Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00601-z STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access © The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom- mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Implementation Science Communications Evaluating a multifaceted implementation strategy and package of evidence-based interventions based on WHO PEN for people living with HIV and cardiometabolic conditions in Lusaka, Zambia: protocol for the TASKPEN hybrid effectiveness-implementation stepped wedge cluster randomized trial Michael E. Herce1,2* , Samuel Bosomprah1,3, Felix Masiye4, Oliver Mweemba5, Jessie K. Edwards6, Chomba Mandyata1, Mmamulatelo Siame1,7, Chilambwe Mwila1, Tulani Matenga5, Christiana Frimpong1, Anchindika Mugala1,8, Peter Mbewe1, Perfect Shankalala1, Pendasambo Sichone1, Blessings Kasenge1, Luanaledi Chunga1, Rupert Adams1, Brian Banda1, Daniel Mwamba1, Namwinga Nachalwe1, Mansi Agarwal9, Makeda J. Williams10, Veronica Tonwe10, Jake M. Pry1,11, Maurice Musheke1, Michael Vinikoor1,12 and Wilbroad Mutale1,13 Abstract Background Despite increasing morbidity and mortality from non-communicable diseases (NCD) globally, health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have limited capacity to address these chronic conditions, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). There is an urgent need, therefore, to respond to NCDs in SSA, beginning by applying lessons learned from the first global response to any chronic disease—HIV—to tackle the leading cardiometabolic killers of people living with HIV (PLHIV). We have developed a feasible and acceptable package of evidence-based interventions and a multi-faceted implementation strategy, known as “TASKPEN,” that has been adapted to the Zambian setting to address hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. The TASKPEN multifaceted implementation strategy focuses on reorganizing service delivery for integrated HIV-NCD care and features task- shifting, practice facilitation, and leveraging HIV platforms for NCD care. We propose a hybrid type II effectiveness- implementation stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effects of TASKPEN on clinical and imple- mentation outcomes, including dual control of HIV and cardiometabolic NCDs, as well as quality of life, intervention reach, and cost-effectiveness. *Correspondence: Michael E. Herce michael.herce@cidrz.org Full list of author information is available at the end of the article http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1186/s43058-024-00601-z&domain=pdf http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-3867 Page 2 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Methods The trial will be conducted in 12 urban health facilities in Lusaka, Zambia over a 30-month period. Clinical outcomes will be assessed via surveys with PLHIV accessing routine HIV services, and a prospective cohort of PLHIV with cardiometabolic comorbidities nested within the larger trial. We will also collect data using mixed methods, including in-depth interviews, questionnaires, focus group discussions, and structured observations, and estimate cost-effectiveness through time-and-motion studies and other costing methods, to understand implementation out- comes according to Proctor’s Outcomes for Implementation Research, the Consolidated Framework for Implementa- tion Research, and selected dimensions of RE-AIM. Discussion Findings from this study will be used to make discrete, actionable, and context-specific recommenda- tions in Zambia and the region for integrating cardiometabolic NCD care into national HIV treatment programs. While the TASKPEN study focuses on cardiometabolic NCDs in PLHIV, the multifaceted implementation strategy studied will be relevant to other NCDs and to people without HIV. It is expected that the trial will generate new insights that ena- ble delivery of high-quality integrated HIV-NCD care, which may improve cardiovascular morbidity and viral suppres- sion for PLHIV in SSA. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05950919). Keywords Non-communicable diseases, HIV/AIDS, Hypertension, Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, Task shifting, Integration, Stepped-wedge trial, Hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial, Zambia Contributions to the literature 1. This paper presents an evidence-based package called “TASKPEN,” based on the WHO package of essential noncommunicable disease (PEN) interven- tions and a multifaceted implementation strategy centered on reorganizing clinical services and task- shifting, to facilitate integration of cardiometabolic non-communicable disease (NCD) care into U.S. Presi- dent’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-sup- ported HIV clinical settings in Zambia. 2. The paper introduces a practical definition for measuring control of both HIV and cardiometabolic NCDs called “dual control”. 3. The study will provide new knowledge on the: effects of the TASKPEN package on dual control; health system consequences of HIV/NCD integration; and ways to apply selected outcomes and domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), Proctor’s Outcomes for Implementa- tion Research, and RE-AIM to evaluate HIV/NCD ser- vice integration in resource-constrained routine prac- tice settings in sub-Saharan Africa. Introduction Globally, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) pose a significant public health and economic threat due to the disability, loss of productivity, and premature deaths associated with these conditions [1]. Among the NCDs, cardiometabolic NCDs, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), are the leading causes of mortality, contributing to 17.9 million of the estimated 41 million NCD-related deaths globally in 2023 [2]. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), CVDs are on a trajectory to overtake infectious diseases, such as HIV, as the leading causes of death by the year 2030. Zambia, like many SSA countries, is experiencing an increased burden of cardiometabolic NCDs because of improving economic conditions, more sedentary life- styles, and increasingly Western-style diets and substance use, including unhealthy alcohol and tobacco use [3–5]. This epidemiological transition disproportionately affects people living with HIV (PLHIV). With the increas- ing availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART), efforts to end the HIV epidemic in Africa have slowly begun to address HIV-related non-communicable co-morbidities. Hypertension afflicts 8.9 million PLHIV globally, and, while prevalence varies by region, it affects nearly 20% of all PLHIV in Eastern and Southern Africa [6, 7]. Simi- larly, cardiometabolic complications related to diabetes are increasing among PLHIV in Zambia and the region [8], with prevalence estimates exceeding 5% and 15% for diabetes mellitus and prediabetes, respectively [9]. Dia- betes mellitus among PLHIV is associated with 2.4 times the risk of CVD events compared to HIV-uninfected per- sons [10]. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens further complicate CVD risk, with newer antiretroviral drugs such as dolutegravir potentially associated with weight gain and blood pressure increase, and others, such as protease inhibitors, with dyslipidemia [8, 11]. Changes in body composition associated with some antiretrovi- ral agents, including excess visceral adipose tissue, have been linked to increased mortality [12, 13]. Evidence-based tools exist for the management of NCDs in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) pri- mary care settings. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a Package of Essen- tial Noncommunicable Disease Interventions for Pri- mary Health Care (WHO PEN) which is a collection of Page 3 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 evidence-based practices that includes: clinical decision support for managing cardiometabolic NCDs via easy-to- follow algorithms; a lifestyle counselling curriculum; and streamlined drug treatment protocols [14]. Its efficacy at improving blood pressure control is well proven in LMICs [15, 16]. Despite being established as an evidence- based intervention, implementation of WHO PEN and related tools is rare in SSA, and strategies to integrate it within HIV services has not been explored. Strategies that could be relevant include re-configur- ing service sites to enable colocation of integrated HIV and NCD services and task shifting NCD screening and management to non-physician health workers (NPHW). Several integration approaches have been piloted for NCD screening [17, 18] and HIV care and treatment [19, 20], however, most have focused on cancer and men- tal health [21]. Task shifting is common and effective in HIV care in SSA, but has not yet been widely extended to other chronic conditions [22, 23]. Because the profes- sional workforce in many SSA countries, including Zam- bia, remains limited, task shifting hypertension care to nurses or community health workers (CHWs) has the potential to synergize resources and knowledge to sup- port NCD care [22, 24]. Just as non-physicians now have strong capacity to provide HIV care using a public health approach, hypertension care can be provided by NPHWs who counsel patients on the benefits of a healthy lifestyle almost as often as physicians [22, 25]. The overarching objective of this study is to evaluate a package of evidence-based practices (EBPs) based on WHO PEN, together with an associated multi-faceted implementation strategy centered around task shift- ing and collocating health services in HIV care settings, which we have collectively referred to as TASKPEN (Tables  1 and 2). TASKPEN was developed through formative research that adapted the WHO PEN training curricula and algorithms to the Zambian HIV care set- ting for use by nurses and other NPHWs. We now plan to test the finalized TASKPEN package in a hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation stepped-wedge trial. In this paper, we describe the trial design, aims, outcomes, procedures, and novel analytical approaches to overcome threats to validity and generalizability. By rigorously evaluating the TASKPEN package, our study examines a potentially transformative approach to managing the intersecting challenges of HIV and NCDs in Zambia— one that may significantly advance healthcare for PLHIV with comorbid cardiometabolic conditions. Methods Study design We will conduct a hybrid type II effectiveness-implemen- tation stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, which is a pragmatic quasi-experimental design that will allow us to assess both implementation and clinical effectiveness outcomes, and thereby accelerate translation of our find- ings into policy and practice. With this design, we plan to achieve the following study aims: 1) estimate the effec- tiveness of the TASKPEN intervention on ‘dual control’ of HIV and cardiometabolic NCDs, as well as measures of cardiovascular risk and quality of life; and 2) evaluate TASKPEN implementation outcomes, including cost- effectiveness. Following a stepped-wedge approach, sequential crossover of sites (i.e., a health facility and surrounding catchment areas) will take place from standard of care (tan) to intervention (i.e., TASKPEN package shaded in orange) after a cross-sectional assess- ment of patient outcomes until all 12 sites (i.e., clusters) are exposed to the intervention (Fig. 1). As illustrated in the figure, outcome measurement will happen at times T0 [baseline], T1, T2 [midline], T3, and T4 [endline]. To overcome the limitations inherent to cross-sectional assessments of patient outcomes, and to facilitate gran- ular longitudinal data collection, we will also enroll a prospective cohort at 4 randomly selected study sites (i.e., dashed red arrows), “nested” in the larger trial. The cohort will comprise a representative sample of survey participants with co-morbid cardiometabolic NCDs and risk factors identified through the surveys to longitudi- nally follow throughout the study. To support introduction of the TASKPEN package in the U.S. President’s Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)- supported HIV program in Zambia, we have borrowed from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) [32, 33] and RE-AIM (Reach, Evalu- ation, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance) [34, 35]. Using a project-specific conceptual model and the Implementation Research Logic Model (Fig.  2), we delineate the complex relationships between barriers to introducing the TASKPEN package and the underly- ing mechanisms that lead to outcomes of interest. These frameworks organize our thinking about how the TASK- PEN package may act on different barriers to achieve implementation outcomes, which, in turn, have effects on important service and patient outcomes, including qual- ity of life and ‘dual control’ of HIV and cardiometabolic NCDs for PLHIV. Study setting and population Twelve high-volume sites (i.e., each site has ≥ 3,000 PLHIV in care per most recent PEPFAR data) were selected to participate in the trial from among all pub- lic health facilities in Lusaka, Zambia. The study sites reflect different levels of the Zambian health system. Prior to trial launch, we will review our formative site assessment data and equip all sites with basic NCD Page 4 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Ta bl e 1 O ve rv ie w o f e vi de nc e- ba se d pr ac tic es (E BP s) a nd m ul ti- fa ce te d im pl em en ta tio n st ra te gy th at fo rm th e TA SK PE N in te rv en tio n pa ck ag e, w ith s up po rt in g ev id en ce c ite d TA SK PE N E vi de nc e- ba se d Pr ac tic e (E BP ) Co m po ne nt s D es cr ip tio n of E BP C om po ne nt Im pl em en ta tio n Ba rr ie r M ul ti- fa ce te d Im pl em en ta tio n St ra te gy 1. O ne -s to p sh op fo r H IV a nd N CD s cr ee ni ng , di ag no si s, tr ea tm en t, an d ca re A “o ne s to p sh op ” e na bl es c o- m an ag em en t of H IV a nd N C D s in a n In te gr at ed A RT /N C D C lin ic . I nt eg ra te d N C D c ar e w ill ta ke a dv an ta ge of e xi st in g in no va tio ns in H IV c ar e, in cl ud - in g fo r m ed ic at io n di st rib ut io n, d iff er en tia te d se rv ic e de liv er y (D SD ), an d in te gr at ed a dh er - en ce s up po rt a nd b ac k- to -c ar e se rv ic es 1. S ilo ed c ar e: H IV a nd N C D s [2 6] 1. M ai n st ra te gy — Ch an ge / I nt eg ra te se rv ic e si te s: Re -c on fig ur e lo ca tio n fo r N C D s er vi ce de liv er y su ch th at TA SK PE N / in te gr at ed N C D c ar e is a va ila bl e in A RT a nd D SD H IV c lin ic s an d le ve r- ag es th e PE PF A R pl at fo rm .40 , 4 1 2. W H O P EN g ui de lin es a nd tr ai ni ng m at er i- al s A W H O -r ec om m en de d N C D te ch ni ca l p ac ka ge ha s be en h ar m on iz ed w ith n at io na l g ui de lin es ad ap te d fo r n on -p hy si ci an h ea lth w or ke r- le d m an ag em en t i n Za m bi a, w ith c le ar g ui de lin es on w he n to c on su lt or re fe r p at ie nt s to s pe - ci al is t p hy si ci an a nd h ig he r- le ve l f ac ili tie s. Tr ai ni ng m at er ia ls a re p ro to co liz ed a nd fe at ur e an e m ph as is o n pa tie nt -c en tr ed c ar e. N ur se s w ill b e tr ai ne d on th e W H O P EN p ro to co ls an d w ill b e en ab le d to p re sc rib e pr im ar y- le ve l m ed ic at io ns fo r h yp er te ns io n, d ia be te s, an d dy sl ip id em ia . T ra in in g se ss io ns w ill in cl ud e pr e- a nd p os t- te st tr ai ni ng o f u nd er st an di ng an d te am -b as ed in te ra ct iv e re vi ew o f t es t an sw er s. Co m m un ity h ea lth w or ke rs b as ed at th e fa ci lit y w ill c on du ct b lo od p re ss ur e sc re en in g, h ei gh t a nd w ei gh t m ea su re m en t, an d ra nd om b lo od g lu co se m on ito rin g. In ad di tio n, th ey w ill s up po rt h ea lth e du ca - tio n, in cl ud in g de liv er y of b rie f m ed ic at io n ad he re nc e an d sm ok in g ce ss at io n co un se lli ng , an d al so s up po rt c om m un ity tr ac in g an d ba ck to c ar e ac tiv iti es fo r P LH IV w ith c ar di om et ab ol ic co m pl ic at io ns w ho a re la te fo r a m ed ic at io n co lle ct io n or w ho d is en ga ge fr om c ar e 2. L ac k of a de qu at e te ch ni ca l s ki lls in N C D m an ag em en t [ 5, 2 7] 3. S ho rt ag e of h um an re so ur ce s fo r h ea lth , pa rt ic ul ar ly d oc to rs [2 7] a. P ra ct ic e fa ci lit at io n: P ro vi de tr ai ni ng , e du - ca tio na l m at er ia ls , a nd s up po rt to fa ci lit at e he al th ca re w or ke r s ki lls a cq ui si tio n on in te gr at ed N C D m an ag em en t b. R ev is e pr of es si on al ro le s: Ta sk s hi ft in te gr at ed N C D m an ag em en t t o no n- ph ys ic ia n he al th w or k- er s, bu ild in g on e xi st in g ta sk s hi ft in g pr ac tic es us ed in ro ut in e H IV c ar e 3. E le ct ro ni c M ed ic al R ec or d (E M R) Th e lo ca l E M R fo r P LH IV in Z am bi a, S m ar tC ar e, ha s be en a da pt ed to in cl ud e da ta c ol le ct io n fie ld s an d cl in ic al d ec is io n su pp or t p ro m pt s fo r N PH W s to m an ag e ca rd io m et ab ol ic N C D s. Li ke fo r H IV p ar am et er s, th e EM R al so c an tr ac k pr og re ss o n pe rf or m an ce a nd p ro ce ss in di ca - to rs , w hi ch w ill b e gi ve n to p ro vi de rs to fa ci li- ta te s ite -le ve l q ua lit y im pr ov em en t 4. L ac k of d at a fo r c lin ic al fo llo w -u p, d ec is io n su pp or t, an d pr og ra m m on ito rin g & ev al ua tio n [2 7, 2 8] c. C ha ng e re co rd s ys te m s: A dd N C D -fo cu se d m od ul e to n at io na l H IV E M R (k no w n as S m ar t- Ca re ) [ 29 ] w ith in te gr at ed d ec is io n su pp or t/ au to m at ic c lin ic al re m in de rs d. A ud it & Fe ed ba ck : R eg ul ar c ol la bo ra tiv e da ta re vi ew m ee tin gs a m on g fro nt lin e he al th w or ke rs fo cu se d on d as hb oa rd in di ca to rs to id en tif y an d ac t o n ar ea s fo r q ua lit y im pr ov em en t Page 5 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Ta bl e 1 (c on tin ue d) TA SK PE N E vi de nc e- ba se d Pr ac tic e (E BP ) Co m po ne nt s D es cr ip tio n of E BP C om po ne nt Im pl em en ta tio n Ba rr ie r M ul ti- fa ce te d Im pl em en ta tio n St ra te gy 4. C ar di om et ab ol ic c on di tio n di ag no st ic te st in g an d m on ito ri ng Po in t- of -c ar e (P O C ) d ia gn os tic s an d/ or s tr en gt he ne d la bo ra to ry s ys te m s to e na bl e sc re en in g an d di ag no st ic te st in g fo r c ar - di om et ab ol ic N C D s at h ea lth fa ci lit y le ve l. EB P al so in cl ud es d ec en tr al iz ed m on ito rin g of N C D s/ c ar di ov as cu la r r is k fa ct or s 5. L ac k of b as ic d ia gn os tic a nd v ita l s ig n eq ui p- m en t [ 30 ] d. C ha ng e ph ys ic al s tr uc tu re a nd e qu ip m en t: Pr o- vi de b as ic N C D s di ag no st ic , l ab or at or y, a nd v ita l si gn e qu ip m en t 5. S tr en gt he ne d N CD m ed ic at io n su pp ly ch ai n, in cl ud in g m ul ti- m on th d is pe ns in g (M M D ) TA SK PE N te am s w ill e ng ag e M O H le ad er sh ip to s up po rt im pr ov ed fo re ca st in g an d de liv er y of c ar di om et ab ol ic N C D m ed ic at io ns . T A SK PE N pr ac tic e fa ci lit at or s an d M O H c ha m pi on s ba se d at th e cl in ic s w ill s up po rt fa ci lit y- le ve l lo gi st ic a nd s up pl y ch ai n m an ag em en t, M M D of N C D m ed ic at io ns w ith in th e ex is tin g PE PF A R pr og ra m , a nd e m er ge nc y pr ov is io n of N C D m ed ic at io ns in c as e of s to ck o ut s 6. S to ck o ut s of re co m m en de d an ti- hy pe rt en - si ve , a nt i-d ia be tic , a nd a nt i-l ip id m ed ic at io ns e. U se w or k gr ou ps : E ng ag e M O H g ov er ni ng st ru ct ur es in e nh an ce d N C D m ed ic at io n su pp ly ch ai n m an ag em en t a t c en tr al le ve ls to b ui ld s up - po rt fo r N C D M M D in A RT c lin ic s f. Pr ac tic e fa ci lit at io n: P ro vi de tr ai ni ng , e du - ca tio na l m at er ia ls , a nd s up po rt to fa ci lit at e he al th ca re w or ke r s ki lls a cq ui si tio n on p ha rm ac y m an ag em en t a nd M M D im pl em en ta tio n Page 6 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Table 2 Description of components of the multi-faceted TASKPEN implementation strategy Implementation strategy Main or sub- component strategy Implementation actorsa Implementation actiona 1) Change/ Integrate service sites Main CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Practice Facilitators MOH HIV/NCD “Integration Champions” CIDRZ/TASKPEN Practice Facilitators will work with MOH HIV/NCD Integration Champions to reorganize patient flow at study sites to better integrate HIV and NCD care. This will be done by changing the service site for NCD care for PLHIV from outpatient departments to the ART and differentiated service delivery (DSD) clinics. CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Practice Facilita- tors will introduce features of integrated NCD care into existing HIV service delivery platforms, building on PEPFAR and national HIV investments a. Practice facilitation b. Revise professional roles Sub-component CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Practice Facilitators; MOH HIV/NCD Integration Champions CIDRZ/TASKPEN Practice Facilitators will train and coach MOH CHWs, peers, and nurses to assume NCD care responsibilities. CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Practice Facilitators and MOH HIV/ NCD Integration Champions will engage in interactive problem solving and sup- port basic quality improvement activities that enhances integrated care delivery c. Change record systems d. Audit & Feedback Sub-component CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Medical Informatics team; CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Practice Facilitators; MOH HIV/NCD Integration Champions CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Medical informatics team will introduce and manage a new mod- ule in the HIV EMR (SmartCare) to record cardiometabolic NCD data for PLHIV. The module will provide basic decision support to MOH NPHWs. It will also facilitate a simple automated dashboard for NCD performance indicator monitoring, which will be reviewed with NPHWs by CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Mentors and MOH HIV/NCD Integration Champions during data review meetings led by MOH staff. Dashboard indicators will focus on identify- ing processes for quality improvement (i.e., % of PLHIV with documented blood pressure measurement in reporting period, % of PLHIV with hypertension with anti-hypertensive medication collection in reporting period, etc.) e. Change physical structure and equipment Sub-component CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Practice Facilitators; CIDRZ/ TASKPEN laboratory technologist(s) will offer practice facilitation and support to strengthen NCD laboratory systems at facil- ity level. POC platforms may be introduced to increase screening for diabetes and dys- lipidemia in selected study sites if the facility does not have an existing chemistry platform or sufficient reagents or trained lab personnel to conduct these tests at the local lab. CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Practice Facilitators will add digital sphygmomanometers and glucometers to clinical screening areas in HIV service delivery spaces f. Use Working Groups g. Practice facilitation Sub-component MOH Leadership; CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Practice Facilitators; MOH HIV/NCD Integration Champions; MOH governing structures, such as ZAMRA and ZAMMSA, will be engaged through TASKPEN working groups to forecast and procure essen- tial NCD medications. CIDRZ/ TASKPEN working groups will provide advice on medication supply chain management to MOH manage- ment. At facility level, CIDRZ/ TASKPEN Practice Facilitators and MOH Integration Champions will notify clinicians about available NCD medi- cations and support multi-month dispensation of anti-hypertensive, anti-diabetic, and anti- lipid medications as stock levels allow a Implementation strategy specification per Proctor et al. [31] Page 7 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Fig. 1 Incomplete stepped-wedge design schematic for TASKPEN evaluation. Orange blocks reflect randomly selected cluster transition to the TASKPEN intervention Fig. 2 Implementation Research Logic Model adapted to the TASKPEN intervention [36] Page 8 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 equipment at the clinical departments where most PLHIV seek and receive care and treatment (i.e., ART and differentiated service delivery [DSD] clinics) to ensure a basic standard of care (SOC) at baseline. The target study population is all adult PLHIV access- ing HIV care and treatment services in Lusaka, Zambia. For patient surveys, all PLHIV ≥ 18 years enrolled in HIV care at the study sites during the study period will be eligible for inclusion. For the nested cohort, eligible participants will need to have completed a study survey and have ≥ 1 of the following cardiometabolic condi- tions or risk factors: 1) Any current tobacco use (within 30 days of the survey, whether daily or non-daily); 2) Hypertension as defined by WHO PEN/ HEARTS (i.e., systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥90 mmHg); [37] 3) Diabetes mellitus as defined by WHO PEN/ HEARTS (i.e., random plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7 mmol/L, and/ or hemoglobin A1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol or ≥6.5%; and/ or compatible clinical diagnosis); [37] 4) Prediabetes (defined as having impaired fasting glucose of 6.1–6.9 mmol/L and/or hemoglobin A1c 42–48 mmol/mol or between 6.0–6.4%); and/or 5) Dyslipidemia (defined as total cholesterol ≥5.2 mmol/L or low-density lipoprotein ≥3.4 mmol/L). Trial standard of care While screening, diagnosis, and treatment of car- diometabolic NCDs for PLHIV are recommended by national HIV guidelines, these services are generally unavailable or inconsistent in most ART and DSD clin- ics leading to low rates of NCD control [5, 38]. Equip- ment for blood pressure measurement is often available in ART and DSD clinics, but hypertension screening is not normalized nor universal in such clinics. Most public health facilities do not offer fasting or random blood glucose screening or hemoglobin A1c and lipid panel testing [5]. Fragmented NCD supply chain man- agement systems also mean that essential medications for hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia are often unavailable, and, when in stock, often can only be dis- pensed one to a few weeks at a time, thereby leading to frequent treatment interruption. Across facilities, health worker capacity to diagnose and manage cardi- ometabolic NCDs is limited and not protocolized like HIV services. Under the SOC, NPHWs such as clinical officers oversee clinical service delivery in virtually all ART and DSD clinics and prescribe ART and treatment for opportunistic infections. Trial intervention TASKPEN is a package of five EBP components that enables introduction of WHO PEN via a multi-faceted implementation strategy centred on task-shifting and service colocation for integration within routine PEP- FAR-supported HIV care settings in Zambia. TASKPEN is designed to build upon and strengthen the SOC. The EBP components and multi-faceted implementation strategy are described in detail in Tables 1 and 2. Study outcomes Table  3 describes primary and secondary clinical effec- tiveness outcomes for the trial. Our primary clinical out- come, ‘dual control,’ is defined as HIV viral suppression and control of all comorbid cardiometabolic NCDs and associated risk factors—namely, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking—according to established criteria [39, 40]. Table 4 describes study implementation outcomes. Randomization and masking The trial biostatistician will use a computer-generated allocation algorithm in Stata (StataCorp, College Sta- tion, TX, USA) to randomize clusters to a time point of implementation and conceal timing from the facilities as well as the trial team until a few weeks before the imple- mentation date. After implementation, the intervention will be unblinded to trial participants, care providers, and data collectors. We will use a similar computer-generated algorithm to randomly select 4 facilities (1 from each block) for the nested cohort. No summary reports on the primary outcome, dual HIV/NCD control, will be shared with any clinic or study staff in such a way that it could impact questions of equipoise. Sample size The sample size calculation (Table 5) was based on com- parisons of the primary clinical effectiveness outcome of dual control during the control and intervention periods. The control and intervention proportions are assumed to be 0.30 and 0.36, respectively, based on previous studies from Zambia [41, 42] suggesting high viral sup- pression (i.e., 95%) but poor (i.e., ~ 30%) control of car- diometabolic NCDs (0.32 * 0.95 = 0.30) [42, 43]. With these assumptions, and using the two-sided Wald Z-Test as the test statistic, an incomplete stepped-wedge cluster- randomized design with 5 time periods (T0-T4), 4 steps, 12 sites, and an average of 81 participants per cluster per time period achieves 80.417% power to detect a 6% absolute difference in the proportion of patients with dual control between control and intervention periods. This approach requires a calculated sample size of 4,860 Page 9 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Ta bl e 3 Pr im ar y an d se co nd ar y cl in ic al e ffe ct iv en es s ou tc om es o f i nt er es t Pr im ar y ou tc om e D efi ni tio n (& T im e Po in ts ) N ot es D ua l H IV a nd N C D C on tr ol # an d % o f p ar tic ip an ts w ith th e fo llo w in g at 1 2  m on th s: 1. H IV R N A < 1 ,0 00 c op ie s (c )/ m l o n m os t r ec en t m ea su re A N D 2. A bs en ce o f t he fo llo w in g: 1 ) u nc on tr ol le d sy st ol ic a nd d ia st ol ic h yp er te ns io n; 2) u nc on tr ol le d di ab et es m el lit us ; a nd 3 ) c ur re nt (p as t 3 0 da ys ) t ob ac co s m ok in g U nc on tr ol le d sy st ol ic h yp er te ns io n im pl ie s m ea su re ≥ 1 40 m m H g; u nc on tr ol le d di as to lic h yp er te ns io n im pl ie s m ea su re ≥ 9 0 m m H g; U nc on tr ol le d di ab et es m el lit us im pl ie s H gb A 1c ≥ 8 % (o r m os t r ec en t f as tin g bl oo d gl uc os e > 7 m m ol /L ) Se co nd ar y O ut co m es D efi ni tio n (& T im e Po in ts ) N ot es 10 -y ea r A SC VD R is k # an d % o f p ar tic ip an ts w ho : Ex pe rie nc e nu m er ic al im pr ov em en t i n 10 -y ea r A SC VD ri sk s co re a t 1 2 an d 24 m on th s Ex pe rie nc e im pr ov em en t i n ris k ca te go ry a t 1 2 an d 24 m on th s Ri sk s co re s an d ca te go rie s ac co rd in g to th e A m er ic an C ol le ge o f C ar di ol og y A SC VD P oo le d Co ho rt R is k Es tim at or (h tt ps :// to ol s. a cc . o rg / a sc vd - r is k- es tim at or - pl us /# !/ c al cu la te / e st im at e/ ): Bl oo d Pr es su re C on tr ol A ve ra ge n um er ic al c ha ng e in s ys to lic a nd d ia st ol ic b lo od p re ss ur e fro m b as el in e at 1 2 an d 24 m on th s A m on g su rv ey p ar tic ip an ts p re se nt in g fo r A RT / H IV c ar e se rv ic es a t s tu dy s ite s, as w el l a s w ith in in di vi du al s en ro lle d in th e ne st ed c oh or t Se ve re H yp er te ns io n # an d % o f p ar tic ip an ts w ith s ev er e hy pe rt en si on a t 0 , 1 2, a nd 2 4 m on th s D efi ne d as s ys to lic b lo od p re ss ur e ≥ 1 80 m m H g an d/ or d ia st ol ic b lo od p re s- su re ≥ 1 20 m m H g D ia be te s Co nt ro l A ve ra ge c ha ng e in h em og lo bi n A 1c a nd fa st in g gl uc os e fro m b as el in e at 1 2 an d 24 m on th s A m on g su rv ey p ar tic ip an ts p re se nt in g fo r A RT / H IV c ar e se rv ic es a t s tu dy si te s, as w el l a s w ith in in di vi du al s en ro lle d in th e ne st ed c oh or t; m ea n ch an ge in H gb A 1c a nd /o r f as tin g bl oo d gl uc os e fro m b as el in e at la st a ss es sm en t D ys lip id em ia C on tr ol A ve ra ge c ha ng e in L D L an d/ or to ta l c ho le st er ol fr om b as el in e at 1 2 an d 24 m on th s M ea n ch an ge in to ta l c ho le st er ol a nd L D L fro m b as el in e at la st a ss es sm en t Id ea l C ar di ov as cu la r H ea lth (C VH ) A ve ra ge c ha ng e in Id ea l C VH s co re o n a 0– 7 po in t L ik er t s ca le a t t im es 0 , 1 2, an d 24 m on th s C ha ng e in 7 -p oi nt s ca le d efi ne d ac co rd in g to th e A m er ic an H ea rt A ss oc ia tio n Li fe Si m pl e 7 Fa ct or s (h tt ps :// w w w . a ha jo ur na ls . o rg / d oi / 1 0. 11 61 / c irc u l at io na ha . 1 09 . 19 27 03 ) H IV -1 V ira l S up pr es si on # an d % o f p ar tic ip an ts w ith H IV -1 R N A v ira l s up pr es si on a t 0 , 1 2, a nd 2 4 m on th s A ss es se d at e m pi ric al ly s up po rt ed th re sh ol ds o f < 1 ,0 00 c /m l, < 2 00 c /m l, an d < 5 0 c/ m l Re te nt io n in H IV C ar e # an d % o f p ar tic ip an ts w ith e vi de nc e of b ei ng re ta in ed in H IV c ar e w ith in th e la st ~ 1 80 d ay s at 0 , 1 2, a nd 2 4 m on th s Pa rt ic ip an ts w ith ou t e vi de nc e of H IV tr ea tm en t i nt er ru pt io n, d ea th , o r l os s to fo l- lo w u p M ed ic at io n ad he re nc e Va ria tio n of m ed ic at io n po ss es si on ra tio (M PR ) Th e nu m be r o f d ay s la te fo r p ha rm ac y re fil ls b y to ta l d ay s on tr ea tm en t f or A RT an d N C D m ed ic at io ns a t 0 , 1 2, a nd 2 4 m on th s Q ua lit y of L ife # an d % o f p ar tic ip an ts w ith a n in cr ea se in q ua lit y- of -li fe s co re a t 1 2 an d 24 m on th s Q ua lit y of li fe s co re a ss es se d by W H O Q O L- H IV B RE F fo r Z am bi a: d oi :h tt ps :// do i. or g/ 10 . 1 01 6/ j. j an a. 20 10 . 0 4. 00 6 https://tools.acc.org/ascvd-risk-estimator-plus/#!/calculate/estimate/ https://tools.acc.org/ascvd-risk-estimator-plus/#!/calculate/estimate/ https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.109.192703 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.109.192703 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2010.04.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2010.04.006 Page 10 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Ta bl e 4 Im pl em en ta tio n ou tc om es o f i nt er es t Im pl em en ta tio n O ut co m e D efi ni tio n Th eo re tic al B as is M ea su re (s ) Re ac h N o. o f p eo pl e an d pe rc en ta ge o f t he ta rg et po pu la tio n aff ec te d an d th e ex te nt to w hi ch th e in di vi du al s re ac he d ar e re pr es en ta tiv e an d in cl ud e th os e m os t a t r is k RE -A IM • # a nd % o f P LH IV a t t he fa ci lit y (i. e. , w ith d oc um en te d re ce ip t o f A RT / H IV c ar e se rv ic es a t a st ud y sit e) sc re en ed fo r h yp er te ns io n at 0 , 1 2, a nd 2 4 m on th s f ro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n A do pt io n N o. a nd % o f s et tin gs p ar tic ip at in g, a nd th e ex te nt to w hi ch th e se tt in gs s el ec te d ar e re pr es en ta tiv e of s et tin gs th at th e ta rg et p op ul at io n w ill u se o r vi si t RE -A IM , C FI R • % o f f ac ili tie s a nd p ro vi de rs in iti at in g TA SK PE N in te rv en - tio n/ in te gr at ed c ar e at 0 , 1 2, a nd 2 4 m on th s • P er ce iv ed e na bl er s a nd b ar rie rs to T AS KP EN im pl em en ta - tio n an d pe rc ei ve d fit w ith o rg an iz at io na l p rio rit ie s a nd w or k flo w s a s a ss es se d th ro ug h in te rv ie w s a nd fo cu s gr ou ps a t ≥ 6 m on th s f ro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n Im pl em en ta tio n Le ve l o f a dh er en ce to im pl em en ta tio n pr in ci pl es or g ui de lin es , i nt er ve nt io n’ s pr ot oc ol , i nc lu di ng co st a nd c on si st en cy o f d el iv er y as in te nd ed RE -A IM , C FI R • % o f n ur se s a nd o th er n on -p hy sic ia n he al th w or ke rs a t ea ch si te th at su pp or te d in te rv en tio n/ in te gr at ed c ar e im pl em en ta tio n at le as t o nc e at 0 , 1 2 an d 24 m on th s • F id el ity to T AS KP EN g ui de lin es a nd tr ai ni ng m at er ia ls/ SO Ps a s a ss es se d by o bs er ve r a ss es sm en t d ur in g st ru ct ur ed ob se rv at io ns p re - a nd p os t-T AS KP EN in te rv en tio n at e ac h sit e at ≥ 6 m on th s f ro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n • S ite -le ve l a da pt at io ns to T AS KP EN d el iv er y an d its m an ag em en t a t d iff er en t c lin ic s a s a ss es se d by st ru ct ur ed ob se rv at io ns , F G D s, an d KI Is do ne ≥ 6 m on th s f ro m T AS K- PE N in tr od uc tio n • T ot al c os ts fo r T AS KP EN im pl em en ta tio n A cc ep ta bi lit y Ex te nt to w hi ch im pl em en ta tio n st ak eh ol de rs p er ce iv e a tr ea tm en t, se rv ic e, p ra ct ic e, o r i nn ov at io n to b e ag re ea bl e, p al at ab le , o r s at is fa ct or y RE -A IM , C FI R • A ve ra ge (m ea n) A cc ep ta bi lit y of In te rv en tio n M ea su re (A IM ) s co re a fte r T AS KP EN im pl em en ta tio n at ≥ 6 m on th s fro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n • P er ce pt io ns a t ≥ 6 m on th s f ro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n am on g in te rv ie w a nd F G D p ar tic ip an ts re ga rd in g th e ex te nt to w hi ch T AS KP EN is a gr ee ab le / d es ira bl e to th em Fi de lit y Pa rt ic ip an ts w ith e vi de nc e of N C D tr ea tm en t i nt er ru p- tio n/ m is si ng a p ha rm ac y re fil l f or a nt i-h yp er te ns iv e, an ti- di ab et ic , a nd /o r a nt i-l ip id a ge nt s Pr oc to r’s O ut co m es fo r I m pl em en ta tio n Re se ar ch • # a nd % o f p ar tic ip an ts w ith e vi de nc e of m iss in g a ph ar - m ac y re fil l f or a d oc um en te d ca rd io m et ab ol ic N CD a t 0 , 1 2, an d 24 m on th s Fe as ib ili ty Th e ex te nt to w hi ch a n ew tr ea tm en t, or a n in no va - tio n, c an b e su cc es sf ul ly u se d or c ar rie d ou t w ith in a gi ve n ag en cy o r s et tin g C FI R, P ro ct or ’s O ut co m es fo r I m pl em en ta tio n Re se ar ch • A ve ra ge (m ea n) F ea sib ili ty o f I nt er ve nt io n M ea su re (F IM ) sc or e af te r T AS KP EN im pl em en ta tio n at ≥ 6 m on th s f ro m TA SK PE N in tr od uc tio n • P er ce pt io ns a t ≥ 6 m on th s f ro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n am on g in te rv ie w a nd F G D p ar tic ip an ts re ga rd in g th e ex te nt to w hi ch T AS KP EN c an b e su cc es sf ul ly c ar rie d ou t i n th ei r p ar tic ul ar c lin ic al se tt in g Page 11 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Ta bl e 4 (c on tin ue d) Im pl em en ta tio n O ut co m e D efi ni tio n Th eo re tic al B as is M ea su re (s ) A pp ro pr ia te ne ss Pe rc ei ve d fit , r el ev an ce , o r c om pa tib ili ty o f t he in no va - tio n or e vi de nc e- ba se d pr ac tic e fo r a g iv en p ra ct ic e se tt in g, p ro vi de r, or c on su m er ; a nd /o r p er ce iv ed fit o f t he in no va tio n or e vi de nc e- ba se d pr ac tic e to a dd re ss a n is su e C FI R, P ro ct or ’s O ut co m es fo r I m pl em en ta tio n Re se ar ch • A ve ra ge (m ea n) In te rv en tio n Ap pr op ria te ne ss M ea su re (IA M ) s co re a fte r T AS KP EN im pl em en ta tio n at ≥ 6 m on th s fro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n • P er ce pt io ns a t ≥ 6 m on th s f ro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n am on g in te rv ie w a nd F G D p ar tic ip an ts re ga rd in g th e fit of T AS KP EN to a dd re ss c o- m or bi d ca rd io m et ab ol ic N CD s am on g PL H IV a cc es sin g he al th se rv ic es in ro ut in e H IV c ar e se tt in gs Su st ai na bi lit y Ex te nt to w hi ch a re ce nt ly im pl em en te d pr ac tic e is m ai nt ai ne d an d/ or in st itu tio na liz ed w ith in a s er vi ce se tt in g’ s on go in g, s ta bl e op er at io ns Pr oc to r’s O ut co m es fo r I m pl em en ta tio n Re se ar ch • A ve ra ge (m ea n) C lin ic al S us ta in ab ili ty A ss es sm en t T oo l (C SA T) sc or e af te r T AS KP EN im pl em en ta tio n at ≥ 6 m on th s fro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n • P er ce iv ed in te gr at io n or in st itu tio na liz at io n of th e TA SK PE N in te rv en tio n as a ro ut in e pr ac tic e, a nd p er ce iv ed al ig nm en t w ith M O H p ol ic y as a ss es se d th ro ug h in te rv ie w s an d fo cu s g ro up s a t ≥ 6 m on th s f ro m T AS KP EN in tr od uc tio n Co st -e ffe ct iv en es s Fi na nc ia l i m pa ct o f a n im pl em en ta tio n eff or t an d th e re la tiv e va lu e in q ua lit y ad ju st ed li fe y ea rs sa ve o f t he in te rv en tio n st at e ov er th e st an da rd o f c ar e st at e Pr oc to r’s O ut co m es fo r I m pl em en ta tio n Re se ar ch • I nc re m en ta l c os t- eff ec tiv en es s r at io s ( IC ER s) a t 0 , 1 2 an d 24 m on th s Page 12 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 participants. We will inflate the calculated sample size to allow for survey non-response and nested cohort recruit- ment. For non-response, we assume that ~ 5% of par- ticipants will have a missing lab parameter required for outcome ascertainment, and so we will enroll 85 individ- uals per cluster per time period, for a total of 5,100 par- ticipants. To recruit our nested cohort, we will need to enroll 200 participants at each of the 4 nested cohort sites during the baseline (or T1) surveys. With this rationale for sample size inflation, we anticipate a final total sample size of 5,560 survey participants. For the nested cohort, we will enroll a consecutive sample of baseline (and T1, if necessary) survey partici- pants found to have a cardiometabolic NCD or risk fac- tor through the survey. Assuming we enroll 2,500 survey participants at times T0 and T1 across all sites, that ~ 800 come from the 4 nested cohort sites, that approximately 38% of these (based on pilot data) meet nested cohort eli- gibility criteria, and that cohort loss to follow up will be about 5%, we will aim to enroll 80 nested cohort partici- pants per site or 320 total nested cohort participants. A paired design will be used to test whether there is a dif- ference in the proportion of nested cohort participants achieving dual control between the intervention and control periods. With 320 pairs, we will have > 80% power to detect a McNemar odds ratio of 1.47, or a difference between two paired proportions of 0.14 (i.e., 0.44 in those exposed to TASKPEN and 0.3 among the unexposed). The sample size calculations were computed using PASS 2022, version 22.0.3. Trial monitoring Annual trial monitoring will be conducted by an external Research Coordinating Center to ensure that study pro- cedures comply with good clinical practice and Zambian and international regulatory guidelines. All study staff will be responsible for the timely identification, report- ing, assessment, and management of adverse events (AEs) according to the study protocol and standard operating procedures. Any unexpected AEs and serious adverse events will be reported in a timely fashion to the overseeing IRBs and an independent Data Safety Moni- toring Board (DSMB). The DSMB is comprised of eight members with diverse research expertise and is respon- sible for trial oversight, monitoring study data, and pro- tecting participant safety. The DSMB will review interim safety analyses and has authority to terminate the trial early, if needed. Any modifications to the protocol will be communicated to the DSMB, as well as the sponsor, IRBs, and trial registry. Study procedures for completion of aim 1 Recruitment and informed consent For the patient surveys, we will recruit a simple random sample of PLHIV scheduled to access routine HIV ser- vices at the study sites during the times planned for each survey. We will work with clinic staff to review routinely available appointment records kept at each site, includ- ing routine clinic locator information containing patient phone numbers, to create a list of every patient with an upcoming appointment. We will then select every Nth patient with an upcoming appointment, who is not known to be dead or to have transferred out of the clinic (but including those potentially lost to follow up or expe- riencing treatment interruption), and contact them by phone using a standardized study recruitment script. If we do not meet our pre-specified daily site-level recruit- ment targets using the aforementioned approach, we will supplement with in-person recruitment. In person recruitment will proceed by asking every Nth patient present at the clinic during the surveys if they would be interested in learning more about the study during patient waiting times. After recruitment, interested per- sons will be offered a chance to participate after complet- ing informed consent procedures (Additional file 2) with a research assistant or other trained study staff member. For the nested cohort, we will contact a consecutive sample of all survey participants who we identify with an eligible cardiometabolic NCD or risk factor through the baseline survey (or T1 survey if recruitment is not Table 5 Statistical power at different sample size assumptions S = # of steps in the study design, S = T-1; T = # of time periods, including the baseline, T = S + 1; R = number of clusters switching from control to treatment at each step; K = Total number of clusters to be randomized, K = S*R; M = average number of participants per cluster, M = mx*T; m = average number of participants per cluster per time period, M/T; P1 = treatment proportion, assuming the alternative hypothesis; P2 = control proportion; D1 = Difference assuming the alternative hypothesis (H1); ICC = intracluster correlation coefficient Design Clusters Size Size Proportion Proportion Difference Power S/T/R K M/m N P1 P2 D1 ICC Alpha 0.80417 4/5/1 12 405/81 4860 0.36 0.3 0.06 0.2 0.05 0.80198 4/5/1 12 295/59 3540 0.37 0.3 0.07 0.2 0.05 0.80181 4/5/1 12 225/45 3270 0.38 0.3 0.08 0.2 0.05 Page 13 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 completed at T0) at four randomly selected sites and invite them to be followed longitudinally following writ- ten informed consent. To achieve greater balance of biological sex, if more than 60% of enrolled survey or nested cohort participants are of one sex, then we will attempt to preferentially sam- ple from the other sex until that percentage falls to or below 60%. Study instruments and data collection Data collection tools and instruments described in this protocol have been piloted and refined through the pre- ceding formative protocol (NCT05005130), and include a patient survey, lab result case reporting form (CRF), WHO QOL HIV Bref questionnaire [44], and patient economic expenses questionnaire. For our patient sur- veys, data will be collected at specified time points over a period of about 30 months (i.e., T0–T4). Study staff will administer a one-time patient survey to partici- pants using an electronic tablet to collect information on: socio-demographic factors; medical history; alcohol and tobacco use; ART and NCD medication regimens and adherence; dietary and exercise habits; purchase of medications in the private sector; and healthcare utilization. The patient survey is provided as an addi- tional file (see Additional file 1). As part of the survey, participants will also have anthropometric and cardio- vascular measures taken, have a random/fasting blood glucose checked, and undergo phlebotomy for choles- terol and hemoglobin A1c testing (if the random/fast- ing blood glucose is elevated). We will assess viral load through review of viral load test results available in the routine medical record. In Zambia, HIV viral load is offered through the national program at 6 and 12 months after ART start and then yearly thereafter. Dur- ing each survey, if we note that survey participants did not have a routine viral load test result within the pre- ceding ~ 3–6 months, we will provide “catch up” HIV-1 viral load testing through the study. Following comple- tion of the survey, participants who are not eligible for the nested cohort will be exited. Detailed data collection for the nested cohort will continue longitudinally every 6 months from enroll- ment until trial end. To ensure nested cohort retention, study peer educators will trace by phone or in person any participants who miss a study visit or deviated from the nested cohort procedures summarized in Table 6. Data management Study-specific survey and cohort data will be merged with electronic routine data to create a comprehensive, and secure database in REDCap (Nashville, Tennes- see, USA). Data in the trial database will be organized by participant identification number assigned to each participant that will then serve as the lone study iden- tifier to protect participant confidentiality. The study database will be encrypted and password protected and backed up daily on a secure, encrypted server restricted to authorised study staff only. The study data man- ager will conduct regular database QA/QC queries for extreme, missing, and illogical values. Table 6 Nested Cohort Visit Schedule and Procedures AIM Acceptability of intervention measure, FIM Feasibility of intervention measure, IAM Intervention appropriateness measure, RBG Random blood glucose, FBG Fasting blood glucose, VL Viral load a Procedure may be done at the 18-month visit in lieu of the 24-month visit for nested cohort participants enrolled after the T1 survey Nested Cohort Procedures Visit Month 0 6 12 18 24 Cohort enrollment visit • Cohort follow-up visit • • • • Patient survey administration • • • • • Medical record review and abstraction • • • • • Anthropometric and cardiovascular measures taken • • • • • WHOQOL-HIV-Bref-Zambia quality of life questionnairea • • • Patient economic questionnaire (part of costing study)a • • • Patient implementation questionnaire (including AIM, FIM, IAM)a • • • Random/ fasting blood glucose (RBG/ FBG) • • • • • Screening Hemoglobin A1c (if RBG/ FBG elevated) • • • • • Monitoring Haemogloblin A1c (for diabetics and pre-diabetics) • • • • • Lipid Profilea • • • HIV-1 VL (if not documented in medical record within past ~ 3–6 months)a • • • • • Page 14 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Learn as you GO (LAGO) methodology To allow for adaptation and refinement of the TASK- PEN package as the trial progresses, we will use the novel ‘Learn As you GO’ or ‘LAGO’ methodology [45]. Using LAGO, at the trial mid-point (i.e., after the T2 midline survey around 12 months into trial implementation), the data collected up to that point will be used to optimize the presence and dose of pre-specified components of the TASKPEN package. Then, at the start of introduc- tion of TASKPEN to clusters 7 and 8, a modification to the TASKPEN intervention will be suggested to increase TASKPEN uptake. Statistical methods for aim 1 The primary analysis will be performed on the intention- to-treat (ITT) population, applying sampling weights based on our sampling approach. Continuous and cat- egorial variables will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Mixed-effect logistic regression modeling will be used to estimate the effect of the intervention on dual control of HIV and cardiometabolic NCDs, adjust- ing for potential confounders and covariates imbalanced between the intervention and SOC populations. We plan to adjust for age, gender, time on ART, ART regimen, status in the HIV program, having new (i.e., identified through the study) versus an established (i.e., previously known) cardiometabolic NCD, and duration or “dose” of exposure to TASKPEN, among other variables identified by our directed acyclic graph. In planned sensitivity anal- yses, we will exclude participants who were not meaning- fully exposed to the control or intervention and examine effects according to various durations of intervention exposure. We will also examine results after including uncontrolled dyslipidemia in our composite definition of dual HIV-NCD disease control. Continuous outcomes for systolic blood pressure, dias- tolic blood pressure, 10-year ASCVD risk score, hemo- globin A1c, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol, and quality of life scores will be analyzed in an analogous way using mixed-effects linear regression mod- els. We will adjust for changes in age observed over the study period that might affect ASCVD risk scores in the model. The proportion with disease control in the interven- tion versus control periods for individual conditions like hypertension and diabetes will be compared using mixed- effects logistic regression model, adjusted for potential confounders. All analyses will be performed using Stata 18 MP8 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) or R 4.2.2. For the nested cohort, we will use random-effects binomial regression modelling to assess the relationship between the TASKPEN package and binary and con- tinuous outcomes of interest. The intervention status of a cohort participant will correspond to the intervention status of the cluster of the participant. Using a panel data analytic technique, we will adjust for the temporality in outcome measurement. For continuous outcomes, we will use a random-effects linear regression model. Multiple imputation will be used to handle missing data. In cases where we want to account for one vari- able at a time, we will apply sampling weights based on recruitment of survey participants into the nested cohort. Measurements from the nested cohort will be used to augment measurements in the survey by upweighting participants in the cohort to represent all eligible partici- pants who were missing a value in the survey. We will use a similar approach to make inferences about the distri- butions of cardiometabolic outcomes for the total clinic population at our study sites. To compare patient-level HIV outcomes, we will report differences and ratios with accompanying 95% confidence intervals for retention, adherence, and viral suppression according to definitions in Table 3. Study procedures for completion of aim 2 To assess implementation outcomes and explore explana- tory mechanisms for why the TASKPEN package suc- ceeds or fails in the trial, we will collect the following data embedded in the larger pragmatic trial: question- naires with patients and providers, including NPHWs; in-depth interviews (IDIs) with patients; focus group discussions (FGDs) with NPHWs and CHWs supporting TASKPEN delivery; and key informant interviews (KII) with stakeholders. Study population For aim 2, the study population will encompass patients exposed to the TASKPEN package as trial survey or cohort participants, as well as stakeholders and imple- mentation actors involved in TASKPEN delivery. Data collection Data collection activities for aim 2 will involve a com- bination of non-human subjects research (NHSR) and implementation science research activities (Table 7). Two NHSR activities will take place, the first being structured observations and the second being a costing study for the cost-effectiveness analysis. Mixed methods study instruments A summary of all data collection tools for completion of aim 2 are presented in Table 8. Structured observations acknowledge the importance that health system actors play in delivering integrated HIV/NCD care. During observations, trained observ- ers will observe patient flow and other elements of day- to-day clinic operations. Structured observations will Page 15 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 be conducted twice at each site—once before and once after introduction of TASKPEN. Data collected on the guides will be formalized into research memos and will contribute to building a picture of integrated HIV/NCD service delivery informed by CFIR model domains and constructs [33]. Qualitative guides for FDG, IDI, and KII were devel- oped and refined during the study pilot. All guides were Table 7 Summary of data collection activities using mixed methods for Specific Objective #2 Method Activity Type Participant inclusion criteria Total Participants Approximate time for each activity Structured Observations Non-human subjects research 0 (Non-participatory) 1–2 h Costing survey Non-human subjects research HIV-positive adults ≥ 18 years of age who had received HIV and/or NCD services at a TASK- PEN study site, OR ≥ 18 years of age and a facility-level health- care provider or manager at facil- ity, district, provincial, or national level in Zambia, and generally familiar with HIV and/or NCD- related issues 0 (Non-participatory) 1.5 h Focus group discussions Research ≥ 18 years of age; a NPHW or community health worker (CHW)/ lay health provider involved with TASKPEN or inte- grated HIV/NCD service delivery; and generally familiar with HIV and/or NCD service delivery at their facility 72 – 96 NPHW (1 FDG at each site and 6–8 per FGD) 1.5 h Research 72 – 96 CHW/lay health provid- ers (1 FDG at each site and 6–8 per FGD) 1.5 h Research 144 – 192 (all FDG participants) 15 min In-depth interviews Research HIV-positive adults ≥ 18 years of age who were survey and/ or cohort participants at a TASK- PEN study site ~ 40 (3–4 per site) ~ 1 h Key informant interviews Research ≥ 18 years of age; a facility-level ART, differentiated service deliv- ery (DSD), outpatient depart- ment (OPD), or relevant clinical leader/ manager/ in-charge, or policy maker at district, provincial, or national level in Zambia; and generally familiar with HIV and/or NCD-related issues in their community ~ 12 (1 per site) ~ 1 h Total Mixed Methods Participants ~ 196 – 244 Table 8 Summary of data collection tools employing mixed methods for completion of aim #2 Data collection tool title Structured Observation IDI FGD KII Costing Structured Observation Guide • Post FGD/ KII Implementation Questionnaire • • Non-Physician Health Worker Focus Group Discussion (FGD) Guide • Community Health Worker Focus Group Discussion (FGD) Guide • Participant In-depth Interview Guide • Key Informant Interview Guide TASKPEN • Facility Costing Survey • Patient Clinic Flow Time & Motion Tool • Health Worker Time & Motion Direct Observation Tool • Health Worker Time & Motion Self-Report Tool • Page 16 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 informed by the CFIR and feedback from stakeholders using human-centred design approaches, and have been developed in English and translated into Bemba and Nyanja, the two most commonly spoken languages in Lusaka. An implementation questionnaire will be admin- istered to participants at the end of each KII and FGD. The implementation questionnaire features the FIM, AIM, and IAM, [46] as well as the Program Sustainabil- ity Assessment Tool (https:// www. susta intool. org/ csat/), among other tools [47]. Costing data collection Costing data collection will have three components: 1) a patient economic questionnaire in the nested cohort; 2) an administrative costing data review; 3) a facility cost- ing survey. For the administrative costing component, we will review clinic administrative records at the 12 study sites to evaluate patient clinical service use and associ- ated costs. For the facility costing survey component, we will con- duct a costing survey at all 12 study sites before and after TASKPEN introduction involving ~ 30 Ministry of Health (MOH) informants and observations of patients and pro- viders. The facility costing survey will observe: (a) The NCD service components accessible at ART and DSD clinics; (b) The proportion of human resources trained to deliver TASKPEN; (c) Distribution of overheads across various centers, and attribution to the TASKPEN package; (d) Salaries of all staff cadres involved in the TASKPEN package/ integrated HIV/NCD services; (e) Time spent by patients waiting, preparing for, or receiving integrated HIV/NCD services (patient time and motion) (f ) Time spent by providers waiting, preparing for, or delivering TASKPEN (provider time and motion) (g) The quantity of material inputs and costs utilized in implementation of the TASKPEN intervention; The patient time and motion survey will involve observing ~ 20–25 patients per facility at each time point before and after the intervention (i.e., ~ 360–400 total) for waiting times, frequency of visits, and use of facility level services as they move throughout the facility. For pro- viders, the time and motion survey will involve observ- ing and documenting the start and end times of service delivery-related activities for ~ 5–7 providers per facility at each time point (i.e., ~ 120–160 total). We will observe various staff cadres at each facility. All these data sources will be combined in the final facility costing survey for each facility. Outcomes We will evaluate implementation outcomes of reach, as well as adoption and implementation patterned after the RE-AIM framework [34, 35] (Table  4). Quantitative metrics adapted from RE-AIM will be enriched with qualitative assessments according to CFIR and Proctor’s Conceptual Model of Implementation Research [48]. Statistical methods overview We will use simple descriptive statistics to describe reach, adoption, implementation, and fidelity accord- ing to the definitions provided in Table 4, and calculate means and measures of dispersion for quantitative meas- ures of acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and sustainability. Costing analysis The costing analysis will include costs for the following items: (i) staff time, (ii) personnel costs, (iii) medical and nonmedical consumables, (iv) type and number of labo- ratory tests, (v) capital allowances and overheads, and (vi) administrative costs. We will present aggregated total costs and unit costs for integrated and SOC service deliv- ery. Estimation of patient economic costs will be meas- ured by: (i) direct patient out-of-pocket expenses from the patient economic questionnaire; and (ii) indirect costs defined as value of lost production time. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, we will develop a simplified Markov state-transition model that repre- sents care pathways for the TASKPEN package and SOC. Cost-effectiveness for the TASKPEN package relative to the SOC will be evaluated based on willingness-to-pay thresholds. The primary cost-effectiveness outcome will be assessed based on cost per patient with dual control. Secondarily, we will model the conversion of cardiometa- bolic disease control and viral suppression into disability adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, reflecting Zambia’s age and disease adjusted life-expectancy, and disability weights [49]. Health systems costs will also be tracked for participants from the point of study enrollment, and will be tallied based on expected health services utilization for each care pathway. Qualitative data analysis The qualitative data analysis is intended to elucidate the mechanisms, barriers and facilitators, and contextual factors that influenced our clinical and implementation outcomes. Content analysis guided by CFIR, RE-AIM, and our conceptual model (Fig. 3) will be used to code, analyze, and interpret our data [46]. Selected domains and constructs of the CFIR have been featured in our qualitative guides [33, 46], including: complexity, patient https://www.sustaintool.org/csat/ Page 17 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 needs and resources, perceived healthcare worker chal- lenges, structural characteristics, knowledge and beliefs, planning, and executing. Once all codes have been final- ized and themes developed, we will compare them across different participant types and qualitative data collection methods using matrices [46]. We will apply principles of triangulation, negative case analysis, and respondent vali- dation to minimize bias in the qualitative analysis. Results dissemination TASKPEN results will be disseminated locally to par- ticipants and partner communities and organizations in Zambia. Results will also be shared with the scientific community through conferences, journal publications, and reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov. Discussion While mounting data describe an aging global cohort of PLHIV with a growing burden of cardiometabolic NCDs and the evidence-based tools available to combat these NCDs, relatively little is known about how to deploy these tools in real-world clinical practice settings in SSA. Moreover, few studies have described the diverse local contexts, available HIV service delivery platforms, and models of service integration that can support the global HIV response as it moves toward universal primary care for PLHIV. The TASKPEN study is designed to address these urgent knowledge gaps by contributing new evi- dence on how best to integrate NCD and HIV services in African settings with high HIV/NCD burden and limited resources, and on how NPHWs can contribute to service delivery in these settings. TASKPEN also advances a new concept of ‘dual control’ for HIV and NCDs, which may help HIV programs think beyond viral suppression to more holistic and person-centred metrics for the health and wellbeing of PLHIV. The TASKPEN package is designed to be feasible for urban, PEPFAR-supported HIV care settings in Zam- bia. The EBP components were selected to be practical and intentionally leverage existing PEPFAR and MOH health system investments, including for the national EMR, health worker capacity building, pharmacy and laboratory systems, and patient-centred care innovations like multi-month medication dispensing. The greatest challenge for TASKPEN feasibility may be the need to restructure clinical workflows to create one-stop shops Fig. 3 Conceptual model of change for TASKPEN intervention, showing how intervention components ultimately can lead to dual disease control and reduced CVD risk Page 18 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 where HIV and NCD services for PLHIV can be provided together using the same space, providers, and health record, which is addressed directly by our multifaceted implementation strategy. Our strategy, with service site reorganization and integration at its core, and peripheral components of task-shifting, practice facilitation, and upgrading equipment, physical structures, and medical information systems is being evaluated in hopes that it can overcome the known barriers that have stymied inte- grated NCD care in the past. Emerging evidence from high-income and lower-mid- dle income settings support integrating prevention, man- agement, and surveillance of NCDs into other models of chronic care [20, 50]. Integrated care requires a multidis- ciplinary approach that engages various health workers, and critical to this approach in resource-constrained set- tings is task-shifting. The task-shifting strategy is prem- ised on the fact that most health facilities in LMICs have inadequate numbers of trained health workers—and especially doctors—to meet the needs of the population. Therefore, engaging CHWs, nurses, and other NPHWs to lead cardiometabolic NCD care is a cornerstone of our multifaceted implementation strategy and has been shown to improve blood pressure control in general, non- HIV populations in India, Ghana, and Nigeria [51–54]. Although the TASKPEN package has underpinnings in prior clinical research and formative work from Zam- bia, demonstrating its impact will require robust clinical and implementation outcome measurement. To accom- plish this, we have selected a pragmatic trial design and powered it around a primary outcome of ‘dual control’ focused on properly treating both HIV and cardiometa- bolic NCDs. We have deliberately done this to capture the hypothesized effects of the TASKPEN package on multiple aspects of health of PLHIV, and to advance the public health narrative about what should matter and be measured by HIV treatment programs. Thanks to now widely available and efficacious ART regimens, viral sup- pression alone, while an important biomarker, need not be the ultimate criterion for clinical or programmatic success. Rather, a measure like dual control that more closely approximates more distal and meaningful clinical outcomes like mortality, and attempts to estimate effects on common comorbidities may better focus researchers’, clinicians’, and implementers’ attention on the interven- tions most likely to prolong life and address multi-mor- bidity for PLHIV. Indeed, in an era where the third 95 is in sight, preventing premature death from any cause, including cardiometabolic NCDs, and supporting PLHIV to access chronic care that improves quantity and quality of life should be the ultimate goal. To rigorously measure dual control and other study outcomes, we have incorporated several analytical innovations to overcome methodological limitations inherent to stepped-wedge trials. First, we have added a prospective cohort at four randomly selected study sites to overcome limitations of serial cross-sectional out- come ascertainment for outcomes like cardiovascular disease risk. Second, we intend to estimate the effects of the TASKPEN package on dual control among the total clinic population—not just among study participants— to improve study generalizability and better under- stand how TASKPEN may influence performance in the national HIV program. Therefore, we will weight data from the patient surveys and nested cohort, which are both sub-populations sampled from each site, to enrich routine medical data available at the sites and overcome any missingness in routinely collected data. Third, we will employ the LAGO method at the study midline to refine the dose and intensity of selected components of our multi-faceted implementation strategy. Finally, we will conduct cost-effectiveness analyses, as well as mixed methods evaluations applying established implementa- tion science theory, to understand patient- and health system-level mechanisms and mediators of HIV/NCD integration during the trial. Implications Findings from this study can inform discrete, actionable, and context-specific recommendations to integrate cardi- ometabolic NCD care into Zambia’s national HIV treat- ment program. While the TASKPEN study focuses on cardiometabolic NCDs, the multifaceted implementation strategy studied will be relevant to other NCDs in PLHIV. Finally, it is expected that the trial will generate new insights that enable delivery of more person-centred and integrated HIV/NCD care, which may promote improved long-term outcomes for PLHIV in Zambia and elsewhere in the region. Abbreviations ART Antiretroviral therapy CHW Community health worker CVD Cardiovascular disease EBP Evidence-based practice LMIC Low- and middle-income country NCD Non-communicable disease NPHW Non-physician health workers PLHIV People living with HIV SSA Sub-Saharan Africa WHO World Health Organization WHO PEN WHO Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions for Primary Care Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s43058- 024- 00601-z. Additional file 1. Includes the main data collection survey tool for the trial. Additional file 2. includes the informed consent form for the main trial survey. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00601-z https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00601-z Page 19 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 Acknowledgements We thank the study stakeholders who contributed to the TASKPEN pack- age, including the Zambia Ministry of Health, CDC/ Zambia, faculty from the University Teaching Hospital who participated in the TASKPEN clinical guidelines committee, and leadership from the Zambia Medicines & Medical Supplies Agency. We acknowledge the contributions and leadership of the Lusaka Provincial Health Office, Lusaka District Health Office, and medical superintendents and clinic in-charges at our study sites. We would like to acknowledge implementing partners who have contributed to stakeholder engagement and support of site-level piloting of the TASKPEN package, including CIDRZ, IHM, and the PEN Plus program. We also recognize our study Technical Advisory Committee members who support the study through their ongoing technical consultations, guidance, and support. Finally, we thank the National Heart, Lung, andBlood Institute and the Fogarty International Center of the trial sponsor, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (https:// www. nih. gov/ about- nih/ conta ct- us), for their support of this work. Authors’ contributions MEH conceptualized the manuscript, supported funding acquisition, helped develop the study methodology, and led the writing of the original draft. SB, FM, OM, JKE, MM, and MV helped develop the study methodology. CM, CF, and NN led project administration. CM, MS, TM, AM, PM, PS, PS, BK, LC, RA, BB, and DM provided project supervision. MA, MW, VT, and JMP reviewed and edited the manuscript. WB conceptualized the manuscript with MEH, led funding acquisition, helped develop the study methodology, and reviewed and edited the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Funding Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UH3HL156389. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institutes of Health, or the U.S. Depart- ment of Health and Human Services. The funder provided technical input on the study design and the contents of this manuscript, but had no role in the conceptualization of the study, design of data collection tools or proposed analyses, or the decision to publish. Availability of data and materials De-identified datasets along with the accompanying statistical code will be made available upon request to the National Health Research Authority and study multiple principal investigators after the publication of the main findings. We will require interested parties to submit a data request in writing. Once approved, data transfer agreements will be developed. All data transfers comply with HIPAA regulations. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate The trial protocol, version 1.1, dated 14 February 2023, was approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board (#370266), the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (#3165–2022), and the National Health Research Authority of Zambia (#NHREB0001/14/03/2023). All study volunteers must provide written informed consent to participate in the trial. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Author details 1 Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia. 2 Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 3 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. 4 Department of Health Econom- ics, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia. 5 Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia. 6 Depart- ment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 7 Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. 8 Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia. 9 Institute of Public Health, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. 10 Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 11 Department of Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA. 12 Division of Infectious Diseases, Depart- ment of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA. 13 Depart- ment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. Received: 31 March 2024 Accepted: 28 May 2024 References 1. WHO. Preventing chronic disease: A vital investment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. 2. WHO. Non-communicable diseases Fact Sheet: World Health Organiza- tion (WHO); 2023. Available from: https:// www. who. int/ news- room/ fact- sheets/ detail/ nonco mmuni cable- disea ses. 3. Levitt NS, Steyn K, Dave J, Bradshaw D. Chronic noncommunicable diseases and HIV-AIDS on a collision course: relevance for health care delivery, particularly in low-resource settings–insights from South Africa. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(6):1690S-S1696. 4. Mukanu MM, Zulu JM, Mweemba C, Mutale W. Responding to non- communicable diseases in Zambia: a policy analysis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):34. 5. Mutale W, Bosomprah S, Shankalala P, Mweemba O, Chilengi R, Kapam- bwe S, et al. Assessing capacity and readiness to manage NCDs in primary care setting: Gaps and opportunities based on adapted WHO PEN tool in Zambia. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8): e0200994. 6. Bigna JJ, Ndoadoumgue AL, Nansseu JR, Tochie JN, Nyaga UF, Nkeck JR, et al. Global burden of hypertension among people living with HIV in the era of increased life expectancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2020;38(9):1659–68. 7. Bigna JJ, Noubiap JJ. Global burden of hypertension in people living with HIV. BMC Med. 2021;19(1):112. 8. Mulenga LB, Musonda P, Chirwa L, Siwingwa M, Mweemba A, Suwilanji S, et al. Insulin Resistance is Associated with Higher Plasma Viral Load Among HIV-Positive Adults Receiving Longer-Term (1 Year) Combination Antiretroviral Therapy (ART). J Infect Dis Ther. 2019;7(4). 9. Peer N, Nguyen KA, Hill J, Sumner AE, Cikomola JC, Nachega JB, et al. Prevalence and influences of diabetes and prediabetes among adults living with HIV in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int AIDS Soc. 2023;26(3): e26059. 10. Murata H, Hruz PW, Mueckler M. The mechanism of insulin resistance caused by HIV protease inhibitor therapy. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(27):20251–4. 11. Pry JM, Bolton-Moore C, Sharma A, Wandeler G, Vera J. Prevalence and predictors of hypertension in aging people living with HIV attending care in Zambia. 11th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Science; Berlin, Germany. 2021. 12. Teede H, Deeks A, Moran L. Polycystic ovary syndrome: a complex condi- tion with psychological, reproductive and metabolic manifestations that impacts on health across the lifespan. BMC Med. 2010;8:41. 13. Thompson-Paul AM, Wei SC, Mattson CL, Robertson M, Hernandez- Romieu AC, Bell TK, et al. Obesity among HIV-infected adults receiving medical care in the United States: data from the cross-sectional medical monitoring project and national health and nutrition examination survey. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(27):e1081-e. 14. WHO. CVD Risk Management Package for low-and medium-Resource Settings. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. WHO; 2002. 15. Labhardt ND, Balo J-R, Ndam M, Grimm J-J, Manga E. Task shifting to non-physician clinicians for integrated management of hypertension and diabetes in rural Cameroon: a programme assessment at two years. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:339. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/contact-us https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/contact-us https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases Page 20 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 16. Mendis S, Johnston SC, Fan W, Oladapo O, Cameron A, Faramawi MF. Cardiovascular risk management and its impact on hypertension control in primary care in low-resource settings: a cluster-randomized trial. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(6):412–9. 17. Chamie G, Kwarisiima D, Clark TD, Kabami J, Jain V, Geng E, et al. Leverag- ing Rapid Community-Based HIV Testing Campaigns for Non-Communi- cable Diseases in Rural Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):e43400. 18. Kavishe B, Biraro S, Baisley K, Vanobberghen F, Kapiga S, Munderi P, et al. High prevalence of hypertension and of risk factors for non-communica- ble diseases (NCDs): a population based cross-sectional survey of NCDS and HIV infection in Northwestern Tanzania and Southern Uganda. BMC medicine. 2015;13:126. 19. Khabala KB, Edwards JK, Baruani B, Sirengo M, Musembi P, Kosgei RJ, et al. Medication Adherence Clubs: a potential solution to managing large numbers of stable patients with multiple chronic diseases in informal settlements. Trop Med Int Health. 2015;20(10):1265–70. 20. Wroe EB, Kalanga N, Mailosi B, Mwalwanda S, Kachimanga C, Nyangulu K, et al. Leveraging HIV platforms to work toward comprehensive primary care in rural Malawi: the Integrated Chronic Care Clinic. Healthcare. 2015;3(4):270–6. 21. MatanjeMwagomba BL, Ameh S, Bongomin P, Juma PA, MacKenzie RK, Kyobutungi C, et al. Opportunities and challenges for evidence- informed HIV-noncommunicable disease integrated care policies and programs: lessons from Malawi, South Africa Swaziland and Kenya. AIDS. 2018;32:S21–32. 22. Lekoubou A, Awah P, Fezeu L, Sobngwi E, Kengne AP. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus and task shifting in their management in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(2):353–63. 23. World Medical Association Resolution on task shifting from the medical profession. World Medical Association; 2019. Available from: https:// www. wma. net/ polic ies- post/ wma- resol ution- on- task- shift ing- from- the- medic al- profe ssion/. Accessed 29 Nov 2020. 24. Zachariah R, Ford N, Philips M, S.Lynch, Massaquoi M, Janssens V, et al. Task shifting in HIV/AIDS: opportunities, challenges and pro- posed actions for sub-Saharan Africa. Trans Royal Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103(6):549–58. 25. Ogedegbe G, Tobin JN, Fernandez S, Gerin W, Diaz-Gloster M, Cassells A, et al. Counseling African Americans to Control Hypertension (CAATCH) trial: a multi-level intervention to improve blood pressure control in hypertensive blacks. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(3):249–56. 26. Njuguna B, Vorkoper S, Patel P, Reid MJA, Vedanthan R, Pfaff C, et al. Models of integration of HIV and noncommunicable disease care in sub- Saharan Africa: lessons learned and evidence gaps. Aids. 2018;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-s42. 27. Rogers HE, Akiteng AR, Mutungi G, Ettinger AS, Schwartz JI. Capacity of Ugandan public sector health facilities to prevent and control non- communicable diseases: an assessment based upon WHO-PEN standards. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):606. 28. Zhang XH, Lisheng L, Campbell NR, Niebylski ML, Nilsson P, Lackland DT. Implementation of World Health Organization Package of Essential Non- communicable Disease Interventions (WHO PEN) for Primary Health Care in Low-Resource Settings: A Policy Statement From the World Hyperten- sion League. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016;18(1):5–6. 29. Moomba K, Williams A, Savory T, Lumpa M, Chilembo P, Tweya H, et al. Effects of real-time electronic data entry on HIV programme data quality in Lusaka. Zambia Public Health Action. 2020;10(1):47–52. 30. Tesema AG, Ajisegiri WS, Abimbola S, Balane C, Kengne AP, Shiferaw F, et al. How well are non-communicable disease services being integrated into primary health care in Africa: A review of progress against World Health Organization’s African regional targets. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10): e0240984. 31. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recom- mendations for specifying and reporting. Implementation Sci. 2013;8:139. 32. Warner G, Lawson B, Sampalli T, Burge F, Gibson R, Wood S. Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify barriers affecting implementation of an online frailty tool into primary health care: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):395. 33. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into prac- tice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. 34. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7. 35. Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PE. Pragmatic Applications of RE-AIM for Health Care Initiatives in Community and Clinical Settings. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E02. 36. Smith JD, Li DH, Rafferty MR. The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implemen- tation projects. Implement Sci. 2020;15:84. 37. WHO. HEARTS Technical package for cardiovascular disease management in primary health care: evidence-based treatment protocols. Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 2018. Contract No.: 2018 (WHO/NMH/ NVI/18.2). 38. Tateyama Y, Techasrivichien T, Musumari PM, Suguimoto SP, Ongosi AN, Zulu R, et al. Hypertension, its correlates and differences in access to healthcare services by gender among rural Zambian residents: a cross- sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4): e055668. 39. Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2020;75(6):1334–57. 40. IAPAC. IAPAC Protocols for the Integrated Management of HIV and Non- communicable Diseases. Washington, D.C. : International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (IAPAC) 2018. 41. Bauer S, Wa Mwanza M, Chilengi R, Holmes CB, Zyambo Z, Furrer H, et al. Awareness and management of elevated blood pressure among human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapy in urban Zambia: a call to action. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1359923. 42. Limbada M, Macleod D, Situmbeko V, Muhau E, Shibwela O, Chiti B, et al. Rates of viral suppression in a cohort of people with stable HIV from two community models of ART delivery versus facility-based HIV care in Lusaka, Zambia: a cluster-randomised, non-inferiority trial nested in the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial. Lancet HIV. 2022;9(1):e13–23. 43. Hamooya BM, Musonda P, Mutale W, Masenga SK, Halwiindi H, Mutengo KH, et al. Prevalence of low high-density lipoprotein among young adults receiving antiretroviral therapy in Zambia: An opportunity to consider non-communicable diseases in resource-limited settings. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0247004. 44. Mweemba P, Zeller R, Ludwick R, Gosnell D, Michelo C. Validation of the World Health Organization Quality of Life HIV instrument in a Zambian sample. J Assoc Nurs AIDS Care. 2011;22(1):53–66. 45. Nevo D, Lok JJ, Spiegelman D. Analysis of “Learn-as-You-Go” (Lago) Stud- ies. Ann Stat. 2021;49(2):793–819. 46. Varsi C, Ekstedt M, Gammon D, Ruland CM. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Identify Barriers and Facilita- tors for the Implementation of an Internet-Based Patient-Provider Com- munication Service in Five Settings: A Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11):e262-e. 47. Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, et al. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):108. 48. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, meas- urement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and policy in mental health. 2011;38(2):65-76. 49. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 (GBD 2015) Disability Weights Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, 2015. Available from: http:// ghdx. healt hdata. org/ record/ global- burden- disea se- study- 2015- gbd- 2015- disab ility- weigh ts. 50. Janssens B, Van Damme W, Raleigh B, Gupta J, Khem S, Soy Ty K, et al. Offering integrated care for HIV/AIDS, diabetes and hypertension within chronic disease clinics in Cambodia. Bulletin of the World Health Organi- zation. 2007;85(11):880-5. 51. Kar SS, Thakur JS, Jain S, Kumar R. Cardiovascular disease risk manage- ment in a primary health care setting of north India. Indian Heart J. 2008;60(1):19–25. 52. Ajay VS, Jindal D, Roy A, Venugopal V, Sharma R, Pawar A, et al. Develop- ment of a Smartphone-Enabled Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus Management Package to Facilitate Evidence-Based Care Delivery in Primary Healthcare Facilities in India: The mPower Heart Project. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(12). https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-resolution-on-task-shifting-from-the-medical-profession/ https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-resolution-on-task-shifting-from-the-medical-profession/ https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-resolution-on-task-shifting-from-the-medical-profession/ http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/global-burden-disease-study-2015-gbd-2015-disability-weights http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/global-burden-disease-study-2015-gbd-2015-disability-weights http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/global-burden-disease-study-2015-gbd-2015-disability-weights Page 21 of 21Herce et al. Implementation Science Communications (2024) 5:61 53. Ogedegbe G, Plange-Rhule J, Gyamfi J, Chaplin W, Ntim M, Apusiga K, et al. Health insurance coverage with or without a nurse-led task shifting strategy for hypertension control: A pragmatic cluster randomized trial in Ghana. PLoS Med. 2018;15(5): e1002561. 54. Nelissen HE, Cremers AL, Okwor TJ, Kool S, van Leth F, Brewster L, et al. Pharmacy-based hypertension care employing mHealth in Lagos, Nigeria - a mixed methods feasibility study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):934. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub- lished maps and institutional affiliations. Evaluating a multifaceted implementation strategy and package of evidence-based interventions based on WHO PEN for people living with HIV and cardiometabolic conditions in Lusaka, Zambia: protocol for the TASKPEN hybrid effectiveness-implementation steppe Abstract Background Methods Discussion Contributions to the literature Introduction Methods Study design Study setting and population Trial standard of care Trial intervention Study outcomes Randomization and masking Sample size Trial monitoring Study procedures for completion of aim 1 Recruitment and informed consent Study instruments and data collection Data management Learn as you GO (LAGO) methodology Statistical methods for aim 1 Study procedures for completion of aim 2 Study population Data collection Mixed methods study instruments Costing data collection Outcomes Statistical methods overview Costing analysis Qualitative data analysis Results dissemination Discussion Implications Acknowledgements References