University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh IMPROVING THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE: DEALING WITH LARGE HETEROGENEOUS CLASSES BY VERA EKUWA MANSA ARlIlN A TIiESlS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS, UNIVEIc methods iDIIadofKlin& ... guide in tho absence of University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The heavy reliance on English textbooks in the secondary schools by both teachers and !lUdeaIsllllkesonebclic\i~ that if textbooks are carefully wrinen and careful instructions are provided for their use. the quality of written and spoken English of Ghanaian students will impro\'e. Even tboush many researchers have saidthis,specific guidelines for teaching have not been provided. It is this that the study bopes to provide. 1.4 Scope This study aims It investipling the EnaIish language situation in Senior Secondary Schools in Ghana. Teachers' qualification and background is looked ai, and teaching methods used in the classrooms are aiSCSsed. Finally, suggestioni for handling large mixed ability classes are made. Studies that have already been done on handJinglarge mixed ability claues in the context ofELT bave been reviewed. These include Slaven (1983). Scheibl (1984), Webb (1989), Villegas (1991), Hodfield (1992), Arends (1994). Prodromou (1995), Ur (1996), and Joyce and Weil (1996). The literature review shows the main pwpose of embarking upon the current itUdy. Primarydatacoll~cdisaJsoanalyied.ltCOlllpl'iscsthefollowinl: a) Claiiroominteractioo b) Structured and unstructured interviews with teachen and students c) Questionnaires d) Marked ....y o University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh SugcstionJ offmd in this study cover the followiq areas: 0) EffiocoiwJamioaforoll_iacluJ b) Useful ma&erialsIactivities for classroom te.china c) Sustaininai.ntemt d) Morutorin8s1udeot'sachievement Oata aDd Rnnu. Procedure A focus gro"" was UICd for the pwpOIe ofthil study. This WIS. science class and an Ida cl. . of the Tema Methodisc Day Secondary School. Tcrna Metbodist DIy Secondary School wu chosen for dtis case study. This school was chosmforsewralrcasons First, il represents majority of schools in Ghana in thai its itudentJ are admitted into the school from Junior Secondary Schools with average grades. Th;s school is DOl considered II one oftM gradc A Kbools in the country. Second, the cLus sizes of boIb etassa obIerved are .bove 40 P. .i 1s. which represent most largeclasletin~lCbools. ltlsthcrefon:likclythal. suggestions offcrcdin enthusiastic .boUllbe study and willingly offered assistance throughout the fnt term of the 1991199 academic year when tbe reaearch atarted. OocsecondyearJCicocccla$sudanartac:. ... werecbosenforthisstudy This was to ioVesfiptc the extent to wbich secmiatly homogeneous groups would exh.ibitsi8D'of~. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 1.6 Importance of Study This study is important in three main respects. First. it offers suggestions wtti<:b mil)' help teachers baDdJe large mixed ability classes effectively within the Limited time provided Cor the teaching o(the English language in schools. Second. this study reviews course materials and teachin, methods which shouJd be uaefW to eurricuJum planners, tex.tbook developers, teacher trainers and teachers. Finally, the study will be beneficial to rCiearchers in that it may provide a buis for further re§earch in the area and abo improve the Engliib language situation in Ghana. 1.7 Conclusion This study aims 81 creating awareness that in teaching large mixed ability classes, classroom activities will havc to be dcsiped to suit the specific nceds of all learners so that each member benefits from the leuons. Additionally, it will provide suggestions for teaching which could be included in a teachers' handbook. The study cornpriia five chapters. Chapter one is the leneral introduction; cblpter two reviews cxilting literature OIl handling mixed ability classes; chapter three presents the collection lOCi ....I yses of data: chapter four i •• discussion of the fmdings and implications of the study. Chapter five which concludes this study suggests ways ofbandling: large heterogeneous classes. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REV[[W APPROACHES IN LANGt:AGE TEARING, ISSUES IN TEACHI"IG 'I1lXED ABILITY CLASSES 2.1 IIItroduclioa Researchers who have done some work in the area of handling mixed ability classes seem to agree thalaU cJasses are made up of students who differ in • number oeways. Differences such as intelligence. cognitive atyle. socio·economic t.ck.g:rouDd. kDowledse of tile world, cultwal bKkground and gender would affect tbctc.chinaIDd1eam.ingprocess. Somcresearcbersbavetbereforeproposeddllt the lock-step approach, wbere the teacher stands in front of the class while all the studcoli move at the same pace, may not help the students to get the most out of lheeJaa. Sehcibl (1984). Hadfield (1992). Prodromou (1995), Woolfolk (1995~ Ioyoe mel Wei! (1996),_ Ur (1996) bel;'" that students con leom how to leam and respond 10 a number of teaching and leaminB environments which will help them acquire the much needed knowledge if teaching methock uaed by teachers in language cluarooms an: carefully planned. A number of activities and ways of band.lina mixed ability classes have therefore boeD sUlgatcd. These activities ensure !bit telcbcrs highlight similarities amcmg students instead of differences MMly re:IeaI'Cbers who look at waY' of handling mixed ability classes suggest University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh similar strategies for EFL situltioas. Tbia chapCer carefWly analyses suggestions offered. 2.2 Group Work Scbcibl (1984) suggests that group work is an obvious choice for mixed ability cIas.ses. This is because I nwtimwn number of pupils in a class are actively involved in the Icsson as thc)' occupy themselves with tasks. Similar views have been expressed by Arendt (1994), Prodromou (1995). Woolfolk (1995), Uld Ur (1996).Theser~bersdiscUiStbeadvantagesofgroupwork.Ur(I996:305) auerll that Learners are able to work cO-opel'atively to eoswe higher achievement, IDd peers teach and appreciate me another's effort According to research findinp. if each member of the group is rude to contribute to the group according to hislher ability, members are likely to learn quic:kJy from one anothcr'~ effort. Woolfolk (1995: 378) discUiSeS the need for each individual in a group to actively participate in tasks since aWng questioru; and attempting to explain issues 10 group members belp the individual to organise information. This, according to Webb (1989) and Kiag (1990), is an excellentleaming strategy since the more a studentprovidestboughtful explanations to oeher students, the more the explainer learns. Slaven (1913) also notes that learners' Khievemcnt is incrased when the IJOUP is rewarded hued on the average grades of the group members. In a rescarc:b on co-opentiw learning with heterogeneous groups and elements of competitioo and reward., Slaven and his associates developed a IysIem called University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ShMkItl T('QIfU _A ~ Divis/OIlS, or $TAD (Slaveo 1995), Tbc avenle test score~ from each iDdividual ' s previous work arc neorded. Tbc:a ItUdeots prepare for class quiz.:zes in their poups even tbousb students are made to lake quizzes individually. Baed 011. how each .member improves co hisI1ter individual averate score, each team member can cam one to three scores for the goup. Thus. only whe:i1 an iDdividuaJ improves on previous work does helshe cam a mark for Ihc group. AccordiD& \0 Woolfolk (l995), Ibis makes every student work h.n:I and avoidstbeprobknlofstudeoU' UDC:qUI.Ic:ontributioDto alfOUPploject. Even thous,b the STAD lDIIy teem a good way ofencouraaina members of a BfOUP to work bud \0 adUeve beaer results, courses organised for teachezJ awst provide guidelines for effective teachina otherwise the objective of this revision done in iP'oupJ will be throwo overboud, In another racarcb which investiptel the value of group work, Doughty and PieI (1986) compared. "'tather-rro..d" d ... and group won. on a problem solving task. The resean:b proved that, interactive behaviours sucb as comprebcnaioD ch«ks., ~clari6cation.requests, rcpair,etc.wmmore frcquentIyUledia groups with regard to informatiOllcxciwngc than the ""te.cher- In recc:ol timcsaroup work bas been ideatified as a useful way oflcaming in the classroom. UnfortuDlildy. DOt much has beca sUd about effective WI)'S of handling group work in large classes. Evea. tboup Prodromou (1995) states IbM the mac exitlcncc of group work wiD naf.1OIw the problem ir ancntion is not paid to what goa on in the group. DO detailed sugacstions are offered for secood University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh laniuap: teachers. Prodromou., tor example, sugge5ts community commuaicatioo thai CDCOuraps groups to interllCt in their first IlDgWlp while the teKher reformut.aa what bas been said ioto Englisb. However, be doe:. not provide ckUi*lguidcline5for domgctUsin theclaseroom. Ghanailftteacberswho baodle large mixed ability clape. wiU like to know where group work fits in the language curricu,hllD. 1bey will alia like to know bow much time must be spent on group work. if it should contribute positively to the kamiag process. nus lnfonnation will be beodicial to them because learners are usually constra ined by time and a 10ided .yUabUi. Current research in the area of group work does nol seem to address lbae peculiar needs of Ghanaian te.Kbers. It is this vacuwn that this projCC1 aeekaso 611 2.3 Indiyidual Leu.iDI Style Another suggestion that has been offered for handlina mixed ability c lasses effectively is the need for teKbers to be awan: of the leamina styles of students in the clNaroom. HUIIt (1970: 2) uys that. ..... the cloacr a teaching &trategy is tailored &0 Ihe learDer's coaoepWal &eve!. the IDOfc learning will take pIac:c." nil mw hu boa> ro;_ by RubUi (1987), A. ....' (1994), Books (1994) Prodnlmou (1995), Woolfolk (1995), U, (1996~ loyce ..d WcH.(1996). Teacbers areadvisedto.doptteachiaalt)'leswttitb suit individuaJDCCda, kamina style. and aptitude. Banks (1994:$) advocates III 'equity pedl8OIY,' wbich is a tcnn used for maIdUoa: tcacbiaB styles &0 studaU' learning styles in order to facilitau: acadcmi.c achievements of studcats from divenc bKkgrounds. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh _(1994) omd Prodromoo(I995) also __e st thII. varietyofactiv;u.,1OII teacbingmelhodllbouJd beuscd in class 10 enableeacb Jeamerto use st:rIIegies with which be Of she is comfortable. For example. while some learners do bettu when given the opportuaity to work on projects. others need to visuaJize coocepU bema laUIhI. If ~ben are COIlJCious of varied luming styles in the classroom, leaners are more likely to benefit &om the teacbina if an «Lettie approach " adopted. For 0""",,1e. Woolfolk (1995) provMlos • ".'80 of ways of accommodatinalcaminl styleJ. 10 • reading Jesson, for example, I wide ranae of activiuessur;batbe Uleofverbal rmterialJ, visual fIUItcrials,tapes rorlistenin8 and viewiDgas wcllas activities such as the Ule of projects could be provided at difftrenl reading lnell, This variety made available to learners will dcCmitcty offer each learnCf a chance to do somdhiog he1shc likes domg or scmething which falls in lin. with hislhctlltudy tcchnique. What makes thIe idea of varying lessons in e1ass more relevant is the ..- c:GIId......t by Naiman .. aI. (1978) I0Il Pickett (1971). Throuah classroom obser\Wioa and interviews. the raearch established lUI then: is ..-..n.ty '" die Iecboiq .... -"'yocl by different Ieam.,. whicb n,cds to be explomL In their IUl'Vcy.1camers reported thM they developed their L2 vocabulary in varied ways. Examp&es listed are: memorizing vocabulary lista. leamiDCwonis iocoaaert, pncticing vocabulary by puttinaworda into diffettnt structum in ooSerto driU tb.emIelvcs aDd reacJiq to reinforce vocabulary. Otbcn also .-epooud II1II tI>oy played games which iavolvod IhioItioa of words with the .- ending, and..,,-ing words to the"""lves. Areods (1994) sums IlUa ~ by University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh su.gestia, that 1eamiD& activitia must be designed to merge with a variety of INDtinlstyles, ie, visual. auditory, tactile, etc. Prodromou (1995) adds that in a mlxed ability elus,lcamen must be made teIpODaiblc for their own teaming. SiDc:c &be teac.her ~t see to the need. of every mcmbe.r in • class• • oonducive environment should be creaIed for 5tlf~ ckwIopcneat. ProdroIDOU (1995) sugesu that tell-access activities must be used in the classroom. This implies thai students should be encouraged to do iDdepeodcd -" Uuougb lb. .... ofmdepecdeol llUdy tocbmques, w!Uch ....b Ic them to wort OIl matcriab of their OWD choiec. In addition to thiS- students mllst DlOQitor Cbrir own progress as they buikl their grammar and vocabulary. Joyce aod Weil (1996) provide an example of an lndividuaJly PreiCribcd lastrudioaal programme (IPI) to support Ibis point. TbiJ ptOp'amme was deve}oped by the Leornins Resea.cl> and Dev. .......t c. .... of !he Univmity of Piasbwgb, m ~U.boratioo. with Baldwin WhitcbaU School District. IPI is designed to assist pupik 10 work II. tMir own pace, develop self..initiatioo aod self-dircction of leaming, whicb also CDCOUrase telf-evaluatioo.. The expe<;tat:ion is thIt iD a mixed ability class, activities oftbis nature may help all fNdeatI to paform well in cu. Ur(l996)also admits dtataUowiQaleamersadtoiccin tub tbeyhave totac:kle inclasslnaUJtetcff'ectivelcunina:. IDcleed ct.e idea or varyioa activities ill clua is crmial to baodIing mixed ability classes. However options available for Ghanaian tcachelll aod learners to choose froD' are limited. For e. ...m plc. maD)' schools do not have acceSll to audio visual aida and 50 rely mainlyoa textbook activitics. F\II1betmore if. tcacbet is University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh dealing with a large class., monitoring tbc progress of each student ioa systematic way is not III cuy task. Also, becauae lessons are examination oriented, teacberl as weU as learners need to work in a certain time frame. ThWl, students cannot have the luxury of choosing what they want to learn or deciding on bow mucb lime they wish to spend on their own projects. If students will benefit from SuggcRiODi offered, teachers need to be taughl ways of modifying these suggestions to meettbe needJ of Ghanaian students.1bis project hopes to asSiit tho GIwWan t ...h er in this....,ro. In_ attempt to JOIvc the problems faced by students in mixed ability classes, Prodromou (1995) and Ur (1996) propose that students work on both closed..-mded and open-ended. activities, which provide variety in such classes within the framework of one and the same leason. This proposal will be reviewed in the section below. 2.4 Closc ....E oded aad Open~E.dcd Activitics Prodromou and Ur classify most textbook exercises such as "~S/DO" questions, "Wh" questions, multiple choice. truclfalie questions. substitution drills, comprebcua,iouexercisea,ete. ucloiccHndcd. Cloled~endedexereises are homogenous in DIture aod only addretI the needs of a limited range of learners wbo have mastered the relevant laapqe. Leam.en at a lower level, according to these writers, may cUber QOI. respood to such questions or are likely to Jet answers wrong. They further claim tbaI: .dvlllced learners are abo neglected in that these .ctivities do not giYetbem.acbaDce to show what they can do with the language. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Open-eodcd activities, on the othcr band, take into cogni.zancc ditreteDUS .. Ieomioa sly1. ... well as proficieual expericnce and its possible inflUCDCe on lheirattitude lowards learninlEDglish. Knowing iNdc:ot's beck-FOund and taking advantage oftbat knowledge 10 improve lachina is crucial to the issue of handlina mixed ability CIUSC5. Even IbouP it may DOl be easy for teachen to haw: studmts describe leacbinl metbodl used in previous schools they attended, the)' should be aware of language teaching medtodolosies av.ilable IDd draw U1 web reSOW"CCS freely to help individual students learn the language in their preferred ways (Prodromou 1995). 2.6 A.ttihld~ orT~uhen Towards Learacrs Apart from mod.ifyiac tachint .chods to suit individual needs of learners in mixed ability tlassrooms. researchers advice teachers 10 be leIl5itive to the emotions of &he individuallcamus. who are diffcmd in a number of ways.. Arends (1994) and Woolfolk (1995) suggest thai raisiDi Ibe self- esleem of learners can help eveo the slow lamer Dieve gre&lcr success. Prodromou (J995) examines the role orlbe 1eKber and PlVpCIMliIlhat in order to be successful in a mixed ability du&, tbe teacher has to play the role of a friend. manaacr. counsellor, fKilit.lOr of learniq. reliabl. iDfOlllllllt on the laopaae, social worker IDd a model for students. Clifford (1990; 1991} also addatbatl tacbetmust be supportive, patient and must DOt embanus students whal tbcy make mistakes in clus. The issue of sexism is clitc:-..d by I number ofre.aearciacrs. p~ ArcbdI_ Joyce IDd WeiJ (1996) 'Iy tbat sexism shouJd be .,..."cd io teacJl:ia&. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ,.. _h as possible. podc<-freelao_ ohouklile used in clost ond sex roIeo, wltich reflect geoder bill in teachin& mMeriais, should be di£cussed in dass. Arendsideutifies(onnsofse)l;.bi.sincurricuJum~ria1s.Tbesearclinguistic bias, (where masculine terms are used to refer to all people) .tereotyping. invisibility (where women are either omitted or under represented in texts) and imbalance/unreality (el. rcpmenting a nuclear family as typical instead of a .ingle parent family). FrqmartMion is also seetl as another type of bias. Hcre, inf'onnalion about WOmtll as Ul1».lIy separated from the body of the main text. OftCQ tacbers wtcoruciously coDtribute to bia5u by payinl more attenlion '0 boys !boo girls (Sadl. ., and Sadk., 1990. CIDhnc<, McClellud and Saffo,d 1992). Indeed. neither teachers nor materials should make any studem feel le$S import_ in c\aai. Linn aod Hyde (I989:17) in t1teu meta-analyse. coaeluded that diffc~nces between bo)'l aDd prls were always small and so educatiolUll programs if ~fully pbnned could brin, out the best in both sexes. Arends also records that overall lQ score of males and femalei aft not MgnifiCMIly different on the Prodromou (1995) IdwDecs the argument that the welfa~ of each srudent mustbesouaht· Early fiDiIbers of tub rnustnotbealJowcd to intimidate slower students. They must be allowed to work on other tub while slower leamers are hclpedtoconsolidillcoldmatC1'ialwhilcsUlUlininlthcinICfestofthceotirec:lass. Ur sugests lhat compulsory and optional tasks should be assigned to ItUdeats so that tbe fast or more advanced students wjll .IWilY' have tasks to work on. This may casctbcpressurconeacblNdenl. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh F.-. __ studentocksround infomwtiOll may ..., belp the rcsarcber to lSIJc:u how appropriate the suggested metbods bciac ueed by teachers are. The examination of students' eua)'l abo University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.3 DacriptlveRese.rcb The delcriptive research melhod was used to examine the foHowin!: .) r extbooks and syUabus recommended by G.E.S. for senior secondorysobools. b) Claaroom iDtcnction and leamml process. furthermore. the main approaches for piherinl data for descriptive rescarc:h were uscd, and tIoey are: a) The cxamination and analysis of written texts and b) The direct obic:rvation method. lbeecmetbodaWC'l'evcry uscfUltooU forpioing an insight into English language tcacbins Md 1e:amin1 al the Senior Seeoodary School level. While syllabi, SSS English textbooks. examinen' reports and written usipunents were eX&mined for analysis. the direct observation method was uscd for investigating 3.3.1 ED.laden and Aaalysis .fWrittCD Tuts The whttllll texts wbich were dUdied for the purpoH of this rese.ch are the SSS syllabus, Core English textbooks, Examiners' reports aad Essays written by students. The cxurWlation of these materials helped the researcher to underaandwhatteacbersandlcarncrsareexpcctcdtodointheEnaJiihlauguaae dusrooms • weU • die ICaIe of EngliAb j;p the school. This bKkpound iDformItioIl may also help tbe researcher to _ how appropriate the suggested -boiaa-by-.. .... Tbe_ofSlUdeals' ....y sa\so University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.3 Descriptive Resean:b The descriptive researeh method was I..IIed to exanUnc the following: .) Tmbool.a:: ::J49 40 42 44 46 46 50 MEAN SCORE University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Qat ", -' ---- Figure 7 MEAN SCORE FOR ARTS AND SCIENCE STUDENTS seffNer: MTa "so i ARTS ~ __ u -~50 (;~(i ., iil ~iJ.~~· ; SCIENCE 1&&& 145 r- ' .~;.:~ 48 47 50 51 MEAN SCORE Figure 8 MEAN SCORE FOR MALES AND FEMALES Ot:NOER MEAN SCO.R.E FEfMLE ""'-E " MALE c:~,~ ]43 FEMALE ~~.- --;-lC :-::-';'~ - -4 149 ~' - - -- 40 42 44 46 48 50 I MEAN SCORE I University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ID the 7th JlDt', 2000, edition of 'Every Woman' broMlcut OIl the BBC World Service, it was observed IhIt female students in the U.K. arc, on the average, scoring higher grades in school now than teD years ago. 1b.is was attributed to the availability of opportUnities after completing their courses, which seemed to be motivating females to get to the top. This seems to reflect the situation in Ghana. Another flClOr, which may have given rise to females scoring heber grades is that molt male students admitted that they did not like reading and often spoke pidgin English outside the classroom. The arts students, by the natw'e of their cOur!e, happen to read more textbooks which seem to contain more authentic language which they may need to use in their day-la-day .2. ' T communication. 1ne arts atudcnts are also compelled to write more essays in their subject areas. Reading more and writing more, seems to give the arts students more opportunitylopractisc usmgthcEngiish language. The place where students grow up and stay for most part of their life aJso affects the English proficiency. When proficiency 5COfes were analyzed in terms of where students stay, it was found out that those who usually find themselves in the urban areas had ao average score of 49% and those in the semi-urban areas had 42%. Those in the runl areas Ud an average of 40%. (Sec Figure 9 on next page). The results of this survey may imply that if leachers are aware of the area students usually find themselves, they may adopt teaching &trategiet which will v,' beJpaJl students to forge ahead without Illowingtheir background to affect them nesatively. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh flOUR£1 AREA MEAN SCORE RURAL '" SEMI-URBAN .. URBAN .8 MEAN SCORE BY AREA WHERE STUDENT GREW UP i SEM-URBAN University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The studeftts may alJO be belped to learn independently while students from the rural areas mly be given opportunities to use the English language in a school environment. Such an environment is necessary since Kraft (1994), in a study conducted in Ghanaian schools, found that, Ghanaian children, particularly tboiCintberuralareas,haveonly 1% of the English language contact hours that a child growing up in the United States of AmeriCli might have. He said. this might make it extremely difficult for such GhanaIan students to master !.he English language. Looking at the results discussed in the preceding section, it can be concluded that the background of students may have a bearing on proficiency scores. Knowledge of the backgroWld of students is therefore necessary if the Englisblanguagcteac:bcr is 10 iucceed in satisfying the individual language needs of students. 4.2.5 Learniog Styles Subjects were interviewed to find out if they all preferred the tcacher ccntered lock-step approach (prodromou 1995) being used by their teachers to teach Engllsh.. Out of forty-six 5tUdents prescnt in the arts class at the time of the interview, only one uudeot said the lock-&tep approach made learning easy. Forty- five students however said they prefcned to study in • clus in WbKh lessons were taught in a variety of interesting ways. 'They added that they wouJd perhaps gain more from the a.oas if theIr leacher could rely ~ on the core Eoglish textbook and create interesttnl!: bsons by herself insIead of helpin. them to SO through the University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh book pilge by page. When asked iftbey bad Illy "interesting" ideas to offer, thirty- five membcn: of the class suggested group work because they enjoyed studying in groups outside class boun. Thirty members of the group also suggested that, for more difficult comprebe.oiion passages, the teaeber should extend the silent reading period instead of asking some students to read aloud. When ..k ed if the classroom en'monment was such that they could freely communicate in a relaxed atmosphere, twenty-fow members of the class said it was. They added that they were people who generally liked asking questions and .D o contributing to lively wstussioos. Six admitted that in order to save face. they would neitherconbibute out ofthelroWD wil1 nor ask questions even if they did not undcrsLlnd • &enon. Wh~ asked what they usually did to catch up with the rest of the class, they said that they normally asked friends to teach them when cwscs were over. Questions, similar to those posed in the arts class, were asked in the scienceclU5. Then: were forty-four itUdents present on the day of the interview. None of the studeou in the C!IW wanted a teacher-centered class even though twenty-tbreestudentssaidtbeywouJdstilloeedtbeitteacherinlhcbackgroWldto reassW'e them. In aU. thirty students admitted that they learnt by interacting with teachen and friends so would prefer a teaching method which enabled them to use the language in a ownber of ways including group work. The answers given by students during this interview clearly showed that studeolswcte, toiOmeexteot., aware of their preferred leaming s(ylesand wished that tcacben would respond to them. The responses aiwa by member$ oftbe: two University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh heterogeneous cl8Slel are interesting in that the focus of the science students seems to indicate that they prefer aD analytical approacb to leaming. Tbey mainly wanted to learn the language by asking a lot of questions, practising the language in groups and baving a teacher in the baCkgroWld to tell them when they were going wrong. Tbii respoue is interesting in the sense that this approach reflects the procedure in conducting science experiments. The arts stUdcnls, on the other band. stiU oeeded lheirteacher to control tbe class but wished that there was more variety in the mdhod ofteacbiDg adopted. The responses to the questionnaires and interviews seem to suggest that learners in the class differ in a number of ways. 'The differences do not only exist in the backgroWld of the learners but also in learning styles and proficiency levels. El.tent to Wbicb Teachers aDd Students May Be Affected By the HC'te rogeneous Nature of the Class 1bis section examines the extent to which learners. as well as teachers, may be affected and therefore respond to the heterogeneous "environmentn in which they find themselves. Owing the focus group di.icumon, students exprcs!I4:'d their feclinp. It is worthy to note that studtnta were williDg to express their views in the presenee oftbe teac:hers who asked iftbeycoukl sit in tbe dilcuuioo.. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 4.3.1 Attitude or Students Even though students admitted that the presence of their colleagues who did better in English offeted tbem a standard to strive at, tbey still couJd not face that challenge. This rude them feel rather frustrated because the attitude of their teacbersand teachinS methods used by their leachers did not meet the needs of the less proficient students, who formed the majority. (See Figwe 1000 next page). While some said their teachers were impatient with the wuker students, others said the teacher talked all the time and hardly paused for questions from those who .. did nol oodcntand the lessons. 'The less proficient students, most of whom were ! &om low economic backgrouod, said thai to save their face and to prevent their r. 11 class mates from laughing at them, they did not ask questions in class. These students said they felt 'd.iscriminated' ag.m~t since their teachers always paid anentiontotheproficienlleamers 4.3.2 AttihideorTeacbers In a separate dilCUUion with teachers, they admiRed thlt what the learners said conceming their style of teaching was true. The te.chers also expressed their frustn.tion about the situation. Fim. they admitted that they did not know how to handle such mixed ability classes, which seemed to pose problema to the learners They also said the recommended English lellibooks did not come with teacher's blDdbooks and this furtheraddcd to tbeir problems. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ·~. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh They added that weak Sludents, who were admitted to the first year class remained weak students in the final year and this obviously meant they were oot using the right teaching strategi«. This comment is interesting in the sense that the same concern has been noised by Tandoh (1987:112) in a l'C$Carch which looks at the Eng1ish language ofUnivenity of Ghana students. Tandoh concludes that the level of language skills among lirst year stuclcnts remain wx:hanged even after they have progressed to the final year, wbeo any improvement does occur, it is only minimaJaodoccUfSmanunpredictableWlY· .0 According to the teachers, about 70% of their class needed one kind of help I> or another to mabie them to perform better in class. However, the loaded syllabus, .:0 f : whicb they bad to complete in a short time. made it difficult for them to pause to ask questions during kuons. The ISSue of 'time' came up severa1 times during the di$C~ion. The teacben explained that the Ghana Education Service expeeted them to teach a minimum of twenty-eight.. forty-minute periods each week. At the mel of e.ach term. teachers were expected to band in grades for twelve marked assignments wbicb comprised clau work, project work, class assignment/tests and homework When all the English language teachers of the school were interviewed, most of them said thM they taugbt five claues with an average clais siu of forty- five students. Therefore, grading took much of their time and prevented them from thinking about strategies which could help their student,. It was diJcovercd during the discuuioo with the srudents that eight of the assig:nmtnt types, which were University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh given to them as eitbel' class or homework. were DOt a true reflection of their ability since they copied &om friends because they did no( understand the work. From the discuuion above, it is clear that teachers and students alike need belptocopewithtbesituation. Bothteachersaodltudentsrecognizethatthereisa gap belween the proficient and the less proficient srudent, which needs to be bridged.. There is therefore the need to come up with teaching strategies that will addreiS the necdi of large mixed ability claises. These strategies sbould also help teachers to use effcttively the short time available for language teaching. In additioo, assignmeuts must a1so be scco as useful tools inthc leaming proccss, and teachers need guidance in making sucb work interesting and useful, f ' To enable the researcher to have a first-hand information about the s.ituation that both the itUdenta and teacberi described. teaching was observed for one tenn and the textbook uaed wu evaluated. The findings 3re discussed below. 4.4 The Effectiveness of Teaching Methodi and Textbook This 5CCtioo describes and assesses the teaching methods used by both tcachers andevahwesthetextbookJusedintermsoftbeiuueofbeterogeneity 4.4.1 ClassroomObservation Both teachers either stood or aat iD 600t of the c1au andtausht lessons by following the textbook very cloeely. 10 faI;t they went through tbe book &om one ,. ,I University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh page to another. The teachers usually asked a srudent to read relevant portions of the book to the clus I:Dd e:xplalned points made. The blackboard, which is a usefuJ tool in the clusroom for varying 8Ctivities as well as getting students to actively participate in class. was mainly used during grammar tessOOJ to explain some grammar points. In the aru class, for example, the teacher seldom wrote OQ the blackboard. 1'bismay place "'visual people" at a disadvantage. Such people like to iet:thelaoguagewrittc:odownforanaIysis. Group work was Dot organized for students. This limited active .. involvement by students. For example. most of the questions wed during the .,~. period of observation were teacher initiated. Thus cooperative learning. student r directed learning, and smaIl group interaction were not encouraged. Questions mostly came from tbe teechen and were usually answered by students who volunteered to do 10. Some students therefore did not actively participate in lessoruthroughouttbeperiodofobterVltioo. Some aspecIS of the English syUabus received more attention than others. A great deal of time was spent on the teaching of granunar and rt'ading comprehension. No time was ipCnt on speech work and very little attent ion was given to writing activities. The teachen, during an interview, said that much Ittention was not paid to speech work. because they bad very little time to cover ~ the grammar and reading comprehension sections of their textbook which was rather extensive. Perhaps ifteacbers adapt a more integrative approach to the teaching of English in the clas.sroom by paying equal attention to aU components of the Ianguaae.,they may cater for the varied DeeCk and interest ofth; students. . I ~'" ~ University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh They will abo help students to see the link between the varied aspects of the Englishlaaguoge. Since both leacbers strictJy adhercd to the textbook. there was very linle differente in the leaching method they used. During grammar lessons. the teachers explained the grammar points to the class. and students were asked questiom based on what had been taught as well as on the previous lesson. The milting thing about these grammar Ieuom wall that it seemed that students always bad problems answering questions baed on previous granunar leiSOllS taught. Teachers verbally expreued their disappointment v.rhen students could not. for example. tell what a clause ..... as. Grammar was taught in a very traditional way, so a lot of attention was paid to the ruJes of grammar Owing comprehell$ion leuont students who could read well were asked to read aloud after which the questions in the course books were answered orally. For their homework, students were alto liked to answer some of the questions in writing. Again. during these lessons it was observed that only particular siudents VOIWlleered 10 answer questions while the rest of the students ut down and Hstened. Having disawed WNlt happened in the classes observed. this work will now examine the contents of the textbook., since it teemI to play a key role in the tcacbinlaodlearninlProcesS. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 4.4.2 The Senior Secondary Core Enpisb Textbook The Curriculum Research and Developmeot Division (CRDO) and some examinen of the West AfrK:ao Examination Council prepared the syUabus on wbicbtbetextbookiJbIIed. ACCOfding to the autbors, a necdsanalysis was conducted and the results, which appear on the first page of the syllabus, form the objective of the Senior Secondary Core EDglisb progranune, whK:b every student is expected to study. The authors hope tbatthe textbook would: .. > Remedy the deficiencies in the Senior Secondary School products' conunWlicativecompeteoce; Reinforce aDd develop further those language skills and competencies wbicb were acquired at tbe Junior Secoodary School level; Genemc in studentaa love for ceading for enjoyment. 4. Revi5e students' level of proficiency in English usage to enable them to Wlderstand what they hear and read and to conununicate ably with OlhCT UlCl&ofEngllih; Prepce them 10 be able to function effectively either i) on their own or ii) iDoffic:eslDdotbcrworklituatioasorili)intertiaryinititutions; Enable all products of the Senior Secondary School to have access to the accumulated knowledge of their ch05eD fielda and allO to facilitate their sharing and be:nefitiofsuchknowledge withotbcn. (1991:1) University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CRDO propoied that the textbook should include activities that help studeoU to describe upetts of Ghanaian cWtural practice in appropriate ways to improve studePts' spoken Eoglish. English literature is introduced in the textbook to generate in ItUdcnts a love of reading for enjoyment and to give tbem theopportunilY to see language in use. 4.4.2.ICooteat The textbook U5CS an integrated approach. A unit may therefore contain •) lessons in reading comprehension.. vOCIbuJuy. language study (which is mainly grammar but sometimes discunes appropriate use of language for writing activities). speecb work, note taking. composition writing and literature. To perhaps prevent monotony, each unit of the course does not follow one particular pattern of sequence. For example. while Unit One starU with "language study" , Unit Two starts with reading and unit six swtI with ''writing''. Books 2 oflbe Senior Secondary SchoQI Enllish textbook which was used in both classes observed contains activities that have been written or selected for Iti their functional and inlerest value. Relevant material hued on the Ghanaian situatioo andcultwe is familiartoleameriaadtbcrcfore creates the opporturutyto UIC authentic language. For example the book has pusasa on health care, ~ foott.ll, MMlotberday-to-day activities. It ilevident from the selected passages tlW tbc aUlbors of the book tried to select somepassage5 to swt thc backgrounds oflcemen. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Even though the activitiell provided in the textbook might help students to actucveCOOUllW1icativeskiUs.tbey are ootenough. There are eertain aspects of tbc book which need to be carefully looked at. and the5e are discussed below. The uneven spread of topics in the rndividuaJ unitll may reveaJ that some topics receive very little attention. An examination of the textbook used revealed thattbere u; only ooe guided conversation activity, two note-taking activities, six compositioo writing exercises., five selections OD literatw'e, and eight speech work activities. Ontheotberhand,twentyrudingactivitie5bavebeenpresented,while twenty-five activities have been devoted to language study, mainly grammar. If teachers are to strictly follow thebook,then this is a cause for worry. Even though a textbook may emphasize certain aspects of English over others, teachen mual learn to constantly find out what students need most by asking them to say wblt thcy really have problems with. Tberesponse received dwing the interview showed that students needed more writing activities Even. though. the developers of the syllabus emphasize the need to conunWlicate, writing activities and conversation practice exercises are given very I~ • little attention. Secoodly, the textbook encourages a teacher-eentered approach. whicb gives very little opportunity for studcnta to inter3ct in groups. Points are usually explained afterwhidt studenta are asked to aDJWer questions. Therefore leamers with different learning stylet are not given the chance to work on a variety of activities. ControLled grammar practice features significantly in the textbooks. Again this may have to be carcfully looked ataincerec:cat researcb.seems to agree with University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Ellis (1990:192) tMt 'controlled practice appears to have little long term etr~t on accuracy with wbieb new Sb'UCt\UCs are performed'. Even though controlled practice is good. too much of it does not help the learner to experiment with the language. The hold on the learners and the teachers by the writers of the textbook seems to be too rigid. For example, specific instructions. as opposed to guidelines, are sometimes given to show how the clas sbould be managed. On page 139 of Book 2 for example. the textbook writCl'S give students the following instructions: Draw a line down the middle of one page of your exercise book, &0 that the page is divided anto two sections ... What you are domg an thiii exercise is leaming how to group the poiDtsthat beloogtogethcr This assumes that students could not arrive at the same conclusion by using their own preferred learning styles. Leamen should be left to make discoveries for themselves because there are several learners who learn bener that way. Rutherford and Sbarwood-Smith (1988) assert tbat the role of the classroom and of teaching materials is to aid the learner to make efficient use of the resources in order 10 facilitate sclf-discovery. Tomlinson (1994), Bolitho and TomliDloo (1995) and Prodromou (1995) hive expreued similar views. Different leamen have differmt learning styles 10 teacben must ensure that just as thi! style of teaching is sWlable for those who are dependent learnen, students who are more independent and want to learn from that own experience should have their needs catered (or al oDC time or tbc other. This Unplies that language University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh inicrudioa. as much as pouible, has to be based OIl a variety of cognitive styles (Lanen-Fm:mao and Long 1991) and teachers must be helped to vary their teaching style by drawing 00 information from leamer's background. A look at the book helps DOe to see why some students are dissatisfied with the clasaroom activities. The mlterW. do not offer the learners the much- needed variety. For example, students could be encouraged to do some pair and group work. Independent learning as well as cooperative leaming should be encowaged ill clau $0 that the learning proce$S will be more effective. AdditionaUy, it i. imporlaDt that learners are given the opportunity to interact for KVeI8.I raaons. If learners are given the opportuDity to use the target language in several ways, they will be helped to chec.k the effectiveness of their internal bypotbeaes especiaUy if activities encoucagc them 10 use language slightly above their aamm proficiency (Swain 1985). Sharwood-Smith (1981) also adds that communicative interaction among students provide opportunities for leamers to pick up language from the DeW input generated by students themselves while learners output becomes an lnf'ormaUve source of input. Knowledge of theories such as theie helps one to undeI'5tand wbal students miss when cooperative learning ianot encouraged inclau. lntbe final chapter of this work, tasks based on tbe.etbeories will besugested rorcluaroomuse. While Hadfield (1992) ODd Ur (1996) offer leache" practicol guidelines on bow to teach mixed ability groups in their English langtllge textbooks, GbaDai.811 teachers have been left alone in this matter which CODCcms them. If all GbaDaian teachers were trained in ELT methods and therefore had lOme University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh t.ckgrouod lmow1edse on bow to bindle such classes. and if there were teacher handbooks and supplementary instruetional materials. then the currmt textbook would be considered adequate. However. since many of the teachers are not experU in ELT , it ii crucial for them to be assisted in handling such classes effectively. Tbc textbooks thai they are expected to use should provide such help. 4.5 Coad.sioa 1ltis chapter :5OuJht to examine the naMe of heterogeneity in two-second year claues oftbe Tema Melhodist Day Secondary School. By means of questioonairu, interviews and classroom observation, the srudy revealed thai the classes were made up of mixed Ibility groups of learners, whose beckground SC'emed to have something to do with their proficiency levels Knowledge of this should help the teacher to provide faci lities which enhance stuOeDtJ' communicative skills in the classroom. Again the interviews revcaJcd thltstudeots'leamingstylesandneedswerenotbewgcateredforandthatcouJd be: one oftbe causes for the poor performanc.c in EogiiJh. FiDaUy. a look at textbooks and teaching methods adopted by the teachers revealed a lack of variety in c1aiiroom activities, md of effeaive methods of assessing studenu' work. If teachers orpnizcd feedbliek seuiooa, tome of the frustration experienced by the leamen aDd teecbers could be eliminated. This calli for a learner-untered at.mospbere in spite of the number of students in each clan and the short lime within wlucbteacben: are supposed to complete tbcsyllabus. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh lndeeda lookattbeteacbingtbatweot on in both classes revealed certain lapses which Deed to be addressed if students should be helped to communicate effectively in English. Students must be assisud to be more open. and to express their needitoteacbets. In the 6aaJ chapter of this study, suggestions wiU be offered to help te8cher.; to bandJe more effectively large heterogeneous classes in Ghana. "': University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER FIVE WAYS OF DEALING WITH LARGE HETEROGENEOUS CLASSES 5.1 INTRODUCTION Rinvoluncri (1986), who has studied mixed ability cJasiCS. bas ope importaDt thing to &iy about them. He says the idea of teaching unitary lessons is odd and eluteS aboukI be considered as having separate individua1s and not a group. This is to ..y thIl any teacher who does not vary his or her teaching style is not doing the rigbttbing. Brown (1987:95) reiterates this point by saying that '"The teacher needs to recognize and lUlderstand a multiplicity of cognitive variables active in the second language process and to make appropriate judgements about individual learners, meeting them where they are and providing them with the best possible opportunities for learning". I The assertions made by both Rinvohmcri and Brown above seem to 'J suggest that if allltudeDts in large heterogeneous classrooms should benefit from their English lessons, and be able to comnllmica.te more effectively, then teachers must plan a variety of appropriate lessons 10 meet the needs of learners. This chapter therefore looks at how teachers caa vary cla.uroom activities to suit the needs of learners in theie mixed ability CIUiCl. Reeommeodatiooa for the improvement of the teaching and learning situation io the SSS classes wiD be done in the: light of the following limitations identified. CalibreofTcochas University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh a) The teacher of the arts class investigated is • graduate teacber who read Frcoeh and specialized in the teaching ofFreoch. b) The teacher of the science class is a graduate of the University of Science and TecbookPgy, wbo read Eoglish and French at the wUversity level but bas DO bKkground in Educ:ation. 2) Textbooks a) Hmdbooks for teachers. which &bauJd go with the recommended textbooks forthecowse, are not available. b) No provision bas been made in the textbook for low achievers or high achiC'VC1"5. 1be books have: been written for learners who can learn at the c) Lack of SupplemenlAl)' readers and teaching equipmenl 3) Recommendations by GES a) Syllabus: Tune for the compLetion of the heavily loaded sylblbus is too abort. b) Work Load: GES insists that teechers tcaeb 8 minimum of twenty-eight periods per week. Teacben hlDdJe five classes with an average of forty- five JtUdmts. Thus the miDimum number or students each teacher 1eac:hes is two buodrt:d and twenty-two. Again, tbe.ae atudcnta are to present al least. twelve Il$.liignments for matking and recordina for continuolU University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh assessment. This adds up to at least, a total of 2.475 scripts for each teacher for each term. In spite oftbese issues raised. the teacher in the Ghanaian secondary school must be helped to teach leamen in the short teaching time available. The teachers hive to Idopl.mthods which will keep their learners motivated while ensuringlhat all leamers in the cJass are taugbt effectively, in spite oftbeirvaried beckgrolmd. Suggestions offered in thii chapter include the use of the following: A culturelbackaroUDd lCDiitive pedagogy. 2} Effective cta.oom lDtetaction. 3) Texbing methods and nutcrials to mit the needs ofleamers 4) Gtoup-work ill lap heth':' a) Very often b) Often c) Sometimes d) Ranolye) Neve< As a student how often do you listen 10 lUdiolTV news in English? a) Very often b) Oftm c} Sometimes d) Rottlye) As • student bow often do you attend seminan? a) Vtryoften b) Often c)Sometime.s d) Ranolye) As a studmt how often do you Iisac-n 10 public IClcturesltalks? a) Very oftm b) Often c) Sometimes d) Rarely e) Never As a student how often do you read EoaJish new.papers? .) Very often b) Often c) Sometimes d) Rardye) Never University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh As a student bow oftc:a do you read magazines written Ul.ED,g.liJb? a)Veryoftea b) Often c:) Sometimes d) Rarely e) Never As a student bow often do you read English novels? a) Very often b) Often e) Sometimes d) Rare1yo) Never 10. As altudcnt bow ofteo do you read reoommmdcd textbooks/journals? a) Very ofteo b) Oftco c) Sometimes d) Raelye) Never 11 . As a student bow oftea do you use books not reconunended? a) Very often b) Often e) Sometimes d) Ran:lye) N. ... As a Itudeot bow often do you usc the dktionary'? a) V~often b) Often c)Sometimes d) Rarely e) Never 13. As a studcot bow oftm do you we the eoc:yelopedia? .) Very oftee b) Oftee 0) Somelimu d) Ronlye) Never As a studca: bow often do you wme e&a)'l? 0) Veryoftee b) Oft .. o)Somdim. . d) Ran:lye) IS. As a SNdent howof!:en do you write reporu? a) V""often b) Often c)Sometimel d)Rarely e)Never University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh .) Vny oftea b) Often c) Sometimes d)Rarely e)Never 16. As a student bowoftc:o do you give talks? .) Very OftCll b) Often c) Sometimes d) Rarolye) Never 17. Asa student how often do you deliver oral reports? a) Very often b) Often c) Sometimes d) Rarely e) Never 18. As a student bow often do you speak English? .) Very often b) Often c) Sometimes d) Rarolye) Never 19. As. student how often do you speak Pidgin English? a) Very often b) ORm c} SometirTl¢S d) IWely 0) 20. AsaJtudentbowoftendoyouspeakyow-1ocallanguaae(s)? a) Vcryoftco b) Often c)Sometimes d) Rarely e) As altUde:nt bow often do you participlle in group diaclWions? a) Vnyoft.. b) Ofteo e)Sometirnes d) Rarolye) Neve< SEC-nON TltK.· ..· How much EngIidt have you learnt from the foUowi.na: University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Father.) Vcrymucb b) Much c) Not much d) Not very much e) Nothing Mother.) Verymucb b) Much c) Not much d) Not wry much e) Nothing Brothcr. Sistenandrclatives .) Vr:rymuch b) Much c)Notmuch d) Notverymuch e) Nothing Tcabcr/I...ecturen .) Vetymuch b) Mucb c) Not much d) Not very mucb e) Nothing Textbooks a) Vuymucb b) Much c)Notmuch d) Not~rymuch e) Nothing Nove" a) Very much b) Much c)Notmuc:h d) Nocvcrymuch e) Nothing Newspopcn .)Very much b) Much c)NOImuch d) Not vr:ry much e) Nothing Map.zinea a) Vcrymuch b) Much c) Not much d) Notvcrymuth e) Nothing Televisiona} Verymuch b) Much c)Notmuch d) Notvcrymuc.h e) Nothiag 10. R.aWo Very much b) Muob ' University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Which compoocnl of English is emphasized? Which will you rather empbaslze and why? Do you think all students have the same language needs? Explain your How do you deal with this? What are some of your concerns? What are some of the challenges you face in your clas.? Do you think you have been able to help liiome students in your class who are not very proficieot? How? Interview Guide for Students' Interview (FOCUS GROUP) Do you think assludents learning Enalilh as aseeond language youh.ve pined a lot to communicate with? WhIt other thinga would you bave liked the coW'Se to teach? Coas.ideriDathe larp cJ.auesyou beJona: to. do you think your language oeedaaremctuindiv,dua1J? How would. you like your '-eben to cLtal with thil? WhIt are some of your problema (u ianau-ze learners)? A ~ of peop~ compl.aiD tbM studeDcs of loday have seriow lanauaae problems. 00 you think tbiI is true? If so, what in your opinion is the reasoa. for this.d bow do you think your teachers can solve the problem? University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Even though you belong to the same class. do you recognize !hit SOIm madents in yourctass speak and write better Englisb than others? How do yoofeel abouttbis? How well do you think your teacher handles the situation? AnYIUBlestions? How have the listening, reading. writing and speaking lessons (input) affec:tedyourwriting(output). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh A TF.ACHING GUIDE FOR THF. SSS 2 TEACHt:RS I:\; I Af{G~ HF.TF.ROGENEOUS CLASSES. (COMPR":HF.~SION WRITING LlSTENINGISPF.AKlI'iG GRAMMAR F.XTENDEU "ND (INDIVIDUALIZED ACTIVITIES> Recommended Typeofstudent(l) Note for fhe Tucher Reading Comprebension Acth:ities(QuntioDS} 1) Copy01Jlpartofa Nocveryproficiem, ForstulknlsWlthlimilN slowleamer scoteoceand ......nlin*,skllts. I varic1yof cornpieteilinyour Ippfo.cbatnl), be used 10 own wonts familillTiuthnnwiththe kinds orllr\lCtUr'e't uscrul for 2) Writeoutsentencei in logical order ==~S~~~I"f" w lbeir (5eQuencing) l«ofllmcndod~1bIIy heJp.{Wnlirc;lIIlrMniD 3) Auwer questions in taJdullyconlfollt-d )'OUl own words. cOndjhOf'l~' 1) __1 110 MDooproficieatlllUden' ProvideadditionaJ wboiaalJo .. euly ptOYideadditional tasks,'extendedactivlty. finishaWoa kMonabavcbeenuscd '-. in meMin&ful context. b)A40dnwthe~ atteGtioatoperq:n.ph structuro. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Type ofStudul(S) Recommended Writinc Nott for tbe Teacbtr Activity (Pre--writiD&) Not very pro6cicoL. Based 00 tbe fact that slowk:arner prior experience or koowiedgeofasubjeci giveieatnenconfidence andbelpthemlo perform better. provide experieooetbrough sharinaofideas in class. 'The euay topics may be diiocUi$Od and outIine.s maybewrinenm groups. Provide more tbanone More proficient student questioa baed on topic wboisalsoanearly soatudent chooses a finisher moredemaodingonesif they wish. A variety of essay topicalque.ilioosmuslbe A discussion ofaU provided. Students topica will expose all sboWdbe giveo the ttudeniJ to experiences Mixed ability clUi with optiootocbootcwhicb tbeybove_hadlll otudeuIswitbvoriod tbeywaottodealwitb.. opportulUtylO le:am.ingstylcs However, aU topic:t musl experience. bed.dl;uqedioclus TimestlvLTS .... ~io;.~~ ·~d~;~ outliDcalpLonoC ....y C-opportwUtylOdo tpakinaIlisteninahere University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Typeo(StudeDt(s) R«Gaameoded WritiO& Note for the Te.cber Activity (Writiog) Notveryproficienl. Student to be 1) Group work is wefuJ slowlcarocr. And encouraged through for bclpina studco.IS to Mixed ability class with group work to learn bow us~ each other to write studmtswithvaried towntcpartsofbislber portions afanesuy. learnin<ylu essay. Here. Mkas are Part skills may be taught cxchangcdforplanning and in pairs oraroups thc essays as weU. studentscanbc encowaged to write eilhertbe introduction or coocluaioooftbeir eua~. More proficient student MoreproficicnlltUdeots Sometimes it will be can be asked aet as useful to ask some of who is also an early 10 finisher groupsecretarics. They the more proficient mayalsoassislmpeel students to tell the clau cditmg wbat tbey usually do to achieve good results. Pcer_hing may be doncoutsidcclassboun and diJcuIaioo ofwbat learners have eome up with may bcdisc:ussed in class University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Types ofStudeat(s) R«ommeDded Writiug Note for tbe Teacber Activity (Editing) Nocverypro6cieDt. a) Teacber may ask slowleamer. studcntsloeditcssays in group• . More proficieot student who is also. early b)lndividualessays finisher marked by teacher must notjUltbavegeneraJized Mixed ability class with commmts. Specific $Ndentswitbvaried guidelines to help leamingltyles. students improve or writebcttereuayamUlt be provided 00 separate sheets of paper . .. ............................ TimeSflVer$ Pusing such comments may seem a wasleof lime but will eventually save a lot of time since students will begin to work on their problems identified. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Recommended Nole for tbeTeacber Type ofStudeat(.) Listelling/Speaking Activities NOC""'YP""-' Learners must be given As students do group sIowleamer. the opportunity to listen diSC:UiSioDS,tcacbcr to more proficient class mU5t iililY b) Group work will (Convc:yingones c:ncourageopiniongap messageman tasks. appropriate way). Studentssbould exchange ideas iD b)Qyj!y groups (penonsabilityto tmderstaDdthemesu.ge I Moreproficientstudenl or be understood. wboi.a1aoanearly finisher I Mixcdabilityclauwilh c)~ studentJwitbvaried ·Examplesusc:dmuslbe (What ii appropriate in I leamingstyles draWDfrombockgrouod one SituatiOD may not be ofstudmts appropri.atein anotber- Grammar MOl must not I betaugbtinilolatioobut cootextJlDUIlbccratcd lohelp_. I I I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - I University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Recommended Note for the Teacher T)'pes ofStudcDt(s) Qn:rnmar Activities (For aJlSlUdeOU) Not very proficient, Step 1: ~ slow leamer. Students listen to _model (i .e . examples provided WBttstrueturein context) in a short dialogue or short story S!ml.; More proficient INdent Isolate item and explain who is also an carly bowtbcyfunction, what finisher. tbey mcao and rules that govern them (use Lr backgroundwbere appropriate) S!mJ; Praetice-Letleamers show understanding by Mixed ability class with Students wotk out how produc:iJ1gexamples students with varied the gramnw- works through drills· learning styles. (Joodforanalytic transfonnations, gap students.) 6iHngexemsesetc. TCKbcr providea model IDdstudents.,....;de ·aimatlJ1ldually language in cootroUcd allowina leamcrs to gain COIdeXtsi.e. JlP611ing. a measure of autonomy tranJf~ctc. as arammar is leant - crute sbort ICIJtmteS - write tbon paragrapb University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh TypeorStudmt(s) Rccommeoded Note for the THcher Grammar Activities Not very proficient, Grammarlessoo Use pait and group- slow leamer. worktoprac:ticetarget ruueture. -Give leamers ti.me to tbink after structure bas been taught. Morepro6cicntstudent -Provide blackboard wboisalJoaoearly work for leamers who finisber. necdtoaeethcstructure - Providewritten exercises for thole who need practice Mixed ability class with 5tUdentswitbvaried • Help leamm produce learning 5tyles. corrcctanswersby pcovidingappropriare oneo. luoc:savers. -Donot1eavethem alone to make mistakes. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh TypeofStude.at(s) Rttommtoded NoleforlbeTucber Edendtdllndividua- liudActivitirs Not very proficient. Pro\·iden::adersforClch slowleamu level. - Primarysebool Each students mould be reaciers,oew.papcrs. eocounged to read the mlpzWCI. a variety of Morc proficieat student materials available. Ens1ishlanguage who is also an early These may help 10 te)(tbooksmay bc finisher. improve thcir work displlyedforstUdeotsto choose from, Teachcrmayuseone Mixed ability class with of the free period. studcntswithvaried 00 school timetable learning styles. to answer individual queitionsandattend to individual needs (II i. likely that the more analytical seience.tudcntswill like to work on their own. But encourage them to tlilk). Time savers. Studemsmustbe eDCOIJI'I&CCltomooitor theiJownpropaaond diSCUllfurtbotriuues wi1h_. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh TypeofStudeDt(.) Rero.muded ReadiDg Note/or the Tescher Activity. NotW!ryp'ojic;wnt.s/ow Read an mterestin& sectioo. of boob or newspaper Jearner. frOlllsemi-urbon to increase knowledge ofthc world' of students. orruro/bockgrollltd Thismay mcrcascthcirdesirctorccordontncir No radios tests should be given. Reading shouJd be a plca.surab&e activity. Moreproficilnlstudtnt Providcbooks fordiffercnt levels. who is aLso 011 eor/y finisher Mu.ed abiJJIy doss, ProvideavarittyofgcmCi. All literature have ,twkltU with lIOI'Jed apceiftC cooventiou aDd uniquc styles. ThUlODCC /earning$tylu. uadenIOodlhrouabrepcated....,ins.studcauwili bo IbIc to dUcua""'-iDS f_ .ftho boob Ibcy ........... Thoywililisobeexpooedtowoys of'M"itiDaDewtpaperartidetete. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Type ofStudcot(.) Reall:llmeDdrd Rudiog NO(~JOT(h~ Teachu Activity. NOI very !"ofici.rU. slow Read an interesting section of boob or newspaper learneT• ./rOtrf$."'i-urooli to lncrease knowledge of the world' of students. OI'ruTolbockgrovnd 1bis may increase their desire to record on their No reading tests sbould bc given. Reading sbouJd bc I pleasurable ICtivity. More profideni $tuMnf Provide books fordiffemJl levels. who is QUO an .arly jillUMT MvcedClbilltyclass, Provide a varictyofgenres. All litcraturehave $n.MnIS wlJh varJed lpetific convCllliOOJ and wUquc ayles. TIna ODCC I.aming stylu. uodenIoodlhrouab~read;"g.studculswill be able to w.a. iateresting features ofthc books tbeyuverad. Tbeywill allobeexpotedtoways ofwritinaoCWlpaperarticletetc. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh TypeofStudaII(l) Recommeodltion Reading Not. for Ih~ T~DCMr Activity. NOIlAef)lprofic"nI. siow/~ar1tlr.frOlfl lfstudents who Mite better Eoglisbcame from a semi-W'banor rurQ/ 'reading bockgrouod' then, it will be .... fiII to bockground encourage alileamers to read interestio, books lXUt:d at their own level. They may be encouraaed; to borrow these books and wnte summaries. At least. once in 2 weeks.slUdentsmuslbeem;ollnlgedlositinpoups while reading. Teacher may then discuss reading flluJtl and how to read more eft'ectively with students Moreprojicienl As students, discuss boob they have read, teach them shldenl who isQ/so coDveotionsoftheaenresi.e.laoaualc,cbaractertypes aneariyjinishtr and character development. Also, issues on plot. setting, dialogue. mood etc. may be discussed. Mixtd abill/y class. stwdentrwllhvarW leartfi"lsty/n HelpiolltUdcoll to fonn healthy reading habits win help them commoo.icate better in the EngJUbI_ge, University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh TypeofStudmt(s) Reco[IllDCOdation Reading Not, lor (M T,och.r Activity. NO/W'I'}'p'ojidcnl. slowlHlT7J6l',frOlf'l [f students who write better Engliah came &om a s«ml·UTbotrOl'rwaJ ·readiD&bockground·thcn. it will be .... fuJ to backgrtnmd encourage an learners to read interestiDa books J)tgged at thClf own level. They may be encouraged 10 borrow these books and write summaries. AI least,oncein2 weeks. sludents must be encouraged to sit m groups while reading. Teac.hermaythendiscussreadingflults and bow to read mon: effectively with students. MoreprojicietJI As students, discuss books they have rcad. tetch them studetJIwho isQlso conventionsofthcgenrcsi.e.languaae.eballctertypcs tlIJ.arly/inisher and character development. Also, issues on plot. setting,diaJogue, mood etc. may be discussed. Mixed ability class. ltudntaw learning ,fiylhi.w, ried Helping students 10 fonn htalthy readtngbabitswHlhelplhem conununicate better in lhe English language University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh BIBLIOGRAPHY Adam, N. (1997). Problems of Language Skills in Ghani', Eduatioo System: A NatiooaI Crisis in Literacy. Work.ing Pop"S in Lanpoge Teoclring 1. .4 -11 Lcgoo: Laaguage Ccotre Addae-Mensah. I .. l .S. Djangmah and C.O. Agbenyep. (1973). Family /JDckground and EdJlcatiottal Opportunities In GItana. Accra: GhanI Unive:rsitiesPreis. Adika. G.S.K. aDd G. Owuw-Sdcyere (1997). Standards of EnaJisb in the University of Ghana and a Proposal for Departmenl Based Writing Programmes. Working Papvs lit lAnguage Teaching 1,1-3 l.egoo: laDguageCeDtre. Allen, 1.P.B., M. FrOhlich, mel N. SP*f.I (1984). The Communicative Orientation of Language TCKbing: An Obeenoation Scheme. In Huldscombe. J., R Ore.m aod B. Taylor. (Eds.): On TESOL '83: The Qwsflon of Control. WaihiP&U>P. D.C, lESOL 231-252 AUwrigbt. D. (1984). The lmporta.ace oflatetaction in Classroom Language LcamiD&-AppI;.dLinguilricsS.IS6--171. A.rmda., Rot. (1994). uorninlto Teach. New York: McGraw-Hili Assimeng. M. (1911). $QciaJ Strucn,u o/Ghana: A Study in Persulence and CJwJnge. Accra: Ghana PublWling. BanJu, lA. (1994). Mwllielhmc &iauaJlon 'TJt,ory IIItd Prtlt:ti~. BOlton: Allyn University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Benoett, C.l. (1995). COMjNeMnsive Mu/licuJllU'al Education: TMory - Practice. BoItoO: Allyn and 8acon. Bialystok. E.M .• Frolich, and 1. Howard. (1979). Shltllu on s..COItd lo:npttge uornil« PrOCUIU, and FJUtCIIoN. Unpublished Report. Toronto: Ontario InstiruteforStudiesinEducation Bolitho. R. and B. Tomlinson. (1995). Discover English. Oxford: Heinemann Brown, H.D. (1987). Principles 0/ Language LIQI'ni1Jg and Teaching. Englewood Cli1fs.Nl:Prentice--HaII. Brwnfit. CJ. (1980). Problems mtd Princlp/u in E1t,luh Teaching. Oxford: Petprnon. Clifford. M.M. (1990). Students need Cballmge not Easy Success. Educalional uadmhip.48(1).22·26. Clifford. M.M. (1991). Risk· Taking: Empirical and Educational Considmlions. EJwcaJioNd PsycMlagUl26. 263-291. Cote...... lS, l. Campbell, A.M. Wood, aod R.L. York. (1966). Equality 0/ ~OIWII OpptwtwtJl). Wuhiftstoa, D.C: Ullittd States Department of Health, Ed...cation and Welfare, Office of Education Cook, V. (1991). SeCONllllnglloge Le~ and Language Teaching Slyiu. NewYcwlcEdwanlAmold. Cushner, K... A. McCLeIlDd, and P Safford. (11)92, lIuman Diwr"1y 111 £ducallon: An 'nlrgraI#W Approach. New York: McGraw-Hili. Dako. K. (1997). FCitura of Stylistic Versatility in Englilh .. ObMrvcd in the University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Writing of English Gnduates. ID M.E. Kropp Dakubu. (Ed.). E",lish in GIttmo. Ac:aa: Gbana English Studies Association, 263-274. Doughty. C. And T. PiCli. (1986). lDformatioo Gap rub: Do They Facilitate Second Language Acquisitioa? TESOL Q»artt,ly. 20.305-325. Dzamesbic. A. (1991). Towards a Comrmmicative Appro.cb 10 Teaching Engliih as a Second Language. In M.E. Kropp Dakubu (cd.), Engluh ,,, Gha"tI. Accra: Ghana English Studies Association. 173-194. Ebmcicr. HR., and R.L. Ziomek. (1992). Increasing Engagement Rates of Low and High Achievers. A paper presented at the annual meetina of the Americ.m Educational Rcaearch Assotilltion, New York. Ellii, R. (1990). /mtrucred Second Ltvtpagf AcqvJsllion. Oxford: Buil Blackwell. Enuner, E.T., Evcrtson. C .. Sanford, J., and Clements, B.S. and Worsham, W.E. (1989). Clossroom MantJgemtnl for S,condtJry Teachers. (2" cd.) Englewood Cliffs, New Jm;cy: Prentice-Hall F1owerdew. L.. (1998). A Cultural Penpective on Grou~work. ELT Journal. 52 (4),323-329. Gisard, O. (1977). Motivation, The Responsibility ohhe Teacher. ELT Journa/3l (1),97-102. Hadfield, J. (1992). Classroom [)ynaMla. Oxford: Oxford UDiYCrlity Preu Heider. E.R., C.B. Cwen, R. Brown. (1968). SOC:W Clau Oifferenca in the Effectiveness and Style of Cbikbm'. Codinl Ability. Litcnc" Project RepM:I.. (9). Ithaca, New York: Cornell Uruvenily University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Holliday, A. (1994). ApproprlOte Methodology and Sociol Coltla'. Cambridge: Cambridge lhUversity Press. Hld. D. (1970). A Cooceptua1l..evel Matching Model foe Coordinating Leamer characta'iltiea with Educational Approacbes. Intuchange: A JO'fUPtIQ/ of £dvcotiontJ/Studiul,2-16. Hyde, F. (1991). On the State of Englisb Studies Among Fint Universrty Examinltioos Students lo the University of Ghana. A paper delivered at the African Linguistic Association Conference in Calabar, Nigeria. Jarvis, J. And R. Mark. (1997). Analysing Educational Discowse: An Exploratory Study of Teacher Reipome IDd Support to Pupill' Learning. Applied Llngvistia 18(2), 212-221. Johnson, K. (1995). IAnguog~ Teochltlg OM SIC/If 1Aar1ting, Oxford: Sui! Blackwell. Jo)U. B. and M. Weil (1996). Moden o/Teachlng. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Joyce, B. and B. Showers. (1995). SNJdenl Achiewmenr 7?vough Stoff Dwelopment. New York: Longmann. King, A. (1990). EnbaDcmg Peer lnteraction aod Le.vning in the Classroom Through Reciprocal QueRiooiDa. AmtriCQIJ &fuca/lonal Research JtnI1tQ/ 27,664-687. Kraft, RJ. (1994). Teaching and uanting itt Gitana: A Cf417lctJum, Tutboolc. SylllJ/nd ond HontIbook Analysts. URI\'enity of Colorado. The Milchell Group University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Iioiliday, A. (1994). Appropriole Methodology and SocUJI Cantul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. H .... D. (1910). A Conceptual Level M..lcbing Model [IX CoorttiDating Leamer CharactaistiCi with Educational Approaches. /""cNJnge: A JotVTVJl of EducaliottaISludiesl,2-16. Hyde, F. (1991). On the Stale ofEog1ls.h Studies Among First University Examinations Students in. the Univenity of Ghana. A paper delivered at the African Linguistic Association Confe~nce in Calabar, Nigeria. Jarvis, J. And R. Mark. (1991). Analysing Educational Discourse: An Exploratory Study of Teacher RespooiCI aDd Suppon to Pupils' Learning. AppI;~ LlflgWtics 18 (2), 212-228. Johnson, K. (1995), Language Teachmg and Skill Uanring, Oxford : Buil Blao1cwoU Joyce, B, IIld M, Weil (1996). ModelJ a/Teaching. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Joyce. B . and B. Showers, {I 995}. ShMiel1l Achlevemenl 77vough Staff Developmenl. New York: Longmann, Kin&. A. (1990). ~in& Peer lnteractioD and Learning in the Classroom 'Through Reciprocal QucstioDiP.a. A17Wrican EducaJlOnlll Re,uorch .Iow7to/ 21,664-081. Kraft, RJ. (1994), Teaching and Uanting in Ghana: A Curriculum, Textbook. SylloJn".r attd Handbook AnalysIS. Uoiw:nity of Colorado. The Mitchell Group University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Larscn-Freemu and M. Loag. (1991}An 1I1IrodIKiion to ~cond Language Acquuiliolt Ruearch. London: Loogmao.. Linn. M.e. aDd 1.S. Hyde. (1989). Gender, Mathematics and Science. Educationol R~searchtt" 18. 17-27. Lynch. 8.K. (1996). Languoge Program Evaluation-Theory and Pracllce Cambridge: Cambridge Univmity Press. Moore. N. (1913). H(1W 10 do Research. Londoa: The Libnry Association. Moskowitz. G. (1990). The Foreign Language Teacher InterQcts. Chic_go: Association for Productive TCllChing. Naiman. N .• M. FrOlic:b.. H. Stem IDd A. Todesco. (1978). The Good Language Leamer. ReJearch i" EdlKOIfOff Sniu, No.7. J4-38. Toronto: Ontario Institute forSludies lnEducation. Nukunya, O.K. (1992). Tradllion and Change in Ghana: An IntroducliOlllo Sociology. Accra : Ghana Universities Preas Odamncn, H .• A. [)enlcabe and I.E. Tsikata. (1994). The Problem ofEDJlilh LanguaKe Skills at the Unive:rsity Level. A Cue Study of FinI Year Law and Adr:nUUJtration Studeats at the University of Ghana. Legon Journo/ 0/ ,1te_rIu 7. 95-125. Owt..It-.AnIAb L.K. (1997). NativiNlion and the Maintenance ofStandardJ. in Noo-Nltive Varieties of EnaJiJb. In M.E. Kropp OeJcubu (ed.), Eng/uh jn Gitana. Act,.: Ghana English Studies Asaoeiallon. 22-33 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Larsen-Freem. aod M. Long. (1991) An InJroduction 10 S«ottd Language Acquisition Rucarch. London: Longman. Linn, M.e. .... 1.S. Hyde. (1989). Gmder, Ma!henuotics and Scieoee. &iucalionoi ReIHrchlrI8.17-27. Lynch. B.K. (1996). Lmtpage Program Evaluation-Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Moore. N. (1983), Hqw 10 do Research. Londoo: The Library Association. Moskowitz. G, (1990). The Foreign Latrguagr Teocher Interacts. Chicago: AS5OCiatioofotProductiveTeKhing. Naiman. N .• M. FrtUich. H. Stem and A. Todcsco. (1978). The Good language l...e&mer. Research '" EdtK:tuion Swiu, No.7. J4·38. Toronto: Onlatio 1nstitute fotStudies in Education. Nukunya. O.K. (1992). TraditIO" and ChMgf! In Ghana: An IntrodUCllon 10 Sociology. Accra: Ghana Universilies Press. Odamnen. H.,A. Denkabeand I.E. Tsikala.(1994). The Problem ofEnglisb Language Skills at the Univemty Level. A Cae Study of First Year Law IUld Administrllion Studeais It the: Univenity of Ghana. Legon JOlUnaJ of lite Hwmonjtiel7. 95.125. Owusu-AnIIb LK. (1997). Nativi.Jation and the Maintenance of Standards, In Non-Nllive Varieties of English. In M.E. Kropp Dakubu (cd,), EngJuh in GItmta. AccnI: Ghana English Shadies Auociation, 22·)3 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Pemberton. R.. E.S.L Li. W.W.W. Orud H.D. Pierson (eds.) (1996). Toling Control: AtIIOft()IrIIY in IAttguoge uarning. Hoog Kong: Hong Kong UniversiryPress. Pickett. G. (1971). Th~ Foreign Language Uanriltg Process. London: The British Council. Prodromou, L. (1995). Mued AbiliJyClasses. Hcrtfordshire: Phoenix ELT Rinvolucri. M. (1986). Strategies for. Mixed Ability Group. Pract;cal Eng/tilt Teaching. Vol. 7(1) Roseosbine, B. aod N.C. Furst. (1973). The Use ofDlrect Observation to Study TeKbing. In R. Travers (ed.). Secottd HQlttJDook oj Reseorch 011 Teaching. Crucaao: Raod McNally. RDsensbine. B., and R. Stq)heni. (1986). Teaching Functions. In M.e . Wittrock (ed.), Hattdboolc 0/ Res«ITh on Teaching (3n1 cd .• pp. 376· 391). Rubio, J. (1971). Adults LcamiJtg. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rubin, 1. (1917). What the Good I..topIgc UcnerCan Teach Us. TESOL Qwvttrly. Vol. 9 (1) Rutherford. W. (1987). & cond Languap GrQlfff1fQT Learl/ing and Teaching. Harlow: Longrnan. Rutherford, W. aod M. Sbarwood·Smith (edi.) (1988). Grammar and Second !.al/poge Tt ochmg. Rowley Mass: Newbury Houle. Sackeyfio, N.A ., KA . Adu, F.B. Hyde, and J.A. Sackey. (I99I). GlttmoSellior Se~ Schoof ElIgluh Boola } .J. Oxford: Oxford Univenity Press. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Pemberton, 1<.. as.1.. Li. W.W.W. Od M,Nally. Rosenshine, B., ud R. Sttphens. (1986). Teaching Func:tioDi. In M.e. Wittrock (cd.), Handboolc oJRestar/ron Tl!iWhing(3nf ed., pp, 376-391). Rubio. J. ( 1971). Ad14J1S Ll«7fiIrg. Oxford: OxfOld University Press. RubW,J. (1917). Wh" th.Good Laoguqe LeamerC. . T...,b Us. TESOL (luarrerly . Vol. 9 (1) RtOerford, W. (1987). Second Languop G,fIINN»' Learning and Teaching. IlarIow:LongllWl RU1herfo,d, W. lOcI M. Slwwood-Smith (ods.) (1988). G"""""" and Suond Langwzge Trachmg. Rowley Mass: Newbury Houle. Sackcyfio, N.A., K.A. Adu. F.B. Hyde. andJ .A. Sackey. (I99I). GIttlMSenior ~Scltool Enrluh Boots /·3, Oxford: Oxford UDiwnity Press. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Sadkcr, M. and D. Sadker. (1990). So Eql4ity Htmdbookfor Schools (2- ed.) New York: Loogman. Scheibl, R. (1984). Tapa for Mixed Ability Classes. Proclical E,..lish T«ocIriltg. Vol. 4(4) Sbarwood-Smitb. M. (1981). Consciousness Raising and the Second Language Leamer. AppI;~d Linguistics 2. 159·169 Slaven. R.E. (1983). Cooperaliw Ltomlttg. New York: Lonaman. Slav~. (1995). Cooperatiw L~Qrnjng. (2"'it ed.) Boston: Allyn and 8&000. Sblvin. R.E. • N.A. Madden. N. Karweit. BJ. Livennon and L. Dolan. (1990). Success fOT .11: First . Year Outcomes of a Comprehensive Plan for Reforming Urban EdUCItion. Americon EducationtJl Research Journal. 27, 225·278. Slavin. R.E., N.t. Karweit, and N.A. Madden. (1989). Eff~cliw Programs!", SiutMntJ 0/ Risk. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Swain, M. (1985). Conununicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible IDpta aDd Comprehensible ~pul in ill DevelopmenL In S. Gass and C Madden. (Eds.) Inpul in Second LtJlfpog~ AC4I4i.filjon. Rowley Mass: Newbury House.235-2S3. Tandoh. E. (1987). Aspecls of lite Wrllltl1 Engiuh of Umwrmy of GItoIlQ Students. An Wlpublished M.PhiI. TbeslJ, .ubrrutted to the depvtmmt of Linguistis. University of Ghana. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Sodk. .. M. md D. Sadker. (\990). Sa Eq.11y Handbook for Schools (2" cd.) New Vorl<, Loagman. Schdbl. R. (1984). Tips for Mixed Ability Classes. Procticlll English r#ochlng. VoL4(4) Sbarwood~Smith. M. (1981). Consciousness Raising and the Second Languase Leamer. Appli~d Linguistics 2. 159-169. Slaven, R.E. (1983). Coopermlw L«w,tlng. New York: Loqman Slav~E. (1995). Coopero/i've Learrting. (2""ed.) Boston: Allyn and BKOn. Slavin, R.E., N.A. Madden, N. Karweit. BJ. Livermon and L. Dolan. (1990). Success for all: Firat - YCM Outcomes of a Comprehenaive Plan for Reforming Urban Educatioa. American EdllCo/ionoJ Research Journal. 27, 225-278. Slavin., R.E. , N.L. Karweit, and N.A . Madden. (1989). Effective Programs lor StuMfIIs al Risk. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Swain. M. (198S). Communicative Competence: Some Roles ofComprehen.ible lDpl1 and Compreben.iib1e Output in its DevelopmenL In S. Gau and C Madden. (Eds.) /ttpW in S«ond LongwIge A.cquiJi/ion. Rowley Mass: Newbury House.23S-253. Tandoh, E. (19&7). AspeCIS of 1M Writ/en EtrgUsh oj Uni ....' sity of GNlfIQ StudenJs AD Wlpublithed M.PhiL Thelil, submined to the depar1mcnt of Linguistis. UniversityofGhana University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Sadktt. M. and O. Sadker. (1990). Sa Equily HandIJook for Schools (2" cd.) New York: Longman. Scheibl, R. (1984). Tips for Mixed Ability Classes. PractICal ElIglish Tt«hillg. Vol. 4(4) Sbarwood-Smilh. M. (1981). COOSCtoUiDCSS Raising and the Second Lanauage Learoer. AppJiedU"putics 2, 159-169. Slaven, R.E. (1983). Cooperativt Leo"",,,. New York: Loogman. Slaven.R.E. (1995). Cooperative Learning. (2114 ed.) Boston: Allyn and BICOn. Slavin. R.E .• N.A. Madden, N. Karweit. B.J. Livennon and L. Dolan. (1990). Success for all: First - Year Outcomes of a ComprehcoJive PL.n for Reforming Lrb3n Edueation. AfMrican Educational Research Journal. 27. 225-278. Slavin. R.E., N.L Karweit, and N.A. Mlidden. (1989). Elfectlvt Programs/or Studetrtl aI Risk. Boston: AUyn and Baoon. Swain., M. (1915). CommwUcative Competence: Some Roles of ComprehcnJible Input and Comprehensible Output In its Development. In S. Oua and C. Madden. (Eds.) IttpW In S«ond LangtIDge Acquisition. Rowley Mass NewbutyHouse.23S-253. Tandoh, E. (1987). Aspects of IIw Wrinen English of Univrn'sily 0/ GMNI Stwknls An unpublished M.Phi1. Thesis, ,ubonitlcd 10 the ~t of Linguistis.UniversityofGhana. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Sodk", M. "'" D. Sadkor. (\990). Sa EqwiJy Handbook for Schools (2" cd.) New York.: Loagman. Scheibl. R. (1984). Tips. for Mixed Ability Classes. ProcrictJJ EIwlah TNChing. VOt. 4 (4) Sharwood-Smith. M. (1981). Consciousness Raising and the Second Language Leamer. Applied Linguutics 2.159·169. Slaven. R.E. (1983). Cooperatiw lAarltlttg. New York: Looaman. Slaven.R.E. (1995). Cooperari\Je Leanung. (2illd ed) Boston: Allyn and BKon. Slavin, R.E., N.A. Madden, N. Karweit. BJ. Livennon and L. Dolan. (1990). Success for .U: First - YCM Outcomes of a Comprehensive Plan for Reforming Urban Education. A",*ricon Educational Research Journal. 27, 225-278. Slavin, R.E., N.L. Karweit, and N.A. Madden. (1989), EJJtctlw Programs/or Studitnu Q/ Risk. Boston: Allyn aDd Bacon. Swain. M. (1985). Communicative Competenc.e: Some Roles ofComprdlenlible Input and Comprebcn5ible Output in its Development In S. Gua and C Madden. (Eds.) l,."w In S«ond LtJIIgIU1ge Acquuilion. Rowley Mass: Newbury HOUIC.23S-2SJ. Ta.nOOh. E. (1987). Aspects of rlt~ Wrinell EngJuh 0/ University oj Ghana Sludenu An unpublished M.Phil. 'Thetis, subrnrtted to the department of Linguistis.UniversityofGhana. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Tomlinson, 8 . (1994). PrlgmWc: AwareDCiS Activities. Language AWQT~"SI 3 aod4,119-129 Ullman. R.. R . and E. Geva. ( 1981). 1M Target Ltmp,age Obsef"llolion Scheme (TALOS) Ha"dbook, Toronto: Modem Language Centre. Ontario, lmtilule for Studies in Education. Ullman, R., and E. Geva. (1985). Expanding Our EvalUitioo Perspective : What can Ci.assJoom Observatioa tell us about COR French Programs' TM CQlttlt/jon MOtkrn Language R~/f!"W 42 (2). 307-323. Ur, P. (1996). A Cowse In I.anguap Teoching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ur, P. (1988). Grammar Practice AClivitiu: A Practical GuUk / or Teachus. Cambridge: Cambridge Univen;ity Pm.i. Villegas, A.M. (1991). CulfllTally RupDlUtw Teaching . Princeton, New Jcney: EdUCltiooTcchnoiogy. Webb, N. (1989), Peer lnteractioa and Learning in Small Groups. lnrernoliolUl/ JoumaJ 0/ Educational Research, 23 , 253-261. Wong. W . (1996). ' How do Hoog Kong Students Lc.am? ' ImpllcatiolU f or Teaching. I;' Hong Kona: Educational TecbnoloKY Centre. Hoog Kong University ofScienee aod Technology. Woolfolk. A.E . (1995). Educalionol PsycJtology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh