INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT N SOURCES ON THE GROWTH, LEAF YIELD AND QUALITY OF MULBERRY (Morus alba) BY AMPPIAH ARNOLD SYLVESTER THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF MPHIL CROP SCIENCE (AGRONOMY) DEGREE CROP SCIENCE DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY OF GHANA LEGON JUNE 2013. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh i DECLARATION 1 hereby declare that, except for references to other researchers work which have been duly cited, this work is the result of my own original research and that this Thesis has neither in whole nor in parts been presented for any degree elsewhere. ……………………………………… AMPPIAH ARNOLD SYLVESTER (STUDENT) DATE ……………………………… …………………………………. PROF. JOHN OFOSU-ANIM (SUPERVISOR) DATE …………………….…… …………………………………….. PROF. DANIEL OBENG-OFORI (CO-SUPERVISOR) DATE…………………………….. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ii ABSTRACT The influence of inorganic N sources on growth, leaf yield and quality of mulberry (Morus alba) was studied under field conditions before (Experiment 1) and after (experiment 2) pruning. The treatments consisted of three mulberry varieties (Kanva-2, S-36 and Mysore local) and three N sources (urea, Sulphate of Ammonia and NPK) and a control. The experimental design used was a split plot design. Varieties formed the main plot and N sources the sub-plot factors. The N sources had significant influence on growth, leaf yield and quality of mulberry. Plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches, leaf yield (leaf fresh weight) and leaf quality (moisture and crude protein) were significantly increased by SoA in experiment 1. However, NPK significantly increased plant height, number of leaves per plant, stem diameter, leaf yield (leaf fresh weight) and leaf quality (leaf moisture, leaf crude protein, mineral content and leaf N) after pruning (experiment 2). Among the varieties, S-36 was superior with regards to leaf protein and leaf moisture in both experiments. Mysore local on the other hand was superior in terms of leaf mineral content and protein. The status of sericulture was determined by conducting a survey using questionnaire and group discussions. It was revealed that 5.9% of sericulture farmers had no formal education. Brong-Ahafo Region had the highest (88.2%) number of sericulture farmers. The low patronage and low cocoon production was due to lack of market, price discrimination, lack of market and lack of knowledge on the existence of cocoon market outside Ghana. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh iii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to God Almighty and my Dad, Mr. Amppiah Michael Edmund. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I thank God Almighty for his grace and guidance throughout this study. I express my profound gratitude to Office of Research, Innovation and Development (ORID), University of Ghana for funding this study. I am also grateful to my supervisors Prof. John Ofosu-Anim and Prof. Daniel Obeng-Ofori for their suggestions and various contributions. I am grateful to Mr. Paul K. Ntaanu, Nana Kwadwo Gyau Kyeremeh, Mr. Owusu Kwarteng and all sericulture groups for their immense contributions and support during the survey. My appreciation also goes to the staff of the silk factory for their contributions. I sincerely appreciate the heads and the technical staffs of Ecological Laboratory, Soil Science Department, University of Ghana Farm, Legon and Crop Science Department, University of Ghana for space, laboratory analyses and support. I am grateful to all who helped in many ways to make this work a success. Glory to God Almighty. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh v TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE DECLARATION i ABSTRACT ii DEDICATION iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv TABLE OF CONTENTS v LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF FIGURES xi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiii CHAPTER ONE 1 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Problem statement 4 1.2 Objectives of the Study 5 CHAPTER TWO 6 LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.0 The sericulture industry 6 2.1 Importance of sericulture 6 2.2 Global silk production 8 2.2.1 Global Imports and Exports of Silk and Silk Products 9 2.3 Raw Silk Cocoon Production in Ghana 11 2.4 Description of mulberry plant 13 2.4.1 Description of some Mulberry Varieties 14 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh vi 2.4.2 Economic importance of mulberry 15 2.5 Cultivation of mulberry 16 Planting materials and planting 16 Pests and diseases 17 Harvesting and postharvest handling 20 2.6 Influence of inorganic nitrogen on plant growth, leaf yield and leaf quality 21 2.7 Influence of inorganic nitrogen on growth and leaf yield of mulberry 22 2.7.1 Influence of inorganic nitrogen on leaf quality of mulberry 26 CHAPTER THREE 28 MATERIALS AND METHODS 28 3.1 The Survey 28 3.2 Field Experiments 31 3.2.1Experiment 1: Influence of nitrogen on the growth and leaf quality of three mulberry varieties 32 3.3 Soil Sampling and Analysis 32 3.3.1 Soil pH 33 3.3.2 Determination of soil total nitrogen 33 3.3.4 Soil Phosphorus (P) 34 3.4 Determination of Exchangeable Bases in Soil 34 3.4.1 Soil available Potassium (K) 35 3.4.2 Soil available Calcium (Ca) 35 3.4.3 Soil available Magnesium (Mg) 35 3.4.4 Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) 36 3.4.5 Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) 37 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh vii 3.5 Soil Physical Properties 37 3.5.1 Particle size analysis 37 3.5.2 Experimental materials 38 3.5.3 Experimental treatments and field layout 39 3.6 Cultivation Practices 40 3.6.1 Fertilizer application 40 3.7 Data Collection 40 3.7.1 Dry matter yield 41 3.8 Experiment 2: Regeneration of Mulberry Plants 42 3.9 Plant Analysis 42 3.9.1 Moisture content (%) 43 3.9.2 Digestion of plant sample 43 3.9.3 Total Nitrogen 43 3.9.4 Plant total Phosphorus (P) 44 3.9.5 Plant Potassium (K) 44 3.9.6 Calcium and Magnesium 44 3.9.7 Leaf crude protein 45 3.10 Statistical Analysis 45 CHAPTER FOUR 46 RESULTS 46 4.0 Status of Sericulture in Ghana 46 4.1 Demographic Characteristics of Sericulture Farmers 46 4.2 Production and Marketing of Mulberry Grown in Ghana 49 4.3 Rearing of Silkworm egg in Ghana 51 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh viii 4.4 Sericulture Training Programmes 52 4.5 Sources of Finance and Profitability of Mulberry 52 4.6 Field Experiment 1: 53 4.6.1 Soil physical and chemical properties 53 4.6.2 Leaf quality parameters 69 CHAPTER FIVE 92 DISCUSSION 92 5.0 The Status of Sericulture in Ghana 92 5.1 Demographic Characteristics of Sericulture Farmers 92 5.2 Influence of Inorganic N on Growth Parameters of Mulberry Varieties 93 5.3 Leaf Yield of Mulberry 94 5.4 Leaf Quality of Mulberry 94 CHAPTER SIX 96 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 96 6.0 Conclusion 96 6.1 Recommendations 96 REFERENCES 98 APPENDICES 112 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ix LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: World Mulberry Raw silk production 8 Table 2.2: Imports and exports of raw silk and by-products of silk globally 10 Table 2. 3: Annual Cocoon Production of Ghana 12 Table 3. 1: Mean monthly temperature (0C), rainfall (mm) and relative humidity (%) 32 Table 4. 1: Age of respondents 46 Table 4. 2: Land distribution in the Regions 48 Table 4.3: Varieties of mulberry grown in Ghana 49 Table 4. 4: Profitability of Sericulture 53 Table 4. 5: Soil Physical and chemical properties 53 Table 4. 6: Influence of inorganic N on number of branches per plant at 21 WAP 1 62 Table 4. 7: Influence of inorganic N on leaf fresh weight at 21 WAP 1 63 Table 4. 8: Influence of inorganic nitrogen and mulberry variety on mulberry leaf dry weight (g/plant) 64 Table 4. 9: Nitrogen influence on fresh leaf yield (kg/ha) of mulberry 65 Table 4.10: Influence of N sources on leaf dry yield (kg/ha) of mulberry 65 Table 4. 11: Influence of inorganic N on stem fresh weight of mulberry 66 Table 4. 12: Influence of N sources on stem dry weight (g) of mulberry 67 Table 4.13: Influence of inorganic N sources on total shoot yield at 21 WAP 1 67 Table 4.14: Influence of N sources on stem fresh yield (kg/ha) of mulberry varieties 68 Table 4. 15: Influence of N sources on stem dry yield (kg/ha) of mulberry 69 Table 4. 16: Influence of N source and Variety on fresh leaf moisture (%) 69 Table 4. 17: Leaf Crude protein (%) of fresh leaf 70 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh x Table 4. 18: Influence of inorganic N on leaf mineral (%) composition 71 Table 4. 19: Influence of N sources on N uptake into leaf 71 Table 4. 20: Leaf fresh weight (g) 80 Table 4. 21: Leaf dry weight (g) 81 Table 4. 22: Influence of N sources on fresh leaf yield (kg/ha) 82 Table 4. 23: Effect of N sources on leaf dry yield of mulberry 83 Table 4. 24: Influence of inorganic N on stem fresh weight (g) at 8 weeks after pruning 84 Table 4. 25: Influence of inorganic N on stem dry weight 85 Table 4. 26: Influence of N sources on stem fresh yield (kg/ha) at 8 weeks after pruning86 Table 4. 27: Influence of N sources on stem dry yield of mulberry varieties (kg/ha) at 8 weeks after pruning 87 Table 4. 28: Influence of N sources on total shoot yield (kg/ha) after pruning 88 Table 4. 29: Influence of N sources on leaf moisture of mulberry varieties 89 Table 4. 30: Influence of N on leaf protein content (%) 89 Table 4. 31: Influence of inorganic N sources on mineral composition of mulberry leaf 90 Table 4. 32: Influence of N sources on leaf N after pruning 91 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh xi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3. 1: A Map of Ghana Showing Districts and Communities in which Sericulture is practiced in Ghana 30 Figure 4.1: Level of Education of Respondents 47 Figure 4.2: Household Size of Respondents 47 Figure 4.3: Total land area cultivated to mulberry and other crops in Ghana 48 Figure 4.4: Reasons why farmers grow particular mulberry varieties 50 Figure 4. 5: Challenges in marketing of Cocoons 50 Figure 4. 6: Sources of Silkworm egg supply to Ghana 51 Figure 4. 7: Reasons for rearing Bivoltine Silkworm race 52 Figure 4. 8a: Influence of Urea on plant height (cm) 54 Figure 4. 8b: Influence of SoA on plant height (cm) 55 Figure 4.8c: Influence of NPK on plant height (cm) 55 Figure 4.8d: The height of control plants (cm) 56 Figure 4.9 a: Influence of Urea on number of leaves (cm) 57 Figure 4.9 b: Influence of SoA on number of leaves 57 Figure 4.9 c: Influence of NPK on number of leaves 58 Figure 4.9 d: Number of leaves per plant in the control 58 Figure 4.10 a: Influence of Urea on stem diameter 59 Figure 4.10 b: Influence of SoA on stem diameter 60 Figure 4.10 c: Influence of NPK on stem diameter 60 Figure 4.10 d: Stem diameter of control mulberry plants 61 Figure 4.11: Influence of inorganic N on number of sprouts per plant after pruning 72 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh xii Figure 4.12 a: Influence of Urea on plant height after pruning 73 Figure 4.12 b: Influence of SoA on plant height after pruning 73 Figure 4.12 c: Influence of NPK on plant height after pruning 74 Figure 4.12 d: Height of control plants after pruning 74 Figure 4.13 a: Influence of Urea on number of leaves per plant after pruning 75 Figure 4.13 b: Influence of SoA on number of leaves per plant after pruning 76 Figure 4.13 c:Influence of NPK on number of leaves per plant in experiment 2 76 Figure 4.13 d: Number of leaves per plant in the control 77 Figure 4.14 a: Influence of Urea on stem diameter after pruning 78 Figure 4.14 b: Influence of SoA on stem diameter after pruning 78 Figure 4.14 c: Influence of NPK on stem diameter after pruning 79 Figure 4.14 d: Control on stem diameter after pruning 79 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS B/A Brong- Ahafo Region CSIR Centre for Scientific and Industrial Research E/R Eastern Region J H S Junior High School M local Mysore local N Nitrogen N sources Nitrogen sources N/R Northern Region S H S/S S S Senior High School/Senior Secondary School SoA Sulphate of Ammonia SPDA Sericulture Promotion and Development Association W AP 2 Weeks after pruning WAP 1 Weeks after planting University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 1 CHAPTER ONE 1.0 Introduction Mulberry is a perennial woody plant which belongs to the family Moraceae and Genus Morus. The mulberry (Morus sp.) has about 100 known varieties and of these varieties only 10% are widely cultivated including Morus alba (Rajan et al. 2000). The mulberry tree is known as food for silkworm as well as an economic tree (Kasiviswanathan et al, 1988; Jayeola and Adeduntan, 2002). It is a hard crop that can be grown in uplands and non-irrigated areas as a rain fed crop. Depending on cultivation conditions, the tree can be grown as a bush, shrub or a tree (Rangaswami et al, 1976). Mulberry is economically productive under rainfed conditions and is cultivated mainly for the sericulture industry, as the leaves are the only food of the silkworm, Bombyx mori (Rangaswami et al, 1976). It is estimated that 1tonne of mulberry leaves will produce approximately 25-30kg cocoons when fed to silkworms (Rangaswami et al, 1976).One hectare of fertile land yields about 15 - 40 tonnes of mulberry leaves per annum depending on the variety of mulberry, agronomic practices and climatic conditions. To increase the quantity and quality of mulberry leaves for commercial sericulture in Ghana, there is the need for the application of appropriate fertilizers, irrigation systems, breeding of mulberry and selection of high yielding varieties and adoption of appropriate planting distances (Rangaswami et al, 1976). Nitrogen application to plants improves the nutrition of plants and enhances plant growth. Nitrogen also enhances the resistance of plants to pests and diseases and improve yield of crops (Simpson and Simpson, 1990). Over application and injudicious use of nitrogen (N) University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2 can result in plant lodging, vegetative growth at the expense of yield and vulnerability to pests and diseases (Imayavaramban et al., 2004). It is therefore important that this essential nutrient is supplied to crops in desirable quantities and at the right time during the growth period. Nitrogen fertilizer is a major nutrient for mulberry production. Nitrogen management optimizes leaf yield and leaf quality, while it minimizes the potential for leaching of N beyond the crop rooting zone. The factors which influence the quantity and quality of mulberry leaves include the rate of fertiliser application and its use by the plant (Krishnaswami et al.,1971), season (Yamanouchi et al.,2001), cropping density (Krishnaswami et al.,1971; Yamanouchi et al.,2001;Reddy et al. 2002; Baksh et al., 2000), and water use. The average temperature for maximum yield and optimum growth is 23 – 27oC and rainfall of 600 - 2500 mm per year (Rangaswami et al, 1976). All measures taken to maximise leaf yield simultaneously help to improve the quality of leaves which automatically lead to the production of quality cocoons (Rangaswami et al, 1976).Leaf yield and quality are significantly increased by adequate fertilisation (Wang et al., 2001).Mulberry varieties of higher leaf yields are therefore significant to sustainable profitability in sericulture (Das & Krishnaswami, 1965).The mulberry leaves are composed of the proteins, carbohydrates and minerals needed for growth and cocoon production. The mulberry is not only food for the silkworm but also used in many ways. Besides feeding silkworm, mulberry leaves, shoots and branches can be used as feed for other animals such as poultry, goats, sheep and cattle, the fruit is used to prepare fruit juice, University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3 jams and liquors. The fruits are also useful in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries (Ercisli and Orhan, 2007) and as human food, the wood for firewood or for arts and craft purposes and for their medicinal properties. Sericulture thrives on the suitability of environmental factors, quality and high yielding mulberry varieties and on high yielding silkworm races. It is estimated that more than 60% of the production cost of cocoon is incurred by mulberry leaf production. Sericulture is an industry which involves the production of cocoon and raw silk. It is composed of activities such as breeding and maintenance of silkworm races, mulberry breeding and cultivation, silkworm egg production, silkworm rearing and mounting, cocoon drying, silk reeling, raw silk testing, to the production of silk products by manufacturing and weaving, as well as the silk thread and silk fabric (Ntaanu, 2007). Silk farming is an eco- friendly, agro-based venture with a great potential for environmental amelioration, employment and income generation, artisan‟s development, diversification of agriculture, and expansion of export earnings (Kioko et al., 2009; Ntaanu, 2007).Sericulture can be undertaken as rural micro-enterprise initiatives by resource-poor farming communities which depend on the forest. This will help to reduce the pressure on the natural forest and conserve biodiversity. Sericulture requires low investment for establishment. Small area of land and capital are needed for its start-up (FAO, 2001; Ntaanu, 2007). Farmers with low income and little area of land can undertake this venture to earn additional profit. Though some farmers engage in sericulture as a commercial enterprise, it is a subsidiary source of income for rural communities who are for most of their time engaged in other farming activities. This can be explored to increase the income of farmers in the rural communities in order to alleviate poverty in the larger society. Sericulture has three main University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 4 components and these are; Agriculture, Industry and Art. The agriculture component of sericulture involves the production of mulberry leaf for silkworm rearing and subsequent cocoon production. The industry (sericulture) depends on the availability of quality cocoon which also depend on the type of mulberry produced and the rearing techniques used. This means that the production of silk fabric depend strongly on agriculture. In this study the current status of the sericulture industry in Ghana would be established and this would help in policy formulation and decision making about the sericulture industry in Ghana. It would also form the data base upon which investment in the industry would be based in order to attract investment into the industry and help government to use sericulture as a tool for alleviating poverty and also for conservation of forest and biodiversity. The selection of high yielding mulberry varieties would enable farmers to produce high quality and quantity of mulberry for high quality silk for both the local and global silk market. Awareness of the potential of silk farming in improving the livelihoods of rural communities would be created. This would in turn influence investment in the industry and also entice more rural folks and even urban dwellers to take up sericulture as a means of livelihood. 1.1 Problem statement Mulberry has been growing in various parts of Ghana since 1994 (Ntaanu, 2012). Different varieties have been introduced into the country but the suitability of specific cultivars to the different ecological zones has not been studied and the influence of nitrogen on leaf yield and quality is also not established. In Ghana mulberry cultivation and cocoon production takes place in almost all the ten regions. The current number of University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5 farmers engaged in sericulture need to be updated and also the size of land under mulberry cultivation is not known. The source of the silkworm eggs into the country is not established and also there is no reliable market for raw cocoon in the country. The low level of productivity in the sericulture industry in Ghana can among others be attributed to these factors. 1.2 Objectives of the Study The study sought to establish the current status of sericulture industry in Ghana and to determine the influence of different sources of inorganic fertilizer on growth, leaf quality and regeneration of mulberry varieties. Specifically the study sought to achieve the following objectives: Determine the number of farmers engaged in sericulture in Ghana. Establish the land area under mulberry cultivation in each region of Ghana Ascertain the constraints associated with Cocoon marketing/processing in Ghana Determine the sources of silkworm egg supply in Ghana Determine the influence of different sources of inorganic nitrogen on the growth, leaf quality and yield of mulberry varieties University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 6 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 2.0 The sericulture industry Mulberry has been growing in Ghana since 1994 (Ntaanu, 2012) in various parts of the country. Different varieties have been introduced into the country but the suitability of specific cultivars to the different ecological zones has not been studied and the influence of nitrogen on leaf yield and quality is also not established. In Ghana mulberry cultivation and cocoon production takes place in almost all the ten regions. The current number of farmers engaged in sericulture is yet to be established and also the size of land under mulberry cultivation is not known. The source of the silkworm eggs into the country is not established and also there is no reliable market for raw cocoon in the country. The low level of productivity in the sericulture industry in Ghana can among others be attributed to these factors. 2.1 Importance of sericulture Sericulture is a profitable rural activity which has the capacity to yield income in a short period of time. It also requires minimal investment and has maximum employment potential and quick turnover for investment (Kasi, 2000, 2009a; 2009d). In India, sericulture is practised in about 69,000 villages (Central Silk Board, 2002; Geetha and Indira, 2011; Lakshmanan et al., 2011). Sericulture generates direct and indirect employment in various ways. First, mulberry cultivation creates employment on farms. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 7 Secondly, cocoon production, which uses mulberry leaves as an input, creates large-scale employment for family members of the mulberry growers. There are even instances where non-mulberry growers take up cocoon production alone as a full-time occupation. They buy leaves from mulberry growers and then use them as raw material for cocoon production. Further, the reeling activity is also done locally, either in the rural areas or in semi urban areas and the employment generated by this activity certainly helps to reduce rural unemployment. Although sericulture has been considered as a secondary occupation in rural areas, recent technological advancements have pave way for the practice of sericulture on a commercial scale, yielding greater profits than most agricultural ventures and hence it can be assessed for its feasibility in developing countries such as Ghana (Dingle et al., 2005). Due to the fact that it has the highest employment capacity and because most people who depend and engage in agriculture are poor and live in the rural areas, increase in agricultural income is more effective in reducing poverty in any country (Christiaensen and Demery, 2007; World Bank, 2008b). One sure way or strategy of achieving poverty reduction and sustainable forest conservation is through silk farming or sericulture. This industry has the capacity to engage the unemployed youth, increase the income of farmers and provide an alternative source of livelihood for rural communities and this will reduce or totally remove dependence of rural population on the ever depleting forest which in turn will conserve biodiversity. The artisan industry in Ghana can also be developed and well expanded through silk farming. This is because the silk yarn produced can serve as the raw material University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 8 for these small scale industries which will also create more employment. Kente and Smock weavers import cotton yarns because what is produced is not enough to feed the industry. Silk yarns when locally produced can substitute for cotton. 2.2 Global silk production Silk is produced across the length and breadth of the globe with China and India being the leading producers (Table 2.1). The main silk-producing countries of the world include China, India, DPR Korea, Turkmenistan, Brazil, Uzbekistan, Thailand, Vietnam, Kyrgyzstan, Japan, Iran, Tajikistan, Romania and Indonesia (FAO, 2001). Table 2.1: World Mulberry Raw silk production Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 % Share China 87800 93100 78000 70980 84000 81.06 India 15445 16526 16245 15610 16322 15.75 Japan 150 150 105 95 90 0.09 Brazil 1285 1387 1220 1177 811 0.78 Korea Rep. 150 150 150 135 135 0.13 Uzbekistan 950 950 950 865 750 0.72 Thailand 1420 1080 760 1100 665 0.64 Vietnam 750 750 750 680 550 0.53 Others 1500 1000 500 350 304 0.29 Total 109450 115092 98680 90992 103627 100.00 Note:Unit in Metric tonsSource: Silk industry in China; ISC web-site update as on January, 2010; SS: 11-05-2010 Some African countries such as Kenya, Egypt, Nigeria and Madagascar have also made significant contributions to the production of silk globally. World silk production has almost doubled in the last decade and continues to increase despite the production of synthetic fibres to replace silk for some uses (Dingle et al., 2005). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 9 China and India are the two main producers of silk worldwide, together manufacturing more than 50% of the world production each year. China since the 1970's has drastically increased its silk production and has become the world's leading producer of silk. China was the first country to develop sericulture and it is also the leading producer of silk of all kinds. In the year 2003-2004, India produced 16,319 MT of raw silk out of which 14,617 MT is mulberry silk and India is the second largest producer of silk in the world next to China. Tasar, Eri and Muga silk contributes 284, 1316 and 102 MT respectively to the world total silk (Anon., 2003). Mulberry Silk is the most common type of silk and contributes to nearly 95% of world‟s silk production. It is produced from the cocoons of silkworms fed with mulberry leaves. 2.2.1 Global Imports and Exports of Silk and Silk Products There has been a significant change in relation to silk market in the last decade. Silk is a raw material which is traded in the form of cocoons, raw silk, waste silk, silk noils (short, tangled fibres) and spun silk or yarn. Silk products are relatively less expensive compared to other fabrics and also silk has a unique property which makes it stand out among other fabrics. Some of the properties of silk are; It can absorb moisture without feeling damp and its cool-in-summer, warm-in winter and this property is yet to be matched by other synthetics; Durability (ability to withstand wear and decay) as a result used for suture materials; Flame resistance, which makes it suitable for wall coverings and upholstery. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 10 These and many others give silk a competitive advantage over other fabrics (Dingle, 2000). Silk is widely used for producing various silk fabrics such as dresses, kimonos, quilt covers and ties. By-products of cocoons such as inferior cocoon, un-reelable cocoon, pupal shirt, cocoon floss and waste filaments are utilized as raw materials in cosmetics, foodstuffs and in the electric industry. New developments in silk technology allow silk garments to be hand washed rather than dry-cleaned (Gongyin and Cui, 1996). World trade in silk is divided almost equally between raw silk, fabrics and finished goods (Dingle et al., 2005). India converts a high proportion of its raw silk into silk fabrics and exports about 20%. China produces over 81% of the world's raw silk and exports about 40% of the world's silk fabric. Imports of raw silk to Europe has reduced and attention is been moved to the importation of fabrics and finished garments. Italian and Belgian companies handle about 85% of the European silk trade (FAO, 2001). Table 2.2: Shows the imports and exports of raw silk and by-products of silk globally Country Exports in 1999(Mt) Imports in 1999(Mt) Bangladesh 2200 China 12089 173 Germany 590 963 Hong Kong 1048 1059 India 17 2743 Italy 22 2695 Japan 3 2596 Korea(DPR) 1000 5 Korea(South) 11 2107 Kyrgyzstan 20 250 Paraguay 224 - Singapore 157 120 Tajikistan 150 - Thailand 8 75 Turkey - 154 Turkmenistan 4100 - Uzbekistan 240 - Vietnam 60 90 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 11 The data provided on silk production and demand for silk globally indicates that there is an opportunity for developing countries like Ghana to enter into silk production. The environmental conditions are suitable for the cultivation of mulberry and rearing of silk worm nationwide. There is good market for cocoons and raw silk in Africa and the continent has not been able to meet its demand for silk and silk products. Some African countries which have established market for cocoons include: Kenya, Egypt, South Africa, Madagascar and Ghana. Silk markets in Kenya include National Sericulture Station, Thika, International Centre for Insect Physiology and Entomology (ICIPE), Kakamega Forest Silk Market Centre, in Kakamega, Pendeza Weaving, in Kisumu, Spin Weave, in Nairobi, Gramwa, in Kiambu. Other cocoon markets across the length and breadth of Kenya are; Mwingi Silk Market Place, in Mwingi, Arabuko Sokoke Silk Market Place, in Malindi, Molo Weavers, in Elburgon, Rivatex, in Eldoret (Prospective large scale buyer), Kimahuri youth group in Nyeri county and Sarah Jane in Nairobi. This makes Kenya a better place in Africa to embark on commercial cocoon production as compared to the situation in Ghana. 2.3 Raw Silk Cocoon Production in Ghana The production of cocoon in Ghana started with the establishment of the silk factory in Accra in 2004. The factory was established by the partnership between FAO, Ghana government and the government of India. The funding for the establishment was provided by FAO and Technical expertise was provided by the government of India. The major stakeholders are Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA), Institute of Industry Research (IIR-CSIR) and Sericulture Promotion and Development Association (SPDA). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 12 The major areas of raw cocoon production are; Brong-Ahafo Region and Eastern Region and Kpaliga in the Northern Region. The quantities of cocoon produced for the operation of the factory was insufficient and could not meet the production capacity of the factory (Amoah, 2012). The table below shows the annual cocoon production of Ghana. Table 2. 3: Annual Cocoon Production of Ghana Year Quantity produced (kg) 2004 112.4 2005 65.5 2006 154.5 2007 134.2 2008 326.6 2009 146.5 2010 50 2011 50 Source: Amoah, J. (2012). In spite of the great potential and environmental suitability of the country, the cocoons produced over the years are most of the times low quality with reference to reelability and the denier of the yarns. This can be attributed to the race of the silkworm reared, the quality of the mulberry leaf fed to the worms, the rearing technique used, climatic conditions and other factors. Ghana has not been able to explore its great potentials for the production of silk as a result of the challenges that beset the silk industry. These challenges include: Unavailability of market for the cocoons and price discrimination; Long distance to market; University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 13 Inadequate information on market trend; Lack of finance. 2.4 Description of mulberry plant Mulberry (Morus, Moraceae) is a fast growing deciduous woody tree with alternate leaves, it has unisexual and bisexual flowers in the leaf axils, and fleshy fruits (sorosis). It is believed that mulberry first originated in the hills of Himalayas and later spread into Asia, Europe, Africa, and America (Sanchez, 2000a, b). Currently, mulberry is grown in many parts of the world (Yokoyama 1962); and from sea level to altitudes as high as 4000 m (Tutin et al., 1996). Taxonomically, the genus, Morus, is divided into two sections, the Dolichostylae (long style) and the Macromorus (short style) and each section is further divided into two groups namely Papillosae and Pubescentae based on the nature of the stigmatic hairs. Further classification of mulberry is based on characters of leaf, inflorescence and sorosi (Koidzumi 1917 and Katsumata, 1972). About 150 species and more of mulberry have been identified but most of them have been treated either as synonyms or as varieties rather than species, and some have also been transferred to allied genera (Sharma et al. 2000). A few prominent species of Morus, which have wide acceptance among mulberry taxonomists and geneticists, are M. alba, M. indica,M. serrata, M. laevigata, M. multicaulis, M. tartarica, M. nigra M. australia, M. cathyana, M. mierovra M. atropurpurea , M. mizuho, M. rubra, M. insgnis, M. mesozygia, and M. macroura. Mulberry has a deep-root system. The leaves are simple, alternate, stipulate, petiolate, entire or lobed. Number of lobes varies from 1 to 5. Plants are generally dioecious. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 14 Inflorescence is catkin with pendent or drooping peduncle bearing unisexual flowers. The main pollinating agent in mulberry is wind. The fruit is a sorosis and the colour of the fruit is mainly violet black (Datta, 2007). The Chemical composition of mulberry leaf varies with variety, age of plant, nutrition and environmental conditions (Datta, 2007). However, the general chemical leaf composition is as follows: Moisture 65 - 78 % Protein 19 – 25 % Minerals 10 – 15 % Reducing sugars 1.2 – 1.9 Sugars 10 – 15 % 2.4.1 Description of some Mulberry Varieties Kanva-2 variety/ M-5: Belongs to Morus indica and it is a diploid. It is widely cultivated in the tropical areas of India. It was obtained by selections from natural population of Mysore Local variety. It has high rooting ability and wide adaptability and it is able to resist mulberry diseases. The leaves mature in a relatively short time with yields ranging between 30 - 35 MT/ha/year under irrigation condition (Datta, 2007). Leaf composition Leaf moisture content 70%, Protein content 21% and Sugar content 11.5% University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 15 S-36: It was developed from Berhampore local and belongs to Morus indica. The leaves are heart shaped, thick, light green and shiny. It is tolerant to leaf spot and powdery mildew but susceptible to leaf rust and tukra infestation. Due to its high moisture content, it is more suitable for chawky rearing. It yields about 38-45 MT/ha/year under irrigation. Leaf composition Leaf moisture 76% Protein content 22% V-1: Belongs to Morus indica. It was developed as a cross between S-30 and Berc.776. It has high rooting and sprouting ability and highly recommended for cultivation under irrigation. The leaves are broad, thick, dark green and oval in shape. The leaf yield under irrigation is about 55-70 MT/ha /year. It is resistant to leaf spot, leaf rust and tukra infestation (Datta, 2007). Leaf composition Leaf moisture 72.5-78.9% Protein 24.6% Total sugar 16.9% 2.4.2 Economic importance of mulberry The economic importance of mulberry is primarily due to its leaves, which are being used for feeding the silkworm for silk production. Mulberry is also utilised as forage for livestock due its high protein and mineral content and palatability (Sanchez, 2000b). The fruits are used as antiphlogistic, a diuretic and as expectorant and also for fruit juice and University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 16 jams (Koyuncu, 2004; Ercisli, 2004). Mulberry is also consumed as a delicious vegetable (young leaves and stems). It is used in the pharmaceuticals due its medicinal properties and traditionally as mulberry leaf tea. The mulberry plant has medicinal value and it is used traditionally for healing asthma, bronchitis, cachexia, cold, constipation, cough, diarrhoea, dropsy, dyspepsia, edema, epilepsy, fever, headache, hyperglycemia, hypertension, insomnia, melancholy, menorrhagia, snakebite, sore throat, stomatitis, tumors, and wounds including other kinds of diseases (Datta, 2007). The wood is used as firewood, building material, and in furniture making. It is also used for making stocks, spokes, poles, shafts of carriages and casts. The wood is suitable for making plywood, carving and making of toys and tea chests, tennis rackets, agricultural implements and cheap types of rifles and guns (Datta, 2007). The plant is used in landscaping (Tipton, 1994). 2.5 Cultivation of mulberry Mulberry thrives well in deep, fertile, well drained soils with high organic matter content. It grows on sandy loam to black loam soil which has good water holding capacity with soil pH of 6.2-6.8. The average temperature for maximum yield and optimum growth is 23 – 27 oC and rainfall of 600 - 2500 mm per year (Rangaswami et al. 1976; Datta, 2007). Planting materials and planting Mulberry is planted using cuttings and seeds. The use of cuttings is the most common method of propagation. The cuttings can be planted directly in the field and can also be raised in the nursery and the saplings transplanted after 2-3 months. Cuttings are obtained from mature plants of 8-10 months at a length of 25-30cm with 4-6 healthy buds. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 17 Establishment of mulberry farm starts at the beginning of the raining season. The planting distance adopted is 90cm x 90cm or 60cm x 60cm in single row or the double row system (Datta, 2007). Pests and diseases There are numerous pests and diseases of the mulberry plant. The pests are mostly insects and the major ones include; 1. Pink mealy bug (Maconellicoccus hirsutus) and papaya mealy bug (Paracoccus marginatus). The mealybugs feed by sucking sap of apical and tender shoots. Their feeding activity leads to the spread of diseases. The pink mealybug is known for the transmission of the Tukra disease of mulberry. 2. Thrips, Pseudodendrothrips mori; Bathrips melenicornis; Megalurothrips distalis and Scirtothrips dorsalis: Both adults and nymphs lacerate the leaf tissue and suck the oozing cell sap from young buds and leaves. The infested parts get hardened; leaves become brittle, malformed with reduced leaf area. In addition, sap extraction by the thrips results in necrosis and drying up of leaves. Due to thrips infestation, the epidermal cells get punctured, leaves and buds become rudimentary resulting in premature fall. During laceration, the thrips secrete saliva which coagulates with sap resulting in the formation of white streaks in early stage. 3. Mites : mites belonging to Tetranychidae and Eriophyidae are known to infest mulberry. This include; Bud mites, Aceria morikcifes (Eriophydae); Tetranychus equitorius (Tetranychidae); and T. ludani (Tetranychidae).Mites are found on the leaves, bud scales, nodes and apical shoots. Both nymphs and adults insert their stylets in to leaf tissue and suck the sap. The affected portion of the plant turns grayish white and University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 18 ultimately withers. The leaves infested by T.ludani show white speckles at the place of feeding. With increase in intensity of feeding, the speckles increase in number and gradually coalesce with one another, finally producing large patches. Infested plants remain stunted for a longer period without any sign of growth. 4. Bihar hairy caterpillar: Spilosoma (Diacrisia) oblique. The young caterpillars feed on the chlorophyll layer of the leaf exposing the veins which impart dried/dead appearance to the leaves (Skeletonization). The grown up larva feed on the entire leaf rendering the branches without leaves. 5. Other insect pests of mulberry are; leaf webber (Diaphania pulverulentalis), grasshoppers, leaf miners and termites. Management of insect pests and Diseases of mulberry Effective weed control, pruning infested parts, appropriate planting distance, appropriate use of recommended insecticides and biological control. It is estimated that the incidence of pests can cause loss in mulberry leaf yield up to 34.24% and 4500 kg/ha/year (Sakthivel, 2012). Diseases attack the foliage and stems and roots. Foliar diseases of mulberry reduce the yield and quality of leaf thereby affecting silkworm rearing and cocoon production. The yield loss due to foliar diseases is estimated to be around 15-18%, besides deteriorating the leaf quality. The diseases which infect the leaves include: 1. Powdery mildew : It is caused by Phyllactinia corylea Symptoms: White powdery patches appear on the lower surface of leaf which increases gradually and covers the whole leaf surface. Affected leaves turn yellowish and drop prematurely. The disease becomes more severe around October-November. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 19 Control measure: Foliar spray with the recommended fungicides and also the lower surface of the leaves should be thoroughly drenched. 2. Leaf rust : The causal organism is called Peridiospora mori Symptoms: Several small pin head shaped brown postules appear on the lower surface of mature leaves. Reddish brown spot appear on the upper surface of the infected leaves. Severely infected leaves turn yellowish and margin of the leaves become dry. Control measure: Foliar spray with recommended fungicide 3. Leaf spot : The causal organism is Cercospora moricola Symptoms: circular light brown spots appear on both sides of the leaves. The adjacent spots unite together to form a larger spot. The necrotic tissues of such spots drop out and form the characteristic shot holes. Highly infected leaves defoliate prematurely. Control measure: Avoid dense planting and also collect and burn unused infected leaves after pruning. 4. Root knot disease: The estimated yield loss due to the disease is 15-30%. The organism that causes the root knot disease is a nematode called Meloidogyne incognita. It is an endoparasite which inhabits mulberry roots. The symptoms of the disease can be grouped into two, namely; Foliage symptoms: which is characterised by stunted growth, poor and delayed sprouting, reduced leaf size and yield, chlorosis and marginal necrosis of leaves, yellowing and wilting of leaves in spite of adequate soil moisture availability and death of plants in severe cases? Root symptoms: formation of galls on roots, reduced and stubby root system, retarded root growth, necrotic lesions on the root surfaces and death of active rootlets. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 20 Control: Plant resistant varieties, recommended nematicide can be used in infested soils or farms. 5. Tukra disease: it is caused by the pink mealybug, Maconellicoccus hirsutus. The nymph and adult mealybug feed by sucking the sap of young and apical shoot. Symptoms: leaves become dark green and deformed, swelling and twisting of apices of internodes, leaf curl and crinkling of apical shoots, flattening and thickening of the affected part of shoot and presence of white mealybugs and crawlers at the base of leaves in the malformed regions of the shoot. Control: plant resistant varieties of mulberry, clear farm off weeds, clipping and destruction of affected apical shoots, biological control of mealybugs with Cryptolaemus montrouzeri beetle and also apply recommended insecticide. Yield: the leaf yield of mulberry depends on factors such as variety, cultivation practices and climatic conditions and plant density (Yamanouchi et al., 2001). The yield of some varieties are; Kanva-2 - 30-35Mt/ha/year; S-36 - 35-38Mt/ha/year; V-1 - 70Mt/ha/year; K-2 – 10-12 MT/ha/year; S-13 – 14-15 MT/ha/year and S-34 – 14-15 MT/ha/year (Datta, 2007). Harvesting and postharvest handling Mulberry leaves will be ready for harvesting 6 months after planting. There are three methods of leaf harvesting. These are; individual leaf picking, branch cutting and whole shoot cutting. In individual leaf picking, individual leaves are picked together with leaf petiole whiles the other methods involve the cutting of branches and whole shoot. Young and succulent leaves should be harvested for chawky rearing and mature leaves for mature worms. The leaves should be harvested early in the morning or evening when University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 21 temperatures are cool. This is to reduce loss of moisture from fresh leaves. Moisture loss from leaves reduces the edibility and palatability of leaves for silkworms. Leaf preservation after harvest is therefore important especially in situations where the rearing house is far from the mulberry farm. Fresh leaves should be stored in wet jute sacks or wooden baskets lined with moist jute sack or material. Leaves preserved under wet cloth and jute sacks should be kept wet all the time by sprinkling water on it repeatedly at intervals. Leaves preserved as such remain fresh with high moisture and protein content and are easily digestible to worms (Sakthivel, 2012). 2.6 Influence of inorganic nitrogen on plant growth, leaf yield and leaf quality Nitrogen (N) is often one of the most limiting nutrients in crop production. Hence, the application of nitrogenous fertilizers results in increased biomass production and protein yield. Nitrogen is an essential component of the cell membrane, chlorophyll molecule and many other compounds essential for plant growth processes. It is an essential component of proteins, amides, amino acids, nucleic acids and nucleotides which are critical for building plant tissues, cell nuclei and protoplasm. Nitrogen stimulates vegetative growth and induces the deep green colour of leaves. Nitrogen enhances roots and shoots development and influences the uptake of other macronutrients and micro nutrients. It is known that Nitrogen fertilizer is an essential component of any system in which the primary objective is to maintain good yield (Law and Egharevba, 2009). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 22 Increases in productivity of mulberry has been possible as a result of irrigation, fertilizer application particularly nitrogen and other agronomic practices. It is estimated that mulberry production constitutes 60 per cent of the total cost of sericulture. Much research evidence has shown that fertilizer application increases the crop yields but without fertilizer high yielding varieties cannot perform better than the local varieties (Munireddy, 2005). However, different varieties respond differently to nutrient application as a result of differences in their genetic composition and physiological processes (Chandra et al., 1992). 2.7 Influence of inorganic nitrogen on growth and leaf yield of mulberry The use of fertilizer especially nitrogen fertilizers increases the growth and yield of crops. The application of nitrogen promotes leaf growth and expansion. Mulberry is a plant which responds well to the application of nitrogen fertilizers which result in higher leaf yield. This has been reported by many researchers. Pain (1965) reported lower leaf yields in mulberry when fertilizers other than nitrogen fertilizers were used. This report highlights the importance of nitrogen fertilizers in mulberry cultivation. Majumder et al. (2003) investigated the influence of nitrogen on mulberry and reported that the application of 200, 250 and 300 kg N/ha/year to S-1 mulberry in spring season increased the leaf yield as compared to the control (150 kg N/ha/year). They also indicated that higher dosages of inorganic nitrogen are significant for leaf production in mulberry cultivation. Bose and Majumder (1998) conducted studies into the influence of nitrogen on mulberry and reported that the application of 400:120:120 kg NPK/ ha/year to M-5 mulberry variety increased the leaf yield and other vegetative parameters more than the control. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 23 The application of inorganic nitrogen and organic fertilizers also significantly increases leaf yield in mulberry cultivation. This has been confirmed by studies of many researchers. Sinha et al. (2001) in their work on mulberry found that S-1 mulberry variety produced significant leaf yield when150:50:50 kg NPK/ha/year was combined with 10 tonnes of FarmYard Manure and applied compared to the control. Shankar et al. (2000) achieved higher yields when Farm Yard Manure at a rate of 20 tonnes/ha in a year was applied in combination with 280:120:120 kg NPK/ha/year as compared to the application of only Farm Yard Manure. This implies that the presence of inorganic N is important in optimizing crop yield. Also in the study of the effect of different spacing and nitrogen levels on different varieties of mulberry by Bongale et al. (2000), the S-36 variety produced significant leaf yield at 400kg N as compared to smaller levels of nitrogen. Regular irrigation, appropriate planting densities and judicious use of nitrogen result in higher leaf yield and leaf quality (nitrogen and protein). The study by Shivaprakash et al., (2000) revealed that at a spacing of 60cm × 60cm under irrigated condition, S-36 produced higher leaf yield and leaf quality (nitrogen) at 300:120:120 kg NPK/ha/year. Singh et al. (2001) also conducted research on the response of mulberry varieties to different levels of NPK in different seasons and reported that at 250:120:110 kg NPK/ha/year, the M-5 variety produced maximum leaves per branch (24.7) in spring, 46.8 in autumn). They also observed an increase in plant height and leaf yield. In the same way, 100 kg N /ha/year nitrogen increased the leaf yield of mulberry as compared to 50 kg/ha/year nitrogen in split applications (Anon, 1971). Kasiviswanathan and University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 24 Iyengar (1970) also reported higher leaf yield in 200 kg N /ha/year than was found in 100 kg N per ha/year. Several authors have reported that the application of NPK increases number of leaves and leaf area of plants (Bijimol and Singh, 2001; Broschat and Moore , 2001; Hend ,2002; Kumar et al. 2002 and Dar et al. 2002). Improved varieties of crops especially mulberry require higher dosages of nitrogen fertilizers. Inadequate supply of this nutrient to improved varieties will hinder their ability to perform better than local varieties. Phukan et al. (2000) studied different improved varieties of mulberry and found out that cv. S-1635 was significant in terms of plant height and leaf yield in India. The application of higher dosage of nitrogen to improved mulberry varieties increased the leaf yield more than smaller dosages. Krishnaswami et al. (1971) realised significant improvement in economic characters including leaf yield of improved mulberry varieties when heavy dosage of Nitrogen (900 kg/ha) was applied as compared to local varieties given wider spacing and 100 kg/ha of nitrogen. Karic et al. (2005) reported maximum number of leaves per plant at 200kg N/ha but no significant effect was noticed on the number of leaves at 100 kg N/ha which is similar to that obtained by Shahbazi (2005) who recorded maximum number of leaves per plant at 200kg N/ha when four nitrogen levels (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg N/ha) was used. Bhaskar et al. (2003) also studied M-5 mulberry under irrigated condition with varied levels of N (200-280 kg/ha/year), P (80-140 kg /ha/ year) and K (80-140 kg/ha/year) and reported that application of 280:80:80 kg NPK/ha/year significantly improved number of leaves per plant, leaf area and moisture content and other growth parameters as compared University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 25 to control. Rajegowda et al (1999) reported increased in plant growth, leaf yield and leaf quality parameters (moisture and chlorophyll) when N and K2SO4 was applied at a rate of 400:180kg/ha/year in M-5 as compared to 300:120kg/ha/year (N and KCl). Studies have shown that the application of 75-100 kg N/ha/year increased the growth and leaf yield of mulberry. It has been observed that response to nitrogen increased with increased soil moisture (Kasiviswanathan and Iyengar, 1965). Anon (1969) reported that it was necessary to apply nitrogen to mulberry every year under irrigated conditions as the residual effect of nitrogen was not significant. Significantly higher yields were recorded in split applications of 200kg N/ha/year than split application of 100kg N /ha/year (Kasivishanathan and Iyengar, 1970). Paul and Qaiyyum (2009) also studied the effect of different levels of NPK fertilizers and irrigation on leaf yield and nutritive quality of mulberry leaf of three mulberry varieties. They found out that BM-1 had significant increase in plant height and leaf number per plant than the other varieties but number of branches and leaf yield were significantly higher in BM-3 than the rest. They also reported increased growth and higher leaf yield in fertilizer treated plants than the control. Bongale et al. (2000) studied the effect of different plant densities and nitrogen levels on Viswa (DD), S-36 and M-5 mulberry (Morus indica L.) varieties under irrigated condition and reported the highest leaf yield and leaf N uptake in S-36 with the application of 400kg N/ha. They reported significant increase in leaf number, plant height, leaf N content and uptake and leaf yield with the application of 400kg N/ha University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 26 2.7.1 Influence of inorganic nitrogen on leaf quality of mulberry Manchashetty (1979) observed that when nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium are applied at 0.5% as soil and foliar spray the leaf quality with reference to crude protein and mineral content of mulberry increased. Sarkar et al. (2000) reported high leaf quality in V-1 mulberry variety with the application of NPK in combination with Farm Yard Manure as compared to Mysore local, M-5, S-54 and S-36 under irrigation. According to Sengupta et al. (1972) the application of 600 and 900 kg N increased leaf yield of M-5 mulberry variety which also resulted in increased high leaf quality (high leaf protein, reducing sugar and total sugar content of leaves). The application of different sources of inorganic nitrogen influences the leaf quality of mulberry differently. This has been confirmed by Subbarayappa et al. (1994) who reported that the application of ammonium sulphate increased leaf quality of mulberry as compared with the control (no fertilizer), ammonium nitrate and urea. Subbaswamy etal. (1999) also studied the influence of different sources of inorganic nitrogen fertilizers on leaf quality of mulberry and reported higher leaf yield and high leaf protein content in plants fertilised with ammonium sulphate as compared with plants fertilised with calcium ammonium nitrate and urea. Ushioda (1954) reported that nitrogen has the highest influence on leaf quality, leaf protein content and moisture content of leaves when supplied through fertilizers. Ray et al. (1973) reported increased leaf yield and leaf quality in terms of protein and mineral content in M-5 mulberry variety with the application of NPK in combination with Farm Yard Manure. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 27 Yokayama (1962); Kasivishwanathan and Iyengar (1965 and 1966) have reported that fertilization of mulberry with nitrogen increased the leaf yield and leaf quality. Many authors also agree that the application of nitrogen fertilizer result in increased protein content of crops and hence increased crop quality (Abu-Rayyan and Al-Hadidi, 2005; Balemi et al., 2007; Shaheen et al., 2010; Imtiaz et al., 1995). It has been observed by El Hassan (2010) that the application of different sources of nitrogen has different effects on the quality of leaves. He observed that the application of NPK and Ammonium sulphate significantly increased the crude protein of leaves except urea. His result agrees with the findings of Singh et al., (1992) and Koul (1997) who also reported increased leaf protein with the application of nitrogen. Paul and Qaiyyum (2009) reported that the leaf quality of BM-3 mulberry variety was higher than BM-1 and BM-2 varieties except for leaf moisture. They added that the application of NPK fertilizers significantly increased the leaf quality of mulberry more than the control. They observed that increasing NPK reduces the mineral content of mulberry leaf. Marzouk and Kassem (2011) reported the application of inorganic fertilizers reduces the protein and the carbohydrate content of crops. Also, Anon (1994a) reported that the application of 300:120:120 kg NPK/ha/year had no influence on the water use efficiency and the leaf quality of V-1 and S-36 mulberry varieties except the chlorophyll content of leaves. This implies that the application of inorganic fertilizers do not always improve the quality of mulberry leaves. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 28 CHAPTER THREE MATERIALS AND METHODS 3.1 The Survey A survey was conducted in January and February, 2012 starting with identification of regions and districts in which sericulture is practiced in Ghana. This was done with the help of Mr. Ntaanu, the Founder and Technical Director of Sericulture Promotion and Development Association of Ghana (SPDA). After the preliminary observations the following communities were selected for in-depth study: Kpaliga, in the Tolon- Kumbungu District in the northern Region, Odumase and Kwatre in the Sunyani West District in the Brong – Ahafo Region, and Pukrom in the Akuapim South District of the Eastern Region. Sixteen (16) sericulture farmers were interviewed and out of the 16 farmers, five (5) were female and eleven (11) were male. The Sericulture Associations interviewed were Community Based Rural Project (Sericulture) at Kwatre and Kpaliga Tree Growers Association. There was only one farm at Pukrom and that was also visited. The issues discussed centered on the variety of mulberry cultivated, land area for mulberry cultivation, Race of silkworm reared, rearing technique used, source of silkworm egg supply and constraints associated with rearing and marketing of cocoons in Ghana. The silk factory at CSIR compound was visited and informal interviews and discussions were held with staff of the factory to assess the status of the factory in terms of production level and constraints. The Asuansi Farm Institute was also visited to assess the progress of work by the Ministry of Food and Agriculture in multiplying some varieties of mulberry and also establishment of a sericulture training center. Informal discussions University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 29 were also held with staff to obtain information on sericulture. This approach was adopted to get an in-depth understanding of the issues discussed with farmer groups and other relevant stakeholders. The Tolon-Kumbungu District lies between latitude 10-200 North and Longitude 10- 500 West, shares border with West Mamprusi District in the North, West Gonja District in the West and South and the East with Savelugu/Nanton District and the Tamale Municipal Assembly. The District covers an area of about 2,741 square kilometres (Ghana districts.com). The Sunyani West District lies between latitude 7º 19´N and 7º 35´N and longitudes 2º 08´ W and 2º 31´ W. It shares boundaries with Wenchi Municipality to the North - East, Tain District to the North, Berekum and Dormaa East to the West, Sunyani Municipal to the South East and to the Eastern boundaries of the District are the Tano North and Ofinso North Districts. Sunyani West District has a total land area of 1658.7 square kilometers. The district enjoys two rainy seasons in the year and the abundance of rainfall offers the district a favourable climate for agricultural production (Ghana districts.com). The Akuapim-South District covers a land area of 403 square kilometres. The total arable land under cultivation is about 20,000 hectares. The district shares boundaries with Ga West Municipal and and Tema Metropolis to the south, Suhum- Kraboa-Coaltar, Akuapim North and West Akim Municipal to the North-West respectively. About 60% of the population is engaged in subsistence and commercial farming. The district enjoys bimodal rainfall which creates favourable climatic conditions for agricultural activities (mofa.gov.gh). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 30 Figure 3.1: A Map of Ghana Showing Districts and Communities in which Sericulture is practiced in Ghana University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 31 Semi-structured questionnaires were administered and also interviews and group discussions were held with farmers and Sericulture Associations in the various communities. At Pukrom, in the Akuapim – South District, only one sericulture farmer was interviewed. This is because only one farmer was into sericulture at the time of visit. In Odumase and Kwatre, the farmers were thirty (30) and they have five rearing houses. The Kpaliga Tree Growers Association which happens to be the sericulture group was also interviewed. It was observed that the farmers have one farm land and a rearing house. They cultivate mulberry and also do rearing together. 3.2 Field Experiments A field study was carried out from June, 2012 to February, 2013 to investigate the influence of three sources of fertilizer on the growth, leaf quality and regeneration of three varieties of mulberry under rain fed conditions at the University farm, Legon. The University farm is located in the coastal savannah zone of Ghana and situated at latitude 5039‟N and 0011‟W at an altitude of 97.24m above sea level. The soil of the experimental site belongs to the Adentan series and it is a savannah acrisol (FAO/UNESEO, 1999). The soil is dark-brown to reddish-brown sandy –clay loam and it is well drained and slightly sticky. The climatic data of the experimental area during the experiment is represented in table 3 below. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 32 Table 3: Mean monthly temperature (oC), rainfall (mm) and relative humidity (%) Month Temperature (oC) Minimum Maximum Rainfall (mm) Relative humidity (%) Minimum Maximum June 23.7 30.3 173.2 78 89 July 23.1 28.8 20.9 68 86 August 22.4 28.2 11.5 67 86 September 23.2 30.0 42.5 67 86 October 23.8 31.2 88.3 67 89 November December January February 24.6 24.9 25.5 25.4 32.4 32.6 33.4 33.7 14.0 41.9 34.0 0.0 63 66 88 66 88 91 90 93 Source: Ghana Meteorological Agency, Mempehuasem, Legon, 2012. Two field experiments were conducted in the farm. 3.2.1Experiment 1: Influence of nitrogen on the growth and leaf quality of three mulberry varieties A field experiment was carried out to investigate the influence of different inorganic fertilizers on growth, leaf quality and regeneration of mulberry varieties from June to December, 2012. 3.3Soil Sampling and Analysis Soil samples were collected from a depth of 0-45cm and mixed thoroughly to give a composite soil, air dried, powdered and sieved through a 2.0mm mesh sieve. This was done before planting. The soil sample was preserved in labeled polythene bag and later University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 33 analysed for various parameters such as pH, Cation Exchange Capacity, organic carbon and mineral composition such as N, P, K, Ca and Mg. 3.3.1 Soil pH Twenty grams (20g) of the composite soil sample was weighed into a 50ml beaker. An amount of 20ml distilled water was then added to make the ratio (1:1). The soil suspension was then stirred for 30 minutes. The suspension was allowed to stand for an hour to allow the entire suspended particles to settle. A glass electrode pH meter was standardized with two aqueous solutions of pH 4 and 7. The pH of the prepared suspension was measured by carefully and gently placing the glass electrode into the supernatant and the pH read. 3.3.2 Determination of soil total nitrogen Two (2) grams of air-dried soil sample was weighed into a 250mls Kjeldahl flask followed by addition of digestion accelerator, selenium catalyst and 5mls of concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4). The mixture was allowed to digest for at least two (2) hours until the digest became clear. It was allowed to cool and then transferred with distilled water into a 50 ml volumetric flask and made up to the volume. A 5 ml aliquot was pipetted from the digest into a distillation flask and 5 ml of 40% sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) was added with 100 ml distilled water. The sample was then distilled and collected in 5 ml of 2% boric acid to which about 2 drops of methylene blue indicator had been added. The distillate was then titrated against 0.01 N HCl (Bremner, 1965) from green to a reddish end point. The amount of N (%) was calculated using the formula: University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 34 3.3.4 Soil Phosphorus (P) Available phosphorus was determined from soil sample by Bray 1 method. The ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer was used to read the amount of P in the soil sample. Available phosphorus was determined by the formula below. P (g / Kg) Where, A is the spectrophotometer reading in gP B is the blank reading C is the total volume of extract ais the volume of aliquot b is the weight of soil sample 3.4 Determination of Exchangeable Bases in Soil Ten (10) grams of soil was weighed into an extraction bottle and 100ml of 1N ammonium acetate solution (NH4OAc) buffered at pH 7.0 was added. The bottle and its contents were placed on a mechanical shaker and shaken for an hour after which it was centrifuged for 20 minutes. The supernatant solution was then filtered through No.42 Whatman filter paper. The filtered solutions (aliquot) were used for the determination of Ca, Mg and K. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 35 3.4.1 Soil available Potassium (K) The flame photometer was used to determine the concentration of potassium in the aliquot. The amount of potassium present in the soil as shown in the formula below. K (Cmol/Kg) = Where, R is the flame photometer reading (ppm) 39.1 is the atomic weight of K2 3.4.2 Soil available Calcium (Ca) To a 10ml aliquot of the sample solution 10ml of 10% KOH and 1ml triethanolamine (TEA) were added. Three drops of 1M KCN solution and a few crystals of cal-red indicator were then added after which the mixture was titrated against 0.02N EDTA solution from red to blue end point. The titre value was used in the calculation of calcium as shown below. Ca (Cmol/Kg) = 3.4.3 Soil available Magnesium (Mg) To a 10ml aliquot of the sample solution, 5ml of ammonium chloride – ammonium hydroxide buffer solution was added followed by 1ml of triethanolamine. Three drops of 1M KCN solution and a few drops of Eriochrome black T solution were then added after which the mixture was titrated with 0.02N EDTA solution from red to blue end point. This end point titre value determines the amount of calcium and magnesium in the University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 36 solution. The titre value of magnesium was then determined by subtracting the value obtained for calcium above. This titre value of magnesium was then used for the calculation of the concentration of magnesium (Mg) as shown below. Mg (Cmol/ Kg) = 3.4.4 Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) Organic carbon was determined by the wet combustion method of Walkley and Black (1934). This method involves the reduction of the Cr2O7 2- ion by the organic matter and the unreduced Cr2O7 2- measured by titration with ammonium sulphate. The quantity of organic matter oxidized is calculated from the amount of Cr2O7 2- reduced. A 10ml of 1M potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) solution and 20ml of concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4) were added to 0.5g of soil in a conical flask and digested for 2 hours. The K2CrO7 remaining in solution after the digestion was titrated against 0.2M ferrous ammonium sulphate using barium diphenylamine sulphonate as the indicator to a green end point. The titre values were used to calculate the % C from the formula below: Where, X = titre value of ferrous ammonium sulphate N = normality of ferrous ammonium sulphate W = weight of soil. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 37 3.4.5 Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) Ten (10) gramme of soil sample was weighed into an extraction bottle and 100 mls of 1 M ammonium acetate solution added. The bottle with its content was shaken for 30 minutes on a mechanical shaker. The content was filtered through a No. 42 Whatman filter paper and the sample leached four times with 25 mls of methanol to wash off excess ammonium. Thereafter 25 mls of 1 M acidified potassium chloride was used to leach the soil four times. A 5 mL aliquot of the leachate was taken into a Markham distillation apparatus and 5 mls of 40% NaOH solution was added and distilled. The distillate was collected into 5 mls of 2% boric acid to which three drops of methyl red and methylene blue indicator were added. The distillate was back titrated against 0.01 M HCl to purplish end point. The cation exchange capacity in Cmolc/Kg soil was calculated from the number of moles of HCl consumed in the back titration. 3.5 Soil Physical Properties 3.5.1 Particle size analysis The particle size distribution was determined by the modified Bouyoucous hydrometer method described by Day (1965). Soils from 0 – 15 cm, 15 – 30 cm and 30 – 45 cm depth were analysed for clay, sand and silt content. Forty grams (40 g) of the 2 mm sieved soil was weighed into a beaker and 60 ml of 6% H2O2 was added to oxidize the organic matter. The content was transferred into a dispersion cup and mixed with 100 ml of 5% Calgon solution (Sodium hexametaphosphate). The suspension was shaken and transferred into a settling cylinder and was made up to the 1000 ml mark with distilled water. The suspension was agitated vigorously with a plunger and the time noted University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 38 immediately shaking was stopped. The temperature of the suspension was recorded after equilibration. The hydrometer was placed into the suspension and the first and second readings noted after 5 minutes and 5 hours, respectively. The suspension was then poured directly onto a 47 µm sieve and the particles retained on the sieve washed thoroughly with water and dried in an oven at 105 °C for 24 hours. The dried samples were weighed to represent the sand fraction. The particle size distribution was then determined using the following formulae: 3.5.2 Experimental materials The mulberry cuttings for planting were obtained from already established farms which were five (5) years old or more. The cuttings with 4-5 buds and 30-45cm long were used. The Mysore local and S-36 varieties were obtained from Pukrom near Nsawam in the Akuapim South District and the Kanva-2 variety was obtained from Kwatre near Sunyani in the Sunyani West District. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 39 The inorganic nitrogen fertilizers were obtained from Agricultural materials shop at Madina-Accra. The fertilizers consisted of Urea, Sulphate of ammonia and NPK (15:15:15). 3.5.3 Experimental treatments and field layout A factorial experiment involving three inorganic nitrogen sources and three mulberry varieties and a control was conducted in a split-plot design with three replicates. There were three replications with each replication having twelve (12) plots. The land area for the experiment was 747.96m2 (54.2m × 13.8m). The blocks were 1.5m apart and the plots were spaced 1.0m. Each block was divided into three main plots and each main plot was split into four sub-plots making 12 plots per replication. The size per plot was 3.6m × 3.6m (12.96m2) with plant spacing of 0.9m × 0.9m. The treatments tested were as follows: Main plots – Varieties V1, (Kanva-2) V 2, (S-36) V 3, (Mysore Local) Sub-plots – Nitrogen sources Control (N0) Urea: 100 kg N/ ha (N1) Sulphate of ammonia: 250kg N/ha (N2) NPK (15:15:15): 300kg N/ha (N3). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 40 3.6 Cultivation Practices The cuttings were obtained from existing farms which were five and more years old. The length of the cuttings were 30-45cm with about 4-5 buds. A spacing of 0.9m × 0.9m was adopted. Each plot had twenty five (25) plants per plot. The planting was done in June, 2012 which was the mid of the major rainy season in coastal Ghana. Weeds were controlled by hoeing as and when necessary. The incidence of pests such as termites was controlled using Hercules insecticide. This was applied at a rate of 50mls per 15Litres of water into the planting holes before planting. The incidence of mealybugs in the dry season was controlled using Cydim super (cypermethrin and dimethoate) at a rate of 35mls in 15L of water. Supplementary water was applied using watering cans during periods of low soil moisture. 3.6.1 Fertilizer application Three different sources of inorganic nitrogen (fertilizer) were applied in the form of urea, sulphate of ammonia and NPK 15:15:15. The fertilizer was applied at 8 and ten (10) weeks after planting in two equal splits using the ring method. The fertilizer was applied at rate of 100kg N/ha, 250kg N/ha and 300kg N/ha in the form of urea, Sulphate of ammonia and NPK (15:15:15). 3.7 Data Collection Different growth parameters such as plant height, number of leaves per plant, stem diameter, number of branches per plant and leaf area were recorded. Other parameters taken included fresh and dry weight of leaves, fresh and dry weight of stems. The University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 41 moisture and protein content of leaves at harvest was determined and the N, P, K, Ca and Mg content of the leaves and stems were determined. The growth parameters were taken at two weeks interval after first fertilizer application and fresh and dry weight of leaves were taken at 24 weeks of growth at the end of the first experiment. The height of plant in centimetres was measured from the base of the plant to the base of the fully opened leaves. The height of five randomly selected plants was measured using the meter rule and tape measure and the average values were recorded. The number of leaves per plant of five randomly selected plants per treatment was counted and the average values recorded. The diameter of five record plants per treatment was measured at 15cm from the base and recorded in millimetres (mm) and the average calculated and recorded. The diameter of new shoots was also recorded using venier calipers. The number of branches per plant was recorded from each record plant in a plot and the mean number of branches calculated as follows Number of branches per plant = total number of branches Number of plants 3.7.1 Dry matter yield Two plants from each plot at random were selected. The plants were cut at 30cm above ground. The shoot was separated into leaves and stems and the fresh weight recorded. The samples were chopped into pieces and oven dried at 70 0 C for 72 hours to constant weight. The dry weight of leaves and stems were recorded and calculated in gram per plant. The weights were then computed in kilogram per plant. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 42 3.8 Experiment 2: Regeneration of Mulberry Plants The experiment two investigated the influence of different sources of inorganic nitrogen on the growth and leaf quality of regenerated mulberry after bottom pruning. The six (6) months old plants were bottom pruned at a height of 30cm above ground with a sharp cutlass in December, 2012. The plants were allowed to regrow from January – February, 2013 which was in the middle of the dry season in coastal Ghana. Three different inorganic fertilizers were applied in two equal dose to the pruned mulberry plants at a rate of 100kg N/ha, 250kg N/ha and 300kg N/ha in the form of urea, Sulphate of ammonia and NPK (15:15:15). The data collected on growth parameters were number of sprouts per plant, number of leaves, plant height, stem diameter and leaf area at two weeks interval after fertilizer application. Other parameters measured were fresh and dry weight of leaves and fresh and dry weight of stems. The moisture and protein content of leaves at harvest was determined and the N, P, K, Ca and Mg content of the leaves and stems were determined. Nutrients uptake by the crop was also determined by multiplying the dry weight of the plant parts by the nutrients concentration of the respective plant parts. 3.9 Plant Analysis The parameters measured for leaf quality are moisture content (%), % crude protein, minerals and total sugars. The nutrient composition of the leaves and stems were also determined. The nutrients determined were; Nitrogen (%), phosphorus (%), potassium (%), magnesium (%) and calcium (%) at the end of each experiment. For the determination of N, P, K, Ca and Mg, the plant samples (leaves and stems) were University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 43 grounded into powder using a Willy type cutting mill, DIK-2900 (Daiki Rika Kogyo Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and passed through a 0.5mm sieve. 3.9.1 Moisture content (%) Leaves were harvested from each treatment and preserved in polythene bags of which the fresh weight was taken. The leaves were oven dried at 700C for 48hrs and the dry weight recorded. The moisture content of the fresh leaves was computed as % moisture = fresh leaf weight (g) ˗ dry leaf weight (g) dry leaf weight (g) × 100 3.9.2 Digestion of plant sample 0.1g of milled, oven-dried plant sample was weighed into a khedjal flask. Fifty (50) ml of concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4) was added and the sample digested till it became clear on addition of drops of hydrogen peroxide 2 2H O . The solution was then allowed to cool. The mixture was filtered into a 100mls volumetric flask and topped with distilled water to the mark. The determination of N, P, K, Ca and Mg was done by measuring specific volumes of the aliquot. 3.9.3 Total Nitrogen The total nitrogen was estimated by Khedjal method (Jackson, 1973). Percent nitrogen was calculated as shown below: % N = University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 44 Where, 0.014 = milliequivalent of nitrogen 3.9.4 Plant total Phosphorus (P) The P content in the extract was read using the ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 719 and calculated as below; Total P (%) = 1000000aliquot x x sample ofweight x100 volumeextraction x readingmeter 3.9.5 Plant Potassium (K) The K was determined using the flame photometer. The K was then calculated using the formula: sample in the (%)K 1000 x x w1000 100 x f x V xb)-(a Where a = concentration of potassium in the digest; b = concentration of flask of the blank digest; w = the weight of sample; v = volume of the digest solution and f = dilution factor 3.9.6 Calcium and Magnesium Ca and Mg in the extract were determined using the Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS). The concentration of calcium and magnesium in the plant sample expressed in percentage was calculated as follows: University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 45 3.9.7 Leaf crude protein The crude protein was calculated from the %N in leaf using the formula (%) Crude protein = % N (leaf) × 6.25. 3.10 Statistical Analysis Data obtained were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Genstat (version 9.0) and descriptive statistics. Means were separated using L.S.D at p= 0.05. Graphs were drawn using Microsoft Excel 2010. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 46 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 4.0 Status of Sericulture in Ghana 4.1 Demographic Characteristics of Sericulture Farmers About 62.5% of the sericulture farmers were within the age group of 40-49 years old (Table 4.1). Table 4.1: Age of respondents in a sericulture farmer survey Age of respondent Frequency Percentage (%) 30-39 1 6.25 40-49 10 62.5 50-59 2 12.5 60-69 1 6.25 70-79 2 12.5 About 52.9% and 23.5% of the sericulture farmers were Junior High School and Senior High School graduates, respectively (Fig. 4.1). Only 5.9% of the farmers had no formal education. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 47 Figure 4.1: Level of Education of Respondents in a sericulture farmer survey Figure 4.2 shows the household size of the sericulture farmers. The household size of 1-5 persons per family and 6-10 persons per family were 44% each. Figure 4.2: Household Size of Respondents University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 48 It was observed that sericulture was practiced in the Eastern, Western, Ashanti, Central, Volta, Brong-Ahafo and Northern Regions. However, in the process of identification, it was revealed that most farmers have abandoned mulberry cultivation. On the distribution of sericulture farmers, the results showed that 88.2%, 5.9% and 5.9% of them were found in Brong-Ahafo, Eastern and Northern Regions, respectively. The total farm land for the respondents in all the regions is 132.6 hectares of which 56 hectares are used for mulberry cultivation. Table 4.2 shows the land distribution of the respondents in the regions and the land area cultivated to mulberry. Table 4. 2: Total land area and area cultivated to mulberry Region Total farm land (ha) Land area cultivated to mulberry (ha) B/A 119.8 43.2 E/R 12 12 N/R 0.8 0.8 About 21% of the total land available to sericulture farmers in Ghana was used for mulberry cultivation. Figure 4.3: Total land area cultivated to mulberry and other crops in Ghana University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 49 4.2 Production and Marketing of Mulberry Grown in Ghana The common mulberry varieties grown in Ghana are Kanva-2, S-36 and Mysore local. About 83.3% of the farmers grew Kanva-2, 5.6% grew Mysore local whiles 11.1% grew S-36 and Mysore local (Table 4.3). The Kanva-2 is widely grown in the Brong-Ahafo Region. Table 4.3: Varieties of mulberry grown in Ghana Region Mulberry variety cultivated Frequency Percentage (%) B/A Kanva-2 15 83.3 E/R S-36, Mysore local 2 11.1 N/R Mysore local 1 5.6 Out of the seventeen (17) respondents who cultivated mulberry, 8 said the variety they grew was the one available to them and 5 said it was high yielding. Three said it was the only variety they knew whiles 1 person said it was well adapted to the local climate. Figure 4.5 represents the frequencies and reasons why farmers grew particular mulberry varieties. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 50 Figure 4.4: Reasons why farmers grow particular mulberry varieties Figure 4.5 below shows that lack of markets for cocoon, price discrimination and fluctuation, Lack of knowledge of farmers on the existence of market outside Ghana for cocoons and lack of reeling centres accounted for 59%, 22%, 15% and 4% of the constraints. Figure 4. 5: Challenges in marketing of Cocoons University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 51 4.3 Rearing of Silkworm egg in Ghana Silkworm egg imported into the country was from India, Sericulture Promotion and Development Association (SPDA) Ghana, Kenya and Belgium in the percentages of 38%, 33%, 24% and 5% respectively. Figure 4.6: Sources of Silkworm egg supply to Ghana The race of silkworm reared in Ghana is the Bivoltine. 29.4% reared the bivoltine because it was the race available, 23.53% reared the race because it spins good quality cocoons, 11.76% reared bivoltine because it was commercially viable. Also, 5.88% of the sericulture farmers in Ghana reared the bivoltine because it was recommended to them by SPDA because it was adapted to the climatic conditions of the country (Figure 4.7). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 52 Figure 4.7: Reasons for rearing Bivoltine Silkworm race 4.4 Sericulture Training Programmes It was observed that 71% of the farmers did not attend training programme in sericulture whiles 29% of the farmers attended training programmes in sericulture. 4.5 Sources of Finance and Profitability of Mulberry Only 17.6% of the sericulture farmers interviewed had access to credit. In general, majority of the farmers indicated that the sericulture business was profitable (Table 4.4). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 53 Table 4. 4: Profitability of Sericulture Item Frequency Percentage Not profitable 1 5.9 Profitable 12 70.6 Very profitable 1 5.9 Not very profitable 3 17.6 4.6 Field Experiment 1: 4.6.1 Soil physical and chemical properties The result of the initial soil analysis showed that the soil used for the cultivation was acidic, had low organic matter content and was low in nutrients especially nitrogen (N) and K (Table 4.5). The soil was sandy (59.7%) which meant that water retention was low and nutrient leaching was high. Table 4. 5: Soil Physical and chemical properties % Sand % Silt % Clay pH(1:1 H2O) OC N P K Na Ca Mg CEC 59.7 16.04 24.2 4.51 0.46 0.085 13.94 0.544 1.202 3.22 2.5 34.731 Plant height The influence of inorganic N sources on plant height of mulberry is shown in Figs 4.8a- d. Plant height was significantly increased (p< 0.05) by urea followed by SoA. NPK recorded lower heights than the other sources. S-36 and Mysore local produced significantly (P< 0.05) taller plants compared to Kanva-2 in the urea and SoA treated University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 54 plots (Figs. 4.8a & b). However, Mysore local was significantly shorter than S-36 and Kanva-2 in the NPK treated plants (Fig. 4.8c). Plants were significantly taller in Kanva-2 by Mysore local in the control. On the other hand, S-36 recorded significantly lower heights in the control plots compared to the other varieties (Fig. 4.8d). Figure 4. 8a: Influence of Urea on plant height (cm) University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 55 Figure 4.8b: Influence of SoA on plant height (cm) Figure 4.8c: Influence of NPK on plant height (cm) University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 56 Figure 4.8d: The height of control plants (cm) Number of leaves per plant Significant increase (P< 0.05) in number of leaves was observed among the nitrogen sources. Nitrogen significantly increased the number of leaves in Mysore local more than S-36. The lowest number of leaves was produced by Kanva-2 in the N treated plots (Figures 4.9a-c). However, more leaves were produced by Kanva-2 in the control plots compared to the other varieties. On the average, application of urea resulted in the production of more leaves than SoA and NPK. NPK treated mulberry produced the lowest number of leaves among the N sources. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 57 Figure 4.9 a: Influence of Urea on number of leaves (cm) Figure 4.9 b: Influence of SoA on number of leaves University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 58 Figure 4.9 c: Influence of NPK on number of leaves Figure 4.9 d: Number of leaves per plant in the control University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 59 Stem diameter Figures 4.10a-d shows the stem diameter of mulberry as affected by the N sources. No significant difference was observed among the N sources with reference to stem diameter. However, SoA treated plants had the largest stem diameter. Among the mulberry varieties, Mysore local was observed to have the highest stem diameter in urea, NPK and control plots. S-36 had the highest stem diameter in SoA treated plants. No significant interaction was recorded. Figure 4.10 a: Influence of Urea on stem diameter University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 60 Figure 4.10 b: Influence of SoA on stem diameter Figure 4.10 c: Influence of NPK on stem diameter University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 61 Figure 4.10 d: Stem diameter of control mulberry plants Number of branches per plant Table 4.6 shows the influence of inorganic N on the number of branches per plant at 21 WAP 1. No significant (P< 0.05) difference was recorded among the varieties, N sources and the interactions. However, the maximum number of branches (7.0) was produced by plants that were fertilized with NPK compared to the control (6.0). Similarly, no significant difference occurred among the varieties in the number of branches noticed. However, the highest number of branches (9.0) was produced by Mysore local. S-36 and Kanva-2 produced similar number of branches (Table 4.6). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 62 Table 4.6: Influence of inorganic N on number of branches per plant at 21 WAP 1 Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 5.0 5.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 S-36 5.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 Mysore local 9.0 9.0 9.0 10.0 9.0 Mean 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 LSD (0.05): V= NS; V= NS; V x N= NS. Leaf fresh weight (g) Leaf fresh weight was significantly (P< 0.05) increased with the application of N. In table 4.7 significant differences exists between leaf fresh weight of plants that received SoA and urea. Urea, SoA and NPK increased leaf fresh weight by 6.4%, 8.3% and 8.1%, respectively more than the control. Similarly, S-36 produced higher leaf fresh weight than Kanva-2 and Mysore local. Also, no significant interaction was recorded between the varieties and the N sources. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 63 Table 4.7: Influence of inorganic N on leaf fresh weight at 21 WAP 1 Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 125.6 178.4 192.2 183.1 169.8 S-36 135.8 169.1 198.1 188.7 172.9 Mysore local 128.8 171.1 167.1 183.1 162.5 Mean 130.1 172.9 185.8 185.0 Lsd (0.05): V= 11.9; N= 10.8; V x N= 18.2. Leaf dry weight (g) The production and partitioning of dry matter to plant parts was significantly (P< 0.05) influenced by the application of different sources of inorganic nitrogen. The highest leaf dry weight (69.4g) was obtained in NPK treated plots and the lowest dry weight (49.4g) was produced in control plots (Table 4.8). There was no varietal difference in terms of leaf dry weight, however, the highest leaf dry weight (66.2g) was produced by Mysore local. Significant interaction was noticed. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 64 Table 4.8: Influence of inorganic nitrogen and mulberry variety on mulberry leaf dry weight (g/plant) Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 47.7 69.5 66.6 64.0 61.9 S-36 49.5 58.3 53.3 73.4 58.6 Mysore local 50.9 68.5 74.3 70.8 66.2 Mean 49.4 65.4 64.8 69.4 LSD (0.05): V= NS; N= 4.526; V x N= 9.897 Leaf fresh yield (kg/ha) Significant (P< 0.05) increase in fresh leaf yield was observed due to the application of the different N sources. SoA and NPK application resulted in higher leaf yield. However, SoA and NPK did not produce significant increase. Although varietal effect was non- significant, S-36 produced significantly (P< 0.05) higher yield (2135kg/ha) compared to Kanva-2 (2097kg/ha) and Mysore local (2007kg/ha) (Table 4.9). Also, the application of SoA to S-36 produced higher leaf fresh yield compared to other N sources. N treated plants performed better than the control. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 65 Table 4.9: Nitrogen influence on fresh leaf yield (kg/ha) of mulberry Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 1550 2203 2373 2261 2097 S-36 1677 2088 2446 2330 2135 Mysore local 1677 2112 2063 2260 2007 Mean 1606 2135 2294 2284 Lsd (0.05): V= 146.6; N= 132.7; V x N= 225.2. Leaf dry yield (kg/ha) Inorganic N produced significant increase (P< 0.05) in dry leaf yield at 21 WAP 1 (Table 4.10). NPK had the highest dry leaf yield and this was followed by urea. SoA and urea did not produce any significant effect. The N treated plants had higher leaf yield than the control. No significant varietal influence was observed. However, Mysore local recorded the highest (817.3kg/ha) leaf dry yield (Table 4.10). There was significant interaction among between nitrogen and mulberry varieties. Table 4.10: Influence of Nitrogen on dry leaf yield (kg/ha) of mulberry Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 589.3 858.5 823.1 790.6 765.3 S-36 611.3 720.4 658.9 906.4 724.2 Mysore local 629.2 846.5 918.3 875.1 817.3 Mean 610.0 808.5 800.1 857.4 LSD (0.05): V= 111.3; N= 55.88; V x N= 122.19. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 66 Stem fresh weight (g) Table 4.11 shows that stem fresh weight was significantly (P< 0.05) influenced by N sources at 21 WAP 1 more than the control. The effect urea was significantly different from NPK. No Significant variety and interaction was recorded at 21 WAP 1. However, the highest stem fresh weight (186.4g) was produced by S-36. Table 4. 11: Influence of inorganic N on stem fresh weight of mulberry Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 98.9 173.8 169.7 160.4 150.7 S-36 119.8 217.7 186.0 222.3 186.4 Mysore local 103.0 232.1 230.6 159.4 181.3 Mean 107.2 207.9 195.4 180.7 Lsd (0.05): V= 37.5; N= 27.08; V x N= 49.3. Stem dry weight (g) Significant (P< 0.05) impact of N sources on stem dry weight was observed. Urea recorded the highest (83.7g/plant) stem dry weight. Table 4.12 shows no significant difference between stem dry weight of plants fertilized with urea and SoA and also between SoA and NPK. The N treated plants had greater stem dry weights than the control. No significant variety and nitrogen source interaction was observed. However, Mysore local produced significantly (P< 0.05) higher dry weight (82.9g/plant) than Kanva-2 (61.1g/plant) and S-36 (71.3g/plant). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 67 Table 4. 12: Influence of N sources on stem dry weight (g) of mulberry Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 44.1 70.5 66.1 63.9 61.1 S-36 59.4 78.1 67.7 80.0 71.3 Mysore local 62.2 102.6 103.5 63.0 82.9 Mean 55.2 83.7 79.1 69.0 LSD (0.05): V= 28.4; N= 12.9; V x N= 30.1. Total Shoot Yield (kg/ha) Total shoot yield which comprising of leaves and stems was significantly influenced by the N sources. The N sources significantly (P< 0.05) increased the total shoot yield of the varieties more than the control (Table 4.13). NPK treated plots recorded the lowest shoot yield (1713kg/ha) among the N sources. Mysore local had significantly larger shoot yield (1993kg/ha) than Kanva-2 and S-36. Significant interaction was observed between nitrogen source and varieties of mulberry. Table 4.13: Influence of inorganic N sources on total shoot yield at 21 WAP 1 Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 1190 1717 1875 1580 1590 S-36 1243 1725 1495 1893 1589 Mysore local 1397 2312 2599 1665 1993 Mean 1277 1918 1990 1713 LSD (0.05): V= 172.6; N= 164.7; V x N= 276.0. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 68 Fresh stem yield (kg/ha) Table 4.14 shows significant increase in fresh stem yield due to application of N sources. Urea treated plants recorded the highest stem yield (2566kg/ha) followed by SoA (2413kg/ha) treated plants. The application of urea and SoA to Mysore local produced higher fresh stem yield than the application of NPK to Mysore local. Control plots recorded the lowest yield. Table 4.14: Influence of N sources on fresh stem yield (kg/ha) of mulberry varieties Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 1221 2146 2096 1981 1861 S-36 1479 2688 2296 2744 2302 Mysore local 1272 2865 2847 1968 2238 Mean 1324 2566 2413 2231 Lsd (0.05): V= 463.2; N= 334.4; V x N= 609.1 Dry stem yield (kg/ha) There was significant (P< 0.05) increase in dry stem yield with the application of inorganic N (Table 4.15). SoA produced the highest yield followed by Urea. There was a significant difference between SoA and NPK in dry stem productivity. The lowest yield was observed in control plots. Influence of variety was non-significant. However, Mysore local yielded better than Kanva-2 and S-36. Significant interaction was observed between varieties and nitrogen sources. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 69 Table 4.15: Influence of N sources on stem dry yield (kg/ha) of mulberry Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 524 858 865 789 759 S-36 631 876 836 987 833 Mysore local 768 1267 1454 778 1067 Mean 641 1001 1052 851 Lsd (0.05): V= 306.7; N= 168.0; V x N= 348.6 4.6.2 Leaf quality parameters Leaf moisture (%) The leaf moisture content was significantly (P< 0.05) increased due to application of Nitrogen. The highest moisture content of fresh leaves was obtained with the application of SoA (85.5%) followed by NPK (85%) and urea (72.9%). Varieties effect on leaf moisture content was non-significant. However, S-36 recorded the highest (73%) leaf moisture content. Table 4.16: Influence of N source and Variety on fresh leaf moisture (%) Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 25.6 78.4 92.2 83.1 69.8 S-36 35.8 69.2 98.1 88.7 73.0 Mysore local 28.8 71.1 67.1 83.1 62.5 Mean 30.1 72.9 85.8 85.0 LSD (0.05): V= 11.9; N= 10.8; V x N= 18.2 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 70 Crude Protein (%) Application of Nitrogen from different sources significantly (P< 0.05) increased the crude protein of mulberry leaf. SoA and NPK greatly improved the protein content (36.58% and 35.43%) of mulberry leaves (Table 4.17) more than urea. No significant (P< 0.05) difference was obtained among the varieties. However, S-36 recorded the highest leaf protein (34.87%). The application of SoA to S-36 produced the highest leaf moisture (39.0%) content. Table 4.17: Leaf Crude protein (%) of fresh leaf Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 31.3 32.4 35.0 33.8 33.1 S-36 32.5 32.9 39.0 35.3 34.9 Mysore local 32.6 33.2 35.7 37.1 34.7 Mean 32.1 32.8 36.6 35.4 LSD (0.05): V= 1.5; N= 0.8; V x N= 1.7 Leaf mineral content (%) The mean leaf mineral content of N treated plots was significantly higher (P< 0.05) than the control plots. The highest mineral content (6.602%) was achieved due to NPK application. There was significant interaction between varieties and N sources (Table 4.18). The highest (7.328%) interaction effect was produced by NPK and Mysore local interaction. The highest mineral (6.669%) composition was measured in Mysore local. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 71 Table 4.18: Influence of inorganic N on leaf mineral (%) composition Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 6.225 5.895 6.561 5.815 6.124 S-36 5.852 6.899 6.943 6.662 6.589 Mysore local 6.535 6.951 5.861 7.328 6.669 Mean 6.204 6.582 6.455 6.602 LSD (0.05): V= 0.0860; N= 0.1435; V x N= 0.2229. Nitrogen uptake into leaf Uptake of N into leaf was significantly (P< 0.05) enhanced by the application of N sources. The uptake of N into leaf increased with the application NPK followed by urea (Table 4.19). Nitrogen uptake as a result of application of SoA and urea were not significantly different from each other. There was no significant varietal effect but interaction between variety and nitrogen source was significant. Mysore local recorded the highest N uptake when NPK was applied. This was the same for S-36. Table 4.19: Influence of N sources on N uptake into leaf Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 245.2 352.1 339.3 344.1 320.2 S-36 251.9 301.9 301.0 438.6 323.3 Mysore local 294.3 437.0 399.2 492.5 405.7 Mean 263.8 363.7 346.5 425.1 LSD (0.05): V= 70.0; N= 28.9; V x N= 72.5. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 72 4.7 Field Experiment 2: 4.7.1 Influence of inorganic nitrogen on regeneration, growth and leaf quality of mulberry varieties after pruning Number of sprouts per plant The number of sprouts after pruning was significantly (P< 0.05) influenced by the application of inorganic N sources. There was significant difference among the varieties with reference to the number of sprouts after pruning (Figure 4.11). S-36 had the highest number of sprouts followed by Kanva-2. The number of sprouts in Mysore local decreased at week 6 after pruning. Figure 4.11: Influence of inorganic N on number of sprouts per plant after pruning Plant height (cm) Plant height of mulberry as influenced by N sources is indicated in (Figures 4.12a-d). Significant influence of inorganic N sources was observed. Mysore local had the highest University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 73 plant height. S-36 had the highest plant height in the control. Among the N sources, NPK had taller plants as compared to the other N sources. Figure 4.12 a: Influence of Urea on plant height after pruning Figure 4.12 b: Influence of SoA on plant height after pruning University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 74 Figure 4.12 c: Influence of NPK on plant height after pruning Figure 4.12 d: Height of control plants after pruning University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 75 Number of leaves The number of leaves increased significantly (P< 0.05) at application of inorganic N. The number of leaves of Mysore local was significantly more than any of the varieties in the treated plots. However, S-36 had more leaves in the control than Mysore local. The increase in number of leaves was in the order of NPK > Urea > SoA. The control plots had the lowest number of leaves in all the varieties. Figure 4.13 a: Influence of Urea on number of leaves per plant after pruning University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 76 Figure 4.13 b: Influence of SoA on number of leaves per plant after pruning Figure 4.13 c: Influence of NPK on number of leaves per plant in experiment 2 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 77 Figure 4.13 d: Number of leaves per plant in the control treatment Stem diameter The stem diameter per plant was significantly influenced by the application of inorganic N sources (Figures 4.14a-d). The application of urea and NPK increased the stem diameter of Mysore local more than the other varieties. SoA on the other hand, increased the stem diameter of S-36 more than Kanva-2 and Mysore local. The control favoured Kanva-2 in terms of diameter growth. The influence of NPK and SoA on stem diameter was non-significant. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 78 Figure 4.14 a: Influence of Urea on stem diameter after pruning Figure 4.14 b: Influence of SoA on stem diameter after pruning University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 79 Figure 4.14 c: Influence of NPK on stem diameter after pruning Figure 4.14 d: Influence of Control on stem diameter after pruning University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 80 Leaf fresh weight (g) N sources had significant (P< 0.05) effect on fresh leaf weight. The highest leaf fresh weight (457.1 g/plant) was produced in NPK treated plots followed by Urea (401.1g/plant) and SoA (335.3g/plant). The control produced the lowest leaf fresh weight. Significant difference was observed among the N sources (Table 4.20). There was no varietal effect on leaf fresh weight. However, S-36 recorded higher leaf yield than Kanva-2 and Mysore local. There was significant interaction between variety and nitrogen source. Table 4.20: Influence of nitrogen on leaf fresh weight (g) at 8 weeks after pruning Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 219.8 361.4 353.5 394.3 332.2 S-36 269.3 468.1 355.2 484.7 394.3 Mysore local 229.2 373.8 297.4 492.2 348.1 Mean 219.0 401.1 335.3 457.1 LSD (0.05): V= 50.2; N= 36.7; V x N = 66.5. Leaf dry weight (g/plant) Leaf dry weight was significantly (P< 0.05) influenced by inorganic N sources. Differences among N sources were significant (Table 4.21). Urea treated plants produced significantly higher leaf dry weight (123.2g/plant) than NPK (108.4g/plant) and SoA (106.0g/plant). No significant difference was observed between plants that were fertilized University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 81 with SoA and NPK. Also, no significant varietal influence was observed. However, S-36 produced higher leaf weight than Kanva-2 and Mysore (Table 4.21). There was no significant interaction between the varieties and N sources. Table 4.21: Influence of nitrogen source on leaf dry weight (g) of mulberry at 8 weeks after pruning Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 67.3 99.8 95.5 98.4 90.3 S-36 76.9 144.3 135.9 138.0 123.8 Mysore local 69.1 125.4 86.5 88.8 92.5 Mean 71.1 123.2 106.0 108.4 LSD (0.05): V= 31.0; N= 17.1; V x N = 35.4. Fresh leaf weight (kg/ha) There was significant (P< 0.05) impact of N sources on fresh leaf yield of mulberry varieties. There was also significant difference among N sources with respect to leaf fresh weight (Table 4.22). The highest fresh leaf weight (2821kg/ha) was obtained in NPK treated plants and the least(1478kg/ha) in the control plants. No significant varietal influence was recorded. However, S-36 performed better than Kanva-2 and Mysore local. Significant interaction was observed among varieties and nitrogen sources. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 82 Table 4.22: Influence of N sources on leaf fresh weight (kg/ha) Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 1357 2231 2182 2434 2051 S-36 1663 2890 2192 2992 2434 Mysore local 1415 2307 1836 3039 2149 Mean 1478 2476 2070 2821 LSD (0.05): V= 310.0; N= 226.4; V x N= 410.6 Dry leaf weight (kg/ha) The leaf dry weight of mulberry was significantly (P< 0.05) influenced by N sources applied. Urea application significantly increased leaf dry weight of mulberry varieties more than SoA and NPK. NPK and urea treated plots were non-significant. Variety had no significant impact on leaf dry weight. However, S-36 yielded (764kg/ha) more than Kanva-2 (557kg/ha) and Mysore local (571kg/ha). Similarly, interaction effect was non- significant but the highest interaction effect (891kg/ha) was between S-36 and urea (Table 4.23). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 83 Table 4.2314: Effect of N sources on leaf dry yield of mulberry Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 416 616 590 607 557 S-36 474 891 839 852 764 Mysore local 427 774 534 548 571 Mean 439 760 654 669 Lsd (0.05): V= 191.4; N= 105.8; V x N= 218.4. Stem fresh weight (g/plant) The stem fresh weight of mulberry varieties after pruning was significantly (P< 0.05) influenced by the application of inorganic sources of N. Table 4.31 shows significant differences among the N sources. Stem fresh weight as a result of NPK and urea application were significantly different from each other. However, NPK and urea increased stem fresh weight by 18.3% and 11.8%, respectively more than the control (Table 4.24). Mysore local had higher stem fresh weight (284g/plant) than Kanva-2 (204g/plant) and S-36 (264g/plant). Mysore local and S-36 were not significantly different from each other. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 84 Table 4.25: Influence of inorganic N on stem fresh weight (g) at 8 weeks after pruning Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 131 233 222 230 204 S-36 175 261 263 357 264 Mysore local 158 324 226 428 284 Mean 154 273 237 338 LSD (0.05): V= 61.5; N= 72.6; V x N= 116.9. Stem dry weight (g/plant) Table 4.26 indicates N sources significantly (P< 0.05) influenced the stem dry weight of mulberry. Significant difference was observed between the application of NPK and SoA. The highest stem dry weight (121.5g/plant) was recorded at the application of NPK followed by urea (101.8g/plant). Table 4.32 shows Mysore local had significantly (P< 0.05) higher stem dry weight followed by S-36. However, no significant difference was observed between Mysore local and S-36. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 85 Table 4.26: Influence of inorganic N on stem dry weight Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 47.5 85.0 78.1 79.3 72.4 S-36 62.0 103.0 88.9 127.8 95.4 Mysore local 64.0 117.3 88.8 157.3 106.9 Mean 57.8 101.8 85.3 121.5 LSD (0.05): V = 15.3; N= 24.9; V x N= 38.7. Stem fresh weight (kg/ha) N sources significantly (P< 0.05) impacted stem fresh weight of mulberry varieties. Table 4.33 indicates significant difference among varieties and N sources. The highest stem fresh yield (2089kg/ha) was obtained in NPK treated plots and the lowest (953kg/ha) in the control plots (Table 4.27). Stem fresh yield was highest (1754kh/ha) in Mysore local than the other varieties. Stem fresh weight of S-36 and Mysore local were not significantly different from each other. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 86 Table 4.27: Influence of N sources on stem fresh weight (kg/ha) at 8 weeks after pruning Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 807 1439 1371 1421 1259 S-36 1078 1608 1621 2201 1627 Mysore local 974 2002 1396 2644 1754 Mean 953 1683 1463 2089 LSD (P0.05): V= 379.5; N= 448.0; V x N= 721.6 Stem dry weight (kg/ha) The difference in stem dry weight of mulberry was significantly different (P< 0.05) among N sources. The lowest stem dry weight (357kg/ha) was produced in control plots. NPK and urea increased stem dry yield more than SoA. NPK and urea were not significantly different from each other. In the same way, Mysore local yielded significantly better than Kanva-2 and S-36. However, S-36 and Mysore local had no significant difference (Table 4.28). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 87 Table 4.28: Influence of N sources on stem dry weight of mulberry varieties (kg/ha) at 8 weeks after pruning Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 292 525 482 490 447 S-36 383 636 549 789 589 Mysore local 395 724 548 971 660 Mean 357 628 526 750 LSD (0.05): V= 94.2; N= 153.6; V x N= 238.9. Total shoot yield (kg/ha) The total shoot yield (leaves and stems) was significantly (P< 0.05) influenced by N sources. The N treated plants had significantly higher shoot yield than the control. Urea and NPK treated plots were not significantly different from each other. No significant difference was observed between S-36 and Mysore local. However, Kanva-2 had significantly lower shoot yield (1004kg/ha) across N sources compared to S-36 (1353kg/ha) and Mysore local (1231kg/ha) (Table 4.29). University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 88 Table 4.29: Influence of N sources on total shoot yield (kg/ha) after pruning Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 708 1141 1072 1097 1004 S-36 857 1526 1387 1641 1353 Mysore local 822 1499 1083 1519 1231 Mean 796 1389 1181 1419 LSD (P< 0.05): V= 197.9; N= 213.8; V x N= 349.4. 4.7.2 Leaf quality parameters Leaf moisture content (%) Table 4.30 shows the mean values for moisture content of fresh leaves. There was significant (P< 0.05) influence of inorganic N sources on leaf moisture content. The highest leaf moisture (76.2%) was obtained in NPK treated plots and the least (69.33%) obtained from urea treated plots. However, no significant difference in leaf moisture content existed between urea and SoA. Influence of variety on moisture content of leaves was not significant. However, Kanva-2 recorded the highest moisture content (72.4%). The application of NPK to Mysore local produced the highest (81.95%) leaf moisture content. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 89 Table 4.30: Influence of N sources on leaf moisture content of mulberry varieties Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 69.4 72.4 73.0 75.1 72.4 S-36 71.0 69.2 61.8 71.5 68.4 Mysore local 68.8 66.4 71.0 82.0 72.0 Mean 69.7 69.3 68.5 76.2 LSD (0.05): V= 3.6; N= 4.4; V x N = 7.0 Crude protein (%) The protein content of the leaves was positively influenced by the application of inorganic N. Application of urea recorded significantly (P< 0.05) higher (34.6%) protein content than NPK (28.1%) and SoA (27.2%). No significant difference was observed between Urea and SoA. No significant varietal effect was observed. However, S-36 had the highest protein (26.8%) followed by Mysore local (26.3) (Tale 4.31). Table 4.31: Influence of N on leaf protein content (%) Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 14.6 35.1 26.3 27.7 25.9 S-36 16.3 34.4 27.1 29.2 26.8 Mysore local 15.2 34.4 28.3 27.4 26.3 Mean 15.4 34.6 27.2 28.1 LSD (0.05): V= 3.5; N= 2.3; V x N= 4.4. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 90 Leaf mineral content (%) Significant (P< 0.05) influence of inorganic N sources on the mineral content of mulberry leaf was observed. The highest mineral content (9.2%) was recorded by the application of urea followed by NPK and the lowest was recorded in the control. No significant difference was observed between urea and NPK (Table 4.32). Mysore local recorded the highest mineral content and the lowest by Kanva-2. No significant difference existed between S-36 and Mysore local. Table 4.32: Influence of inorganic N sources on mineral composition of mulberry leaf Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 5.7 8.6 8.2 8.7 7.8 S-36 5.8 9.6 8.6 9.1 8.3 Mysore local 6.1 9.4 8.9 9.7 8.5 Mean 5.9 9.2 8.5 9.2 LSD (0.05): V= 0.3376; N= 0.3485; V x N= NS Nitrogen uptake into leaf (g/plant) N sources significantly (P< 0.05) influenced the uptake of N into the leaf. There was significant increase in the uptake of N into the leaf in the N treated plots compared to the control. Urea, SoA and NPK increased the uptake of N into leaf by 27.9%, 16% and 17.3% folds, respectively compared to the control. There was no significant difference between SoA and NPK in N uptake. S-36 had higher leaf N than Kanva-2 and Mysore University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 91 local. There was no significant difference between Mysore local and Kanva-2 (Table 4.33). Table 4.33: Influence of N sources on leaf N after pruning Variety Nitrogen source Mean Control Urea SoA NPK Kanva-2 157 560 407 431 389 S-36 202 783 589 644 555 Mysore local 166 691 391 386 408 Mean 175 678 463 487 LSD (0.05): V= 88.5; N= 87.4; V x N= 145.3. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 92 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION 5.0 The Status of Sericulture in Ghana 5.1 Demographic Characteristics of Sericulture Farmers The results indicate that economically active labour force is engaged in sericulture. More males are engaged in silk farming in Ghana than females. Olaleye (2000) reported that there are more males into rural agriculture than females in Nigeria. It was also observed that the majority of sericulture farmers are educated and this directly linked with technology adoption and productivity. The educated farmers are likely to be more productive as compared than uneducated farmers. Sericulture is a venture which requires specialized skills and this may be attributed to the high level of education among the farmers. The study revealed that the household size of sericulture farmers in Ghana is large. The large family sizes serve as sources of family labour, since large households will pay less for labour and reduce the cost of production thereby increasing the income of farmers. The Brong-Ahafo Region has the highest number of sericulture farmers. This may be attributed to the favourable climatic and environmental factors for the growth of mulberry and rearing of the silkworm. The climatic and environmental factors prevailing in the Northern Region may not be conducive for the production of cocoons throughout the year. Hence, the fewer number of silk farmers in that Region. The challenges which beset the sericulture industry may have contributed to the low cocoon production and low patronage of the industry by farmers. It may be the same reason why farmers cultivate other crops other than mulberry and also why farmers use it University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 93 as subsidiary instead of full time occupation. Savithri et al. (2013) has reported similar challenges in India. The results show that most of the silkworm eggs were imported from India indicating the keen interest of India in promoting sericulture in Ghana. Kenya has similar climatic and environmental conditions as Ghana. Due to these factors, worms from Kenya would be better adapted to the Ghanaian conditions than those from other countries. 5.2 Influence of Inorganic N on Growth Parameters of Mulberry Varieties The results of the study revealed that inorganic N sources enhanced the growth, leaf yield and quality of mulberry. Growth parameters such as plant height stem girth, number of leaves and dry matter production increased with the application of N than the control. The results obtained in this study agree with the report that nitrogen is essential for plant growth (Chiroma et al., 2006; Adamtey et al., 2009). Results of experiment 1 indicated high growth with the application of SoA whiles in experiment 2, plants responded to NPK more than the other fertilizers. The difference in response to the N sources by mulberry varieties may be due to genetic variability and physiological processes among the varieties (Chandra et al., 1992). Also, it may be attributed to residual effect by the compound fertilizer (NPK). The results also showed that nitrogen application increased nutrients uptake leading to enhanced carbohydrate synthesis thereby resulting in increased cell division and enlargement with resultant increase in plant height and stem diameter (Prabhu et al., 2003). Application of nitrogen also promotes plant growth by increasing the number and length of internodes which results in increased plant height and stem girth. The increased number of leaves could be attributed to enhanced cell division and growth as well as availability of nutrients for leaf initiation. Bongale et al. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 94 (2000) and Shahbazi (2005) had also reported that N application increased the number of leaves in mulberry. 5.3 Leaf Yield of Mulberry Increased leaf yield may be due to increased number of leaves and leaf area which may be due to the application of inorganic nitrogen. The application of inorganic N led to the release and enhanced uptake of nitrogen and other plant nutrients which resulted in leaf initiation, cell division and leaf expansion, increased light interception, increased photosynthesis and dry matter production and partitioning into leaves (Bose and Majumder, 1998)). The results obtained in this study showed high leaf yield in S-36 at the application of SoA (250kg N/ha) and NPK (300kg N/ha). This confirms earlier report that application of 200, 250 and 300kg N/ha significantly increased leaf yield more than control in mulberry (Majumder et al., 2003). Shivaprakash et al. (2000) and Ghosh et al. (1997) reported higher leaf yield in S-36 at the application of 300kg N/ha/year but at a spacing of 60cm x 60cm. Islam et al. (1982) also reported significant increase in leaf yield of mulberry as a result of N application compared to the control. Bose and Majumder (1998) also investigated the influence of nitrogen on mulberry and reported that the application of fertilizer nitrogen increased the leaf yield and other vegetative parameters more than the control. 5.4 Leaf Quality of Mulberry The present study showed increase leaf quality of mulberry following the application of N. The results revealed high leaf moisture and crude protein in S-36 and high mineral University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 95 content and crude protein in Mysore local. The increase in leaf moisture, leaf crude protein, leaf mineral content (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) and leaf N by SoA and NPK may be due to the presence of more than one nutrient in the compound fertilizers. The current results corroborate the report of Subbaswamy et al. (1999) who studied the influence of different sources of inorganic nitrogen fertilizers on leaf quality of mulberry and reported higher leaf yield and high leaf protein content in plants fertilized with ammonium sulphate compared with plants fertilized with calcium ammonium nitrate and urea. Also, Manchashetty (1979) observed that application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) to mulberry increased leaf quality with reference to crude protein and mineral content of the leaves. The application of NPK and other compound fertilizers enhances the uptake of nutrients by plants and the presence of minerals other than N increases plants access to minerals. This increases the mineral nutrition of plants, hence high quality crops. Subbarayappa et al. (1994) also reported that the application of ammonium sulphate increased leaf quality of mulberry compared with the control (no fertilizer), ammonium nitrate and urea. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 96 CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.0 Conclusion It can be concluded that the numerous challenges that beset the industry is a contributing factor to the low patronage of sericulture and production of cocoon in Ghana. From the study, it can be concluded that the application NPK and SoA increased growth, leaf yield and quality of mulberry than urea and control (no fertilizer application) before pruning. However, in the regrowth, urea application resulted in the highest moisture and protein content of leaves compared to the application of NPK and SoA. Among the varieties, S-36 gave the highest leaf yield and quality (moisture and protein content of leaves).High protein content and fast growth was observed in Mysore local. These results have important agronomic and nutritional implications for sericulture in Ghana. The combined application of SoA and NPK would results the production of quality mulberry leaves for sericulture. It can be concluded from the results that S-36 and Mysore local are more productive in the coastal savannah zone than Kanva-2. 6.1 Recommendations Based on the results obtained, the following recommendations are made:  From the study, S-36 is recommended for chawky rearing due to its high moisture and high protein content.  Due to its high mineral and protein content, Mysore local is recommended for late instar rearing of silkworm. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 97  The government and non-governmental agencies in the field of agriculture should embark on awareness campaign to promote sericulture production in Ghana  The government should support the establishment of reeling centres to add value to cocoons produced  Training programmes should be organized for farmers to equip farmers with the necessary skills for quality cocoon production  Further studies should be conducted in different ecological zones to determine the suitability of the different varieties to the different ecological zones of Ghana.  Further research should be carried out using organic and inorganic fertilizers to assess the response of the different mulberry varieties to integrated fertilizer management University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 98 REFERENCES Abu-Rayyan, A. M. and Al-Hadidi, N. A. (2005). Onion production and nitrogen uptake in response to different doses of urea fertilizer at two different plant populations. Journal of King Saud University Agricultural Sciences18(1), 19-34. Adamtey, N., Olufunke, C., Ofosu-Budu, K.G., Ofosu-Anim, J., Danso, S.K.A. and Dionys, F. (2009c). Evaluation of different rates of N-enriched co-compost on maize (Zea mays L.). Part II: Effect on nutrient uptake and use efficiency. Agricultural Ecosystem and Environment (under review) p.15 Amanullah, H. R. and Shah, Z. (2008). Effects of plant density and N on growth dynamics and light interception in maize. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science54, 401- 411. Amoah, J. (2012). Update on silk production and demonstration factory: A report submitted to the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, CSIR-IIR/TR/JA/2012/002. Anonymous, (1969) Residual effect of nitrogen fertilization on the yield of mulberry. Annual Report, Central Sericulture Research and Training Institute, Mysore, India, p. 60-62. Anonymous, (2003) Sericulture and Silk Industry Statistics – 2003, Central Silk Board, pp. 11. Anonymous, (1994a). Evaluation of selected mulberry genotypes under irrigated condition – final yield trial-1. Annual Report, Central Sericulture Research and Training Institute, Mysore, India, p. 14-16. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 99 Anonymous, (1979). Response of new mulberry cultivars to different Agronomical practices. Annual Report, Central Sericulture Research and Training Institute, Mysore, India, p. 17- 19. Baksh, S., Mir, M. R., Darzi, G. M. and Khan, M. A., (2000). Performance of hardwood stem cuttings of mulberry genotypes under temperate climatic conditions of Kashmir, India. Indian Journal of Sericulture 39(1), 30 - 32. Balemi, T., Pal, N. and Saxena, A. K. (2007). Response of onion (Allium cepa L.) to combined application of biological and chemical nitrogenous fertilizers. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica89(1), 107-114. Bhaskar, R. N., Govindan, R., Devaiah, M. C., Chandrappa, H., Ravikumar, A. and Sridevi, G., (2003). Influence of different levels of NPK fertilization on growth parameters of mulberry. Proceedings of National Conference on Tropical Sericulture forGlobal Competitiveness. pp. 58. Bijimol, G. and Singh, A. K. (2001). Effect of spacing and nitrogen on gladiolus under Nagaland condition. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture64, 36–9. Bindroo, B. B., Anil, D., Koul, S., Trag, A. R. and Dhar, A. (2000). Studies on dormancy and sprouting behaviour of mulberry (Morussp) under sub-tropical agroclimate. Indian Journal of Forestry23(4), 411-414. Bongale, U. D. and Krishna, M. (2000). Leaf quality of mulberry (Morus indica L.) and cocoon crops of the silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) as influenced by sewage and bore well water irrigation. Indian Journal of Sericulture39(2), 165- 168. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 100 Bongale, U. D., Gowda, S. N. and Narayana, V. M. (2000). Effect of different plant densities and nitrogen levels on Viswa (DD), S-36 and M-5 mulberry (Morus indica L.) varieties under irrigated condition. Indian Journal of Sericulture39(2), 103-107. Bose, P. C. and Majumder, S. K. (1998). Response of mulberry (Morus alba L.) to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Journal of Sericulture, 6(1&2) : 45-46. Bremner, J. (1965). Total nitrogen, pp. 1372–1376. In Methods of Soil Analysis (Edited by C. A. Black, D. D. Evans, J. L. White, L. E. Ensminger and F. E. Clark). American Society of Agronomy Monograph, 9. Madison, Wisconsin. Broschat, T. K. and Moore, K. A. (2001). Influence of substrate and fertilizer analysis and rate on growth and quality of five species of bedding plants. Horticulture Technology11, 56–61. Central Silk Board (2002) Silk in India. A Statistical Biennial. Bangalore: Central Silk Board Chandra, S., Varshncy, M. S., Sing, J and Singh, S. K. (1992). Response of wheat varieties to different levels of nitrogen. Narendra Deva. Journal of Agriculture Research, 7, 167–71. Chatzopoulou, P. S., Koutsos, T. V and Katsiotis, S. T. (2006). Study of nitrogen fertilization rate on fennel cultivars for essential oil yield and composition. Journal of Vegetable Science, 12, 85-93. Chiroma, A.M., O.A. Folorunso and A.B. Alhassan. 2006. The effects of land configuration and wood-shavings mulch on the properties of a sandy loam soil in northeast Nigeria. 1. Changes in chemical properties. Tropicultura, 24, 129-134. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 101 Christiaensen, L. and L. Demery (2007), Down to Earth Agriculture and Poverty Reduction in Africa, The World Bank Group. Dar, Q. A. H., Chattopadhyay, T. K., Misra, R. L. and Sanyat, M. (2002). Studies on growth characters of Zinnia. Indian Society of Ornamental Horticulture, New Delhi, India. pp. 203–205 (CAB Absts. 2002/08–2003/04). Das, B. C. and Krishnaswami, S. (1965). Some observations on interspecific hybridization in mulberry. Indian Journal of Sericulture 4, 1 – 8. Datta, R. K. (2007) Mulberry Cultivation and Utilization in India. FAO Electronic conference onmulberry for animal production (Morus-L). Available online http://www.fao.org/ DOCREP/005/ X9895E/x9895e04.htm #Top of Page. Dingle, J. G. ( 2000). Silk production in Australia. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. RIRDC Publication, 00/56, pp. 48. Dingle, J. G., Hassan, E., Gupta, M., George, D., Anota, L. and Begum, H. (2005). Silk production in Australia: A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Silk Production in Australia5, 145. Ercisli, S. (2004) A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genetic Resources and crop Evolution 51, 419-435. Ercisli, S. and Orhan, E. (2007) Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), FAO (2001). Food and Agriculture Organisation Statistical Website, Rome (http://www.fao.org/). Geetha, G. S. and Indira, R. (2011). „Silkworm Rearing by Rural Women in Karnataka: A Path to Empowerment‟, Indian Journal of Gender Studies18(1), 89–102. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 102 Ghosh, A., Ambika, P. K. and Mishra, R. K., (1997). Effect of varieties, spacings and fertilizer doses on growth, yield and quality of mulberry. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 36(2) : 138-141. Gongyin, Y. and Cui, H. (1996). Some features of silk producing moths.Tropicultura, 14 (1): 30-33. Hend, E. W. (2002). Response of Zinnia elegans to phosphorus and potassium fertilizers (CAB Abstracts 2002/08–2003/04). Imayavaramban, V., Thanunathan, K., Thiruppathi, M., Singaravel, R., Dandapani, A. and Selvakumar, P. (2004). Effect of combining organic and inorganic fertilizers for sustained productivity of traditional rice cv. Kambanchamba. Research crops5(1), 11-13. Imtiaz, M., G. Ahmad, G., Hussain, R., Ahmad, Z. A and Chaudhry, G. A. (1995). Response of wheat cultivars to different fertilizer levels under rainfed conditions. Journal of Agriculture Research, 35, 329–35. Islam, R., Bari, M. A. and Ahsan, Z. (1982). Effect of different levels of fertilizers on leaf yield of mulberry under irrigated condition. Bangladesh Journal of Agriculture, 6(7), 25-30. Iyengar, S. (1970). Effect of plant densities, methods of leaf harvest and nitrogen fertilization on the leaf yield of irrigated mulberry in Mysore state. Indian Journal of sericulture, 9, 43-48. Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, pp. 259-260. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 103 Jayeola, V. and Adeduntan, S. A. (2002). Sericulture in Ondo state: A means of alleviating rural poverty. In Forestry and Challenges of sustainable livelihood Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Forestry Association of Nigeria held in Akure, Ondo state, pp. 202-207. Karic, L., Vukasinovic, S. and Znidarcic, D. (2005). Response of leek (Allium porrum L.) to different levels of nitrogen dose under agro-climatic conditions of Bosniaand Herzegovina. ActaAgriculturaeSlovenica 85, 219-226. Kasi, E. (2000). Development and Change due to sericulture: A village study in Chittoor District. Hyderabad: University of Hyderabad (Unpublished M. Phil Dissertation). Kasi, E. (2009a). Anthropology and development in a globalized India: An ethnography of sericulture from the South. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Kasi, E. (2009d). „Socio-Cultural dimensions of sericulture: A village study from Andhra. Kasiviswanathan, K. and Iyengar, S. M. N. (1970). Effect of plant densities, method of leaf yield and nitrogen fertilization on the leaf yield of irrigated mulberry in Mysore state. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 9(1) : 43-48. Kasiviswanathan, K. and Iyengar, S. M. N. (1965). Preliminary observations on varietal cum irrigated response to different levels of N on the seasonal and total yield of mulberry leaf. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 4(4) : 22-23. Kasiviswanathan, K. and Iyengar, S. M. N. (1966). Effect of NPK manuring on the seasonal and total yield of mulberry. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 5(1) : 46-51. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 104 Kasiviswanathan, K., Parankumar, T., Chowdhary, P. C. and Somashakara K. S. (1988). Moricultural practical, International congress on tropical sericulture practices, Lead paper 2. Central silkboard Bangalore, India, p. 11. Katsumata, F. (1972). Relationship between the length of styles and the shape of idioplasts in mulberry leaves, with special reference to the classification of mulberry trees. Journal of Sericulture Science (Japan) 41:387–395. Kioko, E. N., Raina, S. K., Okwae, K. F., Ngoka, B. and Mbahin, N. (2007). Harnessing wild silkmoth biodiversity for environmental conservation and income generation, 151-154, In: Development of Sericulture and Apiculture products for the poor in fragile Ecosystems Using the Value chain Approach. Raina, S. K., Muli, E. M., Nguku, E. K. and Kioko, E. N. (Eds) Proceedings of the Trainers course and the fourth International Workshop on the Conservation and Utilisation of Commercial Insects. The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Headquarters, Duduville, Nairobi, Kenya, 14th November -8th December, 2006, ICIPE Science Press, Nairobi, Kenya. Koidzumi, G. (1917). Taxonomy and phytogeography of the genus Morus. Bulletin of Sericulture Kongresi, 1-18 Kasım 1999, Cilt III, Cayır- MeraYembitkileriveYemeklikTaneBaklagiller, Adana. pp.172-177. Koul, G. G. (1997). Effect of sowing methods, nitrogen levels and seed rates on yield and quality of fodder maize (Zea mays L.). Master of Science Thesis submitted to University of Khartoum, Faculty of Agriculture. Koyuncu, F. (2004). Organic acid composition of black mulberry. Chemistry of natural compounds 40:368-369. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 105 Krishnaswami, S., Kumararaj, S., Vijayaraghavan, K. and Kasiviswanathan K. (1971) “Silkworm feeding trails for evaluating the quality of mulberry leaves as influenced by variety, spacing and nitrogen fertilization”, Indian Journal of Sericulture10 (1), 79-89. Kumar, M., Chattopadhyay, T. K. and Mukesh, M. (2002). Effect of NPK on yield and quality of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorusL.) cv. Tropic Sea. Environmental Ecology 19, 868–71. Lakshmanan, S., Balasaraswathi, S. and Mani, A. (2011). „Rural labour employment through silk farming. Law-Ogbomo, K. and Egharevba, E. (2009). Effects of planting density and NPK fertilizer application on yield and yield components of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill) in forest location. WorldJournal of Agriculture Science5(2), 152-158. Majumder, S. K., Bose, P. C., Kar, R., Banerjee, N. D. and Ghosh, J. K. (2003). Studies on the seasonal variation of NPK uptake by mulberry (Morus alba L.). Indian Journal of Sericulture, 42(1), 1-3. Manchashetty, K. (1979). Influence of soil and foliar nitrogen on the yield and quality of mulberry and silk fibre. Master of Science (Agriculture) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore. Marzouk, H. A., and Kassem, H. A. (2011). Improving fruit quality, nutritional value and yield of Zaghloul dates by the application of organic and/or mineral fertilizers. Scientia Horticulturae 127, 249–254. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 106 Ntaanu, P. K. (2007). Present status of sericulture in Ghana and its prospects for integration in IFAD projects, pp 88-95. In: Development of Sericulture and Apiculture products for the poor in fragile Ecosystems Using the Value chain Approach. Raina, S. K., Muli, E. M., Nguku, E. K. and Kioko, E. N. (Eds) Proceedings of the Trainers course and the fourth International Workshop on the Conservation and Utilisation of Commercial Insects. The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), Headquarters, Duduville, Nairobi, Kenya, 14th November -8th December, 2006, ICIPE Science Press, Nairobi, Kenya. Ntaanu, P. K. and Qaiyyum, M. A. (2009). Effect of different levels of NPK fertilizers and irrigation on yield and nutritive value of mulberry leaf. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 34(3) : 435- 442. Ntaanu, P. K. (2012). Founder and Technical Director, Sericulture Promotion and Development Association, Ghana. Personal Communication. Olaleye, R. (2000). Effectiveness of development intervention for economic empowerment on rural in Ondo, Nigeria. An unpublished PhD thesis submitted to the department agricultural extension and rural development; University of Ibadan, Ibadan. Pain, A. K. (1965). Effect of NPK fertilizers and their combinations on the yield and nutritive value of mulberry. Journal of Sericulture, 4(3):1-8. Paul, N. K. and Qaiyyum, M. A. (2009). Effect of different levels of NPK fertilizer and irrigation on yield and nutritive quality of mulberry leaf. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 34(3), 435-442. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 107 Prabhu, M., Veeraraaghavatham, D. and Srinivasan, K. (2003). Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and yield of egg plant hybrid COBH-1. South Indian Horticulture51 (1-6), 152-156 Phukan, J. D. (2000). Growth and leaf yield of a few improved mulberry strains as influenced by soil and agroclimatic conditions in N. E. India. Indian Journal of Sericulture 39(1), 84-85. Quader, M. A., M. A. Qayyum, A. A. Sarkar, M. A. Rab and S. U. Ahmed. 1992. Varietal response to NPK-fertilizers in combination with foliar spray of urea on leaf yield and quality of mulberry. Bulletin of Sericulture Research 3: 54-66. Raina, S. K, Nyagode, B., Aldovar, V. and Kioko, E. (2000). ICIPE‟s groundwork in building African commercial insects farming industries for the new millenium. In the Conservation and utilization of Commercial Insects. Rajan, M. V., Dandin, S. V., Magadum, S. V. and Datta, R. K. (2000). Nutritional evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp) genotypes through silkworm growth studies. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology20(1), 47-53. red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry fruits. Food Chemistry103, 1380–1384. Rajegowda, S. M. A., Jayaramaiah, M. K. and Maibaum, W. (1999). Response of mulberry (Morus indica L.) to nitrogen and potassium sulphate levels and its economics. XVIII International Sericultural Commission Congress, 12-16 October, Bangkok, pp. 12-16. Ray, D., Mandal, L. N., Pain, A. K. and Mandal, S. K. (1973). Effect of NPK and farmyard manure on the yield and nutritive value of mulberry leaf. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 12(7) : 7-12. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 108 Rangaswamy, G., Narasimhanna, S. M. N., Kasiviswanathan, S. K., Sastry, S. C. R. and Manjeet, S. J. (1976). Mulberry cultivation, FAO, Agriculture, Sericulture Bulletin. Reddy, M. P., Rao, D. M. R., Satayanarayan, N. and Reddy, P. K. (2002). Performance of some mulberry genotypes under semi-arid conditions of Andhra Pradesh. Advances in Plant Sciences15, 249–254. Sakthivel, N., Kumaresan, P., Qadri, S. M. H., Ravikumar, J. and Balakrishna, R. (2012). Adoption of integrated pest management in sericulture – A case study in Tamil Nadu. Journal of Biological pest, 5, 212-215. Sanchez, M. D. (2000a). World Distribution and Utilization of Mulberry, Potential for Animal Feeding. FAO Electronic conference on mulberryfor animal production (Morus-L) Available online http://www.fao.org/ DOCREP/005/ X9895E/x9895e02.htm Sanchez MD (2000b).Mulberry: an exceptional forage available almost worldwide. World AnimalReview 93(1), FAO, Rome Sarkar, A., Jalaja, S. K. and Datta, R. K. (2000). Gradual improvement of mulberry varieties under irrigated conditions in South India and the optimal programme for varietal selection in the tropics. Sericologia, 40(3):449-461. Savithri, G., Sujathamma, P. and Neeraja, P. (2013) Indian sericulture industry for sustainable economy. International journal of economics, commerce and Research, 3: 73-78. Sengupta, K., Ray, D., Singh, B. D. and Krishnaswami, S. (1972). Studies on the effect of high dose nitrogen fertilization of soil on the yield, chemical composition and University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 109 nutritive value of mulberry leaf as evaluated from rearing results. Indian Journal of Sericulture, 11(1) : 28-32. Shahbazi, M. (2005). Effects of different nitrogen levels on the yield and nitrate accumulation in the four of lettuce cultivars. Master of Science Thesis, Department of Horticulture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, pp 99. Shaheen, A. M., Fatma, A., Hoda, R., Habib, A. M. and El-Baky, A. M. M. H. (2010). Nitrogen soil dressing and foliar spraying by sugar and amino acids as affected the growth, yield and its quality of onion plant. Journal of American Science 6(8), 420-427. Shankar, M. A., Deviah, M. C., Anitha Peter and Rangaswamy, B. T. (2000). Effect of graded levels of organic manure on growth, yield and quality of mulberry in relation to silkwrom growth and cocoon production. Crop Research, 19 : 128-132. Sharma A, Sharma R, Machii H (2000) Assessment of genetic diversity in a Morus germplasm collection using fluorescence-based AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 1049-1055. Shivaprakash, R. M., Bongale, U. D., Dandin, S. B., Basavaiah, Siddalingaswamy, N. and NarayanaGowda, S. N. (2000). Nitrogen uptake and shoot yield in three improved varieties of mulberry (Morus indica L.) under irrigated field cultivation. Indian Journal of Sericulture39(2), 145-148. Simpson, S. J, and Simpson, C. L. (1990). The mechanisms of nutritional compensation by phytophagous insects. In: Bernays E A. Insect-plant Interactions, Vol. II. New York: CPC Press, Inc. 111-160. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 110 Singh, P. K., Singh, B. D. and Saraswat, S. B., (2001). Fertilizer response on the growth and biomass of mulberry (Morus alba L.) in sub-tropical conditions. National Seminar onMulberry Sericulture Research, India, pp. 71. Singh, S. P., Gour, B. L. and Hawal, S. (1992). Effect of cultivar spacing and nitrogen fertilization on yield and nutrient uptake by maize. Annual Agriculture Research13, 277–279. Singh, S. P., Rai, S. K. and Katiyar, R. S. (2002). Effect of nitrogen and phosphorous on growth and yield of Foeniculum vulgare on the sodic soils. Journal of Medicinal Aroma. Plant Science24(1), 65-67. Sinha, P. S., Gangwar, S. K., Singh, B. D., Jaiswal, J. and Griyaghey, U. P. (2001). Evaluation of some elite mulberry (Moru salba L.) varieties and NPK levels under partially irrigated conditions from sericulture view point. Indian Journal of Agriculture Research, 35(2), 71-78. Smith, P., Martino, D. and Cai, Z. C. (2007). Agriculture. In: Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., Meyer, L.A. (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Subbarayappa, C. T., Sinha, A. K., Sandareswaran, P., Singhvi, N. R and Datta, R. K.(1994) Effect of split doses of fertilizers on yield of mulberry leaves. Indian Journal of Sericulture 33: 72-73. Tipton, J. (1994) Relative drought resistance among selected southwestern landscape plants. Journal ofArboriculture 20: 151-155. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 111 Torun, M. and Koycu, C. (1996). A study on nitrogen requirement of some corn cultivars grown at çar_amba plain. O. M. U. Agriculture Faculty Journal, 11, 1-15. Tutin, G. T. (1996) Morus L. In: Tutin, G. T., Burges, N. A., Chater, A. O., Edmondson, J. R., Ushioda, T. (1954). Soil and fertilizer for mulberry plantation. Synthesized Science of Sericulture, Chousansi Kvokai Tyohobn, Tokyo, pp. 12-38. Waalkley, A. and Black, I. A. (1934) An examination of degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification or the chronoc acid titration method. Soil science37: 27-37 Wang, B., Dai Xuan-yin, and Ding, R. (2001), Sericulture of Jiangsu 3 (1), 13-15. World Bank (2008b), “World development report: Agriculture for development”, The world bank group. Yamanouchi, H. (2001) Agronomic Characteristics of new mulberry cultivars: Comparison of new cultivars Norin No 10 to 16 at 15 Locations. Bulletin of the National Institute of Sericulture and Entomology Science23, 1-104. Yokoyama, T. (1962) Synthesized Science of Sericulture, Japan, pp. 39-46. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 112 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Interview Schedule UNIVERSITY OF GHANA COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SCIENCES CROP SCIENCE DEPARTMENT STATUS OF SERICULTURE IN GHANA The impact of the sericulture industry has not been fully realised. Therefore the need to assess its current status in Ghana and the way forward for the industry. I would be very grateful if you could provide information on the current status of Sericulture in Ghana for my graduate studies at the Department of Crop Science, University of Ghana. You are assured that the information given would be treated as strictly confidential and that no reference would be made to you in presenting the results. Thank you. Demographic Information Region ………………………. District ……………………….................... Town/Village/community ……………… Date of Interview …………………............... Name of enumerator ………………………………………………….. Name and telephone number of the farmer………………………………………………. Socio-economic characteristics Please tick [√ ] where appropriate. 1. Age of respondent:…………………..years. 2. Gender of respondent: 1. Male [ ] 2. Female [ ] 3. Marital status: 1. Single. 2. Married. 3. Divorced. 4. Separated University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 113 4. Are you the head of household? 1. Yes 2. No 5. Religion of respondent: 1. Christian 2. Muslim. 3. Traditional religion 4. Other, specify, … 6. Native of community? 1. Yes 2. No If no, indicate where you come from …………………………………. 7. For how long have you been resident here?.........……………. Years 8. Level of education of farmer 1. No schooling. 3. JSS. 5. SSS 7. O /A Level 9. Tertiary 2. Primary 4. MSLC. 6. Voc/Tech 8. Training college 10. Informal 9. Household size of the respondent. ………………………………………. Cultivation and sources of mulberry varieties and silkworm races in Ghana 10. Ownership of land: (1) Personal property (2) Family property (3) Lease (4) Others, if others, specify: ......................................... 11. What is the total acreage of all your farmlands?......................................................... 12. What is the size of your mulberry farm/total land area cultivated to mulberry?? ...................................................................................................... 13. Apart from mulberry, what other crops do you cultivate? .................................................................................................................................... 14. What variety(s) of mulberry do you cultivate?............................................................ 15. Why do you grow this variety(s)?................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................... 16. Where do you normally get your planting materials?................................................. 17. How many cuttings do you plant per plot?................................................................. 18. Indicate the planting distance ……………………………………………………………….. 19. How long have you been into sericulture?.................................................................. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 114 20. What are some of the major constraints/challenges to mulberry production in this area? ................................................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................................................ 21. On the average, what is the quantity of mulberry you produce in a year?................... 22. Do you have the wild mulberry variety in this area? (1) Yes (2) No 23. Apart from mulberry, is there any other plant that can be fed to silkworm? (1). Yes (2). No If yes, mention the plant or any two of such plants........................................................... 24. What race(s) of silkworm do you rear?.................................................................... 25. Why do you rear this race(s) of the silkworm?....................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................. 26. Where do you get the silkworm eggs?...................................................................... 27. Do you have the wild silkworm race in this area? (1). Yes (2). No 28. Have you noticed people who harvest cocoon from the wild in this area? (1). Yes (2). No 29. What rearing techniques do you use in producing the silkworms? .................................................................................................................................................. 30. On the average, what is the total quantity of silkworms you produce in a year?.................... 31. What are some of the major constraints/challenges to silkworm production in this area? .................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................. 32. Do you attend training programmes on sericulture? (1). Yes (2). No University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 115 33. If yes, how often do you attend such training programmes? (1). Very often (2). Often (3). Not very often 34. Which organization(s) offers such training programmes?........................................... ................................................................................................................................................ 35. Do you pay for the trainings programmes? (1). Yes (2). No Marketing of cocoons in Ghana 36. On the average, what is the quantity of cocoon you produce per season?................... 37. Do you have access to ready markets for the produce? (1). Yes (2). No 38. How are your cocoons marketed?............................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................. 39. How much do you sell 1kg of cocoon?....................................................................... 40. How do you determine the price of the cocoon?....................................................... .................................................................................................................................................. 41. In which form do you normally sell the cocoon?........................................................ 42. What are some of the major challenges/constraints associated with the marketing of the cocoons? .................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................. . University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 116 Profitability of sericulture in Ghana 43. How would you rate the sericulture industry in Ghana in terms of profitability? (1). Not profitable (2). Profitable (3). Not very profitable (4). Very profitable 44. Would you encourage other farmers to take up this venture? (1). Yes (2). No 45. What other work do you do apart from sericulture?..................................................... 46. Do you cultivate mulberry in the dry season? (1). Yes (2). No 47. Do you use irrigation on your mulberry farm? (1). Yes (2). No 48. If yes, what type of irrigation facility do you use? (1). Sprinkler (2). Water pump (3) Drip/irrigation pipes (4). Use of bucket 49. What is the source of your irrigation water? (1). Well (2). Dam/stream (3). Pond (4). Others, please specify…………………………………………………………… 50. Do you always have access to labour for production? (1). Yes (2). No 51. If yes, what type of labour: (1). Family labour (2). Hired labour (3) Cooperative (4). Both family and hired (5). Others, please specify......................................... 52. In one season, how many labourers do you employ?.................................................... 53. Do you usually have access to credit facilities for production? (1). Yes (2). No 54. If yes, what are your main sources of credit: (1). Banks (2).Money lenders (3). Family and friends (4) Others, please specify...................................................... 55. Do you use fertilizer in your mulberry farm? (1). Yes (2). No 56. If yes, what type of fertilizer do you use? (1). Organic fertilizer (2). Inorganic fertilizer 57. What type organic or inorganic fertilizer do you apply in your farm? ……………………………………………………………………………………… 58. What quantity of the fertilizer do you use? ....................................................................................................................................... University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 117 59. Kindly outline some of the key things that you would like the government and/or other organizations to do about the sericulture industry in Ghana? ............................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 118 Appendix 2: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for experiment 1 ANOVA for leaf fresh weight (g/plant) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 100.9 50.4 0.46 Variety 2 686.5 343.2 3.13 0.152 Residual 4 439.2 109.8 0.93 Nitrogen source 3 18598.8 6199.6 52.63 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 1308.4 218.1 1.85 0.145 Residual 18 2120.1 117.8 Total 35 23253.8 ANOVA for Leaf dry weight (g/plant) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. replication 2 81.89 40.94 0.65 variety 2 342.43 171.21 2.71 0.181 Residual 4 253.13 63.28 3.03 Nitrogen source 3 2103.48 701.16 33.57 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 723.21 120.54 5.77 0.002 Residual 18 375.96 20.89 Total 35 3880.11 ANOVA for fresh leaf yield (kg/ha) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 15372. 7686. 0.46 Variety 2 104633. 52317. 3.13 0.152 Residual 4 66944. 16736. 0.93 Nitrogen source 3 2834896. 944965. 52.63 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 199429. 33238. 1.85 0.145 Residual 18 323160. 17953. Total 35 3544435. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 119 ANOVA for leaf dry yield (kg/ha) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 12482. 6241. 0.65 Variety 2 52194. 26097. 2.71 0.181 Residual 4 38583. 9646. 3.03 Nitrogen source 3 320621. 106874. 33.57 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 110235. 18372. 5.77 0.002 Residual 18 57305. 3184. Total 35 591421. ANOVA for leaf moisture (%) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 100.9 50.4 0.46 Variety 2 686.5 343.2 3.13 0.152 Residual 4 439.2 109.8 0.93 Nitrogen source 3 18598.8 6199.6 52.63 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 1308.4 218.1 1.85 0.145 Residual 18 2120.1 117.8 Total 35 23253.8 ANOVA for leaf crude protein (%) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 2.0835 1.0418 0.56 Variety 2 21.5238 10.7619 5.82 0.065 Residual 4 7.4024 1.8506 2.83 Nitrogen source 3 123.3340 41.1113 62.97 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 25.6085 4.2681 6.54 <.001 Residual 18 11.7508 0.6528 Total 35 191.7031 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 120 Appendix 3: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for experiment 2 ANOVA for leaf fresh weight (g/plant) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 185. 93. 0.05 Variety 2 24969. 12485. 6.36 0.057 Residual 4 7852. 1963. 1.43 Nitrogen source 3 236186. 78729. 57.42 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 23962. 3994. 2.91 0.036 Residual 18 24680. 1371. Total 35 317835. ANOVA for dry leaf weight (g/plant) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 590.3 295.2 0.39 Variety 2 8418.9 4209.5 5.63 0.069 Residual 4 2991.9 748.0 2.50 Nitrogen source 3 13128.2 4376.1 14.62 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 2948.6 491.4 1.64 0.193 Residual 18 5387.8 299.3 Total 35 33465.7 ANOVA for leaf fresh yield (kg/ha) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 7050. 3525. 0.05 Variety 2 951484. 475742. 6.36 0.057 Residual 4 299190. 74797. 1.43 Nitrogen source 3 9000098. 3000033. 57.42 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 913101. 152184. 2.91 0.036 Residual 18 940465. 52248. Total 35 12111387. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 121 ANOVA for dry leaf yield (kg/ha) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 22494. 11247. 0.39 Variety 2 320811. 160405. 5.63 0.069 Residual 4 114010. 28503. 2.50 Nitrogen source 3 500262. 166754. 14.62 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 112358. 18726. 1.64 0.193 Residual 18 205308. 11406. Total 35 1275243. ANOVA for leaf moisture (%) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 25.93 12.96 1.29 Variety 2 121.10 60.55 6.03 0.062 Residual 4 40.15 10.04 0.51 Nitrogen source 3 334.95 111.65 5.73 0.006 Variety x Nitrogen source 6 322.10 53.68 2.75 0.045 Residual 18 351.01 19.50 Total 35 1195.25 ANOVA for leaf crude protein (%) Source of variation d.f. s.s. m.s. v.r. F pr. Replication 2 23.280 11.640 1.19 Variety 2 4.594 2.297 0.23 0.801 Residual 4 39.226 9.806 1.81 Nitrogen source 3 1737.597 579.199 106.75 <.001 Variety x Nitrogen 6 12.706 2.118 0.39 0.876 Residual 18 97.663 5.426 Total 35 1915.065 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh