University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF GHANA QUALITY OF MATERNAL HEAL THCARE IN FOUR DISTRICTS IN NORTHERN REGION, GHANA BY VICTORIA SHARON-LISA MUMUNI (10191732) THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEG ON, IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE IN PUBLIC HEALTH JULY 2019 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DECLARATION I, Victoria Sharon-Lisa Mumuni, hereby declare that this thesis was written by me in the School of Public Health of University of Ghana under the supervision of Professor Augustine Ankomah. Dr. Amos Laar and Dr. John K. Ganle. All references cited in this document have been duly acknowledged. W.('!3/.2.61u Date (Student) .... ~ Professor Augustine Ankomah Date (Primmy Supervisor) ,~/ ~~f$~:~:;··~ \>...1:o..~~?;p _~AmosLaar Date (Secondary Supervisor) ~ .. Dr John Kuumuori Ganle Date (Secondary Supervisor) University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all. I would like to extend my deepest appreciation to my supervisors, Professor Augustine Akomah, Dr Amos Laar and Dr John Kuumuori Ganle for their guidance throughout this academic exercise. I am very grateful, and I remain indebted to them. To Professor Philip Baba Adongo, I remain grateful for your unconditional love and support always. To Dr Patricia Akweongo for her encouragement, I am grateful. I wish to express my gratitude to my mother for her prayers and to all my brothers and sisters for their support in diverse ways in making this research work a success. To my good friend, Christiana and her family, I am forever grateful. My acknowledgement will be incomplete without a very special thanks to my husband and my beautiful kids for making this academic work possible. My sincere gratitude goes to all those who have in one way or another contributed and supported this work. My special thanks to Dr Philip Teg-Nefaah Tabong for his brotherly support and guidance throughout the process of this academic exercise. To my only sweet friend and sister, Dr Sodey Zakariah-Akoto, I remain indebted to you and the entire Akoto family - I am humbled and grateful for accepting me into your home and your great contribution that has made the completion of this thesis possible. Many thanks to Prof. Moses Deyegbe Kuvoame at the University of South East Norway for his support. I am grateful to you Dr Hannah Benedicta Taylor-Abdulai and the entire Abdulai family for your support throughout this academic work. To Dr Yvette Otto and the entire Otto family, I am extremely grateful for always accepting me as part of your family. Mr. BerUamin Aiddo, a very big thank you for your encouragement. To all my friends that have made my stay in Ghana a success, many thanks. To Mr. Victor Addo and family, I say a big thank you for all your support and words of encouragement. To you my friend and partner, Mr. Philip Bleboo, thanks for your advice, support and encouragement that has made the completion of this thesis very possible. ii University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Thanks to all of the visibility group, and staff of School of Public Health, Legon, for their encouragement and support. I am very thankful to all the women from the four districts in the northern region for their commitment that made it possible for me to conduct this research. My appreciation goes to all my research assistants and all the study participants. iii.. University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DEDICATIONS This thesis is dedicated to my beloved late father, husband and children, for their support and understanding as well as all mothers from Northern Region of Ghana. iv University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ABSTRACT Background: The quality of maternal healthcare women receive during pregnancy and delivery has attracted global attention. However, tools and empirical studies on quality of maternal healthcare women receive are lacking in many low-income settings including Ghana. Available literature shows that many of the current assessment tools are provider- driven, focusing mainly on clinical care aspect of quality without considering clients' perspectives. This study aimed to fill these knowledge gaps by developing and validating an assessment tool and using same tool to assess the quality of maternal healthcare in selected districts in Northern Region of Ghana. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed methods study design was used. This design was operationalised in three phases. The first phase was a qualitative exploration of clients' and providers' perspectives on quality of maternal healthcare. It comprised 6 focus group discussion sessions with 46 postnatal women and 39 in-depth interviews with postnatal women and 7 healthcare workers. The second phase of the design built on the first. This involved the development and validation of a quality of care assessment tool. Fifty-five (55) maternal and child health experts were purposively selected to assess quality of care domains that was proposed. The aim was to determine item's clarity and relevance on a 5-point Likert scale. The final phase involved administering the maternal healthcare quality assessment tool to a total of 520 randomly sampled postnatal women in a survey in four districts in the northern region (Tamale metropolis, Savelugu-Nanton municipality, Kumbungu and Sagnerigu districts) to assess quality of maternal healthcare they received during their most recent pregnancy. Thematic content analysis techniques were used to analyse qualitative data. Content Validity index (CVI), polychoric correlation co-efficient, and Item Response Theory (lRT) model were used, to assess suitability, correlation between items in each construct and reliability of the tool. Descriptive ....... .,.;~"' __I •.••. -_.- done to describe important demographic and maternal health v University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh characteristics of survey respondents. To assess quality of maternal healthcare women received, mean quality of care scores were obtained for each domain by adding the mean scores for individual items and dividing the results by the number of items in each domain. Based on this mean score for each domain, the quality of care under each domain was then recategorized into three scales, where a mean score of 1.0 - 2.0 meant low quality; mean score of 2.1- 3.9 meant moderate quality; and mean score of 4-5 meant high quality. Percentage distribution tables were then constructed to show the proportion of respondents who rated the quality of care they received as either low, moderate or high. Findings: Results from the qualitative interviews identified a total of 13 domains of care and 57 indicators of maternal healthcare quality. These domains included proximity of health facilities to clients, availability of infrastructure and other amenities, availability of logistics including equipment and medicines and good environmental sanitation, quality of the human resource/workforce. non-discriminatory provision of maternal healthcare services, interpersonal relationship, privacy of clients, pain management, Safety, outcome of pregnancy and client's satisfaction with the care processes and outcomes. Results from the experts' evaluation of the appropriateness and validity of the 57- indicators identified from the qualitative research showed that all the items of the construct were rated above a content validity index (eVI) of 0.6, where 0.6 was the benchmark below which items would be rated as irrelevant/inappropriate. However, following modification and pre- testing of the tool and further reliability testing of the items in the tool using item discrimination indices, only 47 indicators had acceptable item discrimination indices. These were, therefore, included in the final tool. Findings from the survey showed that overall, 72% of the respondents rated the quality of maternal healthcare they received as high, with 27% and 0.6% rating the quality of care as moderate and low respectively. The highest rated domain was the outcome domain with a mean score 4.26 ± 0.57. The proportion of women who rated the outcome domain as high was 91.15% while 8.08% and vi University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 0.71% of them rated it as moderate and low respectively. The least rated' domain was pain management, which had an average rating score of 3.14 ± 1.18, with 277(53.27%) of respondents rating it as high, 179(34.42%) rating it as moderate and 64(12.31%) rating as low. Conclusion: For any meaningful quality of maternal healthcare assessment to occur, there is need for including both women's and provider's perspectives. Although majority of women rated the overall quality of care, they received to be high, there is space for further improvement. There is the need for more attention to be paid to aspects of maternity care that were poorly rated by clients. In this regard, good inter-personal relationships with clients. better resourcing of health facilities and sustained collaboration between clients and healthcare providers is needed for enhancing the status of maternal healthcare in the region. vii University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ................................•........................................................•••........................ ~ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................... .............................................. 11 DEDICATIONS .................................................................................................................. IV ~~:;:~~:.:. ... ::::::::::::::::::::::.:: ....: ... ... :.: ... :.:: ... :.:::::::::::::::::::: ..•. ::~ LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ xv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................... . xvi OPERA TIONALIZAT ION OF KEY CONCEPTS ......................................................... xvii CHAPTER ONE ................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................, . ............................... 1 1.1 Background ..................... , ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Problem Statement............... .. ................................................................................... 6 1.3 Objectives of the Study ............................................................................................... 9 1.3.1 General Objective ................................................................................................. 9 1.3.2 Specific Objectives ............................................................................................... 9 1.4 Research Questions ................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Justification of the Study ........................................................................................... 10 1.6 Chapter summary and thesis outline ......................................................................... II CHAPTER TWO ................................................................................................................ 12 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Quality of maternal healthcare: concepts and definitions ......................................... 12 2.3 Quality of Matemal Healthcare: Evidence across the World ................................... 13 2.3.1 Quality of ANC Services in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ..................................... 19 2.3.2 Quality of matem al healthcare in Ghana ............................................................ 29 2.4 Improving Quality of Matemal healthcare: global policy responses ........................ 32 2.5 Policies/programmes for ensuring Quality of Matemal Healthcare in Ghana .......... 37 2.6 Maternal healthcare quality assessment.. .................................................................. 39 2.6.1 Health workers' perspective on maternal healthcare quality assessment.. ......... 40 2.6.2 Women's perspective on maternal healthcare quality assessment. .................... 41 2.6.3 Indicators and Tools for Quality of Maternal Healthcare Assessment .............. 42 2.6.4 Existing tools for maternal healthcare quality assessment ................................. 44 viii University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.7 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................................. S2 2.8 Conceptual Framework ............................................................................................. S6 2.8.1 Factors that influence quality of care ................................................................. S8 2.8.2 Structure, process and outcome domains ........................................................... S9 2.8.3 Outcome ............................................................................................................. 60 2.9 Chapter summary and gaps in literature ................................................................... 61 CHAPTER THREE ............................................................................................................ 62 METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 62 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 62 3.2 Study Design: mixed methods and its philosophical underpinnings ........................ 62 3.3 Study Location .......................................................................................................... 66 3.4 Description of selected study districts ...................................................................... 72 3.4.1 Profile of Tamale Metropolis ............................................................................. 73 3.4.2 Profile ofSagnerigu District. .............................................................................. 74 3.4.3 Kumbungu District Profile ................................................................................. 75 3.4.4 Profile ofSavelugu-Nanton Municipality .......................................................... 76 3.5 Study Population ....................................................................................................... 76 3.5.1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria .......................................................................... 77 3.6 The Qualitative study ................................................................................................ 77 3.6. I Sample Size for the qualitative research ............................................................ 78 3.6.2 Sampling and recruitment procedures into the qualitative study ....................... 79 3.6.3 Qualitative Data Collection methods and tools .................................................. 80 3.6.4 Data Quality Assurance ...................................................................................... 84 3.6.5 Qualitative Data Analysis ................................................................................... 85 3.7 The Quantitative Study ............................................................................................. 86 3.7.1 Development of Quantitative Tool for Quality of Care Assessment ................. 87 3.7.2 The quantitative survey design and data collection ............................................ 90 3.8 Ethical considerations ............................................................................................... 99 3.8.1 Ethical approval .................................................................................................. 99 3.8.2 Administrative Approval .................................................................................... 99 3.8.3 Informed consent ................................................................................................ 99 3.8.4 Confidentiality and Privacy .............................................................................. tOO 3.8.S Right of withdraWal .......................................................................................... 100 3.8.6 Risks and Benefits ............................................................................................ 100 '10., n...._ ... - - :l Use ....................................................................................... tOI ix University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.9 Same gender- interviewing: ethics and reflexivity ................................................. 101 3.10 Chapter summary .................................................................................................. 102 CHAPTER FOUR ............................................................................................................ 103 RESULTS: PERSPECTIVES ON QUALITY OF MATERNAL HEALTHCARE ........ I03 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 103 4.2 Participants' socio-demographic characteristics ..................................................... 103 4.3 What Constitutes Quality Maternal Healthcare: Women and Maternal Healthcare Providers' Perspectives ...................................................................................... '" ........ 105 4.3.1 Good Antenatal Care (ANC) services .............................................................. 105 4.3.2 Good quality care during labour and delivery .................................................. 111 4.3.3 Good postnatal care services ............................................................................ 112 4.4 Measuring/Assessing Quality of Maternal Healthcare: Women and Healthcare Providers' perspectives ................................................................................................. 114 4.4.1 Proximity of health facilities to clients ............................................................. 114 4.4.2 Availability of infrastructure and other amenities ............................................ 116 4.4.3 Availability oflogistics including equipment and medicines .......................... 118 4.4.4 Good environmental sanitation ........................................................................ 119 4.4.5 Human resource/workforce .............................................................................. 120 4.4.6 Discriminatory provision of maternal healthcare services ............................... 122 4.4.7 Range of services .............................................................................................. 123 4.4.8 Inter-personal relationship ................................................................................ 124 4.4.9 Privacy of clients .............................................................................................. 125 4.4.10 Clients' involvement in the care decision-making process ............................ 126 4.4.11 Mother and baby's safety ............................................................................... 126 4.4.12 Outcome of pregnancy ................................................................................... 127 4.4.13 Clients' satisfaction ........................................................................................ 128 4.5 Chapter summary .................................................................................................... 129 CHAPTER FIVE .............................................................................................................. 130 RESULTS: MATERNAL CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL ............................ 130 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 130 5.2 Selected characteristics of the experts .................................................................... 130 5.3 Domains of assessment ........................................................................................... 131 5.3.1 Health facility domain ..................................................................................... 131 5"'.13 .2 Amenities in health facility domain ................................................................. 132 '1 U_kl. 1':' __ !t!~..... do .nVU'Onment main ............................................................... 133 x University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.3.4 Privacy in health facility domain ...................................•••••.............................. 133 5.3.5 Inter-personal relationship domain ................................................................... 134 5.3.6 Human resource domain ................................................................................... 134 5.3.7 Safety in health facility domain ........................................................................ 136 5.3.8 Range of Services domain .............................................................................. . 136 5.3.9 Health insurance domain .................................................................................. 137 5.3.10 Logistics and supplies domain ....................................................................... 137 5.3.11 Pain management domain .............................................................................. 138 5.3.12 Clients' satisfaction domain ........................................................................... 138 5.3.13 Overall outcome ............................................................................................. 139 5.4 Additional items suggested by experts and final tool ............................................. 139 5.5 Item reduction and validity analysis ....................................................................... 140 5.6 Chapter summary .................................................................................................... 144 CHAPTER SIX ................................................................................................................. 145 RESULTS: QUALITY OF MATERNAL CARE IN NORTHERN REGION ................ 145 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 145 6.2 Respondents' socio-demographic characteristics ................................................... 145 6.3 Respondents' maternal characteristics .................................................................... 147 6.4 Women's rating of the quality of maternal care domains ....................................... 147 6.5 Women's rating of the quality of care domains ...................................................... 155 6.6 Rating of quality of maternal care by respondents' background characteristics .... 156 6.7 Chapter summary .................................................................................................... 159 CHAPTER SEVEN .......................................................................................................... 161 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................... 161 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 161 7.2 Summary and discussion offmdings on women's and healthcare providers' perspectives on quality of maternal care ....................................................................... 161 7.3 Summary and discussion of findings on the Development and Validation of Quality Maternal Care assessment tooL ..................................................................................... 168 7.4 Sumrnary and discussion of Findings on quality of maternal care in Northern Region ....................................................................................................................................... 169 7.5 Strengths and contribution of the Study to knowledge ........................................... 173 7.6 Limitations of the study .......................................................................................... 174 7.7 Chapter sununary .................................................................................................... 175 xi University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER EIGHT ........................................................................................................... 176 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................. 176 8.1 Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 176 8.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................... 178 8.2.1 Recommendations policy and practice ............................................................. 178 8.2.2 Recommendations for further research ............................................................ 179 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 181 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................. 214 Appendix A: Consent Form Information Sheet for Participants ................................... 214 Appendix B: Content Validity of Tool for Measuring Quality of Maternal Health Care ....................................................................................................................................... 217 Appendix C: Interview Guide for Midwives and Doctors ............................................ 220 Appendix D: Focus Discussion Guide for Women ....................................................... 221 Appendix E: Tool for experts in maternal healthcare provision ................................... 222 Appendix F: Survey questionnaire for women ............................................................. 226 Appendix G: Quality of Maternal HealthCare (Final Tool) ......................................... 227 Appendix H: Ghana Health Service Ethical Clearance Form ....................................... 230 xii University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh LIST OF TABLES Table I: Consensus Health Care Service Quality indicators .............................................. 48 Table 2: Dimensions of quality of care according to the Donabedian model .................... 53 Table 3: Distribution of IDI Participants by district.. ......................................................... 81 Table 4: Distribution of Focus Group Discussants by Age group and district.. ................. 83 Table 5: Districts and selected health facilities ................................................................. 92 Table 6: Independent variables and their measurements .................................................... 97 Table 7: Participants' socio-demographic characteristics(N=85) ..................................... 104 Table 8: Experts background characteristics .................................................................... 131 Table 9: Indicators for assessing health facility domain .................................................. 132 Table 10: Indicators for assessing amenities in health facility domain ............................ 133 Table 11: Indicators for assessing health facility environment domain ........................... 133 Table 12: Indicators for assessing privacy in health facilities .......................................... 134 Table 13: Indicators for assessing quality of inter-personal relationship ......................... 134 Table 14: Indicators for assessing quality of human resources in health facility ............. 135 Table IS: Indicators for assessing safety in health facilities ............................................ 136 Table 16: Indicators to assess range of services in health facilities ................................. 136 Table 17: Indicators for assessing health insurance domain ............................................ 137 Table 18: Indicators for assessing logistics and supplies in health facilities .................... 137 Table 19: Indicators for assessing quality of pain management in health facilities ......... 138 Table 20: Indicators for assessing clients' satisfaction with care received ...................... 138 Table 21: Indicators for assessing overall outcome of care .............................................. 139 Table 22: Suggestions from experts ................................................................................. 140 Table 23: Item discrimination indices of construct items ................................................. 141 Table 24: Final tool for assessing quality of maternal care .............................................. 142 Table 25: Respondents' socio-m, Nystedt, & Hildingsson, 2015; Tripathi et aI., 2015). In recent years, checklist-based interventions have been adopted by WHO (in 2008 and remodified in 2017) to aid management of complex or neglected tasks that risk serious human harm. In 2008, World Health Organization established a checklist-based childbirth safety programme with the goal of determining whether a simple, low-cost, scalable intervention with potential for broader testing could be devised (WHO, 2008). The WHO's Safe Childbirth Checklist was developed according to previously established methodology and tested for usability in ten countries in Africa and Asia (Weiser et aI., 2010). This checklist is mainly tailored toward clinical procedures such as monitoring stages of labour by assessing maternal and baby physiological processes such as heart-beat, respiration, blood pressures and contractions (Duysburgh et aI., 2014; Wall et a1., 2010). Adherence to this checklist is therefore used to measure quality of care provided during birth. In a related study, Spector et al. (2012) found that the use of such a checklist led to an over 150% increase in adherence to accepted clinical practices at any given birth event and that 28 of 29 individual practices were delivered with significantly greater frequency. This check-list was, however, 40 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh developed without consultations with healthcare providers who are supposed to implement these policies (Duysburgh et al., 2014). As observed by Lipsky (2010), frontline providers who do not make inputs are sometimes reluctant to implement those aspects of the policy that conflict with normal practices. 2.6.2 Women's perspective on maternal healthcare quality assessment The experience of giving birth has long-term implications for a woman's health and well- being (Crompton, 2002). Satisfaction with birth has been associated with several factors and the emotional dimensions of care have been shown to influence women's overall assessment (Karlstr~m et al., 2015). Individualized emotional support empowers women and increases the possibility of a positive birth experience (Moyer at el., 2014); therefore, women's views of what constitutes quality of maternity care are important indicators of quality service provision (Jackson, Chamberlin, & Kroenke, 2001; Tripathi et a!., 2015). In an earlier study, effective behaviour such as frequent and cordial engagement of clients during care was found to be the most important factor in determining patients' satisfaction (Bensing, 1991). A systematic review identified four key factors essential for women's satisfaction with the quality of care regarding birth (Hodnett, 2002). Two of these factors were directly related to the woman-caregiver relationship: first, the quality of the relationship between the woman and the caregiver, and second, the amount of support the woman received from the healthcare provider. The attitude and behaviour of the caregivers expressed in the relationship with the woman outweighed the effects of all other variables such as age, birth environment and medical interventions (Hodnett, 2002). In a related study, continuity of care was reported as very important for women because it contributed to their feeling of safety during labour (de Jonge et al., 2014). However, a study in Ghana reported that factors such as provision of good information, good communication and attitudes and availability of human (that . d . IS, more octors) and phYSical resources (that is, 41 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh more beds and water) at the facility were key element of a woman's views on quality of maternal care (Tun~alp et al., 2012). Again, assessment of quality of care from the clients' perspective is important but this does not take into consideration the perspectives of the healthcare provider and the institutional barriers. It would, therefore, be important to develop a tool that incorporates all these dimensions. 2.6.3 Indicators and Tools for Quality of Maternal Healthcare Assessment In most countries. there is no national accreditation system or mechanism to monitor the quality of care provided in health facilities despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines and tools. A few countries have mechanisms to assess the quality of healthcare but they are usually meant for specific population groups, conducted at a limited number of sites and address issues of care of national relevance (Austin et aI., 2014). Such accreditation systems, hence, do not adequately address the dynamic nature of quality of care and the associated problem-solving necessary to improve care (WHO, 2013b). They do, however, represent a launching point for a more standardized approach to assessing quality of care. A number of quality assessment tools including Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA), Consensus Health Care Service Quality indicators and the WHO integrated tool are available for assessing and auditing the quality of services provided at health facilities. Nevertheless, existing measures should be rationalized to obtain a unified framework for measuring results with a limited set of output and impact indicators. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH, 2013), in a study, argued that indicators for measuring quality of maternal healthcare should be action-focused, important, operational, feasible, simple and valued (NIPH, 2013). To be action focused means that the tool and indicator should be c Ie ar on hat should be W done to I. mprove outcomes 42 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh associated with the indicator (for example, vaccination to reduce neonatal tetanus). It should be important in that the indicator and the data generated should make a relevant, significant contribution to detennining how to respond to the problem effectively. To be operational, the indicator should be quantifiable and the definitions precise while reference standards are either available and tested or could be developed (NIPH, 2013). The indicator should also be feasible such that it can collect the data required for the indicator in the relevant setting. Finally, the indicator must be simple and valued, making it possible for the people involved in the service delivery to understand and rate (the indicator) (NIPH.2013). In their study in Europe on the use of maternal health indicators, Escuriet et al. (2015) found that a total of 388 indicators were identified capturing aspects of maternity care. Intrapartum care was the most-frequently measured feature through the application of process and outcome indicators (Escuriet et aI., 2015). Postnatal and neonatal care of mother and baby were the least-appraised areas (Escuriet et aI., 2015); however, these indicators are measured using quality tools. It has, thus, been argued that tools for measuring quality of care should specifically include process indicators (Gupta, 2008). Much of the background literature on tools for measuring healthcare refers to 'quality indicators' (also known as performance indicators or quality measures). These indicators may be structural, process or outcome in nature so they track significant changes such as deterioration and/or improvement within a specific area of care (Sibanda et aI., 2013). The monitoring of quality indicators is understood to substantially enhance understanding of what is working well or not, where efforts for improvement should be targeted and the evaluation of any introduced changes either within a particular unit of analysis (such as a hospital, a region and a country) or across units (Gibberd et al., 2004). 43 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.6.4 Existing tools for maternal bealtbcare quality assessment Identification and measurement of healthcare service quality attributes and patient satisfaction have been examined by several scholars. According to Woolley et al. (1978), patients' satisfaction is a product of quality and outcome, continuity of care, patient expectations and doctor-patient communication. In line with this thinking, Parasuraman, Berry & Zeithaml (1991) devised the SERVQUAL scale containing 5 dimensions, which used customer expectations and perceptions to judge the quality of service. These 5 dimensions are tangibles, reliability responsiveness, assurance and empathy. The SERQUAL scale was and has been deemed to cover expectations and perceptions of clients and also it met various criteria for reliability and validity (Babakus & Mangold, 1992). The strength of the SERQVQUAL's Scale lies in its strong reliability and consistency with its structures regarding the various dimensions for measuring quality in providing support for its validity assessment. The tool is also an accurate scale for measuring service reliability and validity to better understand customer expectations. The flexible nature of this tool allows it to be applicable across a broad spectrum of services. Despite these strengths, its 5 dimensions are not adequate to capture and measure the unobservable underlying constructs, which it intends to measure. The major weakness of the SERQVQUAL tool is that it was solely developed to measure customer expectations in commercial settings and not the expectations of clients who seek health services. Anderson (1995) adapted the SERVQUAL scale and designed two sets of tools containing 15 statements, each for measuring quality at in a health facility. The first set of tools measured expectations relating to university health clinics in general while the second set measured perceptions relating to University of Houston Health Centre in particular. The first five statements on expectations are that health centres should have up-to-date equipment; their physical facilities should be visually appealing; their employees should University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh appear neat; they should provide their services at the time they promise to do so and when patients have problems, health centre employees should be sympathetic and reassuring. The second set of five statements on expectations are that health centres should be accurate in their billing; their employees should tell patients exactly when services will be performed; it is realistic for patients to expect prompt service from the employees, who should always be willing to help the former, and patients should be able to feel safe in their interactions with the employees. In the last set of five statements, health centre employees are expected to be knowledgeable, polite, get adequate support from their employers to do their jobs well and give their patients personal attention. Finally, it is realistic to expect health centres to have their patients' best interests at hem1. Lim & Tang (2000) also adapted the 5-dimensional SERVQUAL tool and used it to formulate their 25-item tool for determining healthcare service quality in Singapore hospitals. They identified the following items in respect of tangibility: up-to-date and well-maintained facilities and equipment; clean and comfortable environment with good directional signs; neatness in professional appearance on the part of doctors; informative brochures about services and privacy during treatment. Reliability was accorded the follOwing five items: provision of services should be provided at the appointed time, carrying out services at the right time; professionalism and competence among doctors; error-free and fast retrieval of documents and consistency of charges. In respect of responsiveness (RS), Lim and Tang (2000) indicated that patients should be . . given prompt servtces; doctors and other staff should be responsive; attitude of 45 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh doctors/staff should instil confidence in patients and waiting time should not be more than one hour. The four items that fell under assurance (AS) were friendly and courteous doctors/staff; doctors' possession of a wide spectrum of knowledge; treating patients with dignity and respect and thorough explanation of medical condition to patients. In respect of empathy (EM), Lim and Tang (2000) indicated that Singapore hospitals should obtain feedback from patients as well as offer 24-hour service. Additionally, doctors and other staff should have patients' best interests at heart and also understand the latter's specific needs. Accessibility and affordability (AA) required the hospital to have adequate parking facilities and accessible locations. They should also have affordable charges for services rendered. labnoun and Chaker (2003) adapted the measurement dimension of the SERVQUAL Scale and developed a 39-item questionnaire to compare the quality of health service provision in private and public hospitals in Abu Dhabi, Sharjah and Dubai. The dimensions were put under four headings: empathy, tangibility, reliability and supporting skills. The items under empathy included concern for family and visitors as well as patients' needs. amount of time spent by staff in getting to know and understand patients' needs, politeness of physicians, ability of the hospital to treat patients the way the latter expect and responsiveness of the nurses to patients' needs. Tangibility is related to cleanliness of the hospital, pleasantness and appeal of the hospital rooms, availability of information about one's condition and sense of wellbeing one felt at the hospital. The items under reliability included availability of visitor parking, performance of services the way one was told it would be performed, ability of hospital to deliver what was promised in their advertising, skills of physicians attending to a patient, competence of staff in filling insurance 1I U. ms and admini" C stratlve responsI.v eness. Waiting 46 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh time for tests, speed and ease of admissions as well as discharge, waiting time for medication and time between admissions and getting into one's room were the other items under reliability. The three items under supporting skills were instructions about billing procedure and the nurses who perform the tasks. In a study in India, a 70 indicator point healthcare quality measurement instrument was identified as relevant to healthcare service in general. The indicators covered various aspects of the structural, process and outcome elements of the Donabedian model (Gupta. 2008). This instrument became known as Consensus Healthcare Service (Table 1). 47 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 1: CODsensus Health Care Service Quality indicators No Quality Dimension No Quality Dimension 1 Modern state-of-art equipment 23 Providing appointment at a time convenient to patients 2 Comfortable, clean and visually appealing physical facilities 24 Performing treatment, tests and surgeries at a time (stretchers, wheelchairs, waiting rooms, seating, lifts, stairs. convenient to patients examination/consultation rooms, wash rooms, directions, passages etc.) 3 Easy to understand, comprehensive and visually attractive 25 A vai lability of doctors at odd hours in case of emergencies materials associated with service (eg. information brochures, posters, report-cards, pamphlets etc.) 4 Neatly and appropriately dressed doctors. 26 Doctors accessible on phone 5 Neatly and appropriately dressed support staff (i.e. nurses, 27 Employees are always sympathetic and helpful administrative staff and other employees) 6 Convenient location of hospitaVdoctor (It can be quickly and 28 Employees are never too busy to respond to requests and easily accessed which is important during an emergence) needs of the patients 7 Good housekeeping and laundry 29 Prompt availability of drugs and other consumables required for treatment 8 Pathology lab, provides correct, quick and reliable results 30 Giving priority to treatment over paperwork 9 Ambulance 31 Giving priority to treatment over monetary transactions 20 Informing patients exactly when service will be provided 32 Courteous, polite and friendly doctor 21 Providing service at the appointed time 33 Courteous, polite and friendly support staff 22 Providing service without an appointment 34 Doctors make patients feel safe and relaxed 35 Support staff makes patients feel safe and relaxed 44 Devoting adequate time to carefully listen to the medical history and current symptoms of the patients 36 Medical condition of the patients is thoroughly explained and 45 Patience in responding to queries of the patients discussed by the doctor 37 Confidentiality of information 46 Understanding concerns and needs of the patients 38 Informing and explaining possible treatments 47 Reassuring the patients about the medical treatment and procedures 48 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 39 Explaining cost of service to the patients 48 In case of need, referring patients to other specialists 40 Infonning side effects ofmedicinesltreatment 49 Having patients' best interest at heart 35 Support staffmakes patients feel safe and relaxed 50 Follow up by doctor, whenever required 36 Medical condition of the patients is thoroughly explained and 51 Total health care system supporting quick patient recovery discussed by the doctor 37 Confidentiality of information 52 Educating patients 38 Informing and explaining possible treatments 53 Informing patients, at the time of discharge, about symptoms and health problems to look out for 39 Explaining cost of service to the patients 54 No overcharging 40 Informing side effects of medicinesltreatment 55 No overstay in the hospital 41 Employees get adequate support from their employers for 56 No discharge from the hospital before time helping patients 42 Providing privacy to patients 57 No unnecessary investigations and tests 43 Doctors providing personal attention to the patients 58 No unnecessary referrals to other specialists S9 No unnecessary procedures (treatments/surgeries) 60 Refer patients to another doctor in case of doubt or if unsure about diagnosis or treatment 61 No experimentation with the patient 62 Qualifications 63 Experience 64 Knowledge 65 Training 66 Skill 67 Referral contacts with specialists. hospitals and laboratories 68 Positive outcomes of the past treatments and procedures 69 Familiarity with latest advances 70 Explaining trade-offs between cost and benefit Source: Gupta, 2008 49 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh All these tools developed by Anderson (1995), Lim & Tang (2000) and labnoun and Chaker (2003) were adaptations of the SERQVQUAL Tool specifically for the assessment of healthcare services. Anderson's (1995) tool, for instance, extended the parameters of assessment to include the expectations and perceptions of clients who sought healthcare services, which were more specific in measuring quality of healthcare services in the health sector. However, a common weakness of these tools is that they assess general healthcare services and not specific to maternal healthcare services, which is the focus of this study. In addition, concepts and parameters of assessments of quality of healthcare applicable to these tools were borne out of ideologies of a developed western environment, which might not work in a developing country like Ghana. Besides, these tools measure quality of health care from the perspective of the health providers but not that of the client, which this study seeks to achieve. Although the Consensus Health Care Service Quality indicators are appropriate for the developing world, the tool is limited by the fact that it assesses general healthcare services. The limitations of these tools, therefore, called for the development of a more suitable tool to achieve the objectives of this study. Although new measurements such as Risk-Adjusted Primary Caesarean Rates, the Nulliparous term singleton vertex caesarean birth (NTSV) rate and the Adverse Outcomes Index (AOI) are more specific to maternal healthcare services (Foglia et aI., 2015; Shields et al., 2016), they are all clinical based and not patient-centred. They are only limited to caesarean deliveries and are, thus, not applicable to every pregnancy since it is not every woman who goes through caesarean delivery. The next tool that is used to assess quality of maternal healthcare is WHO's (2013) Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool. SARA is a tool for assessing and monitoring the availability of services at health facilities and the readiness of the 50 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh health sector to generate evidence for planning and managing a health system (WHO, 2013). The objective of the tool is to obtain reliable, regular information on service delivery (such as the availability of key human and infrastructural resources), the availability of basic equipment, basic amenities, essential medicines and diagnostics and the readiness of health facilities to provide basic interventions in family planning, child health services, basic and comprehensive emergency obstetric care and treatment and care for HIV, tuberculosis, malaria and non-communicable diseases (WHO, 2013). According to WHO (2013), the SARA tool is designed as a systematic survey to assess health facility service delivery. It aims at generating reliable and systematic data on health service delivery and service availability (such as the availability of key human and infrastructure resources) and the readiness of health facilities to provide fundamental healthcare interventions. The main SARA indicators include scope of availability of basic packages of essential health services offered by public and private health facilities, adequacy of qualified staff, resources and support systems available to assure a certain quality of services and level of preparedness of facilities to provide high-priority services such as reproductive health services, maternal and child health services, and infectious disease diagnosis and treatment (for example, HIV, sexually- transmitted infections, tuberculosis and malaria). The other indicators are the levels of readiness of facilities to respond to the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases and the strengths and weaknesses in the delivery of key services at hea1th-care facilities. SARA has aided in filling critical data gaps in measuring and tracking progress in strengthening of health systems, which WHO and its partners have been lacking over the years. SARA uses record review to assess data which serves as an accurate reporting 51 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh system on quality of health facilities. However, the limitation of SARA is that, though it is developed to measure quality of maternal healthcare services, it is a global assessment tool developed by WHO without taking into account the different needs of end-users from different countries and cultural settings. In addition, the developers of SARA did not incorporate the views of pregnant women and nursing mothers. In view of these situations, its adaptation and application may pose some challenges considering the varied developmental stages of member countries and their socio-cultural backgrounds. Afulani et al. (2017) developed a more-recent tool for assessing patient-centred maternity care in Kenya which is appropriate for developing countries. This tool focuses on views of pregnant women and nursing mothers by giving a voice to the end-users of maternal healthcare services. However, Afulani's tool failed to assess technical quality of care, which was identified by Donabedian (1966) as a structural dimension of quality of care. Also, the views of healthcare service providers were not included in the development of the tool. For a more holistic development of a maternal tool, the perspectives of both healthcare providers and women are important requirements. The narrowness of this tool therefore makes it inappropriate for this study; hence, the need to develop a more holistic tool which is relevant to this study. 2.7 Theoretical Framework In the past, quality of care has often been measured by assessing adverse medical outcomes such as disability or death, the latter being the most dominant outcome in the evaluation of quality in the perinatal period (Salinas et al., 1997). In sub-Saharan Africa, for example, quality of maternal healthcare has frequently been assessed in terms of facility readiness to provide delivery services (structural quality) or evaluated outcomes using case fatality rates and similar indicators (Kendall & Langer, 2015). Some 52 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh researchers have also evaluated quality in tenns of women's satisfaction with health services, identified by Donabedian as a care outcome, without assessing technical quality of care (Baltussen et a!., 2002; Anwar et aI., 2009; Anwar, 2009), However, the work of Av edis Donabedian provides a good theoretical framework, which defmes quality of care by three components namely, structure, process and outcomes (Donabedian, 1966). This study adopted the Donabedian framework (Avedis Donabedian, 1966). The framework consists of three components: structure, process and outcomes (see Table 2). Table 2: Dimensions of quality of care according to the Donabedian model Structural Indicators Process Indicators Outcome Indicators I.Financial resources 1. Preventive care 1. Health status 2. Personnel 2. Diagnosis 2. Outcomes of deliveries and preventive care 3. Equipment 3. Therapeutic care 3. Patients' well-being 4. Facilities 4. Rehabilitation 4. Patient satisfaction 5.lnformation system 5. Infonnation and instruction 5. Good use of resources of the patient Source: Bureau regional de I' Europe de I' organisation Mondiale de la sante( 1998) The "Structure" component refers to relatively- static characteristics of the personnel who provide care and of the settings where the care is delivered. These characteristics include personnel in respect of education, training, experience and certification. The availability of qualified personnel with adequate experience and a good service provider-client ratio are indicators of quality (EI Hajj, Lamrini, & Rais, 2010). Thus, even though Traditional Birth Attendants are not regarded by Ghana Health Service as skilled birth attendants their training as part of a community-based intervention package has been reported to have had significant impacts on referrals, early breast feeding, maternal morbidity, neonatal mortality and perinatal mortality by improving quality of care (ten Hoope-Bender et al., 2014). An adequate number of midwives has also been identified as important factors for maternal healthcare quality (ten Hoope-Bender et aI., 2014). 53 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The settings where the care is provided, which involve the adequacy of the facility's staffing, equipment. safety devices and overall organization, have been identified as other important component of structural quality. For example, the availability of soap and running water or an alcohol-based hand rub to prevent infection and the availability of a safe, uninterrupted supply of oxygen during labour and childbirth are core indicators of structural quality (WHO, 2013a). Also, stock-outs of drugs and consumables in health facilities affect the quality of care. The "process" component denotes all the activities taking place during the delivery of care to the patient (for example diagnosis, prescription, treatment, and information and instruction). It concerns the way in which care is delivered according to two further aspects: the technical and inter-personal. The technical aspect refers to the application of current medical science and technology to maximize the balance between benefits and risks. This aspect concerns the timeliness and accuracy of diagnosis, the appropriateness of therapy, complications and incidents that may occur during treatment and coordination between the various stages of the care delivery and between different disciplines involved (Ransom, Joshi, & Nash, 2005). The inter-personal aspect is related to the clinician-patient relationship and refers to the rules and standards regulating client-service provider interaction as well as ethical standards specific to health and to the patients' expectations (information, answering questions, asking about their preferences and involvement in taking decisions). Inter-personal relationship is important because it affects the technical performance. A study showed that women who were delivered in a health facility and were provided with information to notify health extension workers of labour and birth within 48 hours were closely linked with receipt of postnatal care in Ethiopia (Tesfaye et aI.,2014). 54 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh When evaluating the quality of care and services in a health institution in terms of process, Ransom et al. (2005) suggested that it is useful to distinguish between two aspects on which quality can vary. The first aspect appropriateness shows (whether the right actions were taken). The second aspect skill relates to how well actions were carried out in the client-service provider interaction). Quality of care may also be assessed in terms of outcome measures, which seek to capture whether the goals of care were achieved (Donabedian, 1997; Ransom et aI., 2005). In addition to the health-status indicators, there are other indicators related to the cost of care and patient satisfaction. Health-status indicators, according to EI Hajj et al. (2010), are of two main types: indicators of intermediate and final outcomes. Indicators of intermediate outcomes refer to the activity and quality of the process steps such as the rate of operating site infection, immunization rate, percentage of unplanned readmission and failure rate (EI Hajj et aI., 2010). On the contrary, indicators of final outcomes refer to the effect of the provision of care on health (quality of life, disability, death, complications) and either the presence of good events or the absence of bad events expressed in terms of quality of life and in clinical and physiological terms (EI Hajj et aI., 2010). In summary, Donabedian (1966) theorized that high quality care, measured in the form of the delivery of safe, effective and efficient healthcare provided in a timely manner and equitably distributed, is a function of structure, process and outcomes. Once the structural and procedural components of quality of care are achieved, it is expected that there would be reduction in adverse patient outcomes such as disability, hospital-acquired disease, dissatisfaction among clients and death (Gupta, 2008). The first strength of the Donabedian Framework lies in the fact that it gives a broad overview of how t-Ilth,.. ..... ' ....\ lity should be assessed m. genera l const'd en .o g both the 55 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh technical and process dimensions of quality assessment. This framework is, therefore, applicable to the general healthcare environment. Second, the three dimensions of the Donabedian model are linked in multiple dimensional and complex ways but, together, they cover all the areas in which we can observe quality issues and improvement in the health care settings. Despite its strengths, the Donabedian model conceptualizes healthcare indicators in general and is not tailored to specific health needs like women's health, maternal health and men's health. Also, the Donabedian model is not context specific and may not be applicable to certain cultural settings like those in Africa. In view of these weaknesses, the Donabedian model was adapted to develop a new conceptual framework (see Figure I) for use in this study. 2.8 Conceptual Framework Based on the Donabedian theoretical framework above, a conceptual framework (see Figure I) were developed to explain possible factors that could affect women's assessment of the quality of maternal healthcare in Northern Region. 56 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Predict rs of quality of car Domains ~ • Socjo-ciemographjc Amenities Human resources ~ Range of services Age, education, marital status, Environment/sanitation tribe, location, district type, Logistics and supplies type of facility, religion, Health facility/proximity occupation and income • Community factors Decision-making Quality of .~ Means of transport Maternal care: Privacy Availability of transport Interpersonal • High relationship • Moderat e • Obstetric factors Discrimination /fairness • Low Parity Safety for mother during Gravida delivery Pain management . ~ Availability of health facility .~ Distance to health facility Satisfaction Waiting time at health facility Safety for mother immediately post delivery Safety for baby post delivery Figure 1: Conceptual Framework of Quality of Maternal Healthcare The framework presents three dimensions for conceptualizing quality of maternal healthcare. lbese dimensions are the factors that could affect how women defme or 57 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh perceive the quality of care they receive, the domains of quality of care and the assessment of quality of maternal healthcare services. 2.8.1 Factors tbat influence quality of care The factors that could affect maternal healthcare quality are the fundamental determinants of quality assessment process. These factors consist of the socio-demographic elements of care recipients (that is women), obstetric factors, socio-economic factors, socio-cultural factors and access. The socio-demographic factors include woman's age, educational level, marital status, ethnic background, place and district of residence and type of health facility available in that district. The socio-economic factors consist of the occupation of the women who are the users of maternal healthcare and their income levels. Community factors include the health decision-making process of women who utilize maternal healthcare services, the means of transport to a healthcare facility and accessibility to the health facility. The obstetric factors that influence the ratings of quality of maternal healthcare services provided to women include parity and gravida. Thus, the number of children a woman has and the number of times she has been pregnant before has influence on the ratings of quality of maternal healthcare assessment. The elements of access to the available healthcare facility, the distance to the health facility and the waiting time at the health facility before being attended to by a heaIthcare provider influence the rating of quality of maternal healthcare assessments. Each of these factors also influence the rating of each domain of healthcare quality and influences directly the quality of maternal care services. 58 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.8.2 Structure, process and outcome domains The structure dimension indicates all the vital resources that are needed to produce quality maternal healthcare. These resources include accessible and safe amenities such as buildings, adequate and functional equipment, appropriate hours of operation and stable financial status that will provide good quality care on a consistent basis to women. Human resources and the environment consist of enough well-trained maternal healthcare staff like medical doctors. gynaecologists, midwives and laboratory technicians who either directly or indirectly provide services at health facilities to women. These services should be delivered in a safe and clean environment that is necessary to provide quality care to women. The range of services provided to women that have a significant influence on the rating of quality of care provided include laboratory, ultra-sounds and scan services. Women expect these services to be available and accessible within the health facility so that they do not have to walk or travel to different locations to access them. The second dimension of the domains is that of process. This level involves all the patient- provider interactions during care. Elements in the process dimension include fairness and access to good quality care, privacy and inter-personal relationship. Fairness and access to accuracy of diagnosis and treatment based on scientific and professional knowledge, non- discrimination and elimination of stigma and bias with regard to insurance policies as a domain has influence on the rating of the quality of maternal healthcare women receive during antenatal, delivery and postnatal care services. Women need privacy and confidentiality in the consultation rooms during examination, diagnosis and treatment. This domain is particularly important in Islamic communities. Inter-personal relationship here refers to the interactions during diagnosis between the women who seek care and the healtbcare provider. These interactions should be based on dignity and respect without S9 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh abuse of any kind. Thus, failure at this level affects the treatment regime or the continuum of the care services provision process. 2.8.3 Outcome The final domain is the outcome domain, which is referred to as the result of care. Outcome of care can be either a subjective or objective measure. Subjective measures can be women's perceptions of symptoms or self-rated pain. Outcome measures for maternal health care include women's satisfaction, safety for mother and safety for the baby. Women's satisfaction with the use of healthc are services influences positively the rating of quality of services received. Ideally, women should be provided with the needed care and should be very satisfied with the services. However, in practice, the situation is different in many contexts. The safety of women during delivery and the immediate post-delivery periods is critical and therefore, it is considered a very important outcomes of the care process. These are usually the stages when skilled birth attendance averts and manages complications and hence averts preventable deaths. This period is thus considered the most important aspect of the care stages for healthcare providers and the women as well. This factor, therefore, influences the ratings of quality of maternal care services. The safety of the baby during and after delivery is said to have an influence on the rating of the quality of care by both healthcare providers and the women who patronize maternal healthcare services. In summary, the predictors in this framework which include the socio-demographic factors, (such as economic factors), community factors, obstetric factors, and access factors influence directly the rating of quality of care as either low, moderate or high. This conceptual framework differs from the Donabedian Model in several ways. First, whilst the Donabedian model looks at general healthcare, the framework in this study looks at 60 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh only quality of maternal healthcare. Second, the developed framework considers the socio- demographic factors, (including economic and cultural factors), community and obstetric factors which are not found in the Donabedian model. Furthermore, the Donabedian model does not consider the various domains that influence healthcare quality whilst the framework this study did. Moreover, the Donabedian model does not indicate how various factors interrelate and influence the rating of quality of healthcare by clients. Finally, while the Donabedian model conceptualises quality and helps us identify quality issues in the healthcare settings, the framework developed for this study goes beyond just identifying quality issues to indicating how mothers rate the various heaIthcare services they received during the most recent pregnancy. 2.9 Chapter summary and gaps in literature From the literature review, quality of maternal healthcare has become an important aspect of efforts to improve maternal and new-born health. However, many of the tools that have so far been developed to measure maternal heaIthcare quality only measure quality at various stages of the maternal care period with none covering the whole spectrum of all the stages- that is, from the antenatal through the delivery to the postnatal from antenatal, delivering and postnatal stages. In addition, these tools have been developed in middle and high-income countries. However, studies have clearly shown that indicators of quality of care differ between low-income and high-income countries (Moyer, 2014). Furthermore, the available tools often focus on the technical aspect of maternal healthcare with little attention given to women's perspectives. It is on the basis of these gaps in literature that this study developed a tool that encompasses the entire spectrum of the three stages of maternal healthcare services and to use this tool to assess the quality of maternal healthcare WOmen received during pregnancy, labour and childbirth in four districts in Northern region of Ghana.. In the next chapter, the empirical research methods are discussed. 61 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER THREE METHODS 3.1 Introduction This chapter discusses the methods of the research. The chapter is divided into three parts. The first part presents the research design and its epistemological underpinnings. The second part describes the research setting, the study population, sample size estimation, sampling, data collection and analytical methods. The third part discusses ethical considerations in the study. 3.2 Study Design: mixed methods and its philosophical underpinnings A sequential mixed methods design was adopted in this study. By mixed methods, I mean a research design that is opened to multiple methods of data collection and analysis, including a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods of investigation for the purpose of answering a research question in a single study. This approach involves gathering and integrating both qualitative and quantitative data in a study such that it ensures that the ultimate strength of the study is enhanced compared to using only qualitative or quantitative methods (Creswell, 2009). It must, however, be noted that various terminologies have been used to describe this type of mixed methods study design. Some authors refer to it variously as integrating qualitative and quantitative methods; interrelating qualitative and quantitative data; methodological triangulation; multi-methods design and linking qualitative and quantitative data (Fearon & Laitin, 2008; Morgan, 2013). Others refer to it as a mixed methods research (plano et al., 2008; Creswell, 2009). What is important to note in all these tenninologies is the central focus on combining and integrating multiple methods in a single study as defined by Creswell et al (2008): 62 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh A mixed methods study involves the collection or analysis of both quantitative and/or qualitative data in a single study in which the data are collected concurrently or sequentially, are equal given a priority and involves the integration oft he data at one or more stages in the process of research (pp. 165). Creswell (2009) adds that a mixed methods study also includes mixing different data collection tools within qualitative (e.g. focus group discussions and key informant interviews) or quantitative research (e.g. surveys and cohort studies). The assumption underlying a mixed methods approach is that combining both qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection and analysis provides a more holistic understanding of the research question under investigation. Again, in conducting mixed methods studies, several typologies for classifying the strategies used in generating data have been described (Plano et aI., 2008; Creswell, 2009). Even though three main mixed methods designs have been proposed - that is, sequential, concurrent and nested approaches- there has been agreement on three basic designs, namely exploratory, sequential mixed method and convergent parallel mixed methods design. Sequential mixed method design occurs when one method of data collection precedes the other, so that the outcome of the initial research informs the next data collection process. However, when two or more sets of data are collected using different methods at the same time or simultaneously, the process is termed concurrent design. The concurrent design is particularly useful when the ordering of the data collection process is not important in determining the outcome of the study (Creswell,2009). In the current study, the exploratory sequential design was used with both qualitative and quantitative methods being given equal priority at each stage of the research process (see Figure 2). 63 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Stage 3 Stage 1 Stage 2 Development and Quantitative Qualitative validation of tool • FGDs • Cross-to assess quality sectional • lOIs of maternal survey healthcare Figure 2: Stages of tbe Study The first phase of the data collection process was a qualitative exploration of clients' and providers' perceptions of quality of maternal healthcare. Qualitative research involves a holistic approach to research in which where the researcher develops a level of detail from high involvement in the actual experiences of what is being studied and the data presented in textural form (Creswell, 2009; Williams, 2007). The outcome of this qualitative study informed the second phase of data collection, which involved the development of key indicators for assessing maternal care quality. The third and final phase involved administering the maternal healthcare quality assessment tool to women in a survey to assess quality of maternal healthcare. The quantitative component of this research also helped to create meaning through numerical measurement of the situation (Williams, 2007). Data sets from the three research phases were analyzed and reported separately but the two methods were integrated at the discussion stage. A mixed methods design was used in this study for several reasons. First, previous studies in developing tools on quality of antenatal care have largely employed quantitative methods. To address the limitations inherent in either solely using a qualitative or quantitative study design, this study employed mixed sequential methods to address the existing methodological gap/weakness. Second, Creswell & Garrett (2008) have observed that a strong mixed methods design necessitates that qualitative and quantitative data bold 64 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh independent research purposes and that the qualitative and quantitative components work together to mutually strengthen the research findings from each source. In the current study, four specific objectives were pursued. The fU"St 2 objectives, namely to assess the perspectives of women and maternal healthcare providers on what constitutes quality maternal healthcare; and to assess women views about how quality of maternal healthcare should be assessed, lent themselves very well to qualitative analysis. However, the last two (2) objectives, namely to develop and validate a tool for measuring quality of maternal health care in Northern Region of Ghana and to assess the quality of maternal healthcare women received during their most recent pregnancy, labour and childbirth in the region, lent themselves to quantitative analysis. These opposing views suggest that using either qualitative or quantitative methods alone would have been inadequate. Third, triangulation, complementarity, development, initiation and expansion have been outlined as the five main purposes served in conducting mixed methods research (Plano et aI., 2008). In this current study, the purpose for employing the mixed methods approach was for the development of a tool aimed at measuring quality of maternal healthcare from the perspective of clients and service providers. To achieve this purpose, focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were conducted among clients and service providers to assess their perceptions of what constitutes quality of maternal healthcare and how quality of maternal healthcare can be assessed. This exercise too suggested that using only a qualitative or quantitative design would not have been helpful in generating indicators of maternal healthcare quality and subsequently developing a quantitative tool to measure quality of care from the perspective of clients. In terms of the epistemolOgical and! or philosophical underpinnings of the mixed methods design used in this study, pragmatism has been proposed (Plano et aI., 2008). Pragmatism, as an istem l' . . ep 0 ogIcal onentatton to knowledge and its generation, maintains the practical 6S University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh use of any of the research methods, be it constructivist (which is aligned with qualitative research) or post-positivist (quantitative) worldviews in answering one' s research question. In other words, the pragmatist concentrates on the nature of the research questions and finds the most suitable approach to addressing the issue without aligning itself to only one reality or philosophical paradigm (plano et al., 2008). Hence, the central focus for the mixed methodologist or pragmatist is the "what" and "how" of the research problem under investigation and the best approach to understanding issues pertaining to it. As the objectives of the present research lent themselves most to the use of mixed methods, a pragmatic epistemology was indeed apt. 3.3 Study Location This study was conducted in four selected districts in the then Northern Region of Ghana (see Figure 3). Before the creation of two additional regions Savanna and North East Regions out of Northern Region in 2019, it was the largest among the three regions in the northern part of Ghana. Indeed, it occupied an area of about 70,383 square kilometre, and this constituted the largest region in Ghana in terms of land area. It shared boundaries with Upper East and Upper West Regions to the north, Brong Ahafo and Volta Regions to the south, and RepUblic of Togo to the east and La Cote d' Ivoire to the west. The region was divided into 26 political/administrative districts headed by District Chief Executives. The region had a projected 2014 population of 2,779,877, which was about 10.2% of the total national population. Females formed the larger proportion: 1,249,574 (50.3%) versus 1,229,887 (49.7%) for males. Population growth rate was about 2.9 per annum (GSS, 2011). The population was characteristically distributed in small settlements with popUlations of between 200 and 500 people (GSS, 2011). There were over 5,000 settlements in the region, out of which 54.4% had populations less than 200 people (GSS, 2011). The 66 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh distances between settlements were ft en Io ng, and this peculiar pattern of distribution of 0 the population in the region have adverse implications for health service delivery as Sub- district Health Teams (SDHTs) have to travel long distances during out-reach programmes to deliver services to only small proportions of their target populations. K \' H t I AdjOining Otlb'lota AcQolnlng Region Figure 3: Map of Northern Region Showing Study Districts The major ethnic group in the region is Dagomba. Other major groups are the Gurma, Konkomba Basaari Bimoba, Chokosi, Gonja and Chumburu. Islam is the dominant religion (60%) (GSS, 2014). This proportion, however, varies from one district to another. Regarding education and literacy, the 2010 Population and Housing Census (GSS) indicated that 63% of the population who were 11 years old and above were illiterate in English and Dagbani. However, about 19% were literate in English and a Ghanaian language. 67 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The primary economic activities are agriculture, hunting and forestry (GSS, 2014). Subsistence agriculture is predominantly practised, although commercial farming is gradually becoming popular among a section of the population. Over 95% of the economically-active population are employed in the informal private sector (primarily agricultural-related employment). In the relatively urban centres, the main common commercial activities are provision of services including transport and trading. Trading in the region is dominated by women. Many women are engaged in retail trade; however, a few also engage in inter-regional trading activities (Awedoba. 2006; GSS, 2013). In terms of socio-cultural organisation, although Northern Region is ethnically diverse, it has a lot of common social and cultural organisational characteristics. Polygyny is the dominant form of marriage in most parts of the region (Awedoba, 2006). This form of marital arrangement ensures that more children are produced to serve as farmhands for parents (Awedoba. 2006; GSS, 2014). In recent times, however, this practice is on the decline due to the challenges associated with meeting the needs of every child (Awedoba, 2006). After the marriage ceremony, couples are expected to live together with the wife joining her husband on a compound that may be headed by the latter's father, in most cases when the husband is still young. The household typically comprises the couple, their children and other close kin of the husband (Awedoba, 2006). In the past, married adult sons may remain in their fathers' households or break away and found their own households but in recent times, moving out of the fathers' compound is more common resulting in increased sizes of nuclear families at the expense of extended families (Awedoba, 2006). According to Ghana Statistical Service (2014), the average size of households in Northern Region is 5.4 persons, which is higher than the national average of 4.0 persons. The possible reasons for the large sizes of households are polygyny, high 68 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh fertility and the common practice whereby members of nuclear and extended families live together (GSS, 2013). Child betrothal and early marriage are other common practices in most parts of Northern Region (Awedoba, 2006). Girls as young as 14 years are given out for marriage with older men usually old enough to be their fathers. This situation has resulted in some girls migrating out of both their communities and their matrimonial homes to cities to avoid being married out of their will (Awedoba, 2006). In addition, males often wield authority and are the bread-winners of the families whilst women are subordinates and dependants who support their men in managing the affairs of families. This practice is common because Northern Region is largely patriarchal. Men are therefore the main decision- makers in most communities in the region but women, especially the elderly, are sometimes consulted before main decisions are taken (Awedoba, 2006). Since men wield greater authority in many patriarchal societies, they have access to land, information and many other resources while women are supposed to be taken care of by the former and therefore should be subservient (Buor, 1996; Awedoba, 2006). Despite this dominant practice, the average percentage of female heads of household in the region (14%) is higher than the national average of II %. This phenomenon could be attributed to either deaths or migration of the substantive male heads of families. Thus, in recent times, the traditional trend in the region is gradually changing. giving females the opportunity to wield power in some sections of society. Furthermore, most communities in Northern Region are predominantly organized along patrilineal descent. The patrilineal system of family arrangement and inheritance determines one's membership and status in a family and commuru·ty . SI' Dce thi s practI'ce. IS sustained by patriarcbal beliefs, the associated rights to access and use of family or 69 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh community resources are traced to ties with the father (Apusigah, 2009). Succession and inheritance therefore depend on status in the family. Since women in Northern Region have lower status in both their biological and matrimonial families, they do not inherit from either their fathers or husbands but sons do so and even inherit from their mothers. This practice denies women the opportunity to own important resources such as land, which is a basic factor of production. Even though married women may temporarily acquire pieces of land from their husbands or brothers, the produce from such land is meant for only household consumption while the land can be taken back at the whims of the husband or brothers (Apusigah, 2009). Women in such situations have no power in the allocation and control of resources in terms of decision-making in the family (Pearson 1992). The lack of control and power over resources leads to the subordination of women. (Apusigah, 2009). In terms of fertility, mortality and maternal and child health in the region, data from the 2010 Population and Housing Census show that Northern Region has a total fertility rate (TFR) of 3.5. The general fertility rate is roughly 102. This means that for every 1,000 women in the region, there are likely to be 102 births (GSS, 2014). Early child-bearing is common in the region. Child-bearing in the region begins as early as ages 12-14 years with the mean number of children ever born being 1.3 (GSS, 2014). Although the mean number of children ever born at ages 12-14 is higher in urban (1.4) areas than in rural areas (1.3), for the rest of the age groups, the rural mean number of children ever born is higher than the urban mean (GSS, 2014). The 2010 PHC report further shows that the deaths of infants (children under 1) in Northern Region is slightly higher than the national rate. According to Ghana Maternal Health Survey (2017), during the years 2015 and 2016, Northern Region recorded a total 70 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh of 1,655 pregnancies out of which 90.3% were live births, with 1.7% stillbirths, 6.8% miscarriages and 1.2% abortions. In terms of provision of maternal healthcare services, Ghana Health Service 2016 report indicates that Northern Region recorded the highest coverage of over 100% of ANC services. The findings in the last 5 years show that 50% of districts in the region even recorded ANC coverages of over 150% and, in some cases, over 200% in urban areas like Tamale Metropolis (GHS, 2017). As many as 97.7% of the women sought antenatal care from skilled health providers. Also, 87.2% of the pregnant women met the WHO recommended 4+ ANC visits while 65.8% were protected against neo-natal tetanus. In addition, 59.3% were delivered by health professionals in health facilities (59.2%) (GHS, 2017). Northern Region has, however, recorded consistent increases in anaemia prevalence among pregnant women since 2016, even though the rates in regions in the south have stagnated. In connection with maternal mortality, the Ghana Health Service reports for the periods 2014-2016 show that Northern Region has an increasing proportion of women who are at risk of dying in comparison with women in other regions even though seven out of the ten regions recorded increases in maternal mortality ratio (GHS, 2017). Specifically, 107, 144, and 207 maternal deaths were recorded in the region in 2014,2015 and 2016 respectively. The Northern Region however recorded one of the least rates of teenage pregnancy cases in the country. But contraceptive use in in the region is lowest (17%) in the country (GSS et aI., 2017). Generally, supervised delivery in Northern Region increased marginally between 2013 and 2015. For instance, Northern Regional Ghana Health Service Report (2016) showed that 71 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh supervised deliveries increased from 47.4% in 2013 to 53.3% in 2014. This rate, however, declined marginally to 52.8% in 2015. This decline has been attributed to fluctuations in the doctor-population ratio in the region since 2012 (GHS, 2017). The doctor-population ratio for the region in 2012 was 1: 109,391. Though this ratio slightly declined to I: 112,563 in 2013 and further to I: 115,828 in 2014, it improved drastically to I: 60,862 in 2015. The nurse-population ratio in the region has nonetheless seen some improvement. In 2012, the ratio was I: I ,407 but it rose to I: 1, 231 in 2013. The ratio improved further to I: 1,222 in 2014 but in 2015 it declined to 1:1,670 (GHS, 2017). 3.4 Description of selected study districts Within the then Northern Region, a total of four districts were selected as study sites. Two of these districts - Tamale Metropolis (urban) and Sagnarigu district (rural) - were initially selected and used as sites for the qualitative study. These two districts were purposively selected based on specific factors. All the 26 districts were grouped into urban and rural based on Ghana Statistical Service's classification. Health indicators for each district under each category were reviewed. From the review, Tamale Metropolis emerged as the district with highest numbers of both ANC and post-natal (PNC) registrants of 22,727 and 24, 144 respectively. The corresponding rural district with the highest number of ANC and PNC registrants was Sagnarigu with 5, 713 and 4, 141 respectively (GHS, 2016). The two districts were also reported to have the highest maternal mortality in the region (GHS, 2016). Antenatal care attendance is high in the study area in both Sagnarigu and Tamale metropolis. However, skilled birth attendance is low: 54% in the region compared to the national average of 74%. Thus, while antenatal attendance is high, skilled delivery is low leading to maternal mortality at the facilities. 72 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The other two districts - Savelugu-Nanton Municipality (urban) and Kumbungu (rural) were later randomly selected as the two initial districts for the quantitative survey. The random selection process involved writing the names of the reminder of the 24 districts on pieces of paper, mixing the papers in a hat and allowing a blind-folded person to randomly select district numbers. It was necessary to include these two additional districts to ensure representativeness of the study and to ensure that there were sufficient numbers of potential respondents to meet the minimum sample required for the quantitative survey in the third stage of the research process. A brief profile of each of the four study districts is provided below. 3.4.1 Profile of Tamale Metropolis Tamale Metropolis is located in the central part of the region and shares boundaries with Sagnarigu District to the west and north, Mion District to the east, East Gonja to the south and Central Gonja to the south-west (GSS, 2011). It had a population of 233,252, representing 9.4% of the region's population. Females constituted 50.3% of the population. Total Fertility Rate is 2.8, which is slightly lower than the regional average of 3.5. The General Fertility Rate is 79.9 births per 1000 women aged 15-49. The municipality has a teaching hospital in addition to one district hospital, Tamale West Hospital (TWH). The number of health facilities within the metropolis is quite satisfactory. However, most of these facilities which are in the rural areas, are poorly equipped. Tamale Teaching Hospital and Tamale West Hospital are the only well- equipped facilities. Even though efforts have been made to improve access to health services, patronage of these facilities have been low particularly in the rural areas owing due to poverty, illiteracy, ignorance and poor staffIDg of the facilities. 73 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.4.2 Profile of Sagnerigu District Sagnarigu District shares boundaries with Savelugu-Nanton Municipality to the north, Tamale Metropolis to the south and east, Tolon District to the west and Kumbungu District to the north-west. The district had a population of 148,099, representing 6% of the region's total population (GSS, 2014). There were 74,886 (51%) males and 73,213 (49%) females in the district. Although the district has only 20 urban communities out of a total of 79, 63% of the population live in the urban communities, making it a relatively- urbanised district. There are approximately 23,447 households in the district with an average of 6 persons per household. Children constitute the largest proportion of the composition of households (43%). The district has a Total Fertility Rate of 3.3, which is slightly higher than the regional average of 3.5 (GSS, 2014). Out of an estimated number of 582,897 women within the 15-49 age group in Northern Region, 38,548 (6.6%) are in the Sagnarigu District. The majority of households (84.2%) are engaged in agriculture. They are involved in the production of crops, including cereals like maize, rice and millet. Some local and exotic vegetables are also grown in the dry season around mini-dams and dug-outs. Regarding literacy, 60% of the population who are aged 11 years and above are literate while 40% are illiterates. The proportion of male literates (68%) is higher than that of the females (52%) in the population aged II years and above. In connection with economic livelihoods in the district, 59% of the population aged 15 years and above are economically active while 41 % are not. Regarding the economically- active population, 92% are employed while 8% are unemployed. The proportion of the population who are not economically active consist of those in school, tho se pe.l1..0cm.u'n g 74 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh household duties and those who are either disabled or too sick to work. The employed population are engaged in a variety of economic activities such as services and sales, crafts and related trades, agriculture, forestry and fishing. More than half (57%) of the population are self-employed without employees. The private informal sector employs the majority of the economically-active population in the district. 3.4.3 Kumbungu District Profile Kumbungu District covers a land mass of approximately 1,599 km sq. The district is bordered by Mamprugu/ Moagduri District to the north, Tolon and North Gonja Districts to the west, Sagnerigu District to the south and SavelugulNanton Municipality the east. The district is made up of 115 communities. The administrative capital is Kumbungu. The 2010 population and housing census estimates the total population of Kumbungu District to be around 39,341, made up of 19,686 (50.04%) males and 19,655 (49.96%) females. The population of the district is largely youthful. Out of the 115 communities in the district. only Kumbungu and Dalun are urban, therefore, the greater proportion of the population live in rural communities with poor health services. More than half (61%) of the population in the district aged 12 years and above are married. In terms of literacy, only 26 per cent of the population 11 years and above are literate while 74 per cent are illiterate. The proportion of males who are literate is higher (32.9%) than that offemales (19.3%). A high proportion (81%) of the population aged 15 years and above are economically active while 19 percent are not. Virtually every household in the district is engaged in agriculture with crop farming dominating albeit poultry is the dominant livestock reared in the district. 75 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.4.4 Profile of Savelugu-Nanton Municipality With a total population of 1,596,159 and a total land area of 1, 760square kilometres, Savelgu-Nanton municipality is predominantly a rural area with 60% of its population being rural and 40 % urban (GHS, 2014). The population has almost equal proportions of males and females: 48% males compared with 52% females. Akin to the national population, the municipality has a large youthful population, who are predisposed to migrate. Islam is (95.4%) is the dominant religion. More than half (60%) of the population aged 12 years and above are married whilst 33% have never been married (GSS, 2013). The Census Report also revealed that 59% of the population in the municipality who are 3 years and above have never attended school. The report further indicated that 31 % of the population who are II years and above are literate whilst 69% have never received any form of formal education (GSS, 2014). The data further shows that more than half of the population in the municipality lack the requisite expertise to work in the formal sector of the economy and may resort to migration. The municipality has a total Fertility Rate of 4.3, which is above the national average. The General Fertility Rate of the municipality is 126.7 births per 1000. Regarding under-5 mortality, Savelugu-Nanton District experienced the highest death rates (149 per 1,000 live births) in the region. In terms of healthcare delivery, the district has a municipal hospital as the main referral health facility. Other health centres and CHPS compounds complement the district hospital in service delivery. 3.5 Study PopUlation The population for this study included postnatal women aged 15-49 years who have had interactions with the formal health system for ANC, delivery or postnatal care. The study popUlation also included health workers such as midwives. doctors and administrators in 76 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh selected health facilities. Experts and! or policy makers from Ghana Health Service and the Ministry of Health, university lecturers in the field of maternal heaJthcare service as well as other development partners in maternal and child health such as the National Population Council of Ghana, USAID and UNICEF were interviewed. 3.5.1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria Since the study was measuring quaJity of maternal healthcare comprising ANC, delivery and postnatal, only women who had experienced facility delivery and attended postnatal clinics were recruited into this study. Only women with live birth were included. Women who experienced still-births during their most recent pregnancy were excluded because they may be experiencing emotional distress. Interviewing people going through grieving process has been reported to increase their pain and may affect the quality of data provided (Rosenblatt, 1995). For healthcare providers, the study included only those with at least three years of experience in the provision of maternal healthcare services to women. Hence, those with working experience of less than three years were excluded. The reason for excluding of healthcare workers who had working experience of less than three years was to recruit only workers who had sufficient engagement with women seeking antenatal and postnatal care services and had adequate relevant knowledge of the fonnal healthcare system. Thus, professional nurses and doctors who worked at the maternity units and who directly met clients seeking ANC, delivery and postnatal care services were included in the study. 3.6 The Qualitative study The qualitative component of this study combined descriptive phenomenology with narrative qualitative enquiry. Descriptive phenomenology is used to gain an understanding of the meaning of a phenomenon of interest through in-depth engagement using various 77 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh qualitative data collection strategies (Laverty, 2003; Lopez & Willis, 2004). This approach allows researchers to collect detailed data on a particular phenomenon of interest in this case, quality of maternal healthcare to gain deeper insight about the situation (Creswell, 1998; Green & Thorogood, 2004). This approach is relevant in studies that try to better understand a phenomenon through engagement with participants who have experienced that phenomenon as well as people who may have understanding of the phenomenon through their engagement with it (Green & Thorogood, 2004). In this study, postnatal women were recruited for interview. In addition, midwives, nurses and doctors who have had contacts with women seeking care along the maternal healthcare continuum were also recruited into the study. Narrative qualitative inquiry study allows participants in a study to share their experiences on a given situation or on a research topic of interest (Andrews & Tamboukou, 2013). In this case, the study participants had the opportunity to share with the researcher their beliefs and perceptions about quality of maternal healthcare based on their knowledge and personal experiences. 3.6.1 Sample Size for the qualitative research In qualitative studies, sample sizes are not large compared to quantitative studies. Rather, in qualitative research, recruitment stops when saturation occurs (no new information is emerging from data) and themes are fully developed (Morgan, 1998). The reason is that the main purpose of qualitative research is not to present what is representative of the wider population of interest but rather to reach a much in-depth understanding of the phenomenon under investigation. In this study the aim was to have a h l' ti' • , 0 IS C perspective of women's and healthcare workers' understanding of what constitute quality of maternal care and how it should be assessed in Ghana. Generally satur t' f th , a Ion 0 emes was reached 78 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh in this study after 92 participants made up of 85 women and 7 healthcare providers were engaged in both FGDs and IDIs (Morgan, 1998). Saturation was reached for each question for the 92 participants after no new information was emerging from each of the questions. 3.6.2 Sampling and recruitment procedures into the qualitative study Purposive sampling methods were used to recruit participants into the qualitative arm of the study. This is a popular sampling method often used in qualitative research (Cannella et al, 2005; Silverman, 2013). In purposive sampling, the investigator guarantees that the participants being recruited have the desired experiences or knowledge. Purposive sampling techniques were used to sample women and healthcare providers including midwives, nurses and doctors who had three or more years of working experience at the maternity and childcare department. Recruitment refers to the actual processes undertaken to reach and gain the consent of women and healthcare providers who met the inclusion criteria. It is important to point out that access to a field environment does not guarantee successful recruitment of participants as they may refuse to participate in a given research even though ethical and administrative approval for the research may have been given (Parfitt, 1996). Incentives given to participants have been criticized by some researchers as having the potential to induce participants and potentially introduce biases into the outcomes of a study (Parfitt,1996; Cannella et ai, 2005). Cognizant of this, no incentives were offered to potential participants during the recruitment process in this study. A few procedures were followed to recruit participants. Letters of introduction were provided by the School of Public Health to be given to selected health facilities and community leaders. The letters contained brief infonnation about the purpose of the study and as well introduced the principal investigator and her research assistants. Once permission was obtained from 79 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh health facility managers and community leaders, information leaflets about the research were provided at each selected health facility and in the communities. Midwives and nurses also made regular announcements at postnatal care clinics about the study. This strategy was particularly important given the relatively-high rates of illiteracy in the study districts. Women who were interested in participating were asked to contact the research assistants. For the healthcare providers, introductory letters were written to each of them inviting them to participate in the study. The invitation was effected after their respective institutions gave clearance for the conduct of the study. Those who expressed interest in the study were recruited and subsequently interviewed. 3.6.3 Qualitative Data Collection methods and tools The choice of data collection methods was informed by a need to explore and understand participants' experiences, meanings and overall worldviews; therefore, face-to-face in- depth qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted. These data collection methods helped to gather data that responded appropriately to the research questions. As Bryman (2008:238) argued, through face-to-face qualitative interviews, "a unique. subjective, detailed personal story can be told as to how the interviewees understand and explain various phenomena, their actions and their general overview of the world around them". The two qualitative data collection methods and tools are elaborated below. 3.6.3.1 In-depth Interviews From a life history perspective, in-depth interviews can give rich information on personal experience and ideology as well as on social structures and institutions (Leckenby & 80 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Plummer, 1983). In an in-depth interview, the ~esearcher sets the agenda in tenns of the topics covered but the interviewee's responses detennine the kinds of infonnation produced about those topics and the relative importance of each of them (Creswell & Garrett, 2008). With this approach, participants had the opportunity to situate their own life experiences within the larger social context. While some researchers argue that personal reflections may not be fully accurate, others assert that the strength of telling one's own story rests precisely in this interaction between the participant and hislher past self (Green & Thorogood, 2004). In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with selected postnatal women to explore their views on what constituted quality of care and their experiences of facility-based childbirth care. IDIs were also conducted with healthcare providers of different calibres (e.g. nurses, midwives and medical officers) working in the selected facilities to explore their views on what constituted quality maternal healthcare and how it should be measured. In all, 46 lOIs were conducted with 39 postnatal women and 7 healthcare workers. Table 3 shows the distribution of participants that were individually interviewed. Table 3: Distribution ofiDI Participants by district Tamale Metropolis Sagnarigu Total Participant Categories Postnatal women 24 IS 39 Healtbcare workers Doctors 2 0 2 Nurses I 2 Midwives 2 3 Sub-total 5 2 7 Total 29 17 46 In tenus of the data collection instrument, an unstructured thematic interview guide was designed by the researcher based on e xtensi'v 0 e 1lteratl.U"e reVoiew on. m dicators of quality of m....a..t e~rn .•a•l• h__e_a l._th_c__a_re_ . T.he. gu,ide was desif.>-.U."AU m0 EnglI' Sh . b ut the questi0 ons were translated 81 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh into and asked in Dagbani, the vernacular for those who could not speak English and there was back- to- back translation in order to ensure meaning was not lost. For the healthcare providers as well as women who could speak English, the interviews were conducted in English. The tool covered a wide range of issues that included what should constitute quality and how it should be measured. It also took into consideration the Donabedian structural, process and outcome dimensions for measuring quality of healthcare. Each interview lasted approximately 60 minutes. Generally, each interview ended when data saturation on all major themes was attained. Interviews were conducted by trained research assistants who were fluent in English and the Dagbani. In cases pennission was obtained, all interviews were audio-recorded with a digital voice recorder. Fieldnotes were taken in addition. 3.6.3.2 Focus Group Discussions Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with women to further explore the research topic. The focus group method is a type of interview that comprises several people on specific issues, topics or subjects. Bryman (2008: 345) argued that an FGD is "essentially a group interview" as it involves more than one person and, usually, at least four persons. FGDs were used because they are a valuable method for generating data on how a group of people in this case, women communally make sense of an issue. It is useful for developing consensus and convergence on issues in a meaningful manner. Thus, in the focus group discussions, the researcher was interested in such issues as how people responded to one another's views and build up a view out of the interactions that took place within the group (see also Bryrnan 2008 :346). In total, six (6) FGDs three in each of the two study districts for the qualitative study comprising a total of 46 women were conducted with stnatal po women between the ages 12 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh of 15 and 49 years who had experienced ANC, facility delivery or attended postnatal clinic in a facility during their most recent pregnancy. Although the populations in both Tamale metropolis and Sagnarigu are different, the researcher decided to recruit an equal number of respondents for the study since these two local districts recorded the highest number of antenatal registrants. Qualitative study does not usually involve huge numbers and since the selected districts had similar characteristics, the researcher did not see the need to undertake the qualitative studies in all the four districts. These women were different from those who participated in the lOIs. However, they shared similar characteristics. Women were segmented into three groups: women aged 15-24 years, 25-34 years and above 34 years (see Table 4). Table 4: Distribution of Focus Group Discussants by Age group and district Tamale Age Group Metropolis Sagnarigu Total 15-24 7 6 13 25-34 8 8 16 >34 9 8 17 Total 24 22 46 Each group was carefully constituted to include a mix of participants from different social backgrounds who may not know one another (that is, women from different religious backgrounds and socio-economic classes). Women were segmented into different age- groups not only because the researcher wanted to highlight the differences in opinions concerning what constituted quality of maternal healthcare but also because it was to ensure that age-hierarchy conflicts did not prevent younger women from talking in the presence of older women. The number of discussants in groups ranged from 6 to 9. This number allowed broad latitude for participants' views to be explored in breadth and depth, a very important feature of qualitative research (Bryman, 2008). 13 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Like the in-depth interviews, a focus group guide was designed and used to facilitate discussions in the groups. The guide explored such issues as what should constitute quality and how it should be measured. Discussions in each group lasted 60 - 90 minutes and were conducted by one moderator (teacher) and note-taker (teacher). Discussions in each group were usually ended when data saturation on all major themes was attained. Discussions were conducted in Dagbani. With the pennission of discussants, all group discussions were audio-recorded with a digital voice recorder. Fieldnotes were taken in addition. 3.6.4 Data Quality Assurance The quality of a qualitative research is safeguarded by following key ethics of rigour/trustworthiness. This requirement, therefore, implies that results of any research that does not apply rigour in ensuring quality cannot be reliable and the phenomenon under study becomes distorted (Cho & Trent, 2006). In this research, the principles of ensuring credibility during data collection and analysis enumerated by Patton (1999) were followed. The significant principles of rigour in qualitative research are credibility by ensuring findings can be trusted; transferability by ensuring results can be compared with a similar context, dependability by ensuring that similar results can be obtained when repeated and confinnability by ensuring results can be validated by others (Talbot, 1995; De Vos et al., 2013). To ensure rigour in the study, first, mUltiple data collection methods such as the in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were undertaken to enable this research to answer the objectives of the study. Thus, the credibility of the research was ensured using multiple data collection methods (Creswell, 1998; Mason, 2006). 84 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Second, pretesting was undertaken to ensure that questions in the interview guide elicited appropriate responses, thus ensuring credibility of the study results. Further, credibility was ensured by the research team by reviewing the data and coding it. Variations between coded data were discussed and rectified. Finally, the research assistants received a one- week intensive training at a workshop, where they were trained to appropriately ask questions as well as take infonned consent. 3.6.5 Qualitative Data Analysis All qualitative data generated from FGDs and lOIs were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim in the original language (Dagbani). Transcription was perfonned immediately after the IDlslFGDs were completed before the next batch ofinterviews. Observations and assessments during interviews were written up as field notes to complement these transcripts. The transcripts in the local language were translated into English by two independent translators and the transcripts compared for consistency. All translated transcripts underwent another round of consistency check by a language expert to ensure data quality. Thematic content analysis was employed in the analysis of the data with the aid of NVivo 10 software. Guest, MacQueen & Namey (2012) have summarized the process of thematic analysis as consisting of reading through textual data, identifying themes in the data coding those themes and then, interpreting the structure and content of the themes. Following the steps outlined by Guest, MacQueen & Namey (2012) for thematic content analysis, data generated from the field were analyzed. Descriptive and reflexive notes were derived during the reading of transcripts. The notes included unique words, the context of the comments, the frequency of comments, whether comments were extensive and how participants comments were consistent or influenced by other participants (Watt 85 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh et aI., 2005; Koopman-Esseboom et al., 1994; Motlagh et al., 2018). This exercise included manual process; therefore, meaning was derived from the field data and themes were initially organized before transferring the data into NVivo 10. Codes were then assigned to segments of the text and comparable codes grouped together. Sifting of data was done and it was separated into free nodes and tree nodes. Free nodes included data that were not related to the research objectives but were retained. Tree nodes consisted of data that directly related to the objectives of the research. (Burnard, 1991; Morse & Field, 1995). As the analysis advanced, minor categories were grouped and later they were all incorporated into major themes by re-grouping and breaking up similar minor themes (Burnard, 1991). The research questions guided various stages in the progression of analysis. Descriptive terms were later allocated themes and abstract terms assigned. 3.7 The Quantitative Study The quantitative component of the study was a cross-sectional study, whereby a randomly selected sample of postnatal mothers as well as maternal healthcare experts were selected and surveyed. From this sub-sample, data were collected at one point in time to help gain inference about the general population of childbearing women or maternal healthcare experts (Bowling, 2014). Thus, a cross-section of experts in reproductive healthcare were first recruited to validate the tool for measuring maternal healthcare quality, which was developed from the qualitative aspect of the study. After the validation of the tool, a cross- section of postnatal women was recruited and surveyed to assess the quality of the maternal healthcare they received during the most recent pregnancy in Northern Region of Ghana. 86 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.7.1 Development of Quantitative Tool for Quality of Care Assessment The first part of the quantitative arm of the study involved the development of a quantitative tool for quality of maternal healthcare assessment. The tool was based primarily on the findings from the qualitative component of this research, although relevant guidelines were drawn from previous literature. The tool covered areas such as perspectives on quality of maternal healthcare amongst clients, service providers and various stakeholders. These issues also covered various aspects of maternal healthcare from antenatal to the post-natal period and included the various dimensions of care provided during this period taking into consideration the Donabedian model. Several stages and processes were followed to develop and validate the quantitative tool for measuring maternal healthcare quality as described below. 3.7.1.1 Domain identification and item generation The first stage of the tool development started with domain identification and item generation. Through literature, the researcher first identified key areas and items that needed to be considered when assessing quality of care. After the identification of these key areas and principles of quality of care, several qualitative interviews in the form of lOIs and FGDs were conducted to solicit more ideas to establish how the escape already identified items would be relevant to the Ghanaian setting. At the end of this process, 57 Likert-type questions/items were formulated and classified into 13 domains. All items were rated on a scale of 1 to 5 (where I =Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Undecided, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly agree). 3.7.1.2 Content validation 10 order to check the suitability and appropriateness of the initially proposed 57 questions on quality of maternal care, the content validity of the tool was assessed. Fifty-five (55) 87 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh maternal and child health experts were purposively selected to assess each item for clarity and relevance on the 5-point Likert scale (where, 1= Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Undecided, 4=Agree and 5=Strongly agree). The experts were asked to assess the 57- items to ensure that the content adequately measured quality of maternal healthcare. Item- level Content Validation Index (CVI) and overall content validity score were then estimated. According to the CVI index, a rating of four (agree) or five (strongly agree) indicated that the content was valid and consistent with the conceptual framework. The clarity and conciseness of each item as well as completeness of the construct were also assessed by the experts. An item was retained in the construct if it had high interpretability and low ambiguity, was not a double-barrelled item that is, two issues were not combined in the same item. did not involve the use of slangs or jargons and did not mix positive and negative issues (DeVellis. 2017). To measure suitability quantitatively, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was computed for each item in the construct. Based on the formula propounded by Kyriazos and Stalikas (2018), Content Validity Index (CVI) was mathematically computed as follows: N CVl=~ 2 Where, n1 = number of experts who rated an item either strongly agree or agree N = total number of raters The minimum required CVI cut off for each item was set at 0.60. All items which fell short of the value within a margin of 0.1 were modified per the suggestions of the experts and retained; otherwise they were discarded from the tool. The revised tool comprised 57 items across the 13 domains. 88 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.7.1.3 Pretest oftbe tool After the questions had been modified according to the suggestions of the experts, there was pre-testing to ensure that the 57 items were meaningful to the target population before the actual survey was conducted. This pretest was done to minimize misunderstanding. It was also meant to check the suitability of wording of the questions and to reduce the cognitive burden on research participants (Boateng, et al., 2018). The pretesting was conducted by administering the questionnaire to 50 randomly sampled postnatal women in the regional hospital of Upper East Region of Ghana to evaluate whether the structure, questions and response formats of the tool were understood and were measuring what it intended to measure before the main study. After completing the pilot study, the data was entered into the ST AT A software and analyzed. Afterwards, the same women were resampled and interviewed again using the same questionnaire. These interviews were conducted by the Principal Investigator with the assistance of trained research assistants. The test-retest stability of the scales, as measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient, was then used to assess the reliability of the tool. 3.7.1.4 Toollengtb optimization and item reduction In order not to overpopulate a study tool with questions, there is a need to always check that there are no set of questions soliciting for the same information and to ensure that only effective and functional items are maintained in the final tool. This exercise is done through the questionnaire item reduction (questionnaire length optimization) procedure. To achieve this, the following activities were carried out. First, the ability of individual items to correlate with one another (i.e. polychoric correlation co-efficient) was assessed and any items which did not correlate well with others was dropped from the scale (Kyriazos & Stalikas, 2018). A polychoric correlation co-efficient was used to assess the 89 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh correlation between items in each construct (Ekstrom, 2011). Items with correlation coefficients of~ 0.3 were desirable while those with values < 0.3 (at most) were discarded (Kyriazos & Stalikas, 2018). As shown later in Chapter Five of this study, all proposed 57 items correlated well and were thus retained. Second, to ensure that each question (item) could discriminate between cases that would grade quality of care as either low, moderate or high, the Item Response Theory (IRT) model was used in estimating the discrimination indices of the items of the construct. Specifically, items with statistically significant index (p <0.05) were retained; otherwise they were dropped from the construct (Abel, 2016; Boateng et aI., 2018; Kyriazos & Stalikas. 2018). As shown later in chapter five, ten items were dropped from the scale for not meeting this criterion (p < 0.05). The 47 items were retained to form the final construct with 13 domains. 3.7.2 The quantitative survey design and data collection The second component of the quantitative study arm aimed to assess the quality of maternal healthcare services women received during their most recent pregnancy. A cross- sectional survey design was therefore employed. A cross-sectional survey is a type of study where a subset of a population is selected and data are collected to help answer research questions of interest at a given point in time (Rindfleisch et aI., 2008). In this phase a cross section of postnatal women was selected and the validated tool was used to assess the maternal health quality in Northern Region. 3.7.1.1 Determination of sample size for the Survey The quantitative survey comprised postnatal women aged 15-49 years who had had encounters with the formal health system for ANC, delivery or post-natal care. To estimate 90 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh a minimum sample size that would allow statistical associations between the outcome and exposure variables to be detected if they existed, Kasiulevi~ius, Sapoka and Fi1ipavi~iUte's (2006) formula for determining sample size in a cross-sectional survey with categorical outcome was used. The formula is denoted as follows: where: n = minimum required samples size Z1 -ah = the standard normal variate at 5% significance level = 1.96 P = expected proportion of the sample who would rate quality of care high since no previous study had reported on this issue in Ghana, it was assumed that the proportion of women who would rate the quality of maternal healthcare they received during their most recent pregnancy high was 50% (i.e. p=0.50) e= margin of error; which was assumed to be 5%. DefJ = design effect The design effect was considered since the sampling technique that was used in this study is multi-stage. The sample size had to be adjusted to cater for the design effect. The design effect is defined as the ratio of the variance when a complex sample design is used to the variance that would be expected for a simple random sample of the same size (Bowling, 2014). This effect was calculated as DEFF = 1 + (m - 1) r (2) where • m = number of elements selected in each cluster; • r = intra-class (or intra-cluster) correlation coefficient, dermed as r = sc2/(s2 + sc2); (or the ratio of between- cluster variability to total variability) (Som, 1973). 91 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Using this fonnula, a design effect of 1.35 was estimated. n 2 1.96 xO.S (1-0.5) X 1.35 = 519.6 0.052 n.",S20 3.7.2.2 Sampling Technique for quantitative Survey After the selection of the four study districts described earlier in this chapter, sampling of respondents for the quantitative survey started with selection of health facilities. A multi- stage sampling technique was used to select facilities and respondents. At each district level, all health facilities rendering postnatal care services were listed and four of these facilities were randomly selected. While the sample size of 520 was equally divided among the four districts giving 130 respondents per study district. The allocation of the number of women to be interviewed among the 16 selected health facilities was detennined in proportion to the respective sizes of the populations of postnatal women. Table 5 shows the districts and the selected health facilities that were included in this study. Table 5: Districts and selected health facilities Tamale Metropolis Sagnarigu District Savelugu District (N=130) Kumbungu Distrct (N=130) (N=130) (N=130) Tamale West Taha Health Centre Savelugu Government Kumbungu Health Hospital (n=33 ). (n=33 ). Hospital (n=33 )* Centre (n=33 ). Tamale Central Fuo Community Health JK Health Centre- Nanton Mbanaayili Health Hospital (n= 33). Centre (n= 32)** (n=32 )* Centre (n=32 )* Moshie-Zongo KaIpohin Health Moglaa Health Centre Health Centre (n= Kings Village Medical cCentre (n= 33)* (n=32 )* 32)· Centre (n=33 )*** Vittin Health Centre Kanvili Health Centre Diari Health Centre (n= (n= 32)* (n= 32)* Vogu Health Centre 32)* (n= 32)* Nota: *Govemment health facility; "Partly government and partly private facility; 92 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh In terms of sampling, a systematic sampling approach was used to select the respondents within each health facility. In the systematic sampling, a sample interval was calculated for each facility by dividing the sample to be selected over the total estimated eligible population of postnatal care attendants for that facility. For example, if a facility had 60 postnatal care registrants who met the study's inclusion criteria and 30 respondents had to be selected for the study, 60 was divided by 30 to get the sampling interval, which in this case was 2. At each facility. a list of eligible respondents was compiled and numbered starting at 0 I. A random starting number was then determined using a google-based electronic random number generator. Using the respective sampling interval for each facility, the required number was number of respondents was then systematically selected. For instance, if sampling interval for a facility was 2 and the random starting number was determined to be 01, then respondent numbers 03, then OS, 07 and so on were selected until the required sample size for that health facility was attained. All the selected participants were then approached on their various postnatal clinic days to participate in the study. 3.7.2.3 Quantitative Data Collection methods and tools The survey approach was used to collect data. The data collection tool was a fully structured questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire aimed to collect socio- demographic infonnation on each respondent. The second part collected infonnation on maternal and obstetric characteristics of respondents. The third part of the questionnaire aimed to assess the quality of maternal healthcare services women received during their most recent pregnancy. The 57-item tool that was developed and validated based on the qualitative research described earlier constituted the questions for the third part of the questionnaire. 93 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The questionnaire was designed in English and administered to respondents in two different ways. Respondents who could speak and write English, were given copies of the questionnaires to them to self-complete and return to research assistants. However, in respect of respondents who could not speak and write English, the questions were translated into Dagbani, vernacular. The questionnaire was administered to such respondents by trained research assistants who were fluent in both English and Dagbani. 3.7.2.4 Data Quality Assurance At each study site, a trained research assistant for a given facility assisted the Principal Investigator in data collection. All the research assistants who took part in the data collection process were trained teachers and nutritionist working in the Northern Region. The selection of the research assistants was based on their ability to speak the local language of the respondents and their level of education. Prior to data collection, a one- week training session was conducted for all the research assistants. The training session included explanation of the objectives of the study, data collection procedures, practice sessions with the tools as well as ethical, safety and confidentiality considerations. During data collection, 20 respondents who had been interviewed by research assistants were re-sampled and interviewed by the PI to compare responses. At the end of the validation exercise, a comparison analysis was carried out, but no disparities were recorded or observed. The Principal Investigator (PI) also conducted one monitoring visit per site during the data collection period. 3.7.2.5 Data processing Data collection was done with Research and Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software and exported into STATA version 13 for cleaning and analysis. Data validity was cross- 94 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh checked by running basic statistics of each variable to identify outliers and wrong entries after each field day's work and identified errors were corrected after cross-checking from the research assistant in charge. In addition, random cross-checks were made to ensure that entered data corresponded with the right respondents by comparing the data with the printed questionnaire. 3.7.2.6 Variables and measurements Two main variables were considered in this study: outcome and independent variables. The outcome variable was quality 0/ maternal healthcare. This variable was measured using the validated tool developed by the researcher in the second phase of this research work. The tool comprised 47 Likert-scale items categorized into 13 domains (with responses rated I - (Strongly disagree) to 5 - (Strongly agree). In this study, the levels of rating were explained to the participants using the descriptions of a ladder. So, the higher the step on the ladder, the higher the rating and the better the quality of service received. As explained earlier, each of the 13 domains had a specific number of items: health facility domain 3 items; inter-personal relationship domain - 10 items; privacy domain - 3 items; amenities domain - 3 items; range of services domain - 3 items; the human resource domain 6 items; environment domain - 2 items, safety domain - 2 items; logistics and supplies - 3 items; pain management domain - 1 item; clients' satisfaction domain 7 items; health insurance domain 2 items; and outcome domain 2 items. Responses to each item were rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with I indicating lowest quality rating and 5 being the highest. Additive or average scores were then generated for each of the domains and followed by a composite or overall quality of care score, which was generated by finding the average of ail the 47 items in the construct The average scores ranged from 1 to S. The overall quality of maternaI heaIthcare as well as the individual domains was each 9S University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh categorized into low (average score of 1.0 - 2.0), moderate (average score of 2.1 - 3.9) and high (average score of 4.0 - 5.0). The explanatory/independent variables studied and their measurements are shown in Table6. University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 6: Independent variables and their measurements Variable Type Scale of Level measurement Socio-demographic Age of respondents as at last Quantitative Continuous birthday in completed years Number of times pregnant as at Quantitative Count the time of the survey Number of deliveries as at the Quantitative Count time of the survey Health facility type Categorical Nominal Public Private District Categorical Nominal Tamale Metro Sagnarigu Kwnbungu Savelugu Residence type Categorical Dichotomous Urban Rural Marital status Categorical Nominal Never in union (Single) Currently in union (Married /Cohabiting) Formerly in union (Divorce, Separated / Widow) Educational level Categorical Ordinal None; Primary; Secondary Tertiary Religion Categorical Nominal Traditional and others; Christianity Islam Tribe Categorical Nominal Dagomba; Mamprusi; Bimoba Kusaasi Socio-economic Categorical Nominal Occupation Farmer; Trader; Housewife; Community factors Civil; Student; Artisan Household decision-maker Categorical Nominal Self; In-Iaws/ co-wives Transportation issues Husband Categorical Ordinal Do not have to worry at all I worry some of the time I worry most of the time Distance to health facility I worry all the time Categorical Ordinal < 30 mins walking distance 30 mins - I-hour 1.1 - 2 hours 2.1 - 3 hours > 3 hours Means of transportation Categorical Ordinal By walking By bicycle/tricycle, motor bike By car 97 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 6: Continuation Variable Type Scale of Level measurement Access Availability of health facility Categorical Dichotomous Yes; No Distance to health facility Quantitative Ordinal < 30 mins walking distance 30 mins - I-hour 1.1 - 2 hours 2.1 - 3 hours > 3 hours Waiting time at health facility Quantitative Ordinal < 30 mins 30 mins - 1 hour 1.1 - 2 hours 2.1 - 3 hours > 3 hours Obstetric factors Parity Quantitative Count Gravida Quantitative Count 3.7.2.7 Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistical analyses were first done to describe respondent's important demographic and maternal health characteristics. To assess quality of maternal healthcare women received during their most recent pregnancy, mean quality of care scores were obtained for each domain by adding the scores for individual items and dividing the results by the number of items in each domain. Based on this score for each domain, the quality of care under each domain was then re-categorized into three scales, where a mean score of 1.0 - 2.0 meant low quality; mean score of 2.1 - 3.9 meant moderate quality; and mean score of 4-5 meant high quality. Percentage distribution tables were then constructed to show the proportions of respondents who rated the quality of care they received as either low, moderate or high. 98 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.8 Ethical considerations 3.8.1 Ethical approval The protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Ghana Health Service (GHS) which is mandated to undertake ethical review of research involving healthcare facilities in Ghana. The study was therefore conducted only after the protocol received approval from GHS indicating Protocol ID Number GHSERC:Olll1l2020 3.8.2 Administrative Approval Following the approval by the Ghana Health Service Ethical Review Committee, introductory letters were sent to the selected facilities in the study districts to seek approval before the commencement of the study. All facilities gave their approval. 3.8.3 Informed consent All potential participants and respondents received information about the study in Dagbani or English. The information was easy to understand and free of technical jargon. Participants were given enough time to reflect on the information and ask questions. Those who gave their consent to participate in the study were requested to sign a consent form before participating in it. For participants who could not read, the information was read to them in Dagbani they understood, after which they were required to thumbprint as an indication of acceptance to participate in the study. Even though an assent form was available for participants who may be under the age of 18 years, none of the women interviewed was below that age. 99 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.8.4 Confidentiality and Privacy All participants and respondents were assured of their privacy and non-disclosure of their identities in the dissemination of ftndings of this study. This assurance was provided by assigning ID numbers to the various participants. 3.8.5 Right of withdrawal It was made clear to participants in the qualitative study and respondents in the survey that they were free to withdraw from the study at any stage without risk of any negative consequences to them. However, no participant withdrew from the study. Participants and respondents who travelled to participate in any component of the study were fully reimbursed for travel expenditure. 3.8.6 Risks and Benefits There were no obvious risks to participants. However, it was possible that women who had either experienced maltreatment during ANC and childbirth or a traumatic birth experience could have felt more distressed during interviews. Interviewers were trained on how to provide support to any woman who became upset during the interview, including how to initiate and follow up on referral to appropriate sections of the hospital where the woman could receive psychological support. While there were no immediate direct benefits for participating in this study, it was explained to participants and respondents that their views and responses as regards what constituted quality maternal healthcare and how it should be measured could help improve the quality of maternal healthcare women receive during pregnancy in Northern Region and other parts of Ghana in the long term. 100 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.S.7 Data Storage and Use The data collected was used solely for the research purposes and people who were not involved in this study did not have access to it. Both the voice recordings and transcripts will be kept under lock and key for 5 years. 3.9 Same gender- interviewing: ethics and reflexivity Edwards (1990:482) explained that "characteristics such as class, sex and race belong not just to the people who we conduct our research on or about but are also characteristics of the researcher". Therefore, I recognized my characteristics as a female researcher and a mother from the study area researching into women's perspectives of quality of maternal healthcare and how it should be assessed in Ghana were likely to have had effects on the data collection process and the outcome thereof. The question whether it was difficult to understand women's experiences related to maternal healthcare was irrelevant. The reason was that whereas it could have been difficult for a man to emotionally show some understanding of these women as they related their experiences of bad interpersonal relationship with some health personnel, it was rather easy for me since I could identify with their perspectives. This characteristic, thus, gives credence to Bryman's (2008: 438) view that qualitative research interview is not just an instrument for collecting data but that it is an interactive process that is two directional. During the focus group discussions, a woman remarked "she is a mother, therefore, she would understand us better". This statement, certainly, reinforced the view that in order to be successful, the interview process must have all the warmth and personality exchange of a conversation with the clarity and guidelines of scientific searching" (Goode & Han, 1952: 191 in Roberts et al., 1981). 101 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh My code of dressing further identified me as part of them and my gender further ensured my acceptability. In this study area, where the majority of the population are Muslims, the research team made a conscious effort to maintain a moderate dress code for Babbie reminds us that "as a general rule, the interviewer should dress in a fashion fairly similar to that of the people she will be interviewing" (Babbie 1973, in Bailey, 1994). Babbie emphasized that richly-dressed interviewers will probably have difficulty getting co- operation and good responses from poorer respondents. Similarly, a poorly-dressed interviewer will have difficulties with richer respondents (Babbie 1973, 173, in Bailey, 1994). Thus, in this study, the code of dressing for both sexes emphasized moderation, which we believe had a positive influence on the data collection processes. Rapport was, thus, excellent although Hyman warns of too much of it (Hyman et aI., 1954, in Bailey, 1994). In the qualitative arm of the study, only female research assistants were used. These research assistants were themselves Muslims (teachers and nutritionists by profession) and always dressed strictly in line with the Islamic code. A male research assistant was however added to the team during the 520-participant. This research assistant was also a Muslim and his code of dressing was in accordance with that of the Islamic faith and the data collected was not affected in anyway. 3.10 Chapter summary In this chapter, the research methods have been discussed. The discussion was divided into three parts. The first part detailed the research design and its epistemologicaVphiiosophical underpinnings. The second part described the research setting, study population, estimation of the sample size, sampling procedure/technique, data collection methods and instruments, variables and measurements as well as data analysis methods. The third part discussed how issues of ethics were addressed in the study. In the next chapter, results of the qualitative study that was undertaken in phase one are presented. 102 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS: PERSPECTIVES ON QUALITY OF MATERNAL HEALTHCARE 4.1 Introduction This chapter presents results from the qualitative component of the study, which sought to address the first two objectives of the study. The first objective sought to investigate women's and maternal healthcare providers' understanding of what constitute quality maternal healthcare while the second was to assess women's and providers' perspectives on how quality of maternal healthcare should be measured in Ghana. The participants' socio-demographic characteristics are first presented followed by an exploration of participants' perspectives on quality of maternal healthcare and its measurement. 4.2 Participants' socio-demographic characteristics A total of 85 postnatal women participated in the qualitative interviews. Forty-six ofthem participated in the focus group discussions and 39 in the in-depth interviews. In addition to the women. 7 maternal healthcare service providers were interviewed. They consisted of 2 medical doctors, three midwives and 2 nurses. The women's selected socio-demographic characteristics are summarised in Table 7. 103 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh -85 Table 7: Partici ants'socio-demo ra hic characteristics RURAL,n(%) TOTAL, n(%) Variables Urban, n(%) Age 15 (35.71) 16 (37.21) 31 (36.47) 18-25 15 (35.71) 16 (37.21) 31 (36.47) 26-34 12 (28.57) II (25.58) 23 (27.06) 35-49 Marital status 0 Single 0 0 43 (100) 85 (100) Married 42 (100) Number of children 32 (76.19) 26 (60.47) 58 (68.24) 0-3 4-5 9 (21.43) 17 (39.53) 26 (30.59) 1(1.18) 6+ 1 (2.38) 0 Physiological state Antenatal Care 10 (23.81) 15 (34.88) 25 (29.41) 16 (18.82) Just delivered 9 (21.43) 7 (16.28) Postnatal Care 23 (54.76) 21 (48.84) 44 (51.76) Educationalle\'el 51 (60.00) None 21 (50) 30 (69.77) Primary 4 (9.52) 7 (16.28) 11(12.94) 16 (18.82) JHS 12 (28.57) 4 (9.3) SHS 5 (1 1.90) 1 (2.33) 6 (7.06) Post-Secondary 0(0) 12.33) 1(1.81) Occupation Unemployed II (26.19) 9 (20.93) 20 (23.53) Farmer 0(0) II (25.58) 11 (12.94) Hairdresser I (2.38) 0(0) I (1.18) Trader 26 (61.90) 17 (39.53) 43 (50.59) Tailor 4 (9.52) 5 (11.63) 9 (10.59) Teacher 0(0) 1(2.33) 1(1.18) Income per week (GUc) None II (26.19) 22 (51.16) 33 (38.82) I-50 12 (28.57) 16 (37.21) 28 (32.94) 51-100 7 (16.67) 2 (4.65) 9 (10.59) 101+ 12(28.57) 3 (6.98) 15 (17.65) Religion Muslim 41 (97.62) 43 (100) 84 (98.82) Christian 1(2.38) 0(0) 1(1.18) Facility type Hospital 42 (100) o CO) 42 (49.41) Health Centre o CO) 43 (100) 43 (50.59) TOTAL 42 (49_4) 43(50.6) 85 (100) Women aged 18-25 and 26-34 had similar proportions of 35.7% and 37.2% in both urban and rural locations respectively. All the women were married. Women with up to 3 children dominated the sample in both urban (76.1%) and rural (60.47%) areas. Sixty pen;ent oftbe samnle had nn MlI. .....n o:l, Trading was the dominant occupation (50.6%). A 104 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh higher proportion of women in the rural than in the urban areas had no income (51.16% as against 26.19%) while a higher proportion in the urban areas (28.57%) had weekly income of at least GHC 101.00. Almost all the women (98.82%) were Muslims. Hospitals and health centres were the only types of facilities attended by women in urban and rural areas respectively. 4.3 What Constitutes Quality Maternal Healtbcare: Women and Maternal Healtbcare Providers' Perspectives Findings from the qualitative interviews suggest that participants - that is, both healthcare providers and women - discussed quality maternal healthcare in terms of three main themes. The themes were good antenatal, labour/delivery and postnatal care services. 4.3.1 Good Antenatal Care (ANC) services Good antenatal care services emerged as the first theme that constituted good maternal healthcare. Participants argued that in order to have quality maternal healthcare services, good ANC is of top priority because it lays the foundation for safe delivery and for postnatal care. A good ANC process, according to the participants, provides both mother and the unborn baby with the necessary care to ensure their well-being as well as safe delivery. In laying emphasis on the importance of antenatal care, participants drew a sharp contrast between seeking care at the health facility during pregnancy and not seeking care at all. 'If you're just at home without seeking care at the health facility when you're pregnant, you won't be able to tell if all is well with you and your baby" (Woman, IDl, Rural) lOS University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh A woman in a rural community had this to say in respect of the importance of seeking care at the facility, using her past pregnancy experience ofa negative outcome: "With my first pregnancy, I wasn't going for antenatal care because we had no health centre here. Unfortunately, the liquor around the foetus was gelting smaller and 1 didn't know. 1 only got to know it because I foil very sick and was admitted at Tamale Teaching Hospital. Unfortunately, the baby died in my womb. I could have died too but luck was on my side. Now, my husband and I don't joke with antenatal care because if I had been going for it, the nurses would have been able to detect the problem early and even saved my child's life" (Woman, IDl Rural). The importance of obtaining antenatal care services was buttressed by healthcare providers as expressed by a nurse at a rural health facility: "It's important for women to come for antenatal services because we need to know both the unborn babies and the mother's health status to know whether there's any medical condition of the mother that might be transforred to the baby. We do many tests as well and then we take their medical history. Sometimes there are some families with medical history that may not be goodfor the children. So, when these women come, we're able to reduce the rate at which some sicknesses can attack the children" (Nurse, IDI, Rural). In terms of what constitutes quality ANC, five sub-themes emerged. The sub-themes included time and patience on the part of healthcare providers to listen to clients, availability of equipment and provision of medicines, and protection of mother and unborn baby's well-being. The two other sub-themes were education on general management of pregnancy and regular check-up and monitoring by the midwives. 4.3.1.1 Time and Patience on the part of healthcare providers to listen to clients The data suggest that most women interpreted quality of ANC to mean health providers having the patience to listen to clients' health problems and provide treatment for their health needs. This issue was raised by participants in both urban and rural settings as expressed in the following narratives: "For quality ofm aternal healtheare, I think it's when you go to the facility and ,they get time f?~ you and try to find out what your problem ;s and why you re at the /acI/zty that day. It's when they also try 10 solve your problemfor you" [Woman, IDI, Urban]. 106 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh One participant contributed to the discussion and had this to say: ''I'll say that quality care is when you're well taleen care ofa t the hospital by the doctors and nurses and they get the patience to listen to all your health worries without insulting you. That, to me, is quality care" (Woman, FGD, Rural) Many healthcare providers corroborated the women's views on what constituted quality care. They stressed that most women come to the facility not only to seek care but also for psychological counselling on matters relating to their marriages, specifically, their relations with their husbands: "Hmm! Sometimes too they come with some personal issues they want you to listen to. Especially when you ask questions like "what happened and you didn't do this?" Then, they would tell you a whole story and expect you to listen and say something. Well. we do listen to them especially when we realise that the person is so passionate ... Some of them talk and cry so you have to leave the rest and take them inside. Most often, the stories are about their husbands ,. (Nurse, IDI, Rural). 4.3.1.2 Availability and provision of medication Participants pointed out that a successful antenatal service should have the needed medication for its clients to easily assess for the protection of both mother and child against malaria and anaemia. Availability of medication within a health facility, according to the women, means it is well equipped and, hence, offer quality ANC services, which can contribute to good quality maternal healthcare. An FGD participant at an urban area pointed out that: "Quality antenatal care is when you get all your medicines that you need and you don't have to worry about how to get those medicines '" that's quality care" (Woman, FGD, Urban). Another participant from the rural area also corroborated the views expressed in the urban area: "Whenever you go to the health centre and nurses look after you well and after that you get some medication 10 lake home and lake so that your baby grows well and strong, then you can say that there 's quality antennal care" (Woman, FOD, rural), 107 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Many health providers too interpreted quality maternal healthcare as being able to provide all the care needed by pregnant women and this perception encompassed providing medications, having access to scans and managing complications during pregnancy to ensure safe delivery. A medical doctor emphasised the need to manage complications and to ensure the safety of both mother and baby as key components of quality maternal care: "What I think is quality maternal healthcare is to see a pregnant mother go through her pregnancy normally or have it managed adequately even if with complications and to be delivered safely of a healthy baby" [Doctor, 101, Urban]. A midwife at an urban facility added her views as follows: "What 1'1/ call quality care is when the health workers come together to take care of the clients' needs so that they have safe deliveries. It also means the hospital having modern equipment like scans and good laboratory systems to help in delivery ofg ood service ... that, to me, is quality care" (Midwife, ID 1, Urban). Another midwife at a rural facility expressed her views as follows: "If the women come and we're able to solve all their health problems and they get satisfied with our performance and we're also able to handle all other complications that arise, with a/l required machines available, then I'll say quality care is available at the health facility " (Midwife, IDI, rural). 4.3.1.3 Protection and provision of care for mother's and unborn baby's well-being The study found that women attending ANC would go to facilities that would ensure their own well-being and their unborn babies'. For many participants, quality care means the ability of service providers to provide the essential care for mother and baby during ANC visits. The narrative by an urban participant in the quotation below highlights what she thinks constitute quality maternal care: "Antenatal services that give us food supplements and monitor how our babi~s are faring, leading to both the mother and baby's well-being is what I consider as good antenatal service" [Woman, FGD, Urban]. 108 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh One rural participant also noted as follows: Obtaining antenatal care services at the health facility where immunization services are provided to protect our unborn babies and let them grow well and healthily is considered good antenatal care" (Woman, FGD, Rural) Many of the healthcare providers interviewed agreed with the women's perceptions of quality ANC services. A midwife at an urban facility indicated the need to provide all essential services such as weighing and monitoring the progress of the pregnancy and providing education on nutrition to ensure the safe delivery of the client: "Quality antenatal care is when a mother is pregnant and she's able to attend ANC to receive all the needed care such as weighing her. educating her on nutrition and monitoring the progress ofh er pregnancy until she is delivered of her baby successfully without any complications. However. if there are deaths. then it means the quality ofs ervice is bad" (Midwife. IDI. Urban), 4.3.1.4 Education on general management of pregnancy Another important factor that featured in quality ANC was the ability of healthcare providers to educate mothers on management of pregnancy to avoid pregnancy-related complications. Participants explained that general education on the importance of antenatal care services is vital so it should constitute the requirement for defining quality maternal care. This sub-theme was especially important for first-time mothers, Most of the participants indicated that quality ANC should have an educational package for ANC clients on the general management of pregnancy. This education should include the reasons for immunization, pregnancy food supplements, nutrition and management of pregnancy. The participants, thus, prefer to attend ANC clinics that offer such services. A woman in a rural area was emphatic about the importance of management of pregnancy education during ANC in the following narrative: "/ think that the provi~i,on ofi nformation during ANC so that my unborn baby gets ,the needed nutritIOn to grow well is one of the constituents of good quality maternal care. The nurses should also give us more information on I?re~ management and some food supplements. These are very important In quality maternal care services" (Woman, IDI, Rural), 109 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh An urban healthcare provider emphasized the need for women to be educated on pregnancy-related issues: "And education too; we need to educate the women to come to the hospital for delivery because some oft hem are still delivered at home. When you see some of them at the hospital, it could mean that they're in labour that have delayed and are afraid so they quickly rush to the hospital. Or, maybe the baby is dead or something. But ift hey know that (f they're delivered at the hospital, it is saft and they '/l have fewer complications, they will come. And it isn't good to take any local concoction when you're pregnant" (Midwjft, IDI. Urban). ".3.1.5 Regular check-ups and monitoring the unborn baby's growth The women did indicate that during the provision of antenatal services, each pregnant woman should be checked and monitored by a midwife and records taken into their various antenatal record books. This act, according to the women, will ultimately lead to delivery of healthy babies. A woman in a focus group discussion session stated what makes antenatal services good thus: "A good antenatal care service should comprise regular availability of services during which food supplements are provided. Regular ANC also oJfors the opportunity for a pregnant woman to be monitored by the midwife and progress of the pregnancy recorded. When this is done, you know your unborn baby is okay and healthy" (Woman, FGD, Urban). Some healthcare providers confirmed this view. For example, a midwife at an urban facility pointed out the kinds of services her facility offers to pregnant women to attract them to her facility. These services, according to her, should constitute good antenatal care: 'The women come for antenatal care services because ofw hat we offer them. We measure and monitor the progress of their unborn babies and the women the~elv~s. We give them pregnancy food supplements and some drugs when they re SICk. Therefore, good ANC services must have midwives who measure a~ ~onitor the progress of women and their unborn babies regularly. The midwives mus~ aI~o be able to oJfor the clients pregnancy food supplements and some medIcatIOns when they're sick" (Midwife. IDI. Urban). 110 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh A rural nurse agreed with the above perception: "Most pregnant women know that we offer good antenatal service to them and, for that matler, they come over to the facility. Some of the services we offer them include taking their records and giving them some pregnancy management lessons to keep both themselves and their unborn babies healthy. This also is an important component ofg ood antenatal care" (Nurse, IDI, Rural). 4.3.2 Good quality care during labour and delivery Participants discussed two sub-themes to explain quality care during labour and delivery. These sub-themes were the ability of the care regime to prevent and manage complications as well as ensuring the mother's and baby's safety during labour and delivery. These two aspects of quality care are explained below. 4.3.2.1 Prevention and management of complications during labour and delivery Participants indicated that quality maternal healthcare should ultimately produce a smooth delivery process without complications. According to the women, delivery without complications is the main reason for seeking care and, therefore, constitute an aspect of good quality maternal healthcare. A woman who was delivered at an urban facility made this point precisely: "I decided to come to the facility to be delivered because I want my baby girl to be delivered safely. I want to avoid any complications that I can '( handle" (Woman, IDI, Urban). Another new mother from an urban community had this to say: "I ~onsider my child's safety and mine very seriously and wouldn't risk being ~ellvered at home, where there aren't trained medical personnel to assist me ~n c~e of ~ny emergency. Provision of good quality maternal healthcare Implies babies should be delivered safely and without any complications" (Woman, lDI, Urban). 1,1 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh A new mother from a rural community expressed similar views as follows: "The traditional birth attendants are helpful but can't do so much in case you need blood or an operation so it's very important to come to the health facility and be delivered where you can be assured ofy our ~afety. Ther~fore, I consider the provision ofs ervices that ensure the safe dellvery of babIes an important component ofq uality care" (Woman, 101, Rural) For many healthcare providers, the capacity to manage pregnancy-related complications is indeed a key ingredient of quality maternal healthcare: "Having the capacity to manage complications is key in the definition of quality care. Some might have complications but you can manage them and they '/I still be delivered whether at term or not term" (Medical doctor, IDl Urban). 4.3.2.2 Mother and baby's safety during labour and delivery The second sub-theme, safety, emerged especially with frrst-time mothers. They indicated that since this was their first experience of pregnancy, they needed to seek care that would ensure their safe delivery. This perception was expressed clearly by a rural woman: "Getting the needed proftssional support to be delivered safely is one of the constituents of good maternal healthcare. I came here to be delivered since this was my first delivery and I was a bit scared to be delivered at home. Here, I got the support to be delivered safely" (Woman, 101, Rural). 4.3.3 Good postnatal care services Participants discussed the components of quality care during the postnatal period. The two key components mentioned were access to appropriate and timely immunization and access to appropriate general check-up to ensure babies' welfare. 4.3.3.1 Access to appropriate and timely immunization Immunization of babies, according to the women, was very important and should be a good indicator of quality maternal healthcare. Immunization was considered important for their babies as it protected them against infections such as poliomyelitis and measles. _n_ .... _-- -_! .. thAt they preferred facilities that offered their children 112 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh immunization services. The importance of immunization was emphasised by an urban woman: 'Nurses at health facilities encourage us to bring our children for them to administer very important injections that '1/ help keep our children safe from dangerous diseases. Access to these services is what I consider one of the maries ofq uality maternal care' (Woman, IDl Urban). A woman from a rural community expressed her views about immunization as follows: "This is my first delivelY and to ensure that the child is safe from all diseases, I often take her to the clinic for check-ups and to get some injections for her. We're told by the nurses during the delivery time that it's very important to bring back the babies for regular monitoring and injections. Good maternal care services should therefore ensure that babies are given the right immunization to enhance their health" (Woman, FGD, Rural.) 4.3.3.2 Access to appropriate general check-ups to ensure babies' welfare Participants indicated provision of regular check-ups and monitoring of their babies' development and growth as indicators of quality maternal heaIthcare. They further indicated that postnatal care offered them the opportunity to have their children checked regularly to ensure their growth and welfare, and hence, offered them the assurance of the children's safety. In the opinion of an urban woman: "Regular attendance for children to be weighed and given the necessary care, which we're told protects them against childhood diseases, is one of the important components of quality maternal healthcare. The nurses further say that if you give your child the injections, and he/she happens to get the disease, it won't be all that serious. This, I think, is good news" (Woman, FOD, Urban). A woman from a rural community echoed the urban woman's views this way: "I ta!'t my child often for postnatal care because I want him to be healthy all the tlme. The ~u~ses w.i11 also monitor him and see whether he's growing well or. not by we~ghmg him. o[te~ The nurses also have specific dates for us to brmg the c~lldren for Iryectzons against diseases that might threaten their ~owt~. I thmk offermg these services that ensure our children grow healthily IS an Important component of good quality maternal care" (Woman FGD R~. ' , 113 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 4.4 Measuring/Assessing Quality of Maternal Healtbcare: Women and Healtbcare Providers' perspectives The second objective of the study sought to understand how quality of maternal healthcare should be measured Thirteen indicators emerged as important for the assessment of quality of maternal care. The first set of indicators included proximity of health facilities to clients, availability of infrastructure and other amenities, availability of logistics including equipment and medicines and good environmental sanitation. The second set of indicators emphasized human resource/workforce, non-discriminatory provision of maternal healthcare services, range of services and inter-personal relationship. Privacy of clients, pain management and clients' involvement in the care decision-making process, mother and baby's safety, outcome of pregnancy and client's satisfaction are the last set of indicators. Among these 13 key indicators, mother and baby's safety and the outcome of pregnancy were the two dominant indicators health providers considered to be the most important. On the contrary. even though the outcome of pregnancy and safety were important to the women, inter-personal relationship and range of services were the two dominant indicators. 4.4.1 Proximity of health facilities to clients Proximity of health facilities to clients is a recurrent theme in the data in terms of assessing the quality of maternal healthcare in Ghana. Participants argued that health facilities in any given community should be close to women for optimum utilization of their services. Proximity of the healthcare facility was an important consideration in the choice of place for women to seek skilled maternal healthc are services. An urban woman highlighted the significance of proximity: 114 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh "The hospital is just close to where I live. I usually walkfrom the hou~e to the hospital. The distance makes it easier for me to carry my baby for him to be checked whenever he has fever. I bring him for weighting and to take some injections so he can stay healthy" (Woman, IDI, Urban). A participant in an FGD session in a rural community could not agree more with her urban counterpart's perception that proximity is an important indicator for accessing healthcare: "The health centre where I come for my regular antenatal check-up is actually very close to my home so I don't have to walk for a long distance since I'm highly pregnant and my husband has no other means oft ransport to take me to a very distant hospital. l therefore, just walkfor some minutes and am at the health centre" (Woman, FGD, Rural) Healthcare providers corroborated the women's report that proximity of health facilities influenced their utilisation of their services. A midwife from a rural facility corroborated the women' s view that distance to a health facility was an important consideration for assessing quality of maternal care: "We believe women come here because oft he proximity oft he health centre to the community. The centre is just within the community and it's just a walking distance for the women to come for antenatal and postnatal services" (Midwife. IDI, Rural). In view of the above perceptions that proximity was an important factor for women to seek maternal healthcare. both women and healthcare providers in both rural and urban communities were of the view that the availability of health facilities in close proximity to children's homes should be a key consideration in measuring quality of health care. A rural woman was of the opinion that proximity of health facilities to clients' homes was a good measure of quality of care because it could save costs of travelling long distances to seek care: "Fi:~t, ~o measure quality of ANC service, you look at how close the health faci/Ity IS to the community. Ifi t's far and we don 'I have Ihe money to travel to that place, it'll be a problem" [Woman, FGD, rural]. liS University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh An urban participant agreed with the rural woman's perception of the benefits of proximity of health facilities to clients' homes: "I think it's true to consider the issue of proximity in assessing quality of maternal healthcare because, even if a facility is well equipped and we don't have the means to travel to seek care there, what is the point? So, the closer it is to the user, the better" (Woman, IDJ. Urban). Healthcare providers perceived proximity of facilities to clients as an important indicator for assessing quality of maternal healthcare not only because it saves time and financial resources on the part of clients but also because it makes it easier for health providers to give of their best in terms of service provision. According to a rural nurse, proximity of facilities to health service providers deserves equal attention: "The health facility shouldn't be closer to only the clients but also the healthcare provider so that she/he is more accessible to the clients all the time. We have to travel all the way to come and attend to them and then travel back home, and because our homes are far, weren't available all the lime for emergency cases and this absence may result in the client suffering" (Nurse, IDI, Rural) 4.4.2 Availability of infrastructure and other amenities Participants indicated that measurement of quality of maternal healthcare should also be based on the availability of physical infrastructure and its associated amenities such as beds, enough spaces in labour wards, toilets and urinals at the health facility. In addition, these facilities according to the clients should be kept clean at all times. One woman could not hide her disaffection with the current poor status of certain amenities: "Space to ac~ommod~te all women in labour as well as the availability of enough beds IS very Important to consider when measuring quality of care. Currently, there aren '( enough beds to accommodate all of us in the ward and some women are sleeping on the floor and can easily gel infections. The washrooms 100 need regular clean-up before you can say there is quality maternal care" (Woman, IDI, urban). 116 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Indeed, many participants discussed the issue of toilets passionately. They say access to these facilities are very necessary and, therefore, saw them as necessary indicators for measuring quality of maternal healthcare. A participant in a focus group discussion session explained the importance of toilets thus: ''Toilets are very important in measuring quality of maternal healthcare. When we come for ANC, they ask us to bring urine and stool for examination, so the toilet should be clean for us to use. This requirement is very important for us as we can develop infections by using urinals or toilets that aren't clean" [Woman, FGD, urban]. Views from the focus group discussion in rural communities equally pointed out the importance of ensuring the availability of clean toilets at the facility. One rural woman supported her views of the need for decent toilets with an unreserved condemnation of the poor status of the toilets at the facility: "Toilets should be provided in the building ... that makes it a good health facility, but that isn't what we currently have in this health centre. The toilets here aren't functioning so we usually must go out somewhere to relieve ourselves and come back or wait for many hours before going home to be able to go to toilet. This can't be called quality and so it should be considered in the measurement" (Woman, FGD, rural) Another female FGD participant echoed the call to consider the calibre of ewaiting space and seating arrangements in an assessment of quality of care at a given facility: ''The health facility and where we attend the weighing for the children should be big enough and have more seats but this isn't the situation here, I have stood in the queue for a long time before getting a seat; even that seat wasn't good So, quality of healthcare should consider having enough seats for all clients" [Woman, FGD, urban]. Rural female IDI participants were equally convinced about the importance of seating space. Her assessment of the status-quo not less negative then that by FGD participants: ",There's the ~eed for health facilities to get more benches and chairs for us to ~" O~iffi~,,!:I'h~es'fiwe come, ~nd ~he benches are full so we must stand, which IS a UI ",,...t mg or us considenng our conditions" (Woman, ID/, Rural). 117 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Healthcare providers generally agreed on the need to consider infrastructure and amenities in assessing quality of maternal healthcare. They argued that providing enough seats and toilet facilities for clients is essential in improving quality of maternal healthcare services. "I think you should consider the space in the facility as an important indicator. There should be enough space for the clients. So, you think about the capacity. Jfyou want to cater for 30 patients you have to provide 30 beds. This way, the issue of over-crowding and its associated problems would be minimized. (Midw!fe, IDI. Urban). 4.4.3 Availability of logistics including equipment and medicines Women explained that availability of logistics including equipment (such as ultrasound machines, scans, X-rays and blood pressure apparatus) and consumables (such as hospital cards, cotton wool, sterilised pads, gloves, syringes and canola) to facilitate efficient rendering of health services in the facility should be used to measure quality of care. Drugs and essential medicines, blood and constant flow of water were other logistics that were deemed relevant for inclusion in the measurement of quality of care, According to them, availability of equipment and machinery is necessary for the delivery of quality of maternal healthcare, One female rural IDI participant stressed a link between availability of equipment and drugs on one hand and mother and baby's safety on the other hand: ''I'll also say that quality should be measured based on the ability to avoid any death by having the right machines and drugs to save the mother and the baby. Measuring quality of care should also include whether the facility has all the machines needed to make usfeel well and safe" (Woman, IDI, Rural) A link between availability of medicines and blood on the one hand and women's safety on the other hand was implied in a female urban IDI participant's call for the former (availability of the logistics) to be considered in an assessment of the quality of care at a facility: "You can measure the quality of care by observing whether the hospital has enough medicines and blood available for we the women in case of emergency" (Woman. IDI. Urban) 118 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Healthcare providers added the constant flow of water to the list of indicators for assessing quality of care. A health provider from an urban facility vented out his frustrations on the poor quality of services they provide and the need to consider the calibre of logistics in assessing quality of mate mal healthcare: "Sometimes there is no blood. Sometimes you have to go to the central hospital to get blood. And in emergency situations when you need blood there is a problem. Also, basic consumables like plaster, sterilised gloves and pads, cards, colton, canoia, syringe and saline are a/l a problem. Even water is a big issue for us. Equipment such as ultrasounds, scans, air-conditioners not working at the theatre and many more ... it is a real problem" (Medical doctor, FDG, Urban). An urban nurse justified the need to consider the availability of water in an assessment of quality of maternal healthcare: "Water too is very important and must be considered in assessing quality of maternal healthcare we render to our clients. If there 's no water, the theatres can't junction, labour ward too can't function ... because it's water we use to prevent infections. So, water is very important" (Nurse, IDI, Urban). 4.4.4 Good environmental sanitation Participants, particularly women from urban areas, were of the view that quality of maternal healthcare could further be measured by considering how clean and neat the health facility and its surroundings were. For instance, they stated the need for consulting rooms and maternity wards where clients received care to be improved in terms of ventilation since those places were almost always crowded with clients. The over-crowded nature of the rooms and wards, according to participants, could not be considered as evidence of quality service and should be considered as an indicator for measuring quality of care: 119 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh "The environment o/the health/acility needs to be considered in a~sess~ng the kind 0/ health services we receive in this facility. Look a! the ~ltuatlO~ here, the place is small, and we have many mothers and their babies. .T hls makes the place stuffy and smelly. This is obviously not an Ideal environment for delivering quality healthcare. Therefore, one must consider the state of sanitation at the facility environment to determine whether they are offering good quality care or not" (Woman, IDI, Urban). In respect of the limited space and its effect on environmental sanitation, another woman reiterated that because of the over-crowded nature of the facility, there is poor ventilation, making mothers and their babies very uncomfortable: "The space is so small and when we're many here, no fresh air gets in; so it starts to smell and makes the babies uncomfortable and they begin to cry. This unsanitary outcome makes it imperative to consider the environment important/or assessing quality ofm aternal health" (Woman, FGD, Urban). Many healthcare providers supported the need to consider the state of environmental sanitation of healthcare facilities as an indicator for the assessment of quality of care. 4.4.5 Human resource/workforce The workforce or human resource at health facilities emerged from the data as an indicator for assessing quality of maternal healthcare. Participants argued that it was very important to always have healthcare providers on duty at health facilities to provide quality care services to women. Both women and healthcare providers added that the quality of maternal healthcare could be assessed by looking at the health workforce - that is, the number and scope of availability of workers at a health facility. Some women in the group discussion sessions complained that there were times when they came to the health facilities only to learn that the midwives were absent from duty. Others stated that the Waiting time before they were attended to. Punctuality and regularity of being on duty among bealthcare providers were cited by both urban and rural women. Their experiences were miserable: 120 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh "One thing that should be considered when measuring quality is how many midwives and doctors are available and attending to patients. You come here early and you only have a few midwives attending to so many of us and t~is causes unnecessary delay ... I told my husband to accompany me to hospital for ANC and he refosed because oft he delay that he experienced the first time he came with me. We spend the whole day here" [Woman, FGD, Urban]. A female urban FGD participant justified the need to make the human resource one of the indicators for assessing quality of health care: "Sometimes you come here and there're only one or two midwives on duty, but you look, and see that the number of women waiting to see the same midwife is so high. We don't even talk about the doctors because they are very few. This shortage of staff makes you wait and wait forever. I think the best decision is to consider the number of health workers in the measurement of quality" (Woman, FGD, urban). A rural FGD participant attributed the scope of home deliveries to the non-residence of service providers in the communities: It's equally important that we've some doctors and midwives to be staying in our community because most often, labour starts unexpectedly and in many cases in the middle of the night. When the health centre nurses have closed and gone to Tamale. With the difficulty of transport here, you have no other choice than to be delivered at home. So, I think availability of qualified maternal health professional should be considered in the measurement of quality of care" (Woman, FGD, Rural). The women's views were corroborated by some of the healthcare providers. An urban doctor supported calls to consider human resource in assessing quality of care. He accounted for the poor service provider-client ratios as follows .. The number and quality ofs taff are a problem because most oft he midwives are getting closer to retirement so the strength of the workforce is weak and so we try to improvise with nurses who aren't trained midwives. These nurses are just posted here maybe as general health assistants or trained nurses, but they are not midwives. They're just posted to help because the midwives are not many. So, staffing is a quality of care issue and must be considered" (Doctor, IDI, Urban]. 121 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh An urban midwife agreed with the urban doctor's justification for the long periods clients have to wait to be seen by service providers: "The time spent here by the women is just too much because there aren't enough doctors or midwives that can take care of them on time. There 're just few of us here and the women seeking care are so many; so, you can just imagine the workload on us and the time that these women will have to speed here" (Midwife, IDI. Urban). 4.4.6 Discriminatory provision of maternal healthcare services The National Health Insurance Scheme is another vital theme that emerged from the data. Women, in particular, indicated that accreditation of national health insurance services at the facility level is essential in measuring quality. The women argued that although the cost burden of healthcare is taken care of by the introduction of the insurance, there is discrimination in tenns of access to healthcare provided. They explained that healthcare providers tended to render better services to women who paid for healthcare services out- of-pocket. According to them, since the government did not reimburse facilities on time, care providers attended to those paying their bills out-of-pocket before attending to those with health insurance. The women argued that this practice was unacceptable and, hence, not a good indicator of quality maternal healthcare. ·'Good quality maternal care services should cover the facility accepting insurance and providing the best ofc are to those either with or without health insurance. The practice of attending first to those without insurance is unacceptable" (Woman, FGD, Urban). An ANC client continned the discrimination in favour of clients who footed their bills: "There's discrimination between those with insurance cards and Ihose who come and pay cash, which shouldn't be the case. The workers don 'I regard us as equal and those without insurance gel treated first. This isn 'I good, and it should be considered in assessing quality" (Woman, FGD, Urban). 122 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Another discussant with health insurance narrated her unfavourable experience at a health facility: "Once, I brought in my sick baby but some women who came later were treated before my baby just because they paid cash for their treatment but because I had no money to pay, I had to wait. It's quite uncomfortable but if something is ofg ood quality, it shouldn't make you feel that way. So, it should be considered in the measurement" (Woman, IDJ. Urban). On the issue of discrimination in the provision of maternal healthcare, healthcare providers rationalised it in terms of delays in insurance reimbursements. They indicated that because of delays in reimbursing insurance claims, the health facilities more often than not, ran out of funds to restock supplies. Consequently, they often tended to offer services first to people with the ability to pay for services. An urban doctor rationalised the discrimination that resulted from recourse to the ability to pay principles as follows: "But sometimes comfort comes at a cost because the health insurance will not give that kind of comfort. The health insurance scheme has put more stress on the health facilities than it ever anticipated. Because of delays in reimbursement of insurance funds, sometimes the basic consumables are not there to work with ... and yet, you still have to deliver care. Sometimes there are no canola, no syringes... all these little things should be considered in measuring quality ofm aternal care" (Medical doctor, IDJ, Urban). 4.4.7 Range of services Women stated that the ability to have access to a range of services at a health facility was of grave importance to them and, thus, a sign of quality care. They indicated that some facilities provided services ranging from diagnostic testing and x-rays, to treatment and medications - all being offered at the same place. They, however, explained that in some facilities, clients are requested to go to other facilities to have certain aspects of their conditions investigated before coming back for treatment. This action was deemed to compromise the quality of care: 123 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh "! think the availability of medications is very important, which you di~n 'I mention, Madam. For ify ou go to seek care at a facility and you aren 'I given any medications but rather told to go elsewhere to get it, then it isn't worth going there after all" (Woman, FGD, Urban). Another woman felt satisfied with the range of services available at her current facility: "! decided to come here because they've certain facilities that can detect your health problems and you're given immediate treatment unlike the place where ! had my first delivery. Other hospitals have no machines that can check whether the baby is growing well or not" (Woman, IDI, Urban). 4.4.8 Inter-personal relationship Most of the women explained that the quality of maternal healthcare could be measured by the quality of interpersonal relationship that existed between healthcare providers and their clients. Several of the women added that inter-personal relationship should be the main measure of quality of maternal healthcare. Their main concern was that the prevailing standard of healthc are communication between them and service providers was poor: "You can measure the quality of care by observing what happens daily at the hospital between the nurses and us - the women. The way they treat and talk 10 us will show it" (Woman, FGD, Urban). Another FGD participant elaborated on the poor state of inter-personal relationship at her urban health facility: "Poor communication ... ! mean lack ofr espect for us is a very big issue here. The hea~/hcare providers don't listen to us at all when we come here; they're always m a ~urry to examine us and get rid of us quickly without listening to ollr complamts. So, for me, good communication should be considered in assessing quality ofc are" (Woman, FGD, Urban). Some clients of rural facilities supported the consideration of inter-personal relationship in the assessment of quality of care: "Measuring quality of care should look at the relationship between the workers at the clinic and us, the women, who go there to be delivered" (Woman, FGD, Rural). 124 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Many women argued that healthcare providers should explain care procedures to clients and treat them with respect. This argument was echoed during focus group discussions: "Measuring quality of maternal healthcare should include how healthcare providers treat patients regarding respect" (Woman, FGD, Rural). Some healthcare providers admitted that the relationship between the service providers and women was not the best. They, however, did not agree that inter-personal relationship was the most important indicator of quality of maternal healthcare: "To be honest with you, we sometimes get angry with them but it isn't that we blow it out. I'll express my displeasure to my client but we don '/ scold them like that. In fact, if we do so, it '/I deter them from coming to us" (Midwife, lDI, Urban). 4.4.9 Privacy of clients Many women reported that privacy in the consulting or examination rooms was very important. Privacy was extremely necessary for religious reasons as many of the participants were Muslims and their religious norms prohibit exposure of a woman's private parts to persons other than her husband. An urban woman was unhappy about the current level of privacy: "As a Muslim, you know we aren't supposed to expose our bodies to people who aren't our husbands. So, to me, privacy should be number one in any assessment of quality of care assessment. I'm sometimes not comfortable the way health workers just enter the examination rooms. Sometimes the place is full of students and yet you're supposed to be examined in their presence" (Woman, FGD, Urban). A Muslim woman from a rural location confirmed the urban woman's unfortunate assessment of the quality of privacy at the facilities: .. We Muslim women aren't supposed to expose our nakedness to men that are not our husbands because it is against our religious practices... but this is often not the case when you go for antenatal care services. I will say that this concern of ours should be included in the assessment oif quality if " (Woman, FGD, Rural) 0 care 125 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 4.4.10 Clients' involvement in the care decision-making process Many women indicated the need for healthcare providers to involve clients in the care decision-making process and to provide answers to their questions with courtesy, decorum and respect. The women explained the need for healthcare workers to make time to explain treatment procedures to them for them to be able to make informed decisions. Both urban and rural women, but not the healthcare providers, said this indicator was relevant in assessing quality of maternal healthcare. In the opinion of a female urban FGD participant, client's involvement in the decision-making process was currently non- existent: "Health workers must always explain all procedures to us and involve us in the decision-making process. For now, you just tell them your problem and they don't ask for your opinion, they just write medicine for you. So, assessment of quality must consider engaging patients in the entire care process. If you ask any question, they get angry and talk to you any how" (Woman, 101, Urban]. A similar unsatisfactory picture of the state of clients' involvement in the care decision-making process was painted by a rural FGD participant: "Inclusiveness is zero. If you decide to go for antenatal care services at the health centre, then consider that your body is for the nurses. They chose to examine it the way they want without making you to understand why they do certain things. And when they're done with you, they ask you to dress and go. Explaining to us why they need to examine us should be part of measuring quality ofc are" (Woman, FGD, Rural). 4.4.11 Mother and baby's safety Another issue of great importance that emerged was safety. Many participants stated that care and treatment procedures should be conducted in ways that ensured clients' safety. They argued that safety should be included in assessing quality of maternal healthcare since it is the ultimate outcome of the care process. Healthcare providers also considered this theme and outcome of pregnancy (discussed in secti'on 4412) th .. ,as e two most 126 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh important indicators for measuring quality of maternal healthcare. The importance of safety was narrated by a female rural FGD participant: "Safety is very important and should be included in the assessment of quality of maternal care. If procedures in the hospital aren't conducted well, then they'// compromise quality. I've heard a story about a child losing the hand because the health workers didn't set the infusion well. So, safety is very important. My first born was given an injection and he developed abscess because the nurse didn't do it weir (Woman, FGD, urban). A female rural IDI participant established a link between the levels of clients' safety and the calibre of physical infrastructure in the form of buildings with good storage facilities: "When we talk about safety, it means we should have a good hospital bui/ding with a good storage facility for our medicines and injections so that when our babies take it, they won't be sick but will get better. But this isn't the case at the health centre. They don't have any place for their medicines, so they keep carrying them to and fro on motorbikes and I don 'f think this practice is safe. So, the clients' safety should be considered in the measurement ofq uality" (Woman, IDJ. Rural). 4.4.12 Outcome of pregnancy Both women and healthcare providers agreed that the outcome of pregnancy should be considered in measuring quality of maternal healthcare. However, healthcare providers placed a lot more premium on this indicator. Emphasis was laid on the ability to safely deliver healthy babies with no complications to mothers. According to a doctor at an urban facility, ?ositil'e outc?me.s like good antenatal services resulting in safe deliveries WIthout compilcatlOns should be indicators of quality of care ... it should be measured by the outcome of the pregnancy. Some might have complications, but you can manage them, and they will still be delivered whether at term or not term. If the mother is fine and the baby too is fine it's the best way to measure quality" (Doctor, IDI, Urban). ' 127 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh A midwife at an urban facility was also emphatic about the importance of outcome in the assessment of quality of care: "The outcome ofp regnancy should be used to assess whether there is quality care or not. The end-result should always be healthy mother and baby. Without these positive results. you can't say there's quality care (Midwife, IDI. Urban). A rural midwife held similar views about the importance of outcome in the assessment of quality of care: "Ify ou think of measuring quality, then you have to look at the outcome ... how best we manage complicated situations and are able to deliver safe babies and the mothers are equally healthy ... that is the best indicator of quality care" (Midwife, IDI, rural). 4.4.13 Clients' satisfaction Many women argued that women's satisfaction affects utilization of health facilities and, therefore, should be a priority in the assessment of quality of maternal healthcare in Ghana. Participants stated that clients' satisfaction can be the basis for assessing quality of care. From participants' narratives, it could be inferred that individual clients perceived quality of care differently, hence their perceptions must be considered in measuring care. According to the data, while some clients based their perceptions on treatment and medicines, others based theirs on clients' recovery from health problems they presented at health facilities. Other participants talked about quality in terms of the attention given to patients by healthcare providers. Whichever way their perceptions go, many of the women agreed that their level of satisfaction is key in measuring quality of care. A rural FGD participant's view was as follows: "/ think ~e can measure quality by looking at how women are satisfied with how they re treated when they seek care at the facility. (Woman, FGD, Rural). 128 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh A female urban FGD participant agreed with her rural counterpart's perception of clients' satisfaction as an indicator for measuring quality of care: .. We, as the patients, are customers to the health facility so we should leave being satisfied So, patients' satisfaction is a good measure of quality" (Woman, FGD. Urban). 4.5 Chapter summary This chapter presented findings from the qualitative arm of this study. Findings were presented in line with objectives one and two of the study. In addition to discussing what maternal healthcare quality meant to them, both women and healthcare providers shared their views on how the quality of care should be assessed. Key indicators that participants said needed to be considered when assessing quality of maternal healthcare have been presented in the findings. In total, 13 domains were identified. Each domain had specific sets of indicators that participants said should be used to assess quality of maternal care quality. These domains will be described and validated in the next chapter. 129 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER FIVE RESULTS: MATERNAL CARE QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL 5.1 Introduction This chapter presents the results on the development and experts' validation of the quality of care assessment tool, the suitability of individual items of the tool and their suggested modifications. The first part of the chapter describes the experts' basic characteristics, while the second part focuses on the tool development and validation. 5.2 Selected characteristics of tbe experts Table 8 presents selected background information about the experts who were surveyed to assess the content suitability and validity of the proposed tool for measuring quality of maternal care. A total of 55 experts were recruited, with most of them being females (54.5%,30/55). The median age of the experts was 35.5years (lQR: 32 - 45). About seven in every ten (71.7%, 32/55) selected experts worked at hospitals. Nurses/midwives were the majority (69.1%, 38/55). Half of the experts had a maximum working experience of six years while the remaining half had over six years of experience (median: 6 years). Most of the experts worked in urban communities (87.3%, 48/55). ~.uo University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 8: Experts background characteristics Frequency (n-55) Percentage Characteristic Age in years Median (LQ, UQ) 35.5 (32,45) 7 12.73 < 30 30 54.55 31-40 32.73 41+ 18 Sex Male 25 45.5 Female 30 54.6 Place of work Hospitals 38 69.1 Ghana Health Service 8 14.5 Universities 4 7.3 Ministry of Health 5 9.1 Profession Public health officerl Administrator 6 10.9 Lecturer 4 7.3 Gynaecologists/doctor 12 21.8 Nurse! midwife 33 60.00 Working years Median, (LQ, UQ) 6 (3, 14) 1-3years 3 5.5 4-6years 10 18.2 7-9years 25 45.5 >9years 17 30.9 Work setting Urban 48 87.3 Rural 7 12.7 LQ= Lower quartile, UQ= Upper quartile 5.3 Domains of assessment Based on the qualitative results presented in Chapter Four, a maternal quality assessment tool was developed. The tool was proposed to comprise 57 indicators/items across 13 different domains of quality with varying measurable numbers of items. These 13 domains and specific quality of care indicators are presented below. 5.3.1 Health facility domain Five items/indicators were proposed to be used to assess the health facility aspect of quality of maternal care (see Table 9). The question on availability of health facility was regarded to be essential by 94.5% (52/55) of the experts as they either agreed or strongly 131 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh agreed on its relevance. It also had a content validity index (CVl) score of 0.89. The Proximity of health facility to clients question also had a CVI score of 0.89 as 94.5% (52/55) of the experts responded that they agreed or strongly disagreed to it. Availability of adequate seats was the least-rated item as an indicator for measun.n g quaf 1t y 0 f health facility as it scored a CVI of 0.67, with only 83% of the experts strongly agreeing or agreeing to its relevance. Table 9: Indicators for assessing bealtb facility domain SD D U A SA CVI Indicator/item n(%) n(%) n(%) n (%) n (%) Availability of health 2 (3.64) 0(0) I (1.82) facility 9 (16.36) 43 (78.18) 0.89 Proximity of health facility to clients 1 (1.82) 0(0) 2 (3.64) 16 (29.09) 36 (65.45) 0.89 Health facility being spacious to accommodate 0(0) 5 (9.09) 2 (3.64) 21 (38.18) 27 (49.09) 0.75 all clients Availability of adequate seats 2 (3.7) 6 (11.11) 1 (1.85) 24 (42.59) 22 (40.74) 0.67 Availability of adequate beds 1(1.85) 3 (5.56) 3 (5.56) 15 (25.93) 33 (61.11) 0.74 CVI: Content validity index, n: frequency, %: percentage, SO= Strongly disagree, O=Oisagree, U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly disagree 5.3.2 Amenities in bealtb facility domain The amenities aspect of quality of maternal was proposed to be assessed using four questions (see Table 10): Urinal is clean and neat and toilet is clean and neat were both regarded to be essential by 85.2% (47/55) of the experts as they agreed or strongly agreed to their relevance. They both had a CVI score of 0.70. Availability of adequate number of toilets for clients and availability of adequate number of urinals for clients were, however, rated below 0.6 and, hence, needed some modification to improve their suitability. 132 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 10: Indicators for assessing amenities in bealtb facility domain SD D U A SA CVI Indicator/item n(%) n (%) n(%) n(%) 0(%) Availability of adequate number of 3 (5.45) 7 (12.73) 2 (3.64) 22 (40.74) 21 (38.89) 0.59 urinals for clients Availability of adequate number of 3 (5.45) 7 (12.73) 2 (3.64) 19 (34.55) 24 (43.64) 0.56 toilets for clients Toilet is clean and neat 1(1.85) 4(7.41) 3(5.56) 19(33.33) 28(51.85) 0.70 Urinaliscleaandneat 1(1.85) 4(7.41) 3(5.56) 19(33.33) 28(51.85) 0.70 CVI=Content Validity Index, n- frequency, %: percentage. SD Strongly disagree, D Disagree, U= Undecided, A = Agree. SA = Strongly agree 5.3.3 Healtb Facility Environment domain The 'environment of the health facility is clean' and the 'environment is airy and fresh' were the only two questions proposed to be used to assess the quality of environment of a health facility. Both questions were rated as 'strongly agree' or 'agree' by 89.1% (49/55) and 87.3% (48/55) of the experts respectively with CVI scores of 0.78 each (see Table \1). Table 11: Indicators for assessing bealtb facili!): environment domain SD D U A SA CVI Indicator/item n(%) n(%) n (%) 0(%) 0(%) The environment of the I (1.82) 1 (1.82) 4 (7.27) is 17(30.91) 32 (58.18) 0.78 health facility clean The environment is airy I (1.85) 2 (3.7) 4 (7.41) and fresh 19 (34.55) 29 (52.73) 0.78 CVI=Content validity index, n= frequency, %=percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, D=Disagree, U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 5.3.4 Privacy in bealtb facility domain Three items/indicators were proposed to be used to assess privacy in health facilities as indicators of quality of care. These items/questions are shown in Table 12. Privacy in the consulting room, privacy in the examination room of the facility and healthcare providers respect the privacy of patients were generally regarded as appropriate as they had CVI of 0.82 or more. 133 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 12: Indicators for assessing privacy in health facilities SD D U A SA CVI Indicator/item n(%) n(%) n (%) n (%) 0(%) There is privacy in the consulting 3 (5.45) 2 (3.64) 0 (0) II (20) 39 (70.91) 0.82 room There is privacy in the examination 1(1.82) 1 (1.82) I (1.82) 13 (23.64) 39 (70.91) 0.89 room of the facility Healthcare providers respect the I (1.82) I (1.82) 2 (3.64) 14 (25.45) 37 (67.27) 0.85 privacy of patients CVI=Content Validity Index, n=frequency, % percentage, SD Strongly disagree, D Disagree, U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 5.3.5 Inter-personal relationship domain Regarding quality of inter-personal relationship, seven items/questions were proposed. Experts regarded all items as essential to measuring quality of inter-personal relationship as all the questions had a CVI of 0.75 (see Table 13). Table 13: Indicators for assessing quality of inter-personal relationship Indicator/item SD D U A SA CVI n(%) n (%) D (%) D (%) n (%) Healthcare worker explain procedure well to clients 1(\.82) 3 (5.45) 2 (3.64) 8 (14.55) 41 (74.55) 0.78 Healthcare providers treats clients I (1.82) 3 (5.45) 0 (0) with respect 8 (14.55) 43 (78.18) 0.85 Healthcare providers request consent before clinical procedure 2 (3.64) 2 (3.64) 0(0) 17 (30.91) 34 (61.S2) 0.85 Healthcare providers answer clients' questions satisfactorily I (1.82) 2 (3.64) 0(0) 20 (36.36) 32 (58.IS) 0.89 Healthcare providers involve clients or partner in decision- 1(\.82) 3 (5.45) 3 (5.45) 19 (34.55) 29 (52.73) 0.75 making Healthcare providers are polite to clients 1(\.82) 4(7.27) 0(0) 16(29.09) 34(6I.S2) 0.82 CVI= Content validity index, n= frequency, %-percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, D=Disagree, U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 5.3.6 Human resource domain Quality of human resource questions were rated generally as appropriate (CVI ~ 0.60) (see Table 14). However, the question on availability of health assistants to attend to clients was not rated good enough as it had a CVI of < 0.6 and, hence, was later modified in line with suggestions by the experts. 134 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 14: Indicators for assessing guali~ or human resources in health racm~ -- --U------T -- Indicatorlltem SD D SA CVI n (%) n(%) n (%) n(%) n(%) Midwives on duty are adequate and attend to different clients at the same time 2(3.64) 6(10.91) 2(3.64) 9(16.36) 36(65.45) 0.64 Adequate doctors are on duty 2(3.64) 5(9.09) 1(1.82) 15(27.27) 32(58.18) 0.71 Availability of health assistants to attend to clients 1(1.82) 6(10.91) 5(9.09) 19(34.55) 24(43.64) 0.56 Availability of medical records staff to facilitate fast retrieval of medical records 1(1.82) 3(5.45) 2(3.64) 20(36.36) 29(52.73) 0.78 Healthcare provided to clients in a timely manner 1(1.82) 3(5.45) I( 1.82) 12(21.82) 38(69.09) 0.82 Ability of service providers to provide all services needed 3(5.45) 6(10.91) 2(3.64) 18(32.73) 26(47.27) 0.60 CVI=Content validity index, n=frequency, o/o=percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, O=Disagree, U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 135 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.3.7 Safety in health facility domain Only two items were proposed to be used to assess the safety aspect of maternal care in health facilities (see Table 15). Both questions were regarded as relevant as they had CVI of at least 0.75. Details of items on the safety of health facility assessment are shown in Table 16. Table 15: Indicators for assessing safety in health facilities SD D U A SA CVI Indicator/ltem n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) n(%) Adequate measures are put in place 0(0) 2(3.64) 5(9.09) 11(20) 37(67.27) 0.75 to ensure patients safety The environment of the health 0(0) 1(1.82) 2(3.64) 18(32.73) 34(61.82) facility is safe 0.89 CVI=Content validity index=, n- frequency, %-percentage, SD- Strongly disagree, D-Disagree, U= Undecided. A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 5.3.8 Range of Services domain In terms of the range of services domain, three items/questions were used, namely availability of all services clients need, availability of specialists to provide required services in the health facility and all service delivery points located within the health facility. Apart from the question on availability of all services clients need, the other two questions were regarded as appropriate by the experts as they had CVI scores of over 0.60 (Table 17). Table 16: Indicators to assess range of services in health facilities Iodicator/item SD D U A SA CVI n(%) n (%) n (%) n(%) n (%) Availability of alI services clients need 1(1.82) 8(14.55) 5(9.09) 11(20) 30(54.55) 0.49 Availability of specialists to provide needed services at the health facility 1(1.82) 3(5.45) 3(5.45) 17(30.91) 31(56.36) 0.75 All service delivery points located within the health facility 0(0) 5(9.09) 5(9.09) 18(32.73) 27(49.09) 0.64 CVI=Content validity index, n frequency, % percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, D-Disagree. U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 136 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.3.9 Health insurance domain A total of three (3) indicators/items were used to assess the quality of health insurance domain in health facilities. All the items were rated generally as appropriate (CVI ~ 0.60) except one, namely insurance covers all services provided to clients. Details are provided Table 18. Table 17: Indicators for assessing health insurance domain SD D U A SA CVI Indicator/item n (%) n (%) n(%) n(%) n (%) Facility accepts national health insurance 2(3.64) 2(3.64) 3(5.45) 14(25.45) 34(61.82) 0.75 Non-discrimination between insured and non-insured clients 1(1.82) 1(1.82) 2(3.64) 16(29.09) 35(63.64) 0.85 Insurance covers all services provided to 1(1.82) clients 6(10.91) 6(10.91) 17(30.91) 25(45.45) 0.53 CVI=Contcnt validity index, n-frequency, %=percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, D Disagree, U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 5.3.10 Logistics and supplies domain Questions on the quality of logistics and supplies proposed were five in all and were rated generally appropriate (CVI ~ 0.60) with the exception of the question on informing patient on nature of pain which had a CVI score of < 0.60. Details of items on quality of logistics and supplies assessment are shown in Table 19. Table 18: Indicators for assessing logistics and supplies in health facilities Indicator/item SO 0 U A SA CVI n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Availability of prescribed medications at the health facility 2(3.64) 2(3.64) 1(1.82) 15(27.27) 35(63.64) 0.82 Availability of diagnostic test (laboratory, ultrasound) atthe health 2(3.64) 1(1.82) 2(3.64) 12(21.82) 38(69.09) 0.82 facility Measures taken to relieve pain to patients during labour I( 1.82) 4(7.27) 1(1.82) 15(27.27) 34(61.82) 0.78 Measures to reduce pain during labour are effective 1(1.82) 3(5.45) 3(5.45) 17(30.91) 31(56.36) 0.75 Informing clients of nature of pain 2(3.64) 3(5.45) 7(12.73) 14(25.45) 29(52.73) 0.56 CVI=Cont~nt validity index, n=frequency, %=percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, D=Disagree, U= Undecided. A = Agree, SA = Strongly disagree 131 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.3.11 Pain management domain Three items were proposed to be used to assess quality of pain management (see Table 20). Only one of the three questions had a CVI less than 0.60 and was subsequently modified in line with suggestions provided by the experts. Table 19: Indicators for assessing quality of pain management in health facilities SD D U A SA CVl Indicator/item n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Measures taken to relieve pain during 1(1.82) 4(7.27) 1(1.82) 15(27.27) 34(61.82) 0.78 labour Measures to reduce pain during labour 1(1.82) 3(5.45) 3(5.45) are effective 17(30.91) 31(56.36) 0.75 Clients informed of nature of pain 2(3.64) 3(5.45) 7(12.73) 14(25.45) 29(52.73) 0.56 CVI=Content validity index. n=frequency, %=percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, D-Disagree, U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree. 5.3.12 Clients' satisfaction domain The quality of care as regards clients' satisfaction domain was proposed to be assessed using seven questions. Generally, the experts rated all the items as appropriate (CVI ~ 0.60) (see Table 21). Table 20: Indicators for assessing clients' satisfaction with care received SD D U A SA CVI Indicator/item n(%) n(%) n(%) n (%) n(%) Client satisfied with treatment outcome for self 1(1.82) 3(5.45) 1(1.82) 19(34.55) 31(56.36) 0.82 Client satisfied with treatment outcome for baby 1(1.82) 1(1.82) 4(7.27) 17(30.91) 32(58.18) 0.78 General satisfaction with treatment received at health facility 2(3.64) 1(1.82) 2(3.64) 21(38.18) 29(52.73) 0.82 Satisfaction with healthcare providers' attitude 1(1.82) 8(14.55) 2(3.64) 13(23.64) 31(56.36) 0.60 Satisfaction with education received on condition 3(5.45) 5(9.09) 0(0) 20(36.36) 27(49.09) 0.71 Satisfaction with inter-personal communication (between health 2(3.64) 5(9.09) 2(3.64) 12(21.82) care provider and client) 34(61.82) 0.67 Satisfaction with review information received from 1(1.82) 4(7.27) 1(1.82) healthcare providers 21(38.18) 28(50.91) 0.78 CVI=Content validity index, n=frequency, o/o=percentage, SD= Strong! d' D=O' U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree. Y lsagree, lsagree, 138 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.3.13 Overall outcome The two questions were proposed to be used to assess the overall outcome were rated generally as appropriate (CVI ~ 0.80) according to the experts (see Table 22). Table 21: Indicators for assessing overall outcome of care SA CVI n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) No injury to mother 1(1.82) 1(1.82) 0(0) 18(32.73) 35(63.64) 0.93 Live birth achieved 2(3.64) 0(0) 0(0) 18(32.73) 35(63.64) 0.93 CVI=Content validity index, n=frequency, %=percentage, SD- Strongly disagree, D Disagree, U= Undecided, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree. 5.4 Additional items suggested by experts and final tool During the evaluation and validation of the proposed tool for assessing quality of care, the 55 experts were requested to suggest for inclusion new domains and items as well as modification of existing items. Table 23 shows a summary of experts' suggestions. The three dominant suggestions were to incorporate questions on periodic training and workshops for staff. motivation of staff and adequate supply of water, electricity and other utility services. Using these recommendations in combinations with the domains and items described above, a quality of maternal care assessment tool was developed. The revised tool comprised 57 items across the 13 domains. This tool was then pre-tested on a sample of 50 women (not included in the actual study) and the tool was further assessed for validity. Results from the further assessment based on the pre-test are discussed below. 139 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 22: Suggestions from experts Tbemes Frequency Proportion Staff to clients ratio and other ratios 5 8.8 Discrimination against clients 3 2.7 Housekeeping services at filcility 3 2.8 Periodic training and workshop for staff 13 12.6 Waiting time by clients 4 4.4 Motivation of staff 7 8.1 Adequate supply of water, electricity and other utility services 9 11.4 Appropriate referral system 3 4.3 Catering services at the health facility I 1.5 Education of clients on maternal care 6 9.1 Availability of specialists (Gynaecologists, etc.) I 1.7 Attendance to clients 2 3.4 5.5 Item reduction and validity analysis Item reduction and validity analysis was perfonned using the results from the pretest to ensure that only parsimonious, useful and internally consistent items were finally included in the tool. An item was considered functional if it correlated with other items, discriminated between individual cases, underscored a single or multi-dimensional domain and contributed significantly to the construct. Results from the pretest based on the 57 items show that the correlation coefficient between items ranged from 0.31 to 0.93, indicating that the items were functional in tenns of communing together to measure quality of maternal healthcare. The discrimination ability of the items was measured with the item discrimination indices. The results are shown in Table 23. Generally, the item discrimination indices ranged from -0.21 to 2.30. Items which were identified not to be effective were those with discrimination indices whose p-values were greater than 0.05. As can be seen in Table 23, items 1-10 had p-values greater than 0.05. Consequently, these items were discarded. The final tool comprised 47 items distributed across the 13 domains (Table 24). 140 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table lJ: Item discrimination indices of construct items Discrimination 95%CI P-value IItmll.dicator Index -0.414.0.0001 0.05 I. Healtll fadlity uses computerized systems for retrinal of records -0.2070 -0.4455.0.0391 0.1 1. I.fol'llli., clients of nature of pain -0.2032 -0.4587. 0.093 I 0.194 3. I.suraote conring IU sen'ices pro\'ided to dients -0.1828 -0.1998,0.1461 0.761 4. Health facility uses manual retrieval of records -0.0268 S. -0.2741.0.2452 0.9lJ ,\vlillbllity of toilet facilities separated for males and females -0.0145 -0.259. 0.2474 0.964 6, You get .11 )our medication "ilhin the health facility -0.0058 0.274 7. All service delive!') points are locI ted within the health fadli!) 0.1294 -0.1023. 0.36 \l -O.U69,O.396 0.286 8. ".ailability of diagnostic I~ts O.lJ96 -0.0423,0.343 0.126 ,. food provided by the facility ill good 0.1503 0.215 10. AVllllbility of prescribed medications at the heallh facility 0.1734 -0.1007.0.4475 II. Non-discrimmation between inSured and non-Insured clients 0,2371 0.0359,0.4383 0,021 12 Women who are richer thlll! you are trelled much faster and bener at the health 0.3614 0.1104.0,6124 0.005 fIClllt' 13 You have home "isitation after the delivery at the health facility 0.3622 0,1252, 0.5993 0.003 14, You feel discrimmated against at any POInIIn time In the health facihty because )OU do nol come from a rich background 0.4188 0.1727, 0,6648 0,001 (5, You have to wal~ a long dlslance in order 10 gel the medicines that are available 0.4353 0.1714.0.6992 0.001 16 Pro~imlty of health facility to chents 0.4475 0,2599,0,6351 <0.01 17 Availability of adequate urinals for chents 0.4800 0,2055,0,7545 0,001 18 Health filcility has an effectIVe referral system in place 0,4828 0.2546. 0,711 <0.01 19. Health facility being spacious 10 accommodale all clients 0.5092 0,2524, 0,766 <0,001 20 Tollells clean and neat 0.5587 0.3208. 0.7965 <0,001 21 AVlJlabllit)' of needed sel"'lce, 10 chenls 0.5735 0.2849, 0.8621 <0.001 22 You pay for the medications Ihat you get 8tthe health facllily 0,5980 0,3202, 0.8758 <0,001 2l Availability of cxpens for sel"lces In the health facililY 0.6000 0,3241.0.8758 <0,001 24 Urinal is clean and neat 0,6331 0.3815.0.8847 <0,001 25 You buy your medication outSide the health facllily 0,6702 0.3943, 0,9461 <0,001 26 Healthcare proVided to you in a timely manner 0,6889 0.4835,0,8943 <0,001 27 Ability of se"'lce providers 10 prm ide needed services 0,7019 0.4295.0,9743 <0,001 28 Facihty accepl<; national health msurancc 0,7288 0,5006,0,957 <0,001 29, MidWIVes on duty arc adequate and attend to dilTerent chents at the same time 0.7558 0.5128,0,9987 <0,001 30 Healthcarc prOVider involves you or partner in deCision-making 0,7851 0.5243, 1.046 <0.001 31 Healthcare ... orkers prOVide adequale mformation and education on my pregnancy 0.7867 0.5026, 1,0707 <0,001 32. AVlJlabilily of adequale seats 0,8323 05998, 1.0648 <0001 3l Live binh achieved 0.8631 05946,1.1316 <0,001 34. Availabillly of medical records staff to facilitate fast retrieval of medical records 0.9058 0,6474, 11641 <0,001 3', Many doctors are on duly 0.9351 06778, 11923 <0,001 36 Tbere is privacy in the exammation room of the facility 0,9465 0,6489, 1.2442 <0.001 37. AvatlallJlity ofpcople or health asSistants to assisl clients 0,9923 o 7422, 1.2425 <0,001 38 Healthcare.provider answers YOID" questions salisfactorily 1.0095 0,7086. 1.3104 <0,001 39. There is pnvaq In the consulting room 1.0316 0,7544, U089 <0,001 40, The environment is airy and fresh 1.0796 0,7745, 1.3847 <0.001 41 No injury to mother 1.1069 0,8159,1.3979 <0,001 42, HeIIthcare prOVider requests consenl hefore clinical procedure 1.1421 0.8538, 1.4304 <0001 41 SIltSfactlon about review of information received from healthcare providers 1.2336 0,9169, 1.5503 <0,001 44, The enVlJOnment of health facilil) is clean 1.2774 0,9893, 15655 <0.001 45. Healthcare providers respect clients' privacy 1.3114 1.0024. 1.6204 <().OOI 46, Sallsfactlon about education received on condition 13315 0,9389. I. 7242 <0,001 47, Health pro"ders are polite to clients 1.3728 I ,0476, I 698 <0,001 48. Chem's satisfied wilh treatment outcome for bab) 1.3819 0,9574, 1.8064 <0,001 49, HeaIthcare worker explains procedure 10 you 14181 11072.1.7289 <0,001 SO. I feel the environmenl at the health facility is safe 1.6290 1.2668, 1.9912 <0.001 51, Measures pUi in place to reduce pain during labour are effective S:, 1.7552 1,2375,2,2729 <0,001 Measures pUi in ,place to ensUR clients' safety are adequate 1.7730 So. HeIIthcare proVider with respect 1.3899,2.1561 IRaled you <0.001 18007 1.4108,2.1905 54. alent 15 satisfied with Irellmenl oUicome for self <0,001 1.8451 ~. 1,2945, 2.3957 GcneraI Sllisfaction with lrea1ment received at health facility <0,001 2.0277 1.5393, BI61 :faction WIth mter-personaJ communication between bealthcare prOVider and <0001 22207 51 s.tisfltaion with healtbcare providers' attitude I. 7587. 26828 <0.001 2.3017 .... WillI JHliue2 hours walk 1I2 21.54 47 MeaDs of traosportatioo 9.04 Walking 238 BicyclelMotor cycleffricycle 45.77 Car 205 39.42 77 14.81 146 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 6.3 Respondents' maternal characteristics Table 26 shows the respondents' maternal characten.s t 'I CS. On the average , each of the respond e nts had conc.e ivd e2. 7 times (SD=± I .4 9) and had delivered averagely 2.3 times (SD=± 1.42). The average number of ANC visits by each respondent was 3.71 (SD=± 1.68). Table 26: Respondents' maternal characteristics Cbaracteristic Frequency Percentage Number of times pregnant Mean± SO 2.7 ± 1.49 1-2 260 50.00 3-4 198 38.08 5+ 62 11.92 Number of deliveries Mean± SO 2.3 ± 1.42 o 26 5.00 \-2 306 58.85 3-4 147 28.27 5+ 41 7.88 Number of ANC Visits Mean± SO 3.71 ± 1.68 None 27 5.19 I 26 5.00 2 56 10.77 140 26.92 4+ 271 52.12 Mode of Delivery Caesarean Section 47 9.04 Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery 473 90.96 6.4 Women's rating of the quality of mate mal care domains A key objective of this study was to assess the quality of maternal care women received during their most recent pregnancy. Tables 27a, 27b, and 27c show women's assessment of the quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy based on the 13 domains used in the assessment. Under the health facility domain, the mean score on the five-point scale for proximity of health facility to clients was approximately 3.3, with 72 (14.42%) of the respondents strongly disagreeing, 105 (20.19%) disagreeing and 52 (l 0.0%) remaining neutral. One hundred and sixty-three respondents (31.35%) agreed 147 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh and 125 (24.04%) of them strongly agreed. Under amenities domain. the mean score on the five-point scale for urinal is clean and neat was 3.21. with 54 (10.38%) of the respondents strongly disagreeing. 117 (22.5%) of them disagreeing. 61 (11.73%) respondents being neutral, 241 (46.35%) respondents agreeing and 47 (9.04%) of them strongly agreeing. 148 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 27a: Women's assessment of quality of maternal care they received during their most recent--...::p.:..rc:::Jgc.:":::a::.:D:;::c:.,YL.-_____________ m DNA ~ QaaUty of care domaias aDd iDdicaton Mean ± SD n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (0/.) Health fac:iUty domain 1. Proximity of health facility to clients (less than 5km) 3.3 ± 1.4 75(14.42) 105(20.19) 52(10) 163(31.35) 125(24.0{0000 2. Health facility is spacious to accommodate all clients 3.53 ± 1.07 19(3.65) III (21.35) 31 (5.96) 292(56.15) 67(12.88) JJJJ 3. Health facility has seats 2.89± 1.24 53(10.19) 218(41.92) 36(6.92) 160(30.77) 53(10.19) 'P'P'P'P Amenities domain 4. Health facility has adequate urinals for clients 3.53 ± 1.09 34(6.54) 81( 15.58) 43(8.27) 300(57.69) 62( 11.92) -p.-p.-p.-p. 5. Toilet is clean and neat 2.91 ± 1.16 70(\3.46) 126(24.23) 143(27.5) 144(27.69) 37(7.12) IIII 6. Urinal is clean and neat 3.21 ± 1.19 54(10.38) 117(22.5) 61(11.73) 241(46.35) 47(9.04) ))) I Environment domain 7. The environment of health facility is clean 4.05 ± 0.68 4(0.77) 15(2.88) 37(7.12) 358(68.85) 106(20.38'8888 8. The environment is airy and fresh 4.08 ± 0.72 5(0.96) 12(2.31) 51(9.81) 321(61.73) 131(25.19.~1 ~I ~I ~I Privacy domain 9. There is privacy in the consulting room 4.01 ±0.96 10(1.92) 48(9.23) 32(6.15) 268(51.54) 162(31.15} .-- 10. There is privacy in the examination room 4.14±0.89 6(\.1 S) 42(8.08) 13(2.5) 272(52.31) 187(35.96) 11. Healthcare providers respect clients' privacy 4.07 ± 0.82 6(\.1S) 31(S.96) 30(5.77) 305(58.65) 148(28.46) Interpersonal relationship domain 12. Healthcare workers provide adequate information and education on my 4.13 ± 0.81 9( 1.73) 21(4.04) 24(4.62) 303(58.27) 163(31.35) pregnancy 13. Healthcare worker explained procedures to you 3.89± 0.82 7(1.35) 39(7.5) 49(9.42) 335(64.42) 90(17.31 ) 14. Healthcare provider treated you with respect 3.93 ± 0.77 4(0.77) 26(5) 72(13.85) 321(61.73) 97(18.65) 15. Healthcare provider requested your consent before clinical procedures 3.81 ± 0.89 6(1.15) 60(11.54) 50(9.62) 315(60.58) 89(17.12) 16. HeaJtbcare provider answered your questions satisfactorily 3.99± 0.77 6(1.15) 26(5) 41(7.88) 341(65.58) 106(20.38) 17. Healthcare provider involved you or partner in your care decision-making 3.49 ± 1.00 21(4.04) 88(16.92) 70(13.46) 296(56.92) 45(8.65) 18. You have home visitation after the delivery at the health facility 1.99 ± 1.30 282(5423) 98(18.85) 30(5.77) 85(16.35) 25(4.81) 19. You felt discriminated against at any point in time at the health facility 2.33 ± 1.25 148(28.46) 2]0(40.38) 44(8.46) 76(14.62) 42(8.08) because you do not come from a rich background 20. Women who are richer are treated much faster and better at the health facility 2.32 ± 1.25 146(28.08) 220(42.31) 43(8.27) 66(12.69) 45(8.65) than poor women 2I.Healthp~viders_~politetoclients 3.8I±0.84 12(2.31) 31(5.96) 75(14.42) 326(62.69) 76(14.62) N=frequency, %--percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, D=Disagree, N= Neutral, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 149 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ....b l.27b: Women'. lUl8eAment of quality of maternal care tbey received during their most recent ~regoancy SD D N A SA Quali!l of care domaios and indicators Mean ±SD n (%) n(%) 0(%) n(%) n(%) Human resource domain 22. Midwives on duty were adequate and attending to different clients at 3.38 ± 1.06 17(3.27) 137(26.35) 45(8.65) 276(53.08) 45(8.65) the same time 23. Doctors on duty were sufficient 2.55 ± 1.28 126(24.23) 178(3423) 60(11.54) 117(22.5) 39(7.5) 24. People or health assistants are readily available to assist clients 3.63 ±0.93 8(1.54) 79(15.19) 71(13.65) 299(57.5) 63(12.12) 25. Medical records staff are readily available to facilitate fast retrieval 3.56 ± 0.90 7(1.35) 84(16.15) 84(16.15) 302(58.08) 43(8.21) of medical records 26. Healthcare provided to you in a timely manner (without delay or 2.97 ± 1.13 50(9.62) 167(32.12) 14(14.23) 208(40) 21(4.04) within I hour) 21. Service providers have the ability to provide needed services to you 3.79 ± 0.88 18(3.46) 48(9.23) 17(3.27) 380(73.08) 57(10.96) Safety domain 28. Adequate measures put in place to ensure clients' safety 3.92± 0.73 5(0.96) 25(4.81) 56(10.77) 357(68.65) 77(14.81) 29. I feel the environment at the health facility is safe (e.g. free from 3.91 ± 0.80 5(0.96) 32(6.15) 61(12.88) 311(60.96) 99(19.04) dangerous animals and hazards) Range of services domain 30. Health facility has all services I needed 3.79 ± 0.98 23(4.42) 52(10) 21(4.04) 340(65.38) 84(16.15) 31. Health facility has adequate specialists/experts to provide services 3.48 ± 1.04 23(4.42) 95(18.27) 66(12.69) 282(54.23) 54(10.38) you needed at the health facility 32. Health facility has an effective referral systems in place 3.10± 0.89 15(2.88) 29(5.58) 121(24.42) 213(52.5) 76(14.62) Health insurance services domain 33. Health facility accepts health insurance 4.71 ± 0.46 1(0.19) 3(0.58) 108(20.77) 408(18.46) 34. There is non-discrimination between insured and non-insured clients 3.58± 1.26 32(6.15) 103(19.81) 61(11.13) 171(34.04) 141(28.21) at health facility N=fTequency, %=percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, D=Disagree, N= Neutral, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree ISO University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 27c: Women's asseasmen. of9uality ofmatcraal care tbey received during their most recent pregnancy SD D N A SA Mean ±SD n(%) n (%) n(%) n(%) n(%) Lociatics and supplies domain 35. You pay for the medications that you get at the health facility 2.28 ± 1.17 151(29.04) 209(40.19) 47(9.04) 9207.69) 21(4.04) 36. You buy your medication outside the health facility 2.66 ± 1.22 103(19.81) 171(32.88) 73(14.04) 147(28.27) 26(5) 37. You have to walk a long distance in order to get the medicines that 2.46 ± 1.48 187(35.96) 151(29.04) 10(1.92) 101(19.42) 71(13.65) are available at the health facility PaiD management domain 38. Measures to reduce pain during labour are effective 3.14± 1.18 65(12.5) 108(20.77) 60(11.54) 262(50.38) 25(4.81) CUents' satisfaction domain 39. You are satisfied with treatment outcome for yourself 4.05 * 0.73 6( 1.15) 22(4.23) 23(4.42) 358(68.85) 111(21.35) 40. You are satisfied with treatment outcome for your baby 4.11 *0.72 5(0.96) 15(2.88) 33(6.35) 330(63.46) 137(26.35) 41. You are generally satisfied with treatment received at health facility 4.03 ± 0.73 3(0.58) 20(3.85) 52(10) 327(62.88) 118(22.69) 42. You are satisfied with healthcare providers' attitude 3.63 ± 0.93 7(1.35) 78(15) 80(15.38) 288(55.38) 67(12.88) 43. You are satisfied with education received on condition 4.03 * 0.69 2(0.38) 24(4.62) 33(6.35) 360(69.23) 101(19.42) 44. You are satisfied with inter-personal communication (between 3.68* 0.91 6(1.15) 71(\3.65) 77(14.81) 296(56.92) 70(13.46) heaJthcare provider and clients) 45. You are satisfied with review information received from healthcare 3.91 * 0.69 2(0.38) 33(6.35) 39(7.5) 381(73.27) 65(12.5) providers Outcomes domain 46. No injury to mother 4.3 * 0.75 4(0.77) 9(1.73) 40(7.69) 241(46.35) 226(43.46) 47. Live birth achieved 4.43 * 0.68 3(0.58) 3(0.58) 30(5.77) 216(41.54) 268(51.54) N-frequency, %=percentage, SD= Strongly disagree, D=Disagree, N= Neutral, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 151 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 28 shows the best-rated and worst-rated indicators under each domain. Under the health facility domain, the best-rated indicator was spaciousness of facilities to accommodate all clients (3.53) while the worst-rated was availability of seats (2.89). Adequacy of urinals (3.35) and cleanest and neatness of toilets (2.91) were respectively the best and the worst rated indicators under amenities domain. In respect of the environment domain, its airy and fresh characteristics (4.08) was the best- rated indicator whilst its cleanness was the worst rated. Privacy in the examination room (4.14) and the consulting room (4.11) came first and last respectively under the privacy domain. Women rated adequate information and education on the pregnancy (4.13) as the best indicator in the interpersonal relationship domain. The worst-rated indicator under the same domain was home visitation after delivery at the facility (1.99). The best-rated indicator under the human resource domain was ability on the part of service providers to provide needed services to clients (3.79). The worst-rated indicator in the domain was sufficiency of doctors on duty (2.55). As regards the safety domain, the best-rated indicator was adequacy of measures put in place to ensure clients' safety (3.92). The worst-rated indicator was the feeling that the environment of the health facility was safe (that is, it was free from dangerous animals and hazards) with a mean score of 3.91. Health facilities having all services needed (3.79) was the foremost indicator under range of services domain. The least-rated indicator was the inadequacy of specialist and experts to provide needed services at the facility (3.48) BUying one's medication outside the facility (2.66) was the best-rated indicator under the domain of logistics and supplies (2.66). The worst-rated indicator was paying for 152 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh medication at facility (2.26). In respect of clients' satisfaction domain, the best-rated indicator was satisfaction with treatment outcome for baby (4.11). The worst-rated indicator was satisfaction with providers' attitude (3.63). Achievement of live birth (4.43) was the better-rated of the two indicators under the outcome domain. Table 28: Best and Worst-rated indicators under domains of quality of maternal care Domains Best-rated indicator Worst-rated indicator I. Health Facility Spacious to accommodate Facility has seats (2.89± 1.29) clients (3.53±l.07) 2. Amenities Adequacy of urinals (3.35) Toilet is clean and neat 2.91 3. Environment Airy and fresh environment Clean environment (4.0S±O.68) (4.08±O.72) 4. Privacy Privacy in examination room Privacy in consulting room (4.14±O.89) (4.01±O.96) 5. Interpersonal Adequate information and Post-delivery home visitation Relationship education on pregnancy (4.13) (1.99) 6. Human Resource Service providers have the Adequacy of doctors on duty ability to provide needed (2.55) services to you (3.79) 7. Safety Adequate of measures put in I feel the environment of the place to ensure clients' safety health facility is safe (e.g. from (3.92) dangerous animals) (3.91) 8. Range of Services Facility has all services needed Facility has adequate (3.79) specialists/experts to provide needed services (3.91) 9. Health Insurance Facility accepts health Non-discrimination between insurance (4.77) insured and non-insured clients at facility (3.48) 10. Logistics and Supplies You buy your medication You pay for medication at the outside the facility 2.66) facility (2.28) 11. Pain Management Effectiveness of measures to reduce pain during labour (3.14) 12. Clients' Satisfaction Satisfaction with treatment Satisfaction with providers' outcome for baby (4.11) attitude (3.63) 13. Outcome Live birth achieved (4.43) No injury to mother (4.3) 153 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 29 shows the six best-rated and six worst-rated indicators of quality of maternal care women received during the most pregnancy. The overall best-rated of the 47 indicators was acceptance of health insurance by health facility (4.77), which belonged to the health insurance domain. The 5 indicators that followed in descending order of rating were achievement of life birth (4.43). no injury to mother (4.3). privacy in examination room (4.14), satisfaction with treatment outcome for baby (4.11) and airy and fresh environment (4.08). The overall worst-rated indicator of quality of maternal care women received during their most recent pregnancy was home visitation after delivery at health facility (1.99). The other 5 poorly rated indicators in descending order were payment for medication at the health facility (2.28), rich clients being offered faster and better treatment (2.32), feeling discriminated against at any time for not coming from a rich background (2.46), walking long distances for medicines available at the facility (2.46) and sufficiency of doctors on duty (2.46). 154 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 29: Overall six best-rated and six worst-rated indicators of quality of maternal care women received Overall six best-rated indicators Overall six worst-rated indicators 1. Acceptance of health insurance by facility Home visitation after delivery (1.99). (4.77) 2 Life birth achievement (4.43) 2. Payment for medication bought at facility (2.28) 3 No injury to mother (4.3) 3. Rich clients offered faster and better treatment (2.32) 4 Privacy in examination room (4.14) 4. Feeling discriminated against for not having rich background (2.33) 5 Satisfaction with treatment outcome (4.11) 5. Walking long distances for medicines available at facility (2.46) 6 Airy and fresh environment (4.08) 6. Insufficiency of doctors on duty (2.55) 6.5 Women's rating oftbe quality of care domains In addition to examining women's rating of each of the 47 items that were used to assess quality of maternal care, the study assessed and compared women's rating of the quality of maternal care domains. To do this, the mean quality of care score was obtained for each domain by adding the scores for individual items and dividing the results by the number of items in each domain. Based on this mean score for each domain, the quality of care under each domain was then categorized into three scales, where a mean score of 0 -2 meant low quality; a mean score of 2.1 - 3.9 meant moderate quality; and a mean score of 4-5 meant high quality. The results are shown in Table 30. Across the 13 domains under which quality of maternal care was assessed, the two worst rated domains were pain management and amenities with average scores of 3.14 ± 1.18 and 3.20 ± l.l8 respecti vely. 155 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Specifically, about 12.31% (64/520) and 18.3% (95/520) of the respondents, respectively rated quality of "pain management domain" and "amenities domains" as low. However, the outcome domain was identified to be the best rated domain with an average score of 4.26 ± 0.57. The proportion of respondents who rated the outcome domain as low was only 0.8% (4/520). Overall, 72% of the respondents rated the quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy as high while 27% rated the quality of care as moderate. Only 0.6 % (3) of the respondents rated the overall quality of care as low as shown in Table 30. Table 30: Percentage distribution of women's rating of the quality of care domains Domains Mean ± SD Low, n(%) Moderate, n(%) High, n(%) Health facility 3.24 ± 0.94 103 (19.81) 227 (43.65) 190 (36.54) Amenities 3.20 ± 0.94 95 (18.27) 161 (30.96) 264 (50.77) Environment 4.07 ± 0.61 7 (1.35) 44 (8.46) 469 (90.19) Privacy 4.07 ± 0.80 34 (6.54) 45 (8.65) 441 (84.81) Interpersonal relationship 3.64 ± 0.45 9 (1.73) 156 (30) 355 (68.27) Human resource domain 3.31 ± 0.65 49 (9.42) 231 (44.42) 240 (46.15) Safety domain 3.91 ± 0.70 23 (4.42) 52 (10) 445 (85.58) Range of services domain 3.60 ± 0.77 38 (7.31) 125 (24.04) 357 (68.65) Health insurance services domain 3.70 ± 0.75 23 (4.42) 186 (35.77) 311 (59.81) Logistics and supplies domain 3.30 ± 0.75 45 (8.65) 239 (45.96) 236 (45.38) Pain management domain 3.14±1.18 64(12.31) 179(34.42) 277(53.27) Clients' satisfaction domain 3.92 ± 0.56 14 (2.69) 80 (15.38) 426 (81.92) Outcomes domain 4.26 ± 0.57 4 (0.77) 42 (8.08) 474 (91.15) Overall 3.64±0.32 3(0.58) 142(27.31) 375(72.12) 6.6 Rating of quality of maternal care by respondents' background characteristics Tables 31a and 31 b show the percentage distribution of the levels of quality of maternal care women received during their most recent pregnancy by background characteristics. From the table, more women aged 37-49 years (81%) rated the quality of maternal care they received during the most pregnancy as high than women aged 26-36 years (73%) and women aged 15-25 years (68%). Comparatively, more women with five or more deliveries (80.5%) rated the quality of matemal care they received in their most recent pregnancy as high than those who have had no deliveries (65.38%), 1-2 deliveries 156 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh (72.55%), and 3-4 deliveries (70.07%). More women from Tamale Metropolis (80.00%) rated quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy as high compared to those from Sagnarigu (73.88%), Kumbungu (55.56%) and Savelugu (78.46%) districts. More women from urban communities (77.27%) rated quality of maternal care high compared to those from rural communities (67.06%). Regarding educational levels of the respondents, more women with secondary level of education (82.46%) rated quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy as high than those with no formal education (67.37%), primary (73.77%) and tertiary (76.06%) levels of education. Comparatively, more women who were separated, widowed, or divorced (100.00%) rated quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy as high than those who were married, cohabiting and single (61.54%). More women who were traditionalists (100%) rated the quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy high compared to those who were Christians (78.95%) and Muslims (71.21%). In terms of tribes, more Kusaasi women rated quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy as high than Bimoba (75.00%), Dagomba (72.27%), and Mamprusi (50.00%) women. 157 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 31a: Level of quality of maternal care by respondents' background characteristics OveraD Quality of Maternal care Low,n(%) Moderate, D(%) High,D(%) Age 15 -25 1(0.62) 51(31.68) 109(67.7) 26-36 1(0.34) 80(26.94) 216(72.73) 37 -49 1(1.61) 11(17.74) 50(80.65) Number of times pregnant 1-2 1(0.38) 72(27.69) 187(71.92) 3-4 1(0.51) 56(28.28) 141(71.21 ) 5+ 1(1.61) 14(22.58) 47(75.81) Number of deliveries 0 0(0) 9(34.62) 17(65.38) 1-2 2(0.65) 82(26.8) 222(72.55) 3-4 0(0) 44(29.93) 103(70.07) 5+ 1(2.44) 7(17.07) 33(80.49) District Tamale Metro 0(0) 26(20) 104(80) Sagnarigu 1(0.75) 34(25.37) 99(73.88) Kumbungu 2(1.59) 54(42.86) 70(55.56) Savelugu 0(0) 28(21.54) 102(78.46) Residence type Urban 1(0.38) 59(22.35) 204(77.27) Rural 2(0.78) 82(32.16) 171(67.06) Educational level None 2(0.85) 75(31.78) 159(67.37) Primary 0(0) 41(26.28) 115(73.72) Secondary 0(0) 10(17.54) 47(82.46) Tertiary 1(1.41) 16(22.54) 54(76.06) Marital status Single 0(0) 5(38.46) 8(61.54) Married/Cohabiting 3(0.6) 137(27.29) 362(72.11) SeparatedIW idowedlDivorced 0(0) 0(0) Religion 5(100) Traditional 0(0) 0(0) Christianity 1(100) 0(0) Islam 12(21.05) 45(78.95) 3(0.65) Tribe 130(28.14) 329(71.21) Dagomba 3(0.66) Mamprusi 124(27.07) 331(72.27) 0(0) Bimoba 10(50) 10(50) 0(0) Kusaasi 7(25) 21(75) 0(0) 1(7.14) 13(92.86) 158 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 31 b: Level of quality of maternal care by respond en ts' background characteristics OveraU QuaUty of Maternal care . 0 Low, a(%) Moderate, n(%) High, n( Yo) Occupation Farmer 1(1.52) 21(31.82) 44(66.67) 120(73.17) Trader 1(0.61) 43(26.22) 1(0.58) 51(29.82) 119(69.59) Housewife 0(0) 10(21.28) 37(78.72) Civil Student 0(0) 4(22.22) 14(77.78) Artisan 0(0) 13(24.07) 41(75.93) Health decision maker Self 1(0.57) 53(30.29) 121(69.14) Mother-in-Iawl co-wives 0(0) 11(29.73) 26(70.27) Husband 2(0.65) 78(25.32) 228(74.03) Facility type Government 1(0.21) 125(25.99) 355(73.8) Private 2(5.13) 17(43.59) 20(51.28) Distance to nearest health facility < 30 mins walk 0(0) 53(29.78) 125(70.22) 30 mins - I hour walk 0(0) 43(23.5) 140(76.5) 1.1 - 2 hours walk 2(1.79) 30(26.79) 80(71.43) > 2 hours walk 1(2.13) 16(34.04) 26(63.83) Means of transportation Walking 1(0.42) 69(28.99) 168(70.59) BicyclelMotor cycleffricycle 2(0.98) 54(26.34) 149(72.68) Car 0(0) 19(24.68) 58(75.32) Number of ANC Visits None 1(3.7) 7(25.93) 19(70.37) I 0(0) 8(30.77) 18(69.23) 2 0(0) 14(25) 42(75) 3 0(0) 38(27.14) 102(72.86) 4+ 2(0.74) 75(27.68) 194(71.59) 6.7 Chapter summary This chapter presented results from the main survey on women's assessment of the quality of care they received during their most recent pregnancy in the Northern Region. Overall, 72% of the respondents rated the quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy as high with 27% and 0.6% rating the quality of care as moderate and low respectively. The highest-rated domain was the outcome domain with a mean score of 4.26 ± 0.57. The proportion of women who rated the outcome domain as high was 91.15% while 8.08% and 0.77% of them rated it as moderate and low respectively. The worst rated 159 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh domain among all the 13 domains was the Pain management domain, which had an average rating score of 3.14 ± 1.18. with 277(53.27%) of respondents rating it as high. 179(34.42%) rating it as moderate and 64(12.31 %) rating as low. In the next chapter. these results are discussed. 160 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER SEVEN DISCUSSION 7.1 Introduction This chapter discusses results that were presented in chapters four, five and six. The results are discussed in relation to Donabedian' s(1966) quality of healthcare model, which provided a framework for evaluating the quality of maternal care. The chapter highlights areas that researchers who are interested in maternal care studies can focus on for further research and then makes recommendations for implementation of health policies and programmes. The discussion is divided into four sections. The first section discusses what quality of maternal care means and how it should be assessed. The second section presents a contextual discussion of the findings from the development and validation process of the quality of care assessment tool. The third section discusses results from women's rating of the quality of maternal care services they received during their most recent pregnancy in the Northern Region. The final part of this chapter looks at the study's strengths and limitations. 7.2 Summary and discussion of findings on women's and healthcare providers' perspectives on quality of maternal care A central objective of this study was to examine women's and maternal care providers' understanding of what constitutes quality maternal care and how quality of maternal care should be measured in Ghana. Qualitative findings suggested that in terms of what constitutes quality maternal care during the antenatal period (ANC), both women and healthcare providers agreed that time and patience on the part of care providers to listen to clients, availability of equipment, provision of medicines, and protection of mother and unborn baby's wen-being were important markers of quality care. Most women interpreted quality ANC to mean healthcare providers having the patience to listen to clients' health 161 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh problems and provide treatment for their health needs. Women and healthcare providers also discussed quality in terms of education on general management of pregnancy and regular check-ups and monitoring by the midwives. Furthermore, results suggested that most participants explained quality of care during labour and delivery to mean the ability of the care regime to prevent and manage complications as well as ensure the mother's and baby's safety during labour and delivery. Quality care during the postnatal period was also discussed in terms of access to appropriate and timely immunization and access to appropriate general check-ups to ensure babies' welfare. [n relation to how quality of maternal care should be measured, findings revealed thirteen domains or aspects of maternal care that participants said were important for the assessment. These domains included proximity of health facilities to clients, availability of infrastructure and other amenities, availability of logistics including equipment and medicines and good environmental sanitation. The other domains were quality of the human resource/workforce, non-discriminatory provision of maternal care services, range of services and inter-personal relationship, clients' privacy, pain management and clients' involvement in the care decision-making process, mother and baby's safety, outcome of pregnancy and clients' satisfaction with the care processes and outcomes. However, healthcare providers viewed mother and baby's safety and the outcome of pregnancy to be the two most important components of quality of care, while the majority of the women agreed that inter-personal relationship and range of services were the most important. Many of the fmdings reported above are consistent with those of previous studies conducted in Ghana and other parts of the world. For instance, on access to quality antenatal care, the fmdings confirm those of Pervin et al. (2012) in Bangladesh that suggested that good quality antenatal care services lead to lower neonatal and maternal 162 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh mortality rates. Similarly, fmdings in this study elucidated that non-clinical services such as information and education during antenatal care, inter-personal relationship and clients' privacy are crucial to the success of ANC. This revelation is in consonance with Kumbani et al. (2012) in Malawi, who showed that women reported complications and poor quality of care because they were not provided with adequate information during pregnancy. The findings of this study further corroborate those of earlier studies by the Quality Commission (2008) in the UK (Kingston et al., 2011), Canada and the USA (Mac Dorman et aI., 2016). These studies have indicated that providing adequate information, being treated with respect, and having a therapeutic relationship with healthcare workers are all critical factors for ensuring high quality ANC. Additionally, the current fmdings confirm those reported earlier by Afulani (2015) in Ghana that pregnant women demanded education on risks of pregnancy complications as part of the antenatal care services they required from healthcare providers. The finding that good labour process and safe delivery denote quality maternal care services is also consistent with results from a number of previous studies (Care Quality Commission, 2018; Pervin et aI., 2012; Diamond-Brown, 2016). Globally, safe delivery is a major concern not to only expectant mothers but to researchers and healthcare policy- makers as well. Several instances of maltreatment of women during delivery have been recorded (Bohren et al., 2015). Typical cases are those in north-eastern Tanzania, where up to 28% of women reported cases of unsafe labour process (Kruk et aI., 2014). Moyer et aI. (2014) and Yakubu et al. (2014) found similar cases of maltreatment of pregnant women before and during delivery in northern Ghana. Aside maltreatment in the labour and delivery processes, a study by Sharma (2017) found poor quality of maternal care during delivery where women were being cared for by unqualified birth attendants coupled with malfeasance as informal payments influenced the quality of maternal care women 163 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh received. However, these events are often overlooked because quality of care has often focused on the health providers' perspectives and health outcomes with little attention given to the clients' perspectives (Tripathi et al., 2015). Gabrysch and Campbell (2009) disclosed that access to skilled birth attendance has the potential to reduce obstetric complications and maternal and neonatal deaths compared with women who give birth outside health facilities with no skilled assistance. However, a study in Eastern Region of Ghana on women's childbirth experiences by Adugu (2018) found that women may not patronize the services of skilled birth attendants in health facilities because of poor labour and delivery services they received. This earlier finding may explain why, in the view of the participants in this study, good labour process and safe delivery should be important components of quality maternal care in Ghana. Many participants also explained quality maternal care to mean having access to good postnatal care services. The services women receive after delivery and beyond are of paramount importance to themselves and their new-born babies (WHO, 2018). With reference to the views expressed by the participants, immunization and general child welfare services for their babies are among the components of quality maternal care. World Health Organisation recommends that mothers who have just been delivered should receive postnatal care within the first 24 hours. Newly-born babies are to be cared for within 2-3 days after birth and between days 7 andl4 as well as six weeks after birth. It is mandatory that during this period, the health status of the mother and the infant are assessed (WHO, 2018). Indeed, immunization of children, as a component of postnatal care, has been responsible for averting about 24% of the 10 million deaths that occur annually among children less than five years old (Sarker et aI., 2016). Friberg et aI. (2010) have linked over half of mortalities which occur a day after delivery to lack of quality 164 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh postnatal care. This assertion is supported by studies elsewhere (Montagu et al, 2017, Friberg et al, 2010, Black et ai, 2010, Bryce and Requejo, 2010, UNICEF, 2009). This assertion perhaps explains why many women and healthcare providers argued that the components of quality maternal care must include timely access to relevant immunisation for newborns. The findings also reflect earlier results by Black et al. (2010) that the components of quality postnatal care must include adequate warnlth, adequate nutrition, optimal feeding, better hygiene and early treatment of infections. Postnatal care is another key intervention measure for reducing child deaths caused by diarrhoea, pneumonia and malaria (Puente et aJ., 2016). However, documented evidence shows that access to quality postnatal care and other heaIthcare services is greatly influenced by the calibre of healthcare workers (Say et aI., 2009; Pitchforth et aI., 2010; Nesbitt et al., 2011; Graham & Varghese, 2012). A study in Australia by Forster et aI. (2006) found that shortage of qualified staffing was a major factor inhibiting the provision of quality postnatal care. This contention may also explain why participants in this study emphasized the importance of not only having sufficient numbers of healthcare workers but also that these healthcare workers must be qualified and properly trained with the appropriate mix of technical and inter-personal skills. Another finding of this study that require discussion relates to the distribution of the 13 domains of quality that participants reported. Generally, most of these domains fell within the process aspects of care as shown earlier in the Donabedian (1966) conceptual model. According to the Donabedian (1966) conceptual model, quality of care comprised structural, process and outcome elements. In this study, the structural dimension of quality is related to availability and provision of medicines and equipment while the outcome component is related to only mother's and baby's safety during delivery. This skew may 165 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh relate to experiences, preferences, perceptions, priorities, values, beliefs and attitudes at the community and personal levels. Clients' perceived care processes as more important than structure probably because of the tendency of poor care processes to undernline their dignity. Nevertheless, all the components identified by participants do have potential to impacts on quality of maternal care. For instance, patience on the part of healthc are providers to listen to clients offers the potential benefits of enhancing voluntary compliance rather than regimentation. particularization rather than generalization/stereotyping and boosting the client's self-respectlself-esteem rather than demoralization/ mortification. It is thus essential for maternal care providers to cultivate and sustain rapport and exchange of experiences with their clients irrespective of the disparities in their educational levels and economic statuses. Similarly, availability and provision of medicines and equipment may be associated with benefits such as effective diagnosis and treatments of cases that need special attention. aversion of self-medication, drug abuse and patronage of fake/sub- standard medicines. Other potential benefits include enhanced affordability of maternal care. Indeed, the need for adequate medication and equipment probably came out because Northern Region is one of the poorly resourced regions in the country in terms of healthcare delivery (GHS, 2017). As noted in the 2016 Northern Regional Ghana Health Service Annual Report, most health facilities in the region lack the needed medication and equipment to effectively provide maternal care services. Education on general management of pregnancy is also likely to benefit maternal care through improVed diets for mothers and babies and the avoidance of harmful medications and concoctions. Education also increases awareness among pregnant women of the need for adequate and timely rest and the danger of high workloads, stress, anxiety and other 166 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh negative psychological conditions. Also, regular check-ups and the monitoring of the unborn baby's growth could promote positive outcomes of pregnancy. Early and regular check-ups and monitoring particularly offer added benefits in respect of economic cost to the household and the community at large through diversion of human resources from economic activities to the care of an unhealthy mother and baby. In respect of access to appropriate and timely immunization, the benefits include prevention of childhood diseases (such as measles and poliomyelitis), protection of babies from the long-time effects of morbidity (such as stunting, mental retardation, paralysis and emotional dysfunction). Similarly, prevention and management of complications during labour and delivery are strongly correlated with the mother's and baby's safety during labour. Further. the two main domains that women identified as most critical for assessing quality of maternal care are inter-personal relationship and good diagnosis and treatment. This finding suggests that women are perhaps more concerned with the process dimension of care than either structure or outcome of the healthcare system. On the contrary, healthcare providers seem to be more concerned with the outcome domain (on the basis of their identification of outcome of pregnancy as the most important indicator of quality care). The disparity in areas of focus may derive from differential experiences. Clients, for instance, are less likely to be aware and concerned about the challenges related to the acquisition, operation and servicing/maintenance of the requisite equipment and logistics for maternal care, which, in healthcare providers' view, have serious effects on the outcome of pregnancy. Additionally, providers ostensibly perceive a strong correlation between their effectiveness/performance, professional ratings, personal reputation, social acceptance ratings and prestige on one hand and the outcomes of cases they handle on the other hand. On the contrary, clients are more likely to be interested in the display of empathy, respect, dignity etiquette and tact that lessen their maternity- related agonies. 167 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh This tendency could provide a justification of clients' perception of inter-personal relationship as the foremost indicator for assessing quality of maternal care. Women's views of inter-personal relationship as the most important indicator could also be explained in a culturally-grounded sense. Among the Dagombas, cordial reception by a bealthcare provider is perceived to be more prudent than the most expensive medication devoid of compassion. 7.3 Summary and discussion offindiogs on the Development and Validation of Quality Maternal Care assessment tool One of the key knowledge gaps that this study addressed relates to the lack of appropriate validated tools for assessing quality of maternal care in low-income settings like Ghana. Consequently, this study aimed to develop and validate a tool for assessing quality of maternal care. Results presented in Chapter Five showed that the 55 experts who were surveyed to evaluate the appropriateness and validity of the 57-item tool rated all the items of the construct above a content validity index (CVI) of 0.6, where 0.6 was the benchmark below which items would be rated as irrelevant/inappropriate. However, following modification and pre-testing of the tool and further reliability testing of the items in the tool using item discrimination indices, only 47 items had acceptable item discrimination indices. These items were therefore included in the final tool. Several aspects of the tool development and validation process deserve further discussion. First, the procedures for the development and validation of the tool were consistent with existing literature (Haddad et aI., 1998; McCowan & McCowan, 1999; Van Duong et aI., 2004; Abuya et ai, 2015; Sheferawet aI., 2016; Melo et aI., 2017; Carpente, 2018, Kyriazos, & Stalikas, 2018). Second, the heterogeneity of the expects in respect of age, 168 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh sex, years of working experience, and type of profession facilitated access to varied experiences. knowledge and perceptions about maternal care. This benefit, I believe, ensured that a valid and reliable tool was produced. In particular, the fact that the majority of the expert panel were females who may themselves have experienced pregnancy and maternal care services in health facilities offered access to data on personal rather than existential experiences. This access helped to enhance the tool validity and credibility. Third. the processes of elimination and substitution of indicators facilitated the production of a more dynamic, feasible and comprehensive tool rooted in local circumstances of maternal care and tailored towards local priorities. Finally, the processes adopted to develop and validate the tool and the findings, clearly support a need for the adoption of a multi-stakeholder approach to defining and assessing quality of maternal care. The participatory approach used in this study helped to mitigate the influences of prejudices, biases and misconceptions associated with differential characteristics such as sex, age, profession, place of work, number of working years and type of community. 7.4 Summary and discussion of Findings on quality of maternal care in Northern Region The central objective of this study was to assess the quality of care women received during their most recent pregnancy in Northern Region. Findings presented in Chapter Six showed that, overall, 72% of the respondents rated the quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy as high with 27% and 0.6% rating the quality of care as moderate and low respectively. The highest- best rated domain was the outcome domain with a mean score 4.26 ± 0.57. The proportion of women who rated the outcome domain as high was 91.15% while 8.08% and 0.77% of them rated it as moderate and low respectively. The worst rated domain among all the 13 domains was pain management, 169 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh which had an average rating score of 3.14:1: 1.18, with 277(53.27%) of respondents rating it as high, 179(34.42%) rating it as moderate and 64(12.31%) rating as low. Several aspects of these results deserve further discussion. First, the results in obtaining women's overall assessment of the quality of maternal care in the four selected districts in Northern Region of Ghana are consistent with those of some previous studies (Butawa et aI., (2010; WHO, 2014; Kambala et aI., 2015; Madaj. et al., 207; Brizuela, et al., 2019). Kambala et a1. (2015) specifically found in Malawi, pregnant women and nursing mothers highly rated quality of maternal care services in health facilities with an overall mean score of9/10 with the rating based on their interpersonal relations with healthcare workers, settings of the consultation rooms and nursing care services. In Kenya, Oyugi et al. (2018) found that women gave high ratings to the conduct of health workers but were indifferent about the physical facilities and resources in the hospitals. They specifically rated high quick service delivery, good management of complications and clean hospital environment. Consistent with findings in the current study, the rating reported by Oyugi et al. (2018) varies according to women's socio-demographic characteristics. Mumtaz et al. (2019) have also found in Afghanistan that, the basic socio- demographic characteristics of women such as education, economic status, location, level of self-sufficiency and ownership of means of transport were key determinants of women's varied assessment of quality of maternal care services. Indeed, the finding that women's background characteristics affected their varied assessment of quality of maternal care services is consistent with the conceptual framework of this study presented in Chapter 2. where it was hypothesized that women's socio-demographic, socio- economic, obstetric and community-level factors could affect their valuation of the quality of care they received. 170 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The finding that the outcome domain was the highest best-rated domain is not surprising given that the nature of the outcome of every pregnancy generally reflects the result of maternal care. This finding is consistent with the results of other studies (d'Arobruoso et aI., 2005; Cham et al., 2009; Srivastava et al., 2015; Kendall, 2015; Tripathi et al., 2015). Findings also indicated that the two worst-rated domains of care were pain management and amenities. In relation to pain management, it is generally acknowledged that period between labour and childbirth is one of pain for most women. Consequently, it has been recommended that health facilities should choose between a variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for the management and relief of pain (WHO, 2018). Non-pharmacological pain-relief options including manual techniques (such as massaging or application of warm packs) are recommended for healthy pregnant women who request relief of pain during labour, depending on their own preferences. WHO (2017) has therefore emphasized the need for member-countries to update their national lists of medicines to include those for management and relief of pain during labour. That pain management was poorly rated in this study is consistent with the findings in Machira, & Palamuleni's (2018) study in Malawi, where one of the ways healthcare workers maltreated pregnant women was denying them pain reliefs during and after labour. In Ghana. Amu and Nyarko (2019) found that in Ketu South District of the Volta Region, most of the women reported being given infusion by midwives to manage their pain after delivery. This strategy was deemed to be unsatisfactory as the pain did not lessen. It is also not surprising that women rated amenities poorly. The reason is that Northern Regions is one of the poorest regions in the country and also fares poorly with regard to most health indicators in Ghana (GSS/GHS, 2014). There is also inadequate provision of both human and material resources (GHS, 2017). In a region that has recorded persistent 171 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh inadequacy of health professionals, where the doctor to patent ratio is one to 51, 000 (GHS, 2017), it will surely have challenges providing basic amenities especially in inaccessible areas of the region. This contention is confirmed by Dickson and Amu (2017) who revealed that Northern Region is one of the regions in the northern sector with the least probability of pregnant women having access to skilled personnel-assisted delivery. This deprivation potentially explains why the women rated amenities poorly and it is likely to be the case given that the Ghana Health Service Report (2016) acknowledged that Northern Region was poorly resourced in terms of personnel. The findings here, however. do lend support to recommendations by World Health Organisation (2018) that health facilities should improve their physical infrastructure, basic amenities and cons urn abies in order to be able to provide quality maternal care services to their clients. As a study by Symon et al. (2018) indicated, poor provision of health facilities in Scotland contributed to the poor quality of maternal care that women received. In addition, a study in 10 low-income countries including Nigeria found that poor infrastructure and provision of resources and amenities were linked to the poor quality of maternal care that women received in health facilities. Indeed, other studies have found that the non-availability of equipment and supplies hinders quality of healthcare in general and that of maternal care in particular. Dovlo (2003), for instance, linked the exodus of healthcare workers from sub-Saharan Africa to the inadequacy of resources and amenities such as equipment and medical supplies. In Ethiopia, Kea (2018) postulated that non-availability of medical supplies and equipment tended to retard the motivation and performance of healthcare workers. Finally, 72% of the respondents rated the quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy as high. This finding is encouraging although there is space for further improvement. Taken together, the findings 172 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh here point to a need for more attention to be paid to aspects of maternal care that were poorly rated by clients. 7.5 Strengths and contribution of the Study to knowledge Quality of maternal care is an important detenninant of improved pregnancy outcomes but few empirical studies have examined how women rate the quality of maternal care services they receive at health facilities. Within this premise, this study assessed the quality of maternal care in the Northern Region of Ghana. Being one of the few studies to have focused on the assessment of quality of maternal care services, this study has made important contributions to knowledge. I. This study has added to the available literature on the quality of maternal care services women received in Northern Region. It has particularly provided additional knowledge on which aspects of care women deem to be important in both the definition and assessment of quality of care. This knowledge is critical for policy making, service delivery as well as future research on quality assessment in Ghana or similar contexts. 2. The results of the study have also given a deeper insight into which aspects of care that needs quality improvement. The study revealed that the two worst-rated domains of care were pain management and amenities. This insight is a major contribution to knowledge in this field not only in terms of which aspects of care require quality improvements but it also opens new opportunities for further research to fully understand the range of factors that affect the quality of maternal care and how and why women rated these aspects of maternal care quality as low. 3. Furthermore, the tool that has been developed and validated is a vital resource for future researchers. Before this study, such a tool did not exist, at least in the Ghanaian context. The 13 domains and 47 items that have been identified and 173 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh captured in this tool will particularly serve as important pointers to future researchers in tenns of what to look at for when undertaking assessment of quality of maternal care services. In addition. the methodological approach used to develop and validate the tool itself is an important contribution. In particular, integration of women's, healthcare providers' and experts' perspectives in the development and validation of the tool highlighted the necessity of adopting a multi-stakeholder approach to defining and assessing quality of maternal care in order to avoid and! or minimise prejudices, biases and misconceptions. 7.6 Limitations of the study Despite the strengths and contribution of this study to knowledge. there are a number of limitations. I. The design of the study was cross-sectional; hence it was not possible to study and understand how women's rating of the quality of care may change with time. 2. A retrospective self-reported method for assessing quality of care was used in this study. The retrospective nature of the assessment could have resulted in some recall biases as some respondents may have forgotten their experiences in relation to aspects of the care they received. A more participatory assessment approach whereby an independent researcher or team of experts participate in the care process of each respondent and observe and document the presence or otherwise of some of the indicators of quality would have contributed to strengthening the objectivity of the assessment. However, resource and time-constraints made it impossible to adopt an assessment approach. Future research may consider this approach. 174 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3. Finally, while the processes used to develop and validate the quality of maternal care assessment tool followed standard procedures in literature, it is possible that some aspects of care quality may not have been captured or the indicators used may not have been appropriate. 7.7 Chapter summary This chapter discussed the results that were presented in Chapters Four, Five and Six. The discussions highlighted important issues related to the quality of care that women receive in health facilities during pregnancy and childbirth, which have implications for policy, practice and research. In the next chapter, specific conclusions are drawn and recommendations made. 175 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER EIGHT CONCLUSION 8.1 Conclusion The quality of maternal care women receive during pregnancy has attracted global attention. However, tools and empirical studies on quality of maternal care women actually receive are lacking in many low-income settings including Ghana. Available literature shows that many of the current assessment tools are provider-driven, focusing mainly on the clinical care aspect of quality without considering clients' perspective. This study aimed to fill these knowledge gaps by developing and validating an assessment tool and using same to assess the quality of maternal care in four districts in Northern Region of Ghana. To achieve the objectives of the study, a sequential mixed method, cross-sectional study design was used. This design was operationalised in three phases. The first phase was a qualitative exploration of clients' and providers' perspectives on quality of maternal care. This component of the design helped to identify key indicators that were deemed relevant for assessing the quality of maternal care. The second phase of the design built on the first and involved the development and validation of a quality of care assessment tool. The final phase involved administering the maternal care quality assessment tool to women in a survey to assess quality of maternal care they received during their most recent pregnancy. Findings, which have been presented in Chapters 4, 5, and 6 and discussed in Chapter 7 revealed that women, healthcare providers and experts identified a total of 13 domains and 47 indicators that must be considered in assessing quality of care. Overall, the majority of women (72%) rated the overall quality of maternal care they received during their most 176 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh recent pregnancy as high. The highest best-rated domain was the outcome of care domain. The worst rated care domain was pain management. Taken together. several conclusions could be drawn from this study: I. The first two objectives set out to defme quality of maternal care and how it should be assessed by women and their service providers. The study revealed that good antenatal, delivery and postnatal services were identified by both women and their providers as constituting good quality maternal care. Even though thirteen domains were identified by both women and providers as important in measuring quality of maternal care, women emphasized interpersonal relationship as a critical domain in measuring quality of maternal care while their providers placed more emphasis on pregnancy outcome. The implications of these findings are that women's perspectives of quality of maternal care are not too different from those of providers. Therefore, the quality of ANC, delivery and PNC must be enhanced. The scope of inter-personal relationship, which was valued by women, must be enhanced in health facilities in delivering healthcare services. 2. Objective three sought to develop and validate a tool for measuring quality of maternal care from both women and providers and this was successfully done with 55 maternal healthcare experts who rated the 57 item tool to be above a content validity ratio of 0.06, which was deemed the benchmark. The findings indicated that women's expectations of quality maternal care were consistent with those of maternal care experts after some modifications were made. 3. The last objective was to assess the quality of care women received using the developed tool. The findings show that the majority of the women (72%) rated the quality of care they received during their last pregnancy as high. The findings 177 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh further reveal that the worst rated indicators included pain management during labour, home visitation, preferential treatment and adequacy of doctors on duty. The implication of this finding is that, even though the majority of women highly rated the services they received, more efforts and improvements are needed to meet the expectations of the close to 30% who did not rate the quality they received highly 8.2 Recommendations The following strategies are recommended for implementation by the specific groups of stakeholders to enhance the quality of maternal care in Northern Region. These recommendations are directed towards improving the quality of the maternal care system as well as research. 8.2.1 Recommendations policy and practice I. Ghana Health Service should ensure that counselling centres are made available in each facility to enable pregnant women and postnatal mothers to access such services for managing stress-related issues, tensions, anxiety and various psychological-related problems. Additionally, the need for in-service training to improve the communication skills of providers is critical for enhancing the inter-personal communication between providers and clients to enable women access the right information when they need it. 2. Home visitation was rated the poorest of all the quality of care indicators during the postnatal period. While the scope of home visitation by midwives and trained nurses certainly could be limited by shortages of birth and staff resources, Ghana Health Service should consider involving community health volunteers in outreach programmes to implement a home visitation strategy. 178 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3. Discrimination and feeling discriminated against for not being rich was another issue that many women expressed concern about. Rich clients were said to be offered faster and better treatments. It is recommended that Ghana Health Service ensures that 'a tirst come, first served policy' is implemented to reduce agitations against both perceived and real discrimination in favour of rich clients. Where practicable, an individual appointment booking system should be implemented, especially in urban centres, to avoid congestion. 4. It is recommended to Ghana Health Service to train more providers to address the doctor-patient and midwives-patient ratio gaps and put incentives in place to attract more health workers to the region. Two main forms of packages may be used: monetory and non-monetary incentives. Monetary packages may include out-station allowance, domestic staff allowance. extra duty allowance and vehicle acquisition and running maintenance allowances. Non-monetary packages may include free or subsidized accommodation, promotion or career advancement and professional capacity building opportunities targeted at healthcare providers who accept to serve in deprived rural locations. 5. To address other quality issues including inadequacy of specialists, the Ministry of Health and Ghana Health Service should consider implementing a specialist/consultant's outreach programme in deprived facilities on designated occasions. A staff exchange system on a short-term basis could also be implemented. This strategy could help facilitate learning through access to diverse professional experiences. 8.2.2 Recommendations for further research 1. This study has identified that although the majority of women rated the overall quality of care high not only is there space for further improvement but also there is need for more attention to be focused on the aspects of maternal care that women rated poorly. In this regard, the study recommends that research institutions such as the universities should 179 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh carry out research to understand the nature of care under these domains and why women rate these care domains poorly. Also, there is need for broader research to document and generate evidence on different quality of care improvement strategies. 2. The tool that has been developed from this research should be used by other researchers and students to assess the quality of maternal care within Ghana or in another African country to test the reliability and validity of the instrument. 180 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh REFERENCES Abel,1. P. (2016). Scale Development and Assessment. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 14(1), 33-44. Abuya, T., Warren, C. E., Miller, N., Njuki, R., Ndwiga, C., Maranga, A., '.' & Bellows, B. (2015). Exploring the prevalence of disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. PloS one, 10(4), e0123606. Ade\Wyi, E. 0., Auta, A., KhanaI, V .• Bamidele, O. D., Akuoko, C. P., Adefemi, K., ... & Zhao, Y. (2018). Prevalence and factors associated with underutilization of antenatal care services in Nigeria: A comparative study of rural and urban residences based on the 2013 Nigeria demographic and health survey. PLoS One, 13(5). Admasu, K., Haile-Mariam, A., & Bailey, P. (2011). Indicators for availability, utilization, and quality of emergency obstetric care in Ethiopia, 2008. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 115(1), 101-105. https:lldoi.org/l0.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.010 Adu, J., Tenkorang, E., Banchani, E., Allison, J., & Mulay, S. (2018). The effects of individual and community-level factorson maternal health outcomesin Ghana PLoSONE 13(11), e0207942. https:lldoi.org/lO.13711journal.pone.0207942 Adugu, E. (2018). Delivery in Health Facility: A Study oft he Birthing Experiences of Women in the New Juabeng Municipality (Doctoral dissertation, University Of Ghana). Afulani, P. A. (2015). Rural/urban and socioeconomic differentials in quality of antenatal care in Ghana. PloS One, 10(2), e0117996. https:lldoi.org/1O.1371/journal.pone.0117996 Afulani, P. A., Diamond-Smith, N., Golub, G., & Sudhinaraset, M. (2017). Development of a tool to measure person-centered maternity care in developing settings: validation in a rural and urban Kenyan population. Reproductive health, 14( 1), 118. Amoakoh-Coleman, M., Kayode, G. A., Brown-Davies, C., Agyepong, I. A., Grobbee, D. E., Klipstein-Grobusch, K., & Ansah, E. K. (2015). Completeness and accuracy of data transfer of routine maternal health services data in the greater Accra region. BMe research notes, 8(1),114. Amroussia, N., Hernandez, A., Vives-Cases, C., & Goicolea, I. (2017). "Is the doctor God to punish me?!" An intersectional examination of disrespectful and abusive care during childbirth against single mothers in Tunisia. Reproductive health, 14( I), 32. 181 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Amu, H., & Nyarko, S. H. (2019). Satisfaction with Maternal Healthcare Services in the Ketu South Municipality, Ghana: A Qualitative Case Study. BioMed research international,2019. Andersen, AM. N., Gundlund, A., & Villadsen, S. F. (2016). Stillbirth and congenital anomalies in migrants in Europe. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 32, 50-59. Andersen, H.M. (2004). "Villagers" Differential treatment in a Ghanaian hospital. SocSciMed 59. 2003- 2012 Anderson. E. a. (1995). Measuring service quality at a university health clinic, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 8(2), 32-37. https:lldoi.orglI0.lI08/09526869510081866 Andrews, M., & Tamboukou, M. (2013). Doing Narrative Research. (M. Andrews & M. Tamboukou, Eds.) (Second). Washington, DC: SAGE Publications, Inc. Aniebue, U. U., & Aniebue, P. N. (2011). Women's perception as a barrier to focused antenatal care in Nigeria: The issue of fewer antenatal visits. Health Policy and Planning. https:lldoi.org/10.l093/heapol/czq073 Anwar, I. (2009). Perceptions of quality of care for serious illness at different levels of facilities in a rural area of Bangladesh. Journal of Health. Population and Nutrition, 27(3), 396-405. https:lldoi.orgll0.3329/jhpn.v27i3.3382 Anwar. I., Kalim, N., & Koblinsky, M. (2009). Quality of obstetric care in public-sector facilities and constraints to implementing emergency obstetric care services: Evidence from high- and low-performing districts of Bangladesh. Journal of Health. Population and Nutrition, 27(2), 139-155. https:lldoi.orgll0.3329/jhpn.v27i2.3327 Apusigah, A. A (2009). The gendered politics of farm household production and the shaping of women's livelihoods in Northern Ghana. Feminist Africa. 12(12),51- 67. Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Lee, D., Dinsa, G., Manzi, F., Marchant, T., & Kruk, M. E. (2018). Equity in antenatal care quality: an analysis of91 national household surveys. The Lancet Global Health, 6(11), eI186-eI195. Asefa, A, & Bekele, D. (2015). Status of respectful and non-abusive care during facility- based childbirth in a hospital and health centers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reproductive health, 12{l), 33. 182 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Aseweh A .• P., Abekah-Nkrumah, G., Sakyi, K., Adjasi, C. K., & Abor, J. (2011). The socio-economic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Ghana. International Journal o/Social Economics, 38(7), 628-648. Atinga, R. A., & Baku, A. A (2013). Determinants of antenatal care quality in Ghana. International Journal o/Social Economics. Austin, A, Langer, A., Salam, R. a, Lassi, Z. S., Das, J. K., & Bhutta, Z. a. (2014). Approaches to improve the quality of maternal and newborn health care: an overview of the evidence. Reproductive Health, 11(SuppI2), S I. https://doi.orgllO.118611742-4755-11-S2-SI Awedoba, A. K. (2006). Modes of succession in the Upper East Region of Ghana. In: I.K. Odotei and A.K. Awedoba (eds.), Chieftaincy in Ghana. Culture. Governance and Development, 409-428. Accra: Sub-Saharan Publishers .. Babakus, E., & Mangold, W. G. (1992). Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation. Health Services Research, 26(6), 767-786. Babalola, S., & Fatusi, A (2009). Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria--Iooking beyond individual and household factors. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9, 43. https://doi.orglI0.1186/1471-2393-9-43 Babbie. E. R. (1973). Survey research methods. Wadsworth. Bailey, N. (1994). Towards a research agenda for public-private partnerships in the 1990s. Local Economy, 8(4), 292-306. Bailey, P. E., Szaszdi, J. A., & Glover, L. (2002). Obstetric complications: does training traditional birth attendants make a difference? Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica = Pan American Journal 0/ Public Health, 11(1), 15-23. https://doi.orgll0.1590/S1020-49892002000100003 Bailey, P., Paxton, A, Lobis, S., & Fry, D. (2006). The availability oflife-saving obstetric services in developing countries: An in-depth look at the signal functions for emergency obstetric care. International Journal o/Gynecology and Obstetrics, 93(3), 285-291. https:lldoi.orglI0.1016/j.ijgo.2006.01.028 Balarajan, Y., Selvaraj, S., & Subramanian, S. V. (2011). Health care and equity in India. The Lancet, 377(9764), 505-515. Baltussen, R. M. P. M., Ye, Y., Haddad, S., & Sauerbom, R. S. (2002). Perceived quality of care of primary health care services in Burkina Faso. Health Policy and Planning, 17(1),42-48. https:lldoi.org/lO.1093IheapoV17.1.42 183 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Bammann, K., Reisch, L. A., Pohlabeln. H., Williams, G., & Wolters, M. (2019). Core Questionnaires. In Instruments/or Health Surveys in Children and Adolescents (pp. 189-207). Springer, Cham. Banda, C. (2013). Ba"iers to utilization o//ocused antenatal care among pregnant women in Ntchisi district in Malawi (Master'S thesis). Baral, G. (2012). An assessment of the safe delivery incentive program at a tertiary level hospital in Nepal. Journal o/Nepal Health Research Council, /0(21), 118-124. Barber, S. L., & Gertler, P. J. (2009). Empowering women to obtain high quality care: Evidence from an evaluation of Mexico's conditional cash transfer programme. Health Policy and Planning, 24{ 1), 18-25. https:lldoi.org/l0.l093lheapoVczn039 Barclay, L., Kruske, S., Bar-Zeev, S., Steenk.amp, M., Josif, C., Narjic, C. W., ... & Kildea, S. (2014). Improving Aboriginal maternal and infant health services in the 'Top End'of Australia; synthesis of the findings ofa health services research program aimed at engaging stakeholders, developing research capacity and embedding change. BMC health services research, 14(1),241. Basinga, P., Gertler, P. J., Binagwaho, A., Soucat, A. L., Sturdy, J., & Vermeersch, C. M. (2011). Effect on maternal and child health services in Rwanda of payment to primary health-care providers for performance: an impact evaluation. The Lancet, 377(9775),1421-1428. Bazant. E. S., & Koenig, M. A. (2009). Women's satisfaction with delivery care in Nairobi's informal settlements. International Journal/or Quality in Health Care, 21(2), 79-86. Benova, L., Tuntyalp, 6., Moran, A. C., & Campbell, O. M. R. (2018). Not just a number: examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low-income and middle- income countries. BMJ global health, 3(2), e000779. Bensing, J. (1991). Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Social Science & Medicine, 32(11), 1301-1310. https:lldoi.org/l0.1016/0277-9536(91)90047-G Bhutta, Z. A., Chopra, M., Axelson, H., Berman, P., Boerma, T., Bryce, J., ... & de Francisco, A. (2010). Countdown to 2015-decade report (2000-10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival. The lancet, 375(9730), 2032-2044. Bhutta, Z. A., Das, J. K., Bah!, R., Lawn, J. E., Salam, R. A., Paul, V. K., ... Walker, N. (2014). Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet (London, England), 384(9940), 347-370. https:lldoi.orgllO.l016/S0140-6736(14)60792_3 184 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Bhutta, Z. A., Lassi, Z. S., Blanc, A., & Donnay, F. (2010, December). Linkages among reproductive health, maternal health, and perinatal outcomes. In Seminars in perinato!ogy (Vol. 34, No.6, pp. 434-445). WB Saunders. Binka, F. N., Nazzar, A., & Phillips, J. F. (199S). The Navrongo Community Health and Family Planning Project. Studies in Family Planning, 26, 121-139. https:lldoi.orglI0.2307/2137832 Black, M., Shetty, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2008). Obstetric outcomes subsequent to intrauterine death in the first pregnancy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 115(2), 269-274. Black, R. E., Cousens, S., Johnson, H. L., Lawn, J. E., Rudan, I., Bassani, D. G., ... & Eisele, T. (2010). Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis. The lancet, 375(9730),1969-1987. Boateng, G. 0., Neilands, T. B., FrongiIIo, E. A., Melgar-Quinonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(June), 1-18. https:lldoi.orgll0.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 Bohren, M. a., Vogel, J. P., Hunter, E. C., Lutsiv, 0., Makh, S. K., Souza, J. P., ... Gtilmezoglu, a. M. (2015). The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLOS Medicine, 12(6), elO01847. https://doi.orgllO.l371/journal.pmed.lOOI847 Boller, c., Wyss, K., Mtasiwa, D., & Tanner, M. (2003). Quality and comparison of antenatal care in public and private providers in the United Republic of Tanzania. Bulletin oft he World Health Organization, 81, 116-122. Bonso, G. L. O. R. I. A. (2015). Assessment oft he Quality ofA ntenatal Care (Anc) Services among Teenage Mothers in the Maamobi District Hospital in Accra (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghana). Bowling, A. (2014). Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Service (4th Ed). England: Open University Press. Bradshaw, D., Chopra, M., Kerber, K., Lawn, J.E., Bamford, L., et al. (2008). Every death counts: Use of mortality audit data for decision making to save the lives of mothers. babies, and children in South Africa Lancet, 371, 1294-1234. Bright, T., Felix, L., Kuper, H., & Polack, S. (2018). Systematic review of strategies to increase access to health services among children over five in low- and middle- income countries. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 18S University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh https:lldoi.orglI0.llll/tmi.13044 Brizuela, V., Leslie, H. H., Sharma, J., Langer, A., & Tun~alp, C. (2019). Measuring quality of care for all women and newborns: how do we know if we are doing it right? A review of facility assessment tools. The Lancet Global Health, 7(5). e624- e632. Broughton. E. I., Ikram, A. N., & Sahak, 1. (2013). How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study. BMJ Open, 3(4), 1-8. https:lldoi.orgllO.1136lbmjopen-2013-002554 Bryman, A. (2008). Why do researchers integrate/combine/meshlblendlmixlmerge/fuse quantitative and qualitative research. Advances in mixed methods research, 87-100. Bucagu, M., Kagubare, J. M., Basinga, P., Ngabo, F., Timmons, B. K., & Lee, A. C. (2012). Impact of health systems strengthening on coverage of maternal health services in Rwanda, 2000-2010: a systematic review. Reproductive health mailers, 20(39), 50-61. Buor, D. (1996). Reproductive decision-making in a changing Ghanaian family. The changing family in Ghana, 42-63. Bureau regional de l'Europe de l'organisation Mondiale de la sante. (1998). Indicateurs de Resultals et qualite des soins. La demarche de l'OMS. Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse education today, 1/(6),461-466. Butawa, N. N., Tukur, B., Idris, H., Adiri, F., & Taylor, K. D. (2010). Knowledge and perceptions of maternal health in Kaduna State, Northern Nigeria. African Journal o/Reproductive Health, /4(3),71-76. Calvert, C., Owolabi, 0.0., Yeung, F., Pittrof, R., Ganatra, B., Tun~alp, C.,." & Filippi, V. (2018). The magnitude and severity of abortion-related morbidity in settings with limited access to abortion services: a systematic review and meta- regression. BMJ global health, 3(3), e000692. Cammack, A. L., Buss, C., Entringer, S., Hogue, C. J., Hobel, C. J., & Wadhwa, P. D. (2011). The association between early life adversity and bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy. American journal ofo bstetrics and gynecology, 204(5), 431-e l. Cannella, H.l., O'Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2005). Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in developmental disabilities, 26(1).1-15. 186 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Carpenter. S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, J2 ( I). 25-44. Chaibva, C. N., Roos, J. H., & Ehlers, V. J. (2009). Adolescent mothers' non-utilisation of antenatal care services in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Curationis,32(3), 14-21. Cham, M., Sundby, J., & Vangen, S. (2005). Maternal mortality in the rural Gambia, a qualitative study on access to emergency obstetric care. Reproductive Health, 2,3. https://doi.org/IO.1186/1742-4755-2-3 Cham, M., Sundby, J., & Vangen. S. (2009). Availability and quality of emergency obstetric care in Gambia's main referral hospital: women-users' testimonies. Reproductive health, 6(1), 5. Chambers, V., & Booth, D. (2012). Delivering maternal health: Why is Rwanda doing better than Malawi, Niger and Uganda? Chen, L., Dai, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, Q., Rudan, D., Saftie, V., ... Scherpbier, R. W. (2013). A comparison between antenatal care quality in public and private sector in rural Hebei, China. Croatian Medical Journal, 54(2), 146-156. https://doi.org/l0.3325/cmj.2013.54.146 Chen, L., Qiong, W., van Velthoven, M. H., Yanfeng, Z., Shuyi, Z., Ye, L., ... Ting, Z. (2014). Coverage. quality of and barriers to postnatal care in rural Hebei, China: a mixed method study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, J 4, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-31 Chiba, Y., Oguttu, M. A., & Nakayama, T. (2012). Quantitative and qualitative verification of data quality in the childbirth registers of two rural district hospitals in Western Kenya. Midwifery, 28(3), 329-339. https://doi.org/1O.1016/j.midw.2011.05.005 Chimankar, D. A., & Sahoo, H. (2011). Factors influencing the utilization of maternal health care services in Uttarakhand. Studies on Ethno-Medicine, 5(3), 209-216. Chimtembo, L. K., Maluwa, A., Chimwaza, A., Chirwa, E., & Pindani, M. (2013). Assessment of quality of postnatal care services offered to mothers in Dedza district, Malawi. Open Journal o/Nursing, 03(04), 343-350. https:/ldoi.org/I 0.4236/o jn.20 13 .34046 Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006). Validity in qualitative research revisited. Qualitative research, 6(3), 319-340. Creel, L.C., Sass, J.V., & Yinger, N.V. (2009). Overview of Quality of Care in Reproductive Health: Definitions and Measurement of Quality, New Perspectives 187 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh on Quality of Care: No I: Washington DC: Population Reference Bureau. http//www.prb.org/NewperspQoc. Date access 14,2. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongfive traditions, 2. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd, 260. Creswell, J. W., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). The" movement" of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South African Journal ofE ducation, 28, 321-333. Creswell, J. W., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). The "movement" of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South Africanjournal ofe ducation, 28(3), 321-333. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). Methodological issues in conducting mixed methods research designs. Advances in mixed methods research, 66-83. Crompton, J. (2002). Post-traumatic stress disorder and childbirth. New Zealand College ofM idwives Journal, 26,17-19. Cumberlege, J., Chantier, C., Baum, A., Cornwell, J., Calderwood, C., Davies, R., & Kinnair, D. (2016). National Maternity Review. Better Births: Improving outcomes o/maternity services in England A Five Year Forward View for maternity care. Dahlberg, U., & Aune, I. (2013). The woman's birth experience-The effect of interpersonal relationships and continuity of care. Midwifery, 29(4), 407-415. d'Ambruoso, L., Abbey, M., & Hussein, J. (2005). Please understand when I cry out in pain: women's accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC public health, 5(1), 140. de longe. A., Stuijt, R., Eijke, I., & Westerman, M. J. (2014). Continuity of care: what matters to women when they are referred from primary to secondary care during labour? a qualitative interview study in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1),103. https:lldoLorgllO.11861l471-2393-14-103 De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2013). Travel and subjective well- being: A focus on findings, methods and future research needs. Transport Reviews, 33(4), 421-442. 188 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: theory and applications. 4th edn Los Angeles. Diamond-Brown, L. (2016). The doctor-patient relationship as a toolkit for uncertain clinical decisions. Social Science & Medicine, 159, 108-115. Dickson, K. S., & Amu, H. (2017). Determinants of skilled birth attendance in the northern parts of Ghana. Advances in Public Health, 2017. Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medicalcare. Mill bank Memorial Fund Quarterly, XLIV(3), 166-203. Donabedian, A. (1978). The quality of medical care. Science. https://doi.org/l0.1126/scienceAI7400 Donabedian, A. (1997). The quality of care. How can it be assessed? 1988. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 121(11), 1145-1150. Dovlo, D. (2003, September). The brain drain and retention of health professionals in Africa. In A case study preparedf or a regional training conference on Improving Tertiary education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Things That Work (pp. 23-25). Duffy, S .• & Crangle, M. (2009). Delivery room logbook - fact or fiction? Tropical Doctor. 39(3),145-149. https://doi.orglI0.1258/td.2009.080433 Duysburgh, E., Williams, A., Williams, J., Loukanova, S., & Ternmerman, M. (2014). Quality of antenatal and childbirth care in northern Ghana. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. https://doi.orgllO.l111l1471-0528.12905 Duysburgh, E., Zhang, W. H., Ye, M., Williams, A., Massawe, S., Sie, A., ... & Temmerman, M. (2013). Quality of antenatal and childbirth care in selected rural health facilities in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania: similar finding. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 18(5), 534-547. Dzakpasu, S., Soremekun, S., Manu, A., ten Asbroek, G., Tawiah, C., Hurt, L., ... & Kirkwood, B. R. (2012). Impact of free delivery care on health facility delivery and insurance coverage in Ghana's Brong Ahafo Region. PloS one, 7(11). Edward, B. (2011). Factors influencing the utilisation of antenatal care content in Uganda. Australas Med J., 4, 516-526. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articlesIPMC3562912. Edwards, C., & Saba, S. (2011). From home to hospital, a continuum of care: making progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 in rural Bangladesh. BJOG: An International Journal o/Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 118, 88-92. 189 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude fonnation and change. Journal ofp ersonality and social psychology, 59(2), 202. Ejigu, T., Woldie, M., & Kifle, Y. (2013). Quality of antenatal care services at public health facilities of Bahir-Dar special zone, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC health services research, 13(1), 443. Ekstr6m, J. (2011). The phi-coefficient, the tetrachoric correlation coefficient, and the Pearson-Yule Debate. El Hajj, H. I., Lamrini, M., & Rais, N. (2010). Quality of care between Donabedian model and IS09001V2008.lnternalional Journalfor Quality Research, 7(1), 17-30. Escuriet, R .. White, J., Beeckman, K., Frith, L., Leon-Larios, F., Loytved, C., ... Van Teijlingen, E. (2015). Assessing the perfonnance of maternity care in Europe: A critical exploration of tools and indicators. BMC Health Services Research. https:lldoi.orglIO.l186/s12913-015-1151-2 Fagbamigbe. A. F., & Idemudia, E. S. (2015). Assessment of quality of antenatal care services in Nigeria: evidence from a population-based survey. Reproductive health. 12 ( I), 88. Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2008). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. In The Oxford Handbook ofP olitical Science. Filippi. V., Ronsmans, c., Campbell, O. M., Graham, W. J., Mills, A., Borghi, J., ... & Osrin, D. (2006). Maternal health in poor countries: the broader context and a call for action. The Lancet, 368(9546), 1535-1541. Finlayson, K., & Downe, S. (2013). Why Do Women Not Use Antenatal Services in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. PLoS Medicine. https:l/doi.orglI0.1371/journal.pmed.1001373 Flood, M., & Small, R. (2009). Researching labour and birth events using health information records: methodological challenges. Midwifery, 25(6), 701-710. https:lldoi.orgllO.1016/j.midw.2007.12.003 Foglia, L. M., Nielsen, P. E., Hemann, E. A., Walker, S., Pates, J. A., Napolitano, P. G., & Deering, S. (2015). Accuracy of the Adverse Outcome Index: An obstetrical quality measure. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 41(8), 370-AP2. Ford, S. P., & Long, N. M. (2011). Evidence for similar changes in offspring phenotype following either maternal undernutrition or overnutrition: potential impact on fetal epigenetic mechanisms. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 24(1), 105-111. 190 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Forster, D. A., McLachlan, H. L., Yelland, J., Rayner, J., L':ll1lley, J., & Davey, M.-A. (2006). Staffing in postnatal units: is it adequate for the provision of quality care? Staff perspectives from a state-wide review of postnatal care in Victoria. Australia. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 83. https:lldoLorglI0.1.186/1472-6963-6-83 Friberg, I. K., Kinney, M. V., Lawn, J. E., Kerber, K. J., Odubanjo, M. 0., Bergh, A. M., ... & Black, R. E. (2010). Sub-Saharan Africa's mothers, newborns, and children: how many lives could be saved with targeted health interventions? PLoS medicine, 7(6). Friberg. I. K., Kinney, M. V., Lawn, J. E., Kerber, K. 1., Odubanjo, M. 0., Bergh, A. M., ... & Black, R. E. (2010). Sub-Saharan Africa's mothers, newborns, and children: how many lives could be saved with targeted health interventions? PLoS medicine, 7(6). Gabrysch, S., & Campbell, O. M. (2009). Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9( 1), 34. hups:lldoi.orgllO.1186/1471-2393-9-34 Ganle, J. K., & Krampah, E. (2018). Mistreatment of Women in Health Facilities by Midwives during Childbirth in Ghana: Prevalence and Associated Factors. In Selected Topics in Midwifery Care. IntechOpen. Ganle, J. K., Parker, M., Fitzpatrick, R., & Otupiri, E. (2014a,2014b). Inequities in accessibility to and utilisation of maternal health services in Ghana after user-fee exemption: a descriptive study. International Journal/or EqUity in Health, 13(1). https:lldoLorgll0.l186/s12939-014-0089-z Gething, P. W., Johnson, F. A., Frempong-Ainguah, F., Nyarko, P., Baschieri, A., Aboagye, P., ... & Atkinson, P. M. (2012). Geographical access to care at birth in Ghana: a barrier to safe motherhood. BMC public health, 12( I), 991. Ghana Health Service (2017). Family Health Division Annual Report, 2016 Ghana Health Service (2017). Health Services Annual Report, 2016. Northern Regional Ghana Health Service. (2015). Maternal Health I Ghana Health Service. Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), and ICF. (2018). Ghana Maternal Health Survey 2017: Key Findings. Rockville, Maryland, USA: GSS, GHS, and ICF. Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), and ICF International. (2015). Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Rockville, Maryland, USA: GSS, GHS, and ICF International. 191 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Ghana. Statistical Service. (2013). 2010 Pop!llation & Housing Census: Regional Analytical Report (Vol. 1). Ghana Statistical Service. Ghana. Statistical Service. (2014). 2010 population and housing census report. Sagnarigu District Analytical Report Ghana Statistical Service. Ghana. Statistical Service. (2014). 2010 population and housing census report. Kwnbungu District Analytical Report Ghana Statistical Service Ghana. Statistical Service. (2014). 2010 population and housing census report. Savelugu- Nanton Municipal Analytical Report Ghana Statistical Service Ghana. Statistical Service. (2014).2010 population and housing census report. Tamale Metropolitan Analytical Report Ghana Statistical Service. GHS. (2003). Patients Charter. Accra: Ghana Health Service. GHS. (2007). Quality Assurance Strategic Plan/or Ghana Health Service 2007-2011. Accra: Ghana Health Service. GHS. (2016a). 2015 Annual Report o/Ghana Health Service. Northern Region. Tamale. GHS. (2016b). 2016 Mid-Year Report o/Ghana Health Service. Northern Region. Tamale. GHS. (2017). 2016 Annual Report. Accra. Gibberd, R., Hancock, S., Howley, P., & Richards, K. (2004). Using indicators to quantify the potential to improve the quality of health care. International Journal/or Quality in Health Care. https:lldoi.orgll0.1093/intqhc/rnzh019 Goberna-Tricas, J., Banus-Gimenez, M. R., Palacio-Tauste, A., & Linares-Sancho, S. (20 II). Satisfaction with pregnancy and birth services: the quality of maternity care services as experienced by women. Midwifery, 27(6), e231-e237. Goode, W. J., & Hatt, P. K. (1952). Methods in social research. Graham, W. J., & Varghese, B. (2012). Quality, quality, quality: gaps in the continuwn of care. The Lancet, 379(9811), eS-e6. Graham, W. J., McCaw-Binns, A., & Munjanja, S. (2013). Translating coverage gains into health gains for all women and children: the quality care opportunity. PLoS Medicine, 10(1). Granja, A. C., Machungo, F., & Bergstrom, S. (2000). Avoidability of maternal death in Mozambique: audit and retrospective risk assessment in 106 consecutive cases. Afr J Health Sci, 7(3-4),83-87. Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2004). In-depth interviews. Qualitative methods/or health research, 2(1), 93-122. 192 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Green, J., & Thorogood, N. (2004). Qualitative Methodsfor Health Research. London: Sage Publications. Griffiths, P., & Stephenson, R. (2001). Understanding users' perspectives of barriers to maternal health care use in Maharashtra, India. Journal ofB iosocial Science, 33(3), 339-359. https:lldoi.orgll0.1 0 17/S002193200 10 0339X GSS. (2011). The 2010 Population and Housing Report. Accra. GSS. (2014a). 2010 Population and Housing Census District Analytic Reportfor Sagnarigu. Accra. GSS. (2014b). 2010 Population and Housing Census District Analytic Reportfor Tamale Metropolis. Accra. GSS/GHS. (2014). Ghana Demographic and Health Survey, key indicators. Accra, Ghana: GSSI GHSIDHS Program ICF International. GSS/GHSlMacro International. (2009). Ghana Maternal Health Survey 2007. Accra: GSS/GHSlMacro International. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Introduction to applied thematic analysis. Applied thematic analysis, 3, 20. Gupta, A. (2008). Transparency under Scrutiny: Information Disclosure in Global Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 1-7. Gupta, H. D. (2008). Identifying Health Care Quality Constituents: Service Provider's Perspective. Journal ofM anagement Research, 8, 18-28. Guzha, B. T., Magwali, T. L., Mateveke, B., Chirehwa, M., Nyandoro, G., & Munjanja, S. P. (2018). Assessment of quality of obstetric care in Zimbabwe using the standard primipara. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 18(1), 205. Haddad, S., Fournier, P., & Potvin, L. (1998). Measuring lay people's perceptions of the quality of primary health care services in developing countries. Validation of a 20- item scale. International Journalfor Quality in Health Care, 10(2), 93-104. Hadjigeorgiou, E., & Coxon, K. (2014). In Cyprus,'midwifery is dying ... '. A qualitative exploration of midwives' perceptions of their role as advocates for normal childbirth. Midwifery, 30(9), 983-990. Hagey, J., Rulisa, S., & Perez-Escamilla, R. (2014). Barriers and solutions for timely initiation of antenatal care in Kigali, Rwanda: Health facility professionals' perspective. Midwifery. https:lldoi.orgll0.l016/j.midw.2013.01.016 Ham, C., & Alderwick, H. (2015). Place-based systems ofc are: away forwardfor the NHS in England. King's Fund. 193 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Harvey, S., Rach, D., Stainton, M. C., Jarrell, J., & Brant, R. (2002). Evaluation of satisfaction with midwifery care. Midwifery, 18(4).260-267. https:lldoi.orgllO.l0S4/midw.2002.0317 Hawkes. N. (2018). CQC inspections have "little measurable impact" on services, analysis finds. Hayes, I., Enohumah, K., & McCaul, C. (2011). Care of the migrant obstetric population. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 20(4), 321-329. Healthcare Commission (2008). Report on Self-Reported Experiences of Patients from Black and Minority Ethnic Groups, London: Department of Health. Healthcare Commission. (2008). Towards better births: a review ofm aternity services in England. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection. Heikkilll, K., Sacker, A., Kelly, Y., Renfrew, M. J., & Quigley. M. A. (2010). 012 Breast feeding and behavioural development in children: findings from the Millennium Cohort Study. Journal ofE pidemiology & Community Health, 64(Suppll), AS-AS. Hermida, J., Nicholas, D. D., & Blumenfeld, S. N. (1999). Comparative validity of three methods for assessment of the quality of primary health care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal oft he International Society for Quality in Health Care /ISQua, 11(5),429-433. Hodnett, E. D. (2002). Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(5), S 160- S 172. https:lldoLorgllO.1016/S0002-9378(02)70189-0 Hoope-Bender, P., Liljestrand, J., & MacDonagh, S. (2006). Human resources and access to maternal health care. International Journal ofGynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ oft he International Federation ofGynaecology and Obstetrics, 94(3), 226-233. https:lldoi.orgllO.l 0 16/j.ijgo.2006.04.003 Hulton, L., Matthews, Z., & Stones, R. W. (2000). A framework for the evaluation of quality of care in maternity services. Reproductive Health Matters, 8( 16), 197. Hunter, 8., Berg, M., Lundgren, 1., 0lafsd6ttir, O. A., & Kirkham, M. (2008). Relationships: the hidden threads in the tapestry of maternity care. Midwifery, 24(2), 132-137. Hyman, H. H., Cobb, W. J., Feldman, J. J., Hart, C. W., & Stember, C. H. (1954). Interviewing in social research. Chicago: Univer. Ijadunola. K. T., Fatusi, A. 0., OJji, E. 0., Adeyemi, A. B., Owolabi, O. 0., Ojofeitimi, E. 0., ... & Adewuyi, A. A. (2007). Unavailability of essential obstetric care services 194 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh in a local government area of south-west Nigeria. Journal ofh ealth. population, and nutrition, 25(1),94. Jabnoun, N., & Chaker, M. (2003). Comparing the quality of private and public hospitals. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 13(4),290-299. Jackson, J. L., Chamberlin, J., & Kroenke, K. (2001). Predictors of patient satisfaction. Social Science and Medicine, 52, 609-620. https:lldoi.orgll0.l016/S0277- 9536(00)00164-7 Jolly, M., Sequeira, W., Block., J. A., Toloza, S., Bertoli, A., Blazevic,I., ... & Cicognani. E. (2019). Sex Differences in Quality of Life in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis care & research. 71 (12), 1647-1652. Jordan, S., Emery, S .• Bradshaw, C., Watkins, A., & Friswell, W. (2005). The impact of intrapartum analgesia on infant feeding. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaec%gy, 112(7),927-934. Joshi, C., Torvaldsen, S., Hodgson. R., & Hayen, A. (2014). Factors associated with the use and quality of antenatal care in Nepal: a population-based study using the demographic and health survey data. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 14(1), 94. Kambala, C., Lohmann, J., Mazalale, J., Brenner, S., De Allegri, M., Muula, A. S., & Sarker, M. (2015). How do Malawian women rate the quality of maternal and newborn care? Experiences and perceptions of women in the central and southern regions. BMCpregnancyandchildbirth, 15(1),169. Kanengoni, B., Andajani-Sutjahjo, S., & Holroyd, E. (2019). Women's experiences of disrespectful and abusive maternal health care in a low resource rural setting in eastern Zimbabwe. Midwifory, 76, 125-131. Karlstrom. A., Nystedt, A., & Hildingsson, I. (2015). The meaning ofa very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 1-8. https://doi.orgll0.1186/s12884-015-0683-0 Kasiulevicius. V .• Sapoka, V., & Filipaviciiite, R. (2006). Sample size calculation in epidemiological studies. Theory and Practice, 7, 225-231. Kea, A. Z., Tulloch, 0., Datiko, D. G., Theobald, S., & Kok, M. C. (2018). Exploring barriers to the use of formal maternal health services and priority areas for action in Sidama zone, southern Ethiopia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 18(1),96. Keating, A., & Fleming, V. E. (2009). Midwives' experiences of facilitating normal birth in an obstetric-led unit: a feminist perspective. Midwifory, 2.5(5), 518-527. 195 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Kendall, T. (2015). Critical Maternal Health Knowledge Gaps in low- and middle-income countries for post-20i5: Researchers' perspectives. Boston. Kendall, T., & Langer. A. (2015). Critical maternal health knowledge gaps in low- and middle-income countries for the post-2015 era. Reproductive Health, 12(1),55. https:lldoi.org/l0.1186/s12978-015-0044-5 Khan. K., & Wojdyla, D .. & Say, L.. & GOlmezog!u, A.,& Van Look, P. (2006). WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: A systematic review. Lancet. 367. 1066-74. 10. 1o 1 6/S0140-6736(06)68397-9. Kingston, D., Heaman, M., Chalmers, B., Kaczorowski, J., O'Brien, B., Lee, L., ... & Maternity Experiences Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. (2011). Comparison ofmatemity experiences of Canadian-born and recent and non-recent immigrant women: findings from the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. Journal of Obstetrics and gynaecology Canada, 33(11), 1105- HIS. Kinney, M.V., Kerber, K.J., Black. R.E., Cohen, B., Nkrumah, F., Coovadia. H. (2010). Sub-Saharan Africa's mothers, newborns, and children: where and why do they die? PLoS Med., 7: eI000294-10.137I1journal.pmed.1000294 Kirkup, B. (2015). The Report oft he Morecambe Bay Investigation: An independent investigation into the management, delivery and outcomes ofc are provided by the maternity and neonatal services at the University Hospitals ofM orecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trustfrom January 2004 to June 2013. Stationery Office. Kohi, T. W., Mselle, L. T., Dol, J., & Aston, M. (2018). When, where and who? Accessing health facility delivery care from the perspective of women and men in Tanzania: a qualitative study. BMC health services research, 18(1), 564. Koopman-Esseboom, C., Morse, D. C., Weisglas-Kuperus, N., Lutkeschipholt, I. J., Van Der Paauw, C. G., Tuinstra, L. G., ... & Sauer, P. J. (1994). Effects of dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls on thyroid hormone status of pregnant women and their infants. Pediatric research, 36(4), 468-473. Kow, F., Motohiro, T., Doe, P. E., & Sri Heruwati, E. (2017). Quality assurance. In Fish Drying and Smoking: Production and Quality. https:lldoi.org/l0.1201/9780203756003 Kruk, M. E., Mbaruku, G., McCord, C. W., Moran, M., Rockers, P. C., & Galea, S. (2009). Bypassing primary care facilities for childbirth: A population-based study in rural Tanzania. Health Policy and Planning, 24(4), 279-288. 196 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh hups:/IdoLorgil 0.1 093/heapoVczpO 11 Kruk, M., Kujawski, S., Mbaruku, G., Ramsey, K., Moyo, W., & Freedm. (2014). Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy and Planning, 1-8. https:lldoi.org/10.1093/heapoVczu079 Kumbani, L. C., Chirwa, E., Odland, J. 0., & Bjune, G. (2012). Do Malawian women critically assess the quality of care? A qualitative study on women's perceptions of perinatal care at a district hospital in Malawi. Reproductive health, 9(1), 30. Kwambai, T. K., Dellicour, S., Desai. M., Ameh, C. A., Person, 8., Achieng, F., ... ter Kuile, F. O. (2013). Perspectives of men on antenatal and delivery care service utilisation in rural western Kenya: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. bttps:lldoLorg/l0.1186/1471-2393-13-134 Kwegyir-Afful, E., Adu, G., Spelten, E. R., rutsAnen, K., & Verbeek, J. (2018). Maternity leave duration and adverse pregnancy outcomes: An international country-level comparison. Scandinavianjournal ofp ublic health, 46(8), 798-804. Kyei, N. N., Chansa, C., & Gabrysch, S. (2012). Quality of antenatal care in Zambia: a national assessment. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 12( I), 151. Kyriazos, T. A., & Stalikas, A. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: The Steps of Scale Development and Standardization Process. Psychology, 09(11), 2531-2560. https:lldoi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.911145 Lain, S. J., Hadfield, R. M., Raynes-Greenow, C. H., Ford, J. B., Mealing, N. M., Algert, C. S., & Roberts, C. L. (2012). Quality of Data in Perinatal Population Health Databases. Medical Care. https:lldoLorglIO.l097IMLR.ObOI3e3182Id2bld Laverty, S. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal ofQ ualitative Methods. 2(3), 1-29. Lawn, J. E., Lee, A. C. C., Kinney, M., Sibley, L., Carlo, W. A., Paul, V. K., ... Darmstadt, G. L. (2009). Two million intrapartum-related stillbirths and neonatal deaths: Where, why, and what can be done? In International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Vol. 107). https:lldoi.orgll 0.1 0 16/j.ijgo.2009. 07.016 Leckenby, J. D., & Plummer, J. T. (1983). Advertising stimulus measurement and assessment research: A review of advertising testing methods. Current issues and research in advertiSing, 6(2), 135-165. 197 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Lim, P. C., & Tang, N. K. (2000). A study of patients' expectations and satisfaction in Singapore hospitals. International Journal ofH ealth Care Quality Assurance Incorporating Leadership in Health Services, 13(6-7),290-299. https:/ldoi.org/10.II08/09526860010378735 Lim, S. S., Dandona, L., Hoisington, J. A., James, S. L., Hogan, M. C., & Gakidou. E. (2010). India's Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. The Lancet, 375(9730), 2009-2023. https:lldoi.org/l0.1016/S0140-6736(10)60744-1 Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas oft he Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Lopez, K. • & Willis, D. (2004). Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contribution to nursing knowledge. Quality Health Research, 4, 726-735. Lundgren, I., & Dahlberg, K. (2002). Midwives' experience of the encounter with women and their pain during childbirth. Midwifery, 18(2), 155-164. Lungu. F., Malata, A., Chirwa, E., Mbendera, I. (2011). Quality assessment of focused antenatal care services in Malawi. AfrJ Midwifery & Womens Health.. 5, 169-175. Mac Dorman, M. F., Declercq, E., Cabral, H., & Morton, C. (2016). Is the United States maternal mortality rate increasing? Disentangling trends from measurement issues Short title: US Maternal Mortality Trends. Obstetrics and gynecology, 128(3),447. Machira, K., & Palamuleni, M. (2018). Women's perspectives on quality of maternal health care services in Malawi. International journal ofw omen's health, 10, 25. Madaj, B., Smith, H., Mathai, M., Roos, N., & van den Broek, N. (2017). Developing global indicators for quality of maternal and newborn care: a feasibility assessment. Bulletin oft he World Health Organization, 95(6), 445. Magoma, M., Requejo, J., Campbell, O. M. R., Cousens, S., & Filippi, V. (2010). High ANC coverage and low skilled attendance in a rural Tanzanian district: A case for implementing a birth plan intervention. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. https:lldoi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-1O-13 Mason, J. (2006). Six strategies for mixing methods and linking data in social science research. Maxwell, R. J. (1992). Dimensions of quality revisited: from thought to action. Quality in Health Care: QHC, 1(3), 171-177. https:lldoi.org/10.1136/qshc.1.3.171 McConville, B. (2014). Respectful maternity care-How the UK is learning from the developing world. Midwifery, 30(2),154-157. 198 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh McCourt, C., Stevens, T., Sandall, J., & Brodie, P. (2006). Working with women: developing continuity of care in practice. The new midwifery: Science and sensitivity in practice, 2, 141-166. McCowan, R. J., & McCowan, S. C. (1999). Item Analysis for Criterion-Referenced Tests. Online Submission. McKenzie-Mcharg, K., & Rowe, R. (2014). Antenatal care. In Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. Second Edition. https:lldoi.orgll0.1017/CB09780511543579.123 McMahon, S. A., George, A. S., Chebet, J. J., Mosha, 1. H., Mpembeni, R. N., & Winch, P. J. (2014). Experiences of and responses to disrespectful maternity care and abuse during childbirth; a qualitative study with women and men in Morogoro Region, Tanzania. RMC pregnancy and childbirth, 14(1),268. Melo, Denise da Silva, Rene Duarte Martins, Renata Patricia Freitas Soares de Jesus, Isabella Chagas Sarnico, and Antonio Carlos Gomes do Espirito Santo. (2017). "Assessment of the responsiveness ofa public health service from the perspective of older adults." Revis/a de saude publica 51: 62. Menon, J., Musonda, V., & Glazebrook, C. (2010). Perception of care in Zambian women attending community antenatal clinics. Educational Research, 1(9), 356-362. Miller, S., Cordero, M., Coleman, A. L., Figueroa, J., Brito-Anderson, S., Dabagh, R., ... Nunez, M. (2003). Quality of care in institutionalized deliveries: The paradox of the Dominican RepUblic. In/ernational Journal ofG ynecology and Obstetrics, 82( 1), 89-103. https://doi.org/l0.1 0 16/S0020-7292(03)00 148-6 Mills, S., Williams, J. E., Wak, G., & Hodgson, A. (2008). Maternal mortality decline in the Kassena-Nankana district of Northern Ghana. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12(5), 577-585. https:lldoi.org/lO.1007/s10995-007-0289-x Ministry of Health Ghana (2008). National Consultative Meeting on the Reduction of Maternal Mortality in Ghana: Partnership for Action. Miteniece, E., Pavlova, M., Shengelia, L., Rechel, B., & Groot, W. (2018). Barriers to accessing adequate maternal care in Georgia: a qualitative study. RMC health services research, 18( 1), 631. Mngadi, P. T., Thembi, 1. T., RansjO-Arvidson, A. B., & Ahlberg, B. M. (2002). Quality of maternity care for adolescent mothers in Mbabane, Swaziland. International Nursing Review, 49(1),38-46. 199 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Montagu, D., Sudhinaraset, M., Diamond-Smith, N., Campbell, 0., Gabrysch, S .. Freedman, L., ... & Donnay, F. (2017). Where women go to deliver understanding the changing landscape of childbirth in Africa and Asia. Health policy and planning, 32(8), 1146-1152. Morgan, D. L. (2013). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Sage publications. Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Nursing research: The application a/qualitative approaches. Nelson Thomes. Mosadeghrad, A. M. (2013). Healthcare service quality: towards a broad definition. International Journal 0/ Health Care Quality Assurance, 26(3), 203-219. https:lldoi.orgll0.1108/09526861311311409 Motlagh, M. E., Torkastani, F., Ashrafian Amiri, H., Rabiee, S. M., Radpooyan, L., Nasrollahpour Shirvani, S. D., & Hassanzadeh Rostarni, Z. (2018). Factors Affecting Maternal Satisfaction from the Services of the First Level of Network System in Iran. Iranian Journal o/Epidemiology, 13(4),273-282. Moyer, C. A., & Mustafa, A. (2013). Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub- Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reproductive health, 10(1),40. Moyer. C. A., Adongo, P. B., Aborigo, R. A., Hodgson, A., & Engmann, C. M. (2014). "They treat you like you are not a human being": Maltreatment during labour and delivery in rural northern Ghana. Midwifery, 30(2), 262-268. https:lldoi.org/l0.l 0 16/j.midw.2013 .05.006 Moyer, C. A., Adongo, P. 8., Aborigo, R. A., Hodgson, A., Engmann, C. M., & Devries, R. (2014). "it's up to the woman's people": How social factors influence facility- based delivery in Rural Northern Ghana. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(1), 109-119. https:lldoLorg/l0.l007/s10995-013-1240-y Moyer, C. A., McLaren, Z. M., Adanu, R. M., & Lantz, P. M. (2013). Understanding the relationship between access to care and facility-based delivery through analysis of the 2008 Ghana Demographic Health Survey. International Journal o/Gynecology and Obstetrics, 122(3),224-229. https:lldoLorg/l0.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.005 Mpembeni, R. N., Killewo, J. Z., Leshabari, M. T., Massawe, S. N., Jahn, A., Mushi, D., & Mwakipa, H. (2007). Use pattern of maternal health services and detenninants of skilled care during delivery in Southern Tanzania: implications for achievement of MDG-5 targets. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 7(1),29. 200 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Mrisho, M., Obrist. B., Schellenberg, J. A., Haws, R. A, Mushi. A K., Mshinda, H., ... Schellenberg, D. (2009). The use of antenatal and postnatal care: perspectives and experiences of women and health care providers in rural southern Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9, lO. https:lldoi.org/l0.118611471-2393-9-10 Mselle, L. T., Moland, K. M., Mvungi, A, Evjen-Olsen, B., & Kohi, T. W. (2013). Why give birth in health facility? Users' and providers' accounts of poor quality of birth care in Tanzania. BMC Health Services Research, 13, 174. https:lldoLorgll0.1186/1472-6963-13-174 Muchabaiwa, L., Mazambani, D., Chigusiwa, L., Bindu, S., & Mudavanhu, V. (2012). Determinants of maternal healthcare utilization in Zimbabwe. International journal ofe conomic sciences and applied research, 5(2), 145-162. Muchie, K.F. (2017). Quality of antenatal care services and completion of four or more antenatal care visits in Ethiopia: a finding based on a demographic and health survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17,300. Mueller, D. H., Lungu, D., Acharya, A, & Palmer, N. (2011). Constraints to implementing the essential health package in Malawi. PloS one, 6(6). Mumtaz, S., Bahk, J., & Khang, Y. H. (2019). Current status and determinants of maternal healthcare utilization in Afghanistan: Analysis from Mghanistan Demographic and Health Survey 2015. PloS one, 14(6), e0217827. Mwaniki, M. K., Vaid, S., Chome, I. M., Arnolo, D., Tawfik, Y., Coaches, K. I., ... Jumapili, R. (2014). Improving service uptake and quality of care of integrated maternal health services: The Kenya kwale district improvement collaborative. BMC Health Services Research. https:lldoi.org/l0.l186/1472-6963-14-416 Mwase, T., Brenner, S., MazaIale, J., Lohmann, J., Hamadou, S., Somda, S. M., ... & De AUegri, M. (2018). Inequities and their determinants in coverage of maternal health services in Burkina Faso. International journal for equity in health, 17( 1), 58. Nair, M., Ariana, P., & Webster, P. (2012). What influences the decision to undergo institutional delivery by skilled birth attendants? A cohort study in rural Andhra Pradesh, India. Nesbitt, R. C., Lohela, T. J., Manu, A., Vesel, L., Okyere, E., Edmond, K., ... Gabrysch, S. (2013a). Quality along the continuum: a health facility assessment of intrapartum and postnatal care in Ghana. PloS One, 8(11), e8lO89. https:lldoi.org/lO.1371Ijournal.pone.0081089 201 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Nesbitt, R. C., Lohela. T. J., Manu, A., Vesel, L., Okyere, E .• Edmond, K., ... Gabrysch. S. (2013b). Quality along the continuum: A health facility assessment of intrapartum and postnatal care in Ghana. PLoS ONE. https:lldoi.org/l0.1371/journal.pone.0081089 Ngomane. S., & Mulaudzi, F. M. (2012). Indigenous beliefs and practices that influence the delayed attendance of antenatal clinics by women in the Bohlabelo district in Limpopo, South Africa. Midwifory, 28(1), 30-38. NIPH. (2013). Harmonized reproductive health registries. Oslo. Nishimura, T., Takei, N., Tsuchiya. K. J., Asano, R., & Mori, N. (2016). Identification of neurodevelopmental trajectories in infancy and of risk factors affecting deviant development: a longitudinal birth cohort study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45(2), 543-553. Nsiah-Asare, A. (2017). The health sector in Ghana: facts and figures 2017. Ghana Health Service. Accra. Nwaeze, l. L., Enabor, O. 0., Oluwasola, T. A. 0., & Aimakhu, C. O. (2013). Perception and satisfaction with quality of antenatal care services among pregnant women at the university college hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Annals ofI badan postgraduate medicine, 11(1), 22-28. Nyathi, L.. Tugli, A. K., Tshitangano, T. G., & Mpofu, M. (2017). Investigating the accessibility factors that influence antenatal care services utilisation in Mangwe district, Zimbabwe. African journal ofp rimary health care & family medicine, 9(1), 1-5. Nyonator, F., Awoonor-williams, J., Phillips, J., Jones, T., & Miller, R. (2005). The Ghana Community-based Health Planning and Services Initiative for scaling up service delivery innovation. Health Policy and Planning, 20(1), 25-34. https:lldoi.org/10.1093Iheapollczi003 Nyonator, F., Jones, T. C., Miller, R. A., Phillips, J. F., & Awoonor-Williams, J. K. (2005). Guiding the Ghana Community-based Health Planning and Services Approach to Scaliing up with Qualitative Systems Appraisal. The International Quarterly ofC ommunity Health Education. https:lldoi.org/10.2190INGM3-FYDT- 5827-MLlP Oakley. A. (1986). The Captured Womb: A History oft he Medical Care ofP regnant Women. New York: Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publisher Ltd. https:lldoi.orgll0.2307/2071662 202 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh O'Hare, B., Makuta, I., Chiwaula. L., & Bar-Zeev, N. (2013). Income and child mortality in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal oft he Royal Society ofM edicine, 106( 10 ), 408-414. Okafor, C. B., & Rizzuto, R. R. (2015). Women's and health-care providers' views of maternal practices and services in rural Nigeria. Studies in Family Planning, 25(6 Pt 1),353-361. https:lldoi.org/10.2307/2137879 Okafor, I. P., Sekoni, A. 0., Ezeiru, S. S., Ugboaja. J. 0., & Inem, V. (2014). Orthodox versus unorthodox care: a qualitative study on where rural women seek healthcare during pregnancy and childbirth in Southwest, Nigeria. Malawi Medical Journal, 26(2), 45-49. Okiwelu, T., Hussein, J., Adjei, S., Arhinful, D., & Armar-Klemesu, M. (2007). Safe motherhood in Ghana: Still on the agenda? Health Policy, 84(2-3),359-367. Oladapo, O. T .• Iyaniwura, C. A., & Sule-Odu, A. O. (2008). Quality of antenatal services at the primary care level in southwest Nigeria. African Journal ofR eproductive Health, 12(3). O'Neil, S., Naeve, K., & Ved, R. (2017). An Examination of the Maternal Health Quality of Care Landscape in India. Mathematica Policy Research, 2. Oyugi, B., Kioko, U., Kaboro, S. M., Okumu, C., Ogola-Munene, S., Kalsi, S., & Ranji, M. (2018). A facility-based study of women' satisfaction and perceived quality of reproductive and maternal health services in the Kenya output-based approach voucher program. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 18( I), 310. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, A. V. (1991). Refinement and Reassessment of the Servqual Scale. Journai/ ofR etailing, 67(4), 420-450. https:lldoi.orgll0.l111/j.1438-8677.2010.00335.x Parfin, B. A. (1996). Using Spradley: an ethnosemantic approach to research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(2), 341-349. Parkhurst, J. 0., & Ssengooba, F. (2009). Assessing access barriers to maternal health care: measuring bypassing to identify health centre needs in rural Uganda. Health Policy and Planning, 24(5), 377-384. https:lldoi.org/10.1093Iheapollczp023 Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health services research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189. Paulden, M., Palmer, S., Hewitt, C., & Gilbody, S. (2009). Screening for postnatal depression in primary care: cost effectiveness analysis. Bmj, 339, b5203. Rivett, M., & Street, E. (2009). Family therapy: 100 /cey points and techniques. Routledge. 203 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Pearson, J. C. (1992). On the position of the digenean family Heronimidae: an inquiry into a cladistic classification of the Digenea. Systematic Parasitology, 21(2), 81-166. Pefiacoba-Puente, C., Carmona-Monge, F. J., Marin-Morales, D., & Gallardo, C. E. (2016). Evolution of childbirth expectations in Spanish pregnant women. Applied Nursing Research, 29, 59-63. Pence, B. W., Nyarko, P., Phillips, J. F., & Debpuur, C. (2007). The effect of community nurses and health volunteers on child mortality: the Navrongo Community Health and Family Planning Project. Scandinavian Journal ofP ublic Health, 35(6), 599- 608. https://doi.orgll0.1080114034940701349225 Pervin, J., Moran, A., Rahman, M., Razzaque, A., Sibley, L., Streatfield, P. K., ... & Rahman, A. (2012). Association of antenatal care with facility delivery and perinatal survival-a population-based study in Bangladesh. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 12(1), 111. Petrou, S., Mehta, Z., Hockley, C., Cook-Mozaffari, P., Henderson, J., & Goldacre, M. (2003). The impact of pre term birth on hospital inpatient admissions and costs during the first 5 years oflife. Pediatrics, 112(6), 1290-1297. Phillimore, J. (2015). Delivering maternity services in an era of superd iversity: the challenges of novelty and newness. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(4),568-582. Pitchforth, E., Lilford, R. J., Kebede, Y., Asres, G., Stanford, C., & Frost, J. (2010). Assessing and understanding quality of care in a labour ward: a pilot study combining clinical and social science perspectives in Gondar, Ethiopia. Social science & medicine, 71(10), 1739-1748. Pitter, C., Latibeaudiere, S., Rae, T., & Owens, L. (2017). Disrespectful maternity care: a threat to the maternal health 2030 Agenda in Jamaica. Int J Womens Health Well, 3(057), 1353-2474. Pittrof, R., Campbell, O.M., & Filippi, V.G. (2002). What is quality in maternity care? An international perspective. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 81(4),277-83. Plano Clark, V. L., Huddleston-Casas, C. A., Churchill, S. L., O'Neil Green, D., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). Mixed methods approaches in family science research. Journal of Family Issues, 29(11), 1543-1566. PMNCH. (2006). Opportunities for Africa's Newborns. Practical data, policy and programmatic support for newborn care in Africa. Geneva, Switzerland. bttps://doi.orgll 0.1 0 16/S0140-6736(86)91254-7 204 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Powell-Jackson, T., Neupane, B. D., Tiwari, S., Tumbahangphe, K., Manandhar. D .• & Costello. A. M. (2009). The impact of Nepal's national incentive programme to promote safe delivery in the district of Makwanpur. Advances in Health Economic and Health Services Research, 21, 221-249. https:lldoi.org/l0.1186/1472-6963-9. 97 Rainey, H., Ehrich, K., Mackintosh, N., & Sandall, J. (2015). The role of patients and thei relatives in 'speaking up'about their own safety-a qualitative study of acute illness. Health Expectations. 18(3),392-405. Randive, B., Diwan, V., & De Costa, A. (2013). India's Conditional Cash Transfer Programme (the JSY) to Promote Institutional Birth: Is There an Association between Institutional Birth Proportion and Maternal Mortality? PLoS ONE, 8(6). https:lldoi.orgllO.13711joumal.pone.0067452 Rani, M., & Harvey, S. (2007). Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India. International Journal/or Quality in Health Care, 20(1). 62-71. https:lldoi.orglIO.1 093/intqhc/mzm052 Ransom. S .• Joshi, M., & Nash, D. (2005). The Healthcare quality book Vision, Strategy, and Tools. Chicago: Health Administration Press. Raven, J. H., Tolhurst. R. J., Tang, S., & van den Broek, N. (2012). What is quality in maternal and neonatal health care? Midwifery, 28(5), e676-e683. https:lldoi.orglI0.l016/j.midw.2011.09.003 Raven. J., van den Broek, N., Tao, F., Kun, H., & Tolhurst, R. (2015). The quality of childbirth care in China: women's voices: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, 15( I). https:lldoi.orgll 0.1186/s 12884-0 15-0545-9 Redshaw, M., & Heikkila, K. (2010). Delivered With Care. A National Survey of Women's Experience of Maternity Care 2010. Redshaw, M., Martin, C. R., Savage-McGlynn, E., & Harrison, S. (2019). Women's experiences of maternity care in England: preliminary development of a standard measure. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 19( I), 167. Renfrew, M. J., McFadden, A., Bastos, M. H., Campbell, J., Channon. A. A., Cheung, N. F., ... & McCormick, F. (2014). Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. The Lancet, 384(9948), 1129-1145. Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008). Cross-Sectional Versus Longitudinal Survey Research: Concepts, Findings, and Guidelines. 205 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Journal a/Marketing Research. 45(3), 261-279. https://doi.orgll0.1509/jmkr.45.3.261 Ronsmans, C., Graham, W. J., & Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. (2006). Maternal mortality: who, when. where, and why. The lancet, 368(9542), 1189- 1200. Rosenblatt. P. C. (1995). Ethics of qualitative interviewing with grieving families. Death Studies, 19, 139-155. https:lldoi.orgll0.1080107481189S08252721 Rowe, A. K., de Savigny, D., Lanata, C. F., & Victora, C. G. (2005). How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings? Lancet. 366(9490), 1026-1035. https:lldoLorg/l0.1016/S0140-6736(05)67028-6 Sabuncuoglu, 0., & Basgul, A. (2016). Pregnancy health problems and low birth weight associated with maternal insecure attachment style. Journal o/health psychology, 21(6), 934-943. Sacks, E., Masvawure. T. B., Atuyambe, L. M., Neema, S., Macwan'gi, M., Simbaya, J., & Kruk, M. (2017). Postnatal care experiences and barriers to care utilization for home-and facility-delivered newborns in Uganda and Zambia. Maternal and child health journal, 21(3), 599-606. Salinas, A. M., Coria.!., Reyes, H., & Zambrana, M. (1997). Effect Of Quality of Care on Preventable Perinatal Mortality. International Journal/or Quality in Health Can, 9(2). Sarker, B. K., Rahman, M., Rahman, T., Hossain, J., Reichenbach, L., & Mitra, D. K. (2016). Reasons for preference of home delivery with traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in Rural Bangladesh: A qualitative exploration. PLoS ONE. https:/ldoi.orgll0.1371/journal.pone.0146161 Say, L., Souza, J. P., & Pattinson, R. C. (2009). Maternal near miss-towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaec%gy, 23(3), 287-296. Seljeskog, L., Sundby, J., & Chimango, J. (2006). Factors influencing women's choice of place of delivery in rural Malawi--an explorative study. African Journal 0/ Reproductive Health, 10(3),66-75. https:lldoLorgll0.4314/ajrh.vl0i3.7900 Shafiei, T., Small, R., & McLachlan, H. (2012). Women's views and experiences of maternity care: a study of immigrant Afghan women in Melbourne, Australia. Midwifory, 28(2),198-203 206 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Shah, N., Hossain, N., Shoaib, R., Hussain, A., Gillani, R., & Khan, N. H. (2009). Socio- demographic characteristics and the three delays of maternal mortality. Journal of the College ofP hysicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 19(2), 95-98. https:lldoi.orgl02.2009/JCPSP.9598 Sharan, M., Ahmed, S., Ghebrehiwet, M .. & Rogo, K. (2011). The quality of the maternal health system in Eritrea International Journal ofG ynecology and Obstetrics, 115(3), 244-250. https:lldoi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.025 Sharma, C., Gupta, S., Tyagi, M., Mani, P., Dhingra, J., & Rana, R. (2017). Maternal & perinatal outcome in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a tertiary care hospital in northern India. MedCrave Obstet & Gynecol Int J, 6(6), 00229. Sheferaw, E. D., Mengesha, T. Z., & Wase, S. B. (2016). Development ofa tool to measure women's perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 16(1), 67. Shields, L. E., Wiesner, S., Klein, C., Pelletreau, B., & Hedriana, H. L. (2016). Use of maternal early warning trigger tool reduces maternal morbidity. American journal ofo bstetrics and gynecology, 214(4), 527 -e 1. Sibanda. T., Fox, R., Draycott, T., Mahmood, T., Richmond, D., & Simms, R. (2013). Intrapartum quality care indicators: a systemic approach for achieving consensus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bioi. • 166, 23-9. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE publications limited. Singh, A., Pallikadavath, S., Ram, P., & Alagarajan, M. (2014). Do antenatal care interventions improve neonatal survival in India? Health Policy and Planning. https:lldoi.orglI0.1093IheapoVczt066 Small, R., Roth, C., Raval, M., Shafiei, T., Korfker, D., Hearnan, M., ... & Gagnon, A. (2014). Immigrant and non-immigrant women's experiences of maternity care: a systematic and comparative review of studies in five countries. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 14(1), 152. Smith, K. V, & Sulzbach, S. (2008). Community-based health insurance and access to maternal health services: evidence from three West African countries. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 66(12), 2460-2473. https:lldoi.orgllO.1 0 16/j.socscimed.2008.0 1.044 Souza. J. P., Giilmezoglu, A. M., Vogel, J., CarroIi, G., Lumbiganon, P., Qureshi, Z., ... Say, L. (2013). Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal 207 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh mortality (the {WHO} Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): a cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 381(9879), 1747-1755. https;lldoi.org/http://dx.doi.org/l0.l016/S0140-6736(13)60686-8 Souza, J. P., Widmer, M., Gillrnezoglu, A. M., Lawrie, T. A., Adejuyigbe, E. A., Carroli, G., ... Temmerman, M. (2014). Maternal and perinatal health research priorities beyond 2015: an international survey and prioritization exercise. Reproductive Health, 11(1),61. https:lldoi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-61 Spector. J. M., Agrawal, P., et al. (2012). "Improving Quality of Care for Maternal and Newborn Health: Prospective Pilot Study of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program." PLoS One, 7(5), e35151. Srivastava, A., Avan, B. I.. Rajbangshi, P., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2015). Determinants of women's satisfaction with maternal health care: a review of literature from developing countries. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 15( 1), 97. Symon, A., McFadden, A., White, M., Fraser, K., & Cummins, A. (2018). Using the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework to evaluate women's experiences of different models of care: A qualitative study. Midwifery, 73,26-34. Talbot, L. (Ed.). (1995). Principles and practice o/nursing research. Mosby Incorporated. ten Hoope-Bender. P., de Bemis, L., Campbell, J., Downe, S., Fauveau, V., Fogstad. H., ... Van Lerberghe, W. (2014). Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. The Lancet, 384(9949), 1226-1235. https:lldoi.org/l0.l016/S0140-6736(14)60930-2 Tesfaye. S .• Barry, D., Gobezayehu, A. G., Frew, A. H., Stover, K. E., Tessema, H., ... Sibley, L. M. (2014). Improving coverage of postnatal care in rural Ethiopia using a community-based, collaborative quality improvement approach. Journal 0/ Midwifery & Women's Health, 59 Suppl 1, S55-64. https:/ldoi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12168 Thaddeus, S., & Maine, D. (1994). Too far to walk, maternal mortality in context. Social science & medicine, 38(8), 1091-1110. Thet, M. M., Khaing, E. E., Diamond-Smith, N., Sudhinaraset, M., 00, S., & Aung. T. (2016). Barriers to exclusive breastfeeding in the Ayeyarwaddy Region in Myanmar; Qualitative fmdings from mothers, grandmothers, and husbands. Appetite, 96, 62-69. Tran. T. K., Gottvall, K., Nguyen, H. D., Ascher, H., & Petzold, M. (2012). Factors associated with antenatal care adequacy in rural and urban contexts-results from 208 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh two health and demographic surveillance sites in Vietnam. BMC health services research, 12(1), 40. Tripathi, V., Stanton, C., Strobino. D., & Bartlett, L. (2015). Development and Validation of an Index to Measure the Quality of Facility-Based Labor and Delivery Care Processes in Sub-Saharan Africa. P/os One, 10(6), e0129491. https:lldoi.org/l0.13711journal.pone.0129491 Tsawe, M., & Susuman, A. (2014). Determinants of access to and use of maternal health care services in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: a quantitative and qualitative investigation. BMC Research Notes. 7(1), 723. https:lldoi.org/l0.1186/1756-0500- 7-723 Tsawe, M., Moto, A., Netshivhera, T., Ralesego, L., Nyathi, C., & Susuman, A. S. (2015). Factors influencing the use of maternal healthcare services and childhood immunization in Swaziland.lnternationaljournalJor equity in health, 14(1), 32. Tum;:alp, 0., Hindin, M. J., Adu-Bonsaffoh, K., & Adanu, R. (2012). Listening to women's voices: the quality of care of women experiencing severe maternal morbidity, in Accra, Ghana. PloS One, 7(8), e44536. https:/ldoi.org/l0.1371/joumal.pone.0044536 UNICEF, & United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). (2008). The state oJthe world's children 2009: maternal and newborn health (Vol. 9). Unicef. UNICEF. Division of Communication. (2009). Tracking progress on child and maternal nutrition: a survival and development priority. Unicef. United Nations. (2010). The Millennium Development Goals Report. Development (Vol. 17). https:lldoi.org/l0.1177/1757975909358250 Van Den Broek, N. R., & Graham, W. J. (2009). Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: The neglected agenda. BJOG: An International Journal ojO bstetrics and Gynaecology. https:/ldoi.org/1O.11111j.1471-0528.2009.02333.x Van Duong, D., Binns, C. W., Lee, A. H., & Hipgrave, D. B. (2004). Measuring client- perceived quality of maternity services in rural Vietnam. International Journal Jor Quality in Health Care, 16(6),447-452. Van Kelst, L., Spitz, 8., Sermeus, W., & Thomson, A. M. (2013). Student midwives' views on maternity care just before their graduation. Journal oja dvanced nursing, 69(3), 600-609. Villar, J., & BergSj9, P. (1997). Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. I. Philosophy, recent studies, and power to eliminate or alleviate adverse maternal 209 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh outcomes. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 76(1), 1-14. https:lldoi.orgllO.3109/00016349709047778 Vishram, B., Letley, L., Jan Van Hoek, A., Silverton, L.. Donovan, H. t Adams, c., Green, D., et al. (2018). "Vaccination in pregnancy: Attitudes of nurses, midwives and health visitors in England." Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 14( 1) 179- 188. WaIl, S. N., Lee, A. C. C., Carlo. W., Goldenberg, R., Nienneyer, S., Darmstadt, G. L., ... Lawn, J. E. (2010). Reducing Intrapartum-Related Neonatal Deaths in Low- and Middle-Income Countries-What Works? Seminars in Perinatology. https:/ldoi.org/l0.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.009 Waller, G., & Turner, H. (2016). Therapist drift redux: Why well-meaning clinicians fail to deliver evidence-based therapy, and how to get back on track. Behaviour research and therapy, 77, 129-137. Wandabwa, J. t Doyle, P., Todd, J., Ononge, S., & Kiondo, P. (2008). Risk factor for severe post partum haemorrhage in Mulago hospital, Kampala, Uganda. Eas/ African medical journal, 85(2), 64-71. Watt, S., Sword, W., & Krueger, P. (2005). Implementation of a health care policy: an analysis of barriers and facilitators to practice change. BMC health services research, 5(1),53. Weiser. T. G., Haynes, A. B., Lashoher, A., Dziekan, G., Boonnan, D. J., Berry, W. R., & Gawande, A. a. (2010). Perspectives in quality: Designing the WHO surgical safety checklist. International Journal/or Quality in Health Care, 22(5), 365-370. https:l/doi.orglI0.l093/intqhc/rnzq039 WHO Reproductive Health Library (2018). WHO recommendation on respectful maternity care. (February 2018). The WHO Reproductive Health Library; Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO, & UNICEF. (2003). Ante-natal care in developing countrie - promises, achievements and missed opportunities: an analysis o/trends, levels and differentials. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank, & The United Nations Population Division. (2014). Trends in Mternal Mortality: 1990-2013. Estimates by WHO,UNICEF, UNIFP A, The World Bank and the United Nations popUlation Division. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank, & United Nations. (2014). Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2013 Executive Summary. 210 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh WHO. (2003). What is the efficacy/effectiveness ofa ntenatal care and the financial and organizational implications. Copenhagen, Denmark. https://doi.org/Banta D (2003). What is the efficacy/effectiveness of antenatal care and the financial and organizational implications? Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence Network http://www.euro.who.int/DocumentlE82996.pdf, accessed [day month ye WHO. (2004). Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. A joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. WHO. (2005). World health report 2005: make every mother and child count. Geneva. Switzerland. https://doi.orglISBN 92 4 1562900 (NLM) WHO. (2006a). Global shortage of health workers and its impact. WHO. (2006b). Quality ofc are: a process for making strategic choices in health system. Geneva. WHO. (2006c). Working together for health: The world health report 2006. https:/ldoi.orgllO.1186/1471-2458-5-67 WHO. (2013a). Consultation on Improving measurement oft he quality ofmaterna/. newborn and child care in health facilities. Ferney Voltaire, France. WHO. (2013b).lmproving measurement oft he quality ofm aternal, newborn and child care in healthfacUities. Geneva, Switzerland. WHO. (2013c). WHO recommendations on postnatal care oft he mother and newborn. WHO. (2014). Maternal mortality. Geneva, Switzerland. WHO/UNFPNUNICEF. (1992). Traditional Birth Attendants: ajoint WHOIUNFPNUNICEF statement. WHO Offset Publ (Geneva). Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal ofB usiness & Economic Research, 5(3), 65-72. Wilson, A., Gallos, I. D., Plana, N., Lissauer, D., Khan, K. S., Zamora, J., '" Coomarasamy, A (2012). Effectiveness of strategies incorporating training and support of traditional birth attendants on perinatal and maternal mortality: Meta- analysis. BMJ (Online). https://doi.orgll0.1136Ibmj.d7102 Winch, P. J., Alam, M. A, Akther, A., Afroz, D., Ali, N. A, Ellis, A A, ... Seraji, M. H. R. (2005). Local understandings of vulnerability and protection during the neonatal period in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: A qualitative study. Lancet, 366(9484), 478- 485. https://doi.org/10.I016/S0140-6736(05)66836_5 211 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Witter. S., Adjei, S., Armar-Klemesu. M., & Graham, W. (2009). Providing free maternal health care: Ten lessons from an evaluation of the national delivery exemption policy in Ghana. Global Health Action, 2(1). https:lldoLorg/IO.3402/gha.v2iO.1881 Witter, S., Arhinful, D. K., Kusi, A., & Zakariah-Akoto, S. (2007). The Experience of Ghana in Implementing a User Fee Exemption Policy to Provide Free Delivery Care. Reproductive Health Matters, 15(30),61-71. https:l/doi.org/1O.1016/S0968- 8080(07)30325-X Woolley, F. R., Kane, R. L., Hughes, C. C., & Wright, D. D. (1978). The effects of doctor- patient communication on satisfaction and outcome of care. Social Science & Medicine. Part A: Medical Psychology & Medical Sociology, 12, 123-128. https://doi.org/l0.1016/0271-7123(78)90039-1 World Health Organization, & Unicef. (2014). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. World Health Organization, & UNICEF. (2017). Reaching the every newborn national 2020 milestones: country progress, plans and moving forward. World Health Organization. (2006). Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. World Health Organization. (20 I 0). WHO technical consultation on postpartum and postnatal care (No. WHOIMPSIl0.03). Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2013). Service availability and readiness assessment (SARA): an annual monitoring system for service delivery: reference manual (No. WHOIHISIHSIfRME/2013/1). World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2014). Consultation on improving measurement of the quality of maternal, newborn and child care in health facilities. World Health Organization. (2014). WHO recommendations on postnatal care oft he mother and newborn. World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2016). New guidelines on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Sexual and reproductive health. World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2016). Time to respond: a report on the global implementation of maternal death surveillance and response. World Health Organization. (2016). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. World Health Organization. 212 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh World Health Organization. (2016). World health statistics 2016: monitoring health/or the SDGs sustainable development goals. World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2016). World health statistics 2016: monitoring health/or the SDGs sustainable development goals. World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2017). Water and Sanitation for Health Facility Improvement Tool (WASH FIT): a practical guide for improving quality of care through water, sanitation and hygiene in health care facilities. World Health Organization. (2018). World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. World Health Organization. (2018). WHO recommendations: intrapartum care/or a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2019). Global health observatory (GHO) data: Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health (2016- 2030). Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization. WHO. Safe childbirth checklist implementation guide: improving the quality of facility-based delivery for mothers and newborns [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Jan 20]. Xu, J., Kochanek, K. D., & Murphy, S. L. (2010). National Vital Statistics Reports Deaths: Final Data/or 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports (Vol. 58). Maryland, USA. Yakubu, J., Benyas, D., & Emil, S. (2014). It's for the Greater Good: Perspectives on Maltreatment during Labor and Delivery in Rural Ghana. Open Journal 0/ ... , (May), 383-390. Yamba, F. J. (2018). Determinants o/Maternal Health Care Services Utilization in Sierra Leone between 2009 And 2013(Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghana). Yanagisawa, S., Oum, S., Wakai, S., Yakoob, M. Y., Ali, M. A. M. U., Ali, M. A. M. U., ... Iddrisu, M. (2013). Determinants of Antenatal Care, Institutional Delivery and Skilled Birth Attendant Utilization in Samre Saharti District, Tigray , Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 7(1), 1-9. https:lldoi.orgll0.1007/s1099S-013-1240-y Yaya, S., Uthman, O. A., Amouzou, A., Ekholuenetaie, M., & Bishwajit, G. (2018). Inequalities in maternal health care utilization in Benin: a population based cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 18(1), 194. 213 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh APPENDICES Appendix A: Consent Form Information Sheet for Participants Introduction Good day. My name is , and I work for Victoria Sharon Lisa Mwnuni. a PhD candidate at the school of public health, University of Ghana. She is doing a study on quality maternal health care in northern Ghana regarding what constitute quality, how it should be assessed and assessing the quality of perinatal care. I am going to give you some information and invite you to be a part of this research. You do not have to decide today whether or not you will participate in the research. Before you decide. you can talk to anyone you feel comfortable with about the research. This consent form may contain words that you do not understand. Please ask me to stop as we go through the information and I will take time to explain. If you have questions later, you can ask me or another researcher. Purpose of the research The purpose of this study is first to assess both woman and health workers views on quality of maternal health care, how it should be measured which would then infonn the development of a tool to assess quality of maternal health care. Type of Research Intervention This research will involve your participation in an interview that will take 45 to 60 minutes. Participant Selection You are being invited to take part in this research because we feel that your experience during ANC or labour or postnatal care is vital to this research Voluntary Participation Your participation in this research is entirely voluntary. It is your choice whether to participate or not. If you choose not to participate, it will have no bearing on your job or on any work-related reports. You may change your mind later and stop participating even if you agreed earlier. Your refusal to participate will not affect the care you will receive Procedures We will be asking you questions on what should constitute quality of maternal health care, how it should be assessed. We are inviting you to take part in this research project. If you accept, you will be asked to participate in an interview with [name of interviewer] or myself. During the interview, I or another interviewer will sit down with you in a private, comfortable place at the [location]. If it is better for you, the interview can take place in your home or a friend's home. If you do not wish to answer any of the questions during the interview, you may say so and the interviewer will move on to the next question. No one else but the interviewer will be present, unless you would like someone else to be there. The information recorded is confidential, and no one else except Victoria Sharon Lisa Mumuni, who is the principal investigator, Prof Augustine Ankomah, and Dr. John Kuuurnuori Ganle who are the supervisors of the candidate. Duration The research project will last for 1 year in total. This interview will be conducted once and 214 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh will last 45 to 60 minutes. We will not contact you further after this interview. Risks We are asking you to share with us some very personal and confidential information, and you may feel uncomfortable talking about some of the topics. You do not have to answer any question or take part in the discussion/interview/survey if you don't wish to do so, and that is also fme. You do not have to give us any reason for not responding to any question, or for refusing to take part in the interview Benefits There will be no direct benefit to you, but your participation will help us understand how quality maternal health should be measured and the quality of maternal health care in northern region. Reimbursements You will not be provided any incentive to take part in the research. However, we will give you GH¢5.00 for your time, and travel expenses. Confidentiality The research being done may draw attention from other people in your local community and if you participate you may be asked questions by other people in the community. We will not be sharing information about you to anyone outside of the research team. The information that we collect from this research project will be kept private. Any information about you will have a number on it instead of your name. Only the researchers will know what your number is and we will lock that information up with a lock and key. It will not be shared with or given to anyone. Sharing the Results Nothing that you tell us today will be shared with anybody outside the research team, and nothing will be attributed to you by name. The knowledge that we get from this research will be shared with you and your community before it is made widely available to the public. There will also be meetings in the community and these will be announced. Following the meetings, we will publish the results so that other interested people may learn from the research. Right to Refuse or Withdraw You do not have to take part in this research if you do not wish to do so, and choosing to participate will not affect your job or job-related evaluations in any way. You may stop participating in the interview at any time that you wish without your job being affected. I will give you an opportunity at the end of the interview to review your remarks, and you can ask to modify or remove portions of those, if you do not agree with my notes or if I did not understand you correctly. Who to Contact If you have any questions, you can ask them now or later. If you wish to ask questions later, you may contact any of the following: Victoria Lisa Mumuni on 0543391135. This proposal has been reviewed and approved by Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee, which is a committee whose task it is to make sure that research participants are protected from harm. If you wish to find about more about the IRB, contact Ms Hannah Frimpong, Research & Development Division, Ghana Health Service, P. O. Box MB 190, Accra. Tel: -0302681109,0302679323. 21S University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh You can ask me any more questions about any part of the research study, if you wish to. Do you have any questions? Certificate of Consent I have been invited to participate in a research interview about what quality of maternal health care should be and how it should be assessed. (This section is mandatory) I have read the foregoing infonnation, or it has been read to me in a language I understand. I have had the opportunity to ask questions about it and any questions I have been asked have been answered to my satisfaction. I also agree that the interview should be recorded. I consent voluntarily to be a participant in this study Print Name of Participant Signature of Participant ________ Date ____________ Day/month/year Ifilliterate I have witnessed the accurate reading of the consent form to the potential participant, and the individual has Yhad the opportunity to ask questions. I confinn that the individual has EJ'freel Print name of witness _____ Signature of witness Date Day/month/year Thumb print of participant 216 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Appendix B: Content Validity of Tool for Measuring Quality of Maternal Health Care Information Sheet for Content Validity Introduction Good day. My name is , and I work for Victoria Sharon Lisa Mumuni, a PhD candidate at the school of public health, University of Ghana. She is doing a study on quality maternal health care in northern Ghana regarding what constitute quality, how it should be assessed and assessing the quality of perinatal care. I am going to give you some information and invite you to be a part of this research. You do not have to decide today whether or not you will participate in the research. Before you decide, you can talk to anyone you feel comfortable with about the research. A qualitative study was conducted with women and analysed to produce the quality of care measuring tool below. You are being invited as an expert in this area to validate the instrument. Please ask me to stop as we go through the information and I will take time to explain. If you have questions later, you can ask me or another researcher. Purpose of the research The purpose of this study is first to assess both woman and health workers views on quality of maternal health care, how it should be measured which would then inform the development of a tool to assess quality of maternal health care. You are please reminded as an expert in maternal health care delivery to critically evaluate the content of the proposed tool for measuring quality of maternal healthcare in Ghana. Type of Research Intervention This research will involve your participation in an interview that will take 15 to 20 minutes. Participant Selection You are being invited to take part in this research because of your experience in maternal health care service Voluntary Participation Your participation in this research is entirely voluntary. It is your choice whether to participate or not. If you choose not to participate, it will have no bearing on your job or on any work- rela~ed reports. You may change your mind later and stop participating even if you agreed earher. Procedures We will give you a set of questions that was developed from a qualitative study conducted among ANC, labour and p.ostnatal ~omen in Selected health facilities in Northern region of Ghan~ on w~t should be ~cluded 10 tool for measuring the quality of maternal health care. The 1Oformatlon recorded IS confidential, and no one else except Victoria Sharon Lisa 217 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Mumuni, who is the principal investigator, Prof Augustine Ankomah, Dr Amos Laar and Dr John Kuuumuori Ganle who are the supervisors of the candidate. Duration The research project will last for 1 year in total. This interview will be conducted once and will last 15 to 20 minutes. We will not contact you further after this interview. Risks We are asking you to share with us some very personal and confidential information, and you may feel uncomfortable talking about some of the topics. You do not have to answer any question or take part in the discussion/interview/survey if you don't wish to do so, and that is also fine. You do not have to give us any reason for not responding to any question, or for refusing to take part in the interview Benefits There will be no direct benefit to you, but your participation will help us understand how quality maternal health should be measured in Ghana and more specifically, the quality of maternal health care in northern region. Reimbursements You will not be provided any incentive to take part in the research. Confidentiality We will not be sharing information about you to anyone outside of the research team. The information that we collect from this research project will be kept private. Any information about you will have a number on it instead of your name. Only the researchers will know what your number is and we will lock that information up with a lock and key. It will not be shared with or given to anyone. Sharing the Results Nothing that you tell us today will be shared with anybody outside the research team, and nothing will be attributed to you by name. Right to Refuse or Withdraw You do not have to take part in this research if you do not wish to do so, and choosing to participate will not affect your job or job-related evaluations in any way. You may stop participating in the interview at any time that you wish without your job being affected. I will give you an opportunity at the end of the interview to review your remarks, and you can ask to modify or remove portions of those, if you do not agree with my notes or if I did not understand you correctly. 218 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Who to Contact If you have any questions, you can ask them now or later. If you wish to ask questions later, you may contact any of the following: Victoria Lisa Mumuni on 0201403848. This proposal has been reviewed and approved by Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee, which is a committee whose task it is to make sure that research participants are protected from harm. If you wish to find about more about the IRB, contact Ms Hannah Frimpong, Research & Development Division, Ghana Health Service, P. O. Box MB 190, Accra. Tel: -0302681109, 0302679323. You can ask me any more questions about any part of the research study, if you wish to. Do you have any questions? Certificate of Consent I have been invited to participate in a research interview about what quality of maternal health care should be and how it should be assessed. (This section is mandatory) I have read the foregoing information and understand its content. I have had the opportunity to ask questions about it and any questions I have been asked questions and answered to my satisfaction. I also agree that the interview should be recorded. I consent voluntarily to be a participant in this study Print Name ofParticipant,_ _______ Signature of Participant _________ Date ___________ Day/month/year 219 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Appendix C: Interview Guide for Midwives and Doctors A. Perceived decision-making process and expectations for women to attend ANCldeliver at a facility/attend postnatalDPlease take a moment to think about your work on the ANCllabor and delivery ward/postnatal and your patients. I. In your opinion, why do women seek care at facilities for [ANC, Labour, Postnatal]? 2. In your opinion, how is the decision made for women to seek care at facilities [ANC, o Labour, Postnatal]? 3. In your opinion, what do patients expect when they seek care at the facility for [ANC, o Labour, Postnatal]? Explore factors such as. a. Structural factors: Infrastructure, interpersonal relation, health workforce b. Process factors: safety, effective, patient centred ness, timeliness of service c. Outcome factors: comfort, satisfaction 4. What do you think patients NEED when they seek care at the facility for [ANC, Labour, Postnatal]? Please explain. a. Structural factors: Infrastructure, interpersonal relation, health workforce b. Process factors: safety, effective, patient centreciness, timeliness of service c. Outcome factors: comfort, satisfaction B. Dimension and Tenets Quality Maternal Care Now I would like to ask your opinion on the dimension that should be included when measuring quality of maternal care during labor and delivery. 5. What is quality of maternal health care? 6. How should quality of maternal health care be measured? Probe on dimensions a. Providers Perspective b. Clients perspective 7. What items should be considered when designing a measurement tool to assess quality of Dmaternal health? a. Structural factors: Infrastructure, interpersonal relation, health workforce b. Process factors: safety, effective, patient centredness, timeliness of service c. Outcome factors: comfort, satisfaction 8. Which of these dimensions do you consider very important? Please explain. 9. In your opinion, what could be done to improve the quality of maternal health for women Dduring ANC, labor and delivery, postnatal? C. Perceived factors that influence quality of maternal health care in the facilities 10. In your opinion, what are the factors that influence quality of maternal health care? Probe: a Related to supplies (availability of medication, equipment) b. Related to health provider staffmg (number of staff, attitude towards patients) c. Related to patient load (number of patients, overcrowding) d. Related to your health facility (policies, infrastructure, services) II. In your opinion, what could be done to improve maternal health care? 72 220 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Appendix D: Focus Discussion Guide for Women A. Perceived decision-making process and expectations for women to attend ANC/deliver at a facility/attend postnatalOPlease take a moment to think about your work on the ANCllabor and delivery ward/postnatal and your patients. 1.10 your opinion, why do women seek care at facilities for [ANC, Labour, Postnatal]? 2. 10 your opinion, how is the decision made for women to seek care at facilities [ANC, OLabour, Postnatal]? 3. In your opinion, what do patients expect when they seek care at the facility for [ANC, J Labour, Postnatal]? Explore are such. a. Structural factors: Infrastructure, interpersonal relation, health workforce b. Process factors: safety, effective, patient centredness, timeliness of service c. Outcome factors: comfort, satisfaction 4. What do you think. patients NEED when they seek care at the facility for [ANC, Labour, Postnatal]? Please explain. a. Structural factors: Infrastructure, interpersonal relation, health workforce b. Process factors: safety, effective, patient centredness, timeliness of service c. Outcome factors: comfort, satisfaction B. Dimension and Tenets Quality Maternal Care Now I would like to ask your opinion on the dimension should be included when measuring quality of maternal care during labor and delivery. S. What is quality of maternal health care? 6. How should quality of maternal health care be measured? Probe on dimensions a. Providers Perspective b. Clients perspective 7. What items should be considered when designs a measurement tool to assess quality of Omaternal health? a. Structural factors: Infrastructure, interpersonal relation, health workforce b. Process factors: safety, effective, patient centredness, timeliness of service c. Outcome factors: comfort, satisfaction 8. Which of these dimensions do you consider very important? Please explain. 9.10 your opinion, what could be done to improve the quality of maternal health for women Oduring ANC, labor and delivery, postnatal? C. Perceived factors that influence quality of maternal health care in the facilities 10. In your opinion, what are the factors that influence quality of maternal health care? Probe: a. Related to supplies (availability of medication, equipment) b. Related to health provider staffing (number of staff, attitude towards patients) c. Related to patient load (number of patients, overcrowding) d. Related to your health facility (policies, infrastructure, services) II. 10 your opinion, what could be done to improve maternal health care? 221 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Appendix E: Tool for experts in maternal heaIthcare provision Socio-demographic Data of experts Age ................................................. .. Sex .................................................. .. Profession ........................................... .. Place of Work ....................................... . Number of year working in place ................. . Please indicate the degree to which you agree that the following items should be included in a tool for measuring quality of matem al health Care No Health facility Strongly disagree Undecided Agree Strongly disagree Ae:ree 1 A vailability of health facility 2 Proximity of health facility to clients 3 Health facility being spacious to accommodate I all clients i 4 A vailability of adequate ! seats 5 A vailability of adequate bed Amenities 6 Availability of adequate number of urinals for I clients I 7 Availability of adequate number of toilets for clients I 8 Toilet is clean and neat 9 -- - .. Urinal is clean and neat - Environment - 10 Theenvrronmentwithin --f---- ---- the health facility is clean 11 The envrronment is airy -.---- and fresh Privacy 12 There is privacy in the consulting room 13 There is privacy in the examination room of the facility 14 Health providers respect 222 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ~---- -, the privacy of patients 1 -----I ---"----,-~ Interpersonal relationship - ---"1 15 Health care worker explained procedure well to patients " ~-"- 16 Health care provider treats patients with respect .--------..-------"-- ~ ~ 17 Health care provider requested for consent before clinical procedure ----1---- "- 18 Health provider answers patients questions satisfactorily - 19 Health provider involves patient or partner in decision-making -~ - --- Human resource ""-- 20 Midwives on duty are adequate and attend to different clients at the •• same time ~_I _____- f-- -- 21 Adequate doctors on duty 1--- ~ t-~-- - ----- 22 Availability of health assistants to attend to clients 23 Availability of medical records staff to facilitate fast retrieval of medical records 24 Health care provided to patients in a timely ! manner without delay 25 Ability of service providers to provide all services 26 Health providers being polite to clients i L Saf~j" 27 Measures put in place to --T ensure patients safety 28 The environment in the health facility should be safe Rani e of Services 29 Availability of all services clients required 30 Availability of expert for services in the health ; facility i~ll All service delivery POints 223 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh -- -- located within the health facility ------_._- ---- ---1 Health Insurance -----,-- --, ~.------- .~--- --- 32 Facility accepting national health insurance . 33 Non-discrimination between insured and non- insured clients - 34 Insurance covering all services provided to client ---··----~--I Logistics and supplies -~---------.------ 35 Availability of prescribed medications in the health I I facility I 36 A vailabiJity of diagnostic I test (Laboratory, I ultrasound) in the health facility - _._-- 37 Measures taken to relieve pain to patient during labour I ~ -. ---~-- ..~ - ... ~-.- ~- - --1----- 38 Measures to reduce pain during labour is effective ~~ 1---- ~~-.~--~- -----~-- 39 Infonning patient on nature of pain Satisfaction/wellbeing 40 Client satisfied about treatment outcome for self -- 41 Client satisfied with treatment outcome for baby I 42 General satisfaction about treatment received at I health facility -~-~-- 43 Satisfaction about health care providers attitude 44 Satisfaction about -l education received on condition I -- ----._----- 45 ----Satisfaction about --~~-·-~I interpersonal communication between I health care provider and clients 46 Satisfaction about review infonnation received from health care providers Outcome 47 Maternal health outcome satisfactory 224 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh '1 ··outcomeol"Woy . ··N<>in;ury to baby and : roodlet so Live birth achieved 51 Overall rating health facility 52. In your opinion, do you think there is/are other important indicator(s) to measure quality of maternal care that probably was not included in this developed tool? D No D Yes 53. If your response to question 52 is a "Yes", please indicate clearly which indicator(s) you think could be added to the tool to measure quality of maternal healthcare. a. ............................................................................................................. b . ............................................................................................................. c. ................ ............................................................................................ d . .............................................................................................................. e . .............................................................................................................. f. ............................................................................................................. g. ........................................................................................................ . Slightly Moderately Very satisfied with satisfied satisfied the content of the developed tool 225 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Appendix F: Survey questionnaire for women 226 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Appendix G: Quality of Maternal HealthCare (Final Tool) SD D N A SA Domains and items Health Facility Domain 1. Proximity of health facility to clients (less than 5km) 2. Health facility is spacious to accommodate all clients 3. Health facility has seats Amenities Domain 4. Health facility has adequate urinals for clients 5. Toilet is clean and neat 6. Urinal is clean and neat Environment Domain 7. The environment in health facility is clean 8. The environment is ail)' and fresh Privacy Domain 9. There is privacy in the consulting room 10. There is privacy in the examination room 11. Healthcare providers respect clients' privacy Inter-personal relationship domain 12. Healthcare worker provided adequate information and education on your pregnancy 13. Healthcare worker explained procedures to you 14. Healthcare provider treated you with respect 15. Healthcare provider requested your consent before clinical procedures 16. Health provider answered your questions satisfactorily 17. Health provider involved you or partner in your care decision- making 18. You have home visitation after the delivery at the health facility 19. You felt discriminated against at any point in time in the health facility because you do not come from a rich background 20. Women who are richer are treated much faster and better in the health facility than poor women 21. Healthcare providers are polite to clients SO= Strongly disagree, D=Oisagree, N= Neutral, A = Agree, SA = Strongly agree 227 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh SO 0 N A SA Domains and items Human resource domain 22. Midwives on duty were adequate and attending to different clients at the same time 23. Doctors on duty were enough 24. Healthcare providers are readily available to assist clients 25. Medical records staff are readily available to facilitate fast retrieval of medical records 26. Healthcare provided to you in a timely manner without delay (within 1 hour) 27. Service providers can provide needed services to you Safety domain 28. Adequate measures put in place to ensure patients' safety 29. I feel the environment in the health facility is safe (e.g. free from dangerous animals and hazards) Range of services domain 30. Health facility has all services I needed 31. Health facility has adequate specialists/experts to provide services I need in the health facility 32. Health facility has an effective referral system in place Health insurance domain 33. Health facility accepts health insurance 34. There is discrimination between insured and non-insured clients at health facility SD= Strongly disagree, O-Disagree, N- Neutral, A - Agree, SA = Strongly agree 228 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh SD DNA SA Domains and items Logistics and supplies domain 35. You pay for the medications that you get at the health facility 36. You buy your medication outside the health facility 37. You have to walk for long distance in order to get the medicines that are available at the health facility Pain management domain 38. Measures to reduce pain during labour are effective Clients' satisfaction domain 39. You are satisfied about treatment outcome for yourself 40. You are satisfied with treatment outcome for your baby 41. You are generally satisfied with treatment received at health facility 42. You are satisfied with healthcare providers' attitude 43. You are satisfied with education received on condition 44. You are satisfaction with inter-personal communication between healthcare provider and clients 45. You are satisfied with review information received from healthcare providers Outcomes domain 46. No injury to mother 47. Live birth achieved SD= Strongly disagree, D=Disagree, N= Neutral, A = Agree. SA = Strongly agree 229 University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Appendix H: Ghana Health Service Ethical Clearance Form O. ..... H.;.id;S.;.;~ P. O. Bo. MB 190 Accra r.l. • ]))-J01-68I1{)9 Fa + lJJ..J0J-68$4U £_I:~"II' 3 hours walk i What is usually the mode of transportation to the aa By walking J 'lealth facility a By bicycle a By motorcycle a By Tricycle (motor) By car I What Is the time spent at the health facility before aa < 30 mins , seen by a doctor/midwife a 30 mins - 1 hour a 1· 2 hours 2 - 3 hours a> 3 hours I15 the sanitation at the health facility hygienic a one (where one(l) is low and five(5) Is high o two j oo three four o five Availability of health facility o yes oO no don't know www.projectredcap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh fitientJal Quality of Matem,1 Health Care In Northern Region of Ghana page 6 of 22 Section ld Quality Of Maternal Health Care Are there measures to reduce pain during labour o yes Ono o don't know Food was provided by the facility when I was on o yes admission Ono If any Item on this page does not apply to you then leave the Item blank. In the following section, evaluate the number of times you carried out maternal health care; (l) being low to (S)"belng high. . eM!" r .,,@'tl1 C strongly disagree disagree neura agree strongly agree Proximity of health facility to 0 0 0 0 0 clients (less than Skm) Health facility being spacious to 0 0 0 o 0 accommodate all clients Availability of adequate seats 0 0 0 o 0 agree strongly agree Availability of adequate urinals 0 0 0 o 0 for clients Availability of toilets facilities 0 0 0 o 0 separated for males and females Toilet is clean and neat 0 0 0 o 0 Urinal is clean and neat 0 0 0 o 0 ..,~ ~ or. environment .': ~ ~~,"jR_ strongly disagree disagree neural The environment in health o 0 o facility is clean The environment is airy and o o o o o fresh strongly disagree disagree neural agree strongly agree There is privacy in the consulting 0 o o room o o There is privacy in the o o o o examination room of the facility o Health providers respect the o o o pnvacy of patients o o University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh I'age 70(11 Health care worker provided 0 0 0 adequate information and education on my pregnancy 0 Health care worker explained 0 0 0 0 procedure to you Health care provider treated you 0 0 0 0 0 with respect Health care provider requested 0 0 0 0 0 for consent before clinical procedure Health provider answered your 0 0 0 0 0 questions satisfactorily Health provider involved you or 0 0 0 0 0 partner In decision-making You have home visitation after 0 0 0 0 0 the delivery at the health facility You feel discriminated at any 0 0 0 0 0 point in time In the health facility because you do not come from a rich background Women who are richer than you 0 0 0 0 0 are treated much faster and better In the health facility than poor women agree Midwives on duty are adequate 0 0 0 0 and attending to different clients at the same time More doctors on duty 0 0 0 0 0 Availability of people or health 0 0 0 0 0 assistants to assist clients Availability of medical records 0 0 0 0 0 staff to facilitate fast retrieval of medical records Health care provided to you in a 0 0 0 0 timely manner without delay 0 (within 1 hour) Ability of service providers to 0 0 provide needed services 0 0 0 www.projectredcap.org .-E University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ,..80'22 Health providers are polite to o o o o o dients strongly disagree disagree neura,Il··algree--stfOllln£I!J!I Measure put in place to ensure o o 000 patient safety I feel the environment in the o o o o o health facility is safe (e.g free from dangerous animals and hazards) Availability of needed service 0 0 0 0 0 clients required Availability of expert for services 0 0 0 0 0 in the health facility Health facility have effective 0 0 0 0 0 referral systems in place All service delivery points 0 0 0 0 0 located within the health facility Health Insurance ::1?t:i'§iR~F·W' iH strongly disagree ( disagree neural Facility accepting national health o 0 o Insurance Non-discrimination between o o o o insured and non-insured Clients o Insurance covering all services o o o provided to client o o www·proJectredcap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Page90f22 Istles and supplies strongly disagree disagree neural agree strongly agree 0 Availability of prescribed 0 0 0 0 medications in the health facility Availability of diagnostic test 0 0 0 0 0 (Laboratory, ultrasound) in the health facility You get all your medication 0 0 0 0 0 ~ithin the health facility You pay for the medications that 0 0 0 0 0 you get at the health facility You buy your medication outside 0 0 0 0 0 tl1e healthy facility You have to walk for long 0 0 0 0 0 distance in order to get the medicines that are available at the health facility Health facility uses manual 0 0 0 0 0 retrieval of records Health facility uses 0 0 0 0 0 computerized systems for retrieval of records following section, much that you agree with the statements ) being low and ( agree Measures to reduce pain during 0 0 0 labour are effective klforming patient on nature of 0 0 0 0 0 pain Food provided by the facility 0 0 0 0 0 was good www.projectredClp.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh iiim:3i Page 100(22 Client satisfied about treatment 0 0 0 outcome for self C~ent satisfied with treatment 0 0 0 0 0 outcome for baby General satisfaction about 0 0 0 0 0 treatment received at health facility Satisfaction about health care 0 0 0 0 0 providers attitude Satisfaction about education 0 0 0 0 0 received on condition Satisfaction about interpersonal 0 0 0 0 0 communication between health care provider and clients Satisfaction about review 0 0 0 0 0 information received from health care providers Outcome ""' ..... .:~~ '.~ strongly disagree disagree neura agree strongly agree Maternal health outcome 0 0 0 0 0 satisfactory Health outcome of baby 0 0 0 0 0 satisfactory No injury to mother 0 0 0 0 0 Live birth achieved 0 0 0 0 0 Overall rating of health facility 0 0 0 0 0 ReSults of the Interview o COMPLETE INTERVIEW o INCOMPLETE REFUSED o INCOMPLETE TO BE COMPLETED LATER www.proJectredcap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Quality of Niltema/ Health Care In Northem Region of Ghanll Pagell of22 SECTION 2A: IDENTIFICATION - For Health Staff Only Name of District o tamale metro oo sagnarigu o savelugu kumbungu Name of community where health facility is located What type of health facility is this? oOC HPS o Health Centre Polyclinic o Hospital Date of facility assessment For the purpose of this study, the availability or presence of infrastructure, equipment and drugs must be observed (or seen) by the study team. If an element Is not observed by the team, It should be counted as not available. Exceptions to this rule, should be noted as ents under specific questions (In this case, It Is specified to whom the question should ked). Conti e study? How many minutes does it take to travel by vehicle to the nearest higher facility? (If there is no higher level facility. answer zero) (enquire from facility staff) Is telephone services available in this facility? (a o yes functional land line or mobile phone) Ono Is there a functional and accessible emergency o yes transportation in this facility? (Consider Ono Observation. If not ask facility staff) What is the available mode of transport? Does the facility have constant water supply? o yes Ono What is the main type of water supply oo Piped o Well/Bore Hole o Rain collection River o Tanker Do cli~nts have access to a working toilet facility? '~ulre from facility staff) o yes Ono ~ ~he facility have separate washrooms or toilet IIcHities for clients and staff workers?(enquire o yes hm facility staff) Ono www.projectredcap.org frE University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh page 12 of 21 I I ~s the facility have separate toilet for men and o yes women? Ono Which major source of power Is available at this oo National Grid facility? Generators o Solar www.projectredcap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh QUlll/ty of /ififtemlll Heilith Care in Northern Region of Ghllnll Page 13 of 22 Section 28 - Staffing I for the purpose of this study, the team must 0 e ture, equipment and drugs are available. If an element is not seen by the team, It should be counted as not ~lable. '* • ' What Is the number of full time Doctors working in the facility? (enquire from facility staff) What is the number of Part Time Doctors working at the facility? (enquire from facility staff) What is the number of full time Physician Assistants currently working in the facility? (enquire from facility staff) What is the number of part time Physician Assistants currently working in the faCility? (enquire from facility staff) State clearly the number of midwives currently working in this facility? (enquire from facility staff) State clearly the number of professional nurses currently work.ing at this facility? (enquire from facility staff) State number of (health care assistance clinical) nurses currently working at this facility? (enquire from facility staff) State number of (health care assistance clinical) enrolle~ nursing assistants currently working at I thiS faCility? (enquire from facility staff) What is the number of community health nurses cu~~ntly employed at this facility? (enquire from faCIlity staff) What is the number of laboratory technicians currently working at this facility? (enquire from faclHty staff) Did. ~he district health administration visit this o yes faCIlity to supervise activities in the last three Ono completed months? (enquire from facility staff) State number of times visits were made? (enquire from facility staff) WWW.proJectredcap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh QuaRry of Matern.' Health Care In Northern Region of G""". PlHJe 14 of22 section 2C - ANC/PNC 0;, weekly basis, how many days do pregnant women have access to antenatal services at this facility? (enquire from facility staff) On weekly basis, how many days do clients have access to postnatal services at this facility? (enquire from facility staff) Do ANC/PNC clients have access to waiting seats? oo None o Yes but not enough Yes enough Does the facility have test kits for checking Malaria o yes in pregnant women? Ono Does the facility have test kits for checking o yes Hepatitis B in pregnant women? Ono www.projectreclcap.org ftEDCap University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Quality of Maternal Health Care In Northern Region of Ghana Page15of11 Section 20 - General OPO Service ;es the facility have General OPD services? (enquire o yes from facility staff) Ono On weekly basis, how many days do pregnant women have access to malaria services at this facility? lenquire from facility staff) Do clients have access to waiting seats? oo None Yes but not enough o Yes enough I Does the facility have a private and obscured place o yes used for examination of pregnant women? (enquire Ono from facility staff) o dont't know Does the facility have a private and obscured place, o yes where other clients cannot hear or see while Ono I examination Is ongoing? (enquire from facility staff) o don't know Which of these equipment is available in the facility o Clinical thermometer today? oo Rapid Diagnostic Test Kit (several) Disposable syringes and needles oo Stethoscope Disposable gloves o Canulas (Multiple responses allowed) Which of these delivery equipment Is available in o Paediatric ventilation bag and masks I this facility today? o Adult ventilation bag and masks o Filled Oxygen cylinders with Flow Metres o Blood Fridges o Blood transfusion sets (Multiple responses allowed) Which of these newborn equipment is available in the o Bag and mask for newborn resuscitation facility today? o Suction Equipment (mucuous extractor and suctiol machine) o Adult weighing scale o Paediatric weighing scale (Multiple responses allowed) Do Newly born babies get timely check up and o yes assessment at the facility? Ono Do Clients get distribution of mosquito nets from the o yes facility? Ono www.pn!jectredcap.org ffEDCaD University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Quality o( Maternal Health CMe In Notthem Region of Gh8na ".160'22 section 2E· Laboratory ooes the facility have a functioning laboratory? o yes Ono What about the presence of laboratory technician at o yes the facility? Ono Which lab tests or scans do clients receive in the o ROn - Wet mount facility? (enquire lab technician) oOHB o Random Blood Sugar o Full blood Count o Blood Grouping and Matching Urine analysis o Renal/Kidney Function test OX-ray (Multiple responses allowed) 15 blood in stock in this facility today? o yes Ono www.proJectreck:ap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh QUllllty of NatemlJl Health Care In Northern Region of Ghana Page J7 of 22 Section 2F - Pharmacy/essential drugs Do you have drugs in this facility? o yes Ono ;e there drugs in this facility purposely to augment o yes labor? Ono Mention types of drugs you have to augment labor? Does this facility accept National Health Insurance? o yes Ono Does the insurance cover all the drugs you have o yes mentioned? Ono What about the presence of anti-malarial drugs for o yes pregnant women? Ono Does the facility use computerised record keeping o yes JtStems7(enquire from facility staff) Ono Does the facility have ambulance services?(enquire o yes from facility staff) Ono What type of emergency transportation services are available? Does the Health facility have effective and trusted o yes patient complaint and resolution mechanism in place? Ono (enquire from facility staff) Is the facility safe or protected from the following? o Rodents (TIck where appropriate) o Reptiles o Floods o Exposed Electrical Wires Review monthly records of how many pregnant women o yes were seen by trained professionals Ono How many patients (pregnant women) visit this facility a month How many deliveries have you had for the past one month ~s the health facility provide catering services to clients on admission? o yes Ono www.projectredcap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Quality 01 Uatemal Health Care In Notthem Region of Ghana ,..180111 Section 2G: Quality of Maternal Health Care-Facility Are there measures to reduce pain when clients are in o yes labOur? oOn o don't know Does this facility provide food for clients in o yes admission? Ono o don't know If any item on this page does not apply to you then leave the item blank. In the following section, evaluate the number of times you carried out maternal health care; (1) being low to !} being high. .lib _. $ strongly disagree disagree neural agree strongly agree Proximity of health facility to 000 0 o clients (less than 5km) Health facility being spacious to o o o o o accommodate all clients Availability of adequate seats o o o o o strongly disagree disagree neural agree strongly agree Availability of adequate urinals 0 o 0 0 0 for clients Availability of toilets facilities 0 o 0 0 0 separated for males and females Toilet is clean and neat 0 o 0 0 0 Urinal is clean and neat 0 o 0 0 0 The environment in health o 0 facility is clean The environment is airy and o o 0 fresh 0 0 strongly disagree disagree neural agree strongly agree There is privacy in the consulting 0 room o o o o There is privacy in the o o examination room of the facility o o o H~alth providers respect the o o privacy of patients o o o University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Page 19 of 22 Iiealth care provider provide 0 0 adequate information and education on pregnancies 0 Health care workers explain 0 0 0 0 procedures to be taken to clients Health care workers provide 0 0 0 0 0 treatment to clients with respect Health care provider request for 0 0 0 0 0 consent before clinical rea1~~';Jr~~ider answer clients 0 0 0 0 0 questions satisfactorily Health provider involve clients or 0 0 0 0 0 their partner in decision-making Health provider do home 0 0 0 0 0 visitation after the delivery at the health facility Health care provider 0 0 0 0 0 discriminate against clients at any point in time in the health facility because of a client's financial background Women who are richer than their o o o o o counterparts are treated much faster and better in the health facility than poor women strongly dIsagree disagree neural agree strongly agree Midwives on duty are adequate o o o o o and attending to different clients at the same time They are more doctors on duty o o o o o Availability of people or health o o o o o asSistants to assist clients Availability of medical records o o o o o staff to facilitate fast retrieval of medical records Health care services are o o o provided in a timely manner o o WIthout delay (within 1 hour) in this facility www.projectredcap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Pl/fIIlOofZZ 0 0 Ability of service providers to 0 0 0 provide needed services 0 0 0 0 0 Health providers are polite to dients ~afety :J. strongly disagree disagree neural agree strongly agree Measure put in place to ensure o o o o o patient safety I feel the environment in the o o o o o health facility is safe (e.g free from dangerous animals and hazards) Range of Services strongly disagree disagree neural agree strongly agree Availability of needed service o o o o - 0 dients required Availability of expert for services o o o o o in the health facility Health facility have effective o o o o o referral systems in place All service delivery points o o o o o located within the health facility Health Insurance strongly disagree disagree neural agree strongly agree Facility accepting national health o o o o 0 insurance Non-discrimination between o o o o o insured and non-insured clients Insurance covering all services o o o o o provided to client www.pro)ectredcap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Page 2l 0122 Lc!glstlcs and supplies strongly disagree disagree Availability of prescribed 0 0 medications in the health facility Availability of diagnostic test 0 0 0 0 0 (Laboratory, ultrasound) in the health facility All medications are within the 0 0 0 0 0 health facility Clients pay for the medications 0 0 0 0 0 they get at the health facility Clients buy medication outside 0 0 0 0 0 the healthy facility Clients walk for long distance in 0 0 0 0 0 order to get the medicines that are available at the health facility Health facility uses manual 0 0 0 0 0 retrieval of records Health facility uses 0 0 0 0 0 computerized systems for retrieval of records in the following section, evaluate how much that you agree with the state.. men. t. s presented "=" with (1) being low and (5) being high. ___ _ ":fMW\-. _.< strongly disagree disagree neural agree strongly agree Measures to reduce pain during 0 0 0 0 0 labour are effective Inform patients on nature of pain 0 0 0 0 0 Health facility provide food for 0 0 0 0 0 admitted clients all the time Food provided by this facility is 0 0 0 0 0 good www.prolectredcap.org University of Ghana, http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ,age220'22 Clients are general satisfied with 0 0 0 treatment outcome for them Clients are satisfied with 0 0 0 0 0 treatment outcomes for babies There is general satisfaction 0 0 0 0 0 about treatment received at health facility Clients are satisfaction with 0 0 0 0 0 health care providers attitude Clients are satisfied with 0 0 0 0 0 education received on their condition Clients are satisfaction about 0 0 0 0 0 interpersonal communication between health care provider and clients Clients are satisfaction about 0 0 0 0 0 review information received from health care providers Outcome A,.::,/2I strongly disagree disagree Over all this health facility o o o performs very well Results of the interview oo COMPLETE INTERVIEW o INCOMPLETE REFUSED INCOMPLETE TO BE COMPLETED LATER www·proJectredcap.org