Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 BMC Neurology https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03414-0 STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Transforming Parkinson’s Care in Africa (TraPCAf): protocol for a multimethodology National Institute for Health and Care Research Global Health Research Group project R. Walker1,2, N. Fothergill‑Misbah2*, S. Kariuki3, O. Ojo4,5, R. Cilia6, M. C. J. Dekker7,8, O. Agabi4, A. Akpalu9, F. Amod10, M. Breckons2, M. Cham11, S. Del Din12,13, C. Dotchin1,2, S. Guggsa14, J. Kwasa15, D. Mushi16, F. O. Nwaokorie17, T. Park18, L. Rochester12,13, J. Rogathi7,8, F. S. Sarfo19, A. Shalash20, L. Ternent2, S. Urasa7,8 and N. Okubadejo4 Abstract Background Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder and, according to the Global Burden of Disease estimates in 2015, was the fastest growing neurological disorder globally with respect to associated prevalence, disability, and deaths. Information regarding the awareness, diagnosis, phenotypic charac‑ teristics, epidemiology, prevalence, risk factors, treatment, economic impact and lived experiences of people with PD from the African perspective is relatively sparse in contrast to the developed world, and much remains to be learned from, and about, the continent. Methods Transforming Parkinson’s Care in Africa (TraPCAf ) is a multi‑faceted, mixed‑methods, multi‑national research grant. The study design includes multiple sub‑studies, combining observational (qualitative and quantitative) approaches for the epidemiological, clinical, risk factor and lived experience components, as appropriate, and inter‑ ventional methods (clinical trial component). The aim of TraPCAf is to describe and gain a better understanding of the current situation of PD in Africa. The countries included in this National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Group (Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa and Tanzania) represent diverse African geographies and genetic profiles, with differing resources, healthcare systems, health and social protection schemes, and policies. The research team is composed of experts in the field with vast experience in PD, jointly led by a UK‑based and Africa‑based investigator. Discussion Despite the increasing prevalence of PD globally, robust data on the disease from Africa are lacking. Exist‑ ing data point towards the poor awareness of PD and other neurological disorders on the continent and subsequent challenges with stigma, and limited access to affordable services and medication. This multi‑site study will be the first of its kind in Africa. The data collected across the proposed sub‑studies will provide novel and conclusive insights into the situation of PD. The selected country sites will allow for useful comparisons and make results relevant to other low‑ and middle‑income countries. This grant is timely, as global recognition of PD and the public health challenge *Correspondence: N. Fothergill‑Misbah tash.fothergill‑misbah@ncl.ac.uk Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom‑ mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 2 of 17 it poses builds. The work will contribute to broader initiatives, including the World Health Organization’s Intersectoral global action plan on epilepsy and other neurological disorders. Trial registration https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/I SRCT N7701 4546. Keywords Parkinson’s disease, Africa, Diagnosis, Treatment, Epidemiology, Microbiome, Metabolome, Pesticides, Genetics, Prevalence Background Health Organization (WHO) technical brief, +‘Parkin- The population of Africa is growing and ageing faster son disease: a public health approach’, [16] alludes to the than any other region in the world [1]. The African pop- inconsistent data available on PD from low- and middle- ulation aged 65 + is predicted to grow to 570 million income countries (LMICs), and the consequent difficulty by 2100 (for context, the population of all high-income of estimating the true burden in Africa or providing con- nations of the world is projected to reach 387 million by vincing data to motivate governmental policy makers and 2100) [1]. Sub-Saharan African countries will contribute donor agencies to prioritise PD on the continent. Better to over half of the global population increase through understanding of the prevalence of PD in communities 2050. This population expansion and demographic shift would justify prioritising PD, inform national policies, is inadvertently accompanied by an increase in the bur- improve awareness of the disease, improve diagnostic den of non-communicable ageing-related neurological rates, and access to health services, and drive the focus diseases such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia on providing access to pharmacological and non-phar- [2]. Yet ageing, ageing-related issues, and chronic con- macological treatments (e.g., physiotherapy). Until now, ditions associated with later life, are not adequately pri- there has only been one large scale prevalence study of oritised by most African countries. This is despite the PD in SSA, based on a house-to-house survey in Hai, abundance of evidence indicating the significant impact Tanzania, in which less than a quarter of people with PD (e.g., disability and dependency) attributable to such con- (PwP) had previously been diagnosed [17]. Furthermore, ditions, including neurodegenerative diseases [2, 3]. PD identifying the challenges and needs of PwP and their is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder families in different countries and contexts [7, 8] would and, according to the Global Burden of Disease estimates drive the narrative for local evidence-based policies [3]. in 2015, was the fastest growing neurological disorder Africa faces a stark gap in the provision of appropri- globally with respect to the associated prevalence [4], ate neurological workforces and trained physicians [18], disability and deaths [5]. The high burden is fuelled by care, rehabilitation and treatment, making life for PwP increasing longevity, the effects of industrialisation and very difficult [19]. Awareness about PD is generally very environmental factors (for instance, pesticides, air pollu- low among the population [8, 20, 21] and healthcare tion and solvents), and genetic susceptibility [6]. professionals, resulting in under- and delayed diagno- PD demonstrates significant heterogeneity in its cau- sis [10]. Exploring efficient and effective methods for sation (e.g., genetic, and environmental risk factors), diagnosing PD [22] (including use of telemedicine [23, access to specialised care and treatments and, inadvert- 24] and/or novel biomarkers) could facilitate diagnosis ently, quality of life and outcomes. Health disparities can at the primary care level, while offering opportunities affect patient outcomes negatively, and the social impact for early management [16]. Sustainable medication is may vary across cultures [7, 8]. Information regarding the largely inaccessible and unaffordable across the conti- awareness, diagnosis, phenotypic characteristics, epide- nent [18, 25–28], however, investigations into alterna- miology, prevalence, risk factors, treatment, economic tive sources of levodopa (e.g., Mucuna Pruriens (MP)) impact and lived experiences of people with PD from the have yielded positive results [29, 30]. African perspective is relatively sparse in contrast to the Exploring pathophysiological mechanisms and the developed world, and much remains to be learned from, genetic aetiology of PD has the potential to improve and about, the continent [7–12]. understanding of susceptibility, environmental clus- There have been few PD prevalence studies (most tering and response to medication [9]. The develop- from several decades ago) and no community-based ments in genome wide association studies (GWAS) have incidence studies in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [13–15]. largely excluded genetically diverse populations [31]. A Methodological flaws including the small population GWAS of PD among black Africans could provide a valu- sizes surveyed and preponderant reliance on hospital- able source for finding novel genetic determinants that based data have given the erroneous impression that will inform new therapeutics that may eventually ben- PD is rare in Africa. The recently published World efit patients from all populations [32, 33]. Mutations in W alker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 3 of 17 genes commonly associated with PD, such as the Leucine 1. What is the prevalence of PD in Africa? Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene have demonstrated 2. Are there unique risk factors (genetic and/or envi- considerable regional variability, and have been virtu- ronmental) for PD in Africa and are there lessons ally absent in black Africans from sub-Saharan Africa in about PD in general that we can learn from the Afri- studies reported to date [34–37]. This suggests the strong can perspective? possibility that other yet undiscovered genetic factors 3. How can rates of PD diagnosis be improved? may be at play. For example, the recently identified novel 4. Does the clinical phenotype of PD in Africa differ African-ancestry genetic risk factor in GBA1 [38]. Identi- from what has been reported in other populations? fying environmental risks for PD is also crucial [39, 40], 5. How can the quality of PD management in Africa be and may identify a pathway to implement policy change improved? to reduce exposure. PD is increasingly being referred 6. How can affordable and sustainable treatment for PD to as a ‘man-made’ disease [41], with pesticides [42, 43] be provided in Africa? receiving substantial attention as an environmental risk 7. What is the current lived experience of people with factor for the development of PD. There is also strong PD, and their families, in Africa? evidence for important metabolic interactions between the gut microbiome, the gut, the immune system, and the brain [44–48]. Considering the evidence presented, this study pro- Study setting tocol outlines the United Kingdom (UK) National Insti- Seven countries are included in this NIHR GHRG (Egypt, tute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Health Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa and Tan- Research Group (GHRG) on Transforming Parkinson’s zania) (Fig.  1) representing diverse African geographies Care in Africa (TraPCAf) (Award No. NIHR133391). and genetic profiles, with differing resources, healthcare The NIHR is a major funder of high-quality global health systems, health and social protection schemes, and poli- research that addresses the diverse health needs of peo- cies. This multi-country study will be carried out in two ple in LMICs and supports the objectives of the UK Aid research settings, namely within the community and in Strategy and the United Nation’s Sustainable Develop- hospitals (neurology clinics). ment Goals (SDGs) 2015–2030. The overarching aim of All seven countries will be involved in outpatient this research grant is to transform the landscape of PD recruitment (see Table  1 for country sites). These diagnosis, treatment, and care across Africa. The pro- research sites were selected based on the track record tocol can also be accessed through the ISRCTN regis- of research active clinicians, with an interest in PD, able try (https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ ISRCT N7701 4546), where to identify eligible individuals attending outpatient clin- updates on the progress of the study will be documented. ics. All hospitals included in the study are government, university-affiliated, or charitable organisations (not pri- vate), capturing data from most of the population. Methods The prevalence studies will be conducted in Tanzania, TraPCAf is a multi-faceted, mixed-methods, multi- Kenya, Nigeria, and Ghana (as described below), selected national research grant. We report the study methods based on the lack of epidemiological studies, the avail- and design using an adaptation of the Standard Proto- ability of infrastructure and delineated populations for col Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials a prevalence study (i.e., existence of a demographic sur- (SPIRIT) guidelines [49, 50]. The study design includes veillance system or a known denominator population in multiple study aspects, combining observational (quali- representative rural/urban populations) and the facilities tative and quantitative) approaches for the epidemiologi- and staff with prior experience to undertake a house-to- cal, clinical, risk factor and lived experience components, house survey. as appropriate, and interventional methods (clinical trial component). A cross-sectional cohort design is employed for the observational components, while a double-blind randomised controlled trial design is used for the inter- Study design ventional component. The study involves multiple study aspects (Table 2) that will be implemented across the seven countries (Table 1) in order to address the seven research questions above. In Aim and research questions all seven countries, participants will be recruited through The aim of TraPCAf is to describe and gain a better neurology outpatient clinics. In 4 countries (Ghana, understanding of the current situation of PD in Africa, Kenya, Nigeria, and Tanzania) participants will also be addressing the following seven key research questions: recruited through community-based prevalence studies. Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 4 of 17 Fig. 1 TraPCAf participating countries and sites marked with red box Table 1 TraPCAf participating sites and outpatient locations Consenting participants can, but do not need to, participate Country Location Outpatient site in all study aspects. Furthermore, 2 healthy population con- trols of the same ethnicity, matched for gender and age will Egypt Cairo Ain Shams University Hospital be recruited for every 1 PwP, providing the same biological Ethiopia Addis Ababa Tikur Anbessa Specialised Hospital and environmental samples as PwP (RQ2 and RQ3), and Ghana Accra Korle Bu Teaching Hospital undergoing the same clinical assessments (RQ4). Kumasi Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital The inclusion criteria for the prevalence studies are: Sogakope Richard Novati Catholic Hospital Kenya Nairobi Kenyatta National Hospital 1. Consenting resident in the delineated community Nigeria Lagos College of Medicine, University of Lagos for at least 12 months prior to the date of survey. South Africa Durban Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital 2. Age 18 years or older for Tanzania, Kenya, Ghana Tanzania Moshi Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (no upper limit) and > 40 for urban Lagos site. Dar es Salaam Muhimbili Mloganzila Hospital Inclusion criteria for PwP in all studies are: Processes for recruitment 1. Consenting adults aged 18 years or older (no upper PwP identified through outpatient clinics, and through prev- limit) diagnosed with PD based on UK Parkinson’s alence studies, will be invited to participate in TraPCAf, will Disease Brain Bank (UKPDBB) clinical diagnostic be provided with information sheets on each of the different criteria [51] of any stage. aspects of the research (see Table 2), and be able to consent 2. For the Mucuna Pruriens trial, PwP should be to particular study aspects. The clinical assessment (part of treatment naïve (summary of inclusion criteria RQ4) is the minimum involvement a participant can have. detailed in RQ6 section below). W alker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 5 of 17 Table 2 Overview of TraPCAf sub‑studies Research question Outline of work Study component Study details 1. What is the prevalence of PD in Africa? Community, door‑to‑door prevalence studies Door‑to‑door household survey and clinical Community screening and clinical examination. in 4 sites exam 2. Are there unique risk factors (genetic and/ Exploring the biological mechanisms of PD, a) DNA analysis Collection and analysis of blood and saliva or environmental) for PD in Africa and are there conducting genome‑wide association samples. lessons about PD in general that we can learn and exploring the role of the microbiome b) Microbiome and metabolite analysis Collection and analysis of stool and buccal from the African perspective? and pesticide exposure in PD (cheek) samples. c) Pesticide, heavy metal and trichloroethylene Collection and analysis of water, soil, and urine analysis samples. 3. How can rates of PD diagnosis be improved? Development and assessment of aids a) Biological diagnostic tools Collection and analysis of alpha synuclein to diagnosis, including use of screening tools, in blood plasma, blood serum and saliva samples. technologies for gait assessments, and the role Collection and analysis of sebum samples. of biological samples as possible diagnostic b) Technology diagnostic tools Collection and analysis of gait assessments. tools Collection and analysis of neuromotor pen data. Collection and analysis of Optical Computerised Tomography (OCT) data. Collection and analysis of smartphone application data. 4. Does the clinical phenotype of PD in Africa Phenotype PD using clinically validated scales a) Clinical assessment Clinical examination. differ from what has been reported in other and understand progression of PD by follow‑ b) Technology for monitoring progression Collection and analysis of gait assessments. populations? ing up PwP in outpatient settings Collection and analysis of smartphone applica‑ tion data. 5. How can the quality of PD management Understanding current management a) Economic evaluation Economic evaluation of current care and services. in Africa be improved? and improving the management of PD b) Capacity building Understanding the role of video examination through training and telemedicine in PD care. Training of healthcare professionals. 6. How can affordable and sustainable treat‑ Comparing Mucuna Pruriens versus levodopa/ Randomised controlled trial (RCT) Randomisation to MP or levodopa/carbidopa. ment for PD be provided in Africa? carbidopa for the treatment of PD, includ‑ Economic evaluation. ing an economic evaluation to assess cost‑ effectiveness 7. What is the current lived experience of people Exploring the lived experience of PD a) Qualitative interviews Analysis of interviews with PwP, family members with PD in Africa? through qualitative interviews, the develop‑ and stakeholders. ment of information packages and educational b) Community education Development and evaluation of information campaigns, and the establishment of support packages. groups Development and evaluation of educational campaigns. c) Support groups Development and evaluation of support groups for PD. Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 6 of 17 Inclusion criteria for healthy controls are: specific and localised, taking into account national and 1. Consenting healthy, neurologically normal regional considerations, while recognising similarities and (assessed at in-person physical examination) adults trends across communities and nations. aged 18 years or older (no upper limit) who are age, gender and ethnicity matched (per country). Study components Prospective participants will be excluded if they do not The following sections describe the details of the studies consent or lack capacity to consent (clinical judgment), outlined in Table 2, addressing research questions 1–7. and/or are physically unable to complete study proce- All biological samples will be collected by a research dures due to advanced disease and physical disability. nurse at a clinic visit, unless otherwise indicated. All Participants will provide details of medical comorbidi- sites have a material transfer agreement with Newcastle ties, if known, during the clinical examination. University and collected samples will be shipped to New- castle University for analysis in labs with relevant exper- tise. Sites have the option to aliquot samples for analysis Group establishment in situ and for capacity building with expert support and Group establishment began before the awarding of the training. grant, during the proposal development phase. This involved bringing together experts from across the seven RQ1. Prevalence studies in Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, partner countries to develop the aims, research questions and Tanzania and study methods of the grant. Importantly, this devel- To estimate prevalence of PD and/or parkinsonism in opment was guided by our community engagement and Ghana (South Tongu district, Volta region, population involvement (CEI) team. 113,114), Kenya (Kilifi, population 300,000), Nigeria CEI work ensured the research proposal was designed (Lagos, subset of population of 1.8 million), and Tanzania with, and for, people with PwP and their families. A (Hai region, population 180,000), door-to-door house- 2 hour virtual CEI meeting was held with 16 representa- hold screening will be carried out by local, trained health tives from Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, and Ethiopia during workers in their designated areas/villages. Information proposal development to understand their needs, chal- recorded will include village name and precise geograph- lenges and priorities, their interest and willingness to ical location, head of household, date of visit, name of participate, introduce the proposed research and solicit household member, age, and sex. The head of household feedback on the relevance, approach, applicability and will report on behalf of the household (if they are not objectives. For example, the research team highlighted present, anyone over the age of 18 will be able to respond the challenge of diagnosing people in a prevalence study on the household’s behalf ). Data on PD will be collected in contexts where there may not be access to affordable using an adapted screening tool (from methodology ini- or sustainable drug treatment. However, PwP felt that tially described by Dotchin et al. (2008) in Tanzania [17]) knowing a diagnosis would give people a better chance to as follows: manage the disease, avoiding perceptions associated with witchcraft. Considering this, we are confident that under- 1. Do you walk more slowly than other people your age? standing the prevalence of PD across the sites is vital, 2. Do your arms or legs shake? and knowing a diagnosis may outweigh the challenges of 3. Do you shuffle or take short steps when you walk? medication accessibility. The CEI team also echoed the 4. Do you fall easily? need for information about PD burden to push for local 5. Has anyone told you that you have Parkinson’s dis- policy changes. ease? Post-award, the group establishment phase has involved ethics application submissions, mapping research priori- Any positive responders will be reviewed by a study ties, acquiring necessary  consumables,  a review of exist- clinician in the community to determine likely diagno- ing literature on PD from participating countries, and the sis and advised appropriately. If it is thought they might planning of CEI activities in-country. The role of CEI in have PD, they will be invited to an in-person physician this project is to improve the equality, efficacy and impact assessment and neurology examination to determine of responses and services by ensuring that PwP are active diagnosis. Those found not to have PD (or other neuro- stakeholders in the deliberations, design, decision-mak- logical condition) will be provided with referral advice to ing, implementation, and dissemination of the project. an appropriate healthcare facility. Those diagnosed with This will be monitored using the Community Engage- a neurological condition will be registered at the local ment Process Index. Working with CEI representatives clinic for follow-up care. All individuals diagnosed with from each country ensures that our engagement is context Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 7 of 17 PD during the prevalence studies will be invited to par- genotyping platform). Genome-wide analysis data ticipate in further study aspects. comparing PD and controls will also be reported as The primary outcome measures for the prevalence an outcome by the TraPCAf research team in collab- study will be the number of people with idiopathic PD oration with GP2. per 100,000 of the population studied in each country [52], with age standardisation to the WHO population. b) Microbiome and metabolite analysis We will also be reporting on the number of vascular par- Stool samples and buccal swab samples will kinsonism cases per 100,000 population – in view of the be collected using standardised equipment across high rates of undiagnosed and untreated hypertension in all sites from all consenting participants for 16S SSA, we expect there may be high rates of vascular par- sequencing for microbiome analysis  and metabolite kinsonism. The secondary outcome measure will be sex- analysis [54]. All datasets obtained will be identified specific prevalence of PD in Africa (measured as number to bacterial species-level operational taxonomic units of male and female per 100,000 population), again with (OTUs) to differentiate the faecal community com- age-standardisation. position of individuals from the rural and urban com- munities under study. Analysis pipeline to capture RQ2. Risk factors for PD microbiota data on alpha diversity, beta diversity, dif- ferential abundance of microbial taxa and functional a) DNA analysis gene will be utilised [54]. Primary outcome (con- TraPCAf recruitment will link with the Global ducted at baseline) will be the difference between Parkinson’s Genetic Program (GP2) (www. gp2. org) cases and controls. In conjunction with microbiome and the Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s (ASAP) and metabolite analysis, a questionnaire on diet and initiative (www.p arki nsons roadm ap.o rg). The ASAP medication use (see supplementary information) initiative is devoted to accelerating the pace of dis- developed for the purposes of addressing TraPCAf covery and informing the path to a cure for PD research questions will be administered. Samples will through collaboration, research-enabling resources, be linked to individuals’ genotypic and phenotypic and data sharing. GP2 is a resource programme of data to allow for further analysis. the ASAP initiative focused on improving under- standing of the genetic architecture of PD and mak- c) Pesticide, heavy metal and trichloroethylene ing this knowledge globally relevant. analysis To estimate the impact of environmental expo- In summary, genome-wide association stud- sures on the development of PD, water and soil sam- ies and related genomics explorations will be con- ples will be collected using standardised procedures ducted utilising DNA extracted from whole blood from the homes of identified participants who con- and/or saliva samples. The aim of this collaboration sent. This will primarily involve participants recruited is to contribute 1000 samples across TraPCAf sites through the prevalence study but those attending out- (plus 2000 samples from healthy controls), which patient clinics will also be invited to participate in this will be shared with GP2 for analysis and sequencing, study aspect and given the equipment and instructions contributing to GP2’s goal to genotype more than to collect and bring samples from their homes to their 150,000 unique samples from diverse populations. next clinic visit. Samples will be analysed for pesti- cide content, heavy metal content and the presence of We will work closely with our CEI team to deter- trichloroethylene. In conjunction with the analysis, the mine how best to return genetics results for variants mini-environmental risk factor questionnaire (MERQ- whose significance is known (i.e., clinically relevant PD) [55] will be administered in a case–control design information) to PwP and understand what follow up and analysed alongside pesticide data from collected and counselling is available in-country. Where exper- samples. A pesticide and heavy metal exposure ques- tise is lacking, we will work with GP2 to build capac- tionnaire, developed by the TraPCAf team for the pur- ity in genetic counselling. Anonymised genotypic poses of addressing the research question (supplemen- data will be linked with phenotypic data and microbi- tary material), will also be administered to understand ome analyses. The primary outcome will be the Odds historical toxin exposure. ratio (or Hazards ratio) of specified single nucleotide Urine samples will also be collected from con- polymorphisms (SNPs) measured as the frequency of senting participants at the clinic visit and analysed polymorphic variation in PwP versus controls (based for pesticide residue levels to determine individual on the genotyping results from the NeuroChip® [53] exposure. Levels will be compared to previously Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 8 of 17 published results indicating potentially dangerous Metabolome analysis Metabolomics is the analy- exposure. Inclusion of urine samples will provide sis of small molecule metabolites contained within cell, an indication of body burden but also of recent and tissue and biofluid systems. PwP may have a particular continued exposure levels. Environmental risk fac- odour, and this is currently being investigated at the tors for PD will be measured at baseline using (i) University of Manchester (www. mbc.m anche ster.a c. toxicology assessment for contaminants of emerg- uk/b arran group). We are collaborating with the team ing concern related to PD (including pesticides, leading this work to investigate whether metabolites herbicides, other chemicals) in the soil and water can be used to diagnose PD [22, 58] (covered by patent samples at residences of PwP versus healthy con- rights US20230077659A1 and US20230080918A1). trols and (ii) comparison of the risk exposures The team have developed a diagnostic platform, using of PwP and controls based on responses in the mass spectrometry, that can classify PD from sebum MERQ-PD questionnaires and reported as the rela- samples with up to 78–88% accuracy (for detailed tive risk of exposure for each subcategory of risk methodology see [22, 59]). Briefly, sebum samples factors interrogated. will be taken by a research nurse with a cotton bud rubbed on the upper back (a sebum-rich area of the RQ3. Aids to diagnosis for PD body) for metabolite analysis. Primary outcomes for We will explore the diagnostic utility (predictive values) this analysis (conducted at baseline) will be the diag- of several innovative methods for improving the clini- nostic utility of skin metabolites measured in sebum in cal diagnosis of PD. These include the use of biological differentiating PwP from controls. Metabolome sam- markers, as well as technological methods (see Table 2). ples will also be linked with phenotypic and genotypic Primary outcome measures for the sub-studies explor- data. It is important to determine whether the “PD ing aids to diagnosis will include the diagnostic utility, signature” identified is a pure disease-related signa- positive predictive value, accuracy of diagnosis of PD ture and will be detected in Africans with PD, despite versus normal control, area under Receiver Operating genetic, epidemiological, and dietary differences. Find- Characteristics (ROC) curve, negative predictive values, ings will confirm the more widespread utility of swabs sensitivity, and specificity of the diagnostic modalities as a methodology to help diagnose PD and provide described. For all study aspects within this RQ, consent- a unique window into underlying pathophysiology. ing participants will be invited to provide samples, or to This could be particularly useful in Africa, as samples trial the technology tools. remain stable at room temperature for several weeks, facilitating storage and transport. a) Biological diagnostic tools b) Technology diagnostic tools Plasma, serum, saliva, and urine analysis Aggregated alpha-synuclein in brain and periph- Digital mobility outcomes Gait assessment can eral nervous system tissue is a diagnostic feature of discriminate and predict early disease, track disease PD. We are collaborating with a team at Newcas- progression, and identify therapeutic response in tle University, through registered partner company PD [60]. Wearable technology (such as accelerom- ‘ESP Diagnostics’ (www. espdia gnos tics. com) who eters and inertial measurements units (IMUs)) offer have developed an assay for extra-cellular synucle- a low-cost, unobtrusive solution to record the sig- inopathic protein (ESP), that detects recombinant nals needed to extract comprehensive gait features alpha-synuclein aggregation using a fluorescent dye in laboratory and real-world scenarios. Widespread (covered by patent rights (WO2019/171035A10)). development and adoption of commercial sensors This works on urine, blood plasma and blood by the public for activity monitoring demonstrates serum samples, requiring equipment available in their feasibility and acceptability in HICs, but these most hospital biochemistry laboratories (for fur- technologies have been under-utilised in LMICs to ther information on the sensitivity and specificity date. Axivity AX6, a low-cost non-invasive wearable using saliva see [56, 57]). Blood will be taken using device (www.a xivit y.c om/p rodu ct/ ax6) which is a standard blood-taking equipment by a research data logger capable of recording raw data from a suite nurse. For saliva, the participant will spit into a of integrated sensors) [61, 62] will be used to objec- tube. Urine will be collected in a plastic beaker. All tively monitor mobility (walking activity and gait) samples will then be prepared, aliquoted and stored during free-living mobility in PwP. This study aspect appropriately. will initially be rolled out to participants in Ghana, and potentially other sites based on initial outcomes. W alker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 9 of 17 Briefly, the sensor is secured to the participant’s this work, we propose to build on advanced statis- lower back (see [61] for image of placement) who tical models developed by our collaborators in the will be advised to continue with their usual activities ‘OCTAHEDRON’ project at Newcastle University and not change their routine, with monitoring over 7 (www. resear ch.n cl. ac. uk/o ctahe dron) to automati- days [63]. The device quantifies digital mobility based cally identify biomarkers of PD diagnosis in retinal on walking speed, step count, walking bout number OCT scans [69]. Such tools have been developed and duration, for example. The device has previously using data mainly from the eyes of individuals in been validated in the UK [62, 64] and piloted in peo- white populations from high-income countries. We ple with frailty in Tanzania [61], demonstrating fea- aim to validate and tune these models to ensure they sibility. Based on previous estimates (pilot in Tanza- also serve the health needs of LMIC populations nia), we will initially recruit 50 PwP from the Ghana [70]. The increased accessibility of OCT imaging in sites. Gait assessments will also be used to monitor lower resource settings highlights the relevance for disease progression as part of RQ4. diagnostic and disease monitoring. In addition, data collected will allow the exploration of biomarkers for NeuroMotor Pen (NMP) The NMP is a hand-held present and future disease progression to maxim- medical device, developed by ‘Manus Neurodynam- ise the impact of limited clinical resources. All sites ica’ (www. manus neuro.c om), with a unique patented with this equipment available, and with the necessary system combining sensor technologies in a digital expertise to carry out retinal imaging, will be able to pen with software and an analytical engine with Deci- enrol participants to this study aspect. sion Support System. The interface enables users to non-invasively record parameters of minute limb and Oxford smartphone application The ‘Oxford hand motion from graphical tasks and apply auto- Parkinson’s Disease Centre’ in the UK (www.d pag. ox. mated analysis, with high reproducibility [65]. These ac.u k/o pdc) have piloted, tested and refined a 6-min parameters are used as ‘digital biomarkers’ to provide smartphone test of motor symptoms in 522 partici- objective information about movement abnormali- pants with early PD, prodromal Rapid Eye Movement ties. The NMP, designed with a specific intended use (REM) sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) and age- in the clinic, assesses and quantifies motor skills based matched controls, showing accuracies of 85–92% in on simple copying (writing and drawing) tasks that distinguishing PD versus control and RBD versus PD are not dependent on literacy. Unlike wearables, the [71]. Using novel machine learning algorithm MLA NMP measures subtle symptoms that cannot easily data approaches, they can use this smartphone test be seen or quantified with the naked eye and provides to predict motor Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating a test of the extrapyramidal system. Symptoms cur- Scale (UPDRS) with a high level of accuracy, and to rently recorded with the UPDRS, such as bradykinesia predict clinically relevant change, such as the onset and tremor, can be objectively quantified with NMP. of falls, 18 months before occurrence, with positive Previous research suggests that the NMP is a quick, predictive values around 90% [72]. The applicability inexpensive, non-invasive and objective aid to diagno- of this smartphone application to the African con- sis [66]. The NMP has undergone two phases of clini- text will be initially tested in 4 sites, and rolled out cal validation in European cohorts with high differ- to additional sites once usability is better understood. ential diagnostic sensitivity (PD vs not PD) (80%) and The app could be used to accurately distinguish PD high specificity (75%). This technology will be initially from controls (and PD from idiopathic REM sleep piloted with participants in 2 sites, and rolled out to behaviour disorder), providing a growing consensus additional sites after the feasibility of use in lower for the utility of digital biomarkers in early and pro- resource settings is better understood. dromal PD, which could be of particular use in set- tings where specialised clinicians are lacking. The Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imag- smartphone application will also be used to monitor ing People with confirmed and prodromal PD have progression as part of RQ4 been reported to have changes in retinal structure [67]. Retinal imaging via OCT is a quick, non-con- RQ4. Clinical phenotype and progression of PD tact, inexpensive method to detect these changes. It is an infra-red based imaging technology with no a) Clinical assessment eye drops required, making it well tolerated. Yet, retinal changes have yet to be used to detect neu- All PwP, either previously or newly diagnosed rological disease or monitor progression [68]. In from each site, will be invited to a detailed exami- Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 10 of 17 nation and assessment using standard disease spe- other movement disorders, primarily because much cific questionnaires, e.g., the International Parkin- of the physical exam findings are visual [24]. Tel- son and Movement Disorders Society Unified PD emedicine can provide an accessible, cost-effective, Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (see Table  3), in addi- and high-quality healthcare services [90], and pre- tion to study-specific questionnaires developed by sents as a promising avenue for the effective mobi- the research team (see supplementary material). lisation and utilisation of the few neurologists in At yearly intervals we will follow up these cohorts, Africa. Within TraPCAf, video consults will be used including monitoring for disease progression (MDS to aid (confirm) diagnosis and determine feasibility in UPDRS and Hoehn and Yahr scale) and cognitive all sites. This draws on technology developed and tri- decline (using Intervention for Dementia in Elderly alled initially between Toronto and Lagos, and sub- Africans (IDEA) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment sequently elsewhere, including Tanzania and Ghana (MoCA) scores), assessing response to treatment, as part of the African Section of the MDS. Scripted reviewing compliance with medication, and assess- videos are uploaded securely to the internet for ing motor symptoms (MDS-UPDRS total and Part III reporting by movement disorder specialists (see sup- scores) and non-motor symptoms (MDS-NMS) [73]. plementary material). Video consults with scripted videos will be trialled across all sites and follow guid- A PD registry of participants at each site will ance detailed by Duker (2013) [91]. be established, with consent to contact and contact information (including phone numbers and next of Training of healthcare professionals Research kin contact). Participants will be able to consent to and diagnostic capacity building have the potential to follow-up in the future, i.e., beyond the duration of empower African neuroscientists and allied health pro- the grant. In line with this, we will be asking partici- fessionals (AHPs) with the means to develop innova- pants to consent to being followed up and have their tive strategies that address local needs, transfer relevant contact details kept for 20 years after the study end technology, and provide solutions to decrease burden date, with the potential to follow up the cohort. and improve the quality of outcomes for PwP in Africa. Training and capacity building will increase the critical b) Technology for monitoring progression mass of African researchers with the ability to define research priorities, conduct epidemiological research, The digital mobility outcomes and Oxford smart- conduct a diversity of economic impact evaluations, phone application described in ‘Technology diagnos- service delivery appraisals, and strategies for prevention. tic tools’ (RQ3) will also be used to monitor disease Clinical trials and development of non-pharmacological progression. evidence-based treatments remain a high priority. It is thus imperative to build a considerable pool of research- RQ5. Improving PD management in Africa ers and clinicians/healthcare providers proficient in conducting research and providing diagnostic and thera- a) Economic evaluation peutic services and with enough competency to partici- pate meaningfully in collaborative international research, An economic evaluation, involving a mapping who will be the future leaders that will sustain PD exercise of current care provision for PD as well as research, education and clinical competency in Africa. modelling of alternatives to current care, will be car- A survey of the 7 participating countries will ried out. This work will take the form of a cost conse- be conducted to identify training priorities among quence analysis of the diagnosis and management of healthcare professionals. Capacity building initiatives PD, including use of formal health services, alterna- will aim to train neurologists, geriatricians, nurses tive healing (e.g., visits to traditional healers), patient and AHPs in PD management as well as epidemiol- related costs, days lost to care and the impact on eco- ogy, biostatistics, clinical trial methods, bioethics and nomic productivity. These data will be collected as grantsmanship. Ultimately, this will build multidisci- part of the modified RUD questionnaire (Table 3). plinary models of care for PD, informing policy and practice which could be replicated for the manage- ment of other chronic and age-related conditions, b) Capacity building while also building capacity for programme devel- opment at a postgraduate level to ensure long-term Video examination and telemedicine Telemedi- training and research is enabled. The team will build cine programmes are particularly suited to PD, and on past experience running such educational events W alker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 11 of 17 Table 3 Data collection tools to be administered during clinical examination and assessment Tools and questionnaires Clinical observationsa Neurology assessmenta Questionnaire on women’s symptomsa,b Healthcare resource use questionnairea,c MDS Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) [74] Clinical impression of severity index (CISI-PD) [75] MDS Non‑Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) [76] Barthel index [77] Intervention for Dementia in Elderly Africans (IDEA) cognitive screening tool [78] Mini‑environmental risk factor questionnaire (MERQ-PD) [55] Questionnaire on pesticide exposurea Questionnaire on microbiomea PD Questionnaire (PDQ-8) [79] EuroQol‑ 5 Dimension instrument (EQ5D-5L) [80] REM sleep behaviour disorder questionnaire (RBDSQ) [81] Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [82] Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [83] PD Sleep Scale (PDSS) [84] Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) [85] Questionnaire for impulsive‑compulsive disorders in PD – Rating Scale (QUIP-RS) [86] Scales for outcomes in PD – Autonomic (SCOPA-AUT ) [87] a Unvalidated questionnaires developed (based on expertise) for the purposes of addressing TraPCAf research questions (see supplementary material) b Questionnaire developed and adapted from the Fox insight ‘Experience of women with PD’ survey [88] c Questionnaire developed and adapted from the ‘Resource Utilization in Dementia’ (RUD) instrument [89] in Africa (in-person and virtually). For example, the prepared to comply with the double-blind design, i.e., International Parkinson and Movement Disorders mock tablets and mock MP flavoured powder. The trial Society (MDS) ‘Overview of Movement Disorders will use methodology for the current multi-centre trial for Physicians, Nurses and Allied Health Profession- of MP in Ghana (trial registered on Cochrane Central als course’ held in Moshi, Tanzania in 2019, and the Register of Controlled Trials (www.t rial search.w ho.i nt/ ‘MDS-Africa Nurse and Allied Health Professionals Trial2. aspx? Trial ID= PACTR 201611 0018 82367)), where Course for Parkinson’s Disease’ online course held in detailed methods can be found. Methods for the trial are 2021. The team will also utilise the expertise of col- briefly outlined here: laborating organisations, for example, GP2. Inclusion criteria RQ6. Randomised clinical trial of mucuna pruriens (i) age range 30 to 80 years. Mucuna Pruriens (MP) is a levodopa-containing legu- ( ii) diagnosis of clinically probable or clinically estab- minous plant that grows wild in tropical regions of the lished PD according to currently established crite- world. Therefore, MP-based therapy has the potential ria [92]. to replace or supplement levodopa-based medicines in (iii) newly diagnosed PD < 2 years. countries where levodopa is unaffordable and inaccessi- ( iv) never treated with levodopa (drug-naïve) or treated ble due to the low costs of preparation of MP and high for only ≤ 6 months during the disease course but natural availability (up to 9.5% levodopa content) [29]. Levodopa discontinued since at least 3 months. We will undertake a phase II, 12-month, 2-centre dou- ble-blind (participant and investigators), parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (RCT), only in Tanzania, Exclusion criteria addressing the drug naïveiority of MP versus levodopa/ carbidopa (which is the reference treatment) for the (i) dementia according to DSM-V criteria precluding treatment of PD in drug-naïve PwP. Medication will be the subject to provide written informed consent. Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 12 of 17 (ii) clinically significant psychiatric illness (e.g., severe RQ7. Lived experience of PD depression or psychosis). (iii) Hoehn and Yahr stage 5/5 [93]. a) Qualitative study (iv) severe, unstable medical conditions (e.g., neo- plasms; unstable diabetes mellitus; heart, renal or A qualitative study to understand lived experi- liver failure). ences of PD will be conducted across all 7 African (v) pregnancy. sites. Semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews exploring diagnostic journeys, use of healthcare, Sample size The sample size [52] sufficient to have a care structures, experiences of stigma, among other power of 80% with a two-tailed type-I error of 20% to emerging aspects, will be carried out with PwP and detect clinically meaningful difference (effect size of primary caregivers. A purposive sample of 20 PwP 0.5 according to Cohen [94]) is 74 patients (37 per each and 20 caregivers (with consent from PwP), totalling intervention). A drop-out rate of 20% was considered 360 participants, will be recruited from each site in for the final sample size calculation [95], resulting in 45 order to get a representative sample of, for example, patients per treatment arm. Randomised allocation will age, gender, disease stage, disease duration, socioeco- be performed according to a computer-generated rand- nomic status. Furthermore, healthcare professionals omization list concealed by sealed envelopes. and policy makers will be invited to interview about their experience of PD (n = 20 per country). The pri- Outcome measures The primary outcome is the non- mary outcome will be descriptions of lived experi- inferiority of MP as measured by motor UPDRS subsec- ences of PwP across, and within, different sites. We tion score change over the time frame of the trial. The aim to understand what similarities populations main secondary outcome is the summary index of the experience with regards to PD, and where differences PDQ-8. Six assessments will take place at baseline, 1–3- exist to inform future interventions to support PwP 6–9-12 months and at end of the study. The titration and caregivers in the community and inform policy phase is 4 weeks in which levodopa dose will be slowly to support their care. titrated up to 4.5 mg/kg/day in three doses. Patients are randomised either to 40 weeks treatment with MP pow- b) Community education der or to 40 weeks treatment with levodopa/carbidopa Working closely with our CEI team, we will look tablets. An additional secondary outcome will be objec- at ways to increase awareness of PD in communi- tive measuring motor performance using the Oxford ties, utilising local media outlets, training events, and smartphone app (detailed in 2.5.3). awareness-raising activities. The CEI team will lead on the development of culturally-specific informa- Data handling With regards to data handling, and to tion packages for PwP and caregivers in local lan- ensure privacy and confidentiality, all participants will be guages (where resources are not available already). pseudonymised. To minimise bias, only the lead inves- Ministries of Health will be involved from the outset tigator will be authorised to input patient data. Data is to maximise the potential for translating research password protected, for intended purposes only and will findings into practice. A needs assessment will guide be kept confidential and stored securely in a lockable the specific requirements of each site. cabinet that can be assessed by the lead investigator. c) Support groups Trial economic evaluation An economic evaluation Support groups play an important role in care will be conducted alongside the MP trial, comprised of and support for PwP and caregivers, while also filling a cost-utility analysis based on the incremental cost per in gaps in information and services that many health quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, based on the systems in low resource settings are unable to pro- participants’ responses to the EQ5D-5L questionnaire vide [96]. Therefore, PD support groups are impor- sand PDQ8. Intervention and follow up costs will also be tant components within these settings, ensuring PwP calculated from the perspective of formal health service and their families have the support they need, and a used and additional costs incurred by patients. We aim platform to advocate for PD. Support groups already to estimate the cost of the interventions, subsequent use exist in five of the seven countries we are working in. of services and additional costs to participants and their Support groups will be established in the two sites families to inform the cost-effectiveness and cost–benefit that do not already have groups (Egypt and Tanza- of MP versus levodopa/carbidopa. nia). Additional groups, focussed on more rural areas of our seven countries, will also be established. A vir- Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 13 of 17 tual support group, facilitated by our CEI partners, Ethical approval is already in place in Tanzania, Ghana Parkinson’s Africa, will also be made available to all and Nigeria at time of protocol publication, and will be in PwP and caregivers involved in TraPCAf. place in other sites before recruitment commences. As stated in our ethical approval, all research partici- Data analysis and management pants will be required to give fully informed, written A Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database, consent to participate in any study aspect. All potential hosted at Newcastle University (UK), has been built and participants will be given an information sheet and will will be used to store all questionnaire data across sites. be able to read the information (translated in local lan- Data will be analysed using standard statistical software guages as appropriate) or have it read to them. Partici- packages (Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), pants will have the opportunity to ask questions about company of manufacture). Biological and environmental the project and can consent to the aspects of the study samples will be linked to questionnaire data on RED- they want to be involved with. Participants will not be Cap through associated barcodes (biobank) and samples taking part in any study aspect without knowing the stored at Newcastle University for analysis, or onward details of the study and their participation rights. Those transfer, as described. Technology data will be transferred who are unable to write (e.g., illiterate) will be able and uploaded to secure cloud servers and processed by to provide a thumb print on the consent form or have the technology owners (our collaborators). a witness append the form on their behalf, with verbal Data will be summarised using descriptive statistics consent. Participants will also be able to consent to fol- appropriate to the nature of the data (e.g., mean, median, low up in the clinical aspect of the study. The only situ- standard deviation, inter-quartile range, frequency). ation where participants may not be able to give full Bivariate inferential tests and multivariable modelling informed consent is if they lack capacity; this will be for will be used where appropriate. For the prevalence study, a very small group of individuals and is necessary for data will be presented as proportions of the denomina- the prevalence studies. In these cases, consent will be tor population, with sub-group analysis by sex and age obtained from their next of kin and we will gain their bands. Confidence interval generation will assume a verbal assent. Their further involvement in the study will bivariate distribution. For the RCT, independent sam- be minimal. ple t-test will be applied, with either multilevel logistic Participants will receive a debriefing sheet after their regression or a mixed linear model during secondary participation in the study, which will provide a lay sum- analysis to adjust for baseline score, treatment site, demo- mary of how the data collected will be stored and used graphic and disease factors not adjusted for by randomi- to transform the Parkinson’s landscape in Africa, as well sation. For screening tools, accuracy will be compared as reiterating their participation rights (e.g., right to with- to the gold standard of expert physician opinion. The draw until data have been aggregated for analysis and primary measure of criterion validity will be area under reporting) and contact details for the study team. If they the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. consent, participants will also be linked with support Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values will also be groups in-country and our charity partner network. reported. Qualitative data will be managed using NVivo qualitative data analysis computer software and analysis Discussion will be based on principles of Thematic Analysis [97]. Despite the increasing prevalence of PD globally, robust Data will initially be coded using a mixture of deduc- data on the disease from Africa are lacking. Existing tive and inductive coding after which coded data will be data point towards the poor awareness of PD and other analysed to identify key themes, which will emerge from neurological disorders on the continent and subsequent the data (not pre-identified). Throughout the lifecycle challenges with stigma, and limited access to affordable of the project, CEI advisory groups will feed back to the services and medication. research team on data collection tools, recruitment and This multi-site study will be the first of its kind in be involved in preliminary analysis, as well as the devel- Africa. The research team is composed of experts in opment of appropriate methods for dissemination of the field with vast experience in PD (both clinical and findings to communities. research), jointly led by a UK-based and Africa-based investigator. We anticipate that the data collected across Ethics approvals and consent to participate the proposed studies will provide novel and conclusive Ethical approval for this study was granted by Faculty insights into the situation of PD on the continent through of Medical Sciences Research Ethics Committee, part of a deep understanding of those already accessing care Newcastle University’s Research Ethics Committee on and services, and persons with PD in the community 1st February 2023 (Application No. 2453/26903/2021). who may have never obtained a diagnosis. The selected Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 14 of 17 country sites will allow for useful comparisons and make LRRK2 Leucine Rich Repeat Kinase 2 results relevant to other LMICs. The grant will also pro- MDS International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society MERQ‑PD: Mini‑Environmental Risk factor Questionnaire‑Parkinson’s disease vide opportunities for further studies driven by research- MJFF Michael J Fox Foundation ers in the TraPCAf sites and beyond and build a platform MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment for launching other collaborations including genomics NIH N ational Institutes for Health NIHR National Institute for Health and Care Research and gene-environment studies and exploring the impact NMP N euroMotor Pen of CEI activities and longitudinal studies on outcomes NMSS Non‑Motor Symptoms Scale (including patient-reported outcomes). OCT Optical Coherence Tomography OTU O perational Taxonomic Units The limitations of the overall study mainly relate to the PD Parkinson’s disease scope of the work to be conducted within allocated budg- PDQ8 Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire ets. Efficient and effective communication across sites PDSS P D Sleep Scale PwP P eople with Parkinson’s disease and within the research team is crucial to ensure posi- QALY Q uality‑Adjusted Life Year tive outcomes. Furthermore, feedback and input from the QUIP‑RS: Q uestionnaire for Impulsive‑Compulsive disorders in PD Rating CEI team, as well as our External Advisory Group, and Scale RBDSQ R apid eye movement sleep Behaviour Disorder Questionnaire funders, will ensure the grant’s success. We are aware of RCT R andomised Controlled Trial the issues relating to access to medicines, particularly for REDCap R esearch Electronic Data Capture those who are diagnosed during the prevalence studies. SCOPA‑AUT: S cales for Outcomes in PD Autonomic SDGs Sustainable Development Goals Hence, the role of advocacy in tandem with the research SNP S ingle Nucleotide Polymorphism is crucial to ensure that we build capacity and awareness SSA Sub‑Saharan Africa in each country. We are particularly keen to enable access SPIRIT Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials to affordable and sustainable medication and are working SPSS S tatistical Package for Social Sciences with WHO and charitable foundations in respect to this. TraPCAf T ransforming Parkinson’s Care in Africa Although the seven African countries broadly repre- UKPDBB U K Parkinson’s Disease Brain Bank UPDRS U nified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale sent different regions of the continent, we are necessar- WHO W orld Health Organization ily limited to forging relationships and networks with active neurologists and researchers. Findings from this Supplementary Information grant will enable us to replicate the work packages in The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. other African countries, where even less is known about org/1 0.1 186/ s12883‑0 23‑ 03414‑0. PD, through our capacity building initiatives. We hope to facilitate further training in countries where there are Additional file 1. few, or no, neurologists in collaboration with organisa- Additional file 2. tions such as the International Parkinson and Movement Additional file 3. Disorders Society (MDS), as well as grow patient net- Additional file 4. works in these countries. Additional file 5. This grant is timely, as global recognition of PD and Additional file 6. the public health challenge it poses builds. The work will contribute to broader initiatives, such as the WHO’s Acknowledgements Intersectoral Global Action Plan on epilepsy and other The authors would like to thank the TraPCAf project management team neurological disorders [2] and align with the recom- at Newcastle University for their support. The authors would also like mendations outlined in the Parkinson Disease technical to thank the Editor for their helpful feedback and comments on the manuscript. brief [16]. Authors’ contributions NFM wrote the manuscript. RW and NO contributed to writing the manu‑ Abbreviations script and reviewed and approved the final manuscript. SK, OO, RC, MCJD, ASAP Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s OA, AA, FA, MB, MC, SDD, CD, SG, JK, DM, FON, TP, LR, JR, FSS, AS, LT and SU AUROC A rea Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic all provided feedback on a draft manuscript and read and approved the CEI C ommunity Engagement and Involvement final manuscript. CISI C linical Impression of Severity Index ESP Extra‑cellular Synucleinopathic Protein Funding ESS Epworth Sleepiness Scale This study is funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research EQ5D 5L E uroQol 5 Dimensions (NIHR) in the UK (Award No. NIHR133391). The funding body provided peer GHRG G lobal Health Research Group review prior to awarding the research grant but did not play a role in the GP2 G lobal Parkinson’s Genetics Program design of the study, nor will they have a role in the proposed data collection, GWAS G enome‑Wide Association Study management, analysis or interpretation of data. HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale IDEA Intervention for Dementia in Elderly Africans Availability of data and materials LMICs Low‑ and Middle‑Income Countries Not applicable. W alker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 15 of 17 Declarations Received: 13 June 2023 Accepted: 29 September 2023 Ethics approval and consent to participate Ethical approval to conduct this survey was obtained from Newcastle Univer‑ sity Faculty of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee in February 2023 (applica‑ tion number 2453/26903/2021). In‑country ethics approvals are either in place References or in process at the time of publication. All methods will be carried out in 1. World Population Prospects 2022, Download Files, [https://p opula tion. un. accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent will be org/ wpp/ Downl oad/ Stand ard/P opula tion/ ]. obtained from all subjects prior to their participation in any study aspect. 2. World Health Organization: Web‑based consultation on the first draft of the Intersectoral Global Action Plan on epilepsy and other neurological Consent for publication disorders 2022–2031. In. Geneva; 2021. Not applicable. 3. Schiess N, Cataldi R, Okun MS, Fothergill‑Misbah N, Dorsey ER, Bloem BR, Barretto M, Bhidayasiri R, Brown R, Chishimba L et al: Six Action Steps to Competing interests Address Global Disparities in Parkinson Disease: A World Health Organiza‑ Roberto Cilia has received speaking honoraria from Zambon Italia; Zambon SAU; tion Priority. JAMA Neurology 2022. Bial Italia Srl; Advisory board fees from Bial; Research support from the Italian 4. Dorsey ER, Elbaz A, Nichols E, Abd‑Allah F, Abdelalim A, Adsuar JC, Ministry of Health (Principal Investigator of the project GR‑2018–12366771 and Ansha MG, Brayne C, Choi J‑YJ, Collado‑Mateo D, et al. Global, regional, Co‑ Principal Investigator of the project PNRR‑MR1‑2022–12376921); Editor‑in‑chief and national burden of Parkinson’s disease, 1990–2016: a systematic of the neuromuscular and movement disorders section of Brain Sciences; Associate analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. Editor of Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, Frontiers in Neuroscience section 2018;17(11):939–53. Neurodegeneration and Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 5. GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators: Global, regional, and national Silvia Del Din reports consultancy activity with Hoffmann‑La Roche Ltd. burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for outside of this study. SDD was also supported by the Mobilise‑D project the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology 2019, that has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint 18(5):459–480. Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No. 820820. This JU receives support 6. Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C. Parkinson’s disease. The Lancet. from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 2021;397(10291):2284–303. and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations 7. Mshana G, Dotchin CL, Walker RW. “We call it the shaking illness”: percep‑ (EFPIA). SDD was also supported by the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 tions and experiences of Parkinson’s disease in rural northern Tanzania. Joint Undertaking (IMI2 JU) project IDEA‑FAST—Grant Agreement 853981. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(219):1–8. SDD was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 8. Fothergill‑Misbah N. The lived experience of stigma and parkinson’s Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) based at The Newcastle upon disease in Kenya: a public health challenge. BMC Public Health. Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle University and the Cumbria, 2023;23(1):364. Northumberland and Tyne and Wear (CNTW) NHS Foundation Trust. SDD and 9. Dekker MCJ, Coulibaly T, Bardien S, Ross OA, Carr J, Komolafe M. Parkin‑ LR were supported by the NIHR/Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility (CRF) son’s Disease research on the African continent: obstacles and opportuni‑ infrastructure at Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. ties. Front Neurol. 2020;11:512. Oluwadamilola Ojo receives Honoraria from the International Parkinson and 10. Fothergill‑Misbah N, Walker R, Kwasa J, Hooker J, Hampshire K. “Old peo‑ Movement Disorder Society (MDS) for educational courses on Movement Disor‑ ple problems”, uncertainty and legitimacy: Challenges with diagnosing ders as Faculty and support for attending meetings and/or travel, and funding Parkinson’s disease in Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 2021;282: 114148. for a leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy 11. Cilia R, Akpalu A, Sarfo FS, Cham M, Amboni M, Cereda E, Fabbri M, Adjei group, paid or unpaid—Member, Executive Committee, MDS African Section. P, Akassi J, Bonetti A, et al. The modern pre‑levodopa era of Parkinson’s Njideka Okubadejo receives research grants from the Michael J Fox Founda‑ disease: insights into motor complications from sub‑Saharan Africa. Brain. tion for Parkinson’s Research (Parkinson Progression Markers Initiative and PD 2014;137(10):2731–42. Genetic Diversity in Africa) and Honorarium from the International Parkinson 12. Cilia R, Cereda E, Akpalu A, Sarfo FS, Cham M, Laryea R, Obese V, Oppon and Movement Disorder Society (IPMDS). K, Del Sorbo F, Bonvegna S, et al. Natural history of motor symptoms in Lynn Rochester is a member of Endpoints Advisory Group—MJ Fox Founda‑ Parkinson’s disease and the long‑duration response to levodopa. Brain. tion and receives consultancy for the role. 2020;143(8):2490–501. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests. 13. Williams U, Bandmann O, Walker R. Parkinson’s Disease in Sub‑Saharan Africa: a review of epidemiology, genetics and access to care. J Mov Author details Disord. 2018;11(2):53–64. 1 Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 14. Quarshie JT, Mensah EN, Quaye O, Aikins AR. The Current State of 2 Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Parkinsonism in West Africa: a systematic review. Parkinson’s Disease. UK. 3 Neuroscience Unit, KEMRI‑Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya. 2021;2021:7479423. 4 College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria. 5 Lagos University Teaching 15. Blanckenberg J, Bardien S, Glanzmann B, Okubadejo NU, Carr JA. The Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. 6 Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione prevalence and genetics of Parkinson’s disease in sub‑Saharan Africans. J IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy. 7 Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Neurol Sci. 2013;335(1–2):22–5. Centre, Moshi, Tanzania. 8 Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, 16. World Health Organization. Parkinson disease: a public health approach. Tanzania. 9 University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Geneva: Technical Brief. In; 2022. Ghana. 10 University of KwaZulu‑Natal, Durban, South Africa. 11 Richard Novati Catho‑ 17. Dotchin C, Msuya O, Kissima J, Massawe J, Mhina A, Moshy A, Aris E, Jusa‑ lic Hospital, Sogakope, Ghana. 12 Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty bani A, Whiting D, Masuki G, et al. The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease in of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 13 National rural Tanzania. Mov Disord. 2008;23(11):1567–672. Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre 18. Hamid E, Ayele BA, Massi DG, Ben Sassi S, Tibar H, Djonga EE, El‑Sadig SM, (BRC), Newcastle University and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation El Khedoud AW, Razafimahefa J, Kouame‑Assouan AE et al: Availability of Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 14 Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. therapies and services for Parkinson’s Disease in Africa: a continent‑wide 15 Department of Clinical Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, survey. Mov Disord 2021, n/a(n/a). Kenya. 16 Institute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, 19. World Health Organization (WHO): Atlas: country resources for neurologi‑ Moshi, Tanzania. 17 Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Basic Medi‑ cal disorders ‑ 2nd ed. In. Geneva: World Health Organization,; 2017. cal Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria. 18 Parkinson’s 20. Kaddumukasa M, Kakooza A, Kaddumukasa MN, Ddumba E, Mugenyi L, Africa, Kingston upon Thames, UK. 19 Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Sajatovic M, Katabira E. Knowledge and attitudes of Parkinson’s Disease in Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. 20 Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Rural and Urban Mukono District, Uganda: a cross‑sectional. Community‑ Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Based Study Parkinson’s Disease. 2015;2015(196150):1–7. Walker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 16 of 17 21. Mokaya J, Gray WK, Carr J. Beliefs, knowledge and attitudes towards 43. Vaccari C, Dib R, Gomaa H, Lopes L, De Camargo JL. Paraquat and Par‑ Parkinson’s disease among a Xhosa speaking black population in South kinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of observational Africa: a cross‑sectional study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;41:51–7. studies. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev, Part B. 2019;22:1–31. 22. Trivedi DK, Sinclair E, Xu Y, Sarkar D, Walton‑Doyle C, Liscio C, Banks P, 44. Chen S‑J, Lin C‑H. Gut microenvironmental changes as a potential Milne J, Silverdale M, Kunath T, et al. Discovery of volatile biomarkers of trigger in Parkinson’s disease through the gut–brain axis. J Biomed Sci. Parkinson’s disease from Sebum. ACS Cent Sci. 2019;5(4):599–606. 2022;29(1):54. 23. Cubo E, Doumbe J, Njiengwe E, Onana P, Garoña R, Alcalde J, Seco J, 45. Keshavarzian A, Engen P, Bonvegna S, Cilia R. The gut microbiome in Parkin‑ Mariscal N, Epundugu BM, Cubo S, et al. A Parkinson’s disease tele‑ son’s disease: a culprit or a bystander? Prog Brain Res. 2020;252:357–450. education program for health care providers in Cameroon. J Neurol Sci. 46. Herrick MK, Tansey MG. Is LRRK2 the missing link between inflammatory 2015;357(1–2):285–7. bowel disease and Parkinson’s disease? NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2021;7(1):26. 24. Shalash A, Spindler M, Cubo E. Global perspective on telemedicine for 47. Gorecki AM, Dunlop SA, Rodger J, Anderton RS: The gut‑brain axis and Parkinson’s Disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11:S11–8. gut inflammation in Parkinson’s disease: stopping neurodegeneration at 25. Dotchin CL, Msuya O, Walker RW. The challenge of Parkinson’s disease the toll gate. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2020:1–4. management in Africa. Age Ageing. 2007;36(2):122–7. 48. Scheperjans F, Derkinderen P, Borghammer P. The Gut and Parkinson’s 26. Mokaya J, Dotchin CL, Gray WK, Hooker J, Walker RW. The Accessibility Disease: hype or hope? J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8(s1):S31–9. of Parkinson’s Disease Medication in Kenya: Results of a National Survey. 49. Chan A‑W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016;3(4):376–81. Dickersin K, Hróbjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, et al. SPIRIT 2013 27. Okubadejo NU, Ojo OO, Wahab KW, Abubakar SA, Obiabo OY, Salawu FK, explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. Nwazor EO, Agabi OP, Oshinaike OO. A nationwide survey of Parkinson’s 2013;346:e7586. disease medicines availability and affordability in Nigeria. Mov Disord Clin 50. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža‑Jerić Pract. 2019;6(1):27–33. K, Hróbjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 state‑ 28. GBD 2015 Neurological Disorders Collaborator Group: Global, regional, ment: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990–2015: a sys‑ 2013;158(3):200–7. tematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet 51. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Neurology 2017, 16(11):877–897. idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico‑pathological study of 100 cases. J 29. Fothergill‑Misbah N, Maroo H, Cham M, Pezzoli G, Walker R, Cilia R. Could Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55(3):181–4. Mucuna pruriens be the answer to Parkinson’s disease management in 52. Hajian‑Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in epidemiologic studies. Caspian J sub‑Saharan Africa and other low‑income countries worldwide? Parkin‑ Intern Med. 2011;2(4):289–98. sonism Relat Disord. 2020;73:3–7. 53. Blauwendraat C, Faghri F, Pihlstrom L, Geiger JT, Elbaz A, Lesage S, Corvol 30. Cilia R, Laguna J, Cassani E, Cereda E, Raspini B, Barichella M, Pezzoli J‑C, May P, Nicolas A, Abramzon Y, et al. NeuroChip, an updated version of G. Daily intake of Mucuna pruriens in advanced Parkinson’s disease: a the NeuroX genotyping platform to rapidly screen for variants associated 16‑week, noninferiority, randomized, crossover, pilot study. Parkinsonism with neurological diseases. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;57:247.e249‑247.e213. Relat Disord. 2018;49:60–6. 54. Barichella M, Severgnini M, Cilia R, Cassani E, Bolliri C, Caronni S, Ferri V, 31. Okubadejo N, Britton A, Crews C, Akinyemi R, Hardy J, Singleton A, Bras Cancello R, Ceccarani C, Faierman S, et al. Unraveling gut microbiota in Par‑ J. Analysis of Nigerians with apparently sporadic Parkinson disease for kinson’s disease and atypical parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2019;34(3):396–405. mutations in LRRK2, PRKN and ATXN3. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(10): e3421. 55. Mini environmental risk questionnaire (MERQ) ‑ PD [https:// commo ndata 32. Gurdasani D, Carstensen T, Tekola‑Ayele F, Pagani L, Tachmazidou I, eleme nts.n inds.n ih. gov/ Parkin son% 27s% 20Dis ease]. Hatzikotoulas K, Karthikeyan S, Iles L, Pollard MO, Choudhury A, et al. 56. Vivacqua G, Mason M, De Bartolo MI, Węgrzynowicz M, Calò L, Belvisi The African Genome Variation Project shapes medical genetics in Africa. D, Suppa A, Fabbrini G, Berardelli A, Spillantini M. Salivary α‑Synuclein Nature. 2015;517(7534):327–32. RT‑QuIC Correlates with Disease Severity in de novo Parkinson’s Disease. 33. Genomics England: The National Genomic Research Library v5.1. In.: Mov Disord. 2023;38(1):153–5. Genomics England Limited; 2020. 57. Luan M, Sun Y, Chen J, Jiang Y, Li F, Wei L, Sun W, Ma J, Song L, Liu J, 34. Cilia R, Sironi F, Akpalu A, Cham M, Sarfo FS, Brambilla T, Bonetti A, et al. Diagnostic value of salivary real‑time quaking‑induced conver‑ Amboni M, Goldwurm S, Pezzoli G. Screening LRRK2 gene mutations in sion in Parkinson’s Disease and multiple system atrophy. Mov Disord. patients with Parkinson’s disease in Ghana. J Neurol. 2012;259(3):569–70. 2022;37(5):1059–63. 35. Rizig M, Ojo OO, Athanasiou‑Fragkouli A, Agabi OP, Oshinaike OO, Houl‑ 58. Morgan J. Joy of super smeller: sebum clues for PD diagnostics. Lancet den H, Okubadejo NU. Negative screening for 12 rare LRRK2 pathogenic Neurol. 2016;15(2):138–9. variants in a cohort of Nigerians with Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol 59. Géhin C, Tokarska J, Fowler SJ, Barran PE, Trivedi DK. No skin off your back: Aging. 2021;99:101.e115‑101.e119. the sampling and extraction of sebum for metabolomics. Metabolomics. 36. Okubadejo NU, Rizig M, Ojo OO, Jonvik H, Oshinaike O, Brown E, Houlden 2023;19(4):21. H. Leucine rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) GLY2019SER mutation is absent in 60. Morris R, Lord S, Bunce J, Burn D, Rochester L. Gait and cognition: map‑ a second cohort of Nigerian Africans with Parkinson disease. PLoS ONE. ping the global and discrete relationships in ageing and neurodegenera‑ 2018;13(12): e0207984. tive disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;64:326–45. 37. Okubadejo NU. An analysis of genetic studies of Parkinson’s disease in 61. Del Din S, Lewis EG, Gray WK, Collin H, Kissima J, Rochester L, Dotchin C, Africa. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2008;14(3):177–82. Urasa S, Walker R: Monitoring walking activity with wearable technology 38. Rizig M, Bandres‑Ciga S, Makarious MB, Ojo O, Crea PW, Abiodun O, et al. in rural‑dwelling older adults in Tanzania: a feasibility study nested within Genome‑wide Association Identifies Novel Etiological Insights Associated a frailty prevalence study. Experimental Aging Research 2020:1–15. with Parkinson’s Disease in African and African Admixed Populations. 62. Palmerini L, Reggi L, Bonci T, Del Din S, Micó‑Amigo ME, Salis F, Bertuletti medRxiv [Preprint]. 2023. https:// doi. org/1 0. 1101/2 023. 05.0 5. 232895 29. S, Caruso M, Cereatti A, Gazit E, et al. Mobility recorded by wearable 39. Warner TT, Schapira AHV. Genetic and environmental factors in the cause devices and gold standards: the Mobilise‑D procedure for data standardi‑ of Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2003;53(S3):S16–25. zation. Scientific Data. 2023;10(1):38. 40. Dardiotis E, Xiromerisiou G, Hadjichristodoulou C, Tsatsakis AM, Wilks MF, 63. Packer E, Debelle H, Bailey HGB, Ciravegna F, Ireson N, Evers J, Niessen M, Shi Hadjigeorgiou GM. The interplay between environmental and genetic JQ, Yarnall AJ, Rochester L, et al. Translating digital healthcare to enhance factors in Parkinson’s disease susceptibility: the evidence for pesticides. clinical management: a protocol for an observational study using a digital Toxicology. 2013;307:17–23. health technology system to monitor medication adherence and its effect 41. Dorsey E, Bloem B. The Parkinson pandemic‑a call to action. JAMA Neurol. on mobility in people with Parkinson’s. BMJ Open. 2023;13(9): e073388. 2018;75(1):9–10. 64. Del Din S, Galna B, Godfrey A, Bekkers EMJ, Pelosin E, Nieuwhof F, Mirel‑ 42. Tangamornsuksan W, Lohitnavy O, Sruamsiri R, Chaiyakunapruk N, man A, Hausdorff JM, Rochester L. Analysis of free‑living gait in older Norman Scholfield C, Reisfeld B, Lohitnavy M. Paraquat exposure and adults with and without Parkinson’s Disease and with and without a Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Arch Environ history of falls: identifying generic and disease‑specific characteristics. J Occup Health. 2019;74(5):225–38. Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(4):500–6. W alker et al. BMC Neurology (2023) 23:373 Page 17 of 17 65. Smits EJ, Tolonen AJ, Cluitmans L, van Gils M, Zietsma RC, Tijssen MAJ, 85. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Maurits NM. Reproducibility of standardized fine motor control tasks and Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep. 1991;14(6):540–5. age effects in healthy adults. Measurement. 2018;114:177–84. 86. Weintraub D, Hoops S, Shea JA, Lyons KE, Pahwa R, Driver‑Dunckley ED, 66. Smits EJ, Tolonen AJ, Cluitmans L, van Gils M, Zietsma RC, Borgemeester Adler CH, Potenza MN, Miyasaki J, Siderowf AD, et al. Validation of the RW, van Laar T, Maurits NM. Graphical tasks to measure upper limb func‑ questionnaire for impulsive‑compulsive disorders in Parkinson’s disease. tion in patients with Parkinson’s Disease: validity and response to dopa‑ Mov Disord. 2009;24(10):1461–7. minergic medication. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017;21(1):283–9. 87. Visser M, Marinus J, Stiggelbout AM, Van Hilten JJ. Assessment of auto‑ 67. Lee JY, Ahn J, Oh S, Shin JY, Kim YK, Nam H, Jeon B. Retina thickness as nomic dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: The SCOPA‑AUT. Mov Disord. a marker of neurodegeneration in prodromal lewy body disease. Mov 2004;19(11):1306–12. Disord. 2020;35(2):349–54. 88. Mathur S, LaMonica K, Matthews H, Hill K. Self‑image in women with 68. Lee JY, Ahn J, Kim TW, Jeon BS. Optical coherence tomography in Parkinson’s Parkinson’s Disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2023;13(3):329–32. disease: is the retina a biomarker? J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(2):197–204. 89. Wimo A, Jonsson L, Zbrozek A. The resource utilization in dementia (RUD) 69. Kafieh R, Rakhshani S, Hogg J, Lawson RA, Pavese N, Innes W, Steel DH, instrument is valid for assessing informal care time in community‑living Bacardit J, Read J, Hurlbert A: A robust, flexible retinal segmentation patients with dementia. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14(8):685–90. algorithm designed to handle neuro‑degenerative disease pathol‑ 90. Cubo E, Delgado‑López PD. Telemedicine in the management of Parkin‑ ogy (NDD‑SEG). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2022, son’s Disease: achievements, challenges, and future perspectives. Brain 63(7):2080 – F0069–2080 – F0069. Sci. 2022;12(12):1735. 70. Wagner SK, Hughes F, Cortina‑Borja M, Pontikos N, Struyven R, Liu X, 91. Duker AP: Video recording in movement disorders: practical issues. Con‑ Montgomery H, Alexander DC, Topol E, Petersen SE, et al. AlzEye: longitu‑ tinuum (Minneap Minn) 2013, 19(5 Movement Disorders):1401–1405. dinal record‑level linkage of ophthalmic imaging and hospital admissions 92. Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, Obeso J, of 353 157 patients in London, UK. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3): e058552. Marek K, Litvan I, Lang AE, et al. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkin‑ 71. Arora S, Baig F, Lo C, Barber TR, Lawton MA, Zhan A, Rolinski M, Ruffmann son’s disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30(12):1591–601. C, Klein JC, Rumbold J, et al. Smartphone motor testing to distinguish 93. Hoehn M, Yahr M. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neu‑ idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder, controls, and PD. Neurology. rology. 1967;17(5):427–42. 2018;91(16):e1528–38. 94. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–9. 72. Lo C, Arora S, Baig F, Lawton MA, El Mouden C, Barber TR, Ruffmann 95. Fahn S, Oakes D, Shoulson I, Kieburtz K, Rudolph A, Lang A, Olanow CW, C, Klein JC, Brown P, Ben‑Shlomo Y, et al. Predicting motor, cogni‑ Tanner C, Marek K. Levodopa and the progression of Parkinson’s disease. tive & functional impairment in Parkinson’s. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(24):2498–508. 2019;6(8):1498–509. 96. Fothergill‑Misbah N, Moffatt S, Mwithiga H, Hampshire K, Walker R: 73. Martinez‑Martin P, Schrag A, Weintraub D, Rizos A, Rodriguez‑Blazquez C, The role of support groups in the management of Parkinson’s disease Chaudhuri KR. Group obotINMPS: Pilot Study of the International Parkin‑ in Kenya: Sociality, information and legitimacy. Global Public Health son and Movement Disorder Society‑sponsored Non‑motor Rating Scale 2021:1–11. (MDS‑NMS). Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2019;6(3):227–34. 97. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. United Kingdom: 74. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez‑Martin SAGE Publications; 2021. P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, et al. Movement Disorder Society‑sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS‑UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Publisher’s Note Mov Disord. 2008;23(15):2129–70. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub‑ 75. Martínez‑Martín P, Rodríguez‑Blázquez C, Forjaz MJ, de Pedro J. The lished maps and institutional affiliations. clinical impression of severity index for Parkinson’s disease: International validation study. Mov Disord. 2009;24(2):211–7. 76. Chaudhuri KR, Martinez‑Martin P, Brown RG, Sethi K, Stocchi F, Odin P, Ondo W, Abe K, Macphee G, Macmahon D, et al. The metric properties of a novel non‑motor symptoms scale for Parkinson’s disease: Results from an international pilot study. Mov Disord. 2007;22(13):1901–11. 77. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5. 78. Gray WK, Paddick S‑M, Kisoli A, Dotchin CL, Longdon AR, Chaote P, Samuel M, Jusabani AM, Walker RW. Development and validation of the identification and Intervention for Dementia in Elderly Africans (IDEA) study dementia screening instrument. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014;27(2):110–8. 79. Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Peto V, Greenhall R, Hyman N. The PDQ‑8: development and validation of a short‑form parkinson’s disease ques‑ tionnaire. Psychol Health. 1997;12(6):805–14. 80. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five‑level ver‑ sion of EQ‑5D (EQ‑5D‑5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36. 81. Stiasny‑Kolster K, Mayer G, Schäfer S, Möller JC, Heinzel‑Gutenbrunner M, Oertel WH. The REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire—A new diagnostic instrument. Mov Disord. 2007;22(16):2386–93. 82. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70. 83. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9. 84. Chaudhuri KR, Pal S, DiMarco A, Whately‑Smith C, Bridgman K, Mathew R, Pezzela FR, Forbes A, Högl B, Trenkwalder C. The Parkinson’s disease sleep scale: a new instrument for assessing sleep and nocturnal disability in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(6):629–35.