QL536. B43 bite C.1 THE BALME LIBRARY University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh VECTOR COMPETENCE OF THE ANOPHELES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) POPULATIONS FOR WUCHERERIA BANCROFTI (SPIRURIDA: FILARIIDAE), AFTER MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION IN THE GOMOA DISTRICT OF GHANA BY BETHEL KWANSA-BENTUM (BSc Hons) University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh VECTOR COMPETENCE OF THE ANOPHELES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) POPULATIONS FOR WUCHERERIA BANCROFTI (SPIRURIDA: FILARIIDAE) AFTER MASS DRUG ADMINISTRATION IN THE GOMOA DISTRICT OF GHANA BY BETHEL KWANSA-BENTUM (BSc Hons) (10174126) THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF RESEARCH AND GRADUATE STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF GHANA - LEGON, IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT FOR THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE IN ZOOLOGY (APPLIED PARASITOLOGY) MAY 2005 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh I hereby declare that except for references to other people’s work, which have duly been acknowledged, this exercise is a result of my own research and this thesis neither in whole nor in part, had been presented for another degree elsewhere. DECLARATION (CANDIDATE) PROFESSOR MICHAEL DAVID WILSON (SUPERVISOR) (SUPERVISOR) University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DEDICATION THIS WORK IS DEDICATED TO THE ANAA-BENTUM FAMILY FOR THEIR LOVE, SUPPORT, AND ENCOURAGEMENTS THAT HAVE BROUGHT MY EDUCATION THIS FAR University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is my first duty to acknowledge with pleasure, my indebtedness to all the individuals, organisations and institutions that contributed in various ways to the formulation, execution and submission of the work described in the thesis. I am very much thankful to Professor David Ofori-Adjei, the Director of the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana, Legon for permitting me to use the facilities of the Institute. I wish to express my heartfelt gratitude and deep appreciation to my supervisors Dr. Daniel Adjei Boakye and Professor Michael David Wilson, both of Parasitology Department of NMIMR. Their expert guidance made a great impact in achieving this goal. I am also indebted to Mr. Maxwell Appawu, Dr. Kwabena Mante Bosompem, Dr. Charles Brown and Professor Dominic Edoh for the invaluable contribution to this work. Their patience and constructive criticisms during the conduct of the study made this dream a reality. I also acknowledge the timely contributions by the following colleagues; Ms. Yvonne Aryeetey, Fred Aboagye-Antwi, Evans D. Glah, Sampson Otoo, Philip Doku, Joseph Otchere, Haruna Abdul, Charles Quaye and Yaw Gaisah. My appreciation also goes to the volunteers who availed themselves as sources of blood meal for the mosquitoes to feed on, without them the work would not have been done. I thank the entire staff of the Parasitology Department (NMIMR); Ms. Helena Baidoo, Ms. Naiki Puplampu, Ms. Irene Larbi, Mrs. Beverly Egyir, Mrs. Mercy Mintah Afari, Dziedzom de Souza, Jonas Asigbee, Daniel Boamah, Tony Tetteh, Osei Agyeman Duah and Joseph University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Quartey for their support throughout the study. I also thank all lecturers of Zoology and Biochemistry Departments of the University of Ghana, for their invaluable support. My appreciation also goes to Mrs. Benedicta Kuivi, Mrs. Anastasia Aikins, Ms. Afua Okobea Anti, Ms. Abena Amoah, Ms. Gloria Ivy Mensah, Ms. Melody Ocloo, Ms. Rita Amegadzie, Ms. Evelyn Stacy Adjei, Ms. Angela Parry-Hanson, Daniel Amoako-Sakyi, Selorme Adukpo, Ernest Afful, Emmanuel Tender, Tony Osei Agyeman, Thomas Oguah, Enyam Lumor, Dr. Frank Osei and all my friends who encouraged me to get the work reported in this thesis. I am above all grateful to the Almighty God for taking me through this course of study and the gift of life. This work was supported by WHO/ TDR Research Grant to Dr. Daniel Adjei Boakye (identification number: A00638) and was undertaken as part of a five year WHO/ TDR LFII project entitled “Trend levels in the transmission of lymphatic filariasis before and after mass drug administration of ivermectin and albendazole’1. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ................................................................................................................... •* DEDICATION............................................................................................................................. “ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ u» TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................ v LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS..................................................................................................... LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................... xii LIST OF PLATES.................................................................................................................... xiii LIST OF APPENDICES..........................................................................................................xiv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................xv ABSTRACT................. .xvu CHAPTER ONE.............................. 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Rationale of Study............................................................................................................3 1.2.1 Aim of study..........................................................................................................4 1.2.2 Specific objectives.................................................................................................4 CHAPTER TWO......................................................................................................................... .. LITERATURE REVIEW........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 The Disease.................................................................................................................... .. v University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.1.1 Global distribution of lymphatic filariasis............................................................... ' 2.1.2 Pathogenesis and pathology..................................................................................... 9 2.1.3 Clinical features of the disease.............................................................................. 13 2.1.4 Asymptomatic presentations of the disease.........................................................15 2.1.5 Clinical diagnosis of Wuchereria bancrofti infection in humans........................15 2.1.5.1 Immunological detection of microfilaria....................................................... 16 2.1.5.2 Morphological detection of microfilaria................................ 17 2.1.5.3 Molecular detection of microfilaria................................................................18 2.1.5.4 Detection of lymphatic filarial infection by X-ray.......................................20 2.1.6 Prevention of the disease....................................................................................... 20 2.1.7 Treatment of the disease........................................................................................ 22 2.1.8 Management of the disease....................................................................................23 2.2 Biology and Life Cycle of Wuchereria bancrofti......................................................24 2.3 Biology and Life Cycle of the Vectors.......................................................................27 2.3.1 Biology of the vectors............................................................................................ 27 2.3.2 Anopheles gambiae complex and An. funestus group.......................................... 31 2.3.3 Life cycle of the vectors......................................................................................... 32 2.4 Molecular Characterisation of Anopheles Population........................................... 36 2.4.1 PCR-RFLP identification o f Anopheles funestus and An. gambiae species complex............................................................................................................................ 3 7 2.5 Detection of Wuchereria bancrofti in Mosquito Vectors........................................ 39 2.5.1 Microscopy.............................................................................................................3 9 2.5.2 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)........................................................................40 2 .6 Factors Affecting the Transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti...............................40 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.6.1 Infection in the human population ...............................................................- 4U 2.6.2 Vectorial capacity .......................... 41 2.6.2.1 Vector density relative to man and human feeding habit of vector.............41 2.6 .2.2 Vector survival and time from infection to infectivity.................................42 2.6.3 Vectorial competence...................................................... 42 2.6.3.1 Parasite uptake.................... 43 2.6.3.2 Parasite development to infective larvae (L3) ............................................... 44 2.6.3.3 Density dependent processes in the vector....................................................44 2.6.3.4 Parasite induced vector mortality................................................................... 45 2.6.4 Climatic factors............... 46 2.6.4.1 Temperature ..................................................................... 47 2.6.4.2 Sunshine...........................................................................................................47 2 6.4.3 Rainfall ................................................................................................48 2.6.4.4 Relative humidity....................... 48 CHAPTER THREE................................................................................................................... 49 MATERIALS AND METHODS............................................................................................ 49 3.1 Chemicals, Reagents and Equipments......................................... 49 3.2 Study Site...................................................................................................................... 49 3.3 Ethical Considerations................................................................................................52 3.4 Mass Screening for Microfilaria and Feeding Experiment................................... 52 3.5 Laboratory Studies......................................................................................................55 3.5.1 Morphological identification, maintenance and dissection of mosquitoes 5 5 3.5.2 Molecular Studies............................... 5 8 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 3.5.2.1 Chemicals, reagents and solutions.......................................................... -><> 3.5.2.2 PCR-RFLP species identification of molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex................................................................................................58 3.5.2.2.1 Genomic DNA extraction........................................................................58 3.5.2.2.2 PCR amplification.................................................................................... 59 3.5.2.2.3 Molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s. identification................... 60 3.5.2.3 Identification of members of the Anopheles funestus group........................ 60 3.5.2.3.1 Genomic DNA extraction........................................................................60 3.5.2.3.2 PCR amplification.................................................................................... 61 3.5.2.4 Species identification of Wuchereria bancrofti............................................ 61 3.5.2.4.1 Genomic DNA extraction......................................................................61 3.5.2A2 PCR identification of Wuchereria bancrofti.......................................... 62 3.5.2.5 Observation and analyses of amplified PCR-RFLP products...................... 63 3.6 Sampling Method and Data Analysis......................................................................64 CHAPTER FOUR...................................................................................................................... 65 RESULTS................................................................................................................................ 65 4.1 Microfilaraemia Load in the Study Area..................................................................65 4.2 Collection and Dissection of Mosquitoes...................................................................68 4.3 Molecular Identification of Anopheles funestus and An. gambiae Species Complexes............................................................ 75 4.4 PCR Identification of Wuchereria bancrofti............................................................ 75 CHAPTER FIVE...................................................................................................................... .. DISCUSSION............................................................................................................................ University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS..................................... 85 REFERENCES______________________________________________________________86 APPENDICES 107 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Figure 1: Global distribution of lymphatic filariasis....................................................... Figure 2: Clinical presentations of bancroftian filariasis in adult populations living in LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS filariasis endemic areas.........................................................................................................12 Figure 3: Schematic diagram of the life cycle of Wuchereria bancrofti.................................26 Figure 4: Eggs of mosquitoes.....................................................................................................28 Figure 5: Mosquito egg rafts and clusters attached to underside of a floating leaf................28 Figure 7: Map of Ghana showing the study site, Gomoa District........................................... 51 Figure 8: Generic composition of of the mosquitoes caught during the feeding experiment 69 Figure 9: Variation of Anopheles species and the geometric mean intensity (geomean) of microfilaraemia among the twelve consented volunteers observed during the collection of mosquitoes.......................................................................................................... 70 Figure 10: Photograph of an example of ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel (2%) electrophoregram of amplified PCR products for the identification of Anopheles gambiae s.l. species..............................................................................................................76 Figure 11: Photograph of an example ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel (2%) electrophoregram of PCR amplified products for the identification of Anopheles funestus s.l. species.............................................................................................................. 7 7 Figure 12: Photograph of ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel (2%) electrophoregram of Hha I restriction enzyme digest for the identification of molecular forms o f Anopheles gambiae s.s............................................................................................ University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Figure 13: Photograph of an example of ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel (2%) electrophoregram analysis of a PCR diagnostic test for detection of Wuchereria bancrofti..................................................................................................................... University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Table 1: The numbers of individuals examined and number of cases in the nine study sites 6 6 Table 2: The geometric mean intensities of Wuchereria bancrofti infections in the nine study sites**...................................................................................................................................67 Table 4: Distribution of infected mosquitoes and number of m f ingested by mosquitoes .... 71 Table 5: Distribution of infected and infective Anopheles mosquitoes, and number of m f ingested by female Anopheles mosquitoes caught during the study.................................72 Table 6 : Distribution of infection with Wuchereria bancrofti in the various mosquito species caught after 13 days of maintenance...................................................................................7 3 Table 7: Distribution of infection with Wuchereria bancrofti in the Anopheles mosquitoes caught after 13 days of maintenance...................................................................................74 LIST OF TABLES University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Plate 1: Finger prick blood being taken from a volunteer sleeping under mosquito net. 54 Plate 2: Boxes with netted paper-cups containing the collected mosquitoes at the insectary .........................................................................................................................................58 LIST OF PLATES xiii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Appendix I: Preparation of standard solutions........................................................................ 107 Appendix II: Sequence of the synthetic oligonucleotide primers used in the molecular studies................................................................................................................................. 1 1 0 Appendix III: Constituents of a 2 0 jllL PCR reaction mix used in the molecular studies.... 113 Appendix IV:Information and consent form ...........................................................................116 Appendix V: The hourly examinations of blood for Wuchereria bancrofti among the twelve consented volunteers during the mosquito collection...................................................... 121 Appendix VI: The number of subjects examined, number of positive and mfJ ml intensity of blood among the age groupings during mass screening for Wuchereria bancrofti in the individual communities...................................................................................................... 1 2 2 Appendix Vila: Entomological survey sheet.......................................................................... 131 Appendix Vllb: Mosquito dissection entry sheet...................................................................132 LIST OF APPENDICES xiv University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ADLA LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Acute Dermatolymphangioadenitis AFL Acute Filarial Lymphangitis ANOVA One-way analysis of variance bp base pair CFA Circulating Filarial Antigen CIOMS Council for Intemationaal Organisations of Medical Science DEC Diethylcarbamazine DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid DNTPs Deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates EDTA Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid ELISA Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay GMI Geometric Mean Intensity GPELF Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis IgE, IgG4 Immunoglobins E, G4 IGS Intergenic Spacer IL-4, IL-5, IL-10 Interleukins-4, 5, 10 ITS Internal Transcribed Spacer Li First stage larvae of mf L2 Second stage larvae of mf u Human infective third-stage larvae u Fourth stage larvae of mf mf microfilariae University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh OCP Onchocerciasis Control Programme PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction RAPD Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA rDNA Ribosomal DNA RFLP Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms RNAse Ribonuclease rpm Revolution per minute s.l. sensu latu s.s. sensu stricto SDS Sodium deodecylsulphate SSCP Single-Stranded Conformation Polymorphism TAE Tris-acetate EDTA Tm Melting temperature TPE Tropical Pulmonary Eosinophilia Tris 2-amino- 1 -hydroxyl-1,3-propanediol VNTR Variable Number of Tandem Repeats WHO World Health Organisation xvi University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ABSTRACT Ability of mosquitoes to ingest microfilariae (mf), promote their maturation to the infective stage, and their survival rate to parasite maturation for transmission to humans seems to differ according to geographic mosquito strains. The proportion of ingested mf that develops successfully into L3 may decrease (limitation) or increase (facilitation) with higher mf uptake. Transmission intensity depends on a number of factors such as the level of infection in the human population, vectorial capacity, vectorial competence, and climatic factors. Results obtained from a preliminary study after three years of mass drug administration (MDA) showed a decrease in annual transmission potential (ATP) o f Anopheles funestus but no change in An. gambiae s.s. This study was conducted to determine the vector competence of these two Anopheles species in the transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti at low mf levels. Mass screening for mf was done using IOOjllI finger-prick blood and consented positive individuals who volunteered and slept under mosquito nets that had one side opened. Wild mosquitoes that fed on them were collected hourly from 21:00 to 06:00 hours GMT. Approximately half of the mosquitoes were killed immediately and dissected to count the number of mf ingested. The remaining mosquitoes were maintained for 13 days to observe parasite maturation after which they were dissected. Along side the mosquito collection, lOOjutl finger-prick blood was collected hourly to observe m f level in peripheral blood. The overall prevalence of mf in the study community (N = 1083) was 1.6%. The levels of mf varied from 0 to 59 mf7 100jLtl blood, with a geometric mean intensity of 1.1 mf7 ml. Some variation in intensity with age-group was observed, however neither the intensities in age group (P = 0.40) nor the intensities in the male and female subjects (P = 0.91) were significant. Out of the 564 mosquitoes collected, 62.1% were Anopheles species, 32.3% Mansonia species, 5% Aedes species and 0.7% Culex species. Anopheles funestus and An. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh gambiae formed 8 8 .6% and 9.1% of Anopheles caught respectively. Both mf level in peripheral blood and biting rates of the Anopheles mosquitoes peaked between 00:00 and 03:00 hours. Six mosquitoes each o f Anopheles (1.7%) and Mansonia (3.3%) were found infected but none was infective after day 13 of maintenance. Molecular studies showed all Anopheles gambiae s.l. to be An. gambiae s.s. out of which 70% were M form. All infected Anopheles gambiae were M forms. A total of 8 6% of the An. funestus were identified as An. funestus s.s. with 6% being An. leesoni. Although these Anopheles species were not competent in promoting the maturation of the parasites when mf is low, a repeat of this study targeting larger mosquito numbers is required to ascertain the role played especially by M forms of An. gambiae in the transmission of lymphatic filariasis when parasite levels in the community are low. Considering the fact that the study was conducted in the natural setting, this finding will help as to whether the combination therapy with ivermectin and albendazole is enough to eliminate the disease or vector management has to be integrated for the success of the GPELF in areas like Ghana where Anopheles gambiae and An. funestus are the main vectors. University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER ONE GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction The relationship between ingestion of microfilariae (mf), production of infective larvae (L3) and mf density in human blood has been suggested as an important determinant in the transmission dynamics of lymphatic filariasis (Albuquerque et al., 1999). Understanding vector-parasite interactions is thus, essential for assessing the prospects of elimination and rational development of control strategies. This is particularly important, considering that vectorial competence (the ability of mosquitoes to ingest mf and to promote their maturation until the infective stage), and the rate of mosquito survival until parasite maturation (Failloux et al., 1995; Bryan et al., 1990), seems to differ according to geographic mosquito strains (Crans, 1973; McGreevy et al., 1982; Wharton, 1960). Variation in density of m f in blood and parasite behaviour also influences vector-parasite relationships (Failloux et al., 1995; Southgate and Bryan, 1992; Tabachnick et a l , 1985). Studies on the factors that affect transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti by anopheline mosquitoes include the uptake of mf by mosquitoes, which depend on the density and distribution of mf in the human host (Bryan and Southgate, 1988; Samarawickrema et al., 1985). The ratio of numbers of ingested mf to numbers of infective larvae, which subsequently develop is another important effect on the transmission dynamics of W. bancrofti. Vector competence involves three processes; the uptake of mf from the human 1 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh host, the development of mf to the infective-stage larvae (L3) and the transmission of L3 to human (Subramanian et al., 1997). Changes in climatic factors such as temperature, rainfall and sunshine affect human health and disease vector populations in various parts of the globe in very different ways, often through complex changes in ecological systems. It is the interaction among these factors in combination with other non-climatic factors that will determine the timing of infectious disease outbreaks. The female mosquito becomes infected with Wuchereria bancrofti if it sucks blood from an infected person, and may then infect the next person it bites. The spread of the disease is thus limited by conditions that favour the vector and the parasite growth. For the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) to be successful, the ability of various mosquito vectors to pick the mf (especially when the community m f load is low), support the development of the ingested m f into L3, and to transmit those L3 to humans has to be understood. Some species of mosquito (those exhibiting the phenomenon of facilitation) are unable to transmit parasites from humans with low levels of microfilaraemia whereas other species (exhibiting limitation) can effectively transmit the parasites even when the mf in their blood meal source is at a very low level. The quantitative relations of transmission intensity and mf reservoir such as the proportion (40 60%) of ingested mfs which are damaged by the pharyngeal foregut armature of Anopheles mosquitoes, percentage of mosquitoes ingesting mf and host m f density, also the percentage of mosquitoes infected or mf density per mosquito and numbers of mf per 2 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh millilitre of host blood have been found to vary among members of the Anopheles gambiae complex and. An. funestus (Bryan and Southgate, 1988; McGreevy et al.9 1982; Bryan et al., 1990). 1.2 Rationale of Study Several sympatric Anopheles species that are vectors of lymphatic filariasis in Ghana might differ in vectorial role and capacity to transmit low-density mf. Dzodzomenyo et a l (1999) identified An. gambiae and An. funestus as the most important vectors of the disease along the coast of Ghana. The parent project of which this work is a sub-component seeks to investigate the trends in levels of transmission and infection with W. bancrofti during mass treatment with ivermectin and albendazole in some communities of Gomoa District of the Central Region of Ghana. The preliminary results seem to indicate that although transmission potential of An. funestus has decreased significantly after mass chemotherapy with ivermectin and albendazole, there appears to be no change in that for An. gambiae s.s. in the area. A similar study in the Bongo District of Northern Ghana showed a probable relationship of limitation between W. bancrofti and An. gambiae s.l., An. funestus or both taxa (Boakye et al., 2004). This work therefore sets out to determine the roles of the two different Anopheles species in transmission of W. bancrofti at low m f levels since this information is crucial to the success of the Global Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Programme. 3 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 1-2.1 Aim of study The main aim of the study is to look at the competence of Anopheles gambiae s.s. and An. funestus in the transmission of lymphatic filariasis after mass drug treatment with ivermectin and albendazole in an endemic area of the Gomoa District of Ghana. 1.2.2 Specific objectives The specific objectives of this study are: 1. To determine the importance of low density microfilaraemia in the transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti. 2. To ascertain the intensity of lymphatic filariasis transmission in the study area. 3. To evaluate the vector competence of W. bancrofti in Anopheles gambiae and An. funestus after feeding on humans with varying densities of mf. 4. To identify by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) the sibling species of An. gambiae s.s. and An. funestus collected. 5. To identify and determine the distribution of the M and S forms of An. gambiae s.s. by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). 6 . To confirm the W. bancrofti in the human population and the mosquitoes using PCR. 4 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 The Disease Lymphatic filariasis (LF) commonly known as elephantiasis is caused by the mosquito-borne parasitic nematodes Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi and B. timori that live almost exclusively in humans of which W. bancrofti makes up about 90% of the cases (Michael et al., 1996). These worms lodge in the human lymphatic system, the network of nodes and vessels that maintain the delicate fluid balance between the tissues and blood, which is an essential component for the body's immune defence system. The adult filarial worms live for 4-6 years in the vessels of the lymphatic system causing the vessels to dilate leading to dysfunction due to the slow movement of lymph fluid (WHO, 2000) due to decrease in pressure of lymph flow. Large numbers of bacteria build up that are not filtered away in acute stage leading to blockade of the vessels. The adult worms produce millions of immature mf (minute larvae) that circulate in the blood, which may be picked up by mosquitoes, therefore spreading the infection to others. About 20-50 % of men and up to 10% of women in endemic communities can be affected (WHO, 2000). Lymphatic filariasis causes enlargement of the entire leg or arm, the genitals (vulva, scrotum) and breast in its most obvious manifestations. The adult worms cause internal damage to the kidneys, lymphatic system and the disabilities caused by the disease have considerable economic impact on affected communities (WHO, 2000). It is a major cause of poverty and people afflicted do not live normal working and social life. The psychological and social 5 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh stigmata associated with these aspects of the disease are immense, including reduced marital prospects (Ramaiah et aL, 1997; Ahorlu et al 2001). The disease was generally thought to occur once a while in children although recognized as an infection of adults (Witt and Ottesen, 2001). New highly sensitive diagnostic tests such as antigen detection and ultrasound examination, now reveal the disease is primarily acquired in childhood, often before age 5 (Witt and Ottesen, 2001). Individual case reports and numerous community-based epidemiological studies attest both to the existence of lymphatic filariasis infection in children and the occurrence of clinically evident disease. Microfilaraemia prevalence in children from different populations is related significantly to the level of endemicity seen in their respective adult populations (WHO, 2000). Initial damage to the lymphatic system by the parasites generally remains hidden for years or gives rise to presentations of adenitis (adenopathy), but especially after puberty lymphoedema (elephantiasis) and hydrocoele which are the characteristic clinical features begin to develop. Recognizing lymphatic filariasis as a disease of childhood has immediate practical implications both for management and prevention in individual patients and for broader public health efforts to overcome the crippling, debilitating diseases of childhood. Protecting children from lymphatic filariasis infection and disease should therefore be a primary goal of national elimination programmes. Recognizing this means children will not only be the principal benefactors of lymphatic filariasis elimination but also a population particularly important to target in order to achieve the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis twin goals of interrupting transmission and preventing disease (WHO, 2000). 6 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.1.1 Global distribution of lymphatic filariasis The disease affects 120 million people in more than 83 countries worldwide with 1.2 billion (20% of the world’s population) people at risk of acquiring infection (WHO, 2000). One third of these infected persons live in India, one-third in Africa (with prevalence rates exceeding 10% in 17 of 34 endemic countries). Most of the remainder occurs in Asia, the Pacific and the Americas. Wuchereria bancrofti cause ninety percent of these infections and most of the remainder by Brugia malayi (WHO, 2000). Even though certain strains of B. malayi can also infect some feline and monkey species, humans are the exclusive host for W. bancrofti. The life cycles in humans and in these animals remain epidemiologically distinct that overlap little (WHO, 2000). In most urban and semi-urban areas, the major vectors for W. bancrofti are Culex mosquitoes. Anopheles species is the major vector in rural areas of Africa and elsewhere, while Aedes mosquitoes in many of the endemic Pacific Islands. For the Brugian parasites, Mansonia species serve as the major vector, but in some areas anopheline mosquitoes are responsible for transmitting the infection. Brugian parasites are confined to areas of east and south Asia, especially India, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, and China. In Ghana, prevalence of lymphatic filariasis is between 9.2-25.4 % along the coast (Dunyo et ah, 1996) and 20-40 % in the northern regions (Gyapong et ai, 1996). 7 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.1.2 Pathogenesis and pathology The pathology associated with lymphatic filariasis results from a complex interplay of the pathogenic potential of the parasite, the immune response of the host, and external bacterial and fungal infections (WHO, 2000). In the absence of such overt inflammatory responses some changes that can lead to both lymphoedema and hydrocoele formation occurs. Genital damage particularly hydrocoele (collection of serous fluid in the cavity of the tunica vaginalis caused by lymphatic dysfunction) and chylocoele (collection of white fat-rich lymph fluid in the cavity of the tunica vaginalis caused by a ruptured dilated lymphatic vessel) occur. Others include chyluria (milky fluid caused by the presence of white lymph fluid that is rich in fat, resulting from a ruptured dilated lymphatic vessel in the excretory urinary tract) and lymph scrotum (superficial dilated lymphatic vessels of the scrotal skin with intermittent discharge of white or straw-coloured lymph fluid). The rest are disfiguring clinical presentation of lymphoedema (with hypertrophy and fibrosis of the skin and subcutaneous tissues as a result of long-term lymphoedema after recurrent skin bacterial episodes) known as acute dermatolymphangioadenitis (ADLA) are the most recognizable clinical entities associated with lymphatic filarial infections (WHO, 2000). There are much earlier stages of lymphatic pathology and dysfunction whose recognition has only recently been made possible through ultrasonographic and lymphoscintigraphic techniques (WHO, 2000). For example, ultrasonography has identified massive lymphatic dilation around and for several centimetres beyond adult filarial worms, which though in continuous vigorous motion, remain ’fixed’ at characteristic sites within lymphatic vessels. Dilation and proliferation of lymphatic endothelium can be identified histologically, and the 9 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh abnormal lymphatic function associated with these changes can be readily documented by lymphoscintigraphy (WHO, 2000). The immune system keeps itself 'down-regulated' through the production of contra- inflammatory immune molecules during the development of 'non-inflammatory pathology’. These are the characteristic mediators of Th2-type T-cell responses (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10) and antibodies of the IgG4 (non-complement-fixing) subclass that serve as "blocking antibodies" (WHO, 2000). Such adaptations serve to promote the biological principle of parasitism in which a satisfactory balance between parasite 'aggressiveness' and host responsiveness must evolve to maintain this special relationship. This response can be initiated by immune reactivity (clinically expressed as the characteristic adenitis and retrograde lymphangitis earlier described as 'filarial fevers') or by bacterial and fungal super infections of tissues with compromised lymphatic function originating from filarial infection (WHO, 2000). Recognition of the importance of these secondary infections in causing much of the progression and physical destruction associated with elephantiasis has had a major impact on improving the care, management and prospects for affected patients. Immune-mediated pathology in lymphatic filariasis most commonly derives from the lymphatic obstructive consequences of the responses to dead or dying worms in the lymphatics. However, tropical pulmonary eosinophilia (TPE) syndrome pathogenesis is distinctly different. Indeed, it is this syndrome that demonstrates most dramatically what happens when the immune system's response to the parasite goes unchecked (i.e., escapes the down-regulating mechanisms usually seen during patent infection). In TPE, there is 10 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh enormous immunologic hyper-responsiveness especially of IgE and other pro-inflammatory molecules directed against mf. This results in massive hyper-eosinophilia, allergic and other immunologic responses to those mf stage parasites causing them to be rapidly opsonized and cleared from the blood immediately as they pass through the lungs. The consequence of these unchecked, un-modulated responses and consequent inflammation is severe pulmonary functional compromise and tissue destruction that leads to crippling and permanent lung disease. Other clinical presentations include lymphangiectasia and acute filarial lymphangitis (AFL) and are shown in Figure 2. 11 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Figure 2: Clinical presentations of bancroftian filariasis in adult populations living in filariasis endemic areas. (a): Lymphangiectasia: dilation of lymphatic vessels (*) not caused by obstruction but by ‘toxins’ released by living filarial adult worms (arrows) in this context. No inflammatory reaction is found in the lymphatic vessel wall (**). Hematocyclin and eosin stained. (c): Acute skin bacterial episode: a reticular lymphangitis (*) caused by bacterial infection, currently named acute dermatolymphangioadenitis (ADLA) (b): Acute filarial lymphangitis (AFL) (arrows): caused by the death of adult worms (d): Lymphoedema: swelling of the skin, as a result of accumulation of interstitial fluid after recurrent bacterial infections, predisposed in its turn by lymphatic dysfunction 12 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.1.3 Clinical features of the disease There are chronic, acute and 'asymptomatic' presentations of lymphatic filarial disease, as well as a number of syndromes associated with these infections that may or not be caused by the parasites. Hydrocoele is found only with W. bancrofti infections (i.e. not Brugia infections) yet it is the most common clinical manifestation of lymphatic filariasis (WHO, 2000). The disease is not common in childhood but seen more frequently post-puberty and with a progressive increase in prevalence with age (Witt and Ottesen, 2001). In many endemic communities 40-60% of all adult males have hydrocoele (WHO, 2000). It often develops in the absence of overt inflammatory reactions, and many patients with hydrocoele also have microfilariae circulating in the blood. The mechanism of fluid accumulation in the tunica vaginalis is still unknown, but direct ultrasonographic evidence indicates that in bancroftian filariasis the scrotal lymphatic are the preferred site for localization of the adult worms, and their presence may stimulate not only the proliferation of lymphatic endothelium but also a transudation of Tiydrocoele fluid' whose chemical constituents are similar to those of serum (WHO, 2000). The localization of adult worms in the lymphatic of the spermatic cord leads to a thickening of the cord that is palpable on physical examination of most patients. The hydrocoele can become massive but still occur without lymphoedema or elephantiasis developing in the penis and scrotum, since the lymphatic drainage of these tissues is separate and more superficial. 13 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Recently filarial syndrome has been described as one of clinical and immOffologic hyper­ responsiveness found in expatriate visitors to regions endemic for loasis (WHO, 2000). This has also been described in patients with onchocerciasis, lymphatic filariasis, and other filarial infections (WHO, 2000). Persons who grow up outside endemic regions and then move to these regions and acquire filarial infection manifest prominent signs and symptoms of inflammatory (including allergic) reactions to the mature or maturing parasites instead of developing the commonly described chronic clinical manifestations. In loasis, manifestations primarily include Calabar swellings, hives, rashes and occasionally asthma whereas in bancroftian filariasis (migrants to endemic areas who acquire the infection), lymphangitis, lymphadenitis, genital pain (from inflammation of the associated lymphatic), along with hives, rashes and other 'allergic-like' manifestations, including blood eosinophilia are the symptoms. The different immunoregulatory responses to filarial antigens between those with long (including prenatal) exposure to these antigens and those meeting them for the first time leads to these different clinical presentations Other syndromes co-existing with filariasis are found in filarial endemic regions, and because they show some evidence of therapeutic response to diethylcarbamazine (DEC), they have been suggested as possible manifestations of lymphatic filariasis (WHO, 2000). These include arthritis (typically monoarticular), endomyocardial fibrosis, tenosynovitis, thrombophlebitis, glomerulonephritis, lateral popliteal nerve palsy, and others. While future studies may strengthen the relationships, such syndromes at present cannot confidently be attributed to filarial infection (WHO, 2000). 14 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.1.4 Asymptomatic presentations of the disease Though patients of lymphatic filariasis have mf circulating in their blood and essentially all have hidden damage to their lymphatic and/ or renal systems (microscopic heamaturia and/ or proteinuria), at least half appear clinically asymptomatic (WHO, 2000). This state of asymptomatic microfilaraemia is associated with high down-regulated immune system, but it is unclear how, when or whether these persons will progress to develop one of the more overt clinical manifestations of filarial disease (WHO, 2000). Another asymptomatic ’presentation' previously termed ‘endemic normals' also exists. Their infections are not defined by microfilaraemia instead by the presence of parasite antigen in the blood (which will disappear after appropriate treatment) (WHO, 2000). This group of patients were recognised recently and both their clinical features and consequence remain to be defined (WHO, 2000). 2.1.5 Clinical diagnosis of Wuchereria bancrofti infection in humans Diagnosis of filarial infection until recently depended on the direct demonstration of the parasite in blood or skin specimens. Alternative methods based on detection of antibodies by immunodiagnostic tests (WHO, 2000) did not prove satisfactory since they both failed to distinguish between active and past infections and had problems with specificity owing to their cross-reactivity with common gastrointestinal parasites and other organisms. Circulating filarial antigen (CFA) detection is now the standard for diagnosing W. bancrofti infections (WHO, 2 0 0 0 ). The specificity of CFA assays is near complete, and the sensitivity is greater than that achievable by the earlier parasite-detection assays. All individuals with microfilaraemia have 15 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh detectable circulating antigen, as well as do a proportion of those individuals with clinical manifestations of filariasis (e.g. lymphoedema or elephantiasis) but with no circulating mf. In addition, some individuals who appear normal also have detectable circulating antigen that disappears after effective treatment with DEC for these cryptic infections (WHO, 2000). Two methods, one based on ELISA yielding semi-quantitative results, and the other based on a simple card (immunochromatographic) test, giving only qualitative (positive/ negative) answers are available (WHO, 2000). 2.1.5.1 Immunological detection of microfilaria Many lymphatic filariasis patients are amicrofilaraemic, and because no serologic test other than detecting CFA is specific, in the absence of antigen testing the diagnoses of these infections must be made clinically with support from antibody or other laboratory assays. The tropical eosinophilia syndrome is the most secure of these clinical diagnoses. In addition to its distinctive clinical presentation such patients have extraordinarily high levels of total serum IgG and IgE depending on the specific tests used. For other amicrofilaraemic syndromes serologic findings based on detecting IgG4 antibodies have proven helpful, since this subclass has greater diagnostic specificity and is stimulated by the presence of active infection (WHO, 2000). Such antibody analyses are also especially helpful in diagnosing the expatriate syndrome' where 'background (i.e. pre-exposure) levels' of IgG and especially IgG4 antibodies to filarial antigens will be very low, so that elevated levels have significant diagnostic implications in association with the clinical presentations. Eosinophilia is a frequent concomitant of all filarial syndromes, but they are diagnostically helpful only when the levels are extremely high. 16 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.1.5.2 Morphological detection of microfilaria Prior to the development of the CFA assay, detection of mf in blood was the standard approach to diagnosing lymphatic filarial infection. It is still the one required today for situations where antigen detection test is not available for bancroftian filariasis. The simplest technique for examining blood or other fluids (including hydrocoele fluid, articular effusions and urine) is to spread 20jnl evenly over a clean slide, dried and then stained with Giemsa or a similar stain (Mak, 1989). A wet smear may also be made by diluting 20-40 \il of anti­ coagulated blood with water or 2% saponin, which lyses the red blood cells but allow the mf to remain motile and thus more readily identifiable (Mak, 1989). One must take into account the parasites’ possible nocturnal periodicity in selecting the optimal blood drawing time (2 2 0 0 - 0 2 0 0 hrs) for such assessments. The larger the blood volumes examined, the likelihood of detecting low parasitaemia will be greater. Knott’s concentration technique has been used to examine 1ml volumes of anti­ coagulated blood by mixing the blood with 1 0ml of 2% formalin, centrifuging the preparation and examining the sediment either unstained or fixed and stained (Mak, 1989). The mfs are non-motile, generally straight and can be easily missed if the viscous sediment is not searched diligently. Membrane filtration has been advanced as the most sensitive technique for detecting and quantifying mf in blood, urine or other body fluids (Mak, 1989). Polycarbonate (Nuclepore) filters with a 3 \xm pore size has proved most satisfactory. A known volume of anti-coagulated blood or other fluid is passed through a Swinnex holder containing the filter, followed by a large volume (about 3 5ml) of pre-filtered water that lyses the red blood cells. A volume of air then follows the water, and the filter is removed, placed 17 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh on a slide and stained. Morphology of the parasite is much more difficult to assess than when specimens are prepared initially on slides, but detection and quantification are very straightforward. 2.1.5.3 Molecular detection of microfilaria The advent of new molecular biological techniques such as DNA probes, PCR have provided the opportunity for improved diagnosis of lymphatic filarial parasites. The PCR assay is very sensitive even in cases of low-level infections because amplification process is exponential. It may also be possible with PCR to detect circulating parasite DNA liberated from host- destroyed mf or from adult worms. Zhong et al. (1996) reported that the Sspl PCR assay for W. bancrofti DNA detection was developed and was first tested on blood samples collected in French Polynesia (Williams et al., 1996), India (McCarthy et al., 1996) and Egypt (Ramzy et al., 1997). This was after the first PCR-based assay designed to detect DNA from a human filarial parasite (B. malayi) was developed (Lizotte et al., 1994). This Sspl PCR assay was adopted, improved and field-tested on pools of field-collected mosquitoes (Ramzy et al., 1997). Other laboratories have been successful in adapting the PCR-based assay for mosquitoes, in a number of different field situations since then (Nicolas and Plichart, 1997; Fischer et a l 1999; Bockarie et al., 2000; Farid et a l 2001; Hoti et al., 2001; Kamal et al., 2001). The specific protocols used by these investigators somewhat differed and standardization was clearly needed to move this technique from the realm of research into a routine monitoring tool for LF control efforts. The feasibility of this goal was supported by the highly successful screening of blackflies in 18 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh the countries covered by the Onchocerciasis Control Programme (OCP) in West Africa, where the PCR-based detection of onchocercal larvae is now a routinely used and has been found to be a very reliable monitoring tool (Yameogo et al., 1999). The detection of W. bancrofti in mosquitoes with this PCR-based assay has two principal roles; the xenomonitoring of microfilaraemia during LF-elimination programme and determining the absence of infection in a defined region or country (particularly for certifying that a country had successfully eliminated LF) (WHO, 2000). With respect to xenomonitoring, the PCR-based approach to identifying infection in a community has the particular advantage of a ‘real-time’ assessment of the transmission of infection. Antigen and antibody tests only give a positive result many months post-infection and therefore the results of such tests reflect the state of filarial transmission at a much earlier time point (Helmy, et al., 2004). Compared with mosquito dissection, the potential of the PCR-based assays to screen pools up to 40 mosquitoes/ tube and 30 tubes/ run (i.e. up to 1 2 0 0 mosquitoes/ run) will prove particularly valuable when the prevalence of infection in the mosquitoes falls to levels below 1%. The ability to screen such large numbers of mosquitoes rapidly is also clearly advantageous in determining the reductions to levels below 1% and the absence of infection in a defined region or country, following the completion of an LF-elimination programme. Dissection is an inexpensive method but requires dedicated personnel trained in the identification of larvae in dissected mosquitoes, and becomes increasingly inefficient as prevalence of infection in the vector population decreases. Both dissection and PCR-based methods are employed as surveillance tools at the beginning of 19 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh eradication programme, with PCR taking over as the primary screening tool as transmission level declines (Helmy et a l, 2004). 2.1.5.4 Detection of lymphatic filarial infection by X-ray Conventional X-rays are rarely helpful in diagnosing lymphatic filarial infection, except in the case of tropical eosinophilia where the picture can vary but characteristically includes interstitial thickening and diffuse nodular mottling in the lung fields (Fox et a l, 2005). Ultrasound examination of the lymphatic (especially scrotal lymphatic in men, and the breast and retro-peritoneal lymphatic in women) can reveal rapidly moving adult worms, and though not diagnostic of filarial infection lymphoscintigraphy can identify lymphatic functional and gross anatomical abnormalities (Fox et al., 2005). 2.1.6 Prevention of the disease Filarial infection is acquired only from vector-borne infective larvae. Prevention of infection can therefore be achieved either by decreasing contact between humans and vectors or by decreasing the amount of infection the vector can acquire, by treating the human host. Individually, contact with infected mosquitoes can be decreased through the use of personal repellents, bednets or insecticide-impregnated materials. Alternatively, suggestive evidence from animal models and some limited experience in human populations indicate that a prophylactic regimen of DEC ( 6 mg/ kg per day x 2 days each month) could be effective in preventing the acquisition of infection (Shenoy et a l , 1998; Ramaiah et a l , 2003). 20 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Efforts at filariasis control through reducing the numbers of mosquito vectors have been difficult as mosquitoes have high fecundity rate and large range of breeding sites. Even when good mosquito control are put in place, the long life-span of the parasite (4-8 years) means that the infection remains in the community for a long period of time, generally longer than intensive vector control efforts can be sustained. More recently, with the advent of extremely effective single-dose, once-yearly, 2 -drug treatment regimens (selecting among albendazole and either ivermectin or DEC). An initiative has been launched through the World Health Organization to utilize a strategy of yearly mass treatment to all population at risk by decreasing mf load in endemic communities thereby interrupting transmission and preventing infection permanently, particularly if the vectors are anopheline mosquitoes to eliminate lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem (Webber, 1991; Southgate and Bryan, 1992; Bockarie et al., 1998). This strategy is based on the assumption that if mf reservoir in the human host can be reduced to below a certain threshold, the transmission of W. bancrofti by anopheline vectors will be interrupted. Southgate and Bryan (1992) reported that Anopheles appears to produce infection and disease much more effectively than Culex and Aedes transmitting yet observed that Mansonia, Culex and Aedes species vectors ingest and develop low-density m f readily as against Anopheles species because they exhibit limitation or proportionality. Facilitation has been advocated as being responsible for the possible elimination of anopheline-transmitted filariasis but Southgate and Bryan (1992) observed facilitation in An. gambiae s.s and An. arabiensis and not in An. melas in Gambia or An. merus in Tanzania. 21 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.1.7 Treatment of the disease Advances in treating lymphatic filariasis have been achieved, but most of these have focussed not on the individual but rather on the community with infection. Thus, the goal has been to reduce microfilaraemia in a community to levels below which successful transmission of infection will not occur. Few clinical trials, however, have focussed on optimizing treatment of the individual patient, so there is little new data arguing for or against a change from the earlier recommended treatment regimens of DEC ( 6 mg/ kg per day) for 12 days in bancroftian filariasis and for six days in brugian filariasis. These regimens repeated at 1-6 monthly intervals if necessary, or even the administration of DEC (6 - 8 mg/kg per day) for 2 days each month for over a period of about 5-6 years is appropriate for treating lymphatic filariasis (Shenoy et al., 1998; Ramaiah et al., 2003). Although very effective in decreasing microfilaraemia, ivermectin appears not to kill adult worms (i.e. not macrofilaricidal) and so does not completely cure infection (Dreyer et al., 1995; Plaisier et al., 1999). Albendazole on the other hand can be macrofilaricidal for W. bancrofti if given daily for 2-3 weeks, but optimisation of its usage has not been attempted (Simonsen et a l , 2004), Thus, for treating infection in individual patients single or repeated courses of DEC are still recommended. Since the use of DEC in patients with either onchocerciasis or loasis can be unsafe, it is however important that patients with bancroftian filariasis who live in areas endemic for these other infections be examined for co-infection with these parasites before being treated with DEC. 22 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2.1.8 Management of the disease While it is important to cure the infection itself, management of the infection (particularly the lymphoedema, elephantiasis and hydrocoele) is what is often of greatest concern to the patient. It has now been shown repeatedly that treatment of hydrocoele in communities with either intermittent (monthly, 6 -monthly, yearly) drug administration or steady use of DEC- fortified table/ cooking salt, leads to clinical improvement with decreases in both hydrocoele size and prevalence (Nanda and Ramaiah, 2003). It is also common to find early lymphoedema regressing completely after treatment of an affected patient with DEC (Nanda and Ramaiah, 2003). Larger hydrocoele that do not regress spontaneously in more chronic states or after treatment must be subjected to surgical procedures to drain the fluid and render the tunica vaginalis incapable of trapping and retaining it again. The sclerosing effects of lymphangiography or, often time alone can lead to the cessation of the lymphatic leakage into the renal pelvis collecting system and the urine. Management regimens include twice-daily washing of the affected parts with soap and water, raising the affected limb at night, regularly exercising the affected limb to promote lymph flow, keeping the nails clean, wearing shoes, use of antiseptic or antibiotic creams to treat small wounds or abrasions. These same intensive hygiene efforts and antibiotic ointments can also decrease the frequency of recurrent infection episodes in patients with elephantiasis of the penis or scrotum, but principles of management have not yet been developed for successfully reversing the anatomic distortions caused by the infection (WHO, 2000). Non- invasive management of chyluria relies on nutritional support, especially substitution of fat- 23 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh rich foods by high protein, high fluid diets supplemented where possible with medium chain triglycerides. 2.2 Biology and Life Cycle of Wuchereria bancrofti The life cycle of W bancrofti is shown in Figure 3. Wuchereria bancrofti belongs to the class Nematoda, subclass Secementea, superfamily Filarioidea and family Onchocercidae (Anderson, 1992). When an infective mosquito takes a blood meal, some or all of the L3 enter human host through the surface of the labella on to the skin surface. The L3 enter the human host through the puncture made by the mosquito, as they are unable to penetrate intact skin, and those left on the skin surface in a drop of haemolymph have to enter before it dries out (McGreevy et al., 1974). Only a few L3 manage to enter the skin after a blood meal (Denham and McGreevy, 1977). The L3 migrate to the lymphatic system in human and transform into L4 between 9-14 days after entry. Within 6-12 months they grow into mature adults, which can live in the human host for 4 to 8 years. Female worms measure 80 to 100 mm in length and 0.24 to 0.30 mm in diameter, while the males measure about 40 by 1mm. Adults reside in lymphatic vessels, mate and the viviparous females produce thousands of sheathed mf (Li) measuring 244 to 296 fim by 7.5 to 10 /zm, into lymph circulation. The mf migrates from lymphatic system to circulatory system and has nocturnal periodicity, except in the South Pacific there is absence of marked periodicity (Lardeux and Cheffort, 2001; Hawking et al., 1966; Denham and McGreevy, 1977). Microfilaria numbers fluctuate in the peripheral blood over 24 hours. Nocturnal, periodic worms peak in the peripheral blood from 24 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 2200 to 0200 hours, corresponding with peak mosquito biting. Microfilariae are concentrated in the micro-vessels of deep tissues, mainly the lungs during the day and one of the many theories put forward to account for this interesting behavioural pattern is that oxygen tension plays a role (Edeson et a l , 1957; Hawking et al., 1966; Hawking and Gammage, 1968; Denham and McGreevy, 1977; Mossinger, 1991). If a person is given extra pure oxygen during the night, the microfilariae stay in deep tissues other than accumulating in peripheral circulation. Another suggestion has been that mfs peak in the peripheral blood when humans are inactive (Hawking et al., 1966; Denham and McGreevy, 1977). A mosquito picks mf, during a blood meal and ingested Li stage of m f move to the stomach of the mosquito, lose their sheaths and some of them work their way through the wall of the proventriculus and cardiac portion of the mosquito's midgut and reach the thoracic flight muscles (Christensen et al., 1984). Within 6-10 days of entering the mosquito, Li m f develop into the L2 “sausage” stage in the thoracic muscles. The L2 larvae develop between 11-13 days and moult into third-stage infective larvae (L3) and reach a length of 1.2-1.6 mm. The L3 larvae migrate through the haemocoel to the mosquito's proboscis and when blood meal is taken from another human, the infective L3 emerge and enters the skin via the bite wound to continue the cycle. Unlike malaria parasites that are injected with saliva into the host, infective stage filarial worms actively break out of the proboscis within a drop of haemolymph and must find and enter the puncture wound made by the mosquito, hair follicles, or other abrasions. The transmission of filarial worms is highly inefficient and filarial worm development in the mosquito is not a benign process and may even disable or kill their mosquito host. 25 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Mosquito Stages A Migrate eo head and w mosquito's proboscis A Mosquito lakes ” a Wood meal aCOOA stwO s 1 £ ro a cd VO dMO CO in © N . cooo CN^ oo CO (N O^VS COO inoo KCN O vdoo m vovq com if)rr •ONr- T3OFJ ** 1 ICO CO 1 § H CO *<3 S CO% T 3a po ■g> CD £ o Is e d3 TT3 ;g*■3s VO CO cd CD ? I(D££> < CN 1 cn i ii in i in l mrH cn m +in 03o H + W )o MU J <500 1 < * '■3- X *6 gfX CD CD 00 ** University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh 4.2 Collection and Dissection of Mosquitoes The 564 mosquitoes collected were mostly Anopheles species (62.1%) followed by Mansonia species (32.3%), a few Aedes species (5%) and Culex species (0.7%) (Figure 8 ). The Anopheles caught comprised of 8 8 .6% An. funestus, 9.1% An. gambiae and 2.3% An. pharoensis (Figure 8 ). The 12 volunteers who participated in the feeding experiments carried between 1 and 59 mf/ 100fil blood, with a geometric mean intensity of 83.3 mf7 ml blood. It was observed that the peak period of the parasites in peripheral blood coincided with the peak biting rates of the Anopheles mosquitoes around 00:00 and 03:00 hours GMT (Figure 9). In all, 32% of Anopheles, 50% Culex, 7% Aedes and 41.8% Mansonia were engorged with blood (Tables 4 and 5). Six mosquitoes each of Anopheles and Mansonia dissected immediately were found infected. There were a total of 47 Li out of which 35 (74.5%) and 12 (25.5%) were found in Anopheles and Mansonia respectively. All the infected mosquitoes were among those dissected within five days after feeding, and as such no L3 was found. Among the Anopheles infected four (1.3%) were An. funestus and two (6.3%) were An. gambiae, while no infection was found in An. pharoensis with 31.6%, 37.5% and 25% engorged with blood respectively. Entomological parameters (Table 6 ) such as infection rates were found to be 0.02 and 0.03 for Anopheles and Mansonia respectively. Biting rates were 70, 0.8, 5.6 and 36.4 for Anopheles, Culex, Aedes and Mansonia respectively. Survival rates were 0.48, 5.00 and 0.13 for Anopheles, Aedes and Mansonia respectively. Among the Anopheles, infection rates were 0.06 and 0 .0 1 for An. gambiae and An. funestus respectively (Table 7). Biting rates were 6.4, 62 and 1.6 while survival rates were 0.5, 0.47 and 1 respectively for An. gambiae, An. funestus and An. pharoensis. 68 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh No : of m os qu ito es c au gh t 60 Mid-point of mosquito collection hour Figure 8 : Generic composition of of the mosquitoes caught during the feeding experiment 69 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Ge om ea n of mf 7 ml b lo od 120 100 - 80 - 60 - 40 - 20 - t 1 4 - 12 - 10 - 8 - 6 - 4 - 2 & cz> oa -St §■R C+HO i £ *dQJ+Jo 0) CO CO • *-« -73 d^ CD-+-»o ,P3 *3 CD .CD<+-< I (D ,M I iCOO o CD CO CO ’TJ a 8 CO CO CS com CS VO CSr- ooOn CS fS CS or-HmT- OO CSm o rHm CO oV)r> 3^P. ca o H 3A no ph ele s ga m bi ae ,b An op he les f un es tu s, eA no ph ele s ph ar oe ns is University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh Ta bl e 6: Di str ib ut io n of inf ec tio n wi th W uc he re ria ba nc ro fti in the v ar io us m os qu ito sp ec ies c au gh t aft er 13 da ys o f m ai nt en an ce o 8 o ma> »-* 3 8 > Q 1 T—I > oo © m CO t-h © ro o w COO H 3CO CD Ibo Pj PQ <4hO CO g O 00 © vq in vdCO ao■ w o £ S3 COr*- ’■£» O 4-1§ *T3 CO O 'sJ-© o\ COGOC« s g-0)czi as *ca«4Ho aacS £ $ ‘S Cuce 00 OVO OsCO CO oo o 5 § ou o CO in o CO a o■ T—4 a o g CO (tf CO HCD o CO o 3 CO O CN Td cl S oCD CO H +-» ctf 3 B o CO d CO .22 ■ r* oCO n CO o o"5J- o VO om CO AO COr-H T—4 t-H r--4 t-H CN CN vN CN oom oin CN ooo o Ae . sp -M &o GOCD ■ 1—4O M an s CDPhw 2 • 1-H3cr* C u. sp COo 3 An . fu . An . ga . *JL> O0 s 3cr CO 1 o Z iool-H C+5s •g 1.■s CO cd P h Ti me ( G M T) 21 00 -2 20 0 22 00 -2 30 0 23 00 -0 00 0 OOrHoioooo oos1oo o 02 00 -0 30 0 03 00 -0 40 0 04 00 -0 50 0 05 00 -0 60 0 CO University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh (B ) M OS QU IT O D IS SE CT IO N EN TR Y SH EE T Su bj ec t co de Nu m be r of da ys old aft er ca pt ur e Sta ge of mf f ou nd in ab do m en L 3 L2 1—H d Sta ge of mf f ou nd in th or ax L3 L2 iJ Sta ge of m f fou nd in he ad L3 12 Sp p. Lo c. Ti m e N o: