghana. Preparation of HNT-Ag-TiO2 Composite (Ex-Situ Preparation). The ex-situ preparation was in two parts. The first part (Part 1) was the synthesis of Ag-TiO2 via photodeposition, and the second part (Part 2). (Part 1): A solution named (A) was prepared by adding 0.5 wt % of Ag Figure 9. GC−MS spectra of (a) 0 min undegraded asphaltene fraction of crude oil (b) 30 min light irradiated asphaltene fraction of crude oil and (c) 7 days light irradiated asphaltene fraction of crude oil obtained with HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80. ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8804 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig9&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig9&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig9&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?fig=fig9&ref=pdf http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as from AgNO3 to 50 mL of ethanol. Another solution (B) was formed by dispersing 1 g of TiO2 in 200 mL of deionized water. The solution that resulted was subjected to UV irradiation for 2 h. After it was centrifuged for 15 min and subjected to a 5 h drying at 105 °C. The as−prepared Ag-TiO2 was grounded with a mortar and pistol and sieved with a 75 μm sieve. (Part 2): The as-prepared Ag-TiO2 was then loaded onto the HNT surface in this manner. A known amount (1 g) of halloysite nanotubes (HNTS) was added to 50 mL of ethanol and subjected to sonication for 60 min. The resulting mixture was labeled (C). Solution (C) was immediately added to the solution (D) made up of 1 g of Ag-TiO2 dispersed in 200 mL of deionized water and subjected to 1 h stirring in the dark. The resultant solution was then centrifuged for 15 min and subjected to a 5-h drying at 105 °C. The as-prepared HNT-Ag- TiO2 was grounded with a mortar and pistol and sieved with a 75 μm sieve. Loading of HNT-Ag-TiO2 with Lecithin and Tween 80 (LT80). A calculated amount (0.5 g) of HNT-Ag-TiO2 was weighed into a round-bottomed flask. A 20 mg/mL surfactant- ethanol solution was prepared using 20 wt % of the surfactant (lecithin−Tween 80 in 60 wt %: 40 wt %.). The HNT-Ag- TiO2-surfactant solution was subjected to continuous stirring for 30 and 1 min sonication. Vacuum suction was applied to load the binary surfactant mixture into the lumen of the HNTs. The vacuum suction was done in a repeated fashion for 15 min per session. This repeated session was done three times. The resulting HNT-Ag-TiO2 loaded surfactant was allowed to dry in order to evaporate the residual ethanol for the surfactant to crystallize in the HNT-Ag-TiO2. This composite made up of the photocatalyst and dispersant was labeled as HNT-Ag-TiO2- LT80 Characterization. X-ray Diffraction (XRD). The crystal structure of Ag-TiO2 and HNTs-Ag-TiO2 particles were analyzed by employing the services of the X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) technique. The XRD characterization made use of a Bruker D8 X-ray diffractometer in theta−theta configuration with anode material Cu K-Alpha1 (wavelength of 1.54060 Å) and generator settings (40 mA, 45 kV). The XRD patterns of each of the randomly oriented powder specimens were captured in the 2θ range of 20°- 70° with a step size of 0.017°. Raman Spectroscopy. Raman spectra of the TiO2 and the Ag-TiO2was acquired with uRaman/uSight version 11 with laser excitation at 531.89 nm. Scanning Electron Microscopy−Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM−EDX). The services of a scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) on a FEI Tecnai G2 F30 twin transmission electron microscope was engaged for the analyses of the elemental composition and morphology of the TiO2, Ag-TiO2, HNT-Ag- TiO2 and the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80. It was operated at 300 kV. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. The FTIR spectra analysis of the TiO2, Ag-TiO2, HNT, HNT- Ag-TiO2 and HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 was done by engaging the Vertex 70 v (Bruker) FTIR spectrometer in transmission mode. This was carried out in a wavenumber range of 4000− 400 cm−1 with 4 cm−1 resolution. The data analysis was performed using Opus software. Thermalgravimetric Analysis (TGA). The TA Instruments SDT 2960 Simultaneous DTA−TGA was engaged for TGA of the HNT, Ag-TiO2, HNT-Ag-TiO2 and HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80. The analysis was carried out in an air environment using a 10 °C/min heating rate. UV−Vis Spectroscopy. The UV−vis spectrometer was employed for the measurement of the absorbance and the diffuse reflectance of the HNT-Ag-TiO2, Ag-TiO2, and TiO2. The Tauc plot was then used to generate the band gap energies of the samples. In addition, UV−vis was also used to analyze the photodegraded oil samples. Linear Sweep Voltammetry (LSV) and Cyclic Voltammetry (CV). A cheapstat potentiostat connected to a desktop was engaged for the measurements of the linear sweep (LSV) and cyclic voltammetry (CV). CV measurement was used to evaluate the charge concentrations generated by the samples. The sensor of the potentiostat-galvanostat used is made up of a carbon electrode. A dispersed solution of 10 mg each of TiO2, Ag-TiO2, HNT-Ag-TiO2, and HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 was achieved by dissolving them in 200 mL of deionized water. The resultant solutions were irradiated with a UV light source for 2 h. After the irradiation, 5 μL of each of the aqueous samples was taken for the examination of their electrochemical performance by making use of Ag/AgCl as a reference electrode. The CV was achieved through a 160 mV/s constant scan rate with the potential window being −200 to 900 mV (vs Ag/AgCl). The LSV was set to 10 s at a sweep rate of 10 mV/s with a voltage range of −80 to 200 mV. Baffled Flask Test. In the evaluation of the dispersion effectiveness of the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80, the baffled flask test was used; 120 mL of synthetic seawater was poured into a baffled flask. The addition of 100 μL of crude oil to the surface of the seawater in the baffled flask was carried out gently. Different amounts of the HNT-Ag-TiO2-LT80 corresponding to different surfactant-to-oil ratios (SOR) were added directly to the oil (crude oil, asphaltenes, or aromatic fractions) and seawater in the baffled flask. The baffled flask with the seawater, oil, and photocatalyst-dispersant composite was put on a VWR advanced digital shaker, Model 3500 and operated at 200 rpm for 10 min and afterward allowed to settle for 10 min. Thirty milliliters of the aqueous media of the dispersed oil was collected and the crude oil extraction was achieved with the aid of 20 mL of DCM. The crude oil in DCM was quantified using UV−vis set to an absorbance difference of 300−400 nm. The foregoing was carried out at room temperature. ■ ASSOCIATED CONTENT Data Availability Statement The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. *sı Supporting Information The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982. Additional experimental details covering fractionation of the crude oil using column chromatography; preparation of the synthetic sea salt; optical microscopy of emulsions; measurement of surface tension; photo- catalysis of the crude oil and the fractionated crude oil; GC−MS analysis; some results covering TGA analyses, emulsion stability analyses; optical microscopy images and histogram of o/w emulsion droplet sizes; surface tension; UV−vis analyses of the photodegraded products and the tables showing GC-MS identified ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8805 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?goto=supporting-info http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as compounds and their retention times for the photo- degraded crude oil; and aromatics and asphaltenes (PDF) ■ AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author Emmanuel Nyankson − Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ghana, LG 77 Accra, Ghana; orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-3466; Email: enyankson@ ug.edu.gh Authors Selassie Gbogbo − Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ghana, LG 77 Accra, Ghana; orcid.org/0009-0006-2458-6423 Benjamin Agyei-Tuffour − Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ghana, LG 77 Accra, Ghana Yaw Kwakye Adofo − Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ghana, LG 77 Accra, Ghana; orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-4997 Bismark Mensah − Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ghana, LG 77 Accra, Ghana Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 Author Contributions All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by E.N., B.A.-T., S.G., Y.K.A., and B.M. The first draft of the manuscript was written by E.N. and S.G. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Funding The authors declare that this project was funded by the University of Ghana BANGA-Africa program with funding from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Notes The authors declare no competing financial interest. All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper and will take public responsibility for its content. The paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. ■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project was funded by the University of Ghana BANGA- Africa programme (Team research grant) with funding from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. ■ REFERENCES (1) Agyei-Tuffour, B.; Gbogbo, S.; Dodoo-Arhin, D.; Damoah, L. N. W.; Efavi, J. K.; Yaya, A.; et al. Photocatalytic degradation of fractionated crude oil: potential application in oil spill remediation. Cogent Eng. 2020, 7 (1), No. 1744944. (2) Nyankson, E.; Rodene, D.; Gupta, R. B. Advancements in Crude Oil Spill Remediation Research After the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Water Air Soil Pollut [Internet]. 2016, 227 (1), 29. (3) Pi, G.; Li, Y.; Bao, M.; Mao, L.; Gong, H.; Wang, Z. Novel and Environmentally Friendly Oil Spill Dispersant Based on the Synergy of Biopolymer Xanthan Gum and Silica Nanoparticles. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng. 2016, 4 (6), 3095−102. (4) Nyankson, E.; DeCuir, J. M.; Gupta, B. R. Soybean Lecithin as a Dispersant for Crude Oil Spills. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2015, 3 (5), 920−31. (5) Nyankson, E.; DeCuir, M. J.; Gupta, R. B. Soybean Lecithin as a Dispersant for Crude Oil Spills. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng. 2015, 3 (5), 920−31. (6) Nyankson, E.; Olasehinde, O.; John, V. T.; Gupta, R. B. Surfactant-Loaded Halloysite Clay Nanotube Dispersants for Crude Oil Spill Remediation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. [Internet]. 2015, 54 (38), 9328−41. (7) Doshi, B.; Sillanpää, M.; Kalliola, S. A review of bio-based materials for oil spill treatment. Water Res. 2018, 135, 262−277. (8) Gupta, S.; Tai, N. H. Carbon materials as oil sorbents: A review on the synthesis and performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1550. (9) Jiang, Z. R.; Ge, J.; Zhou, Y. X.; Wang, Z. U.; Chen, D.; Yu, S. H.; et al. Coating sponge with a hydrophobic porous coordination polymer containing a low-energy CF3-decorated surface for continuous pumping recovery of an oil spill from water. NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8 (3), No. e253. (10) Mills, A.; Le Hunte, S. An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 1997, 108 (1), 1−35. (11) Rueda-Marquez, J. J.; Levchuk, I.; Fernández Ibañez, P.; Sillanpää, M. A critical review on application of photocatalysis for toxicity reduction of real wastewaters. J. Clean Prod. 2020, 258, No. 120694. (12) Mathew, S.; Ganguly, P.; Kumaravel, V.; Bartlett, J.; Pillai, S. C. Solar light-induced photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment. Nano-Materials as Photocatalysts for Degradation of Environmental Pollutants: Challenges and Possibilities. 2020, 65−78. (13) Su, Y.; Chang, Q.; Xue, C.; Yang, J.; Hu, S. Solar-irradiated carbon dots as high-density hot spots in sponge for high-efficiency cleanup of viscous crude oil spill. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10 (2), 585. (14) Ge, J.; Shi, L. A.; Wang, Y. C.; Zhao, H. Y.; Yao, H. B.; Zhu, Y. B.; et al. Joule-heated graphene-wrapped sponge enables fast clean-up of viscous crude-oil spill. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12 (5), 434. (15) Chang, J.; Shi, Y.; Wu, M.; Li, R.; Shi, L.; Jin, Y.; et al. Solar- assisted fast cleanup of heavy oil spills using a photothermal sponge. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2018, 6 (19), 9192−9. (16) Kujawinski, E. B.; Kido Soule, M. C.; Valentine, D. L.; Boysen, A. K.; Longnecker, K.; Redmond, M. C. Fate of dispersants associated with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (4), 1298−306. (17) Cai, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, B.; Lee, K.; Nedwed, T. J.; Greer, C.; et al. A cross-comparison of biosurfactants as marine oil spill dispersants: Governing factors, synergetic effects and fates. J. Hazard Mater. 2021, 416, No. 126122. (18) Bælum, J.; Borglin, S.; Chakraborty, R.; Fortney, J. L.; Lamendella, R.; Mason, O. U.; et al. Deep-sea bacteria enriched by oil and dispersant from the Deepwater Horizon spill. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14 (9), 2405−16. (19) Hazen, T. C.; Dubinsky, E. A.; DeSantis, T. Z.; Andersen, G. L.; Piceno, Y. M.; Singh, N.; et al. Deep-sea oil plume enriches indigenous oil-degrading bacteria. Science 2010, 330 (6001), 204−8. (20) Prince, R. C.; McFarlin, K. M.; Butler, J. D.; Febbo, E. J.; Wang, F. C. Y.; Nedwed, T. J. The primary biodegradation of dispersed crude oil in the sea. Chemosphere. 2013, 90 (2), 521−6. (21) Prince, R. C.; Amande, T. J.; McGenity, T. J. Taxonomy, Genomics and Ecophysiology of Hydrocarbon-Degrading Microbes. In Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology; 2018. (22) Chandrasekar, S.; Sorial, G. A.; Weaver, J. W. Dispersant effectiveness on oil spills - impact of salinity. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2006, 63 (8), 1418−30. (23) Nyankson, E.; Demir, M.; Gonen, M.; Gupta, R. B. Interfacially Active Hydroxylated Soybean Lecithin Dispersant for Crude Oil Spill Remediation. ACS Sustain Chem. Eng. 2016, 4 (4), 2056−67. (24) Owoseni, O., Nyankson, E., Zhang, Y., DAJ of C. Interfacial adsorption and surfactant release characteristics of magnetically function- alized halloysite nanotubes for responsive emulsions; Elsevier, 2016 (undefined). ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8806 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982/suppl_file/ao3c05982_si_001.pdf https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Emmanuel+Nyankson"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-3466 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-3466 mailto:enyankson@ug.edu.gh mailto:enyankson@ug.edu.gh https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Selassie+Gbogbo"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2458-6423 https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2458-6423 https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Benjamin+Agyei-Tuffour"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Yaw+Kwakye+Adofo"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-4997 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8174-4997 https://pubs.acs.org/action/doSearch?field1=Contrib&text1="Bismark+Mensah"&field2=AllField&text2=&publication=&accessType=allContent&Earliest=&ref=pdf https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1744944 https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1744944 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2727-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2727-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2727-5 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00063?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00063?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00063?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00027?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00027?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00027?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00027?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02032?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02032?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.034 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.034 https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA08321D https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA08321D https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2016.22 https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2016.22 https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2016.22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(97)00118-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-6030(97)00118-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120694 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120694 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818598-8.00004-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818598-8.00004-3 https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA08670G https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA08670G https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA08670G https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.33 https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.33 https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA00779A https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA00779A https://doi.org/10.1021/es103838p?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/es103838p?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126122 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02780.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02780.x https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195979 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195979 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.08.020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.08.020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.04.019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.04.019 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01403?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01403?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01403?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as (25) Efavi, J. K.; Nyankson, E.; Yaya, A.; Agyei-Tuffour, B. Effect of Magnesium and Sodium Salts on the Interfacial Characteristics of Soybean Lecithin Dispersants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56 (44), 12608−20. (26) Yuewen, D.; Adzigbli, L. Assessing the Impact of Oil Spills on Marine Organisms. J. Oceanogr. Mar. Res. 2018, 6, 1. (27) Abdel-Shafy, H. I.; Mansour, M. S. M. A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egyptian journal of petroleum. 2016, 25 (1), 107−23. (28) Fowzia, A.; Fakhruddin, A. N. M. A review on environmental contamination of petroleum hydrocarbons and its biodegradation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 2018, 11 (3), No. 555811. (29) Khan, M. A. I.; Biswas, B.; Smith, E.; Naidu, R.; Megharaj, M. Toxicity assessment of fresh and weathered petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soil-a review. Chemosphere. 2018, 212, 755−67. (30) Logeshwaran, P.; Megharaj, M.; Chadalavada, S.; Bowman, M.; Naidu, R. Petroleum hydrocarbons (PH) in groundwater aquifers: An overview of environmental fate, toxicity, microbial degradation and risk-based remediation approaches. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2018, 10, 175−93. (31) Nyankson, E.; Kumar, R. V. Removal of water-soluble dyes and pharmaceutical wastes by combining the photocatalytic properties of Ag3PO4 with the adsorption properties of halloysite nanotubes. Mater. Today Adv. 2019, 4, No. 100025. (32) Som, I.; Roy, M.; Saha, R. Advances in Nanomaterial-based Water Treatment Approaches for Photocatalytic Degradation of Water Pollutants. ChemCatChem. 2020, 12 (13), 3409−33. (33) Gopinath, K. P.; Madhav, N. V.; Krishnan, A.; Malolan, R.; Rangarajan, G. Present applications of titanium dioxide for the photocatalytic removal of pollutants from water: A review. J. Environ. Manage. 2020, 270, No. 110906. (34) Nyankson, E.; Yeboah, N.; Jnr, S. O.; Onaja, S.; Mensah, T.; Efavi, J. K. The effect of synthesis route on the photocatalytic performance of Ag-TiO2 using rhodamine b dyes, pesticides, and pharmaceutical waste as model pollutants. Mater. Res. Express. 2022, 9 (9), No. 094001. (35) Saravanan, A.; Kumar, P. S.; Jeevanantham, S.; Anubha, M.; Jayashree, S. Degradation of toxic agrochemicals and pharmaceutical pollutants: Effective and alternative approaches toward photocatalysis. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 298, No. 118844. (36) Akhter, P.; Nawaz, S.; Shafiq, I.; Nazir, A.; Shafique, S.; Jamil, F.; et al. Efficient visible light assisted photocatalysis using ZnO/TiO2 nanocomposites. Molecular Catalysis. 2023, 535, No. 112896. (37) Li, M.; Yin, J. J.; Wamer, W. G.; Lo, Y. M. Mechanistic characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticle-induced toxicity using electron spin resonance. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014, 22 (1), 76− 85. (38) Shang, F. K.; Li, Y. H.; Qi, M. Y.; Tang, Z. R.; Xu, Y. J. Photocatalytic materials for sustainable chemistry via cooperative photoredox catalysis. Catal. Today. 2023, 410, 85−101. (39) Thind, S. S.; Paul, M.; Hayden, J. B.; Joshi, A.; Goodlett, D.; McIndoe, J. S. A highly efficient photocatalytic system for environ- mental applications based on TiO 2 nanomaterials. Industrial Chemistry & Materials. 2023, 1 (3), 431−42. (40) Qi, M. Y.; Conte, M.; Anpo, M.; Tang, Z. R.; Xu, Y. J. Cooperative coupling of oxidative organic synthesis and hydrogen production over semiconductor-based photocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121 (21), 13051−85. (41) Du, Y.; Fu, Y.; Gao, X.; He, W.; Zheng, P. Halloysite-{TiO}2- Ag composites: Preparation, characterization and photodegradation. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 729 (1), No. 012087. (42) Eddy, D. R.; Permana, M. D.; Sakti, L. K.; Sheha, G. A. N.; Hidayat, S.; Solihudin.; et al. Heterophase polymorph of TiO2 (Anatase, Rutile, Brookite, TiO2 (B)) for efficient photocatalyst: fabrication and activity. Nanomaterials 2023, 13 (4), 704. (43) Chen, D.; Cheng, Y.; Zhou, N.; Chen, P.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; et al. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants using TiO2-based photocatalysts: A review. J. Clean Prod. 2020, 268, No. 121725. (44) Ishigaki, T.; Nakada, Y.; Tarutani, N.; Uchikoshi, T.; Tsujimoto, Y.; Isobe, M.; et al. Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity of anatase-rutile mixed-phase nano-size powder given by high- temperature heat treatment. R Soc. Open Sci. 2020, 7 (1), No. 191539. (45) Isari, A. A.; Payan, A.; Fattahi, M.; Jorfi, S.; Kakavandi, B. Photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B and real textile wastewater using Fe-doped TiO2 anchored on reduced graphene oxide (Fe- TiO2/rGO): Characterization and feasibility, mechanism and path- way studies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 462, 549−64. (46) Gupta, J., Hassan, P. A., Barick, K. C. Defects in nanomaterials for visible light photocatalysis. In: Nanostructured Materials for Visible Light Photocatalysis; Elsevier: 2022; pp 319−350. (47) Narkbuakaew, T.; Sujaridworakun, P. Role of Ag (0) deposited on TiO2 nanoparticles for superior photocatalytic performance induced by calcination. Opt Mater. (Amst). 2019, 98, No. 109407. (48) Tseng, H. C.; Chen, Y. W. Facile synthesis of Ag/TiO2 by photoreduction method and its degradation activity of methylene blue under UV and visible light irradiation. Mod. Res. Catal. 2019, 9 (1), 1−19. (49) Liang, H.; Jia, Z.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, J. Photocatalysis oxidation activity regulation of Ag/TiO2 composites evaluated by the selective oxidation of Rhodamine B. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 422, 1−10. (50) Albiter, E.; Valenzuela, M. A.; Alfaro, S.; Valverde-Aguilar, G.; Martínez-Pallares, F. M. Photocatalytic deposition of Ag nanoparticles on TiO2: Metal precursor effect on the structural and photoactivity properties. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2015, 19 (5), 563−73. (51) Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Tao, J.; Gong, Z.; Cheng, Y.; et al. Silver-decorated TiO2 nanorod array films with enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic properties. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163 (10), H943. (52) Sterhov, A. I., Loshkarev, I. Y. Determination of the proportion of natural light in solar radiation using the method of conversion of lighting units into energy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: 2019; p 012002. (53) Odoi-Yorke, F.; Akpahou, R.; Opoku, R.; Mensah, L. D. Technical, financial, and emissions analyses of solar water heating systems for supplying sustainable energy for hotels in Ghana. Solar Compass. 2023, 7, No. 100051. (54) Ortiz, A. L.; Zaragoza, M. M.; Gutiérrez, J. S.; da Silva Paula, M. M.; Collins-Martínez, V. Silver oxidation state effect on the photocatalytic properties of Ag doped TiO2 for hydrogen production under visible light. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40 (48), 17308− 17315. (55) Stucchi, M.; Bianchi, C. L.; Argirusis, C.; Pifferi, V.; Neppolian, B.; Cerrato, G.; et al. Ultrasound assisted synthesis of Ag-decorated TiO2 active in visible light. Ultrason Sonochem. 2018, 40, 282−8. (56) Zhang, Y.; Fu, F.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Chen, Y. One-step synthesis of Ag@ TiO2 nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Nanomaterials. 2018, 8 (12), 1032. (57) Zhu, Y.; Yang, S.; Cai, J.; Meng, M.; Li, X. A facile synthesis of AgxAu1− x/TiO2 photocatalysts with tunable surface plasmon resonance (SPR) frequency used for RhB photodegradation. Mater. Lett. 2015, 154, 163−6. (58) Pascariu, P.; Cojocaru, C.; Airinei, A.; Olaru, N.; Rosca, I.; Koudoumas, E.; et al. Innovative ag−tio2 nanofibers with excellent photocatalytic and antibacterial actions. Catalysts. 2021, 11 (10), 1234. (59) Naik, B.; Manoratne, C. H.; Chandrashekhar, A.; Iyer, A.; Prasad, V. S.; Ghosh, N. N. Preparation of TiO2, Ag-doped TiO2 nanoparticle and TiO2−SBA-15 nanocomposites using simple aqueous solution-based chemical method and study of their photocatalytical activity. J. Exp Nanosci. 2013, 8 (4), 462−79. (60) Harikishore, M.; Sandhyarani, M.; Venkateswarlu, K.; Nellaippan, T. A.; Rameshbabu, N. Effect of Ag doping on antibacterial and photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline TiO2. Procedia materials science. 2014, 6, 557−66. (61) Sarteep, Z.; Ebrahimian Pirbazari, A.; Aroon, M. A. Silver doped TiO2 nanoparticles: preparation, characterization and efficient ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8807 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02862?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02862?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02862?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.4172/2572-3103.1000179 https://doi.org/10.4172/2572-3103.1000179 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011 https://doi.org/10.19080/IJESNR.2018.11.555811 https://doi.org/10.19080/IJESNR.2018.11.555811 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.094 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.094 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2018.02.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2018.02.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2018.02.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2019.100025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2019.100025 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2019.100025 https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201902081 https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201902081 https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201902081 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110906 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110906 https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac871f https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac871f https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac871f https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118844 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118844 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112896 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112896 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2022.04.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2022.04.007 https://doi.org/10.1039/D3IM00053B https://doi.org/10.1039/D3IM00053B https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00197?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00197?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/729/1/012087 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/729/1/012087 https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13040704 https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13040704 https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13040704 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121725 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121725 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191539 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191539 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191539 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109407 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109407 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109407 https://doi.org/10.4236/mrc.2020.91001 https://doi.org/10.4236/mrc.2020.91001 https://doi.org/10.4236/mrc.2020.91001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.211 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.211 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.211 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2015.05.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2015.05.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2015.05.009 https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0551610jes https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0551610jes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solcom.2023.100051 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solcom.2023.100051 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.058 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.058 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.058 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.07.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.07.016 https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8121032 https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8121032 https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8121032 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.04.091 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.04.091 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.04.091 https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11101234 https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11101234 https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2011.597435 https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2011.597435 https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2011.597435 https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2011.597435 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.071 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.071 https://doi.org/10.7508/jwent.2016.02.007 https://doi.org/10.7508/jwent.2016.02.007 http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as degradation of 2, 4-dichlorophenol under visible light. J. Water Environ. Nanotechnol. 2016, 1 (2), 135−144. (62) Zhang, D.; Chen, J.; Xiang, Q.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Liao, Y. Transition-metal-ion (Fe, Co, Cr, Mn, Etc.) doping of TiO2 nanotubes: a general approach. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58 (19), 12511−5. (63) Wenderich, K.; Mul, G. Methods, mechanism, and applications of photodeposition in photocatalysis: a review. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116 (23), 14587−619. (64) Abbad, S.; Guergouri, K.; Gazaout, S.; Djebabra, S.; Zertal, A.; Barille, R.; et al. Effect of silver doping on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanopowders synthesized by the sol-gel route. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8 (3), No. 103718. (65) Chakhtouna, H.; Benzeid, H.; Zari, N.; El Qaiss, A.; Bouhfid, R. Recent progress on Ag/TiO2 photocatalysts: Photocatalytic and bactericidal behaviors. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 44638− 44666. (66) Saleh, T. A.; Gupta, V. K. Photo-catalyzed degradation of hazardous dye methyl orange by use of a composite catalyst consisting of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and titanium dioxide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 371 (1), 101−6. (67) Saleh, T. A.; Tuzen, M.; Sarı, A. Magnetic activated carbon loaded with tungsten oxide nanoparticles for aluminum removal from waters. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5 (3), 2853−60. (68) Alansi, A. M.; Al-Qunaibit, M.; Alade, I. O.; Qahtan, T. F.; Saleh, T. A. Visible-light responsive BiOBr nanoparticles loaded on reduced graphene oxide for photocatalytic degradation of dye. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 253, 297−304. (69) Li, C.; Yan, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Bao, M.; Dong, L. TiO2@ palygorskite composite for the efficient remediation of oil spills via a dispersion-photodegradation synergy. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2021, 15, 72. (70) Zhou, L.; Wang, L.; Lei, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J. Fabrication of TiO2/Co-g-C3N4 heterojunction catalyst and its photocatalytic performance. Catal. Commun. 2017, 89, 125−8. (71) Li, J.; Liu, K.; Xue, J.; Xue, G.; Sheng, X.; Wang, H.; et al. CQDs preluded carbon-incorporated 3D burger-like hybrid ZnO enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity and mechanism implication. J. Catal. 2019, 369, 450−61. (72) Bellucci, S.; Nyankson, E.; Agyei-Tuffour, B.; Adjasoo, J.; Ebenezer, A.; Dodoo-Arhin, D.; Yaya, A.; et al. Synthesis and Application of Fe-Doped TiO2-Halloysite Nanotubes Composite and Their Potential Application in Water Treatment. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 2019, No. 4270310. (73) Dodoo-Arhin, D.; Buabeng, F. P.; Mwabora, J. M.; Amaniampong, P. N.; Agbe, H.; Nyankson, E.; et al. The effect of titanium dioxide synthesis technique and its photocatalytic degrada- tion of organic dye pollutants. Heliyon. 2018, 4 (7), No. e00681. (74) Nyankson, E.; Amedalor, R.; Chandrabose, G.; Coto, M.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Kumar, R. V. Microwave-and formaldehyde- assisted synthesis of Ag−Ag3PO4 with enhanced photocatalytic activity for the degradation of rhodamine B dye and crude oil fractions. ACS Omega. 2020, 5 (23), 13641−55. (75) Wen, L.; Liu, B.; Liu, C.; Zhao, X. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic property of Ag-loaded TiO2 powders using photodeposition method. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology- Mater. Sci. Ed [Internet]. 2009, 24 (2), 258−63. (76) Lee, D. S.; Chen, Y. W. Nano Ag/TiO2 catalyst prepared by chemical deposition and its photocatalytic activity. J. Taiwan Inst Chem. Eng. 2014, 45 (2), 705−12. (77) Zambon, R.; Franca, M.; Zani, V.; Pilot, R.; Gross, S.; Pedron, D.; et al. Ag/TiO2 Nanocomposites for Nanothermometry in the Biological Environment. Eng. Proc. 2023, 35 (1), 16. (78) Díaz-Uribe, C.; Viloria, J.; Cervantes, L.; Vallejo, W.; Navarro, K.; Romero, E.; et al. Photocatalytic activity of Ag-TiO2 composites deposited by photoreduction under UV irradiation. Int. J. Photoenergy 2018, 2018, No. 6080432. (79) Leong, K. H.; Gan, B. L.; Ibrahim, S.; Saravanan, P. Synthesis of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) triggered Ag/TiO2 photocatalyst for degradation of endocrine disturbing compounds. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 319, 128−35. (80) Lim, S. P.; Shahid, M. M.; Rameshkumar, P.; Huang, N. M.; Che, L. Amperometric detection of hydrogen peroxide and its density functional theory for adsorption on Ag/TiO 2 nanohybrid. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 2020, 31, 6017−26. (81) Durango-Giraldo, G.; Cardona, A.; Zapata, J. F.; Santa, J. F.; Buitrago-Sierra, R. Titanium dioxide modified with silver by two methods for bactericidal applications. Heliyon 2019, 5 (5), No. e01608. (82) Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Ho, W.; Zhang, L.; Zou, Z.; Lee, S. Biomolecule-controlled hydrothermal synthesis of C−N−S-tridoped TiO2 nanocrystalline photocatalysts for NO removal under simulated solar light irradiation. J. Hazard Mater. 2009, 169 (1−3), 77−87. (83) Alsharaeh, E. H.; Bora, T.; Soliman, A.; Ahmed, F.; Bharath, G.; Ghoniem, M. G.; et al. Sol-gel-assisted microwave-derived synthesis of anatase Ag/TiO2/GO nanohybrids toward efficient visible light phenol degradation. Catalysts. 2017, 7 (5), 133. (84) Serrano, J. G.; Hernandez, E. G.; Fernandez, M. O.; Pal, U. Effect of Ag Doping on the Crystallization and Phase Transition of TiO2 NPs. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2009, 9, 1097−1105. (85) Choi, S. S.; Chu, B.; Lee, S. G.; Lee, S. W.; Im, S. S.; Kim, S. H.; et al. Titania-doped silica fibers prepared by electrospinning and sol- gel process. J. Solgel Sci. Technol. 2004, 30, 215−21. (86) Mihaly Cozmuta, A.; Peter, A.; Mihaly Cozmuta, L.; Nicula, C.; Crisan, L.; Baia, L.; et al. Active packaging system based on Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite used for extending the shelf life of bread. Chemical and microbiological investigations. Packaging Technology and Science. 2015, 28 (4), 271−84. (87) Nyankson, E.; Olasehinde, O.; John, V. T.; Gupta, R. B. Surfactant-Loaded Halloysite Clay Nanotube Dispersants for Crude Oil Spill Remediation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54 (38), 9328−41. (88) Tai, L. N.; Long, P. D.; Le, H.; Thi, N.; Van Hong, L.; Khuyen, B. X.; et al. Photocatalytic and water-splitting properties of TiO2 and Ag−TiO2 films in the visible light region. AIP Adv. 2021, 11 (7), No. 075118. (89) Vinu, R.; Madras, G. Photocatalytic activity of Ag-substituted and impregnated nano-TiO2. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2009, 366 (1), 130− 40. (90) Sukitpong, J, Chiarakorn, S. Degradation of acetaldehyde by Ag/TiO2 photocatalyst coated on polyester air filter. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: 2019; p 012020. (91) Jubu, P. R.; Yam, F. K.; Igba, V. M.; Beh, K. P. Tauc-plot scale and extrapolation effect on bandgap estimation from UV−vis−NIR data−a case study of β-Ga2O3. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 290, No. 121576. (92) Tauc, J.; Grigorovici, R.; Vancu, A. Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous germanium. physica status solidi (b). 1966, 15 (2), 627−37. (93) Sakthivel, S.; Hidalgo, M. C.; Bahnemann, D. W.; Geissen, S. U.; Murugesan, V.; Vogelpohl, A. A fine route to tune the photocatalytic activity of TiO2. Appl. Catal., B 2006, 63 (1−2), 31−40. (94) Makuła, P.; Pacia, M.; Macyk, W. How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV−Vis spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 6814−6817. (95) Stucchi, M.; Cerrato, G.; Bianchi, C. L. Ultrasound to improve both synthesis and pollutants degradation based on metal nano- particles supported on TiO2. Ultrason Sonochem. 2019, 51, 462−8. (96) Kubacka, A.; Muñoz-Batista, M. J.; Ferrer, M.; Fernández- García, M. UV and visible light optimization of anatase TiO2 antimicrobial properties: Surface deposition of metal and oxide (Cu, Zn, Ag) species. Appl. Catal., B 2013, 140, 680−90. (97) Hernández, J. V.; Coste, S.; Murillo, A. G.; Romo, F. C.; Kassiba, A. Effects of metal doping (Cu, Ag, Eu) on the electronic and optical behavior of nanostructured TiO2. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 710, 355−363. ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8808 https://doi.org/10.7508/jwent.2016.02.007 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01889?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01889?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00327?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00327?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103718 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103718 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14996-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14996-y https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.034 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.034 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1365-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1365-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1365-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.09.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.09.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.09.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.11.026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.11.026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.11.026 https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4270310 https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4270310 https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4270310 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00681 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00681 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00681 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00670?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00670?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00670?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00670?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-009-2258-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-009-2258-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-009-2258-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.07.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.07.007 https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2023-14585 https://doi.org/10.3390/IECB2023-14585 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6080432 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6080432 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.153 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.153 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.153 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03153-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03153-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01608 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01608 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.071 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.071 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.071 https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7050133 https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7050133 https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7050133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2008.12.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2008.12.008 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSST.0000039530.09380.bc https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSST.0000039530.09380.bc https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2103 https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2103 https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2103 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02032?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02032?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0058116 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0058116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.06.048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.06.048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121576 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121576 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121576 https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.19660150224 https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.19660150224 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.08.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.08.011 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.07.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.07.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.07.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.077 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.077 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.077 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.275 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.275 http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as (98) An, Y.; Yang, L.; Hou, J.; Liu, Z.; Peng, B. Synthesis and characterization of carbon nanotubes-treated Ag@ TiO2 core−shell nanocomposites with highly enhanced photocatalytic performance. Opt Mater. (Amst). 2014, 36 (8), 1390−5. (99) Khan, M. R.; Chuan, T. W.; Yousuf, A.; Chowdhury, M. N. K.; Cheng, C. K. Schottky barrier and surface plasmonic resonance phenomena towards the photocatalytic reaction: study of their mechanisms to enhance photocatalytic activity. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5 (5), 2522−31. (100) Elgrishi, N.; Rountree, K. J.; McCarthy, B. D.; Rountree, E. S.; Eisenhart, T. T.; Dempsey, J. L. A practical beginner’s guide to cyclic voltammetry. J. Chem. Educ. 2018, 95 (2), 197−206. (101) Pascariu, P.; Homocianu, M.; Vacareanu, L.; Asandulesa, M. Multi-Functional Materials Based on Cu-Doped TiO2 Ceramic Fibers with Enhanced Pseudocapacitive Performances and Their Dielectric Characteristics. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14 (21), 4739. (102) Kumar, M. R. A.; Abebe, B.; Nagaswarupa, H. P.; Murthy, H. C. A.; Ravikumar, C. R.; Sabir, F. K. Enhanced photocatalytic and electrochemical performance of TiO2-Fe2O3 nanocomposite: Its applications in dye decolorization and as supercapacitors. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10 (1), 1249. (103) Moriyama, A.; Yamada, I.; Takahashi, J.; Igarashi, H. Oxidative stress caused by TiO2 nanoparticles under UV irradiation is due to UV irradiation not through nanoparticles. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2018, 294, 144−150. (104) Wang, Y.; Zhitomirsky, I. Electrophoretic Deposition of Manganese Dioxide−Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Composites for Electrochemical Supercapacitors. Langmuir. 2009, 25 (17), 9684−9. (105) Yan, J.; Wei, T.; Shao, B.; Ma, F.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, M.; et al. Electrochemical properties of graphene nanosheet/carbon black composites as electrodes for supercapacitors. Carbon N Y. 2010, 48 (6), 1731−7. (106) Chaudhary, D.; Singh, S.; Vankar, V. D.; Khare, N. A ternary Ag/TiO2/CNT photoanode for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible light irradiation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017, 42 (12), 7826−35. (107) Luo, J.; Ma, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, J. Preparation of polypyrrole sensitized TiO2 nanotube arrays hybrids for efficient photo- electrochemical water splitting. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 167, 119−25. (108) Athas, C. J.; Jun, K.; McCafferty, C.; Owoseni, O.; John, T. V.; Raghavan, R. S. An Effective Dispersant for Oil Spills Based on Food- Grade Amphiphiles. Langmuir. 2014, 30 (31), 9285−94. ACS Omega http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf Article https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982 ACS Omega 2024, 9, 8797−8809 8809 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2014.03.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2014.03.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2014.03.038 https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY01545B https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY01545B https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY01545B https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00361?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00361?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214739 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214739 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214739 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58110-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58110-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58110-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2018.08.017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2018.08.017 https://doi.org/10.1021/la900937e?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/la900937e?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/la900937e?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.036 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.036 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.036 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.097 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.097 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.097 https://doi.org/10.1021/la502312n?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as https://doi.org/10.1021/la502312n?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf?ref=pdf https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05982?urlappend=%3Fref%3DPDF&jav=VoR&rel=cite-as