University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh UNIVERSITY OF GHANA ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP AND GROWTH OF SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES: LESSONS FROM TRANSFORMATIONAL ENTREPRENEURS IN GHANA BY GLORIA ADU-DARKO (10341955) THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF MPHIL MARKETING DEGREE. JUNE, 2017 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DECLARATION I hereby declare that this study is the result of my own research and has not been presented by anyone for any academic award in this or any other university. All references used in the work have been duly acknowledged. Thus, I am responsible for any shortcomings. ………………………………………….. ………………………….. GLORIA ADU-DARKO DATE (10341955) i University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this thesis was supervised in accordance with guidelines laid down by the University of Ghana. …………………………………………. ………………………….. DR. SAMUEL C. K. BUAME DATE (SUPERVISOR) …………………………………………. ………………………….. DR. KWAME ADOM DATE (CO-SUPERVISOR) ii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to God and my mum, Agnes Adu-Darko, for her endless support, prayers, love, and care. iii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My profound gratitude goes to my supervisors, Dr Samuel C. K. Buame and Dr Kwame Adom, for their constructive guidance, advice and valuable comments throughout the research process. I also thank my parents, Mr and Mrs Adu-Darko, my aunt, Madam Rebecca Adjei, my brothers, Mr. Nana Essilfie Adu-Darko and Mr. Samuel Offei Adu-Darko, and Mr David Adipah Yobo, for their support, encouragement, and understanding throughout this work. I also extend my appreciation to Mr. Shelter Teyi, Miss Bernice Ananga, Miss Aseda Mensah, as well as all members of the Marketing Department and MARCOMMS (UGBS) for their invaluable assistance and advice at various stages of this work. My sincere thanks go to Miss Adjoa Vyllas Ocran and Miss Kendicta A-Ensonga Ajene for their assistance in transcribing the data. To my classmates, ‘brand managers’ (Deborah Dede Narh and Aseda Mensah), and my loyal customers; you guys are just awesome. Thanks so much for making MPhil worthwhile. Last but not the least, my profound gratitude goes to all the respondents who took time off their busy schedule to participate in discussions and interviews and provided me with the necessary information for this study. iv University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ........................................................................................................................ i CERTIFICATION ..................................................................................................................... ii DEDICATION ......................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................................ iv TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. viii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... x ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. xi CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background of the Study ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Research Gap and Problem Statement ............................................................................. 3 1.3 Research Purpose ............................................................................................................. 6 1.4 Research Objectives ......................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Significance of the Study ................................................................................................. 7 1.6 Scope of the Study ........................................................................................................... 8 1.7 Chapter Disposition ......................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER TWO ..................................................................................................................... 10 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................ 10 2.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Evolution and definition of Entrepreneurship ............................................................... 10 2.2 Types of Entrepreneurship ............................................................................................. 13 2.3 Types of Entrepreneurs .................................................................................................. 15 2.4 Schools of Thoughts in Entrepreneurship ...................................................................... 17 2.4.1 The Classical School ............................................................................................... 17 2.4.2 The ‘Great Persons’ School .................................................................................... 18 2.4.3 The Intrapreneurship School ................................................................................... 18 2.4.4 The Psychological School ....................................................................................... 19 2.4.5 The Management School ......................................................................................... 19 2.4.6 The Leadership School ............................................................................................ 20 2.5 Leadership ...................................................................................................................... 20 2.6 Entrepreneurial Leadership ............................................................................................ 23 2.7 The five attributes of Entrepreneurial Leadership ......................................................... 25 2.7.1 Innovativeness ......................................................................................................... 26 2.7.2 Proactiveness ........................................................................................................... 30 2.7.3 Risk-taking .............................................................................................................. 32 2.7.4 Visionary ................................................................................................................. 35 2.7.5 Motivating ............................................................................................................... 35 2.8 Entrepreneurial Leadership and SME Growth ............................................................... 36 2.9 Theoretical Review- Human Capital of the Entrepreneur ............................................. 37 v University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER THREE ................................................................................................................. 38 CONTEXT OF STUDY .......................................................................................................... 38 3.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 38 3.1 Country Profile .............................................................................................................. 38 3.2 The History and Development of SMEs in Ghana ........................................................ 39 3.3 Concept of SMEs ........................................................................................................... 41 3.4 Ghanaian Understanding of SMEs ................................................................................ 43 3.5 Structure/Nature/Characteristics of SMEs ..................................................................... 44 3.6 Importance of SMEs ...................................................................................................... 47 3.7 Factors influencing the growth of SMEs ....................................................................... 48 3.8 Supporting, Facilitating and Regulatory Agencies of SMEs in Ghana ......................... 52 3.9 Overview of selected firms ............................................................................................ 54 3.9.1 Kama Health Services Limited (now known as Mikkado Holdings) ..................... 54 3.9.2 Forever Clair Beauty Clinic .................................................................................... 56 3.9.3 DAASCO Group ..................................................................................................... 57 3.9.4 Jandel Limited ......................................................................................................... 58 CHAPTER FOUR ................................................................................................................... 60 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 60 4.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 60 4.1 The Research Onion ....................................................................................................... 60 4.2 Research Philosophy underpinning the study ................................................................ 62 4.3 Research Approach ........................................................................................................ 65 4.4 Research Design ............................................................................................................ 66 4.5 Research Strategy .......................................................................................................... 69 4.6 Choice of Research Method ........................................................................................... 73 4.7 Types of data .................................................................................................................. 75 4.8 Population and Sampling ............................................................................................... 76 4.9 Data Collection Instrument ............................................................................................ 80 4.10 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................... 82 4.11 Time Horizon of the study ........................................................................................... 83 4.12 Validity and Argument Reliability .............................................................................. 84 4.13 Ethical Considerations ................................................................................................. 84 CHAPTER FIVE ..................................................................................................................... 86 DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS ..................................................... 86 5.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 86 5.1 Presentation of findings ................................................................................................. 86 Table 5.1.1 Characteristics of the Respondents ............................................................... 86 5.1.2 Understanding entrepreneurial leadership ............................................................... 88 5.1.2.1 Description of an Entrepreneurial leader ............................................................. 89 5.1.2.2 Innovativeness ...................................................................................................... 91 5.1.2.3 Proactiveness ........................................................................................................ 92 5.1.2.4 Risk-taking ........................................................................................................... 93 5.1.2.5 Visionary .............................................................................................................. 94 5.1.2.6 Influencer/Motivator ............................................................................................ 94 5.1.2.7 Instances that make respondents believe that they are entrepreneurial leaders ... 95 vi University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.2 Human Capital of an entrepreneur and SME growth..................................................... 99 5.3 Challenges of Entrepreneurial Leadership ................................................................... 101 5.3.1 Managing Challenges of Entrepreneurial Leaders ................................................ 104 5.4 Effect(s) of Entrepreneurial leadership on SME growth ............................................. 106 5.4.1 Number of employees (loyal) ................................................................................ 106 5.4.2 Number of Subsidiaries and branches ................................................................... 108 5.4.3 Assets and finances ............................................................................................... 110 5.4.4 Market Share ......................................................................................................... 111 5.5 Other findings .............................................................................................................. 112 5.5.1 Supernatural Being supporting growth ................................................................. 112 5.5.2 Gender and SME growth ....................................................................................... 113 5.5.3 Government support .............................................................................................. 113 5.5.4 Reasons why Ghanaian SMEs hardly grow into large firms ................................ 115 5.6 A Summary of the Cross-Case Analysis in relation to the objectives of the study ..... 117 5.7 Discussion of Findings ................................................................................................. 118 5.7.1 Understanding Entrepreneurial leadership (Objective 1) ...................................... 118 5.7.2 The role of Human Capital in achieving SME growth (Objective 2) ................... 119 5.7.3 Challenges of entrepreneurial leaders (Objective 3) ............................................. 120 5.7.4 Entrepreneurial Leadership and SME growth (Objective 4) ................................. 122 5.7.5 Gender and SME growth ....................................................................................... 123 5.7.6 Government support .............................................................................................. 123 5.7.7 Factors affecting SME growth .............................................................................. 124 CHAPTER SIX ..................................................................................................................... 125 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 125 6.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 125 6.1 Summary of the study .................................................................................................. 125 6.2 Summary of Major findings ......................................................................................... 126 6.2.1 Understanding entrepreneurial leadership (Objective 1) ...................................... 126 6.2.2 The role of Human Capital (Objective 2) ............................................................. 126 6.2.3 Challenges of entrepreneurial leadership (Objective 3) ........................................ 127 6.2.4 The effects of entrepreneurial leadership (Objective 4) ........................................ 127 6.2.5 Other notable finding ............................................................................................ 127 6.3 Conclusions .................................................................................................................. 128 6.4 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 128 6.5 Limitations and Suggestions for future research ......................................................... 129 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 131 APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................... 156 APPENDIX 1: INTERVIEW GUIDE ............................................................................... 156 APPENDIX 2: EXCERPT OF RESPONDENT 4 (CASE AJ’s) INTERVIEW ............... 157 EXHIBIT 1: PHOTO OF RESPONDENT 1’s AWARDS ................................................ 158 EXHIBIT 2: PHOTO OF RESPONDENT 2’s AWARDS ................................................ 159 vii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Transformational and Transactional Leadership .................................................... 23 Table 2.2: Some other EL Definitions ..................................................................................... 24 Table 5.1.1: Characteristics of the Respondents ..................................................................... 87 Table 5.3.1: Early Stages Challenges and current challenges of MK ................................... 101 Table 5.3.2: Early Stages Challenges and current challenges of GC .................................... 101 Table 5.3.3: Early Stages Challenges and current challenges of DA .................................... 102 Table 5.3.4: Early Stages Challenges and current challenges of AJ ..................................... 102 viii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4.1: Research Onion for the study ................................................................................ 61 ix University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AGI Association of Ghanaian Industries EL Entrepreneurial Leadership EU European Union GDP Gross Domestic Product GH¢ Ghana Cedi GIPC Ghana Investment Promotion Centre MOTI Ministry of Trade and Industry NBSSI National Board for Small Scale Industries OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development SMEs Small and Medium Enterprises UN United Nations x University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ABSTRACT The development of entrepreneurship and SMEs have greatly contributed to the economic development in many countries all over the world. This is as a result of entrepreneurial activities which provide employment, revenue for both government and citizenry, as well as serve as an avenue for innovation. The SME sector is the most dominant form of business in Ghana. In spite of the economic importance of entrepreneurship and SMEs in Ghana, their growth is hindered by several factors. These growth-hindering factors will not be challenging if entrepreneurs exhibit entrepreneurial leadership qualities, which include; innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking, visionary, and the ability to motivate employees. In view of that, this study seeks to investigate the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and SME growth in Ghana. Data is collected from a sample of transformational entrepreneurs through face-face in-depth interviews and analysed thematically. The findings of the study suggests that Ghanaian transformational entrepreneurs are entrepreneurial leaders because they exhibit traits such as innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking propensity, visionary and ability to motivate employees; and this turn leads to tremendous growth in SMEs. Also, entrepreneurial leaders invest in their human capital inputs which facilitate the firm growth in terms of the number of employees, subsidiaries, and assets as well as profitability. The study recommends that entrepreneurs of small businesses need to exhibit entrepreneurial leadership traits as well as invest in their human capital as it will help fast-track the growth process of SMEs. Future researchers can investigate quantitatively in order to provide a more accurate generalisation of the findings. xi University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.0 Introduction This chapter provides a synopsis of what this study entails. The study seeks to explore the link between entrepreneurial leadership and SME growth; while looking at the role of human capital in achieving growth. Thus, the chapter includes; background of the study, research problem and gap in literature, purpose of the study, research objectives, research questions, significance and scope of the study, proposed methodology, and chapter disposition. 1.1 Background of the Study It is an undisputed fact that the development of entrepreneurship and SMEs activities have significantly contributed to the economic development of both developed and developing countries around the globe (Calza & Goedhuys, 2016; McCann & Ortega-Argilés, 2016; Karadag, 2015; Feldman, 2014; Abor & Quartey, 2010). This can be attributed to the various roles that entrepreneurs play within their firms; serving as opinion leaders in their industries and the economy as a whole. They significantly reduce unemployment rates, create revenue for both the government and the populace, as well as serve as an avenue for innovation, hence being classified as catalyst for economic growth (Taiwo, Falohun & Agwu, 2016; Imeokparia & Ediagbonya, 2014; Cuckovic & Bartlett, 2007; Abor & Biekpe, 2005; Mensah, 2004). In this vein, entrepreneurs have been described as change agents (Buame, 2012), innovators (Nambisan & Baron, 2013), paradigm pioneers, and visionaries (Waddock & Steckler, 2016). Contextually, the most dominant form of business in Ghana is found in the SME sector (representing 92% of businesses in the economy), contributing about 70% to Ghana’s GDP, and 49% to employment (Abor & Quartey, 2010). In addition, Aryeetey (2001) proffers that 1 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh these firms provide export and tax revenues and approximately 85% of employment in the manufacturing sector. Furthermore, Frimpong (2013) added that SMEs pay a regular contribution to the socio economic development of Ghana by providing basic goods and services, as well as creating jobs. Thus, SMEs have been labelled as the seedbed for indigenous entrepreneurship (Aryeetey & Ahene, 2004); meaning, SMEs have provided a podium for homegrown private enterprises to spring in areas and industries that was generally ignored. A combination of these investments has given rise to indigenous entrepreneurship in Ghana. Although the economic importance of SMEs cannot be overlooked, they are inhibited by numerous challenges that impede their growth. Research in the Ghanaian context, has shown that SMEs encounter numerous problems most notably, inadequate financing (Oppong, Owiredu & Churchill, 2014; Abor & Biekpe, 2007; Tagoe, Nyarko, & Anuwa-Amarh, 2005), inapt management skills, inadequate marketing skills, and unfavorable government policies (Buame, 2012) among others. These challenges stifle the growth of SMEs in Ghana, thus, their contribution to Ghana’s GDP continues to reduce (Frimpong, 2013; cited in Ab Rahman, & Ramli, 2014). SMEs are also confronted with changes in the environment, as well as competition from both domestic and global peninsula; hence, it is therefore required that the revitalisation for growth is understood by the leadership of SMEs (Saeed & Ibrahim, 2016). Some scholars are of the view that the aforementioned challenges will not be as problematic if SME owners lead with entrepreneurial leadership style (Cogliser & Brigham, 2004; Bryant, 2004; Arham, Boucher & Muenjohn, 2013). For example, Kassim and Sulaiman (2011) posited that, to guarantee the growth and survival of SMEs, it is important to understand the leadership activities of entrepreneurs. The term entrepreneurial leadership was coined in the year 2000 by McGrath and MacMillan who recommended that a new type of leader is required in today’s dynamic markets where 2 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh uncertainty and competitive pressure is on the rise. They labeled this leader the “entrepreneurial leader”, this is because it takes the leader with the “entrepreneurial” attitude to take advantage of the opportunities that arise in these fast changing markets or situations in order to gain competitive advantage for their organisation faster than others. Entrepreneurial leadership as explained by some scholars such as, Kuratko (2007), Ireland, Hitt, and Sirmon (2003) and Vecchio (2003), “entails the ability to influence others to manage resources strategically in order to emphasize both opportunity-seeking and advantage-seeking behaviors”. Ireland and Webb (2007) noted that ventures that are spearheaded by entrepreneurial leaders gain competitive advantage, because they are innovative and proactive, and so enjoy first mover advantages. Also, entrepreneurial leaders are regularly inspired by their employees, hence, it is easier to instill ethical behaviors in them (Kuratko, Goldsby & Hornsby, 2004). For this reason, entrepreneurial leadership has become very crucial for businesses to stay above the waters of intense competition and survive (Kuratko, 2007). Hayton (2003) however postulates that the extent to which an entrepreneur effectively and efficiently demonstrates these leadership behaviours depend on the amount of human capital that he/she possesses. Therefore this study seeks to explore entrepreneurial leadership and its effect(s) on the growth of Ghanaian SMEs, as well as the role human capital plays in achieving this growth. 1.2 Research Gap and Problem Statement The efficacy of programs meant to grow SMEs rest on in-depth comprehension of the entrepreneur’s personal characteristics as well as his/her leadership qualities (Kuratko & Hodgetts, 2001). Frese and de Kruif (2000) noted that indeed, the survival and growth of SMEs largely depends on the entrepreneur since the major decisions of the firm are taken by the entrepreneur. Thus, in his/her absence, the business remains at a standstill. Hall (1995) and Shane (2007) observed that the major difference that exists among various SMEs can be 3 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh explained by the distinct entrepreneur and the leadership style exhibited (Ling, Simsek, Lubatkin & Veiga, 2008). Though the leadership style of entrepreneurs is important to the success of a small business (Valdiserri & Wilson, 2010), researchers noted that an understanding of their leadership behaviours is still lacking (Hernez-Broome & Hughes, 2004; Renko, El Tarabishy, Carsrud, & Brännback, 2015; Wright, Roper, Hart, & Carter, 2015). Again, although the subject of leadership has been examined in the literature, Mohd Sam et al. (2012) hold that in practice, knowledge about leadership and its impact on organisational performance is still deficient. It is therefore important for entrepreneurs to cultivate their leadership skills in order to see their firms through good and bad times (Mohd Sam et al., 2012). Arham et al. (2013) also suggest that entrepreneurs are needed to develop solid leadership behaviours in order to manage their firms irrespective of the season. They added that even in times of crisis, apt leadership of the enterprise would help employees to remain focused and be motivated. Hence, one of the driving forces for SMEs successes in the future relies heavily on a development of good leadership (Abdul Razak, 2010). This is critical because Davies et al. (2002) suggest that some of the primary factors that result in the failure of SMEs are inadequate leadership and management skills. Moreover, Eggers and Leahy (1995) believed that skills such as motivation of others, financial management, communication, vision, and self- motivation, which fall under leadership, play crucial roles in determining how quickly a small business would grow. Therefore, even though enterprises automatically call for entrepreneurship, the leadership style that exists within the organization, is the vital ingredient required for a successful enterprise (Arham et al., 2013). Furthermore, other researches have highlighted that leadership style is critical to the success of a small business (Valdiserri & Wilson, 2010), and that leaders of small businesses need to develop a better understanding of leadership in order to realize their organisational goals and 4 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh objectives (Hernez-broome & Hughes, 2004). For instance, Valdiserri and Wilson (2010), who studied 48 small businesses in and the US, discovered that the type of leadership behavior of the leader, whether they were transactional or transformational, affected the profitability and success of small businesses. Methodologically, a number of studies have quantitatively looked at the reasons for failures as well as the critical success factors among SMEs. The findings of these studies (Hung, Effendi, Talib & Rani, 2010; Beaver, 2003; Ghosh, Liang, Meng, & Chan, 2001; Perry, 2001) have been deliberated broadly. Over the years, various studies have identified the critical success factors and the reasons for failures among SMEs and the findings of these studies have been discussed broadly. Nonetheless, these factors for SMEs success/failures have been studied quantitatively, thus, Arham, Boucher and Muenjohn (2013) calls for a qualitative perspective on the characteristics of entrepreneurial leadership since it is still lacking. This study also responds to Kassim and Sulaiman’s study in 2010 which recommend that an understanding of leadership behaviours of entrepreneurs should be explored in other geographical regions. Thus, a close scrutiny of studies on SME growth in Ghana suggest that the growth of SMEs is significantly affected by some barriers due to certain external factors and firm characteristics (Yeboah, 2015; Obeng, Robson, & Haugh, 2014; Mahmoud, 2010; Kayanula & Quartey, 2000). Specifically, these studies have focused on examining the role of government (Kim, 2011), financial institutions (Anane, Cobbinah, & Manu, 2013), policy environment (Kayanula & Quartey, 2000), political and socio-cultural environment (Kheni, Dainty & Gibb, 2007), technological infrastructure (Owusu-Frimpong & Mmieh, 2007) and market orientation (Mahmoud, 2010); while very few studies have considered the internal factor (i.e. leadership) and its impact on SME growth. Kheni et al. (2007) also postulate that the performance of SMEs is still not commanding though some of the factors addressed in 5 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh previous studies have improved over the years. There is, therefore, the need to study the growth of SMEs from a different perspective. Hence, this research seeks to fill the three gaps, namely; issue, methodological and contextual gaps by exploring entrepreneurial leadership and whether or not it influences the growth of SMEs in Ghana. Some researchers have also identified a general problem stating that SMEs are stagnated in their business operations and not growing as expected (Kwaning, Nyantakyi & Kyereh, 2015; Yeboah, 2015; Manu, 1998). This could account for the reason why most SMEs do not progress into large businesses as observed by Villars (2006). Interestingly, the government and non- governmental institutions has deployed support programs to promote and sustain their development. It has however been worrisome that in spite of all the support from government and non-governmental institutions, Ghanaian SMEs are not growing as required and their contribution to GDP is gradually dwindling (Frimpong, 2013). It is therefore uncertain is whether or not SMEs are beneficiaries of governmental and non- governmental support remains unclear. It is also uncertain what is actually causing SMEs stagnation, and if leadership affects SMEs growth. These remain investable issues the researcher deems fit. Therefore, the study seeks to explore entrepreneurial leadership and its effect on SME growth. To this end, an empirical study exploring how Ghanaian SMEs understand the concept of entrepreneurial leadership, the role of human capital in achieving SME growth, the challenges faced by entrepreneurial leaders in achieving SME growth, and the effect(s) of entrepreneurial leadership on SME growth constitute the focus of the study. 1.3 Research Purpose The purpose of this research, therefore, is to understand (through the following research objectives), the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and SME growth, by drawing lessons from transformational entrepreneurs in Ghana. 6 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 1.4 Research Objectives This thesis seeks to achieve the following objectives: I. To explore how Ghanaian entrepreneurs understand the concept of entrepreneurial leadership. II. To examine the role of human capital in achieving SME growth. III. To identify the challenges faced by entrepreneurial leaders in achieving SME growth. IV. To evaluate the effect(s) of entrepreneurial leadership on SME growth. 1.5 Significance of the Study This research explores entrepreneurial leadership, the challenges associated with it, the role of human capital and the effect(s) of entrepreneurial leadership on SME growth; hence its importance from a developing country’s perspective. According to Boateng (2014), the significance of any research can be viewed along research, practice and policy strands. Hence, the significance of this study is divided in relation to the three strands stated above. In relation to academia, this research seeks to contribute toward extant literature on entrepreneurial leadership, and narrowly complements the discourse about the understanding of entrepreneurial leadership and SME growth from a Ghanaian perspective. It also tries to fill the ambiguities in the literature by providing a detailed understanding of entrepreneurial leadership and SME growth in Ghana; and also serve as a basis for future research; since gaps for future research will be identified. Also, the findings of this study is an eye-opener for Ghanaian entrepreneurs as it enables them appreciate the importance of entrepreneurial leadership and human capital in achieving SME growth, and also serve as a blueprint for Ghanaian entrepreneurs and SMEs in general. 7 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh This study also enables policy makers develop strategies that will encourage Ghanaian entrepreneurs to invest in human capital and also adopt entrepreneurial leadership behaviours among Ghanaian SMEs. 1.6 Scope of the Study The study revolves around the concept of entrepreneurial leadership in Ghana with emphasis on transformational entrepreneurs in the Greater Accra Region. This is because some of these enterprises operated by transformational entrepreneurs are found in the region, and the researcher can easily access them. Although entrepreneurial leadership is not limited to business owners, the study will concentrate on (business) owners of ‘transformed’ SMEs in Ghana. This will enable the researcher understand the growth process of these enterprises and ascertain whether entrepreneurial leadership has a part to play. The researcher aims to also glean some lessons (if any) for Ghanaian SMEs to adopt in order to accelerate their growth process. 1.7 Chapter Disposition This study will be organized into six chapters. The first chapter provides a synopsis of the research. It gives a brief study background, problem statement, goal of the study, research objectives, and questions, significance and scope of the research, limitations of the study and the chapter synopsis of the research. Chapter two focuses on a review of relevant literature including areas such as; the overview of entrepreneurship and leadership, entrepreneurial leadership and its attributes, and the human capital (theory) of an entrepreneur. 8 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Chapter three entails the context of study which covers the brief overview of Ghana, the history of SMEs in Ghana, its definition, importance and challenges that affect SME growth in Ghana. Also, an overview of the firms led by entrepreneurial leaders is provided in this chapter. Chapter four provides the outline of the methodology used in this study. These include the research approach, research design, research strategy, research method, data collection, analysis tools and techniques. Chapter five entails the data analysis, findings and discussion of the study. Chapter six being the last chapter of the study, encapsulates a summary of research findings, conclusions, as well as r3ecommend suggestions for future research. References, appendices and exhibits follow this chapter. 9 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 2.0 Introduction This chapter examines relevant literature in the area of entrepreneurial leadership. It further provides an understanding of the concept and its related issues, as well as explore its relationship with SME growth. 2.1 Evolution and definition of Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship is the new trend that constantly transforms the environment within which businesses operates. According to Veeraraghavan (2009), the word “entrepreneurship” originates from the French verb, “entreprendre”, and the German word “unternehmen”, both meaning to “undertake”. Buame (2012) explains that in prehistoric times, an entrepreneur referred to an intermediary who established trade routes between a manufacturer and the final consumer. An example of an entrepreneur in that era was individuals like Marco Polo. By the Middle Ages, however, the term entrepreneur evolved to describe a person or actor who was in charge of large production projects. Ironically, this understanding of an entrepreneur did not include the need to take risks. Instead, the entrepreneur had to manage the project with the available resources that the government provided. In that time, entrepreneurs were responsible for large production projects including the construction of cathedrals, castles, public buildings, among others (Buame, 2012). In the 17th century, however, risk was linked to entrepreneurship, because Richard Cantillon (a renowned economist) observed that sole proprietors “buy at a certain price and sell at an uncertain price, thus operating at a risk.” He, therefore, concluded that entrepreneurs are risk-takers because the uncertain price at which the sole proprietors may sell the goods may result in either a profit or loss. 10 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The global industrialisation in the 18th century necessitated a clarification on the distinction between an entrepreneur and a venture capitalist. The entrepreneur is the person in need of capital, and the venture capitalist is the capital provider. Thomas Edison and Eli Whitney are examples of entrepreneurs at the time. According to Buame (2012; p.18), “a venture capitalist is a professional money manager who makes risks investments from a pool of equity capital to obtain a high rate of return on the investments.” Other scholars are also of the view that there is a distinction between small business owners and entrepreneurs. They argued that the distinguishing feature is; entrepreneurs were risk-takers, innovative and change-oriented as well as preserved higher achievement motivation. On the other hand, small business owners were indifferent about innovation; however, their primary concern was accruing income for their basic requirements (Garland, Hoy, Boulton & Garand, 1984; Steward, Watson, Carland & Carland, 1998). This assertion is confirmed by Quaye and Acheampong (2013), who assert that those who set up SMEs in Ghana are not innovative, hence they should be referred to as ‘owner-managers’ and not ‘entrepreneurs’. In the 19th and 20th centuries, it was established that the entrepreneur is an innovator. Entrepreneurship by then was identified as the process where an individual or a group of individuals referred to as “entrepreneurs” carried out new combinations referred to as “enterprise” (Schumpeter, 1942). Schumpeter (1942) posited that an entrepreneur is anyone who introduces something new to the economy. Such new things may be in the form of products, markets, different methods of production, diverse sources of supply/raw material, different ways of management, or innovative ideas (Buame, 2012; Schumpeter, 1942). Similarly, Drucker (1970) also acknowledged ‘entrepreneurship’ as a change orienting activity which indicates that entrepreneurship is an iterative process made up of undertakings, right from the inception of a new business, organization, or activity. An entrepreneur is, therefore, anyone who actually looks for change, reacts to it, and takes advantage of change as an 11 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh opportunity. For this reason, proactiveness is one attribute of an entrepreneur. Thus, for an activity to be classified as entrepreneurial, it must be characterised by proactiveness (i.e. undertaking profitable new business ventures), risk taking, as well as innovation (National Knowledge Commission, 2008). Similarly, Bygrave and Hofer (1991) defined entrepreneurship as a process that encompasses all the activities, functions, and actions related to the perception of pursuing opportunities and creating novel organizations (Bygrave & Hofer, 1991). In its simplest form, entrepreneurship is explained by Johnson (2001, p. 138) to “involve capturing ideas, converting them into products and, or services and then building a venture to take the product to market”. It is evident from the above paragraphs that there has been much evolution in the meaning of the term ‘entrepreneurship’, and even currently, there remains little agreement on the definition of entrepreneurship. Buame (2012) posits that there are disparities in the definition of entrepreneurship largely because entrepreneurship is widespread and covers a number of disciplines. To the sociologist, entrepreneurship is the process of generating income from property and other personal assets; while to the psychologist, entrepreneurship is the situation where an individual asserts his/her independence and has control over his/her life (i.e. own locus of control). In management, entrepreneurship is seen as an organising process where existing resources are re-organised to achieve a predetermined goal, among others. Other scholars have also proposed that entrepreneurship can be defined depending on the context in which it is practised (Hansemark, 1998; Siegel & Renko, 2012). Thus, for this research, the study adopts Buame’s (2012) definition of entrepreneurship because it encapsulates all the core elements that describe entrepreneurship irrespective of the form it takes. He defined entrepreneurship as “an innovative process where a prospective individual 12 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh (or a group of individuals) identifies and seizes opportunity (be it an idea, or business); organises existing resources to convert those opportunities into workable/marketable products or services; thus by adding value through time, efforts, money, or skills for the benefit of society; assumes the risks of the competitive marketplace to implement these ideas; and realises the rewards from these efforts” (Buame, 2012; p. 31). 2.2 Types of Entrepreneurship There are several types of entrepreneurship, which various scholars’ group under different headings. For instance, Veeraraghavan (2009) labelled them as “Opportunity-based entrepreneurship’ and “Necessity-based entrepreneurship”. The situation whereby an entrepreneur perceives a viable business prospect and decides to practice it as an established profession is referred to as opportunity based entrepreneurship. On the other hand, the necessity based entrepreneurship describes a situation in which an entrepreneur is forced to engage in entrepreneurship because there is lack of viable choices to make a living of them (Veeraraghavan, 2009). In this instance, the entrepreneur chooses entrepreneurship as a career against his/her will because there is no other choice left. In spite of the above classification of entrepreneurship, Veeraraghavan (2009) realized that a new type of entrepreneurship is springing up. He noted that this type of entrepreneurship is pursued by people who want to be independent as a result of dissatisfaction from working for others (probably due to lower income earning or negative work experiences). Such individuals become entrepreneurs because they are more likely to bear the uncertainty that typifies new ventures. Again, Aulet and Murray (2013) also classified entrepreneurship into innovation-driven entrepreneurship and small business entrepreneurship. Innovation-driven entrepreneurship is the term that explains the process of creating and delivering state-of-the-art innovations to customers. The innovations mean ideas (either in the technical, market, or business model 13 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh domain) that are entirely new to the world and have a clear competitive advantage as well as high growth potential. The enterprises that take advantage of international opportunities are known as “innovation-driven enterprises” (IDEs) (Aulet & Murray, 2013). They further explain that being innovation driven is very important since it highlights the need to create competitive advantage, which the entrepreneur can achieve by doing “new combinations” (Schumpeter, 1934). That is, an entrepreneur has to do something unique by adding value to the already existing resources (Aulet & Murray, 2013). The term “innovation-driven” is preferred over “technology-driven” entrepreneurship because innovation is not limited to technology, though enabled by it. Innovation comes in diverse forms encompassing technology, business models, processes, and mPidegree (from Ghana), among others (Aulet & Murray, 2013). Some of the most exciting innovations in this era include Google, Netflix, iTunes, Zipcar, among others. These innovations are primarily, business model innovations. The second type of entrepreneurship is the small business entrepreneurship. Aulet and Murray (2013) explain that this type of entrepreneurship creates “small and medium enterprises” (SMEs). These enterprises normally run long-established business ideas, face limited competitive advantage, and usually serve the domestic markets. Thus, the prosperity of the entrepreneur (operating an SME) depends on his/her business acumen, his/her ability to execute a project, and the current local demand, however, (s)he is not confronted by the multifaceted set of risks (i.e. technical, market, and business) that face the innovation driven entrepreneur. As mentioned earlier, SMEs are the lifeblood of many economies (Aulet & Murray, 2012). In the United States, for instance, self-employment and SME creation are the necessary ways of moving people out of unemployment in hard times. SMEs also form majority of employment in Spain. SMEs are particularly suitable for individuals with relatively low levels of education and skills, although these enterprises also can generate (few) jobs for skilled professionals. In 14 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh a period where employees are laid off, SMEs offer these workers the opportunity to work and exploit their skills independently. Aulet and Murray (2013) postulate that in Europe, SMEs provide employment for the founder, spouse and an average of four employees (who are normally family members). Comparing SMEs to either large established firms or Innovation-Driven Enterprises, SMEs provide below- the-average wages and poor benefits. Although “small businesses” are not essentially work manufacturers (Aulet & Murray, 2012), Stangler and Litan (2009) reports that according to the Kauffman Foundation, the American economy (between 1980 and 2005) realized that majority of the 40 million net new jobs were created by companies not older than five years old (new companies). 2.3 Types of Entrepreneurs Schoar (2010) identified two different groups of entrepreneurs; i.e. subsistence entrepreneurs and transformational entrepreneurs. Subsistence Entrepreneurs Subsistence entrepreneurs are people who turn out to be entrepreneurs as a way of providing subsistence income i.e. income that can sustain them for a period of time. Gamberoni, Heath and Nix (2013) also define subsistence entrepreneurs as those who turn to self-employment solely to provide income that will sustain themselves and their families. In most developing countries (such as India, China, as well as many African countries, of which Ghana is no exception) almost all the entrepreneurs are subsistence entrepreneurs. They are characterized by running small operations that neither evolve into large companies nor provide job opportunities for extra people in the economy (Schoar, 2010). At best, subsistence entrepreneurs simply provide alternative work opportunities for themselves and possibly, their 15 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh family members (Schoar, 2010; Decker, Haltiwanger, Jarmin & Miranda, 2014). This claim is confirmed when Hurst and Pugsley (2011) found that in the US economy, a lot of young and small business owners’ motivation for starting business was for non-monetary reasons such as time flexibility or personal goals, and therefore have no aspirations for high growth. Gamberoni et al., (2013) adds that these entrepreneurs choose to be independent owing to lack of wage jobs or lack of skills necessary for wage jobs. Transformational Entrepreneurs Transformational entrepreneurs, on the other hand, are those entrepreneurs, whose ambition is to create large, vibrant businesses that develop faster and further than the scope of a person’s subsistence needs, thus providing jobs and income for others (Schoar, 2010). These entrepreneurs establish businesses with the goal and ability to grow and create jobs for others (Gamberoni et al., 2013). Though transformational entrepreneurs start small businesses like their counterparts, have the intention of innovating and growing, in order to create work for other people and introducing additional value into the economic system. Because they are scarce and uncommon, investors and policy makers in an economy often have a hard time identifying transformational entrepreneurs (Decker et al, 2014). They explain that transformational entrepreneurs build large companies so that it will develop rapidly if put in a benign environment. Thus, in the competitive marketplace, only a fraction of these transformational entrepreneurs succeed and grow to their full potential (Schoar, 2010). In addition, transformational entrepreneurs also create jobs for others through their expansion processes and are therefore regarded by Decker et al. (2014) as the “true engines” of economic growth in any nation. Hence, when discussing the importance of entrepreneurs in employment creation and productivity growth, the emphasis lies on transformational entrepreneurs and not merely subsistence entrepreneurs (Schoar, 2010). 16 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Ghana suffers a lot from increasing unemployment rate, and since transformational entrepreneurs are the “true engines” of economic growth (Decker et al., 2014), it is expedient to understand Ghanaian transformational entrepreneurs as this research seeks to draw lessons from them to help the majority of subsistence entrepreneurs in Ghana grow beyond what they intended. 2.4 Schools of Thoughts in Entrepreneurship Though there is a growing and intense interest in entrepreneurship, there are a number of inconsistencies in defining entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship due to the differences in people’s ideologies and schools of thought. Entrepreneurship has been classified into six possible schools of thought by Cunningham and Lischeron (1991), who posit that the concept may be classified as follows: classical school, great persons’ school, intrapreneurship school, psychological school, management school, and leadership school of thought. These schools of thought cement the argument that there is a lack of consensus on who actually an entrepreneur is, and what s/he does. 2.4.1 The Classical School The classical school of thought is believed to be the oldest school of thought in entrepreneurship since it emerged in the 16th century. This school of thought believes that people who take military risks or expeditions are entrepreneurs. The classical school of thought further expands that these entrepreneurs are creative dreamers; i.e. people who can visualize where they will be in some years to come (Buame, 2012). In other words, they are passionate people who have dreams for change in the communities. 17 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.4.2 The ‘Great Persons’ School This school of thought seeks to answer the question “Are entrepreneurs (like leaders) born or are they made?” As explained by Buame (2012), the debate in this school poses whether or not an individual comes into the world carrying with the inborn natural ability to perform entrepreneurially, or learn? According to the great persons’ school, an entrepreneur is a person who has an intuitive ability (Zaman, 2013). This school believes that entrepreneurs have certain traits or characteristics that naturally distinguish them from other people (Buame, 2012; Garfield, 1986; Hughes, 1986; Silver, 1985). This is because their ideas, concepts and drives are interesting, intriguing and thought-provoking. 2.4.3 The Intrapreneurship School According to Zaman (2013), this school states that entrepreneurial abilities and skills can be developed and harnessed in an organization. The intrapreneurship school is concerned about operating within an existing organization and presenting fresh and innovative ideas, and creating new units to develop new markets, products, and services. In other words, the intrapreneurship school proposes that one does not need to start a new business to be an entrepreneur; however, the qualities of an entrepreneur can be deployed in an existing firm to bring about change in that organization. One aspect of intrapreneurial activity, therefore, is being attentive to opportunities. Buame (2012) also noted that the intrapreneurship school originated to address the dearth of innovativeness and competitiveness within firms. Thus, innovativeness can be achieved when employees are encouraged to work as entrepreneurs in semi-autonomous units. In addition, Buame (2012) noted that intrapreneurs need not own an enterprise but rather possess discretionary freedom to function as entrepreneurs as well as execute their ideas although not owners in themselves. 18 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.4.4 The Psychological School Sprouting from the psychology discipline (i.e. the study of human behaviour), the psychological school of thought believes that certain factors drive people to undertake entrepreneurial actions. These factors include individual needs, people’s drive for power and/or recognition (Buame, 2012). Cunningham and Lischeron (1991) also claim that the psychological school sees an entrepreneur as an individual who has some internal coerces that guide him. The entrepreneur must therefore possess some distinctive values, attributes, attitudes, and needs that will push him/her to act in a way that lives up to these values and satisfies his/her needs. These values include honesty, uprightness, and being ethical and dependable, among others. 2.4.5 The Management School Cunningham and Lischeron (1991) propose that this school of thought view entrepreneurs as organizers with an economic motive; they own and do organization, management and assumption of all risks associated with their ventures. Again, the management school theorizes that an entrepreneur is one “who organizes and manages a business undertaking, assuming the risk for the sake of profit” (Websters, 1966). This school of thought is of the view that anyone who manages or organizes a commercial enterprise and bears the risk can be defined as an entrepreneur. John Stuart Mill also noted that the entrepreneur does not only take risks, but also performs other functions such as supervision, control, and providing direction. Buame (2012) also included other functions such as the development of business plans, analysis of opportunities, attaining resources and working towards the organizational objectives and goals. He further posits that in the management school, entrepreneurship is part of a system of cultured activities that highlight the fundamental operations of a firm. 19 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.4.6 The Leadership School This school believes that entrepreneurs are leaders who rely on others to achieve organizational goals and objectives. It also suggests that entrepreneurs are leaders who are able to identify and recognize the needs of their subordinates and alter their style of leadership depending on the requests of the people and the status quo (Zaman, 2013). Hence, an accomplished entrepreneur should be an effective leader, a caring manager and/or mentor playing a significant role in motivating, and leading people. It goes beyond personal traits and styles in relating with others; in that, the entrepreneur’s role can be a central reference for change and indoctrinating values and skills (i.e. preserving organizational intimacy, empowering people and developing a human resource system). The leadership school, therefore, opines that entrepreneurs are natural leaders, but it is essential to recognize that not all leaders are essentially entrepreneurs. 2.5 Leadership The criticality of leadership in every economic, political, or organizational construct cannot be overstated (Barrow, 1977; Fiedler, 1996). Research especially in the behavioral sciences on the subject is therefore significantly comprehensive (Parris & Peachey, 2013), and its crucial role in the success or failure of any organization is not to be taken for granted. Thus, it is very important to understand the critical factor (i.e. leaders) that influences the success of an organization. According to Northouse (2007), leadership can be defined as a process of influencing people and guiding them to achieve organisational goals. Some scholars further postulate that leadership is more of a skill that can be used to motivate followers in the organization to work committedly towards identified goals (Barrow 1977; Parris & Peachey, 2013; Plsek & Wilson 2001; Cyert 2006). As suggested by Jaiswal and Dhar (2015), a leader’s primary concern is to encourage creativity among his workers in order to achieve innovative results. Additionally, he or she seeks to create 20 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh enthusiasm, especially by inspiring workers with a vision and thus providing all that they need to achieve the most they possibly can (Chan, 2010). Again, scholars concur that a good leader enhances the performance of the firm (Ogbanna & Harris, 2000; Tarabishy et al., 2005; Yang, 2009), and increases employees’ satisfaction and motivation (Papalexandris & Galanaki, 2009). Additionally, Banutu-Gomez and Banutu-Gomez (2007), and Kotter (2001) posit that truly great leaders work around a vision in order to guide their organizations into new directions, by creating a vision, articulating it to the followers, building a shared vision, and finally, crafting a path to achieve the vision. According to Schneider (1987), the people within an organisation are vital to building a successful organization. These include both the followers as well as the leaders. Bass and Bass (2008) developed theories of leadership to help explain, organize and simplify the complexity of the nature of leadership and its outcomes. Valdiserri and Wilson (2010) discovered two kinds of leadership behaviours that contribute to the profitability and success of small businesses (i.e. transactional and transformational). Transactional leadership refers to the type of leadership where the leader performs his/her duties within the boundaries of the organization and obeys the rules and regulations to the letter. Also, transactional leaders place prominence on work standards and task-oriented aims (Burns, 1978). On the other hand, Eyal and Kark (2004) explain transformational leadership as a type of leadership where the leader influences his followers by inspiring, empowering and coaching them to improve their devotion, loyalty, excitement and enthusiasm. Gupta, MacMillan, and Surie (2004) posit that transformational leadership has some similarities with entrepreneurial leadership, since both emphasize the ability of a leader to have positive impact on motivation and performance of subordinates. A transactional leadership style tends to view an economic means of exchange as the relationship between the leader and his followers (Tarabishy et al., 2005). Thus, that style of 21 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh leadership is based on the leader setting forth his expectations of his followers, and adjusting reward or punishment dependent on how well employees measure up against the leaders’ expectations (Ensley, Pearce & Hmieleski, 2006). Such leaders adhere to existing rules and regulations, and lay undue emphasis on work standards and task-oriented aims (Burns, 1978), and seek to provide extrinsic motivation for the employees (Ensley et al., 2006).Transactional leaders emphasize power authority and control, as they reach their goals rewarding or punishing subordinates in the style of a transaction (Jogulu, 2010; Gupta et al., 2004). It also resembles a transaction in that there is an underlying principle of exchange in which the leader is the main player (Gupta et al., 2004), rather than an inspirational format for leadership. On the other hand, however, transformational leadership seeks to motivate the followers so that they work for inspirational goals and the organizational vision (Wofford & Goodwin, 1994), attaining self-actualization by reinforcing their beliefs about themselves (Wang et al., 2012). In other words, the leader is able to motivate subordinates to perform excellently by focusing on their deeply-held personal values and intrinsic rather than extrinsic motivations (Gupta et al., 2004). This perspective is an evolution from the transactional leadership approach, as discussed above. Researchers hold that, unlike the transactional approach, transformational leadership is founded on four interrelated aspects: Idealized influence, Inspirational motivation, Intellectual stimulation, and Individualized consideration (Avolio & Bass, 2004; Bass, 1985; Seltzer & Bass, 1990; Chung-Wen, 2008). These encompass how the leader is able to provide a vision and values for his subordinates, inspiring them to think creatively, and providing personal attention to them in order to let them achieve the high levels of expectations from them (Bass, 1985; Seltzer & Bass, 1990; Matzler, Schwarz, Deutinger & Harms, 2008). Table 2.1 summarizes the distinction between transformational leadership and transactional leadership. 22 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 2.1: Transformational and Transactional Leadership Characteristics Transformational Leadership Transactional Leadership leaders gain compliance inspiring, empowering and exchange of rewards by coaching appeals stimulate intrinsic motivation extrinsic motivation appeals focus on organizational and “common self-interest good” interests type of planned change major organizational changes routine changes Table adopted from Hitt et al. (2005): 394. Extant literature suggests that transformational leadership has some similarities with entrepreneurial leadership, since both emphasize the ability of a leader to have positive impact on motivation and performance of subordinates (Gupta et al. 2004). They, however, noted that the entrepreneurial leaders’ ability to evoke followers’ performance is based on the organization’s need to adapt the changing environment (ibid). Also, the main challenge for the entrepreneurial leader is to create the willingness in followers and organizations to carry out creative entrepreneurial actions rather than copy current conservative activities (Gupta et al., 2004; Mokhber, Tan, Vakilbashi, Zamil, & Basiruddin, 2016). 2.6 Entrepreneurial Leadership Entrepreneurial leadership is a term that was coined in 2000 by McGrath & MacMillan who suggested that a unique type of leader is necessary for organizational success in increasingly dynamic markets with so much uncertainty and pressure from the competition. The leader required had to be an "entrepreneurial leader", who would be able to take advantage of fast- changing markets and situations so as to gain a competitive edge in the market. Such leadership entails the ability to influence others to strategically manage resources in order to seek both opportunities and advantages for the firm (Ireland, Hitt, & Sirmon, 2003; Kuratko, 2007; Vecchio, 2003). This definition draws insights both from entrepreneurship (Stevenson & Jarrillo-Mossi, 1986) and leadership (Yukl, 2002). Wang, Tee & Ahmed (2012), explain further that the definition projects entrepreneurship as a process which involves the desire and ability 23 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh to recognize and pursue an opportunity, while highlighting leadership as “the process of influencing others to understand and agree about what needs to be done and how it can be done effectively, and the process of facilitating individual and collective efforts to accomplish a shared objective” (Yukl 2002, p. 3). Alternative definitions of entrepreneurial leadership have been compiled in Table 2.2 below: Table 2.2: Some other EL Definitions Author(s) Year Entrepreneurial leadership definition Gupta, MacMillan & Surie 2004 Leadership that creates visionary scenarios that are used to assemble and mobilize a “supporting cast” of participants who become committed by the vision to the discovery and exploitation of strategic value creation. Thornberry 2006 Leadership requires passion, vision, focus, and the ability to inspire others. Entrepreneurial leadership requires all these, plus a mindset and skill set that helps entrepreneurial leaders identify, develop, and capture new business opportunities. Surie & Ashley 2008 Leadership capable of sustaining innovation and adaptation in high velocity and uncertain environments. Goossen & Stevens 2013 It can be defined as that type of leadership which provides for the scenarios where committed followers are gathered to be led by the vision of the leader towards finding new opportunities and utilising them for sustainable success and value for the organization. Dover, Hariharan, & 2014 A process that creates value for organizational Cummings stakeholders by bringing together a unique innovation package of resources to respond to a recognized opportunity. Yu & Kwan 2015 It can be defined as that style of leadership which leads an entrepreneur to take risks, be proactive and be innovative. It also involves organizing and conducting the plans. Renko, Tarabishy, Carsrud & 2015 Entrepreneurial leadership entails influencing Brännback and directing the performance of group members toward the achievement of organizational goals that involve recognizing and exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities. Source: Author’s own Gupta et al. (2004) noted that the above definitions imply that entrepreneurial leaders are confronted with two challenges: the leadership challenge and the entrepreneurial challenge. 24 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The leadership challenge concerns the issue of having to persuade both the employees and a firm’s other stakeholders that it is possible to assemble sufficient resources to accomplish the necessary objectives while transforming people who are used to transactional relationships. Meanwhile, the entrepreneurial challenge consists of envisioning and creating a range of potential opportunities that may be exploited to revolutionize the followers and the firm, even in light of resource constraints (Gupta et al., 2004). In simple terms, Wang, Tee and Ahmed (2012) posit that entrepreneurial leadership requires that the leader possess an ability to identify opportunities for change and be entrepreneurial, as well as the ability most related to leadership, to motivate other people and mobilize the necessary resources to make real change happen. Therefore, an entrepreneurial leader can be described as a leader who is able to explore his/her environment, identify which potentials can be capitalized upon, and is then able to persuade others to enthusiastically participate in the process of creating new value (Wang et al., 2012). Ventures that are spearheaded by entrepreneurial leaders are innovative and proactive, so they enjoy first mover advantages which put them ahead in the competitive marketplace (Ireland & Webb, 2007). Also, entrepreneurial leaders are regularly inspire their employees, hence, it is easier to instill ethical behaviors in them (Kuratko, Goldsby & Hornsby, 2004). 2.7 The five attributes of Entrepreneurial Leadership As discussed earlier, entrepreneurial leadership is the convergence of entrepreneurship and leadership literature. Thus, the dimensions of entrepreneurial leadership include some entrepreneurship and leadership dimensions. They are innovativeness, proactiveness, risk- taking, visionary and motivation (Chen, 2007). Below are the detailed discussions of these dimensions or characteristics. 25 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.7.1 Innovativeness The importance of innovation in the entrepreneurial process was emphasized by Schumpeter (1942; 1934), who outlined an economic process of “creative destruction.” He elaborated that creative destruction is the situation where wealth is created by revolutionizing existing market structures by introducing radically new goods or services which are able to shift resources away from existing firms and thus, allow new firms to grow. Schumpeter (1934) held that such entrepreneurship, or “the competitive entry of innovative new combinations", is what has propelled the dynamic evolution of the economy. Through such discussions, innovativeness has come to be known as an integral aspect of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurs are therefore seen as innovators who drive the transformation of the economy (Schumpeter, 1934). Lumpkin and Dess (1996), supported by Covin and Miles (1999), posit that innovativeness is a reflection of a firm's engagement in, and support of, new ideas, experimentation, and creativity much earlier than the competition, which would lead to novel products, services or production processes. Other scholars have explained that innovativeness is the propensity to creatively initiate and support new ideas and processes to engender new products, services, technological processes, or new markets (Kropp & Zolin, 2005; Li et al., 2008; Mengue & Auh 2006; Miller & Friesen, 1982). Hage (1980) noted that although innovations might differ in how radical they are, some researchers are of the view that the fundamental assumption of innovation is a departure from extant technologies or practices in order to progress beyond what is currently known as ‘state of the art’ (Kimberly, 1981; Baker & Sinkula, 2009). Thus, innovativeness is synonymous to the creation of something new. Moreover, Garcia and Calantone (2002) differentiate ‘innovation’ from ‘innovativeness.’ Since innovation is explained as a repetitive process that is commenced by the sensitivity of a new 26 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh market and/or service opportunity for a technology-based invention, which subsequently results in tasks striving for the commercial success of the invention (OECD, 1991), Garcia and Calantone (2002) identify two important distinctions from innovativeness: i) the ‘innovation’ process encompasses the technological development of an invention, combined with the market introduction of that invention to end-users through adoption and diffusion, as well as ii) the innovation process is iterative in nature and thus, automatically includes the first introduction of a new innovation and the reintroduction of an improved innovation. ‘Innovativeness’ on the other hand, rather measures how new an innovation is (Garcia & Calantone, 2002). Thus, highly innovative products have a higher degree of newness, and vice versa. The assessment of newness is dependent on the researcher and what (s)he deems as new. For instance, some consider what is new to the world (Song & Montoya-Weiss, 1998) as new; while others think what is new to the adopting unit (Ettlie & Rubenstein, 1987) is new. Again, some researchers believe that if something is new to the industry (O’Connor, 1998), or new to the market (Kleinschmidt & Cooper, 1991; Meyers & Tucker, 1989), or new to the consumer (Atuahene- Gima, 1995), is rather ‘new’. Innovation has been classified in several ways (Downs & Mohr, 1976) however; the utmost distinction has been between product-market innovation and technological innovation. Till date, a number of studies have focused on technological innovativeness, which fundamentally involves product and process development, with a strong focus on technical expertise and industry knowledge (Cooper, 1973; Maidique & Patch, 1982). On the other hand, product- innovativeness lays emphasis on the design of the product, and its subsequent market research, advertising and promotion (Miller & Friesen, 1982; Scherer, 1980) in order to influence its performance on the market. Lumpkin and Dess (1996), however, posit that it is difficult to differentiate between these general classifications of innovativeness, as innovativeness normally represents a combination of both types of innovation. Either way, innovativeness has 27 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh been pinpointed as a crucial component of entrepreneurial leadership. Chen (2007) explains innovativeness as the entrepreneurs’ ability to enhance creative thinking in the team, welcoming new ideas. Therefore, innovativeness involves the entrepreneurial leader motivating his/her team to commit to creatively achieving entrepreneurial goals. A number of studies have established the relationship between certain leadership styles and organizational innovation. Transformational and entrepreneurial leadership have been found to positively influence the performance of R&D project teams (Keller, 1992), team innovation (Greenberger & Sexton, 1988), and organizational innovation (Jung, Chow & Wu, 2003). Thus, members of top management actually influence the development and implementation of new products when they provide the type of leadership which inspires and encourages innovation. Leaders can either prevent the introduction of new ideas, stifling creative potential (Andrews & Farris, 1967), or they can stimulate the desired innovation (Oldham & Cummings, 1996; Jung et al., 2003). Creativity has many faces, and it may be found in a wide variety of contexts. The concept is believed to be the confluence of knowledge, creative thinking, and motivation. More than just the idea, therefore, innovation is putting a creative idea to work. Innovation may thus be considered to be harnessing creative energy into a valuable outcome. An idea does not become an innovation until is put into motion. An innovative entrepreneur, therefore, does not only have the idea but puts it through the mill in action in the business, in order to demonstrate his/her entrepreneurism. These innovations are differentiated from inventions in that they are successfully applied rather than just made manifest (McKeown, 2008). The innovations must also present new ways of doing things, representing incremental, radical, and revolutionary changes in thinking, products, processes, or organizations, thus differing from existing ones. 28 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Finally, unless these innovations align with organizational vision and goals, their impact will remain minimal. As pointed out by Taylor and Schroeder (2003), innovation should cut costs and maximize productivity. While “mass innovation” has become the order of the day, presenting unprecedented potentials for organizations to grow, larger firms still struggle with implementing innovations. Nooteboom (1994) observes that small firms are more likely to adopt innovations compared to their larger counterparts because they are more flexible and less bureaucratic. This is beneficial because scholars have highlighted that the adoption of innovative activities enable SMEs perform better than their counterparts, who do not adopt innovation (Freel 2000; Vermeulen, De Jong, & O'shaughnessy, 2005; Westerberg & Wincent 2008; Qian & Li 2003; Verhees & Meulenberg 2004). Younger and smaller organizations are therefore leveraging on innovative breakthroughs to find novel and unique solutions, leading to better economic performance, higher growth, more jobs created, and higher wages for employees (Sirelli, 2000). Indeed, the current economic crises may actually yield benefits in that it may inspire innovation within organizations (Day, 2007; Schoemaker, 2008). This would only hold if, in addition to technology and manpower, a competent and entrepreneurial leader would foster innovation. Such a leader would directly address the company’s growth gap, exploring several possibilities and daring to enter unexplored areas which would ultimately reap huge payoffs. Such a leader should be willing to face the risks involved and suffer some failures in the process, in order to benefit from the ultimate success. 29 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.7.2 Proactiveness Proactiveness means "taking initiative by anticipating and pursuing new opportunities related to future demand and by participating in emerging markets" (Lumpkin & Dess 1996, p. 146). Schillo (2011) too explained proactiveness as a unique entrepreneurial activity to that enables entrepreneurs to act before forthcoming projections are made in terms of products, consumer demand, markets and/or technologies. Other scholars are also of the view that proactiveness includes the entrepreneur’s ability to predict trends while searching for opportunities in order to create changes in the environment. By so doing, new products and services are introduced in the environment (Boohene et al, 2012; Alembummah, 2015). Likewise, Rauch et al. (2009, p.763) are of the view that proactiveness refers to "an opportunity seeking, forward-looking perspective characterized by the introduction of new products and services ahead of the competitions and acting in anticipation of future demand". Chen (2007) explain proactiveness as the entrepreneurs’ ability to encourage entrepreneurial initiatives that nurture and support innovation. The leader, therefore, has the option to whether or not tackle the ambiguity and accept responsibility for the repercussions. Mokhber, et al., (2016) also believe that practiveness constitutes inspiring entrepreneurial initiatives among team members, as well as nurturing innovativeness and creativity among them. Thus, proactiveness represents the ability of the entrepreneurial leader to promote entrepreneurial initiatives that will improve the firm’s competitive advantages. Again, other scholars indicate that a company’s alertness and reaction to signs and trends in the marketplace is shown by their proactiveness (Hughes & Morgan, 2007), hence, it is imperative for any business to become a pioneer, if only they intend to capitalize on market opportunities (Bleeker, 2011). As a forerunner, a proactive business enjoys certain first mover advantages such as high returns, and a lead in establishing a unique brand identification (ibid). In the same vein, Lumpkin and Dess (1996, p.147) proffer that leadership is related to 30 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh proactiveness, in that, a proactive firm “has the will and foresight to seize new opportunities, even if it is not always the first to do so”. As a result, proactive firms set the trend for other firms to follow. Instead of following, proactive firms lead and direct the industry within which they operate. Thus, new developments and adjustments within the environment or market do not overpower them. In contrast, a study by Coulthard (2007) revealed that proactiveness is more useful during the early stages of a firm, because as the firm grows, its proactiviteness begins to fall; and not necessarily always being the pacesetter in the market per se (ibid). So, once a firm is established, the role of proactiveness becomes less important (Hughes and Morgan, 2007; Coulthard, 2007). In 2005, Dess and Lumpkin also linked proactiveness to structural capital. They claim that structural capital makes the firm’s proactiveness valuable because it improves its operations and receptiveness of market signals. As a result, these organizations remain market leaders without relinquishing to market follower status. Bleeker (2011) proffers that structural capital such as structures and processes, assist businesses in creating assets and reserves more rapidly and at a lesser cost compared to that of competitors. Lumpkin and Dess (1996) also proffer that proactiveness is an essential attribute in entrepreneurship because of its forward-looking action approach. Proactiveness, therefore, shows itself through the entrepreneur’s actions as (s)he formulates and executes certain ‘stated beliefs’ (Boohene et al, 2012). Furthermore, Hughes and Morgan (2007) have opined that proactiveness is very important in guaranteeing a firm’s superior performance. This assertion is confirmed by other researchers who claim that proactiveness and firm performance are highly correlated (e.g., Day & Wensley, 1988; Wright, Kroll, Pray, & Lado, 1995). This is as a result of the proactive firm’s customer 31 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh oriented philosophy, and its ability to predict and pursue customer needs (Hanson & Morgan, 2007). 2.7.3 Risk-taking Since the inception of entrepreneurship in the 1700’s, risk-taking has been one of the most notable features of an entrepreneur. Richard Cantillon, who was among the first people to officially use the term ‘entrepreneurship’, highlighted the risk aspect of entrepreneurship in his understanding of the term. He explained entrepreneurship as the tendency to undertake any venture/adventure whose conclusion is uncertain (Cantillon, 1734). Thus, seamen, as well as soldiers, were referred to as entrepreneurs, because these expeditions were considered risky undertakings that were full of uncertainty (Buame, 2012). Cantillon (1734) classified the producers in the market economy into two: hired people and entrepreneurs. Hired people referred to those people who receive fixed wages, and entrepreneurs referred to those people who worked for themselves. He further argued that this feature of uncertainty served to distinguish entrepreneurs from hired workers (Cantillon, 1734; Lumpkin & Dess, 1996). Thus, risk-taking is frequently used to describe entrepreneurs (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996; Meyer, Walker & Litwin, 1961). Following this assertion, risk taking may be defined as the degree to which managers willingly commit huge resources, uncertain of the outcome (Miller & Friesen, 1982) define. There are different ways of explaining risk depending on the context within which it is defined (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996). In the context of strategy, Baird and Thomas (1985; p. 231- 232) classified risk into three types: (a) venturing into the unknown, (b) committing a relatively large portion of assets, and (c) borrowing heavily. Gasse (1982) explain that these convey uncertainty and may apply generally to other types of risk discussed in the entrepreneurship literature, such as personal risk, social risk, or psychological risk. In the area of financial analysis too, Lumpkin 32 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh and Dess (1996) postulate that risk refers to the trade-off between risk and return; or the probability of a loss. Liles (1974) also postulate that not only do entrepreneurial pursuits lead to financial risks, but they also lead to additional personal risks such as missed career opportunities or strained family relations. The literature exposes a positive relationship between risk preferences and firm performance (Atkinson, 1957). Performance levels may, therefore, be higher when there is a greater uncertainty about the outcome, and entrepreneurs are often willing to take the risk of uncertainty and shoulder the responsibility for failure (Covin & Slevin, 1991; Chen, 2007). Risk taking may, however, be a firm-level orientation (Baird & Thomas, 1985), or an individual level trait (Sitkin & Pablo, 1992; Brockhaus, 1980). Organizations that are more likely to take risks tend to focus more on seeking worthwhile opportunities (Wiklund & Shepherd, 2003), although this may depend on their level of development (Lumpkin & Dess, 2001). Again, recent discourse evinces that researchers understand risk-taking at the firm-level to be the firm’s courage to undertake activities like entering new markets, committing significant firm resources to uncertain ventures and/or borrowing heavily (Coulthard, 2007; Keh et al., 2007; Wiklund & Shepherd, 2005; Baker & Sinkula, 2009). According to Fernald Jr, Solomon & Tarabishy (2005), balancing risk is essential to leadership. They further explain that because it is impossible to predict the future with certainty, leaders must consider all the numerous factors involved in a particular situation for decision-making. Two kinds of risk have been identified: chance-related and skill-related risk. Macko and Tyszka (2009) note that the extent to which the leader has control over the outcome differentiates between the two kinds of risk, and affects entrepreneurs’ propensity to take risk. For instance, in tossing a coin, one cannot control the outcome since it depends on pure luck. However, in a competition or quiz, the outcome depends on both luck and on the skill or knowledge of the 33 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh decision-maker. Extant literature, therefore, suggests that entrepreneurial leaders are more likely to take risk when the outcome of the action depends on their own skills rather than on pure chance (Heath & Tversky, 1991; Camerer & Lovallo, 1999; Vlek & Stallen, 1981; Weinstein, 1984). Thus, though risk-taking is considered an attribute of entrepreneurship, Kuratko and Hodgetts (2001) opine that successful entrepreneurs are not gamblers who accept unnecessary risks; rather, they take carefully calculated ones (Begley & Boyd 1987b). Zahra (2005) also suggest that entrepreneurs face various kinds of risks as they lead their family organisations. The most common among these risks is the business risk which result from the inconsistency in a firm’s performance. He further posits that business risk could arise as a result of unpredictability in the industry as a whole. These uncontrollable factors such as changes in the technological waves, changes in economic indices, and social change significantly alter the stream of a company’s earnings (Zahra, 2005). In spite of the changes within the industry, another side of the business risk is linked to the firm itself, mirroring the unique qualities of the firm and its senior decision-makers. Also family firms are characterized by some factors, including; assets, cultures, and managerial processes, that induce uncertainty about the consistency of their earning streams. Habbershon, Williams and MacMillan (2003) also posit that another source of uncertainty arise from certain intangible qualities that create the “familiness” quality of these firms. The nature of entrepreneurial activities of family owned business operations can be a source of risk. This is because entrepreneurship focuses on identifying and taking advantage of opportunities in the market by managing existing and new resources in ways that create a competitive advantage. These opportunities can be quite risky as the required time investment, as well as the payoff from them, remain unknown variables. Entrepreneurs need to try several new combinations of resources that will help the firm innovate in terms of novel offerings to 34 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh the market. This period of trial-and-error could waste time, and be expensive and risky as one cannot be sure whether the desired outcome will be realized. Even if entrepreneurs succeed in finding the winning combination, it is difficult to protect their competitive advantage because imitation is normal (Zahra, 2005). 2.7.4 Visionary Another important feature of an entrepreneurial leader is the ability to have a vision. Sashkin & Rosenbach (1998) describe vision as the ability to mentally and behaviorally construct the future. A good leader often plans in advance, thinking hard about causal reactions and how to achieve the desired outcomes in light of potential setbacks and opportunities. Entrepreneurial leaders are required to be visionary, and this often involves a deep meditation on how the vision would align with the entrepreneurial goals of the organization, so that by the time it is communicated to the employees, it is a clear vision, and can inspire the firm to be more proactive, innovative, and risk-taking. 2.7.5 Motivating Entrepreneurial leaders are also good at motivating and encouraging their followers. As in most small businesses, decision-making is often the duty of one key person, it is important that the other members of the firm feel as inspired to achieve organizational goals as the one who develops firm strategy. The literature suggests that both the knowledge and experience of the leader and his team influences organizational growth. Where there is insufficient motivation, however, organizational knowledge may not yield its greatest return (Locke, 2000). Similarly, growth in the organization requires intentional behaviour (Dutton, 1993), but where there is no motivation to spur the desired behaviours, organizational growth slackens. 35 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.8 Entrepreneurial Leadership and SME Growth As mentioned earlier, the survival and growth of SMEs largely depends on the entrepreneur since the major decisions of the firm are taken by the entrepreneur (Frese & de Kruif, 2000). Thus, entrepreneurs who are growth-oriented are more likely to lead in a manner that innovates (Oke, Burke & Myers, 2007). This is because, the entrepreneurial leader identifies problems/gaps in the growth process, explores new ways of doing things, and then boldly go into unexplored areas (thus, taking risks). Also, growth-oriented entrepreneurs are likely to export (Love & Roper, 2015) their products and services so as to increase their market share. They also invest in training employees (BIS, Scottish Enterprise, Invest NI & Welsh Government, 2012) such that the staff are always fortified with quality, up-to-date skills and knowledge. Again, Roper and Hart (2013) noted that entrepreneurial leaders welcome support and advice from the external stakeholders. Growth-oriented entrepreneurs also utilise their external finance in a way that maximum outcomes are achieved (Brown & Lee, 2014), compared to their counterparts who have little/no plans of growing. Again, some studies posit that entrepreneurial leadership significantly impacts the growth of SMEs (Hayton, 2015; Wright et al., 2015). This is because the leader’s past experience and knowledge positively influence the number of market opportunities that the entrepreneur identifies. In order to take advantage of the opportunities identified within the market, the entrepreneur actively adopts formal human resource practices (Rouditser & McKeown, 2015) such as setting challenging and inspiring goals for him/herself and the employees (Wright et al., 2015). They further explain that given adequate commitment, feedback and knowledge, employees are motivated by challenging goals to perform better, compared to the less challenging goals. Thus, through entrepreneurial leadership, firms grow as the entrepreneur is able to spot opportunities, innovate, become more proactive, take risk, as well as motivate his/her employees. 36 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.9 Theoretical Review- Human Capital of the Entrepreneur Becker (1964) propounded the human capital theory which suggests that the more human capital a person possesses, the higher the person’s performance when completing tasks. Human capital refers to the amount of knowledge and skill that a person possess. According to Ventakaraman (1997), the human capital of entrepreneurs consists of all the unique insights, skills, intellectual characteristics, and capacities; although the human capital of an individual has different levels at which it can be transferred (Castanias & Helfat, 1992). Unger, Rauch, Frese, and Rosenbusch (2011) elaborate that human capital is the sum of skills and knowledge that the individual acquires after years of schooling, on-the-job training, and other types of experience. Thus, human capital include inputs such as education, work experience, capabilities and business ownership experience (Ucbasaran, Westhead & Wright, 2008). Some studies have investigated the effect of the human capital inputs of an entrepreneur on his or her productivity, including its effect on decisions such as whether to be independent, the size of the firm (Bates, 1990; Otani, 1996), the longevity of the firm (Gimeno et al., 1997; Bru¨derl et al., 1992) and the performance of the firm (Bosma et al., 2004). Becker (1975) and Davidsson and Honig (2003) report that entrepreneurs with more human capital inputs should achieve better-quality outputs. Shane (2003) also adds that in relation to entrepreneurship, output includes the recognition, pursuit, and utilization of opportunities. This study, therefore, adopts the human capital theory to explain that the more an entrepreneurial leader is educated, experienced and exposed to foreign markets, the better the management of challenges and higher levels of growth. 37 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER THREE CONTEXT OF STUDY 3.0 Introduction It is important that the reader is endowed with the required information that enables him/her to understand the context within which the study is being conducted. This chapter, therefore, provides rich information about SMEs: a brief history about Ghanaian SMEs, some definitions of SMEs, its importance and some of the sector challenges. In addition, the study provides a general overview of the selected companies. 3.1 Country Profile Ghana, formerly known as Gold Coast, attained independence from the British on the 6th of March, 1957 (UNDP, 2017). It is located near the Equator on the Gulf of Guinea in the sub- Saharan region of West Africa (Specifically, West Africa). It is bordered by Ivory Coast on the west, Burkina Faso on the north, Togo on the east and the Gulf of Guinea on the south. Ghana’s capital city called Accra. The official language and currency in Ghana is English and the Ghana Cedi (GH¢) respectively. Ghana’s growth rate in her real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as at 2011 was 15%, but has reduced drastically to 4.2% after three years, i.e. 2014 (ISSER, 2015). Ghana is endowed with several natural resources including, minerals (such as gold, diamonds, bauxite, carbon, etc.), forests, vegetation, and water bodies, among others. Ghana can also boast of tourists attractions such as castles and forts, national parks at Kakum and Mole, mountains, waterfalls, artificial lake, just to mention a few. Ghana is an emerging economy, with a growing population of over twenty-six million as at 2015 (IWS, 2016). Ghanaians are hospitable and enterprising. This explains why over 90% of enterprises in the country are SMEs. 38 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.2 The History and Development of SMEs in Ghana SMEs development in Ghana began as far back as 1970s, in a time where the management of the national economy by Ghanaians became very crucial. Previously, there was no form of private owned enterprises/ indigenous entrepreneurship during the colonial era. Any attempt by indigenes to establish enterprises were discouraged by the colonial masters. After independence in 1957, H.E. Dr. Kwame Nkrumah believed that the country was late in developing the economy through indigenous entrepreneurship. So he established a holding company, the GIHOC, which owned a number of enterprises. Some of which include the following: Ghana Publishing Corporation, Cement works at Tema, Government Electronics Industry at Tema, Ghana Textile Corporation, Cocoa Processing Factories (Takoradi and Tema), Glass Manufacturing Corporation at Aboso, sugar factory at Akuse, Six rattan factories, television assembly plant at Tema, two fibre factories, Tomato Processing Factory, Wenchi, Match Factory, Kade, Tarkwa, Pwalugu Tomato Factory, and Ghana Glass Factory, among others. Dr. Nkrumah was largely influenced by the Soviet Union and therefore frowned upon private entrepreneurship because he held that it was slow in development. During that time, import substitution was used to supplement any product or service that was lacking. After some series of military interventions, majority of the economic activities in Ghana at the time was largely handled by the foreigners, especially the Lebanese and Nigerians (Ghanaian Enterprises Development Commission Annual Report, 1976). The government at the time then resorted to rural development, which still had some problems. According to Tsamenyi, Enninful-Adu & Onumah (2007), these SMEs were assisted by some institutions, such as, The Office of Business Promotion (now, Ghana Enterprise Development Commission, GEDC); whose major task was to aid Ghanaian businesspersons to penetrate into industries which had formerly been dominated by foreigners. This is because the ‘Alliance Compliance Order’ made such industries accessible to Ghanaians (Tsamenyi et al. 2007). The Ghanaian Business 39 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Promotion Act 334 (1970), which was aimed at promoting private entrepreneurship, followed the ‘Alliance Compliance Order’ (Tetteh-Ossom, 2013). GIPC (2013) reports that some industries in the economy such as leather products, garment manufacturing, and few others were reserved solely for the operation of Ghanaians, as per the Investment Policy Decree 329 (1975). The National Redemption Council Decree (NRCD) 330 (1975) established the Ghanaian Enterprise Commission to ensure the growth of SMEs. The Commission provides the sector with advisory services, financial and technical assistance (Tetteh-Ossom, 2013). He further posit that the government of Ghana developed keen interest in the issue of industrialization and its importance to the country’s economic development. In the course of 1983, the economy was opened to everyone as the government sold majority of the state-owned enterprises to private individuals. However, there was still some level of state control to provide structures as well as maintain law and order, hence, the need for an amalgamated institution that could respond to the needs of the SME sector (Tetteh-Ossom, 2013). In view of that, the National Board for Small Scale Enterprises (NBSSI) was established (to manage the development of the SME sector in the Ghanaian economy) by an Act of Parliament in 1985. The primary responsibility of the Board is to enable Ghanaian SMEs make significant contributions to the development of the economy. The Board achieves this by ensuring the production and distribution of goods and services are performed effectively and efficiently. Ironically, the Board performed poorly, because it was deficient in providing the SME sector with; adequate finance and credit to SMEs, adequate and relevant capacity building programmes, appropriate and improved technology to improve the sector’s productivity for higher growth, among others (Ganu & Boateng, 2012, Tetteh-Ossam, 2013). As a result, it 40 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh became necessary for other institutions to be fused into the NBSSI; GEDC joined NBSSI in 1991, and the Department of Cottage Industries coalesced in 1994. In spite of all these programmes and interventions by both government and non-governmental institutions, the rate at which Ghanaian SMEs grow seem to be dawdling and hardly grow into large businesses. This may be significantly due to the form of leadership being exhibited by the entrepreneur and his/her human capital. Villars in 2006 discovered that majority of conglomerates in Ghana are owned by immigrants. This, therefore, emphasizes the need to research the factors that affect SMEs growth. 3.3 Concept of SMEs There has been varying views in relation to the definition of SMEs within extant literature. As revealed by Storey (1994), there is no clear, consistent and uniformly acceptable definition for small firms. This may be as a result of contextual differences in the economic systems as well as differences in the variables used in describing SMEs globally. In the same vein, firms differ in their level of capitalization, sales, and employment (Kayanula & Quartey, 2000). Thus, a definition for SMEs which employ measures of size when applied to a particular industry may not be suitable for another industry. Some scholars and organisations have given varying definitions of what constitutes SMEs. For instance, SMEs is defined by Jordan et al (1998) as firms with fewer than 100 employees, and turnover not more than €15 million. Again, the United States of America Small Business Administration in 2004, viewed SMEs as businesses that are individually owned and operated, and are not market leaders in its field of operation. Whereas, World Bank (1976) defines SMEs as enterprises with fixed assets (excluding land) not exceeding US$ 250,000 in value; Grindle et al (1989; p.9-10) posit that “small scale enterprises are firms with less than or equal to 25 41 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh permanent members and with fixed assets (excluding land) worth up to US$ 50,000.” The USAID, in the 1990s, describe corporations who sell about half of its total production and have below 50 employees, as SMEs (see also Mead, 1994). Interestingly, UNIDO used the quantity of employees to differentiate SMEs in industrialized countries from SMEs in emerging countries. In developing countries, businesses with under five workers are micro, enterprises with five up to a maximum of 19 employees are small, medium enterprises have twenty to a maximum of ninety-nine workers, and an enterprise with a hundred or more employees are described as large businesses. In industrialized countries, the situation is different. Firms with over five hundred workers are large, below five hundred to a minimum of hundred employees are medium, and beneath hundred employees are known as small enterprise. Again, López & Aybar (2000) suggest that SMEs are companies with sales below €15 million. Similarly, Ayyagari, Beck, and Demirguc-Kunt (2003) conceptualize SMEs as formal enterprises with, not more than two hundred and fifty (250) employees. European Commission (2010) also classified businesses based on their number of employees- The staff strength of small-sized firm is below 50 employees; that of medium-sized firm has a minimum of 50 employees but not more than 250 employees; Large-sized firms have at least 250 employees. As stated mentioned earlier, it is important to know that there are varying definitions due to the contextual differences in the economic systems as well as differences in the variables used in describing SMEs globally. A careful look at all these definitions above suggest that variables such as number of employees and the value of assets seem to be consistent across contexts. 42 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.4 Ghanaian Understanding of SMEs Similarly, the concept of SMEs in Ghana, also varies depending on the statutory institutions. In Ghana, the number of employees of the enterprise is the most commonly used criterion (Abor & Quartey, 2010; Kayanula & Quartey, 2000); although the different governmental agencies have its own definition and criteria for identifying micro, small, medium and large sized enterprises. At one point, working capital and investment in machinery and equipment is used; while at another time, turnover and the capital employed are used. Confusion often arises, when applying this definition, with respect to the uncertainty and threshold points used by the various official sources. For example, Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development (Ghana) deems any organization that commissions one to nine people as a small scale enterprise, ten to twenty employees as a medium scale enterprise, and beyond twenty employees as a large scale enterprise. Also, the Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) considers firms with less than ten employees as small-scale enterprises, and above ten employees as medium and large-sized enterprises. Ironically, Kayanula and Quartey (2000) observed that in the national accounts, GSS regarded SMEs as companies with up to 9 employees. Similarly, Osei et al (1993), and Steel and Webster (1991), used the cut-off point of 30 employees to define Ghanaian small scale enterprises. Osei et al (1993), further, categorized small-scale enterprises into three categories, namely: (i) micro (employing below 6 people); (ii) very small, (which hires 6-9 people); (iii) small (which appoints between 10 and 29 employees). Recently, the Regional Project on Enterprise Development Ghana manufacturing further grouped businesses into (i) micro enterprises, (ii) small enterprises, (iii) medium enterprises, and (iv) large enterprises. Micro firms constitute less than 5 employees; small 43 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh enterprises range from 5 - 29 employees; medium enterprises employ 30 – 99 employees; and large enterprises have 100 and more employees (Teal, 2002). Alternatively, the firm’s value of fixed assets is another criterion used in defining SMEs. The National Board for Small Scale Industries (NBSSI) in Ghana combines both criteria, i.e. “fixed asset and number of employees,” to define SMEs. The Board defines a firm that has less than nine employees, and plant and machinery (excluding land, buildings, and vehicles) not exceeding 10 million Ghanaian cedis in value, as a small-scale enterprise. This study adopts the NBSSI’s definition of SMEs. Also, The Ghana Enterprise Development Commission (GEDC), applies the 10 million Ghanaian cedis upper limit definition for plant and machinery. It is important to note that the process of valuing fixed assets is problematic, due to the continuous depreciation of the local currency (i.e. GH¢) as compared to major trading currencies (such as USD/British Pound Sterling). This often makes such definitions outdated (Kayanula & Quartey, 2000, cited in Peprah, Mensah & Akosah, 2016). After defining SMEs, it is important to look at their nature. 3.5 Structure/Nature/Characteristics of SMEs According to Ministry of Trade and Industry Report (2004), Ghana’s economy is made up of a few large firms, a considerable number of medium enterprises and the masses are within the small and micro enterprises. Mensah (2004) also discovered that there is no factual data (partly because many of these SMEs are unregistered) on the exact number of SMEs in the country. However, a critical look at the data from the Ghana Registrar General’s department suggests that about 90 percent of all registered companies are SMEs. This may be due to the ease with which SMEs are established. Unlike the case of large companies, Tetteh-Ossom (2013) found that the capital, technology; management and utilities required of SMEs are simple. For this 44 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh reason, SMEs are more prominent in the Ghanaian economy, representing about 92 percent of all Ghanaian businesses, according to Abor and Quartey (2010). In Ghana, the SME industry has been categorized into two broad strands: the formal sector and the informal sector. Abor & Quartey (2010) discovered that SMEs in the formal sector are more likely to have an organogram, registered office(s), salaried employees and business unit(s), whereas enterprises in the informal sector are craftspeople who operate in provisional structures, open spaces, or even from home with few or no paid employees. The latter mostly comprise of individuals artisans, family members and women who are largely involved in food production of local crops, textiles, and leather, agro processing, timber and mining, among others (Kayanula & Quartey, 2000). The major activities in this industry consists of various businesses such as provision and retailing shops and supermarkets, restaurants and food vendors, hair dressing and barbering saloons, clothing and tailoring shops, carpentry and furniture making shops as well as small and medium scale manufacturers of assorted items such as fruit drinks, sachet water, soap, detergents, pharmaceuticals, among others (Kayanula & Quartey, 2000; Ackah & Vuvor, 2011). It is, however, important to note that the activities mentioned above is not limited to the informal sector. Ackah and Vuvor (2011) noted that Ghanaian SMEs, in particular, are not contributing significantly in the international and local capital markets as compared to larger firms, and this exclusion may be due to the higher cost of intermediation of smaller projects. This phenomenon is attributed to the nature of the financial system. Also, though a small number of SMEs have the capacity to market their products abroad, majority of products and services produced by SMEs is mainly targeted at the local market. This could be as a result of various reasons such as; the huge capital requirement for engaging in export trade and the low level of education, training, and awareness of some small business owners. 45 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Generally, SMEs in Ghana are owned by sole proprietors i.e. a single person, who takes all major decisions. These sole proprietors usually have limited formal education, and lack information in the use of new technologies and the credit market (Mensah, 2004). Ghanaian SMEs are mostly labour intensive and operate with low technological know-how and innovation. Again, SMEs are mostly family-owned businesses thus, there is a high tendency for entrepreneurs to employ workers who are often relatives to the owner-manager making it almost impossible to separate ownership from the control of the enterprise. Additionally, differentiating between the finances of the business from that of the entrepreneur’s is very difficult (Ackah & Vuvor, 2011). As compared to larger firms, SMEs are more labour intensive and therefore have lower capital costs associated with job creation (Anheier & Seibel, 1987; Liedholm & Mead, 1987; Schmitz, 1995). SMEs are also characterized by weak management skills, lack of technical know-how and extreme working capital volatility (Mensah, 2004). Anheier and Seibal (1987) postulate that urban and rural SMEs in the informal and industrial sector are very heterogeneous in terms of productivity, entrepreneurial talents, and profits, level of technology, capital assets, and development prospects. Aryeetey and Ahene (2005) discovered that most Ghanaian SMEs begin small and end small with no form of growth regarding the output and number of employees. Furthermore, the growth propensity of SMEs are low in spite of their profitable operations. This is confirmed in Villars’ observation in 2006 that about 5% of SMEs progress into large enterprises. Therefore, SMEs need additional concentration in order to prolong their potential for growth, expansion and lifespan. Thus, this study investigates whether leadership influences SMEs growth and in what ways. 46 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.6 Importance of SMEs The emergence of Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises (SMEs), over the years, have greatly imparted economies all over the world, and its importance cannot be overstated. SMEs are usually viewed as drivers of economic development (Cyril Eze, Guan Gan Goh, Yih Goh, & Ling Tan, 2013; McCann & Ortega-Argilés, 2016). Some studies in both advanced and emerging countries have highlighted the progressive role that SMEs play in any given economy (Abor & Quartey. 2010; Karadag, 2015; Paul, Whittam, & Wyper, 2007). Globally, SMEs are said to account for approximately 95 per cent of all the companies in the world; as well as solve the twin problems of unemployment and poverty. They. As a catalyst for economic growth, SMEs significantly reduce unemployment rates in both developed and developing economies, create revenue for both the government and the populace, as well as serve as an avenue for innovation (Abor & Biekpe, 2005; Cuckovic & Bartlett, 2007; Mensah, 2004; Imeokparia & Ediagbonya, 2014; Taiwo, Falohun & Agwu, 2016). The contribution of small and medium enterprises operating in the manufacturing, service and business industries in most countries, are significantly greater than that of large enterprises in terms of optimum utilization of latent resources, innovations, and productive employment including self-employment.Thus, the development of SMEs to accelerate economic growth is the new trend for global economic policies, especially that of Africa (Calza & Goedhuys, 2016; Robson, Haugh & Obeng, 2009). Developed economies have used SMEs as the medium in achieving rapid industrialization and accelerated economic growth (Harris & Gibson, 2006; Sauser, 2005). For example, according to European Commission (2010) and Schmiemann, (2008), 99.8% of all enterprises in the European Union are SMEs, and they constitute 95% in most developed countries, and employ 47 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh over 60% of available workforce. The situation is no different from that of Asia (Frederick, Bair & Gereffi, 2015; Knight, 2000; OECD, 1997). Contextually, most dominant form of business in Ghana is found in the SME sector (representing 92% of businesses in the economy). Abor and Quartey (2010) posit that SMEs contribute about 70% towards Ghana’s GDP; thus, there is significant impacts on economic growth, income, and employment. SMEs constitute 90% of current businesses in Ghana, and provide approximately 85% of manufacturing employment (Aryeetey, 2001), as well as the provision of basic goods and services, the generation of export and tax revenues, and job creation for socio economic development in Ghana (Frimpong, 2013). SMEs also serve as an avenue for innovation and provide the platform for entrepreneurship. Aryeetey & Ahene (2004) described SMEs as the seedbed for indigenous entrepreneurship. That is to say that, SMEs have provided a podium for homegrown private enterprises to spring in areas and industries that was generally ignored. These small businesses have generated many little investments, which would otherwise not have taken place. A combination of these investments has given rise to indigenous entrepreneurship in Ghana (Alembummah, 2015). In view of these significant contributions made by SMEs, it is expedient that the sector is developed since most large enterprises usually start as small ones. Also, De la Torre et al. (2010) pointed the fact that SMEs need to be promoted to become the backbone of the economy. 3.7 Factors influencing the growth of SMEs Though SMEs are great contributors to the economic development of any given economy, they are faced with a number of obstacles that seem to drag their growth propensity and therefore 48 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh cannot be overlooked. Buame (2012) outlined some challenges facing Ghanaian SMEs. These have been explained below briefly. Inadequate Financing Cook and Nixson (2000) viewed finance as a vital constituent of SMEs development. Of all the challenges that small and medium enterprises encounter in the country, financing is the most dominant one. Aryeetey et al (1994) report that a Ghanaian survey revealed that 38% of SMEs find inadequate financing as an impediment to their development and growth. Therefore, these financial glitches significantly affect the overall macroeconomics performance of SMEs in Ghana. Access to finance Another key problem facing SMEs is access to capital. Inadequate financial resources significantly affect SME development. Cook and Nixson (2000) note that, though SMEs have a vital role to play in the developmental stages of many emerging economies, their development is always controlled by the limited availability of financial resources to meet a variety of both operational and investment needs. Parker et al. (1995) also stated that about 90% of small enterprises in a World Bank study found that access to credit is a major predicament to new investment. The access to financial resources available to smaller enterprises are limited, compared to larger organisations (Levy (1993), thus impedes on their growth and development. This may be as a result of the perceived risk associated with SMEs, management weakness, informational barriers and high cost of intermediation (Hayford, 2010). Access to raw materials and market SMEs are also confronted with a number of limitations in the factor market, although the most common constraints are raw material availability and cost (Levy, 1993). Aryeetey et al (1994) 49 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh found that the high cost of obtaining local raw materials is highlighted by 5% of Ghanaian SMEs in their survey. This may result from poor cash flows of small and medium enterprises. This issue is country-specific, and the magnitude of the problem is dependent on how businesses rate availability, access, or cost, and whether or not their activities are based primarily on domestic or imported inputs (World Bank, 1993; Parker et al, 1995). Inappropriate management skills In today’s highly competitive environment, it has become very important for enterprises to acquire the requisite skills needed to sustain its survival. Even though SMEs attract motivated managers, they find it difficult competing with larger firms; as King and McGrath (2002) noted that majority of those who run these small and medium enterprises are individuals with low levels of education and are therefore unequipped to carry out managerial routines for their enterprises. Although there are several institutions providing training and advisory services, there is still a skills gap in the whole SME sector (Kayanula & Quartey, 2000). This is due to complacency on the part of some entrepreneurs as well as high cost of training and advisory services. For that reason, scarcity of management talent greatly impacts the growth of SMEs. SMEs generally do not need highly skilled labour, because of the adoption of simple technology in their operations. However, when the need arises for specific managerial skills, the amount of skilled labour available is not enough. This limits the opportunities in that specialty; increases costs and reduces flexibility in managing the ventures (Hayford, 2012). Technological advancements People’s lives and businesses today are being shaped dramatically as a result of technology (Kotler & Keller, 2006). Though improvements in technology increase SMEs capabilities, it simultaneously poses new challenges to the enterprise. This is because most Ghanaian entrepreneurs lack the theoretical knowledge and background to strengthen their skills since 50 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh most of them have low levels of education (Buame, 2012). According to Aryeetey et al. (1994) many SMEs in developing countries like Ghana, frequently have drawbacks when gaining access to information on available techniques and appropriate technologies, thus limiting innovation and SME competitiveness. In addition, Hayford (2010) noted that most entrepreneurs are unaware of new technologies, and those aware face difficulties with the availability, affordability, and accessibility of the new technology. Alternatively, SMEs in most cases mostly acquire foreign licenses, because local patents are hard to come by. This de- motivates Ghanaian SMEs from learning and enjoying the vast benefits of improvements in technology, such as growth and development. Domestic Demand Though the Ghanaian market is quite sizeable (i.e. 28 million people), the impoverished economic situation has rendered majority of the populace with low purchasing power. Thus, SMEs are pressurised in terms of quality, customer satisfaction, price, and efficiency. Unfortunately, those who can pay for the products and services of SMEs, prefer foreign goods because they are relatively cheaper and of a higher quality. For instance, since the advent of trade liberalization, some tailors went through a month without any orders (Riedel et al, 1988). Unfair competition from foreign companies Previously insulated from international competition, many SMEs are now faced with greater external competition and the need to expand market share. However, Aryeetey et al. (1994), posit that limited international marketing experience, poor quality control and product standardisation, and little access to international partners, continue to inhibit SMEs’ expansion into international markets. Also, owners of small and medium enterprises lack the necessary information about foreign markets. 51 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Unfavorable government policies Another issue for Ghanaian SMEs has been the arduous legal processes for both registering and commencing business ventures. For example, the legalities required of SMEs in processing export documents and/or clearing goods from the port; as well as settling legal claims in court proceedings, are time-consuming and expensive. Also, SMEs are encumbered with the high start-up costs, which includes, registration costs and licensing. These regulatory controls negatively affect the smooth running of SMEs towards their development and growth. Although a number of wide-ranging structural reforms have led to some improvements, prospects for enterprise development remain to be dealt with at the firm-level. 3.8 Supporting, Facilitating and Regulatory Agencies of SMEs in Ghana There are some institutions and agencies in Ghana that promote and develop SMEs by supporting, facilitating and regulating them. A number of these agencies and institutions include; Ministry of Trade and Industry (MOTI), National Board for Small Scale Industries (NBSSI), Association of Ghanaian Industries (AGI), Ghana Standards Authority (GSA), Ghana Export Promotion Authority (GEPA), Ghana Investors Advisory Council (GIAC), Private Enterprise Federation (PEF), Ghana Investment Promotion Centre (GIPC), Ghana National Procurement Agency (GNPA LTD), Gratis Foundation, Rural Enterprises Programme (REP), Ghana Free Zones Board (GFZB) among others. A few of them are reviewed below: Ministry of Trade and Industry (MOTI): The Ministry of Trade & Industry is the overarching agency and the lead policy advisor to government on trade, industrial and private sector development. It also has the sole responsibility for the formulation, implementation, and monitoring of the country’s domestic and international trade as well as for industrial policies. The Ministry also ensures that Ghana derives maximum benefit from international trade relations and that domestic trade is conducted in a smooth and orderly manner. It is also 52 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh responsible for strengthening trade relations with other countries consistent with Ghana’s membership of the WTO. National Board for Small Scale Industries (NBSSI): NBSSI is one of the top most governmental bodies regulating the promotion and development of the Micro and Small Enterprises (MSE) sector in Ghana. It was established in 1985 by an Act of the Parliament of the Third Republic of Ghana (Act 434 of 1981) because Government views the sector as having the potential to contribute substantially to the reduction of the high unemployment rate and to the growth of the economy of Ghana. Its objectives are to create enabling environments and develop an enterprise culture in Ghana, promote MSE sector associations and facilitate access to credit for small enterprises. Association of Ghanaian Industries (AGI): AGI is a voluntary business association of over 1200 members, made up of small, medium and large scale manufacturing and services industries in agro-processing (food and beverages), agri-business, pharmaceuticals, electronics and electrical, telecommunications, information technology, utilities, service industries, transport, construction, textiles, garments and leather, banking and advertising. The association has been in existence since 1957, and it is committed to assisting the industrial sector by advocating for a better business climate in Ghana. Specifically, it seeks to provide a central organization for the promotion of the interest of the industry, thus defining its identity as the leading voice of the private sector. Ghana Investment Promotion Authority (GIPC): The Centre was re-established under the Ghana Investment Promotion Centre Act, 2013 (Act 865). It has been authorized to encourage, promote, coordinate and monitor all investments, with the exception of mining and petroleum, in the Ghanaian economy. Act 478 also enjoins the Centre to coordinate and monitor all 53 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh investment activities; as well as assists domestic and foreign investors, and also provide reliable information as they seek opportunities to engage in the Ghanaian business domain. GIPC partners with both private and public sectors including; Bank of Ghana, Ghana Immigration Service (GIS), Ghana Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Invest in Africa, and many others. GIPC bears a mission is to make Ghana “the first destination of choice for investing in Africa,” and its vision is to be “the official and most accurate information hub for investors in Ghana by providing seamless one stop shop – high value added services”. The Centre has instituted a number of activities that help it carry out their mandate effectively and efficiently. One of the activities is the Ghana Club 100 initiative which was launched in 1998 to reward firms and investors who have significantly contributed to Ghana’s development. Since its inception, the initiative allows GIPC to annually recognize and award the top 100 businesses in Ghana. Businesses are ranked based on their average score with regard to size, profitability and growth. Companies that make it on the list must serve as role models for the other companies in Ghana and also provide a platform for interacting with policy makers. That is where the researcher selected transformational entrepreneurs so as to draw valuable lessons for SMEs in Ghana. 3.9 Overview of selected firms This section provides a brief profile of the firms that have been selected for the study with regard to the name, the industry within which they operate, their major activities, board of directors, vision and mission 3.9.1 Kama Health Services Limited (now known as Mikkado Holdings) Kama Health Services Limited was established under the Companies Code of 1963 on 24th January 1983 to carry on business in manufacturing of drugs, animal, and vegetable farms for proteins and vitamins, operating a clinic and management consultancy on health service. 54 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Kama Health Service was wholly owned by Dr. Michael Agyekum Addo, a renowned Ghanaian. Kama Health Services began operations in 1986 from small beginnings as pharmacy in Kumasi with a modest capital of ¢50,000 (Now GH¢ 5). It has since established eleven (11) outlet pharmacies in six regions in Ghana and currently holds distributorship license for eight international pharmaceutical manufacturers. Kama Health Services is also a main distributor for most of the major pharmaceuticals manufacturers in Ghana. Through the pioneering spirit, entrepreneurial attributes and leadership qualities of the CEO, the Promoter, Kama Health Services has achieved spectacular growth within a relatively short period to attain a position as one of Ghana’s leading enterprises and a major player in the Ghanaian pharmaceutical sector. The company manufactures drugs for both local and international markets producing 42 different types of syrups, suspensions, and mixtures, 10 kinds of tablets, 7 kinds of capsules and 1 powder product. Within just a decade of operations, it became possible for the company’s stated capital to increase from ¢50,000 (old cedis, equivalent to GH¢ 5), to ¢200,000,000 (old cedis, equivalent to GH¢ 20,000) in 1998. Also, the staff strength of the company increased from one person in 1983 to one hundred and fifty (150) people in 2000 and to two hundred and fifty people (250) in 2010. The remarkable achievements within the past decade have enabled Kama Health Services to develop into an integrated health group of companies comprising: Kama Health Services Limited, Kama Industries Limited, Kama Clinic, Kama Forex Bureau Limited, Kama Real Estates Limited, and Kama Conference Center. The Kama Group is headed by an eight-member board of directors, comprising of six Ghanaians and two Dutch nationals, to which the CEO reports. The deputy CEO supervises administration, production, marketing, and accounts. 55 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The vision of the Kama Group is to place Kama as a center of excellence for the production of quality drugs and provision of services, which are marketable, worldwide. The mission of the Kama Group is to enhance and promote good health of its entire customers through the production, distribution, and sale of quality pharmaceutical products and services in partnership with the company’s affiliates worldwide. Source: Adapted from Field data (2017), Sutton & Kpentey (2012) and http://www.gipcghana.com/89-ghana-club-100/sector-leaders/353-kama-health-services.html 3.9.2 Forever Clair Beauty Clinic Mrs. Grace Amey Obeng is one of the best-known women entrepreneurs in Ghana. She is a U.K. and U.S. trained professional medical aesthetician and the CEO of Forever Claire Group of companies and the founder of Grace Amey Obeng Foundation International. The whole idea of Forever Clair was birthed to minimize and in a long run solve the issue of skin bleaching among lots of Ghanaian and African women in the 1980s and 1990s since it was in vogue at the time. Forever Clair launched its cosmetics product lines, which promoted the beauty of black African skin at a time when many of the competing product lines were selling standard, but harmful, skin lightening formulas; plus soaps and body cream. A beauty clinic was established with financial support from her family to enhance this course and by 2013, the beauty clinic has developed over eight (8) branches in Ghana. The clinic has grown to the stage of international trade through exporting its products to some international countries which include; Togo, Nigeria, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Ivory Coast and several West African counties. Mrs. Obeng has been recognized for he numerous achievements and has won lots of awards in the industry. In 1999, the FC Beauty College was established, and has to date, trained up to 5,000 young people, mostly women. The company has more than 250 trainee staff currently, who are engaged in hairdressing and beauty therapy 56 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Forever Clair group of companies provides a variety of services such as beauty services manufacturing, education, equipment, and building. In the past years, Forever Clair group of companies has grown into five other subsidiaries and is worth about USD 8billion in annual turnover. For a business that started with only $100, it has achieved tremendous success promoting an idea and brand that may have been very unpopular at the time. The CEO was brave and determined to create a special niche that catered to the unique needs of black African women who needed to preserve or return to their natural skin colour. The company also seeks to help the less privilege in the society through the Grace Amey Obeng Foundation International. Her zeal in entrepreneurship has brought more success and global recognition of Forever Clair Group of Companies. Source: Adapted from Field data (2017) and Iwuoha (2013). Forever Clair – The business that fights skin bleaching by preserving the African natural skin, http://www.smallstarter.com/get- inspired/forever-clair-grace-amey-obeng/ (Accessed on 12/04/2017). 3.9.3 DAASCO Group DAASCO group of companies started in the year 1986 as a sole proprietorship under the name ‘DAASCO Enterprise’ owned by Mr Dasmond Alex Akpagbli. Through the entrepreneurial spirit of Mr. Akpagbli, DAASCO Enterprise has blossomed to become DAASCO Group of Companies which constitute several companies among which include; DAASCO International Limited, Emmajet Forex Bureau, His Presence Hotel, Ceragem Ghana, and DAASCO farms; with several branches spread across Ghana and Europe. DAASCO group of companies was launched in 1994 and has been in operations for the past twenty-three years. DAASCO Group has its Global Head Quarters located in Tema, Ghana. DAASCO international limited has gained international recognition and won an award in Geneva. 57 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DAASCO international limited deals in the distribution of Digital TV Broadcast equipment and visual presentation systems; as well as distributing other equipment such as computers, stationary, digital radio broadcast equipment, and telecom products. DAASCO International Limited mostly deals in B2B (Business to Business) as it offers quality services and world class products to a wide range of organisations which include; banks, government institution, hotels, churches, individuals, tertiary institutions and many others. Emmajets Forex Bureau is also one of the leading forex bureaus in the country with about eight branches spread across the Greater Accra Region. Also, Ceragem Ghana (sole distributers of Ceragem massage products) supplies massaging beds to the hospitals and other health centres as well as some individuals. DAASCO partners with international companies such as JVC and SAHARA (Sahara presentation systems plc), Zenith Bank, and VISA. DAASCO’s mission and vision is to organise resources and solutions to solve today’s problem with the future in mind. The group also believes in a balanced economic growth to business growth and environmental existence; the reason it thoroughly explains its timely innovative solutions. Source: Adapted from Field data (2017) and http://www.daascogroup.com/about.html (Accessed on 13/06/2017) 3.9.4 Jandel Limited Jandel Limited is a wholly owned Ghanaian company with an excellent trade record in the business of Event Planning, Interior and Exterior decoration, Landscaping, Renovations, Export and Import of general goods and services. It was established by Madam Afi Amoro (Founder and CEO of Jandel Limited) in the year 1996. Thus, Jandel has been in existence for the past 21years, gathering experience in the total event management business which includes management of state, corporate and private events such as weddings and parties. The company’s core business is into event planning and décor, however over the years is has 58 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh blossomed into other subsidiaries that provide construction, interior decoration, horticulture and landscaping, and purchasing and supply. Before Jandel, Madam Afi Amoro was working in the civil service while at the same time moon lighting as a florist. The conversion of her hobby into a business was fueled by people offering to pay her for her services. The motivation behind Jandel limited started from a need to supplement her meagre salary to provide a better quality of life for her family since she was the first child of her parents, so, a lot rested on her shoulders. Eventually, the demand for her services begun to grow she went back to the University as a matured student. She found herself multi-tasking as a single parent, a student, a worker and a founder of a fledging business. Having assessed the viability of the business, it became necessary to concentrate and grow it. The growth of the business was determined by her client’s demands. Once a client was in need of her services, she would find a way of providing it. She just had to make a little profit on it. So she would subcontract, observe and implement it herself the next time. From a sole proprietorship, grew the business to 3 employees, then 6 employees, and she can currently boast of a staff strength of 62 workers with various levels of qualification. Her clientele base has also grown to include large organisations such as MTN, Tigo, Zenith Bank PLC, Barclays Bank, Standard Chartered Bank, and Ecobank amidst increasing individual clients. Jandel’s vision is to be number one in every aspect of its businesses while protecting the environment and humanity at large within the West African sub Region and beyond. The mission of Jandel Limited is to maintain its lead in the creative industry, as well as improve their performance and market share in all areas of their core businesses. Source: Adapted from Field data (2017) and http://www.jandellimited.com/index.php/jandel (Accessed on 14/04/2017) 59 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER FOUR METHODOLOGY 4.0 Introduction This chapter provides an overview of the methods that the researcher selected in carrying out the research so as to address the research problem and achieve the purpose of the study. The general approach for executing a research project is also known as ‘Research Methodology’ (Leedy & Ormrod, 2001). Potter (1996) once said that “methods are the tools used in a study while methodology is the blueprint of the study.” Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009) also defined research methodology as “the procedural framework within which a research is conducted.” According to Taylor and Bogdan (1984), the manner in which the researcher examines and looks for solutions to pre-defined/already existing research problems constitutes research methodology. Also, serves as a set of guidelines for analysis, where the assessment of data can be used to elicit conclusions (Eldabi, Irani, Paul, & Love, 2002). This chapter adopts the “research onion” proposed by Saunders, et al (2009). Thus, this chapter explores the research philosophy supporting the study, the research approach, research design, research strategy, population and sampling design, issues concerning data collection, data analysis techniques, as well as ethical considerations. 4.1 The Research Onion “Research onion,” as developed by Saunders, et al (2009), refers to a diagrammatic representation of the various methodological approaches used in conducting the study (see figure 4.1). Thus, the researcher adopts it to provide a snapshot of the methodological choices made in this study. 60 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Figure 4.1: Research Onion for the study Source: Adapted from Saunders et al. (2009). 61 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 4.2 Research Philosophy underpinning the study It is essential that in all research projects, there should be a relationship between the researcher’s own values, worldview about knowledge, theory underpinning the study, research methods and the aims of the research (Buame, 1996; Taylor & Bogdan, 1984). For that reason, it is imperative to discuss the research philosophy and paradigm underlying the research before embarking on a study of this nature. Research philosophy relates to how knowledge is developed and the forms of that knowledge (Saunders et al., 2009). Generally, research depends entirely on a particular view of reality adopted by the researcher. Thus, as posited by Saunders et al. (2009), the research standpoint embraced by the researcher contains central assumptions made by the researcher concerning opinions about how the world works. Again, they opine that the research strategy and the methods chosen to examine the phenomenon will depend on these assumptions. Guba (1990) and Creswell (2009) referred to this view of reality as the “Worldview,” which means the belief systems that guide one’s action. According to Blaikie (2000, p. 8), this worldview, commonly referred to as ontology in research poses assumptions “about what exists, what it looks like, what units make it up and how these units interact with each other.” Bhattacherjee (2012, p.17) also refers to ontology as the “colored glasses” through which one views the world. Gummesson (2000) discovered that the concept of paradigms was proposed by Thomas Kuhn (in the early 1960s) to stand for “people’s value, standards, frames of reference, perspectives, ideologies, myths, theories, and approved procedures that govern their thinking and action.” Kuhn (1962) defined paradigms as the “entire constellation of beliefs, values, techniques, and theories shared by members of a scientific community”. The concept of paradigm can also refer to “a set of assumptions about the social world, and about what constitute proper techniques and topics for inquiry” (Punch, 2013). Similarly, according to Mangan, Lalwani, & 62 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Gardner (2004), the concept of paradigm is a general conception of the nature of scientific endeavor within which a given enquiry is undertaken. After reviewing extant literature, Boateng concluded in 2014 that there are numerous and different paradigms with several taxonomies to distinguish between them. The most dominant paradigms commonly referred to in social science research include, Positivism. Interpretivism, Realism, Relativism and Critical Realism (Boateng, 2014). Creswell (2007) noted that each paradigm has a structure that differentiates itself from other paradigms though its own set of epistemological, ontological and methodological assumptions. According to Boateng (2014), researchers in support of the positivist paradigm are of the view that there is a reality that is single, objective and tangible. On the contrary, the interpretivist ontology believes there are several truths which are reliant on human experiences and interpretation. The realist viewpoint also believes that a triangulation from many sources is required to try to know “reality” because though it is real, it is improperly understood (Boateng, 2014). Saunders et al., (2009) simply explain the theory of realism as there exists a reality that is to a certain extent independent of the mind. Furthermore, the critical realist paradigm, argues that experiencing the world is a two-step process- first of all, there is the thing itself and the sensations it conveys (Saunders et al., 2009; the transitive world, see Boateng (2014)); and secondly, there is the psychological processing that goes on sometime after that sensation meets our senses (the intransitive world, see Boateng (2014)). The relativism theory also perceive that multiple realities exist. Thus, reality as truth is not “absolute,” it is dependent on ‘something’ and it does exist (Boateng, 2014). Considering the research objectives outlined in chapter one, the researcher deems it appropriate to follow the interpretivist approach or view. This stance is enlightened by Bhattacherjee (2012), who postulates that the social scientist needs to understand the social actions of their 63 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh research subjects through interpretive means- considering the meaning and purpose they place on their actions. The interpretivist view has a concern to understand the world as it is- see the world as an emergent social process, and seek to understand at the level of subjective experience. According to Whitley (1984), interpretivists try to find the implications and rational behind people’s actions like: how they behave and interact with others in the society and culture. Likewise, Elster (2007) and Walsham (1995b) explain interpretivism as the approach which highlights the expressive nature of people’s character and involvement in both social and cultural life. Saunders et al. (2009) explain that interpretivism is an epistemology that differentiates conducting research among people rather than objects (such as trucks and computers), because it advocates that the researcher needs to understand variances between people in our role as societal beings. Hence, the researcher has to take it upon him/herself to enter the social world of the research subjects and understand their world from their perspective because Schwandt (2000; p. 191) opines that “what an action means can be grasped only in terms of the system of meanings to which it belongs.” As against the positivist paradigm which simplifies the complex nature of the world into a series of law- like generalisations, those in support of the interpretivist paradigm consider the complexity of the world to avoid losing rich insights (Saunders et al., 2009). Thus, interpretivism provides an understanding of differences between the human actors Conversely, Lin (1998) explained that interpretivist researchers look for specific ways in which a relationship is established and the setting within which it occurs. As a result, these scholars are able to understand how a relationship occurred, rather than simply knowing what has occurred (Chowdhury, 2014; Kelliher, 2005; Lin, 1998). The interpretivist is fundamentally not interested in generalizing his/her findings because life is dynamic (Saunders et al., 2009) and how every research subject reacts to a particular issue is dependent on their viewpoint and environment. Therefore, as researchers try to interpret what they see, hear and understand 64 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh (Creswell, 2009), they work towards theory building through interpretive methods such as action research and ethnography (Bhattacherjee, 2012). 4.3 Research Approach There are two major approaches to research, which include the deductive and inductive research approaches (Saunders et al. 2009). They further suggest that the approach a researcher adopts should be influenced by the paradigm that (s)he belongs to. This is because the research approach will also influence the research design and strategy that will be adopted. Malhotra (2007) refers to a form of thinking in which a conclusion is validly inferred from some premises as deduction; and these conclusions are true only if those premises are true. Hence, understanding data in the deductive approach makes use of existing knowledge, since it serves as a guide. The premises of deductive arguments is formed from the building and establishment ‘facts’. This reasoning begins from general principles from which the deduction is to be made, and proceeds to a conclusion by way of some statement relating the particular case in question. Ali & Birley (1999) posit that well-established existing theory underpins a deductive research, which informs the development of hypotheses, the choice of variables and the resultant measures. The deductive approach therefore commences with theory articulated in the form of hypotheses, which are then tested (Malhotra & Birks, 2006). The use of quantitative data, controls to allow the testing of hypotheses, and highly structured methodology to facilitate replication (Gill & Johnson, 2010) describes the deductive approach (Saunders et al., 2009). Additionally, in deduction approaches, principle of reductionism is followed in that, concepts need to be operationalized in a way that enables facts to be measured quantitatively; the; and generalizations are made (ibid). 65 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Induction, as explained by Malhotra and Birks (2006), is a form of reasoning that draws from an instance or repeated combination of events in order to conclude or may be make universally accepted generalizations. In Saunders et al. (2009) view, the induction approach allows the researcher to appreciate the way in which humans interpret their social world; unlike the deduction approach which enables a cause–effect link to be made between certain variables without understanding humans and the context within which they find themselves. The strength of the inductive approach therefore lies on the developing of the understanding of humans and how they interpret their social world. Furthermore, unlike the deductive approach, the inductive approach provides a less structured/flexible methodology that is likely to reveal some additional explanations to the phenomenon under study. Also, the context in which events took place is greatly important to the inductive approach (Saunders et al., 2009). It is therefore more appropriate to use a small number of respondents in an inductive approach as against a large number in the deductive approach. Thus, researchers inclined towards the inductive approach should work with qualitative data and triangulate data collection methods in order to establish different views of the phenomena (Easterby-Smith, Thorpe, & Lowe, 2002). For these reasons, the researcher adopts an inductive approach to better understand entrepreneurial leadership from the Ghanaian perspective/context. 4.4 Research Design Malhotra & Birks (2006) defined research design as “a framework or blueprint for conducting the marketing research project. It also specifies the details of the procedures necessary for obtaining the information needed to structure or solve marketing research problems.” However, research design is not only limited to the field of marketing, but can be used in any field of research. In order to structure or solve research problems, the research design specifies the necessary process that the researcher needs to go through to obtain the information needed. It also provides both the framework and road map for the research (Kuada, 2015). Thus, Teyi 66 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh (2014) concludes that the research design sets the basis for conducting the project. McGivern (2006) notes that the research design’s purpose of is to organize the research such that it provides evidence necessary to answer the research problem as “accurately, clearly and unequivocally” as possible. A research design also ensures that the researcher strives toward objectivity (Guy, Edgley, Arafat, & Allen, 1987). Also, the process of turning a research question into a research project can be referred to as a research design as (Robson, 2002). However, a research design is different from research tactics (Saunders et al. 2009). The overall plan for the research is the research design, and the finer detail of data collection and analysis is the tactics. Other scholars also postulate that, the choice of a research design shapes the subsequent research activities; for instance, what data to collect and how it should be collected (Ghauri & Grønhaug, 2005; Kornhauser & Lazarsfeld, 1955). The research design invariably exposes the type of research (whether exploratory, descriptive or casual) and the researcher’s priorities (Ghauri & Grønhaug, 2005). These priorities are reflected in the purpose of the study which then seeps into the research questions asked. Usually, the research methods’ literature classifies research purpose into three, namely: exploratory, descriptive and explanatory (Saunders et al 2009). They however noted that, the research project may have more than one purpose, just as a research question can be both descriptive and explanatory. Descriptive research, as the name suggests “portrays an accurate profile of persons, events or situations” (Robson, 2002; p.59). In addition, Malhotra and Birks (2006) postulate that the major goal of descriptive research is to describe something, such as, market characteristics or functions. In conducting this kind of research, Saunders et al. (2009) are of the view that the 67 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh formulation of specific research questions and hypotheses precedes data collection; therefore, the researcher needs to understand the phenomena on which (s)he wishes to collect data before collecting it. As a result, descriptive research is pre-planned and structured, as the information needed is clearly defined. It is most appropriate for surveys, because it is based on large representative samples. Again, Malhotra and Birks (2006) is of the view that descriptive research design lays down the methods for selecting data sources and how to collect data from those sources. According to Saunders et al. (2009), explanatory studies are studies that prove the existence of causal relationships between variables. In order to explain the relationships between variables in explanatory studies, the emphasis is on studying a situation or a problem. So, a researcher has two options: either collect qualitative data to explain, in order to get a clearer view of the relationship, or subject the data to statistical tests such as correlation (ibid). An exploratory research refers to a research design that is characterized by a flexible and evolving approach to understand events that are inherently difficult to measure (Malhotra & Birks, 2006). Robson (2002; p.59) also highlight that a study exploratory in nature, is a constructive way of finding out “what is happening; to seek new insights; to ask questions and to assess phenomena in a new light.” in cases where the exact nature of the problem is uncertain, yet the researcher wishes to explain the problem, exploratory research is most appropriate (Saunders et al., 2009). A search of the literature; interviewing ‘experts’ in the subject; and conducting focus group interviews are the three main ways of conducting exploratory research (Saunders et al., 2009). They further postulate that exploratory research’s advantage over both descriptive and explanatory is its flexible nature and the fact that it is adaptable to change. Thus, when 68 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh conducting the exploratory study, a pollster must be willing to make adjustments where necessary, due to new data that appear and new insights that may occur. Metaphorically, Adams and Schvaneveldt (1991) compared exploratory research with the activities of a traveler or explorer because of the flexible nature of their expedition. They however emphasize that, the flexibility in this context does not mean there is no direction to the investigation. Instead, it means, the researcher initially has a broad focus and as the research progresses, the broad picture becomes progressively narrower. Thus, this research is exploratory in nature as it tries to explain the concept of entrepreneurial leadership and get new insights on the concept within the Ghanaian context, as well as find out how and/or in what ways this concept influences SME growth. 4.5 Research Strategy Research strategy is the roadmap for undertaking a systematic research of a phenomenon of interest (Marshall & Rossman, 1999). Similarly, Saunders et al. (2009) also refers to research strategy as the general plan regarding the answering of research questions that have been set. Again, Remenyi, Williams, Money and Swartz (1998) proffer that every research is guided by a strategy, and that strategy gives a general guideline for the research, which includes the manner in which the research is to be conducted. A researcher has the opportunity to choose from a variety of research strategies. Yin (2013; 2003) posits that irrespective of whether the study is exploratory, descriptive or explanatory, these strategies can be used; although, some of these strategies are deductively inclined while others are biased towards the inductive approach. It is also important to note that none of the research strategies is inherently superior or inferior to any other (Saunders et al., 2009); however, a researcher’s choice of strategy is directed by the research question(s) and 69 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh objectives, the extent of existing knowledge, the amount of time and other resources that he/she may have available, as well as the researcher’s own philosophical viewpoints. Thus, Saunders et al. (2009) postulate that the most important thing is not the label that is attached to a particular strategy, but that the chosen strategy should help the researcher solve the research question(s) and meet the research objectives. In view of that, Saunders et al (2009) outline seven research strategies that any researcher can select from.These include: experiment, ethnography, action research, archival research, grounded theory, survey and case study. Some of the strategies are discussed below followed by a justification for using the case study approach. Ethnography Ethnography is a typical inductive approach believed to explain social world at first hand (Saunders et al, 2009). This strategy is a qualitative design, which according to Creswell (2007), includes studying how people of the same culture behave, relate to one another and their language. The researcher adopting this strategy should describe and interpret the shared and learned patterns of values, behaviors, beliefs, and language of a cultural-sharing group (Harris, 1968, cited in Creswell, 2007). Saunders et al (2009) therefore opine that the researcher ought to immerse him/herself in the daily lives of the people sharing the same culture, with the intention of observing and interviewing them. The research process has to be flexible and responsive to change since the researcher will constantly be developing new patterns of thought about what is being observed. Ethnography research strategy is timewasting; yet, the researcher’s purpose for choosing this strategy is to describe and explain the social world in which the research subjects live just as they would describe and explain it (Saunders et al, 2009). 70 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Archival Research As the name suggests, archival research strategy makes use of documents in the archives. Saunders et al (2009) explain that in archival research, the researcher relies on administrative records and documents as the primary source of data. In addition, Bryman (1993) noted that archival research can refer to both recent and historical documents, although the term has historical connotations. As a result, this strategy allows researchers to ask questions related to past events and changes that have occurred over time; irrespective of whether exploratory, descriptive or explanatory in nature (Saunders et al, 2009). However, the ability to answer such questions is however limited by the kind of the administrative records and documents available. Thus, Saunders et al. (2009) suggest that the researcher using this strategy needs to establish what data are available and also design the research to make the most of it. Grounded theory According to Saunders et al. (2009), grounded theory is developed from data generated by a chain of observations. Collis and Hussey in 2003, referred to this strategy as inductive/deductive approach, why because, researchers continually refer to the data, to develop and test theory. This strategy according to Goulding (2002), helps in predicting and explaining behaviors and is geared towards developing and building theory. The strength of grounded theory lies in the generation of theories regarding social phenomena: that is, to develop higher level understanding that is “grounded in, or derived from a systematic analysis of data. (Lingard, Albert & Levinson, 2008). The aim of this strategy is to describe processes rather than test or verify existing theories. Grounded theory is therefore suitable for studies concerning social to social relations or experiences (Saunders et al 2009). 71 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Case Study Case study is a "systematic inquiry into an event or a set of related events which aims to describe and explain the phenomenon of interest. A case study is “a strategy for doing research which involves an empirical investigation of a particular contemporary phenomenon within its real life context using multiple sources of evidence” (Robson, 2002; p. 178). Saunders et al (2009) also describes case studies as a study of a phenomenon in its real context. Yin (2003) defines case study as an empirical inquiry that investigates a contemporary phenomenon within its real life context, especially when the boundaries between phenomenon and context not clearly evident. He further adds that a case study allows the researcher to explore individuals or organizations simply through complex interventions, relationships, communities or programs (Yin, 2011). Case study approach is most appropriate for researchers in search for rich understandings of a phenomenon in a given context and the processes being enacted (Morris & Wood, 1991). Most often than not, a case study is used in explanatory and exploratory research, and it has a substantial capability to generate answers to ‘why’, ‘how’ and ‘what’ questions although what and how questions tend to be more associated survey strategy (Saunders et al., 2009). The aforementioned paragraphs highlighted the various research strategies that can be espoused in this study. Guy et al (1987) however warns that the researcher must be cautious when selecting a research strategy. They suggest that the researcher must consider the unit of analysis, research period, research setting and research purpose before deciding which research strategy will be most appropriate for the research. In view of that, this research adopts the case study strategy, it is inductive, and nonexperimental. This is because; Morris and Wood (1991) postulate that case study approach is most appropriate for researchers in search for rich understandings of a phenomenon in a 72 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh given context and the processes being enacted. Thus, since the researcher’s main aim is to gain in-depth understanding of entrepreneurial leadership and SME growth, case study strategy is the most appropriate. Creswell (2007) also argues that a case study is a good approach when the enquirer has clearly identifiable cases with boundaries and seeks to provide an in-depth understanding of the cases or a comparison of several cases. This is evident in the cases the researcher used as all the respondents are Ghanaian transformational entrepreneurs who are CEOs of their various companies. As posited by Yin (2011), the case study strategy provides the researcher the liberty to explore a number of Ghanaian transformational entrepreneurs through complex interventions, relationships, communities or programs. Last but not the least, one of the objectives of this study is to understand ‘how’ transformational entrepreneurs in Ghana understand entrepreneurial leadership, and Saunders et al. (2009) opines that the most appropriate strategy that answers why’, ‘how’ and ‘what’ questions is the case study strategy; hence my choice of the case study strategy. 4.6 Choice of Research Method In any research, the researcher is normally confronted with the choice of method to employ in data collection and analysis. A researcher may choose either a qualitative method or a quantitative method or a blend of both methods (normally referred to as mixed methods). Quantitative vs. Qualitative This study is exploratory; and in exploratory research, there are two kinds of approaches- the quantitative approach or qualitative approach. Quantitative research refers to the research techniques that seek to measure data and, apply some form of statistical analysis. On the contrary, qualitative research is mainly an exploratory design, which is unstructured and based on small samples, with the aim of to providing insight and understanding. 73 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh When it comes to making a choice, Malhotra and Birks (2006) point out that, assertive positions (i.e. which approach is perceived to give the most accurate understanding of the phenomenon (or phenomena)) are often taken in favor of either qualitative or quantitative research by both researchers and decision-makers alike. Many quantitative researchers are quick to dismiss qualitative studies completely because they believe it provides no valid findings – indeed as being little better than journalistic accounts (ibid). They further assert that qualitative researchers ignore representative sampling, with their findings based on a single case or only a few cases (Malhotra & Birks, 2006). Some qualitative researchers too firmly reject statistical and other quantitative methods as yielding shallow or completely misleading information. They believe that to understand some phenomenon such as cultural values and consumer behavior, involves interviewing or intensive field observation. Strauss and Corbin in 1998, posit that qualitative researchers see qualitative techniques as the only method of data collection sensitive enough to capture the differences in consumer attitudes, motives and behavior. According to Wilson and Hutchinson (1996), there is a close parallel in the distinctions between exploratory and conclusive research and qualitative and quantitative research. Quantitative research involves the use of structured questions where the response options have been predetermined and a large number of respondents is involved. That‘s, a large sample and structured questionnaire make up quantitative research. A researcher is able to measure and analyze data as well as establish a detailed relationship between an independent and dependent variables using the quantitative approach. This is possible because quantitative research gives room for more objectivity about the findings of the research. It is most appropriate for testing hypotheses in experiments because of its ability to measure data using statistics. However, Burns and Bush (2000) points that in quantitative research, the context of the study is ignored. Unlike qualitative research, quantitative research does not study things in a natural setting. 74 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Also, large samples are always preferred in quantitative research. This is because the larger the sample, the more statistically correct the results will be. On the other hand, qualitative research involves an explanatory and realistic approach to the world. According to Denzin and Lincoln (2005), qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings, attempting to make sense of, or interpret phenomena in terms of the meaning people give them. As a result, qualitative research provides an in-depth examination of the phenomenon in question. It, as well, examines complex questions which cannot be possible with quantitative research. In addition, it is not limited to rigidly definable variables. However, it is very expensive and labor-intensive as well as time consuming to use qualitative research. As a result of its subjectivity, there are procedural problems associated with qualitative approach. This also makes replicability very difficult for researchers, not to mention that the qualitative approach is riddled with researcher bias as result of its subjective nature. In spite of all these complexities, this study adopts the qualitative research approach because according to Creswell (2007), it is gives holistic account. In other words, it develops a complex picture of the phenomenon under study. Hence, the qualitative research approach in this study provides a complete account of entrepreneurial leadership. Also, the researcher seeks to understand how transformational entrepreneurs in Ghana understand entrepreneurial leadership and whether it influences the growth of their enterprise(s) in any way. 4.7 Types of data As identified by Ghauri and Gronhaug (2005), the two sources used in collecting data are primary and secondary sources. Hence, the origin of the data is the main difference between primary data and secondary data (Patzer, 1995). Both can be of extreme importance to a researcher. Malhotra (2007) labelled the type of data invented by the researcher to specifically address the research problem as primary data. It is custom-made just for the imminent problem. 75 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Secondary data, conversely, are data collected for some goal other than the problem at hand, but has some significance to the current research (Hair, Wolfinbarger, Ortinau, & Bush, 2008; Malhotra, 2007). Some examples of secondary data include data generated within an organization, information made available by business and government sources, commercial marketing research firms, and computerized databases. Using secondary data is cost-effective and provides a quick source of background information. In contrast, primary data is regarded as more authentic and reliable as well as objective since it has not been published yet (Patzer, 1995). Primary data has a higher validity than secondary data because it has not been altered by anybody. Among the numerous advantages of primary data include greater control of data, address of specific issues, more efficient budget spending, and so on and so forth. However, primary data is very expensive and time consuming. Secondary data, on the contrary, is relatively cheaper and easier to obtain but it is prone to distortion and therefore has less reliability and validity value. Thus, the researcher chooses to use primary data in order to avoid distortion and inconsistencies that come with secondary data. Also, although secondary data is cheap, there is no readily available secondary data on transformational entrepreneurs and how their entrepreneurial leadership have influenced the growth of their business in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana, hence the researcher’s choice of primary data. 4.8 Population and Sampling A population refers to the total of all the elements, sharing some common set of characteristics, which comprises the universe for the purpose of the marketing research problem. A sample is a subgroup of the elements of the population selected for participation in the study; and a sample frame consists of a list or set of directions for identifying the target population 76 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh (Malhotra & Birks, 2006; 2007). In this research, the population includes all SMEs in Ghana, and the sampling frame includes transformational entrepreneurs in the Greater Accra Region, who have been enlisted on the Ghana Club 100 at one point in time. This means that once an entrepreneur’s firm has made it to the Ghana Club 100, that entrepreneur is a transformational entrepreneur. The sample therefore refers to the people the researcher selected for the interview. As noted by Malhotra and Birks (2006), a number of qualitative elements such as:(1) the importance of the decision, (2) the nature of the research, (3) the number of variables, (4) the nature of the analysis, (5) sample sizes used in similar studies, (6) incidence rates, (7) completion rates, and (8) resource constraints were taken into consideration when determining the sample size; thus, the sample size for this research is four (4). The researcher chose four respondents because according to Baker, Edwards & Doidge (2012), one respondent is enough provided that respondent provides the needed information. Also, Creswell (2007), suggests that between four to five respondents is appropriate for a multiple case study. Sampling Techniques There are the two main types of sampling techniques: probability sampling and non-probability sampling (Malhotra & Birks, 2006). Probability Sampling Saunders et al, (2009) explain that with probability sampling each member of the population has equal chance or probability of being selected. In other words, every individual in the population has the same opportunity of being selected. Also, Malhotra & Birks (2006) refers to probability sampling as the sampling procedure in which each element of the population has a fixed probabilistic chance of being selected for the sample. Consequently, probability 77 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh sampling is often associated with survey and experimental research strategies (Saunders et al, 2009). They further indicated that across disciplines, four types of probability sampling are generally accepted techniques standard. These include; random sampling (i.e. it refers to the random choosing an individual or sample from a sampling frame); systematic sampling (i.e. this involves selecting a sample at even intervals from the sample frame); stratified random sampling (i.e. it involves dividing the sample into two or more strata and later using either random sampling or systematic sampling to select from each strata); and cluster sampling (i.e. this involves the division of the population into discrete groups and later selecting the sample from the groups). In probability sampling, sampling units (a single element or group of elements subject to selection in the sample (Zikmund, 1994), are selected by chance. Non-Probability Sampling On the other hand, non-probability sampling is a sampling technique in which the sampling units are selected based on the personal judgments of the researcher. According to Saunders et al (2009) and Barnett (1991), there are four different categories of non-probability sampling: (1) quota sampling, which is a two-stage, restricted judgmental sampling. It ensures that the various subgroups of the population will be represented on certain key characteristics to the exact extent that the investigator desires (Zikmund, 1994). (2) Snowball sampling is the type of non-probability sampling where the first group of respondents is selected randomly, and then the second group are selected based on the recommendations of the first group. (3) Judgmental sampling (also known as purposive sampling) is a form of convenience sampling in which the population elements are selected based on the experience and beliefs (what the researcher deem as appropriate characteristic) of the researcher. Babbie (1990) also suggests that the researcher can select based on his/her own knowledge about the population, its elements, and the nature of the research aims. The last but not the least is convenience sampling where the researcher obtains the sample units that are most conveniently available to him/her 78 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh (Zikmund, 1994). The selection of sampling units is left primarily to the interviewer (Malhotra & Birks, 2006). Marshall (1996) explained that researchers use this technique because it is the least costly, in terms of time, effort and money. Malhotra and Birks (2006) explain that often, respondents are selected because they happen to be in the right place at the right time. In this study, the researcher uses the non-probability sampling technique (i.e. convenience and snowballing) to select the respondents. These sampling techniques (i.e. convenience and snowballing) rely on the researcher’s own judgement (Malhotra & Birks, 2007). The researcher used convenience sampling because the sample units are based in Accra and also, the researcher sees some of the people very often. Due to the nature of the study, the researcher chose the respondents based on the fact that they are Ghanaian entrepreneurs who have ‘transformed’ their businesses (through innovation & creativity, proactiveness, good leadership among others) over the years and have achieved some level of significant growth, hence their recognition to be enlisted on the Ghana Club 100. Anecdotal evidence also shows that coming by such top-notch entrepreneurs could be a frustrating process (due to their busy schedules and other encumbrances), thus, a snowballing technique was used to get some of the respondents. That is to say that, after interviewing the first respondent, he recommended another entrepreneur of his caliber to the researcher. This eased the respondent acquisition process for the researcher. Sampling size As indicated above, the researcher chose equal number of two males and two females to avoid gender biases or any unfair influence of gender on the validity and reliability of the study results. 79 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 4.9 Data Collection Instrument According to Malhotra and Birks (2007), there are four data collection instruments, viz.; participant observation, personal interviews, telephone interviews and self-administered questionnaires used in collecting primary data. Creswell (2009) also identified some common data collection instruments that are exclusive to qualitative researchers. These are interviews, observation, documents, and audio-visual materials. Other scholars add pictures, archival records, and physical artefacts (Miles, Huberman & Saldana, 2013; Saunders et al, 2009; Yin, 2015). Each of these data source brings strength to the findings as these different strands of data are joined together to enable the researcher understand the entire phenomenon (Baxter & Jack, 2008; Teyi, 2014). Bhattacherjee (2012) is of the view that, qualitative researchers generally employ qualitative methods such as unstructured interviews and participant observation to study a social phenomenon. According to Kajornboon (2005), interviews are systematic ways of collecting information through talking and listening to individuals who may provide relevant data for a research. Interviews can be structured or unstructured and can be implemented with one or more persons. They can also be done over the phone. Creswell (2009) however cautions that the responsibility lies on the researcher to understand and report the meanings that participants give to their experiences, as well as taking measures to restrict meanings that the researcher would have regarding the issue. Interviews are appropriate to use when you want to know the underlying reasons for respondents' standpoint. Patton (2002; p. 278) opined that the “purpose of interviewing is to find out what is in and on someone else’s mind.” Thus, the researcher used personal interviews to collect data in order to: 80 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh a) To explore how Ghanaian entrepreneurs understand the concept of entrepreneurial leadership. b) To evaluate the effect(s) of entrepreneurial leadership or the lack of it on SME growth. c) To identify the challenges faced by entrepreneurial leaders in achieving SME growth. d) To evaluate the effect(s) of entrepreneurial leadership on SME growth. Additionally, Patton (2002) outlined some frequently used interview techniques such as standardised open-ended interviews, informal conversational interviews, the general interview guide approach and close, fixed response interview. Also, since “the quality of the information obtained during an interview is largely dependent on the interviewer” (Patton, 1990; p. 279), the researcher employed semi-structured in-depth interview, with questions drawn from the interview guide (see Appendix 1) for the study. Where necessary, informal conversational (follow-up) questions were also asked to gain better clarification of their understanding of the concept(s) under study. In the process, some additional information were volunteered (Baxter & Jack, 2008). Furthermore, the interviewer started with some pep talk to break the ice, and just before the interview began, the interviewer asked permission to record and also assure them of utmost confidentiality. As much as possible, the interviewer used simple English that the interviewees would understand. To ensure that accurate responses were captured, the researcher periodically asked for clarification and confirmation. The interviewer also ensured a cordial atmosphere by not showing disapproval nor personal opinions for any of the answers. This made the respondents feel at ease and ready to provide the information needed for the study. The researcher used the smartphone to record the interview proceedings and paused, anytime there were some interruptions. This is because all but one of the interviews took place in the 81 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh respondents’ offices. This made the respondent feel comfortable knowing that their normal business dealings were off record. Also manual records were taken as back-up. This is because the second interview had to be redone because some phone calls interrupted the recordings (i.e. it automatically stopped the recording on the phone. After that experience, the phone was put on flight mode before commencing all the other interviews. After each interview session, the researcher thanked the respondents and reassured them of confidentiality after which interviewees advised the researcher on life and business issues. After the interviews, the researcher transcribed all the recordings. It was a tedious and time- consuming process. However, it was necessary as it enabled the researcher become familiar with the scripts and made analysis more effective. 4.10 Data Analysis Creswell (2013) suggests that the type of qualitative research strategy will determine the type of analysis that will be carried out. For instance, in ethnographic studies the most appropriate form of analysis is the conversational analysis. Also, in grounded theory research, the most appropriate data analysis is coding. For case studies, either content analysis or thematic analysis can be used to analyze the data gathered, however, Saldana (2009) is of the view that thematic analysis is appropriate for all qualitative studies. Therefore, since this study employs the case study strategy, it will adopt the thematic data analysis in analyzing the data collected from the interviews. Braun and Clarke (2006) in their paper “Using thematic analysis for qualitative study”, described thematic analysis as one of the foundational qualitative analysis. Thematic analysis can be defined as “a method for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) within Data” (Braun & Clarke, 2006; p. 6). Holloway and Todres (2003) also described thematic 82 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh analysis as a type of qualitative analysis done based on the underlying theme the study is based on and which has also been discussed in literature. According to the researchers the themes, include important topics that are in relation to the research objectives formulated. The study adopted to use thematic analysis because of its flexibility as has been discussed by Smith and Osborn (2003) and Hutchby and Wooffitt (1998); and the ability to easily identify the themes for data analysis for the study from the literature and research questions. The qualitative analysis aims to highlight the underlying pattern and processes that exist in the data by finding the leading words explaining the content (Miles, Huberman, & Saldana, 2013). The analysis will be conducted based on the thematic qualitative process; the pattern of leading key words comes from the theory and secondary data. Thus, by transcribing the interview and establishing the connection with the questions, relevant data is drawn. The following coding will therefore be used for the transcription. The first respondent will be coded as MK, the second respondents will be named as GC, the third respondent will be identified as DA; and the last respondent will be codded as AJ. The interviewer will be coded as I (interviewer). 4.11 Time Horizon of the study The two main fundamental time horizons used in research are cross-sectional and the longitudinal time horizons. Saunders et al (2009) refers to the cross-sectional time horizon as the “snapshot” and the longitudinal time horizon as the “diary,” or a study conducted over a period of time (usually above one year). Boateng (2014) however identifies a third time horizon referred to as the time series. Saunders et al (2009) further stress that the “time horizons to research design are independent of which research strategy you are pursuing or your choice of method” (p. 148). 83 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Cross-sectional study Cross-sectional studies refer to the study of a particular phenomenon (or phenomena) at a particular time (Saunders et al, 2009). Malhotra and Birks (2006) also add that in cross- sectional studies, the researcher collects information from any given sample of population elements only once. A lot of academic research projects are necessarily time constrained. Though cross-sectional studies often employ the survey strategy (Easterby-Smith, Lyles, & Tsang, 2008; Robson, 2002), they can also be used in qualitative methods. This is because many case studies are based on interviews conducted over a short period of time. This study therefore employs the cross sectional time horizon because the interviews were conducted over a short period of time (i.e. two weeks). 4.12 Validity and Argument Reliability The necessary steps were taken to ensure both content and construct validity. In line with Si and Bruton (2005), the researcher conducted a face-to-face interview with all the respondents and also assessed their businesses. In addition, a summary of the findings were given to all respondents to confirm if they have been well represented, and also make suggestions (Goodwill, Mayo, & Hill, 1997). Thus, the researcher can confidently defend the credibility, reliability and validity of the results. 4.13 Ethical Considerations As recommended by Miles and Huberman (1994), ethical considerations are paramount and the onus lies on the researcher to be sincere with respondents, and also treat the confidential information appropriately. These were adhered to during the data collection process. In accordance with this, the researcher allowed the respondents to take part in the research voluntarily (meaning, neither of them was forced nor threatened to join in the research), and also ensured that participants were not harmed in anyway. Verbal permission was sought form 84 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh each respondent before any digital recording was done. In all, participants were also assured that the study is for academic purposes only. Also, the privacy of all the respondents was protected as codes (i.e. MK, representing Respondent 1; GC, representing Respondent 2; DA, representing Respondent 3; and AJ representing Respondent 4) were given to them to conceal their identity. 85 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER FIVE DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS 5.0 Introduction This chapter presents the analysis of the results as well as the discussion on the findings from the four cases. The interpretations related to the findings are in tandem with the main objectives of this study and some emerging issues that came out from the responses. Extracts from the interviews which support the presentation of the findings, were coded using letters (i.e. MK, representing Respondent 1; GC, representing Respondent 2; DA, representing Respondent 3; and AJ representing Respondent 4) in order to ensure anonymity. 5.1 Presentation of findings This section reports the data obtained from the interview sessions. The information received are grouped under themes to address the research objectives and questions raised in chapter one. 5.1.1 Characteristics of the Respondents The table below (Table 5.1.1) shows that a total of four respondents who have collectively been in business for over 100 years took part in the study. Each of the respondents is over fifty years old, and a well-educated CEO in his/her company, with the least qualification being a Master’s degree. In addition, all respondents are married with children, except one who is a single parent. Of the four respondents, two of them are males and the other two are females. All respondents are above 50 years old and are leaders in their field of endeavour. 86 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 5.1.1: Characteristics of the Respondents RESPONDENT PROFILE MK He is a renowned pharmacist in his late sixties. He is the CEO of Company X and has been in business for over three decades. He’s well educated and is currently in the third year of his PhD studies, although he has a Doctor of Science honorary causa from Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. Company X comprises of at least twelve other subsidiaries. MK is married with nine children, and has won many awards (See Exhibit 1) to his credit. He has also served a number of boards such as; Ghana Red Cross Society, Pentecost University Council, Ghana Investments Promotion Center, Centre for Scientific and Industrial Research, and among others. GC She is a US & UK trained Medical Aesthetician with over thirty years’ experience in the Beauty Therapy Industry. She is currently the Chief Executive Officer of Company Y which consists of six other subsidiaries all in Accra, Ghana. Her products are enjoying good patronage amongst black people in the Diaspora and Africa. GC is married with three children and has won a number of prestigious awards (See Exhibit 2) due to her invaluable contribution to the beauty therapy industry in Ghana. She also serves a number of boards including; Association of certified Entrepreneurs, Ghana Association of Women Entrepreneurs, Executive Member of Chartered Institute of Marketing, Ghana (CIMG), British Association of Beauty Therapists & Cosmetologists and a host of many others. DA He is a well-educated man in his early sixties with over thirty years’ of international experience in business. He can be referred to as “jack of all trade” due to the diverse nature of his business. DA is the CEO of Z group of companies, which constitutes six other companies with several branches in Ghana and Europe. He is a husband to one wife and a father of seven children. He gained international recognition and won an award in Geneva. He has also won other awards to his credit. AJ She is a strong-willed woman in her late fifties, who has been in the total event management business for a little over two decades. She is currently the CEO of Q Limited. Q Limited has four other subsidiaries that offers services such as construction, interior decoration, horticulture and landscaping, and purchasing and supply. She is well-educated with her current qualification is an MA in Business Administration (Human Resource Management option). AJ is a single mother of two. She has won several awards. Some of which include Most Outstanding Interior Design Professional at the Feminine Ghana Achievement Awards 2016 and Event Management Entrepreneur Of the year 2015 at the Ghana Entrepreneur Awards 2016. In that same year she was also recognized as a designate (to represent the Ghanaian woman entrepreneur) at the Japan-Africa Business Women Exchange Seminar in Tokyo, Japan. She has served on a number of boards including the Board of Microfinance and Small Loan Centre (MASLOC). Source: Researcher’s own developed from Field data, 2017 87 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.1.2 Understanding entrepreneurial leadership In order to achieve the first objective (i.e. to explore how Ghanaian entrepreneurs understand the concept of entrepreneurial leadership), the researcher asked a number of questions (i.e. six questions) to help expose the respondents’ understanding of entrepreneurial leadership. When asked “How do you understand the concept of entrepreneurial leadership?” the respondents have this to say: “….. Well, I understand entrepreneurial leadership as someone who can create jobs- not only fixed to one job but who can create other jobs; innovate other things- services or products that are available and lead the staff to organize new things. Entrepreneurial leadership is a pacesetter. If you are an entrepreneurial leader, then I believe that you should bring out new things for people to rather copy you, not you copying other people.” –MK “I think entrepreneurial leadership is… is the ability of leaders and entrepreneurs to conceive the ideas number one and two; start implementing it, not only implement it but try and get all the other resources such as human, capital and everything and more importantly be able to work through others to also achieve that goal or whatever they have.” – GC ‘My understanding of entrepreneurial leadership is someone who mobilizes people, directs them and taking the risks. [] Yeah, I think that’s my little understanding of entrepreneurial leadership, you have to mobilize people, being proactive, taking risk, like being entrepreneurially oriented, ahaaa. If you are entrepreneurial leader, you must be entrepreneurially oriented; meaning that you have to take risk, you have to be proactive, create self-autonomy, and being competitively aggressive.” – DA “Entrepreneurial leadership is the leadership that directs. You have become a figure. [….] Some people who are also meant to be at the second level who will look up to the entrepreneur 88 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh because the entrepreneur is a risk taker. Not many people have that- the oomph to take risk and then when they get their fingers burnt, they back out. An entrepreneur is a leader who directs the path of the business” -AJ From the responses above, it appears respondents have an idea of what entrepreneurial leadership is all about. While all respondents try to link entrepreneurship and leadership concepts in explaining entrepreneurial leadership, it seems the gender of participants play a role in how they perceive entrepreneurial leadership. For instance, the males’ understanding of entrepreneurial leadership is inclined toward an entrepreneurship approach as seen in MK’s response “Well, I understand entrepreneurial leadership as someone who can create jobs- not only fixed to one job but who can create other jobs; innovate other things- services or products that are available and lead the staff to organize new things”; while the females view the concept is inclined toward a leadership approach. This is evident in AJ’s response “Entrepreneurial leadership is the leadership that directs... An entrepreneur is a leader who directs the path of the business.” 5.1.2.1 Description of an Entrepreneurial leader Having shared their view on the meaning of entrepreneurial leadership, the researcher asked the respondents to describe who entrepreneurial leaders are, and whether or not they are one? All respondents claim to be entrepreneurial leaders because they believe they possess some attributes such as: the ability to spot opportunities, take risks, be innovative, proactive, motivate/influence, and being visionaries. The exact responses obtained from the field study are stated below: I think so. I think so. Because I create and share. I have 16 subsidiaries of my company, so which means that I can easily organize business in any form. If I’m into farming, I’m into pharmaceuticals, I’m into printing, I’m into microfinance, that should tell you that I’m an 89 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh entrepreneur; and a leader means I get my staff, my people to follow me willingly, and to me I’m an entrepreneurial leader. –MK “He should not be risk-averse. […] He should also be able to invest. […] You should be somebody who is a team player, … because as you know now entrepreneurship and business generally globally is now talking about networking and partnership because the truth is that nobody has… you know, you have something but others too have something and when they join it, it will move it. Entrepreneurial leader is somebody who thinks about two or three generations ahead. I think somebody who also gives back to society.... of course you have to be innovative and… I think… that’s why I’m telling you that she’s an ideas factory….” -GC “I’ll say entrepreneurial leader is someone who will influence his people, to achieve or let me say mobilize people… people are resources. So somebody who maybe have identified an opportunity and mobilizing people to achieve something. Yes, I’m one based on the description we just gave, I fall in most of the attributes.” –DA “I had to do an article and which was in relation with entrepreneurship. (Reading from the article) entrepreneurship is about creativity and innovation to provide solutions to unmet needs. So an entrepreneur always looks at where the society is lacking and where he or she can also make money. […] So you have to look at unmet needs and see how you can carve you niche wherever you want to. Entrepreneurship is also about providing employment to others and supporting them with their growth and development. [….] You must be a visionary…Risk taking.” - AJ It can also be inferred from the response that, Ghanaian women entrepreneurs believe that giving back to society one unique characteristic of an entrepreneurial as said by GC “…I think 90 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh somebody who also gives back to society....” and AJ “Entrepreneurship is also about providing employment to others and supporting them with their growth and development.” 5.1.2.2 Innovativeness When asked to explain the various adjectives used in describing who an entrepreneurial leader is, all participants explain innovativeness as either creating something new or enhancing something or adding value to something. It is thus obvious that all participants have very similar views to explaining the innovativeness dimension of an entrepreneurial leader. Below are their responses: “Of course, to bring out new things. And for now under the sun, God has created everything, so whatever we are doing, we are just adding value to it. Yes, and to me that is innovative.” – MK “Innovation… your product…product development is very important ... We’ve improved upon our products … In terms of our courses that we do here we’re always looking at ways we can improve the courses, content wise and everything. Our business processes we’re also looking at ways of improving it, making sure that our clients are satisfied. So innovation cuts across.” –GC. Interestingly, GC adds that as a social entrepreneur finding different avenues of sustaining an NGO’s operations (rather than seeking external aid), is one way of innovating. “So the very smart entrepreneur, social entrepreneur for that matter will say okay “Let’s find avenues of sustaining our operations … Last year it was about asking somebody to give you money, this year it’s about you yourself making the money’’ “Creativity is developing something, pretty much out of nothing or enhancing that thing to become a better product. Innovative and procedure are linked. You must have an opened mind for new things. You shouldn’t be myopic in your thinking.” –AJ 91 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Surprisingly, one respondent believes that innovation is what enables an entrepreneurial leader “to remain in business.” It is a “byproduct,” which is triggered as a result of competition. An extract of the interview is provided below. DA: … I mean, you don’t just start innovating, innovation comes in when you are facing competition, when challenges are coming, then you have to innovate to be able to remain in business. You understand, so innovation to me is (for lack of better words), let me say a byproduct. … again it’s the competition because you want to create value for your customers and so you must innovate. Sometimes by cutting down cost along the line, so that your product can still be cheaper, so that the cost of you know, you can still make the same profit. It’s a way of innovation. ... You see, innovation does not necessarily mean new products…..eeerm, you see, for instance, you see this bottle of water … and you want to innovate, so you can just add a feature. It’s an innovation. You see, the product doesn’t change, but something that can add value to the customer is innovation. I: So is creativity at play here? DA: In fact creativity is the source of innovation. If you are not creative, you cannot be innovative. Let me say, creativity is the antecedent of innovation.” –Excerpt of Respondent DA’s interview. 5.1.2.3 Proactiveness On the issue of proactiveness, all respondents agree that entrepreneurs see issues (it may be challenges/opportunities) ahead and take initiative to respond or take the necessary action. This is how MK puts it, “I don’t wait until things are done before. I can see problems ahead. Proactive means you see things and you work on them before they would even arrive.” DA, on the other hand, links proactiveness to taking advantage of opportunities. He said “Well, I understand an entrepreneur’s proactiveness to be mobilizing resources to achieve an outcome 92 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh (let’s say your mission/vision). Ahaaa, that’s proactiveness; pro-active” AJ related her explanation of proactiveness to her story (see Appendix 2 Respondent AJ’s transcription) about the German brothers. She answers, “In the case of the German, he was proactive. He didn’t sit down. He was not reactive. He went for the opportunity.” Interestingly, one respondent is of the view that being proactive includes dealing with issues quickly, as and when they arise- “J: You should be an action person. That is it. If there’s a problem, don’t sit down and play commentary about the problem, stand up and do something…” -GC 5.1.2.4 Risk-taking When asked how they understood risk-taking, all participants admit that no one is uncertain of what the future has in store. Thus, any investment or initiative undergone by the entrepreneurial leader is risky as the person is unsure of the outcome as seen in MK’s response “… Sometimes you lose, sometimes you gain…” Surprisingly, Respondent DA brings to light that the risk in question is a “calculated risk,” i.e. not putting all your investments into a particular project. “Oh yeah, because you don’t know the future. The future you don’t know it so, entrepreneurs take risk, but it must be a calculated risk. Calculated risk is you know, you don’t put all your eggs in one basket. Ahaaa, if you do that, and it falls, you lose everything.” -DA It is also observed that Respondent GC shares in this assertion- “He should not be risk-averse. […] the opportunity that the average person and for that matter the average woman would run away from, she will take it […]. He should also be able to invest. You know risk comes with investment. We are always constantly trying some many things at the same time.” In relation to AJ’s story, she also adds that risk-taking also includes venturing into “unknown terrain. … And risk taking also has to do with funding. Some people are very scared of taking loans. If you are an entrepreneur and you are afraid of loans, goodnight.” 93 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.1.2.5 Visionary Pertaining to entrepreneurial leaders being visionaries, participants concur that being visionary is in relation to the future. Thus, the entrepreneurial leader’s ability to see ahead of time (i.e. into the future) is what makes him or her a visionary. The question of explaining an entrepreneur is a visionary resulted in the following responses: “To be able to see in advance, a vision, like a dream. To see things in advance so you see opportunities, business opportunities in advance.” –MK “Entrepreneurial leader is somebody who thinks about two or three generations ahead- Visionary. You should be visionary. Don’t think about yourself. You should think generations ahead of you.” -GC “Yeah, entrepreneurs are visionaries. You see if you don’t have vision… Vision is futuristic. What you want to achieve maybe in the next 5 years, 10 years, 20 years, ok, that is your vision. So what an entrepreneur does is that (s)he has to craft strategies, how to get, how to achieve that, ok… ” –DA One respondent on the other hand, reveals that being a visionary is an important element of entrepreneurial leadership and hence, uses the word “must” to connote a necessary variable. This is how AJ puts it “You must be a visionary.” 5.1.2.6 Influencer/Motivator All interviewees intimate that entrepreneurial leaders exert some amount of influence on the society within which they operate. MK states that “In a society when you are a leader, you influence, you advice, you are a counselor, you are a director, you are a consultant. So you are everything to everybody. Yeah.” Also, the entrepreneurial leader influences their employees, as well as motivate them to achieve organizational goals. All participants use things such as money, vacations, education, among others to motivate their employees. For instance, “I motivate my employees by giving them little tips here and there. Paying them sometimes for 94 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh their overtime, giving them some days off after a hectic time. I also motivate them by sending them outside the country. Some of them have gone on holidays, some of them have gone to school. Funding some of them to go to school in South Africa, China, and Dubai. ….” –AJ One respondent however leaves the option to his employees to decide and choose what motivates them. He states that “I allow them to do things that they themselves want to do. Not necessarily keep increasing their pay, or you know, I do that. But I think what has made a lot of impact is allowing them to achieve the height that they themselves wanted to while working for/with me.” –DA Ironically, another respondent believes in “self-motivation.” She explains that self-motivation reflects in an employees’ output, attitude and energy level among others. “I strongly believe in self-motivation. … Number one. Number two, she also believes in being encouraging. … She doesn’t want anything to deflate you so she’ll do whatever she can to advise you. She’ll encourage you.” -GC Similarly, another respondent believes that he’s doing his best, thus when employees don’t perform or deliver, it breaks his heart. With emotions he said “….And so when they disappoint me, I get heart broken. I have taken the person on an excursion, give you good salary, give you accommodation, thinking that I’m doing my best so that you’ll not leave….” –MK 5.1.2.7 Instances that make respondents believe that they are entrepreneurial leaders The researcher further asked respondent to state ways in which they have been innovative, proactive, risk-taker, visionary and motivator. This question was asked in order to ascertain whether indeed the respondents understood the adjectives they used in describing an entrepreneurial leader, and could relate to it. Participants confirmed that they understood the words that they used and cited instances which made them eligible to be classified as an entrepreneurial leader. Gender did not have any significant impact on the explanations of the words used. These are their responses: 95 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh “Because I create and share. I have 16 subsidiaries of my company, so which means that I can easily organize business in any form. If I’m into farming, I’m into pharmaceuticals, I’m into printing, I’m into microfinance, that should tell you that I’m an entrepreneur; and a leader means I get my staff, my people to follow me willingly, and to me I’m an entrepreneurial leader … God has created everything, so whatever we are doing, we are just adding value to it. Yes, and to me that is innovative … I don’t wait until things are done before I can see problems ahead… I create businesses that do not work, and I don’t really mind if they did not work. Sometimes you lose, sometimes you gain, and so I see myself as a risk lover… Yeah, if I create new businesses then that means you have the vision, and I think I’m a visionary.” –MK “…she started a business and now we have so many people. But she started alone and then her husband bought into it [….] now the children too… […] the opportunity that the average person and for that matter the average woman would run away from, she will take it […].You should be somebody who is a team player, a strong team player is somebody who is selfless. … You should think generations ahead of you. I think somebody who also gives back to society… We travel to the Volta region and do donations and all that from her pocket […] You want this to be done and somebody is just delaying your time so she just… before I realised she’s gone down and come back [….] the problem is solved. She is just too proactive… Motivation? She strongly believes in self-motivation. She normally likes people who are self- motivated... Number two, she also believes in being encouraging […] … and then she generally encourages. Her personality is really motivating […] It takes an entrepreneur who is thinking outside the box. … Innovation… We’ve improved upon our products … the courses, content wise and everything … business processes … It takes somebody who is crazy. It doesn’t take an ordinary person on 96 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh the street. It takes someone who is crazy. My boss says she is someone who is a rebel. […] She is. She really is. She is an entrepreneurial leader. Trust me over the years I’ve seen her build other companies within the beauty industry, you would be amazed. She’s not only about FC, all the other companies.” -GC “Eeerm, (thought about it for a while) I must say my innovation has rather come from diversifying, because that has made me stay in business; and also because when you take DA for instance, we supply products, products manufactured by other people, you understand, so the innovation we do is to rather see where people need the items, yeah. …taking the same products to a different place, a new market…. Yeah. A lot of people have copied me. For instance, I can boast of myself as the first person to bring projectors, overhead projectors to Ghana, the first person as a dealer to Ghana… And then a lot of people just copied. …For instance, global wallet was a product that the Ghana Association of Forex Bureau and Visa. It’s a product that we came… it’s our product and the bank of Ghana said we cannot do it on our own, and that we can do it through a bank. And that was how Zenith Bank came in, and now everybody is doing it.… Yeah. Absolutely, I’ve taken risks so much. For instance, recently, I took over a company, let me say Company A. Company A was a company I was running with South Korean partners, and now the Koreans have pulled out, and so I have to take over the company. It was a big risk because …. I’m taking over both the assets and liabilities… So in fact I went into it and I’m just stuck at a crossroads; did I get it right or I got it wrong? … Visionary because I’ve been able to achieve more than 70% of the things that I wanted to do. These are things that I said maybe in five years’ time, and I’ve been able to achieve them. So if visions are futuristic, and I’ve been able to achieve them, then I can call myself a visionary…I’m a motivator because a 97 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh lot of people have been able to achieve their dreams through me. Most of my workers who hold master’s degree, etc. they started with SSS and went to the university, did their master’s and they are still working for me…Yeah, a lot who have even copied me have left doing the same thing that I’m doing...” – DA “I started the business with nothing. Somebody paid me for his plan and I kept ploughing it back but when I got to a certain stage, even the bank that I was banking with saw that I was labouring. I could not keep up and they offered a loan. I didn’t blink, I took it… I could invest in things which could make us more visible. My motivation has been always to, first of all is to provide for my family. Secondly which is more important is, to give back to society. I motivate my employees by giving them little tips here and there. Paying them sometimes for their overtime, giving them some days off after a hectic time. I also motivate them by sending them outside the country. Some of them have gone on holidays, some of them have gone to school. Funding some of them to go to school in South Africa, China, and Dubai… They always go on courses, professional courses, we know what we are doing. It’s a fluid thing and those people who are in that, we call ourselves creative. You have to be very dynamic and every time people are bringing out new things … We do interior decoration, we are into provision of construction materials and we also do a bit of construction on the side and pretty much we do a bit of purchasing of supply…” AJ Having received all these responses from the participants, the researcher believes that Ghanaian transformational entrepreneurs have a fair understanding of the concept of entrepreneurial leadership and are practicing it. The researcher theorises that this could probably results from the newness of the concept. Although the concept is being practiced in Ghana, Ghanaian entrepreneurs are not aware of it. This is evident in DA’s response, “…I see this concept to be more academic because when we are out there, some of these things are not major concerns to 98 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh us, the concern is how to achieve your mission, your vision… It’s not much of a focus whether you are entrepreneurial leader or whatever. The focus is how you achieve your vision.” 5.2 Human Capital of an entrepreneur and SME growth On the issue of the human capital of the entrepreneur, the researcher asked whether the entrepreneurs’ educational qualification, training, skills, as well as exposure and experience that he/she may have acquired have contributed to the growth of their enterprise. The researcher observed that all respondents have some education in management with the least form of educational qualification being a Master’s degree. Notable again was the fact that all participants have had prior working experience before setting up their own enterprises. Similarly, respondents have the opportunity of going outside the country to observe what goes on in other foreign markets as well as transact business. One respondent stated that, “…Education, I have observed that it’s a way bit of a success factor in business... The only advantage I have as a pharmacist is the English language, the fact that I can write reports, I can also manufacture with my interest in the profession. My exposure I’ll say is about 60% the success factor. Exposure in the sense that you see what others have done, then you can also copy. You can innovate whatever you know. Exposure by way of excursions is very, very important… Exposure in the sense of Christianity, my religion. It teaches me to be humble, and I think it’s also very crucial and very important in business… and travelling, travelling outside Ghana exposes the other side of Ghana, i.e. Europe and America how they run their pharmacy businesses. It has helped me to improve my services to the community… [for example] in Europe, pharmacy shops are also supermarkets. So whatever you need as a toiletry, you can get it in a pharmacy, so I introduce it in Ghana and I think it is helping. Right now I’ve added a snack bar, so as you wait for your prescription, you can always go to the snack bar and get something to munch.” –MK 99 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Another participant adds that, “… and I must say that my educational background and again my drive… It has actually brought me this far, because, for instance, accounting, I know very much accounting. Sometimes I prepare my own books and then give it to the auditors. So the educational background has been so helpful, very, very, very helpful to drive the company to this far… sometimes the supplier out there will want to have a personal, encounter with you… I have come this far because I have been out there meeting people who actually supply my goods, because you build more trust when they see you and sit down on a round table and talk business. So out there it has been so helpful that I meet the people who I do business with; I convince them at the round table that I can do this and I can do that. So it has been so helpful… I’m a broadcasting engineer. That has helped me a lot. Through that I have had several contracts especially in Nigeria. In Ghana here at a point I was rehabilitating GBC (Ghana Broadcasting Corporation), I do a lot of supply to them and other small small media houses like NAFTI, Radio Gold and Joy FM…” –DA Again, one respondent adds that, “I would say that education is pivotal to the sustenance of a business… You can build the business up to a certain level with a certain level of education but if you don’t augment yourself or hire people of higher learning, you will be stagnated… So education is very, very important… it has helped me in at least understanding the books… it also helps in communication… it also broadens your perspective. Once you are educated, you also seek to be educated a bit more, you see, you have a very curious mind and that helps. Because most of the time, what you start with is not what you end with. You can expand to various areas that are totally unrelated to what you started with…” -AJ AJ is however quick to add that, “I don’t want people to feel that if you don’t have education you cannot. If you don’t have education and you are willing to hire education and whiles the people are manning it, you are also learning. So in as much as you cannot write as well as them, you can give direction.” 100 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.3 Challenges of Entrepreneurial Leadership The issue of challenges was addressed by asking participants about the challenges they encounter in ensuring the growth of their enterprise. Additionally, respondents were asked to recall the challenges they encountered when they began their enterprises. These questions were asked to help the researcher ascertain if there are any similarities or differences in the challenges that face entrepreneurs in their early stages of business and after some level of growth. The responses are presented below in a tabular form: Table 5.3.1: Early Stages Challenges and current challenges of MK Early Stages Challenges Current Challenges … I didn’t have capital… Another challenge … Challenges confront us from all angles, was the staffing… when staff decide to and the most important one is the pilfer… Another challenge in our business is manpower… People poach a lot, and when expiry dates… political situation in the they poach, all the training that you have country. Taxes. Inflation… I woke up with my given to the person goes to naught… Money pharmacy all burnt down… legal issues… is another challenge… inflation is also very Armed robbers also have attacked me high, exchange rate is bad… before… -MK Source: Researcher’s own developed from Field data, 2017 Table 5.3.2: Early Stages Challenges and current challenges of GC Early Stages Challenges Current Challenges …She didn’t have a shop, she didn’t have The lack of affordable capital… the anything… she realised that she couldn’t do depreciating currency, frigidity, power it alone so she trained two people for free to fluctuations, the lack of technical skills… help… Oh the normal challenges human resource has always been a [Challenges includes access to finance, challenge. skilled labor, fluctuating exchange rate, high duties, high cost of running business, and changing the perception of beauty at the -GC initial stages of business start-up was also challenging.]… People don’t know you… Bleaching was in vogue then… Source: Researcher’s own developed from Field data, 2017 101 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 5.3.3: Early Stages Challenges and current challenges of DA Early Stages Challenges Current Challenges There were a lot of challenges… they will …the challenges that I had was rather within… if buy on credit and will not pay… Personally, you want to diversify, you take a chunk of money I never had enough money when I started. out… your working capital is reduced… venturing into the unknown…” -DA Source: Researcher’s own developed from Field data, 2017 Table 5.3.4: Early Stages Challenges and current challenges of AJ Early Stages Challenges Current Challenges … I didn’t have the experience… and then it First thing is attitude and if people don’t was not easy because I realized that I had to have the right attitude… Secondly, people give in other to receive… I started the who think they can poach… and challenges business with nothing. .. even the bank that I has always been finance… In our industry, was banking with saw that I was labouring. we are female biased… the challenge comes when you are going to meet men for jobs... You just have to be a woman but at times things like sexual harassment do happen. It is real… As for sexual harassment, it is real no matter how old you are… People also want to get into that industry. So the strain of trying to always keep ahead of the competition… -AJ Source: Researcher’s own developed from Field data, 2017 From the above Tables (i.e. Tables 5.3.1, 5.3.2, 5.3.3, & 5.3.4), the researcher notes that there are some unique challenge(s) faced by the entrepreneurial leaders. This is largely due to the fact that they operate in different industries. For instance, MK laments that “Another challenge in our business is expiry dates…” In another industry too, GC’s peculiar challenge was the fact that “Bleaching was in vogue then…” Interestingly, though respondents operate in different industries, certain challenges such as financial, human resource and infrastructure (assets) were common among them. Also, having compared the early challenges and current challenges, the notable difference was that in the early stages of the business, respondents cite finance as a major challenge, however after achieving a major transformation the prime challenge has to do with the human resource. This is because three respondents confess saying: 102 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh “… Challenges confront us from all angles, and the most important one is the manpower…” -MK “…human resource has always been a challenge…” -GC “First thing is attitude and if people don’t have the right attitude… Secondly, people who think they can poach…” -AJ The main problem associated with human resource as mentioned by two respondents is poaching. With emotions MK said “…People poach a lot, and when they poach, all the training that you have given to the person goes to naught…” however; AJ is quick to add that “…So people actually come into the thing and they think that it’s the employees who make the company thick. It is the entrepreneur that gives the direction. The employee is just a raw material. So the worker cannot have what is inside you… So it doesn’t really scare me when people poach.” Another respondent cited lack of technical skills to augment their business functions within the country. GC explains that “… the lack of technical skills because you’re starting a factory and you don’t have enough scientists, don’t have a lot of chemists, you don’t have a lot of formulators to formulate the products, you don’t have packaging experts, you don’t have all these things so the human resource to even manage the whole value chain is even a challenge. That’s how come we started the beauty college in the first place. She had the salon but you don’t have people so she had to train them. So human resource has always been a challenge...” Aside the human resource issue, all respondents admit that “finances will always be a challenge.” The other challenges such as taxes, inflation, power fluctuation, lack of affordable capital, exchange rate and/or depreciating currency, political stability, legal issues among others, are macro environmental issues that entrepreneurial leaders have no control over. Their only solution is to manage the various threats that these challenges pose. Again, DA remarked, 103 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh “…the challenges that I had was rather within… if you want to diversify, you take a chunk of money out… your working capital is reduced… Those are the big challenges because you are deploying- taking money into a different sector… venturing into the unknown…” This is because DA relies on diversification to grow the business. Thus, when the opportunity to diversify comes, money is withdrawn from the old sector into the new one, creating some form of stagnation in the old sector. In a highly masculine country (drawing from Hofstede’s study) like Ghana, the female entrepreneurial leaders in this study were asked if their gender (as females) have been a challenge to their business growth, and their response indicated the negative. They further explained that their feminine nature has not been a challenge largely because they operate in female-dominated industries. GC also indicated that “I have always refused to allow my gender to limit my business aspirations. Even though you get to face daunting challenges along the way, your response should always be that of defiance, strong will and commitment. I have always been a rebel - I find myself always challenging the status quo and doing things in sharp contrast to accepted conventions of the day. I can hardly recollect situations in which people’s disbelief in my abilities and my gender hindered my business goals. More importantly, I have a husband who is a partner, a friend, and a serious critic and allows me to develop myself in all facets of life. I do not lack the needed support in order to succeed in business.” However, AJ reveals that “…the challenge comes when you are going to meet men for jobs. You just have to be a woman but at times things like sexual harassment do happen. It is real. But you will have to stand your ground… As for sexual harassment, it is real no matter how old you are…” 5.3.1 Managing Challenges of Entrepreneurial Leaders In order to help upcoming transformational entrepreneurs, the researcher asked the respondents how they were able to overcome the various challenges that they mentioned earlier. All 104 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh participants agreed that challenges will always be there, at best, they only manage them. MK put it this way, “…they are with us. It’s like eeh…erh…erh… an albatross. Challenges are like an albatross hanging on your neck…” this statement then forced the researcher to rephrase the question to ask “how do you manage the challenges?” Some iconic remedies were suggested for upcoming entrepreneurial leaders to take into consideration. One respondent recommended, “You manage eeeerm… if you are not getting money from the banks, or from your friends, or any institutions; it means that you have to reduce your expenditure pattern; and you do things that are needful and not things that you want. And you also have to explain to the staff that you might not be able to increase salary this year- bonus might not come as much as 100% or 50% as usual. You have to understand it will come down. These are some of the management style, the strategies… you always have to explain things, you communicate with your staff, and when they understand, that will be fine. You also have to buy cheap- buying cheap does not mean you have to buy inferior quality things, but rather ask for discounts and commissions and cumulatively all these will add up to help you get your profit to manage financial crisis. When it comes to machine getting obsolete, you have to maintain them, which means you are going to get skillful technicians to maintain your machines for you. If you need to bring them from outside, the expatriates, they are so expensive, so you’ve got to know, you have to have the knowledge as to who is within the country, a Ghanaian for that matter, who can do your maintenance work for you. In our pharmaceutical world, we are confronted with expiry dates, expiry of our goods; so you have to keep an eye (a serious eye) on it. So you have a staff, whose responsibility is to check expiry date, so you can reduce the quantity of goods that will expire on you. So these are things that we use to manage.” –MK Another respondent recommended that, “…Challenges will always be there, you do your best to try and solve them but you can only do as much as you can. There are some of them that are 105 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh external. You know the business environment there is very little you do. It’s really influenced by external factors, government policy, general economic outlook, global economic trend and all that. Those you can do very little about. It is rather influenced by government policy and government interventions and all that government will be put about to help. So that one there’s very little. For instance if government says that everybody’s going to pay 40% VAT there’s very little you can do about it. It’s going to affect the business. But if government say we’re going to pay 3% flat rate it helps us. So there are somethings we can do very little about but the ones that we can do something about, we do much…. For instance, during power cuts, we brought in generators to control the situation” –GC 5.4 Effect(s) of Entrepreneurial leadership on SME growth 5.4.1 Number of employees (loyal) Relating to the effects of entrepreneurial leadership on SME growth, all respondents agree that exhibiting entrepreneurial leadership traits has reduced employee turnover leading to more loyal staff. All participants can boast of a staff strength of over fifty employees. Although, this may not be definite, the researcher posits that entrepreneurial leaders are able to retain employees as a result of their participatory/democratic leadership style. Thus entrepreneurial leaders manage by objectives (MBOs), such that they respect the views and suggestions made by their employees. These make employees feel part of the company, hence their obligation to be loyal. It is however worth mentioning that the male entrepreneurial leaders in this study have over hundred employees while the female entrepreneurial leaders can boast of over sixty employees. Probably, this may be as a result of the differences in the industry within which they operate and its optimum employee requirement, and the entrepreneurs’ own urge to either employ more people or not. The following responses is a testament to this. “The number of human beings that I’ve employed also tells me that the company is growing… It has helped me get loyal staff. Some of them have worked with me for the past 30 years, which 106 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh means that these attributes are good- good human relations, a good visionary, you are proactive- so I don’t wait until the staff have problems before I react- I have to see them in advance; give them accommodation, help them get T&T to come to work. All these things help the business to grow and it has helped my business as such. I started with one staff, who was my sister, and now we are over 300. It’s all signs of the growth.” –MK “We have over 70 staff that we are working with across board … She is a go-getter, she is someone who is a visionary. She is somebody who I’ll call a generational thinker […] leader… She is someone who…believes in teamwork, believes in developing people… So the leadership style, that of teamwork, teamwork, teamwork. Madam believes in developing people and building others… For me I think that it is because of the leadership style that is why we are where we are first off… My management style incorporates the value of humility, constant education and training and also keeping with latest trends and research and development (R&D)… We have someone who has worked with us for over 15years. […] there are people who have worked here for 10 years … People come to us to partner with us to sell their products […] We have someone who’s into wellness training in […] who want to partner with us. It will bring about growth. People always come to the school it is a first class…nobody wants to be a repeatee in the college. There’s a culture of growth so we keep on growing” –GC “…if you take our number of employees… Yeah, I started as a sole proprietorship and I was the only shareholder. Later on, I brought in my wife and children. Currently, I have over 150 employees at DASCO group… So I think that it has helped in that, I have somebody working with me here for about 30years now because of my leadership style. Otherwise, people would have left by now. Sometimes people marvel…. Yeah, I think in terms of the growth, I can attribute it to my influence, motivation, yeah; because when the challenges come, everybody look up to me. Yeah, I think I should tap my own shoulder and say ‘I’ve done well’ (doing the 107 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh gesture), because it’s not easy. Looking retrospectively, looking back, even from where I’m coming from…. But I give glory to God anyway. I give glory to God for how far he has brought me. That I’ve been able to make an impact into people’s lives, into my own life, yeah.” –DA “One (me). Then I added another, then another. So even having a work force of sixty two, I know my business has grown …and I think that because my strength is in employing young staff, they all look at me as a mother figure so to speak… have the experienced eye, I am able to direct them as to how to achieve what they need to achieve… For me I would say the best people to speak to is my workers because I have margins in the business because a lot of them have been going forward not less than five years. The highest person who has stayed with me longest is 18years ...” –AJ 5.4.2 Number of Subsidiaries and branches Respondents further add that due to the qualities that they possess as entrepreneurial leaders, they have been able to expand their business from the core business. The researcher also notes that though the four entrepreneurial leaders interviewed for this study have expanded their businesses, the males have subsidiaries spread across a number of different industries as compared to the females whose subsidiaries are closely related to their core business. The researcher therefore theorises that this may be due to the fact that men have a higher tendency to undertake risky ventures unlike women. Another factor that may cause these differences may result from the experience of the entrepreneur in relation to how long (s)he has been in business. Below are some statements that attest to these facts: “… so around my Mikaddo Holdings which comprise of Pharmacy (and the pharmacy, I have eleven outlets spread all over the country); I have a manufacturing unit in Tema called Mikaddo Laboratories. I’m into estates, commercial estates called Mikaddo Estates. I have a microfinance, called KamaFin. Then, I have a clinic in Kumasi, a conference center in 108 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Koforidua, guest houses in Accra and Kumasi, farm in Kumasi. … I have 16 subsidiaries of my company, so which means that I can easily organize business in any form. If I’m into farming, I’m into pharmaceuticals, I’m into printing, I’m into microfinance…” –MK “We have five different subsidiaries… We have FC Skin and Beauty Clinic…then we have the Beauty College… Salon which has the beauty supplies… FC Perfume and Cosmetics… We have the Grace Amo Obeng Foundation which dedicated to eradicating the menace of sex for money…” –GC Another respondent also proffers that, “I diversified into other things, like the forex bureau (I own up to 8 forex bureaus)… we have Dasco International which is the mother company, ok, and that is also run by… it’s an entity on its own. When I say entity, I mean it’s a registered company on its own. The forex bureaus too are registered businesses on their own. The hotel too, Dasco farms, Seragem Ghana, they are all, you know; but they are all under the umbrella of Dasco Group of companies… When you say sectors, I’ll relate it to the industries. So we are in the hospitality industry, the non-financial industry (i.e. the forex bureaus). For instance, Emajet forex bureau is the 2nd best, if not the best forex bureau in Ghana, according to the books of Bank of Ghana” –DA “We do interior decoration, we are into provision of construction materials and we also do a bit of construction on the side and pretty much we do a bit of purchasing of supply. For instance if we have a contract to supply, we just source it and then we supply.” –AJ 109 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.4.3 Assets and finances Another significant impact entrepreneurial leadership has on SME growth is the improvement of the firm’s assets and finances. Thus, when posed with the question, respondents has this to say: “My accounts show, mmmm, my accounts show, and then the quantity of assets that I’m having- the buildings. Right now, I’m running my pharmacies in my own buildings. I’m not renting, and that’s a sign that there’s growth… The stock level in my warehouses is also a sign that my company is growing.” –MK “I think last year, our [Emajet forex bureau] turnover was about USD45million. I don’t have the exact figures, but I know that we are the best. Every year, Bank of Ghana does the rankings... okay, and then our worth (in terms of properties, we have invested into buildings on the Spintex Road and elsewhere, putting these together, we worth so much)…” –DA Two respondents were not willing to provide the researcher with neither their financial statements over the years nor their current net worth, as expected. In view of that, the researcher asked for an estimated value of their worth but to no avail. When asked whether GC’s company’s net worth could be more than ₵10,000,000.00, this was her reply, “It should be but of course I can’t get you the figures too…” –GC Similarly, AJ did not readily provide the researcher with the financial information, not even a rough estimate. However, after persistent guesses she said, “Let’s just say we are worth GH₵10,000,000.00” though the researcher believes that she will be worth more than that because of the investments she has made into other subsidiaries, company’s buildings, automobiles among others. The researcher also observed that both AJ and GC run their company in their own buildings and automobiles among others. 110 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Interestingly, these two respondents are females, thus the researcher surmises that though businesspeople are expected to withhold financial information, businesswomen are more likely retain financial information more than businessmen. Drawing from the masculinity dimension in Hofstede’s study (2011), this maybe so because men naturally like to brag about their achievements whereas women prefer to “lay low” in other to avoid the envy and jealousy of other people. 5.4.4 Market Share Relating to market share also, two respondents readily provided some figures (though it was guessed) while the other two respondents remained silent on it. The figures were guessed because Ghana is characterized by poor record keeping skills, as in any developing country, hence difficulty in obtaining accurate information. One participant remarked “Erm, in Ghana, it’s very difficult to know the market, for that matter, knowing where you belong. But I can guess, that I have about 15% of the market share.” –MK Another respondent also guessed that “….our market share (about 35-43%)… Comparatively, we are about, let me say about 35%” –DA Again, the women entrepreneurial leaders were not ready to guess their market share, though they admit that they have loyal customers with whom they relate and transact business. This is how they put it: “I cannot give you exact figures about the market share because you know we’re in Ghana and information is very difficult to get. There hasn’t been any reliable data on the kind of market share that we have… We are in a niche market and our products are products are […] you can’t just go to the market and just pick and use just like that. It has to be something that a therapist recommended that use this and that based on your peculiar skin condition, so I cannot 111 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh just give you figure on it… we have distributors who are distributing our products here in Ghana and elsewhere. So I mean if you look at the value chain you’ll realise that the business has grown” –GC “What makes me think my company is growing, is the size our market share… Oooh, I don’t want to hazard a guess but I will say we are not doing too badly. Yes… That I would like to keep…Yes. We are not doing too badly. We have a high profile companies and organization whom we work for. We have loyalty for people who started with us and who continue to show that loyalty to our brand.” -AJ 5.5 Other findings 5.5.1 Supernatural Being supporting growth One interesting finding was the fact that all respondents highlight that though entrepreneurial leaders need traits such as innovativeness, risk-taking propensity, proactiveness, visionary, and ability to motivate, the ‘God-factor’ is also very important. They give credit to a supreme being at one point during the interview. Two respondents give glory to God for how far He has brought them. One respondent believes that anytime he prayed to God when confronted with challenges, by some supernatural power, it gets settled. Another also admit that the strength used in manning the business comes from God. Below are their responses: “…I believe there is an unknown supporter, a hand, who I’ll describe as “God.” He’s always at my beck and call. When I’m in crises, I pray, and that solves my problems...” -MK “I am not afraid of taking risks and I have this strong belief that I can do anything through God who strengthens me.” -GC “…. But I give glory to God anyway. I give glory to God for how far he has brought me. That I’ve been able to make an impact into people’s lives, into my own life, yeah…” -DA 112 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh “In fact, I can only give praise and glory to God because I never thought that I would become like a household name, people will know more about Jandel” -AJ Though not definite, the researcher posits that contextually, religion has some influence on SME growth. This may be as a result of the superstitious nature of Ghanaians and Africans in general. 5.5.2 Gender and SME growth It was revealed by the female respondents that sexism does not affect the growth of their enterprises largely because most women in Ghana (including they) are operating in female dominated industries. One of them however couldn’t hide the fact that sexual harassment is a troubling concern especially in cases where they have to meet men for business deals. “…the challenge comes when you are going to meet men for jobs … but at times things like sexual harassment do happen. It is real. But you will have to stand your ground… As for sexual harassment, it is real no matter how old you are…” – AJ 5.5.3 Government support On the issue of government support and whether or not it helped in the growth of their (the respondents) enterprises, participants revealed that they did not receive any support from government in terms of resources, instead, the government created the enabling environment to enable them run their businesses smoothly though certain policies affected them. Thus, though government may not directly support SMEs, it is important to note that SMEs are affected by their actions and inactions. This is what they have to say: “We always get promises, but we don’t get the support per say.” -MK “Not at all in terms of finance… So I’ve never, in terms of money, government support, no. maybe the environment, you see, government does not give money alone, but also through the 113 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh institutions creates conducive business environments. So, yeah, we’ve enjoyed some of the government policies which has helped us… Contracts, yes but not financial supports…” –DA “Government has supported the growth of my business in that, I have worked with the government a lot. Almost 18years of operating my business, I have worked with the government in various organisations. But the government has not given me any form of funding.” –AJ One of the respondent however confesses that the government offered some financial assistance, yet it was declined as a result of fear. The participant stated, “…It will interest you to know that I’ve not in Ghana here gone for a loan. I started small, rather the first thing was when I was in the UK, the Department of Trade and Industry wanted, at the time as far back as 1986, wanted to give me 100,000 pounds, but I was afraid to take it. Ei, what am I going to do with that money? So I never took it, rather somebody supplied me with goods, and I built small small on it to come this far...” This statement also reveals that there are some government support (in terms of finances) available to SMEs however the entrepreneurs are afraid to go for it. Another respondent also acknowledged the bank for supporting the business financially through loans. She recalls that “…even the bank that I was banking with saw that I was labouring. I could not keep up and they offered a loan. I didn’t blink, I took it, paid back and they gave me more, I paid back.… So I have just built my business on the loans. Because the business was growing and because I had access to funding… Exactly. It is the bank that… The bank for which I am eternally grateful to is the trust bank [now] Ecobank. …the head of small to medium scale businesses. The department who gives credit. They identified my need. At that time, I was struggling, it didn’t occur to me that I could go and get a loan because I didn’t have collateral … Also my mother was a huge support … she went further to give me her only house as collateral to the bank.” 114 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh The researcher postulates that the sole responsibility of supporting SMEs should not lie on the government alone, however other institutions should be play a part in helping SMEs rise above their challenges. As mentioned earlier, the major setback for SMEs in their early stages is finances, but are however unable to access the loans normally due to no collaterals and high interest rates. 5.5.4 Reasons why Ghanaian SMEs hardly grow into large firms Having gone through the stages of growth to achieve this feat, the researcher wanted to know why the entrepreneurial leaders/respondents think SMEs in Ghana are not growing exponentially. Below are their responses: “Oh, I think they lack the knowledge as to how to grow. They don’t know how to grow, because they only copied other people… If you know, if you know what to do, how to expand your business, you must have the knowledge, academic knowledge can also help- business administration, management or entrepreneurship option. It will tell you how to grow your business in terms of management functions, your staffing style, your decision-making, motivation and control of your business. Eeeeeerh… all these you need to know and that will help you expand. Otherwise, you would attempt to expand and you will rather kill your business. So knowledge is power. Knowledge and wisdom is whatever I think is necessary” – MK “It’s a combination of factors… if the business environment is not favourable for business, they will not grow generally. Number two, if the entrepreneurs themselves…the entrepreneurs themselves sometimes they are not committed to their vision… sometimes too they don’t push hard enough, they are not innovative enough, they don’t produce products that are world class. We look at this environment, we don’t look beyond….” –GC 115 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh “…1) Their own ability; 2) maybe the business in which they find themselves, eeerh, there’s no prospect… Sometimes, people find themselves in businesses that have no future. That one there’s nothing you can do, when it gets to the peak, it will fall. And most of us, Ghanaians, find ourselves in that area. We get into businesses that cannot grow. That is also the cause… No, no, no. no matter the support that they get, when they get to its saturated point, (you see saturation eh, no amount that you can add to it will change anything), so when it gets to the saturated point, and again too, we find ourselves doing the same thing all over; because what you are doing, I’m also doing it; and somebody is doing the same thing all over.” –DA “…It is difficult to sustain the business. Most of them don’t have good book keeping and also a lot of SME`s do not trust… an acumen and he also had a passion for what he was doing… If your children have the passion for what you are doing, that’s a good thing. But if they do not have a passion and you do not want your business to die, then you have to put structures in place… If you don’t have that mentality, the business cannot grow and diversification is key. Because if one is going down, another is going up. So you can always rob Peter to pay Paul. ” –AJ From the responses above, it can be inferred that the main reason why SMEs are not growing at an encouraging rate in Ghana, is largely because of the entrepreneur. This is because, although other factors such as the business environment come to play, it is obvious that several Ghanaian entrepreneurs lack either the requisite knowledge, commitment to the vision, acumen, passion, innovative abilities to diversify or improve, ability to see a viable opportunity, or has a myopic outlook to business, hence their inability to grow into large firms. 116 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.6 A Summary of the Cross-Case Analysis in relation to the objectives of the study Themes/Cases MK GC DA AJ EL Dimensions Religion (R) * * * * Visionary (V) * * * * Risk Taking (Rt) * * * * Team Player (Tp) * * Proactiveness (P) * * * * Innovativeness (I) * * * * Ability to Motivate (Am) * * * * Socially responsible (Sr) * * Human Capital Exposure (Ex) * * * * Education (Ed) * * * * Work experience (We) * * * * Challenges Financials (F) * * * * Infrastructure (I) * * * * Human resources (Hr ) * * * * Growth/Result Assets (A) * * * * Employee (E) * * * * Profitability (Py) * * Subsidiaries (S) * * * * Market share (Ms) * * Note (*) means variable of the theme has impact on case. Source: Adapted from Blankson and Crawford (2012) Thus, from Table 5.6, it can be deduced that innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking, visionary, ability to motivate and religion are the dominant qualities of entrepreneurial leadership in the Ghanaian context. Also, human capital is of great essence to all respondents. Challenges such as financial, human resource and infrastructure generally affect all the cases though they operate in different industries. And finally, for an SME to achieve growth, the entrepreneur must exhibit entrepreneurial leadership qualities and possess high quality human capital; which will enable him/her to effectively and efficiently manage challenges. 117 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 5.7 Discussion of Findings This section discusses the findings from the field in relation to existing literature. That is, whether the findings affirm or contradict existing literature. 5.7.1 Understanding Entrepreneurial leadership (Objective 1) Concerning this objective, the research asked questions to elicit views on the respondents’ understanding of entrepreneurial leadership, characteristics of an entrepreneurial leader, and instances that make one an entrepreneurial leader. The results showed that respondents merge their understanding of both entrepreneurship and leadership to explain/define entrepreneurial leadership. This is aligned with Stevenson & Jarrillo-Mossi (1986) and Yukl (2002) who opine that entrepreneurial leadership draws insights from both entrepreneurship and leadership disciplines. Contrary to some literature on entrepreneurial leadership which is inclined toward the leadership discipline (Ireland, Hitt, & Sirmon, 2003; Kuratko, 2007; Gupta, MacMillan & Surie, 2004; Dover, Hariharan, & Cummings, 2014; Yu & Kwan, 2015), the findings in this study reveals that entrepreneurial leadership leans more towards the entrepreneurship discipline. Hence, the debate still goes on as to where exactly entrepreneurial leadership lies. Respondents’ description of an entrepreneurial leader aligns with Chen’s study in 2007 which examines entrepreneurial leadership along the strands of the entrepreneurial orientation constructs i.e. innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking propensity (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996; Covin & Miles, 1999). In addition, the respondents indicated an extension of the entrepreneurial orientation constructs to include visionary and ability to motivate which is in line with Renko et al’s study in 2015. It is also interesting to note that Ghanaian female entrepreneurs perceive an entrepreneurial leader as someone who is a team player and is socially responsible. This finding is consistent with Chen (2007) and Reich (1987) who found 118 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh out that joint entrepreneurship inspires creativity among other team members, such that its impact on growth is greater than the individual contributions combined. From the Ghanaian context, religion is relevant to the entrepreneurial leader as it plays a vital role in the success of the enterprise. This finding aligns with Makhbul and Hasun (2011) who found that the best factor that induces entrepreneurial success is the religious duty factor. Other studies also suggests that good values (i.e., honesty, spiritual, and ethical aspects) stemming from religious backgrounds can create a healthy organisation (Kriger & Hanson, 1999), while the opposite negatively affect people as well as the economic system (Machan, 1999). Parboteeah, Hoegl, & Cullen (2008) also proffer that ethics and moral values are becoming important in the current global market regardless of demographic or cultural factors. Furthermore, respondents generally understood the words that they used to describe an entrepreneurial leader. An interesting find revealed that proactivity did not only mean spotting an opportunity or challenge ahead of time and taking measures to either take advantage of it or deal with it before it actually happens; but it also includes acting promptly to challenges and opportunities as and when they arise. This agrees with Coulthard (2007) who argues that proactiveness is not necessarily always being the first mover in the market. Respondents also believe that they are entrepreneurial leaders because they possess majority (if not all) of the qualities of an entrepreneurial leader and accurately cited instances that make them one. 5.7.2 The role of Human Capital in achieving SME growth (Objective 2) Respondents agree that the human capital of the entrepreneur is pivotal to the growth of SME, although the idea of surrounding oneself with people with high levels of human capital in case the entrepreneur lacks in that area was also relevant. This is because the human capital of an entrepreneur enables him/her to understand things better and accurately apply certain theories 119 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh when undertaking certain business practices, as well as manage challenges in a way that its influence on SMEs will not be grave. This is in tandem with Abbas (2014) who concluded that an entrepreneurial leader needs high levels of quality education, relevant work experience and skills including the persistent desire to succeed as this will help him/her manage the unforeseen challenges in addition to competing effectively and efficiently. The findings also revealed that the respondents’ exposure in terms of their experience outside the country provides them with a competitive advantage over their competitors. Exposure has helped them provide better services (by adapting certain strategies learned in the foreign country), get access to raw materials directly, and also build trust relationship with their foreign suppliers. This aligns with Ruzzier, Antoncic, Hisrich, & Konecnik (2007) who discovered that firms with more internationally experienced entrepreneurs and a bigger international orientation realize international aspirations more readily than do entrepreneurs without these attributes. In view of that, entrepreneurial leaders are able to easily enter into partnerships agreements with individuals or organisations in the foreign country. Findings also discovered that prior working experience impacts on the growth of the enterprise, in that, entrepreneurial leaders who have worked elsewhere before setting up their enterprise acquire and improve on certain skills (such as managerial, technical, networking and negotiation skills) that enable their enterprises to perform better and positively impacts the firms’ growth. 5.7.3 Challenges of entrepreneurial leaders (Objective 3) In achieving this objective, entrepreneurial leaders who participated in the study, listed a number of challenges that affect their businesses. The finding revealed that though all respondents operate in distinct industries, certain challenges such as financial, human resource 120 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh and infrastructure (assets) were common among them. Among these general challenges, the entrepreneurial leader finds the human resource challenge to be the major challenge, although financial challenges will always be there. The finding is similar to what other studies that discovered that entrepreneurial leaders in developing economies are generally inhibited by weak economy, limited access to financial capital, an inability to hire reliable employees, and too much competition (Benzing, Chu, & Callanan, 2005; Chu, Benzing, & McGee, 2007; Pratt, 2001). Also, a number of enlisted challenges were common to all respondents because all of them operate within the same Ghanaian macro environment. These challenges include; taxes, inflation, power fluctuation, lack of affordable capital, exchange rate and/or depreciating currency, political stability, legal issues, social vices (such as armed robbery), fire outbreaks, among others. These findings agree with Kiggundu (2002), Pope (2001), and Stevenson (1998), who found that aside the unfavorable institutional/regulatory environment, there are additional expenses of bribery and corruption. Again, some unique challenges were brought to light. In the Ghanaian pharmaceutical industry, expiry dates is a challenge, because unlike in advanced countries where they adopt the just-in- time stocking, the situation is opposite in Ghana. Thus, businesses operating within the industry stock their warehouses with large volumes of drugs, and the challenge occurs when the drugs are not sold off before the expiry dates. Another peculiar challenge (which is more psychological) in the beauty industry is the concept of bleaching. Being creative and abreast with time is the distinctive challenge of the events and planning industry. The study also found out that Ghanaian entrepreneurial leaders do not overcome challenges, instead, they manage challenges. This is because human beings are very difficult to control thus, when the human 121 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh resource have the wrong attitude, it threatens the firm’s success. Also, challenges are managed because entrepreneurial leaders have very little/no control over the external environment. 5.7.4 Entrepreneurial Leadership and SME growth (Objective 4) Respondents admit that having exhibited entrepreneurial leadership in their firms, they have enjoyed a number of benefits which have amounted to the growth of their SMEs. Some of these benefits include increase in the number of employees, subsidiaries, assets, profitability, and market share which is consistent with what Koryak, Mole, Lockett, Hayton, Ucbasaran and Hodgkinson (2015) noted. They noted that firms deliberately grow along the size, market share, profitability, and asset dimensions. The results also confirm Matzler, Schwarz, Deutinger, & Harms (2008), who indicated that transformational and entrepreneurial leadership has a positive direct impact on innovation, growth and profitability, and that, innovation positively impacts on growth and profitability. They further suggest that entrepreneurial leadership is the appropriate approach for the management of SMEs. Brown, Jones, and Leigh (2005) also discovered that entrepreneurial leadership fosters job opportunities within the economy, and this is evident in the increase in the number of employees since the inception of the firm (Liedholm & Mead, 1999). Tarabishy et al. (2005) also noted that entrepreneurial leadership enables firms to implore strategies that are entrepreneurially oriented and thus, promotes innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking behaviours. This is because research has indicated that firms that use entrepreneurially oriented strategies perform better in dynamic markets than firms that do not adopt such strategies (Tarabishy et al., 2005). They further advise that before a firm makes an initial public offering, the entrepreneurial leader needs to balance innovativeness, proactiveness and risk taking propensities; however, after the initial public offering, the entrepreneur needs to inspire and promote more innovative and proactive activities than risky ones (Tarabishy et al, 2005). 122 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Again, it was revealed that Ghanaian entrepreneurial leaders instill some entrepreneurial values and ethics in their employees. This is evident because, most employees who decide to leave, resign to either set up their own enterprises around the same business idea(s), or manage other organisations, by adopting the same leadership style as the entrepreneurial leader’s. 5.7.5 Gender and SME growth The study found that gender did not play a significant role in SME growth. In most developing countries, especially Sub-Saharan Africa, Ghana, a number of social institutions discriminate (with regards to accessing credit facilities) against women owned enterprises which invariably cause high levels of stunted growth resulting in more women entrepreneurs operating in the informal sectors compared to that of men. Aterido, Beck, and Iacovone (2013) contend that, female entrepreneurs need exceptional (unobservable) capabilities in order to operate in the formal sectors due to the overall discrimination against female entrepreneurs. In contrast, findings of this study revealed that female entrepreneurial leaders are not discriminated against. This is because female entrepreneurial leaders, usually operating in the formal sector, possess certain unique capabilities that enable them receive and access financial credit. As a result, their gender is insignificant to the growth of the firm. This finding agrees with Hansen and Rand (2014a) who concluded that women who are able to break the ‘glass ceiling’ have relatively better capabilities on average, compared to that of the average male entrepreneur. In view of that, female entrepreneurs possessing these remarkable capabilities are more likely to get hold of formal credit facilities. 5.7.6 Government support On the issue of government support, the respondents revealed that they did not receive any support from government in terms of resources, rather, the government created the enabling 123 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh environment to facilitate the smooth running of their businesses, although certain policies affect them. Thus, though government may not directly support SMEs, it is important to note that SMEs are affected by their actions and inactions. In addition, respondents noted that governmental contracts awarded them made a significant contribution to the growth of their enterprises. This finding is however inconsistent with Benzing, Chu, & Kara, (2009) who realized that Turkish entrepreneurs regard government support and political involvement as relatively insignificant to their firm growth. 5.7.7 Factors affecting SME growth It was also brought to light that the entrepreneur is the prime reason why SMEs in Ghana do not grow, though are a number of factors that also affect the growth of many SMEs in Ghana. This is largely true because several Ghanaian entrepreneurs lack either the requisite knowledge, commitment to the vision, acumen, passion, innovative abilities to diversify or improve, ability to see a viable opportunity, or has a myopic outlook to business, hence a large number of imitators in the sector, resulting in their inability to grow into large firms. This aligns with Stefanovic, Prokic, & Rankovic (2010) who found out that Serbian entrepreneurs lack of motives concerned with sustainable development of enterprise in a long run. 124 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER SIX SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.0 Introduction This final chapter presents a summary of the study and its major findings, conclusions, and significance of the study. Based on the conclusions drawn from the findings of this research, recommendations, as well as limitations and suggestions for future research are presented. 6.1 Summary of the study Globally, entrepreneurship and the development of SMEs have contributed immensely to the economic development of countries (both developed and developing) all over the world (Abor & Quartey. 2010; Calza & Goedhuys, 2016). Contextually, the most dominant form of business is found in the SME sector, representing 92% of all businesses and contributing about 70% to Ghana’s Gross Domestic Product (Abor & Quartey, 2010). In spite of their contributions, they are faced with a number of challenges, which will not be problematic if entrepreneurs possess certain human capital, and also lead with an entrepreneurial eye. Thus, the research aimed to investigate the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and SME growth in Ghana by drawing some lessons from transformational leaders in the country. Extant literature was reviewed in relation to some thematic areas such as entrepreneurship, leadership, entrepreneurial leadership and its definition, dimensions of entrepreneurial leadership, challenges of entrepreneurial leadership, its effects, and the human capital theory. In addition, a brief discussion on the SME sector in Ghana; and an overview of the companies used in this research was also presented. A qualitative design was adopted for this study, and gathered data from four Ghanaian transformational entrepreneurs through face to face in-depth interviews. These discussions and 125 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh interviews were recorded and transcribed and the data acquired were later analysed thematically. The findings of this study were presented and the discussions were made in light of extant literature and the objectives of the study. 6.2 Summary of Major findings 6.2.1 Understanding entrepreneurial leadership (Objective 1) Objective 1 was to investigate how Ghanaian transformational entrepreneurs understood the concept of entrepreneurial leadership. The findings suggested that Ghanaian transformational entrepreneurs understood the concept by merging their understanding from both entrepreneurship and leadership disciplines. This is similar to that of Stevenson & Jarrillo- Mossi (1986) and Yukl (2002) assertion. In relation to the five dimensions of entrepreneurial leadership, the findings indicated that respondents generally view innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking, visionary, and ability to motivate as the essential qualities of an entrepreneurial leader. Notwithstanding other variables such as team player, socially responsible and religion are other qualities of entrepreneurial leader. 6.2.2 The role of Human Capital (Objective 2) Concerning the second objective which sought to examine the role of human capital in achieving SME growth, all respondents agree that human capital is pivotal in the growth of their enterprises. Though, prior working experience and exposure of the entrepreneur provide some competitive advantage to the company, respondents rated education as the most important human capital. This is because education enables them to understand the firms’ financial books, communicate better and broadens their perspective on issues. Also education has made them aware of the various leadership styles of which all of them adopt the democratic/participatory style of leadership which has also influenced their growth considerably. Respondents believe that their company has grown to its current state as a result of their leadership style. 126 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 6.2.3 Challenges of entrepreneurial leadership (Objective 3) The third objective was to identify the challenge(s) faced by entrepreneurial leaders in achieving SME growth. This objective was assessed using the respondents’ experiences that has been gathered overtime. The findings point out that although the respondents operate in distinct industries some challenges are common to all. These include, financial challenges, human resource challenges and infrastructural challenges. Also, concerning the challenges, respondents generally agree that, before they started the business, finances was the major challenge, however after achieving some level of growth, the major challenge that they are currently battling with is the human resource challenge (i.e. poaching and lack of technical skills). Thus, the findings showed that human resource is the major challenge that affect entrepreneurial leaders. Concerning strategies to combat these challenges, it was revealed that entrepreneurial leaders cannot do away with challenges, largely because of the macro environment within which they operate. At best, they only manage it. 6.2.4 The effects of entrepreneurial leadership (Objective 4) The final objective regarding the effects entrepreneurial leadership has on SME growth was assessed using respondents’ description of their growth pattern. Respondents indicated that because they possess entrepreneurial leadership qualities and quality human capital, they are able to effectively and efficiently manage the challenges that confront them, in order to accrue benefits; which include increase in profitability, number of employees, assets, subsidiaries and market share. This finding aligns with that of Koryak et al (2015). 6.2.5 Other notable finding Another notable finding the data revealed was the fact that sexism did not affect the growth of women owned enterprises. The female respondents agree that their gender did not negatively affect the growth of their enterprises, largely because they operate in female dominated 127 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh industries. However, sexual harassment is a concern especially when they have to meet men for business deals. Also, majority of Ghanaian businesses do not grow mainly because, the entrepreneurs lack either the requisite knowledge, commitment to the vision, acumen, passion, innovative abilities to diversify or improve, ability to see a viable opportunity, or has a myopic outlook to business, hence their inability to grow into large firms. 6.3 Conclusions Based on the findings of this study, the following conclusions were drawn:  Entrepreneurial leadership coupled with quality human capital and effective and efficient handling of challenges will result in SME growth.  Human capital (especially Education) is pivotal to SME growth.  The focus on challenges facing entrepreneurial leaders has shifted from financial challenge to the human resource challenge.  In the Ghanaian context, religion and spirituality influences SME growth. 6.4 Recommendations Drawing from the conclusions above, the study makes some recommendations to Ghanaian entrepreneurs and policy makers.  The study noted that entrepreneurial leaders adopt the democratic style of leadership and that has contributed to the growth of their enterprises. Thus, Ghanaian entrepreneurs who are not using the democratic style of leadership should adopt it in order to enjoy the benefits that associated with it.  Also, Ghanaian entrepreneurs should invest more in their human capital (especially education) as it will help accelerate the growth process of SMEs. In addition, it was 128 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh revealed that even if the entrepreneur him/herself is not well educated, (s)he can employ well educated people to man the firm, and while they are it at, the entrepreneur will learn and give direction.  Ghanaian entrepreneurs should avoid copying other people’s business ideas and rather spot a viable opportunity. They should also remain committed to the vision and have a foresight of the firm and a plan to achieve higher heights. Although the challenges, may arise, they must fuel their innovativeness to manage and curb those problems.  Last but not least, policy makers, related governmental institutions as well as various stakeholders must work together to create effective policies that will encourage education and training of entrepreneurs, especially those with low levels of education, on a sustainable basis. 6.5 Limitations and Suggestions for future research To begin with, the study employed a small and homogenous sample. So, the results may not apply to all entrepreneurial leaders in the country. The study suggests that future researchers can consider a larger and varied sample to include young entrepreneurial leaders and entrepreneurial leaders operating within the informal sector. A comparative study can also be conducted to understand the distinctions among various entrepreneurial leaders in different age brackets or different sectors. Furthermore, the research was undertaker in a single geographic region i.e. Greater Accra Region, and the conclusions drawn from the study may not apply to other entrepreneurial leaders residing in other regions of the country. Future research can therefore look at studying other entrepreneurial leaders in the Ashanti or Western Region of Ghana. 129 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Also, the respondents operated in four different sectors, thus, future studies can conduct similar research in a single industry across the country in order to better understand the concept within that industry. Also a comparative study can be conducted between the male entrepreneurial leaders and the female entrepreneurial leaders within that particular industry. Finally, future studies can consider using a quantitative approach to test the various dimensions of entrepreneurial leadership in Ghana. A quantitative research will provide a more accurate generalisation of the findings. 130 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh REFERENCES Ab Rahman, N. A., & Ramli, A. (2014). Entrepreneurship management, competitive advantage and firm performances in the craft industry: concepts and framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145, 129-137. Abbas, M. K. (2014). The challenges of entrepreneurial leadership in Nigeria. Journal of Leadership and Management Studies, 1(1), 52-59. Abdul Razak, M. N. (2010). Keynote address by the Honorary Prime Minister at Invest Malaysia 2010, Kuala Lumpur. Abor, J. & Biekpe, N. (2005). Corporate Debt Policy of Small and Medium Enterprises in Ghana. South Africa: University of Stellenbosch. Abor, J. & Biekpe, N. (2007). Corporate governance, ownership structure and performance of SMEs in Ghana: implications for financing opportunities. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(3), 288-300. Abor, J. & Quartey, P. (2010). Issues in SME development in Ghana and South Africa. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 39(6), 215-228. Abor, J., & Quartey, P. (2010). Issues in SME development in Ghana and South Africa. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 39(6), 215-228. Ackah, J., & Vuvor, S. (2011). The Challenges faced by Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Obtaining Credit in Ghana. Retrieved from http://www.diva- portal.org/smash/get/diva2:829684/FULLTEXT01.pdf (Accessed on 13/04/2017) Adams, G. R. & Schvaneveldt, J. D. (1991). Understanding Research Methods. (2nd Ed). Longman, London. Alembummah, A. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial Orientation and SME Growth: A Study of the Food Processing Sector of Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghana). Ali, H., & Birley, S. (1999). Integrating deductive and inductive approaches in a study of new ventures and customer perceived risk. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 2(2), 103-110. Anane, G. K., Cobbinah, P. B., & Manu, J. K. (2013). Sustainability of small and medium scale enterprises in rural Ghana: The role of microfinance institutions. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(8), 1003. Andrews, F. M., & Farris, G. F. (1967). Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams. Personnel Psychology, 20(4), 497-515. 131 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Anheier, H. K., & Seibel, H. D. (1987). Small-scale industries and economic development in Ghana: Business behavior and strategies in informal sector economies. Verlag Breitenbech, Saarbruckh, Germany. Arham, A. F., Boucher, C., & Muenjohn, N. (2013). Leadership and entrepreneurial success: A study of SMEs in Malaysia. World, 3(5). Aryeetey, E. & Ahene, A. A. (2004). Changing regulatory environment for small-medium size enterprises and their performance in Ghana. In CRC 3rd International Conference on Pro-poor Regulation and Competition: Issues, Policies and Practices, Cape Town, South Africa, September. Aryeetey, E., & Ahene, A. A. (2005). Changing regulatory environment for small-medium size enterprises and their performance in Ghana. Manchester: Centre on Regulation and Competition (Working Paper Series) Aimée Hampel-Milagrosa. Aryeetey, E. (2001). Priority Research Issues Relating to Regulation and Competition in Ghana. Centre on Regulation and Competition Working Paper Series, University of Manchester, Manchester. Aryeetey, E., Baah-Nuakoh, A., Duggleby, T., Hettige, H. & Steel, W. F. (1994). Supply and Demand for Finance of Small Scale Enterprises in Ghana, Discussion Paper No. 251, World Bank, Washington, DC. Aterido, R., Beck, T., & Iacovone, L. (2013). Access to finance in sub-Saharan Africa: Is there a gender gap? World Development, 47, 102–120. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6p1), 359. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1995). An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance a contingency approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(4), 275-293. Aulet, B. & Murray, F. (2012). Not All Jobs Are Created Equal. The Boston Globe. Aulet, W. & Murray, F. (2013). A Tale of Two Entrepreneurs: Understanding differences in the Types of Entrepreneurship in the Economy. Ewin Marion Kaufmann Foundation. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). Mind Garden. Ayyagari, M., Beck, T. & Demirguc-Kunt A. (2003). Small and Medium Size Enterprises across the Globe: A New Database. World Bank, Mimeo. Babbie, E. R. (1990). Survey research methods. Cengage Learning. 132 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Baird, I. S., & Thomas, H. (1985). Toward a contingency model of strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 230-243. Baker, S. E., Edwards, R., & Doidge, M. (2012). How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. Available at http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/11632/1/how_many_interviews.pdf (Accessed on 4/05/2017) Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2009). The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4), 443-464. Banutu-Gomez, M. B., & Banutu-Gomez, S. M. (2007). Leadership and organizational change in a competitive environment. Business Renaissance Quarterly, 2(2), 69. Barnett, V. (1991). Sample survey: Principles and Methods. London: Edward Arnold. Barrow, J. C. (1977). The variables of leadership: A review and conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 231-251. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan. Bass, B., & Bass, R. (2008). The bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th Ed.). New York: The Free Press. Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The review of Economics and Statistics, 551-559. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Beaver, G. (2003). Small business: Success and failure. Strategic Change, 12(3), 115-122. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital theory. Columbia, New York. Becker, G. S. (1975). Front matter, human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. In Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, Second Edition (pp. 22-0). NBER. Begley, T. M., & Boyd, D. P. (1987b). Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(1), 79-93. Benzing, C., Chu, H. M., & Callanan, G. (2005). A regional comparison of the motivation and problems of Vietnamese entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 10(01), 3-27. 133 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Benzing, C., Chu, H. M., & Kara, O. (2009). Entrepreneurs in Turkey: A factor analysis of motivations, success factors, and problems. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(1), 58-91. Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. (2. Ed). Tampa, FL, USA. Bird, B. (1989). Entrepreneurial Behavior, Scott, Foresman & Company, Glenview, IL. BIS, Scottish Enterprise, Invest NI & Welsh Government (2012). Business growth ambitions amongst SMEs, BIS, London. Blaikie, N. W. H. (2000). Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA. Blankson, C., & Crawford, J. C. (2012). Impact of positioning strategies on service firm performance. Journal of Business research, 65(3), 311-316. Bleeker, I. (2011). The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on the innovation process: an empirical research on manufacturing SMEs (Master's thesis, University of Twente). Boateng, R. (2014). Research Made Easy. Accra: Pearl Richards Foundation. Boohene, R., Marfo-Yiadom, E., & Yeboah, M. A. (2012). An empirical analysis of the effect of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance of auto artisans in the Cape Coast Metropolis. Developing Country Studies, 2(9), 77-86. Bosma, N., Van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & De Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23(3), 227-236. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509-520. Brown, S. P., Jones, E., & Leigh, T. W. (2005). The attenuating effect of role overload on relationships linking self-efficacy and goal level to work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 972. Brown, R., & Lee, N. (2014). Funding issues confronting high growth SMEs in the UK. ICAS, Edinburgh. Brüderl, J., Preisendörfer, P., & Ziegler, R. (1992). Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review, 227-242. Bryman, A. (1993). Quality and Quality in Social Research. Routledge. London 134 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Buame, S. (2012). Entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial education, venture creation, and SME management in Ghana. Accra: Big Mike’s Publications. Buame, S. K. (1996). Entrepreneurship: a contextual perspective. Discourses and praxis of entrepreneurial activities within the institutional context of Ghana (Vol. 28). Lund University Press. Burns, A. C., & Bush, R. F. (2000). Marketing research. Globalization, 1(7). Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership, 1978. New Yorker: Harper & Row. Bygrave, W. D., & Hofer, C. W. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13-22. Calza, E., & Goedhuys, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial heterogeneity and the design of entrepreneurship policies for economic growth and inclusive development (No. 043). United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT). Camerer, C., & Lovallo, D. (1999). Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 306-318. Cantillon, R. (1734). Essay on the Nature of General Commerce. Henry Higgs, Trans. London: Macmllan. Castanias, R. P., & Helfat, C. E. (1992). Managerial and windfall rents in the market for corporate control. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(2), 153-184. Chan, S. H. (2010). The influence of leadership expertise and experience on organizational performance: a study of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(1- 2), 59-77. Chen, M. H. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership and new ventures: Creativity in entrepreneurial teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 239-249. Chowdhury, M. F. (2014). Interpretivism in aiding our understanding of the contemporary social world. Open Journal of Philosophy, 2014. Chu, H. M., Benzing, C., & McGee, C. (2007). Ghanaian and Kenyan entrepreneurs: A comparative analysis of their motivations, success characteristics and problems. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12(03), 295-322. Chung-Wen, Y. (2008). The relationships among leadership styles, entrepreneurial orientation, and business performance. Managing Global Transitions, 6(3), 257. Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2003). Business research: A practical guide for postgraduate and undergraduate students. (2nd Ed), Basingstoke, Macmillan Business. 135 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Cook, P., & Nixson, F. (2000). Finance and small and medium-sized enterprise development. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester. Cooper, A. C. (1973). Technical entrepreneurship: what do we know? R&D Management, 3(2), 59-64. Coulthard, M. (2007). The role of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance and the potential influence of relational dynamism. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 3(1), 29. Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47-47. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 3, 5- 28. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. US: Sage publications Ltd. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative procedures. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 173-202. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. Cuckovic, N., & Bartlett, W. (2007). Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness: The Europeanisation of Small and Medium‐ sized Enterprise Policy in Croatia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 7(1), 37-56. Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45. Cyert, R. (2006). Defining leadership and explicating the process. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1(1), 29–38. Cyril Eze, U., Guan Gan Goh, G., Yih Goh, C., & Ling Tan, T. (2013). Perspectives of SMEs on knowledge sharing. Vine, 43(2), 210-236. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-331. Davies, J., Hides, M., & Powell, J. (2002). Defining the development needs of entrepreneurs in SMEs. Education+ Training, 44(8/9), 406-412. Day, G. S. (2007). Closing the growth gap: balancing BIG I and small i Innovation. Market Science Institute Reports, (06-121). 136 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. The Journal of Marketing, 1-20. Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 3-24. De la Torre, A., Pería, M. S. M., & Schmukler, S. L. (2010). Bank involvement with SMEs: Beyond relationship lending. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(9), 2280-2293. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigms and perspectives in contention. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 183-190. Dess, G. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 147-156. Dover, P. A., Hariharan, S., & Cummings, M. G. (2014). Leadership and Governance. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Management, ICMLG 2014, Academic Conferences Limited. Downs Jr, G. W., & Mohr, L. B. (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 700-714. Drucker, P. (1970). Entrepreneurship in business enterprise. Journal of Business Policy, 1(1), 3-12. Easterby-Smith, M. T., & Thorpe, R. (2002). R. & Lowe, A. (2002). Management research: An Introduction, 2, 342. Easterby‐ Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Tsang, E. W. (2008). Inter‐ organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677-690. Eggers, J. H., & Leahy, K. T. (1995). Entrepreneurial leadership. Business Quarterly, 59, 71- 71. Eldabi, T., Irani, Z., Paul, R. J., & Love, P. E. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative decision- making methods in simulation modelling. Management Decision, 40(1), 64-73. Elster, J. (2007). Explaining Social Behaviour: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ensley, M. D., Pearce, C. L., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2006). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between entrepreneur leadership behavior and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 243-263. 137 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Ettlie, J. E. & Rubenstein, A. H. (1987). Firm size and product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(2), 89-108. European Commission. (2010). What is an SME? https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/business- friendly-environment/sme-definition_en (Accessed on 08/11/2017). Eyal, O., & Kark, R. (2004). How do transformational leaders transform organizations? A study of the relationship between leadership and entrepreneurship. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 211-235. Feldman, M. P. (2014). The character of innovative places: entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 9-20. Fernald Jr, L. W., Solomon, G. T., & Tarabishy, A. (2005). A new paradigm: Entrepreneurial leadership. Southern Business Review, 30(2), 1. Fiedler, F. E. (1996). Research on leadership selection and training: One view of the future. Administrative Science Quarterly, 241-250. Frederick, S., Bair, J., & Gereffi, G. (2015). Regional trade agreements and export competitiveness: the uncertain path of Nicaragua’s apparel exports under CAFTA. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, rsv015. Freel, M. S. (2000). Barriers to product innovation in small manufacturing firms. International Small Business Journal, 18(2), 60-80. Frese, M., & de Kruif, M. (2000). Psychological success factors of entrepreneurship in Africa: a selective literature review. Success and Failure of Microbusiness Owners in Africa: A Psychological Approach, London: Quorum Books. Frimpong, C. Y. (2013). Strengthening SMEs in Ghana. Retrieved from www.reflexecogroup.com/news/1209-strengthening-smes-in-ghana/ Accessed on 14/08/2016. Gamberoni, E., Heath, R., & Nix, E. (2013). Subsistence, Transformational and Something in Between. A Roadmap for Promoting Women’s Economic Empowerment. Available at: www.womeneconroadmap.org. Ganu, J., & Boateng, P. A. (2012). Harnessing the Potentials of Informal Sector Women for Development in Ghana. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 8(2), 46. Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110-132. Garfield, C. (1986). Peak Performers: The New Heroes of American Business. New York: Avon Books. 138 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Garland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R. & Garand, J.C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: a conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354‐ 9. Gasse, Y. (1982). Elaborations on the psychology of the entrepreneur. Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, 57-71. Ghauri, P. N., & Grønhaug, K. (2005). Research methods in business studies: A practical guide. Pearson Education. Ghosh, B. C., Liang, T. W., Meng, T. T. & Chan, B. (2001). The key success factors, distinctive capabilities, and strategic thrusts of top SMEs in Singapore. Journal of Business Research, 51(3), pp. 209-221. Gill, J., & Johnson, P. (2010). Research methods for managers. Sage. Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 750-783. Goodwin, C., Mayo, M. & Hill, R. P. (1997). Sales-person response to loss of a major account: a qualitative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 40, 167-80. Goossen, R. J., & Stevens, R. P. (2013). Entrepreneurial leadership: Finding your calling, making a difference. InterVarsity Press. Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. Sage. Greenberger, D. B., & Sexton, D. L. (1988). An interactive model of new venture initiation. Journal of Small Business Management, 26(3), 1-7. Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Sage Publications. Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative Methods in Management Research. (2nd Ed), London: Sage Publications, Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 241-260. Guy, R. F., Edgley, C. E., Arafat, I. & Allen, D. E. (1987). Social Research Methods: Puzzles and Solutions. Massachusetts, Allyn & Bacon. Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451-465. Hage J. 1980. Theories of organizations. New York: Wiley. Hair, J. F., Wolfinbarger, M. F., Ortinau, D. J., & Bush, R. P. (2008). Essentials of Marketing Research. McGraw-Hill/Higher Education. 139 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Hall, C. (1995). APEC and SME Policy: Suggestions for an action agenda. Monash Asia Institute. Hansemark, O. C. (1998). The effects of an entrepreneurship program on need for achievement and locus of control of reinforcement. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 4(1), 28-50. Hansen, H., & Rand, J. (2014a). The myth of female credit discrimination in African manufacturing. Journal of Development Studies, 50(1), 81-96. Harris, M. (1968). Emics, etics, and the new ethnography. The rise of anthropological theory: A history of theories of culture, 568-604. Harris, M. L., & Gibson, S. G. (2006). Determining the common problems of early growth small businesses in Eastern North Carolina. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 71(2), 39. Hayford, S. (2010). The Development of Small Medium Enterprises and their impact to the Ghanaian Economy (Unpublished master's thesis). Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Hayton, J. C. (2003). Strategic human capital management in SMEs: An empirical study of entrepreneurial performance. Human Resource Management, 42(4), 375-391. Hayton, J. (2015), Leadership and Management Skills in SMEs: Measuring Associations with Management Practices and Performance, Enterprise Research Centre, London. Heath, C., & Tversky, A. (1991). Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4(1), 5-28. Hernez-Broome, G., & Hughes, R. L. (2004). Leadership development: Past, present, and future. People and Strategy, 27(1), 24. Hitt, M.A., Black, S. & Porter, L. (2005). Management. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1), 8. Holloway, I., & Todres, L. (2003). The status of method: flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 345-357. http://www.eservices.gov.gh/Pages/Empowering-SMEs-in-Ghana-for-Global- Competitiveness.aspx (Accessed on 03/10/2016) http://www.moti.gov.gh/about-the-ministry-of-trade-and-industry-moti (Accessed on 07/04/2017) http://www.gipcghana.com/about-gc-100/ranking-criteria.html (Accessed on 07/05/2017) 140 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh http://www.gipcghana.com/89-ghana-club-100/sector-leaders/353-kama-health-services.html (Accessed on 07/04/2017) http://www.jandellimited.com/index.php/jandel (Accessed on 14/04/2017) http://www.daascogroup.com/about.html (Accessed on 13/06/2017) http://www.gipcghana.com/about.html (Accessed on 07/05/2017) Hughes, J. (1986). The vital few: The entrepreneur and American economic progress (Vol. 819). Oxford University Press on Demand. Hung, D. K. M., Effendi, A. A., Talib, L. S. A., & Rani, N. A. B. A. (2010). A preliminary study of top SMEs in Malaysia: Key success factor vs government support program. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 6(1), 111. Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651-661. Hurst, E., & Pugsley, B. W. (2011). What do small businesses do? (No. w17041). National Bureau of Economic Research. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis: Principles, practice and applications. Cambridge, England: Polity. Imeokparia, P. O., & Ediagbonya, K. (2014). Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs): A Catalyst in Promoting Economic Development in Nigeria. Small, 5(33). Ireland, R. D. & Webb, J. W. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Business Horizons, 50(1), 49-59. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963-989. ISSER Annual Report. (2015). The State of the Ghanaian economy. Retrieved from http://isser.edu.gh/images/Publication_files/ISSER%20ANNUAL%20REPORT%2020 15-2016.pdf (Accessed on 07/11/2017). IWS (2016). Internet Penetration Ghana. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/af/gh.html (Accessed on 20/06/2017). Iwuoha, J.-P. (2013). Forever Clair – The business that fights skin bleaching by preserving the African natural skin. Available at http://www.smallstarter.com/get-inspired/forever- clair-grace-amey-obeng/ (Accessed on 12/04/2017). Jaiswal, N. K. & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity: A multilevel study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 30-41. 141 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Jogulu, U. D. (2010). Culturally-linked leadership styles. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(8), 705-719. Johnson, D. (2001). What is innovation and entrepreneurship? Lessons for larger organisations. Industrial and Commercial Training, 33(4), 135-140. Jordan, J., Lowe, J., & Taylor, P. (1998). Strategy and financial policy in UK small firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 25(1‐ 2), 1-27. Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 525-544. Kajornboon, A. B. (2005). Using interviews as research instruments. E-journal for Research Teachers, 2(1), 1-9. Karadag, H. (2015). The Role and Challenges of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (Smes) in Emerging Economies: An Analysis from Turkey. Business and Management Studies, 1(2), 179-188. Kassim, Z. A., & Sulaiman, M. (2011). Market orientation and leadership styles of managers in Malaysia. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(2), 230-245. Kayanula, D., & Quartey, P. (2000). The policy environment for promoting small and medium- sized enterprises in Ghana and Malawi. Finance and Development Research Programme, Working Paper Series, Paper No 15, IDPM, University of Manchester. Keh, H. T., Nguyen, T. T. M., & Ng, H. P. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 592-611. Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18(3), 489-501. Kelliher, F. (2005). In Search of Legitimisation: Designing an Interpretive Case Study. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Research Methods: In Business and Management Studies (p. 235). Kheni, N. A., Dainty, A. R., & Gibb, A. G. (2007, September). Influence of political and socio- cultural environments on health and safety management within SMEs: a Ghana case study. In Procs 23rd Annual ARCOM Conference (pp. 3-5). Kiggundu, M. N. (2002). Entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship in Africa: What is known and what needs to be done. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 239. Kim, Y. (2011). SMEs in Africa: Challenges and the role of Government for the future. 142 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Kimberly, J. R. (1981). Managerial innovation. Handbook of Organizational Design, 1(84), 104. King, K., & McGrath, S. (2002). Globalisation, enterprise and knowledge: Education, training and development in Africa. Symposium Books Ltd. Kleinschmidt, E. J., & Cooper, R. G. (1991). The impact of product innovativeness on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8(4), 240-251. Knight, G. (2000). Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 12-32. Kornhauser, A., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). The analysis of consumer actions. The language of social research, 392-404. Koryak, O., Mole, K. F., Lockett, A., Hayton, J. C., Ucbasaran, D., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2015). Entrepreneurial leadership, capabilities and firm growth. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 89-105. Kotler, P. & Keller, L. (2006). Marketing Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kotter, J. P. (2001). What leaders really do (pp. 85-96)? Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. Kriger, M. P., & Hanson, B. J. (1999). A value-based paradigm for creating truly healthy organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(4), 302-317. Kropp, F., & Zolin, R. (2005). Technological entrepreneurship and small business innovation research programs. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2005, 1. Kuada, J. E. (2015). Thesis without Tears. London, U.K. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Kuratko, D. F. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century: Guest editor's perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 1-11. Kuratko, D. F., Goldsby, M. G. & Hornsby, J. S. (2004).The Ethical Perspectives of Entrepreneurs: An Examination of Stakeholder Salience. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 9(4), 19-42. Kuratko, D., & Hodgetts, R. (2001). Entrepreneurship approach. Delmer Publisher, New York. Kwaning, C. O., Nyantakyi, K., & Kyereh, B. (2015). The challenges behind smes’ access to debts financing in the Ghanaian financial market. International, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship Research, 3(2), 16-30. Leedy, P. & Ormrod, J. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design. (7th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. 143 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Levy, B. (1993). Obstacles to developing indigenous small and medium enterprises: an empirical assessment. The World Bank Economic Review, 7(1), 65-83. Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Tan, J., & Liu, Y. (2008). Moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on market orientation‐ performance linkage: Evidence from Chinese small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1), 113-133. Liedholm, C. & Mead, D. C. (1987). Small scale industries in developing countries: Empirical evidence and policy implications (No. 54062). Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics. Liedholm, C. & Mead, D.C. (1999). Small Enterprises and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Micro and Small Enterprises. London: Routledge. Liles, P. R. (1974). Who are entrepreneurs? MSU Business Topics, 22(1), 5-14. Lin, A. C. (1998). Bridging positivist and interpretivist approaches to qualitative methods. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 162-180. Ling, Y. A. N., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Veiga, J. F. (2008). Transformational leadership's role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: Examining the CEO-TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 557-576. Lingard, L., Albert, M., & Levinson, W. (2008). Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ, 337(aug07_3), a567-a567. Locke, E. (2000). Motivation, cognition, and action: An analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 408-429. Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28-48. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451. López, G. J. & Aybar, A. C. (2000). An Empirical Approach to the Financial Behaviour of Small and Medium Sized Companies. Small Business Economics, 14(1), 55-63. Machan, T. R. (1999). Entrepreneurship and ethics. International Journal of Social Economics, 26(5), 596 – 608. Macko, A., & Tyszka, T. (2009). Entrepreneurship and risk taking. Applied Psychology, 58(3), 469-487. 144 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Mahmoud, M. A. (2010). Market orientation and business performance among SMEs in Ghana. International Business Research, 4(1), 241. Maidique, M. A., & Patch, P. (1982). Corporate strategy and technological policy. Readings in the Management of Innovation, 273, 285. Makhbul, Z. M., & Hasun, F. M. (2011). Entrepreneurial success: an exploratory study among entrepreneurs. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 116. Malhotra, N. K. (2007). Marketing research: An applied orientation. (5th Ed). UK: Pearson Prentice Hall. Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2007). Marketing research: An applied approach. Pearson Education. Malhotra, N., & Birks, D. (2006). Marketing Research: An Applied Perspective. Pearson Education. Mahmoud, M. A. (2010). Market orientation and business performance among SMEs in Ghana. International Business Research, 4(1), 241. Mangan, J., Lalwani, C., & Gardner, B. (2004). Combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies in logistics research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(7), 565-578. Manu, G. (1998). Enterprise development in Africa–strategies for impact and growth. Small Enterprise Development, 9(4), 4-13. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-526. Matzler, K., Schwarz, E., Deutinger, N., & Harms, R. (2008). The relationship between transformational leadership, product innovation and performancein SMEs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 21(2), 139-151. McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2016). Smart specialisation, entrepreneurship and SMEs: issues and challenges for a results-oriented EU regional policy. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 537-552. McGivern, Y. (2006). The practice of market and social research: an introduction. London: Pearson Education. McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 284). Harvard Business Press. McKeown, M. (2008). The truth about innovation. Pearson Education India. 145 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 34(1), 63-73. Mensah, S. (2004). A review of SME financing schemes in Ghana. In UNIDO regional workshop of financing small and medium scale enterprises, Accra, Ghana (pp. 15-16). Meyer, H. H., Walker, W. B., & Litwin, G. H. (1961). Motive patterns and risk preferences associated with entrepreneurship. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 570. Meyers, P. W. & Tucker, F. G. (1989). Defining roles for logistics during routine and radical technological innovation. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 17(1), 73–82. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications, Incorporated. Miller, D. & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1-25. Mohd Sam, M. F., Tahir, M. N. H. & Abu Bakar, K. (2012). Owner-manager of SMEs in IT sector: Leadership and company performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(14), 195-205. Mokhber, M., Tan, G. G., Vakilbashi, A., Zamil, N. A. M., & Basiruddin, R. (2016). Impact of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Organization Demand for Innovation: Moderating Role of Employees' Innovative Self-Efficacy. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(3). Morris, T., & Wood, S. (1991). Testing the survey method: continuity and change in British industrial relations. Work, Employment and Society, 5(2), 259-282. Nambisan, S. & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in Innovation Ecosystems: Entrepreneurs' Self-Regulatory Processes and Their Implications for New Venture Success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071-1097. National Knowledge Commission (2008), Entrepreneurship. Government of India, New Delhi. Nooteboom, B. (1994). Innovation and diffusion in small firms: theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6(5), 327-347. Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and Practice. (4th Ed.), Sage Publications, London. 146 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Obeng, B. A., Robson, P., & Haugh, H. (2014). Strategic entrepreneurship and small firm growth in Ghana. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 501-524. O'Connor, G. C. (1998). Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 151-166. OECD. (1991). The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system. Technology and productivity-the challenge for economic policy. Paris: p. 303–14. OECD. (1997). Globalisation and Small and Medium Enterprises, Synthesis Report, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Ogbonna, E., & Harris, L. C. (2000). Leadership style, organizational culture and performance: empirical evidence from UK companies. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4), 766-788. Oke, A., Burke, G., & Myers, A. (2007). Innovation types and performance in growing UK SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 735-753. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634. Oppong, M., Owiredu, A., & Churchill, R. Q. (2014). Micro and small scale enterprises development in Ghana. European Journal of Accounting Auditing and Financial Research, 2(6), 84-97. Osei, B., Baah-Nuakoh, A., Tutu, K. A., & Sowa, N. K. (1993). Impact of structural adjustment on small-scale enterprises in Ghana. Small Enterprises and Changing Policies: Structural Adjustment, Financial Policy and Assistance Programmes in Africa, IT Publications, London. Otani, K. (1996). A human capital approach to entrepreneurial capacity. Economica, 273-289. Owusu‐ Frimpong, N., & Mmieh, F. (2007). An evaluation of the perceptions and marketing practices of nontraditional exporters in Ghana. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(1), 57-76. Papalexandris, N., & Galanaki, E. (2009). Leadership's impact on employee engagement: Differences among entrepreneurs and professional CEOs. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(4), 365-385. Parboteeah, K. P., Hoegl, M., & Cullen, J. B. (2008). Ethics and religion: An empirical test of a multidimensional model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 387-398. Parker, R. L., Riopelle, R., Steel, W. F., & Mundial, B. (1995). Small enterprises adjusting to liberalization in five African countries (Vol. 271). Washington, DC: World bank. 147 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377-393. Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of business ethics, 113(3), 377-393. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications, Inc. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3, 344-347. Patzer, G. L. (1995). Using secondary data in marketing research: United States and worldwide. Greenwood Publishing Group. Paul, S., Whittam, G., & Wyper, J. (2007). The pecking order hypothesis: does it apply to start- up firms? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(1), 8-21. Peprah, J. A., Mensah, A. O., & Akosah, N. B. (2016). Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Accessibility to Public Procurement: SMEs Entity Perspective in Ghana. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 4(11), 25-40. Perry, S. C. (2001). The relationship between written business plans and the failure of small businesses in the US. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(3), 201-208. Plsek, P., & Wilson, T. (2001). Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organizations. British Medical Journal (BMJ), 323, 746–749. Pope, J. (2001). Confronting Corruption: the Elements of National Integrity System. Transparency International, London. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. Sage. Pratt, V. (2001). Sharing Business Skills in Kenya. Washington, DC: Center for International Private Enterprise. http://www.cipe.org (accessed 23rd May, 2017.) Press, cop. Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. Qian, G., & Li, L. (2003). Profitability of small‐ and medium‐ sized enterprises in high‐ tech industries: the case of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9), 881-887. Quaye, D. M., & Acheampong, G. (2013). Are SME owner-managers entrepreneurs? Evidence from Ghana. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(23), 37-47. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761-787. 148 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Reich, R. B. (1987). Entrepreneurship reconsidered: The team as hero. Harvard Business Review, 65(May/June), 77-83. Riedel, H., Massoglia, S., Schlessinger, J., & Ullrich, A. (1988). Ligand activation of overexpressed epidermal growth factor receptors transforms NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 85(5), 1477-1481. Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A., & Swartz, E. (1998). Research in business and management. London: Sage. Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54-74. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. (2nd. Ed). Blackwell Publishing. Malden. Robson, P. J. A., Haugh, H. M., & Obeng, B. A. (2009). Entrepreneurship and innovation in Ghana: Enterprising Africa. Small Business Economics, 32(3), 31-50. Roper, S., & Hart, M. (2013). Supporting sustained growth among SMEs–policy models and guidelines. ERC White Paper, (7). Rouditser, D. & McKeown, T. (2015). The Rhetoric and realities of HRM evolution in SME growth, paper presented at 28th Annual SEAANZ Conference Proceedings, Melbourne, 1-3 July. Ruzzier, M., Antoncic, B., Hisrich, R. D., & Konecnik, M. (2007). Human capital and SME internationalization: A structural equation modeling study. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 24(1), 15- 29. Saeed, M. S. & Ibrahim, F. (2016). Perception and Importance of Entrepreneurial Leadership in Small and Medium Sized Companies. Case Studies in Business and Management, 3(1), 64. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, UK; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Sashkin, M., & Rosenbach, W. E. (1998). A new vision of leadership. Contemporary issues in leadership, 4. Saunders, M. L., & Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. (4th Ed). Harlow: FT Prentice Hall. Sauser, W. I. (2005). Starting your own business? Prepare for success. SAM Management in Practice, 3(1), 1-4. 149 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. (2nd ed.), Rand McNally, Chicago. Schillo, R. S. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Company Performance: Can the Academic Literature Guide Managers? Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(2). Schmiemann, M. (2008). Enterprises by size class-overview of SMEs in the EU. Statistics in focus, 31, 2008. Schmitz, H. (1995). Collective efficiency: Growth path for small‐ scale industry. The Journal of Development Studies, 31(4), 529-566. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453. Schoar, A. (2010). The divide between subsistence and transformational entrepreneurship. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 10(1), 57-81. Schoemaker, P. J. (2008). The future challenges of business: Rethinking management education. California Management Review, 50(3), 119-139. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Creative destruction. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 825. Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 189-213. Seltzer, J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16(4), 693-703. Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing. Shane, S. A. (Ed.). (2007). Economic development through entrepreneurship: Government, university and business linkages. Edward Elgar Publishing. Si, S. X. & Bruton, G. D. (2005). Knowledge acquisition, cost saving and strategic positioning: effects on Sino-American IJV performance. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1465-73. Siegel, D. S., & Renko, M. (2012). The role of market and technological knowledge in recognizing entrepreneurial opportunities. Management Decision, 50(5), 797-816. Silver, A. D. (1985). Entrepreneurial megabucks: the 100 greatest entrepreneurs of the last 25 years. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Sirelli, G. (2000, November). Innovation and firm performance, summary of session C. In Conference innovation and enterprise creation: Statistics and indicators (pp. 23-24). 150 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9-38. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Methods. London: Sage. Song, X. M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (1998). Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products. Journal of product Innovation Management, 15(2), 124- 135. Stangler, D., & Litan, R. E. (2009). Where Will the Jobs Come From? Kansas City, MO: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. Steel, W. F. & Webster, L. M. (1991). Small Enterprises in Ghana: Responses to Adjustment Industry. Series Paper, No. 33. The World Bank Industry and Energy Department, Washington DC. Stefanovic, I., Prokic, S., & Rankovic, L. (2010). Motivational and success factors of entrepreneurs: the evidence from a developing country. Journal of Economics and Business, 28(2), 251-269. Stevenson, H. H., & Jarrillo-Mossi, J. C. (1986). Preserving entrepreneurship as companies grow. Journal of Business Strategy, 7(1), 10-23. Stevenson, L. (1998). “Women and Economic Development: A Focus on Entrepreneurship,” Journal of Development Planning, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, 18(special issue), 113–126. Stewart, W. H., Watson, W. E., Carland, J. C., & Carland, J. W. (1998). A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. Journal of Business venturing, 14(2), 189-214. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks. Storey, D. (1994). Understanding the Small Business Sector. Routledge, London. Surie, G., & Ashley, A. (2008). Integrating pragmatism and ethics in entrepreneurial leadership for sustainable value creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 235-246. Sutton, J., & Kpentey, B. (2012). An enterprise map of Ghana (Vol. 2). International Growth Centre in association with the London Publishing Partnership. Tagoe, N., Nyarko, E., & Anuwa‐ Amarh, E. (2005). Financial challenges facing urban SMEs under financial sector liberalization in Ghana. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(3), 331-343. 151 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Taiwo, J. N., Falohun, T. O., & Agwu, M. E. (2016). SMES financing and its effects on Nigerian economic growth. European Journal of Business, Economics and Accountancy, 4(4). Tarabishy, A., Solomon, G., Fernald Jr, L. W., & Sashkin, M. (2005). The entrepreneurial leader's impact on the organization's performance in dynamic markets. The Journal of private equity, 8(4), 20-29. Taylor, S. E., & Schroeder, K. (2003). Inside Intuit: How the makers of Quicken beat Microsoft and revolutionized an entire industry. Harvard Business Press. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meaning. (2nd Ed), John Wiley & Sons, Canada. Teal, F. (2002). Background Information on Use Of Dataset: Regional Project On Enterprise Development (RPED) Ghana Manufacturing Sector Survey Waves IV (1992-98). Centre for the Study of African Economies, Institute of Economics and Statistics, University of Oxford, St. Cross Building, Manor Road, Oxford, OX1 3UL. Tetteh-Ossom, H. P. (2013). Causes of Credit Non-Payment in Commercial Banks: SMEs’ Perspective. Doctoral dissertation. KNUST. Teyi, S. S. (2014). Entrepreneurship education: A Case study of Ghana’s premiere university. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of Ghana Business School. Thornberry, N. (2006). Lead like an Entrepreneur: Keeping the Entrepreneurial Spirit Alive within the Corporation. New York: McGraw-Hill. Tsamenyi, M., Enninful-Adu, E., & Onumah, J. (2007). Disclosure and corporate governance in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(3), 319- 334. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2008). Opportunity identification and pursuit: Does an entrepreneur’s human capital matter? Small Business Economics, 30(2), 153- 173. UNDP (2017). About Ghana. Retrieved from http://www.gh.undp.org/content/ghana/en/home/countryinfo.html (Accessed on 20/06/2017) Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 341-358. 152 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Valdiserri, G. A., & Wilson, J. L. (2010). The study of leadership in small business organizations: Impact on profitability and organizational success. The Entrepreneurial Executive, 15, 47. Vecchio, R. P. (2003). Entrepreneurship and leadership: common trends and common threads. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 303-327. Veeraraghavan, V. (2009). Entrepreneurship and innovation. Asia Pacific Business Review, 5(1), 14-20. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 3(1), 119-138. Verhees, F. J., & Meulenberg, M. T. (2004). Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 134-154. Vermeulen, P. A., De Jong, J. P., & O'shaughnessy, K. C. (2005). Identifying key determinants for new product introductions and firm performance in small service firms. The Service Industries Journal, 25(5), 625-640. Villars E.J. (2006). Capital Market-The missing key to Ghana’s economic growth and development, Presented by the securities industry week public lectures. Vlek, C., & Stallen, P. J. (1981). Judging risks and benefits in the small and in the large. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28(2), 235-271. Waddock, S., & Steckler, E. (2016). Visionaries and Wayfinders: Deliberate and Emergent Pathways to Vision in Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 719- 734. Walsham, G. (1995b). The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information systems research, 6(4), 376-394. Wang, C. L., Tee, D. D., & Ahmed, P. K. (2012). Entrepreneurial leadership and context in Chinese firms: a tale of two Chinese private enterprises. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(4), 505-530. Webster, M. (1966).The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Routledge www.asiaentrepreneurshipjournal.com Weinstein, N. D. (1984). Why it won't happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychology, 3(5), 431. Westerberg, M., & Wincent, J. (2008). Network capability and entrepreneurship: refinement of a scale and test of a framework. In AGSE International Entrepreneurship Research Exchange: 05/02/2008-07/02/2008. AGSE, Swinburne University of Technology. 153 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Whitley, R. (1984). The fragmented state of management studies: reasons and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 21(3), 331-348. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge‐ based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐ sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307-1314. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71-91. Wilson, H. S., & Hutchinson, S. A. (1996). Methodologic mistakes in grounded theory. Nursing Research, 45(2), 122-124. Wofford, J. C., & Goodwin, V. L. (1994). A cognitive interpretation of transactional and transformational leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 161-186. World Bank. (1993). Global Economic Prospects. Washington, DC. Wright, P., Kroll, M., Pray, B., & Lado, A. (1995). Strategic orientations, competitive advantage, and business performance. Journal of Business Research, 33(2), 143-151. Wright, M., Roper, S., Hart, M., & Carter, S. (2015). Joining the dots: Building the evidence base for SME growth policy. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 3-11. Yang, Y. F. (2009). An investigation of group interaction functioning stimulated by transformational leadership on employee intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction: An extension of the resource-based theory perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(9), 1259-1277. Yeboah, A. M. (2015). Determinants of SME Growth: An Empirical Perspective of SMEs in The Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana. The Journal of Business in Developing Nations, 14. Yin, R. (2003). Case study methodology. Sage, New York. Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications. Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Publications. Yu, F. L., & Kwan, D. S. (2015). Chinese Entrepreneurship: An Austrian Economics Perspective. London, New York: Routledge Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23-40. Zaman, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial characteristics among university students: Implications for entrepreneurship education and training in Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 7(39), 4053. 154 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Zikmund, W. G. (1994). Exploring Marketing Research. (5th Ed), Forth Worth, TX: Dryden 155 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh APPENDICES APPENDIX 1: INTERVIEW GUIDE TOPIC: ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP AND SME GROWTH: LESSONS FROM TRANSFORMATIONAL ENTREPRENEURS IN GHANA. Exchange of pleasantries and a brief background of the study 1) Please give me a brief introduction of yourself- name, educational level, marital status, 2) I would also like to know the history of this great enterprise 3) What motivated you to start this enterprise? 4) What are some of the challenges that you came across? 5) In the beginning, did you intend the small enterprise to grow beyond yourself? did u envision the SME (in the beginning) to be this big after some years? 6) Has your human capital (i.e. the investment made in yourself through education, skills training, experience, etc) contributed to the growth of your company? 7) How? And in what ways? 8) How will you conceptualise the growth of your company (in terms of profitability, market share, assets and size)? 9) Describe your leadership style. How has it affected the growth of your company? 10) How do you understand the concept of entrepreneurial leadership? 11) Describe who an entrepreneurial leader is. Are you one? 12) How do you understand the following: -an entrepreneur is innovative -an entrepreneur is proactive -an entrepreneur is risk-loving -an entrepreneur is visionary -an entrepreneur is able to motivate his followers 13) In what ways have you been innovative, proactive, risk-loving, a visionary, and motivating? -Has it influenced the growth of your company? How? 14) How do you influence your employees to copy you? 15) In ensuring the growth of your enterprise as an entrepreneurial leader, what are some of the challenges you come/came across? 16) How do/did you surmount/overcome them? 17) Did government support help you in growing your business? 18) Why do you think a lot of SMEs in Ghana have not grown into large organisations like yours? 19) Would you conclude that human capital is important to the growth of SMEs? Why? 20) Would you conclude that being a transformational entrepreneur is important to the growth of SMEs? Why? 21) Would you conclude that being an entrepreneurial leader (not just a leader nor entrepreneur) is important to the growth of SMEs? Why? 156 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh APPENDIX 2: EXCERPT OF RESPONDENT 4 (CASE AJ’s) INTERVIEW I: Okay. But can you add some more adjectives, you mentioned the risk taker, maybe how you can describe the entrepreneurial leader. AJ: Okay, I wrote something, so I would just pick it. Some of the definitions don’t come easily. Leadership magazine and eerm. I: Okay. AJ: … A classic example from a Harvard study stated that, two German brothers went to China (couldn’t remember the exact country, but used China) and they found out that, everyone walking there had no shoes but these two brothers had shoe factories in Germany. So one brother said, I don’t know how long is going to take me to convince these people to wear shoes. They don’t even know what shoe is about so I cannot work in this environment, am going back. The other one said: “they do not have shoes, my God, what an opportunity”. So I will be more creative. Once I give people free shoes and they realise that their feet do not get hurt, it is protected and all that, I will make money from China and indeed he became the biggest shoe maker in his time and that place. The other one just concentrated on his German, European market but look at the market that he created for 1.6billion people. His business had gone exponentially immediately. So you have to look at unmet needs and see how you can carve your niche wherever you want to. “It is also about providing employment to others and supporting them with their growth and development”. Because you know that you cannot do it alone, you should get another person. Most of my staff here, I take them green. I don’t head- hunt. I don’t head-hunt especially with those who work with the decorators and all that. I like to take you green because I want you to learn my style of doing things. I don’t like taking people with background of I’m a decorator. They come already too knowing. Keep training them and therefore you are providing a skill to those people who did not have ideas since SHS. The university graduates who are here have learnt how to write proposals because they have responsible for that in other to send to our clients and make our pitch. So they have learnt new things. I: That’s very interesting. You mentioned some words, the innovative, you were looking at reaching out to them as visionaries. AJ: You must be a visionary. I: Yes. ………………………………………………………………………….. I: Thank you very much for your time. 157 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh EXHIBIT 1: PHOTO OF RESPONDENT 1’s AWARDS 158 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh EXHIBIT 2: PHOTO OF RESPONDENT 2’s AWARDS 159