1Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access Scoping review of HIV- related intersectional stigma among sexual and gender minorities in sub- Saharan Africa Debbie Dada ,1,2 Gamji R Abu- Ba’are,3,4 DeAnne Turner,5 Ibrahim Wunpini Mashoud ,6 Francis Owusu- Dampare,7 Amos Apreku,8 Zhao Ni,9 Pascal Djiadeu ,2,10 Gloria Aidoo- Frimpong,3 Edem Yaw Zigah,4 Kate Nyhan ,11 Laura Nyblade,12 LaRon E Nelson1,2 To cite: Dada D, Abu- Ba’are GR, Turner DA, et al. Scoping review of HIV- related intersectional stigma among sexual and gender minorities in sub- Saharan Africa. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2023-078794 ► Prepublication history and additional supplemental material for this paper are available online. To view these files, please visit the journal online (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2023-078794). Received 11 August 2023 Accepted 09 January 2024 For numbered affiliations see end of article. Correspondence to Debbie Dada; debbie. dada@ yale. edu Original research © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re- use permitted under CC BY- NC. No commercial re- use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. ABSTRACT Objectives Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations in sub- Saharan Africa (SSA) are disproportionately impacted by HIV and often face multiple HIV- related stigmas. Addressing these stigmas could reduce SGM HIV vulnerability but little is known about how the stigmas operate and intersect. Intersectional stigma offers a lens for understanding the experiences of stigmatised populations and refers to the synergistic negative health effects of various systems of oppression on individuals with multiple stigmatised identities, behaviours or conditions. This review aims to (1) assess how often and in what ways an intersectional lens is applied in HIV- related stigma research on SGM populations in SSA and (2) understand how intersectional stigma impacts HIV risk in these populations. Design Scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews. Data sources Public health and regional databases were searched in 2020 and 2022. Eligibility criteria Articles in French and English on HIV- related stigma and HIV outcomes among men who have sex with men, women who have sex with women and/or transgender individuals in SSA. Data extraction and synthesis Articles were screened and extracted twice and categorised by use of an intersectional approach. Study designs and stigma types were described quantitatively and findings on intersectional stigma were thematically analysed. Results Of 173 articles on HIV- related stigma among SGM in SSA included in this review, 21 articles (12%) applied an intersectional lens. The most common intersectional stigmas investigated were HIV and same- sex attraction/ behaviour stigma and HIV, same- sex attraction/behaviour and gender non- conformity stigma. Intersectional stigma drivers, facilitators and manifestations were identified across individual, interpersonal, institutional and societal socioecological levels. Intersectional stigma impacts HIV vulnerability by reducing HIV prevention and treatment service uptake, worsening mental health and increasing exposure to HIV risk factors. Conclusion Intersectional approaches are gaining traction in stigma research among SGM in SSA. Future research should prioritise quantitative and mixed methods investigations, diverse populations and intervention evaluation. INTRODUCTION Sub- Saharan Africa (SSA) is home to 65% of people living with HIV despite comprising only 12% of the world’s population as of 2020.1 Around the globe, sexual and gender minorities (SGM) bear a disproportionate burden of HIV and SSA is no exception.2–4 Sexual minorities include individuals who are attracted to or have sexual contact with people of the same gender and gender minorities include individuals whose gender identity or expression is different from their sex assigned at birth.5 In Western and Central Africa, the HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) is 11 times and 8 times that of the general adult population, respec- tively.6 In Eastern and Southern Africa, the prevalence among both MSM and TGW is 2 times the general adult prevalence.6 These statistics highlight the importance of under- standing and addressing the vulnerability to HIV- related morbidity and mortality SGM in SSA face. Robust HIV prevalence estimates among women who have sex with women (WSW) and transgender men (TGM) in SSA are severely limited6–9; however, findings on the prevalence of HIV10 11 and HIV risk behaviours11 12 within these populations glob- ally support the need for investigating the STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY ⇒ Studies published in both English and French were included in the review. ⇒ The review was informed by the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework. ⇒ The review was focused on sub- Saharan Africa, which restricts the generalisability of its findings. ⇒ Searching for eligible articles at multiple time points strengthens the comprehensiveness of the review. on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4199-7102 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-1407 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-6530 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-2303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2024-02-12 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 2 Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access risks of HIV infection and barriers to HIV prevention and care services among WSW and TGM as well. Structural, social and individual factors contribute to the elevated HIV vulnerability among SGM, and stigma plays a key role.13–18 Stigma is a social process involving labelling and stereotyping in the context of power imbal- ances that leads to status loss, discrimination and social inequity.19 20 Stigmas associated with HIV, same- sex sexual attraction or behaviour (SSSAB) and/or gender non- conformity exist on every inhabited continent.21–27 SGM in SSA in particular face heightened vulnerability to stigma and discrimination as consensual same- sex acts are crimi- nalised in over half of SSA countries, representing nearly half of all such nations globally.2 28–30 Stigma has been shown to reduce SGM engagement with HIV services.31 32 Stigma is a key focus of many HIV risk- reduction inter- ventions.33 34 In recent years, researchers have moved to investi- gate how individuals experience multiple stigmas.35–37 Intersectionality describes how social hierarchies of oppression interconnect, creating overlapping systems of disadvantage.38 39 This concept has been applied to the study of stigma in public health contexts and described with evolving terms including layered stigma, double stigma and others.40–45 Inter- sectional stigma, a term coined by Dr. Michele Berger, denotes the synergistic and coconstitutive negative effect on well- being and health produced by over- lapping systems of oppression at the intersection of multiple identities, behaviours or conditions that are stigmatised.26 37 41 46 47 Quantitative studies have found that intersectional HIV stigma, that is, interac- tion effects of HIV stigma and other stigmas, predicts poorer health outcomes among MSM in Asia and North America26 48 49 and qualitative studies have used it to understand health inequities.46 However, there has been limited scholarly attention on SGM in SSA using an intersectional lens. It is imperative that scientific understanding of HIV- related intersectional stigma is shaped by the experiences of SGM in SSA lest externally generated knowledge be uncritically applied to them, resulting in the misinterpretation of their unique perspectives and the development of interventions poorly suited to their unique sociopo- litical contexts. Scholars have outlined a need for research on the experiences of HIV- related intersectional stigma among SGM in SSA,13 14 50 51 particularly of trans- gender persons and WSW,15 52 53 but to date there has been no review of the available literature. This review has two objectives. First, to assess how often and in what ways an intersectional lens is used in research on HIV- related stigma among SGM populations in SSA. Second, to understand how intersectional stigma is conceptualised and experienced as impacting HIV risk in these populations. METHODS A scoping review methodology was employed, of which full details are published elsewhere54 but are described briefly here. This review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews.55 Study eligibility Records included in this review met all of the following criteria: (1) discuss or measure stigma related to HIV status or risk factors; (2) present data on HIV- related outcomes (eg. serostatus or risk factors); (3) present primary or secondary data on MSM, WSW, TGM or TGW; (4) be conducted in a United Nations- designated SSA country56; and (5) be published in English or French after 1991. Exclusions included review papers, confer- ence abstracts and mixed- region data. Grey literature was considered if it presented primary or secondary data analysis. Only studies applying an intersectional approach were comprehensively reviewed, extracted and analysed. Studies were designated as intersectional if they incorpo- rated an intersectional approach to at least some elements of the analysis or presentation of their stigma findings. Studies without an intersectional approach were included for basic review so we could calculate the proportion of research on HIV- related stigma among SGM in SSA using an intersectional approach and distinguish possible trends in the intersectional studies. Search strategy Yale School of Public Health librarian, author KN, searched public health databases Medline (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), and Embase (Ovid); bibliographic data- bases: Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection (as licensed at Yale), and regional databases; Africa- Wide Information (EBSCOhost) and Africa Index Medicus (through Global Index Medicus) in November 2020. The searches in Medline, Global Health, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and Africa Index Medicus were updated in July 2022. Search strategies can be found in online supplemental file 1. Screening, data abstraction and theoretical framework Records were deduplicated and imported into Covidence. Four reviewers screened 50 articles, achieving high inter- rater reliability (Cohen’s kappa of 0.83).57 Titles and abstracts, and then full texts were screened by two indepen- dent reviewers; a third resolved disputes. Data were extracted in duplicate by pairs of reviewers using a standardised form and then combined by consensus.54 For intersectional studies, we abstracted basic information (eg, setting, popula- tion), conceptualisation components (eg, theoretical frame- work), methods and results. Only basic information and stigma type were abstracted for non- intersectional studies. We used thematic content analysis to categorise findings on intersectional stigma. This process was informed by the Health Stigma and Discrimination (HSD) framework, which employs constructs from on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 3Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access socioecological models.58 59 Socioecological models for HIV risk purport that factors across the individual, interpersonal, institutional and societal levels shape HIV vulnerability.59–61 HSD provides a framework for understanding what drives and facilitates stigma, how intersecting stigmas are applied to individuals, how stigma is manifested across socioecological levels (definitions provided in results), and the impacts of stigma on health.58 59 Within HSD, stigma drivers are individually held negative beliefs, facilitators are cultural norms and laws, and manifestations include experiences of stigmatising behaviours as well as antic- ipated, perceived and internalised stigma.59 Stigma marking is the process of applying stigma to individ- uals and resilience is the process of ‘overcoming and resisting stigma’.59 In this review, extracted data on intersectional stigma were reviewed by three authors for key findings and categorised based on HSD constructs. The authors iteratively compared their categorisations and re- read the articles as needed. Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. RESULTS Search results The searches yielded a total of 6972 records, 2086 records were screened and 173 included (figure 1).62 Of these, 21 were intersectional stigma articles, which were compre- hensively reviewed. This review classified seven records14 50 63–67 as fully inter- sectional stigma articles, indicating that the study results or intervention focused predominantly on intersectional stigma. Fourteen articles13 68–80 were partially intersec- tional stigma studies incorporating an intersectional approach to some elements of the analysis or presenta- tion of their findings. We also identified 10 articles81–90 that studied multiple stigmas in a non- intersectional manner and 142 articles4 13 16–18 21 51 52 91–224 that studied one stigma in one population of SGM or studied one stigma in each of multiple populations (eg, SSSAB stigma only among MSM and transgender stigma only among TGW). A summary of each intersectional stigma study (n=21) appears in online supplemental file 2 and a summary of each non- intersectional stigma study (n=152) appears in online supplemental file 3. Approximately one quarter (n=5, 24%) of intersectional studies evaluated an intervention (table 1). MSM were included in over 90% Figure 1 Flow diagram of record selection. on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 4 Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access of all studies. TGM, TGW and other SGM (eg, individ- uals identifying as transgender with no specific gender,14 bisexual,161 etc) comprised a greater proportion of the subjects of the intersectional stigma studies than non- intersectional. Intersectional studies were more likely to have been published recently with 38% published in the last 2 years alone, 2021–2022. Most (62%, n=13) of the intersectional studies were qualitative, a quarter (24%, n=5) were mixed methods while only 14% (n=3) were quantitative. HIV outcomes investigated included HIV status14 15 50 64 66–71 73–75 77 79 service access,14 15 50 63–65 67–76 78 80 viral suppression,15 66 and risk behaviour pertaining to condom usage or trans- actional sex.14 50 65 66 68 73 74 79 80 Two- thirds (n=14) did not explicitly reference a theoretical framework. Of those that did, seven unique frameworks were identified. Four were epidemiological models of the relationship between individuals, their environments, and health risks: socio- ecological model,65 67 minority stress model,66 network- individual- resource model of HIV prevention66 and syndemics theory.14 Three informed intervention devel- opment and/or adaptation: Assessment, Decision, Adap- tation, Production, Topical Experts, Training, Testing,63 67 Positive Health, Dignity and Prevention Framework50 and self- determination theory.66 73 There was variability in how intersectional stigmas were measured or explored in the eight quantitative or mixed methods studies. None of the studies explicitly stated they used a previously validated and published intersec- tional stigma measure. One study combined multiple vali- dated scales for gender non- conformity stigma and HIV stigma.66 Another study used a validated HIV stigma scale Table 1 Characteristics of included studies Study category Intersectional stigma studies Non- intersectional stigma studies Study category Intersectional stigma studies n=21 % n=152 % n=21 % Sexual or gender minority population* Research method MSM 19 90 146 96 Qualitative 13 62 WSW 1 5 14 9 Quantitative 3 14 TGM 2 10 1 1 Mixed methods 5 24 TGW 3 14 10 7 Study design* Other† 4 19 6 4 Cross sectional 19 90 Year Longitudinal 2 10 1996–2000 0 0 1 1 Interventional study 4 19 2001–2005 0 0 5 3 Observational study 17 81 2006–2010 0 0 5 3 Sample size of sexual or gender minority 2011–2015 6 29 40 26 0–50 9 43 2016–2020 7 33 77 51 51–150 4 19 2021–2022 8 38 24 16 150+ 6 29 Region of sub- Saharan Africa Unspecified 2 10 Western 11 52 47 31 HIV outcomes quantitatively assessed or qualitatively described* Eastern 3 14 60 39 HIV Status 15 71 Southern 7 33 48 32 Access to HIV prevention or care services 18 86 Central 0 0 7 5 Viral suppression 2 10 Setting Condom usage 8 38 Urban 15 71 100 66 Transactional sex (provision or patronage) 4 19 Rural 0 0 9 6 Both 3 14 21 14 Other or unknown 3 14 22 14 *Columns sum to greater than 100% because more than one option is possible. †Other: unspecified or other sexual and/or gender minorities. MSM, men who have sex with men; TGM, transgender men; TGW, transgender women; WSM, women who have sex with women. on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 5Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access and investigated other stigmas qualitatively.74 Four studies adapted or developed their own scales for measuring SSSAB and/or gender non- conformity stigma and investi- gated additional stigmas qualitatively.15 67 77 79 Two mixed methods studies only investigated stigma qualitatively (and focused quantitative analyses on HIV status, risk, and behaviour).68 76 Types of stigmas described Twelve per cent (n=21) of all 173 articles investigating HIV and stigma among SGM in SSA did so in an inter- sectional manner. Stigma associated with gender expres- sion was categorised as transgender stigma among transgender populations and as gender non- conformity stigma among cisgender populations and populations of mixed or unknown gender identity. The most studied intersectional stigmas were HIV status and SSSAB and HIV status, SSSAB and gender non- conformity (table 2). Other intersectional stigmas investigated were SSSAB and gender non- conformity; SSSAB and transgender identity; HIV status and gender non- conformity; HIV status, SSSAB and transgender identity (and sex work). Most articles (87%, n=152) did not use an intersectional lens; of these, 94% (n=142) investigated 1 stigma and 6% (n=10) investigated 2 or more stigmas. The frequency in which different stigmas were investigated together and the number of articles investigating each stigma is repre- sented in figure 2.225 The most investigated stigma was SSSAB followed by HIV status, gender non- conformity, transgender iden- tity and sex work (figure 2). Non- intersectional studies predominantly focus on SSSAB stigma (86%), with minimal attention to others like HIV (20%) and gender non- conformity stigma (1%). Intersectional studies exhibited a broader scope, extensively investigating HIV stigma (86%), gender non- conformity (48%) and other attributes. This suggests intersectional investigations give us greater insight into how less- studied stigmas impact HIV vulnerability among SGM in SSA. Thematic analysis of intersectional stigma studies revealed seven themes (box 1). Table 2 Summary of stigmas described Study category Intersectional stigma studies Non- intersectional stigma studies n=21 % n=152 % Combinations of stigmatised attributes HIV + same sex attraction/behaviour 7 33 8 5 HIV + same sex attraction/behaviour + gender non- conformity 7 33 2 1 Same- sex attraction/behaviour + gender non- conformity 2 10 0 0 Same- sex attraction/behaviour + transgender identity 2 10 0 0 HIV + gender non- conformity 1 5 0 0 HIV + same sex attraction/behaviour + transgender identity 1 5 0 0 HIV + same sex attraction/behaviour + transgender identity + sex work 1 5 0 0 Individual stigmatised attributes* Same- sex attraction/behaviour 20 95 130 86 HIV 18 86 31 20 Gender non- conformity 10 48 2 1 Transgender identity 3 14 3 2 Sex worker 1 5 0 0 Socioecological levels of stigma*† Individual (internalised or anticipated) ‡ 20 95 Interpersonal § 17 81 Institutional/organizational ¶ 17 81 Societal ** 16 76 *Columns sum to greater than 100% because more than one option is possible. †Socioecological levels were defined based on the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework (50). ‡When an individual internalises publicly held negative beliefs about an identity, behaviour or health condition, and applies these beliefs to themself or when an individual anticipates, fears and perceives negative attitudes or discrimination will be directed at them from others in the future. §When members of the public direct stigma towards individuals. ¶When practices in institutions actively disadvantage a stigmatised group or members of an institution actively disadvantage a stigmatised group. **When cultural and political structures, including public policy and law, disadvantage a stigmatised group. on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 6 Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access Intersectional stigma drivers and facilitators Drivers and facilitators of HIV- related intersectional stigma include cultural norms on gender and sexuality, religious beliefs, misconceptions on HIV transmission and laws, such as the criminalisation of SSSAB. Community members, including healthcare workers, and friends and family of SGM often view SGM as cultural and/or religious deviants because SSSAB, gender non- conformity and transgender identities are deemed sinful, immoral, inap- propriate and/or foreign practices.63 67 69 70 73–75 80 Many healthcare workers and members of the public perceive SSSAB and non- conforming gender expression as a choice that SGM individuals should be counselled or coerced away from making.67 69 73 74 80 Some also believed SGM status to be psychopathology or a result of psycho- pathology.63 67 80 Among community members and some healthcare workers, HIV stigma is driven by inadequate HIV knowledge and misconceptions related to its transmis- sion and clinical progression.50 63 67 75 A driver of combined HIV and SSSAB intersectional stigma among some health workers was the belief that SGM with HIV, particularly MSM, deserved blame for contracting and spreading HIV due to their SSSAB.65 71 75 76 Stigma is facilitated by laws that criminalise SSSAB and institutional norms or policies that fail to protect SGM.50 69 74 80 For example, SGM expe- rienced harassment from law enforcement and felt unsafe reporting violence to law enforcement due to their SGM status because of the criminalisation of SSSAB.50 69 74 Intersectional stigma marking Stigma marking can occur differently across intersections of stigmatised attributes. Disclosure and/or social judge- ment of one’s gender expression are key steps in the stigma marking process for SSSAB, gender non- conformity and transgender identity stigmas. SGM reported experi- encing stigma due to their SGM status either as a result of disclosing their sexual orientation or transgender iden- tity, or as a result of their identity or orientation being assumed based on their gender expression.14 67 70 71 74 78 80 SGM and providers explained that MSM who are gender non- conforming in their dress and mannerisms are more likely to be subject to verbal and physical harassment and abuse from community members and poor treatment from healthcare workers than MSM who are gender conforming.67 70 78 Intersectional stigma experiences Intersectional stigma is manifested at all socioecological levels including from friends and family, and at health- care facilities and it is conceptualised as synergistic. SGM experience stigma intrapersonally, within interpersonal relationships, from institutions and on the societal level. Figure 2 Network visualisation of stigmatised attributes. This illustrates the relationships between stigmas and the frequency in which their intersections are studied. The nodes in this figure represent stigmatised attributes and the size of each node represents the number of articles in the scoping review that focus on the stigmatised attribute. The width of the links represents the number of articles that analyze the intersection between the two stigmatised attributes. on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 7Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access SGM with and without HIV reported internalising nega- tive/stigmatising views about their gender and sexual identities and anticipating maltreatment based on their seropositive status and/or SGM status. On the interper- sonal level, stigma manifestations range from gossip, exclusion, verbal and physical harassment to violence and abuse.14 50 63 66–69 71 73 74 76–80 SGM are rejected by family members and evicted from their homes.50 63 68 73 74 77 They can experience ostracisation from friends when their SGM or seropositive status is made known.50 63 63 65 73–75 77 SGM report experiencing physical abuse, victimisation and threats of violence from family, friends, community members and police officers due to their SGM status and are aware of other SGM experiencing physical violence up to and including murder.50 66 69 TGM, WSW and other SGM reported being targeted for ‘corrective rape’ motivated by stigma, sometimes resulting in HIV infec- tion.14 74 77 79 In healthcare settings, especially public and government- owned clinics, SGM face harassment, delays and refusal of care from providers.14 66 67 70 Healthcare workers engage in medically unnecessary intrusive ques- tioning and attempt to pressure SGM away from SSSAB using Christian or Islamic religious teachings.67–70 73 75 80 Police have been reported to harass SGM due to SGM status as well as engagement in sex work.14 69 SGM also described how societal- level stigmatisation including crim- inalisation, and discrimination (eg, in employment and housing) increased their vulnerability to economic inse- curity.50 65 74 Some SGM experiencing economic margin- alisation engaged in transactional sex to meet their basic needs, which puts them at elevated risk of HIV.14 74 Investigations into how SGM conceptualise and report the comparative experiences of stigma between groups with a single versus multiple stigmatised attributes reveal the synergistic and co- constitutive nature of intersec- tional stigmas. In Southern Africa, MSM living with HIV described a HIV diagnosis as a ‘double whammy’, resulting in ‘greater feelings of internalised AIDS stigma’ as ‘compared with heterosexual experiences’ of the disease.64 65 78 SSSAB stigma modified and exacerbated their experience of HIV stigma. MSM living with HIV also experienced intragroup stigmatisation within MSM peer networks.64 65 78 They experience reduced social support Box 1 Continued Resilience in stigmatising environments 7. Social support and friendly providers help SGM cope and improve linkage with health services a. SGM disclose SGM status and serostatus when they anticipate a positive response b. Some SGM prefer non- profit- run and/or SGM- focused clin- ics to government facilities because providers tend to be less stigmatising c. Social support and access to safe spaces can mediate impact of intersectional stigma Box 1 Key themes Intersectional stigma drivers and facilitators 1. Drivers and facilitators of HIV- related intersectional stigma include: a. Cultural norms and religious beliefs on gender and sexuality that deem sexual and gender minorities (SGM) immoral or sinful and/ or blame SGM for HIV b. Discriminatory laws and policies such as the criminalisation of same- sex sexual behaviour c. Misconceptions on HIV transmission Intersectional stigma marking 2. Stigma marking can occur differently across intersections of stig- matised attributes. a. SGM experience stigma after their sexual orientation or trans- gender identity is disclosed, or after their SGM status is assumed based on their gender expression Intersectional stigma experiences 3. Intersectional stigma is manifested at all socioecological levels in- cluding from friends and family, and at healthcare facilities and it is conceptualised as synergistic a. Individual: SGM internalise and anticipate maltreatment based on stigmatised identities and behaviours b. Interpersonal: stigma manifests interpersonally through gossip, social exclusion, family rejection, verbal harassment, sexual as- sault and physical violence c. Institutional: within healthcare institutions, SGM experience har- assment, delays in care, refusal of care and religious rebukes from providers d. Structural: criminalisation of same- sex sexual behaviour facili- tates harassment by law enforcement and community members e. Transgender identity stigma can intensify enacted sexual attrac- tion/behaviour stigma among TGW, sexual behaviour stigma can intensify internalised HIV stigma among MSM living with HIV, and gender non- conformity stigma can intensify anticipated and en- acted sexual behaviour stigma among MSM f. HIV stigma is internalised on the individual level and manifested in friend networks differently among MSM living with HIV and men who have sex with women living with HIV Intersectional stigma outcomes on HIV and mental health 4. Anticipated stigma leads SGM to hide stigmatised identities and behaviours from healthcare workers, friends, family and the public a. Non- disclosure of SGM identity in fear of discrimination, breach- es of confidentiality and rejection is extremely common b. SGM self- monitor their gender expression to be more culturally- conforming c. SGM with HIV hide their medication from household members, family and friends 5. Intersectional stigma poses barriers to SGM accessing and seeking HIV and sexual health- related care a. SGM commonly delay, avoid and/or withdraw from HIV counsel- ling/testing services or treatment due to stigma b. Disclosing same- sex sexual behaviour can result in name- calling and blame for contracting HIV from providers c. Some SGM conceal relevant health information from providers to avoid inadvertent disclosure of their SGM status 6. Internalised intersectional stigma can lead to adverse mental health outcomes, including: a. Feelings of isolation, guilt, shame and disappointment b. Vulnerability to depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation Continued on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 8 Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access and avoid picking up antiretroviral therapy out of fear of gossip and social exclusion specifically from other MSM.64 65 78 A study using an intercategorical approach to investigate the intersectionality of sexual behaviour stigma across trans and cisgender identities found that TGW were more likely to report exclusion, harassment, and poor treatment due to their having sex with men than cisgender MSM.79 The presence of an additional stigma- tised identity can transform the conceptualisation and experience of other stigmas such that the intensity and nature of the resultant stigma is more than the simple addition of multiple stigmas. Intersectional stigma outcomes on HIV and mental health Anticipated stigma leads SGM to hide stigmatised identi- ties and behaviors from healthcare workers and commu- nity members. A prominent theme across studies was the concealment of SGM identity, HIV status and sex worker status to reduce the likelihood of encountering stigma. Many SGM prefer to conceal their SGM status and HIV status from healthcare providers due to fears of discrimi- nation, delay/denial of care, being reported to the police and breaches of confidentiality.50 63 65 67 69–71 74 76–78 80 SGM commonly hide their HIV status and SGM status from household members, family and friends due to fear of exclusion and maltreatment.71 80 SGM, especially men, feel pressured to behave in ways considered consistent with cultural gender norms to be treated fairly and to protect their safety, and describe vigilant self- monitoring to adjust their gender expression based on the social context.63 67 77 78 80 For example, MSM described feeling ‘forced’ to engage in concurrent sexual relationships with or marriage to women to keep their sexual orientation clandestine and/or to fulfil cultural gender expectations, which can increase their vulnerability to HIV.14 50 Intersectional stigma poses barriers to SGM accessing and seeking HIV and sexual health- related care. SGM commonly reported stigma as a motivation for avoiding or delaying HIV testing14 50 65 71 73–75 78 80 and partner testing.50 At healthcare facilities, SGM reported some- times concealing relevant health information pertaining to stigmatised identities from healthcare workers due to fear of their SGM status being discovered.50 65 69 74 78 80 For example, MSM did not disclose symptoms of sexually transmitted infections affecting the anus or experiences of rape to healthcare providers, hence self- medicate or avoid healthcare. SGM living with HIV hide medication or withdraw from care due to stigma.50 65 69 71 73 They also travel long distances to seek care in areas they are not known to avoid being discovered by friends or family.50 69 73 Internalised intersectional stigma can lead to adverse mental health outcomes. SGM in SSA may internalise publicly held negative beliefs about their gender and/ or sexual identity and develop feelings of guilt, shame, isolation and disappointment in themselves and the people around them.14 50 63 65 70 72–74 76 This is especially true for SGM living with HIV. As a result of stigmatisa- tion, devaluation and discrimination, many SGM in SSA experience stress, depression, anxiety and poor mental health.50 65 77 Internalising intersectional stigma can also increase vulnerability to suicidal ideation and suicide.14 50 73 SGM sometimes turn to behaviours that increase their vulnerability to HIV to cope with the nega- tive impacts on mental well- being stemming from stigma such as substance abuse and transactional sex.14 50 Resilience in stigmatising environments Social support and friendly providers help SGM cope with unsupportive environments and are associated with increased willingness to seek sexual health services. Despite the reported intersectional stigma, researchers also found instances where SGM have been able to confide in healthcare workers, friends and relatives concerning their gender identity, SSSAB and/or HIV status.50 63 71 73 78 80 Disclosure is conditioned on antic- ipation of positive reception, support and confidenti- ality. Some have been able to disclose to their healthcare providers and relatives and have received affirmation and support.50 63 66 70 71 73 78 80 A difference in comfort disclosing across facility types was also noted, with some avoiding disclosure at public facilities fearing confiden- tiality breaches. Instead, they prefer to disclose at non- profit facilities, particularly facilities focused on meeting the needs of SGM, because of the friendliness and non- stigmatising approach of providers, knowledgeability of SGM needs, and confidentiality.63 69 70 73 78 80 Healthy social support and access to safe spaces were found to mediate some of the negative impacts of intersectional stigma on well- being and healthcare seeking.66 68 70 77 DISCUSSION This review explored the use of an intersectional approach in HIV- related stigma research and the impact of intersectional stigma on MSM, WSW, TGM and TGW in SSA. Of all studies reviewed, relatively few employed an intersectional lens or included non- MSM SGM popu- lations. The intersectional studies were primarily obser- vational and qualitative and they explored stigmas less commonly studied in the non- intersectional studies, such as gender non- conformity and transgender stigma. Inter- sectional stigmas associated with HIV, SSSAB, gender non- conformity, transgender identity and sex work operate at individual, interpersonal, institutional and societal socioecological levels. This review provided insight into the diverse ways that HIV- related stigmas intersect in the lives of SGM in SSA. The intersectional stigmas most frequently studied were HIV and SSSAB stigma and HIV, SSSAB and gender non- conformity stigma. Stigma drivers include religious beliefs, cultural gender norms and blame for SGM living with HIV, while laws criminalising SSSAB facilitate stigma. Judgement of gender expression and disclosure of SGM status enable stigma marking. Gender non- conformity stigma increases the intensity and likelihood of experiencing SSSAB stigma, especially for MSM and in healthcare settings. Transgender identity on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 9Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access stigma can intensify enacted SSSAB stigma among TGW and SSSAB stigma can intensify internalised HIV stigma among MSM living with HIV. The layering of additional stigmas can decrease access to social support, which is important for coping, especially among SGM living with HIV. Anticipated stigma leads SGM to delay and avoid HIV testing and to conceal their SGM status from healthcare workers and community members . Internalised stigma worsens mental health and increases vulnerability to HIV risk factors. However, social support and friendly health- care providers help SGM cope and improve their health- seeking behaviour. Thus, intersectional stigma among SGM in SSA forms an important area for further research and an impactful domain for intervention development. This review highlights associations between experi- encing intersectional stigma and poorer HIV- related health outcomes and behaviours (eg, HIV testing). This is consistent with the HSD framework which asserts that the process of stigma marking enables the drivers and facil- itators of stigma to produce negative health outcomes among stigmatised populations. This is also in accord with findings on intersectional stigma’s negative impact among MSM and women in North America, Asia and Europe.32 226–228 This review highlighted differences in the experience of stigma and its connection to HIV outcomes across intersections of stigmatised identities and across socioecological levels, highlighting potential key areas of intervention. For example, health- seeking behaviour is poorer at clinics where SGM experience or anticipate stigma so there is a need for institutional- level interven- tions that address drivers and facilitators of HIV and SGM- related stigmas within health facilities. Thus, this review demonstrated the value of intersectional approaches for advancing understanding of stigma and areas in which it can be intervened upon.35 37 We recommend that more public health stigma research among SGM in SSA use an intersectional lens because of its advantages in compre- hensively illuminating their multifaceted experiences. Most intersectional articles in this review documented intersectional stigma above just the individual socioeco- logical level, in fact, even the least commonly studied level of societal stigma was discussed in three- quarters (n=16) of the articles. Bowleg argues that there has been a tendency in intersectional stigma public health research in the USA to privilege overly individualistic conceptualizations of intersectional stigma that focus only on individual- level stigma within populations with multiple stigmatised attributes and this obscures the role of social- structural systems in perpetuating stigma and generating health inequalities.47 The HSD frame- work and the concept of intersectional stigma as put forward by Berger both emphasise how stigmatisation is a process that emerges from and is rooted in inter- locking systems of oppression and therefore cannot be reduced to individual- level stigmatising experiences and behaviours.36 47 58 In such a view, to reduce health inequalities the focus of stigma- reduction efforts must be multilevel interventions that address the social- structural forces in which stigmas are rooted.36 47 58 By using HSD and the socioecological model, this review highlights how intersectional stigma among SGM in SSA is not concep- tualised as only operating on the individual level there- fore underscoring the importance of stigma reduction interventions in this context to move beyond exclusively addressing individual- level stigma. Intersectional articles demonstrated somewhat limited variety in study populations and research methods; over half included only MSM (n=16) and were qualitative (n=13). Nonetheless, they were more likely to include WSW and transgender indi- viduals than non- intersectional studies. Turan et al argue that mixed method studies are ideal for exam- ining health- related intersectional stigma because they allow quantitative, testable measures to be well- grounded in lived experience.35 37 229 However, there are limited quantitative measurement tools available for HIV- related intersectional stigma as reflected in their relative absence from studies included in this review. 230 Quantitative tools typically measure stigma intracategorically (experience within one multiply stigmatised group) or intercategorically (experience across multiple stigmatised groups).226–228 231 There is a need for more tools to quantitatively measure intersectional stigma intercategorically and intracat- egorically that are validated in low- to- middle income countries in SSA among diverse SGM populations.230 This review is not without limitations. As scoping reviews typically do not assess study quality, a limita- tion is the inclusion of data from weak and strong studies. Our review illustrated the complex relation- ship between gender- expression- related and SSSAB stigmas in different SGM populations. However, there are limits to precision in categorising SGM popula- tions across settings due to differences in language and local interpretation of commonly used terms like transgender. In some settings, sexual orienta- tion, gender identity and sexual positioning are often conceptualised as distinct,66 232 while in others, the boundaries are blurred or non- existent.13 75 77 Further, our focus on SSA restricts the generalisability of find- ings beyond this region. Despite these limitations, the review has several strengths. We included articles in English and French, decreasing selection bias. Our search strategy was comprehensive and conducted in conjunction with an experienced public health librarian. Finally, all screening and extractions were completed by two independent reviewers. To decrease intersectional stigma and improve HIV outcomes among SGM in SSA, there is need for well- tailored interventions, which requires accurate and comprehensive insight on how stigma is conceptual- ised and experienced. While intersectional perspec- tives in HIV stigma research have advanced, more research is needed with diverse designs and SGM populations. Applying these suggestions to future work can improve outcomes for SGM in SSA. on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 10 Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access Author affiliations 1School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA 2St Michael's Hospital Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 3Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA 4Behavioral, Sexual, and Global Health Lab, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA 5University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA 6Medical Division, 37 Military Hospital, Ghana Armed Forces, Accra, Ghana 7Priorities on Rights and Sexual Health, Accra, Ghana 8University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 9School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA 10School of Public Health, University of Toronto Dalla Lana, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 11Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA 12Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA Twitter Ibrahim Wunpini Mashoud @Mashoud_IW and Pascal Djiadeu @DDjiadeu Contributors DD and GRA are co- first authors and guarantors. DD is the corresponding author. GRA, LEN and LN conceived the study. KN, DD and GRA developed the search strategy and identified relevant studies. AA, DD, DT, EYZ, FO- D, GA- F, GRA, IWM, PD, ZN participated in screening and/or extraction of data from included studies, which was led by DD. DD, GRA and EYZ were involved in results collation and table development. DD, GRA and DT drafted the manuscript. DD performed critical revisions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. Funding This study was made possible with funding from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research, Multi- Level Intervention Addressing Intersectional Stigma to Improve HIV Testing in MSM (R01 NR019009). Competing interests None declared. Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Patient consent for publication Not applicable. Ethics approval Not applicable. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer- reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise. Open access This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY- NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non- commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non- commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. ORCID iDs Debbie Dada http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4199-7102 Ibrahim Wunpini Mashoud http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-1407 Pascal Djiadeu http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-6530 Kate Nyhan http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-2303 REFERENCES 1 UNAIDS. Global HIV & AIDS statistics — 2020 fact sheet. 2020. Available: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet [Accessed 14 Mar 2021]. 2 Beyrer C, Baral SD, van Griensven F, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. Lancet 2012;380:367–77. 3 Poteat T, Scheim A, Xavier J, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV infection and related syndemics affecting transgender people. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2016;72:S210–9. 4 Poteat T, Ackerman B, Diouf D, et al. HIV prevalence and behavioral and psychosocial factors among transgender women and cisgender men who have sex with men in 8 African countries: a cross- sectional analysis. PLoS Med 2017;14:e1002422. 5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Terminology | division of adolescent and school health (DASH). 2022. Available: https:// www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/terminology/sexual-and-gender- identity-terms.htm [Accessed 23 Dec 2023]. 6 Kloek M, Bulstra CA, van Noord L, et al. HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men, transgender women and cisgender male sex workers in sub‐Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta‐ analysis. J Int AIDS Soc 2022;25:e26022. 7 Matebeni Z, Reddy V, Sandfort T, et al. "I thought we are safe”: Southern African lesbians’ experiences of living with HIV. Cult Health Sex 2013;15 Suppl:34–47. 8 Poteat T, Logie C, Adams D, et al. Sexual practices, identities and health among women who have sex with women in lesotho - a mixed- methods study. Cult Health Sex 2014;16:120–35. 9 Sandfort TGM, Baumann LRM, Matebeni Z, et al. Forced sexual experiences as risk factor for self- reported HIV infection among Southern African lesbian and bisexual women. PLoS One 2013;8:e53552. 10 Bezerra ALL, Sorensen W, Rodrigues TB, et al. HIV epidemic among Brazilian women who have sex with women: an ecological study. Front Public Health 2022;10:926560. 11 Tat SA, Marrazzo JM, Graham SM. Women who have sex with women living in Low- and middle- income countries: a systematic review of sexual health and risk behaviors. LGBT Health 2015;2:91–104. 12 Siamisang K, Nkomo B, Kusi K, et al. High- risk behaviors and factors for HIV and sexually transmitted infections among transgender people in gaborone, botswana: results from a national survey. Pan Afr Med J 2022;41:128. 13 Emmanuel G, Folayan M, Undelikwe G, et al. Community perspectives on barriers and challenges to HIV pre- exposure prophylaxis access by men who have sex with men and female sex workers access in Nigeria. BMC Public Health 2020;20:69. 14 Logie CH, Perez- Brumer A, Mothopeng T, et al. Conceptualizing LGBT stigma and associated HIV vulnerabilities among LGBT persons in lesotho. AIDS Behav 2020;24:3462–72. 15 Lyons CE, Olawore O, Turpin G, et al. Intersectional stigmas and HIV- related outcomes among a cohort of key populations enrolled in stigma mitigation interventions in Senegal. AIDS 2020;34:S63–71. 16 Poteat TC, Logie CH, Adams D, et al. Stigma, sexual health, and human rights among women who have sex with women in Lesotho. Reprod Health Matters 2015;23:107–16. 17 Rodriguez- Hart C, Bradley C, German D, et al. The synergistic impact of sexual stigma and psychosocial well- being on HIV testing: a mixed- methods study among Nigerian men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav 2018;22:3905–15. 18 Schwartz SR, Nowak RG, Orazulike I, et al. The immediate Eff Ect of the same- sex marriage prohibition act on stigma, discrimination, and engagement on HIV prevention and treatment services in men who have sex with men in Nigeria: analysis of prospective data from the TRUST cohort. Lancet HIV 2015;2:e299–306. 19 National AIDS Trust. Tackling HIV stigma: what works? 2016. Available: https://www.nat.org.uk/publication/tackling-hiv-stigma- what-works [Accessed 14 Mar 2021]. 20 Pachankis JE, Hatzenbuehler ML, Bränström R, et al. Structural stigma and sexual minority men’s depression and suicidality: a multilevel examination of mechanisms and mobility across 48 countries. J Abnorm Psychol 2021;130:713–26. 21 Guimarães MDC, Kendall C, Magno L, et al. Comparing HIV risk- related behaviors between 2 RDS national samples of MSM in Brazil, 2009 and 2016. Medicine 2018;97:S62–8. 22 Ogunbajo A, Kershaw T, Kushwaha S, et al. Barriers, motivators, and facilitators to engagement in HIV care among HIV- infected Ghanaian men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Behav 2018;22:829–39. 23 Parker CM, Garcia J, Philbin MM, et al. Social risk, stigma and space: key concepts for understanding HIV vulnerability among black men who have sex with men in New York city. Cult Health Sex 2017;19:323–37. 24 Philbin MM, Hirsch JS, Wilson PA, et al. Structural barriers to HIV prevention among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Vietnam: diversity, stigma, and healthcare access. PLOS ONE 2018;13:e0195000. on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from https://twitter.com/Mashoud_IW https://twitter.com/DDjiadeu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4199-7102 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-1407 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-6530 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-2303 https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60821-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002422 https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/terminology/sexual-and-gender-identity-terms.htm https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/terminology/sexual-and-gender-identity-terms.htm https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/terminology/sexual-and-gender-identity-terms.htm http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.26022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.764016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.764016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.841291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053552 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.926560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0124 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.41.128.32430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8195-x http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02917-y http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000002641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.11.020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2191-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(15)00078-8 https://www.nat.org.uk/publication/tackling-hiv-stigma-what-works https://www.nat.org.uk/publication/tackling-hiv-stigma-what-works http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1806-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2016.1216604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195000 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 11Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access 25 Sun S, Pachankis JE, Li X, et al. Addressing minority stress and mental health among men who have sex with men (MSM) in china. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2020;17:35–62. 26 Yang X, Li X, Qiao S, et al. Intersectional stigma and psychosocial well- being among MSM living with HIV in Guangxi. AIDS Care 2020;32:5–13. 27 Ziersch A, Walsh M, Baak M, et al. "It is not an acceptable disease”: a qualitative study of HIV- related stigma and discrimination and impacts on health and wellbeing for people from ethnically diverse backgrounds in Australia. BMC Public Health 2021;21. 28 Stannah J, Soni N, Lam JKS, et al. Trends in HIV testing, the treatment cascade, and HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in Africa: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Lancet HIV 2023;10:e528–42. 29 Stannah J, Dale E, Elmes J, et al. HIV testing and engagement with the HIV treatment cascade among men who have sex with men in Africa: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Lancet HIV 2019;6:e769–87. 30 International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association. Criminalisation of Consensual same- sex sexual acts | ILGA world database. Available: https://database.ilga.org/criminalisation- consensual-same-sex-sexual-acts [Accessed 28 Jan 2023]. 31 Ogunbajo A, Oke T, Jin H, et al. A Syndemic of psychosocial health problems is associated with increased HIV sexual risk among Nigerian gay, Bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). AIDS Care 2020;32:337–42. 32 Babel RA, Wang P, Alessi EJ, et al. HIV risk, and access to HIV prevention and treatment services among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States: a scoping review. AIDS Behav 2021;25:3574–604. 33 Kemp CG, Jarrett BA, Kwon C- S, et al. Implementation science and stigma reduction interventions in Low- and middle- income countries: a systematic review. BMC Med 2019;17:6. 34 Dunbar W, Labat A, Raccurt C, et al. A realist systematic review of stigma reduction interventions for HIV prevention and care continuum outcomes among men who have sex with men. Int J STD AIDS 2020;31:712–23. 35 Jackson- Best F, Edwards N. Stigma and intersectionality: a systematic review of systematic reviews across HIV/AIDS, mental illness, and physical disability. BMC Public Health 2018;18:919. 36 Sievwright KM, Stangl AL, Nyblade L, et al. An expanded definition of Intersectional stigma for public health research and Praxis. Am J Public Health 2022;112:S356–61. 37 Turan JM, Elafros MA, Logie CH, et al. Challenges and opportunities in examining and addressing Intersectional stigma and health. BMC Med 2019;17:7. 38 Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of Antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and Antiracist politics. Univ Chic Leg Forum 1989;140:139–67. 39 Collins PH. Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annu Rev Sociol 2015;41:1–20. 40 Hsieh E, Polo R, Qian HZ, et al. Intersectionality of stigmas and health- related quality of life in people ageing with HIV in China. Lancet Healthy Longev 2022;3:e206–15. 41 Logie CH, James L, Tharao W, et al. HIV, gender, race, sexual orientation, and sex work: a qualitative study of Intersectional stigma experienced by HIV- positive women in Ontario, Canada. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1001124. 42 Rai SS, Peters RMH, Syurina EV, et al. Intersectionality and health- related stigma: insights from experiences of people living with stigmatized health conditions in Indonesia. Int J Equity Health 2020;19:206. 43 Rice WS, Logie CH, Napoles TM, et al. Perceptions of intersectional stigma among diverse women living with HIV in the United States. Soc Sci Med 2018;208:9–17. 44 Dale SK, Ayala G, Logie CH, et al. Addressing HIV- related intersectional stigma and discrimination to improve public health outcomes: an AJPH supplement. Am J Public Health 2022;112:S335–7. 45 Bauer GR. Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Soc Sci Med 2014;110:10–7. 46 Berger MT. Workable sisterhood: the political journey of stigmatized women with HIV/AIDS. In: Workable sisterhood. Princeton University Press, 2010. Available: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/ 10.1515/9781400826384/html 47 Bowleg L. The problem with Intersectional stigma and HIV equity research. Am J Public Health 2022;112:S344–6. 48 Bogart LM, Wagner GJ, Galvan FH, et al. Perceived discrimination and mental health symptoms among black men with HIV. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2011;17:295–302. 49 English D, Rendina HJ, Parsons JT. The effects of intersecting stigma: a longitudinal examination of minority stress, mental health, and substance use among black. Psychol Violence 2018;8:669–79. 50 Kennedy CE, Baral SD, Fielding- Miller R, et al. "They are human beings, they are Swazi”: intersecting stigmas and the positive health, dignity and prevention needs of HIV- positive men who have sex with men in Swaziland. J Int AIDS Soc 2013;16 Suppl 3:18749. 51 Midoun M, Shangani S, Mbete B, et al. How Intersectional constructions of sexuality, culture, and masculinity shape identities and sexual decision- making among men who have sex with men in Coastal Kenya. Cult Health Sex 2016;18:625–38. 52 Alessi EJ, Kahn S, Giwa S, et al. "Those tablets, they are finding an empty stomach”: a qualitative investigation of HIV risk among sexual and gender minority migrants in Cape town, South Africa. Ethn Health 2022;27:800–16. 53 Moran A, Scheim A, Lyons C, et al. Characterizing social cohesion and gender identity as risk determinants of HIV among cisgender men who have sex with men and transgender women in cote D’Ivoire. Ann Epidemiol 2020;42:25–32. 54 Abubakari GM, Dada D, Nur J, et al. Intersectional stigma and its impact on HIV prevention and care among MSM and WSW in sub- Saharan African countries: a protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open 2021;11:e047280. 55 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA- SCR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467–73. 56 WHO. Global health observatory metadata | metadata | UN region - Codelist. Available: https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.metadata. UNREGION?lang=en [Accessed 09 Aug 2022]. 57 Belur J, Tompson L, Thornton A, et al. Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: exploring variation in coder decision- making. Sociol Methods Res 2021;50:837–65. 58 Stangl AL, Earnshaw VA, Logie CH, et al. The health stigma and discrimination framework: a global, crosscutting framework to inform research, intervention development. BMC Med 2019;17. 59 Stangl A, Brady L, Fritz K. STRIVE technical brief: measuring HIV stigma and discrimination. Washington, USA: International Center for Research on Women, 2017. Available: http://strive.lshtm.ac.uk/ system/files/attachments/STRIVE%20Stigma%20Measurement% 20Brief.pdf 60 Baral S, Logie CH, Grosso A, et al. Modified social ecological model: a tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts of HIV epidemics. BMC Public Health 2013;13:482. 61 Mitchell E, Hakim A, Nosi S, et al. A socio- ecological analysis of factors influencing HIV treatment initiation and adherence among key populations in Papua New Guinea. BMC Public Health 2021;21:2003. 62 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. 63 Abubakari GM, Owusu- Dampare F, Ogunbajo A, et al. HIV education, empathy, and empowerment (HIVE3): a peer support intervention for reducing Intersectional stigma as a barrier to HIV testing among men who have sex with men in Ghana. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:24. 64 Cloete A, Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC. Layered stigma and HIV/ AIDS: experiences of men who have sex with men (MSM) in South Africa. In: Stigma, discrimination and living with HIV/AIDS: a cross- cultural perspective. 2013: 259–69. Available: https://www.scopus. com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84917701103&doi=10.1007% 2f978-94-007-6324-1_15&partnerID=40&md5=12a6ad23a313c56c ef1a4db471282979 65 Jobson G, de Swardt G, Rebe K, et al. HIV risk and prevention among men who have sex with men (MSM) in peri- urban townships in Cape town, South Africa. AIDS Behav 2013;17 Suppl 1:S12–22. 66 Nelson LE, Wilton L, Agyarko- Poku T, et al. Predictors of condom use among peer social networks of men who have sex with men in Ghana, West Africa. PLoS One 2015;10:e0115504. 67 Nyblade L, Stockton MA, Saalim K, et al. Using a mixed- methods approach to adapt an HIV stigma reduction to address intersectional stigma faced by men who have sex with men in Ghana. J Int AIDS Soc 2022;25 Suppl 1:e25908. 68 Abubakari GM, Nelson LE, Ogunbajo A, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a culturally grounded group- based HIV prevention programme for men who have sex with men in Ghana. Glob Public Health 2021;16:1028–45. 69 Balogun A, Bissell P, Saddiq M. Negotiating access to the Nigerian healthcare system: the experiences of HIV- positive men who have sex with men. Cult Health Sex 2020;22:233–46. on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11904-019-00479-w http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2020.1739205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10679-y http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00111-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00111-X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30239-5 https://database.ilga.org/criminalisation-consensual-same-sex-sexual-acts https://database.ilga.org/criminalisation-consensual-same-sex-sexual-acts http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2019.1678722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03262-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1237-x http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956462420924984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956462420924984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5861-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306718 http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1246-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1246-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00003-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01318-w http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022 https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400826384/html https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400826384/html http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/vio0000218 http://dx.doi.org/24321112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2015.1102326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2020.1817342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.11.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047280 http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.metadata.UNREGION?lang=en https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.metadata.UNREGION?lang=en http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1271-3 http://strive.lshtm.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/STRIVE%20Stigma%20Measurement%20Brief.pdf http://strive.lshtm.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/STRIVE%20Stigma%20Measurement%20Brief.pdf http://strive.lshtm.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/STRIVE%20Stigma%20Measurement%20Brief.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12077-w http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413103 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84917701103&doi=10.1007%2f978-94-007-6324-1_15&partnerID=40&md5=12a6ad23a313c56cef1a4db471282979 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84917701103&doi=10.1007%2f978-94-007-6324-1_15&partnerID=40&md5=12a6ad23a313c56cef1a4db471282979 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84917701103&doi=10.1007%2f978-94-007-6324-1_15&partnerID=40&md5=12a6ad23a313c56cef1a4db471282979 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84917701103&doi=10.1007%2f978-94-007-6324-1_15&partnerID=40&md5=12a6ad23a313c56cef1a4db471282979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0328-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1832555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1832555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1582802 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 12 Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access 70 Bourne A, Carman M, Kabuti R, et al. Experiences and challenges in sexual health service access among men who have sex with men in Kenya. Global Public Health 2022;17:1626–37. 71 de Villiers L, Thomas A, Jivan D, et al. Stigma and HIV service access among transfeminine and gender diverse women in South Africa - a narrative analysis of longitudinal qualitative data from the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial. BMC Public Health 2020;20:1898. 72 Gu LY, Zhang N, Mayer KH, et al. Autonomy- supportive healthcare climate and HIV- related stigma predict linkage to HIV care in men who have sex with men in Ghana, West Africa. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care 2021;20:232595822097811. 73 Kushwaha S, Lalani Y, Maina G, et al. "But the moment they find out that you are MSM…”: a qualitative investigation of HIV prevention experiences among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ghana’s health care system. BMC Public Health 2017;17:770. 74 Mujugira A, Kasiita V, Bagaya M, et al. "You are not a man”: a multi- method study of trans stigma and risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among trans men in Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc 2021;24:e25860. 75 Ndione AG, Procureur F, Senne J- N, et al. Sexuality- based stigma and access to care: intersecting perspectives between healthcare providers and men who have sex with men in HIV care centres in Senegal. Health Policy Plan 2022;37:587–96. 76 Rispel LC, Metcalf CA, Cloete A, et al. You become afraid to tell them that you are gay: health service utilization by men who have sex with men in South African cities. J Public Health Pol 2011;32:S137–51. 77 Rodriguez- Hart C, Bradley C, German D, et al. "Building that strong energy”: an exploration of stigma coping strategies among sexual and gender minorities in Nigeria. Stigma Health 2023;8:223–31. 78 Stahlman S, Bechtold K, Sweitzer S, et al. Sexual identity stigma and social support among men who have sex with men in Lesotho: a qualitative analysis. Reprod Health Matters 2015;23:127–35. 79 Stahlman S, Liestman B, Ketende S, et al. Characterizing the HIV risks and potential pathways to HIV infection among transgender women in Cote D’Ivoire, togo and Burkina Faso. J Int AIDS Soc 2016;19:3. 80 Wanyenze RK, Musinguzi G, Matovu JKB, et al. "If you tell people that you had sex with a fellow man, it is hard to be helped and treated”: barriers and opportunities for increasing access to HIV services among men who have sex with men in Uganda. PLoS One 2016;11:e0147714. 81 Alio AP, Khoudia A, Thiam MH, et al. They call us Goor- Jigeen: a qualitative exploration of the experiences of senegalese muslim men who have sex with men living with HIV . Cult Health Sex 2022;24:1289–301. 82 Duncan C, Harrison MG, Toldson IA, et al. Social stigma, HIV/ AIDS knowledge, and sexual risk: a cross- cultural analysis. J Appl Biobehav Res 2005;10:1–26. 83 Gamariel F, Isaakidis P, Tarquino IAP, et al. Access to health services for men who have sex with men and transgender women in Beira, Mozambique: a qualitative study. PLOS ONE 2020;15:e0228307. 84 Kendall C, Kerr LRFS, Mota RMS, et al. Population size, HIV, and behavior among MSM in Luanda, Angola: challenges and findings in the first ever HIV and syphilis biological and behavioral survey. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014;66:544–51. 85 Kimani M, Van Der Elst EM, Chirro O, et al. Prep interest and HIV- 1 incidence among MSM and transgender women in Coastal Kenya. Top Antivir Med 2019;26:476s. 86 Maleke K, Daniels J, Lane T, et al. How social stigma sustains the HIV treatment gap for MSM in Mpumalanga, South Africa. Glob Health Promot 2019;26:6–13. 87 Mange T, Henderson N, Lukelelo N. After 25 years of democracy we are still Stigmatised and discriminated against’ healthcare experiences of HIV- positive older black gay men in a Township in South Africa. JPTS 2022;19:87–100. 88 Müller A, Daskilewicz K, Kabwe ML, et al. Experience of and factors associated with violence against sexual and gender minorities in nine African countries: a cross- sectional study. BMC Public Health 2021;21:357. 89 Nakiganda LJ, Bavinton BR, Grulich AE, et al. Social influences on engagement with HIV testing, treatment and care services among men who have sex with men living in rural Uganda. Qual Health Res 2022;32:635–45. 90 Secor AM, Wahome E, Micheni M, et al. Depression, substance abuse and stigma among men who have sex with men in coastal Kenya. AIDS 2015;29:S251–9. 91 Niang CI, Tapsoba P, Weiss E, et al. "It’s raining stones”: stigma, violence and HIV vulnerability among men who have sex with men in Dakar, Senegal. Cult Health Sex 2003;5:499–512. 92 Karuga RN, Njenga SN, Mulwa R, et al. "How I wish this thing was initiated 100 years ago!” willingness to take daily oral pre- exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Kenya. PLoS One 2016;11:e0151716. 93 Duby Z, Nkosi B, Scheibe A, et al. "Scared of going to the clinic”: contextualising Healthcare access for men who have sex with men, female sex workers and people who use drugs in two South African cities. South Afr J HIV Med 2018;19:701. 94 Hassan NR, Swartz L, Kagee A, et al. "There is not a safe space where they can find themselves to be free”: (Un)Safe spaces and the promotion of queer visibilities among township males who have sex with males (MSM) in Cape town, South Africa. Health Place 2018;49:93–100. 95 Sabin LL, Beard J, Agyarko- Poku T, et al. "Too much sex and alcohol”: beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors of male adolescents and young men who have sex with men in Ghana. Open AIDS J 2018;12:69–80. 96 Muzyamba C, Broaddus E, Campbell C. "You cannot eat rights”: a qualitative study of views by Zambian HIV- vulnerable women, youth and MSM on human rights as public health tools. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2015;15:26. 97 Baral S, Adams D, Lebona J, et al. A cross- sectional assessment of population demographics, HIV risks and human rights contexts among men who have sex with men in Lesotho. J Int AIDS Soc 2011;14:36. 98 Wirtz AL, Kamba D, Jumbe V, et al. A qualitative assessment of health seeking practices among and provision practices for men who have sex with men in Malawi. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2014;14:20. 99 Tun W, Pulerwitz J, Shoyemi E, et al. A qualitative study of how stigma influences HIV services for transgender men and women in Nigeria. J Int AIDS Soc 2022;25 Suppl 1:e25933. 100 Zhao Y, Rao A, Wirtz AL, et al. A structural equation model of factors associated with HIV risk behaviors and mental health among men who have sex with men in Malawi. BMC Infect Dis 2020;20:591. 101 Larsson M, Mohamed Shio J, Ross MW, et al. Acting within an increasingly confined space: a qualitative study of sexual behaviours and healthcare needs among men who have sex with men in a provincial Tanzanian city. PLoS One 2017;12:e0183265. 102 Coulaud P- J, Mujimbere G, Nitunga A, et al. An assessment of health interventions required to prevent the transmission of HIV infection among men having sex with men in Bujumbura. J Community Health 2016;41:1033–43. 103 Strömdahl S, Onigbanjo Williams A, Eziefule B, et al. An assessment of stigma and human right violations among men who have sex with men in Abuja, Nigeria. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2019;19:7. 104 LeeVan E, Hu F, Mitchell A, et al. Gender identity, stigma, and sexually transmitted infections in Nigeria. Top Antivir Med 2022;30:318. 105 Magesa DJ, Mtui LJ, Abdul M, et al. Barriers to men who have sex with men attending HIV related health services in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res 2014;16:118–26. 106 Mavhandu- Mudzusi AH, Ganga- Limando M. Being Lesbian, gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) students at a South African rural University: implications for HIV prevention. AJNM 2014;16:125–38. 107 Taegtmeyer M, Davies A, Mwangome M, et al. Challenges in providing counselling to MSM in highly stigmatized contexts: results of a qualitative study from Kenya. PLoS One 2013;8:e64527. 108 The CohMSM Study Group, Coulaud P, Sagaon- Teyssier L, et al. Combined sexual behavioral profiles in HIV- seronegative men who have sex with men in West Africa (Cohmsm ANRS 12324- expertise France). Arch Sex Behav 2020;49:331–45. 109 Brown CA, Grosso AL, Adams D, et al. Characterizing the individual, social, and structural determinants of condom use among men who have sex with men in Swaziland. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2016;32:539–46. 110 Maina G, Strudwick G, Lalani Y, et al. Characterizing the structure and functions of social networks of men who have sex with men in Ghana, West Africa: implications for peer- based HIV prevention. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2018;29:70–82. 111 Coulaud P- J, Sagaon- Teyssier L, Mimi M, et al. Changes in risky sexual Behaviours among West African MSM enrolled in a quarterly HIV testing and counselling prevention programme (Cohmsm ANRS 12324 - expertise France). Sex Transm Infect 2020;96:115–20. 112 Ahaneku H, Ross MW, Nyoni JE, et al. Depression and HIV risk among men who have sex with men in Tanzania. AIDS Care 2016;28:140–7. on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1987501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09942-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325958220978113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325958220978113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4799-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czac010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2011.29 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/sah0000319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.11.017 http://dx.doi.org/27431465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2022.2080273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2005.tb00001.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2005.tb00001.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757975917737509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757975917737509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v19i1-2.1674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10314-w http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10497323211058162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369105031000152715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151716 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v19i1.701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.11.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874613601812010069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-015-0067-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-015-0067-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-2652-14-36 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-14-20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05310-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0187-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0187-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12914-019-0190-x http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v16i2.8 http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/38 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01513-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/AID.2015.0240 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2017.07.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2017.07.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2018-053892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2016.1146207 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 13Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access 113 Stahlman S, Grosso A, Ketende S, et al. Depression and social stigma among MSM in Lesotho: implications for HIV and sexually transmitted infection prevention. AIDS Behav 2015;19:1460–9. 114 Wendi D, Stahlman S, Grosso A, et al. Depressive symptoms and substance use as mediators of stigma affecting men who have sex with men in lesotho: a structural equation modeling approach. Ann Epidemiol 2016;26:551–6. 115 Grosso AL, Ketende SC, Stahlman S, et al. Development and reliability of metrics to characterize types and sources of stigma among men who have sex with men and female sex workers in Togo and Burkina Faso. BMC Infect Dis 2019;19:208. 116 Wiginton JM, Murray SM, Poku O, et al. Disclosure of same- sex practices and experiences of Healthcare stigma among cisgender men who have sex with men in five sub- Saharan African countries. BMC Public Health 2021;21:2206. 117 Kokogho A, Amusu S, Baral SD, et al. Disclosure of same- sex sexual practices to family and healthcare providers by men who have sex with men and transgender women in Nigeria. Arch Sex Behav 2021;50:1665–76. 118 Gichuru E, Kombo B, Mumba N, et al. Engaging religious leaders to support HIV prevention and care for Gays, bisexual men, and other men who have sex with men in Coastal Kenya. Crit Public Health 2018;28:294–305. 119 Ky- Zerbo O, Desclaux A, Kouadio AB, et al. Enthusiasm for introducing and integrating HIV self- testing but doubts about users: a baseline qualitative analysis of key stakeholders. Front Public Health 2021;9:653481. 120 van der Elst EM, Gichuru E, Omar A, et al. Experiences of Kenyan healthcare workers providing services to men who have sex with men: qualitative findings from a sensitivity training programme. J Int AIDS Soc 2013;16 Suppl 3:18741. 121 Sekoni AO, Ayoola OO, Somefun EO. Experiences of social oppression among men who have sex with men in a cosmopolitan city in nigeria. HIV 2014;7:21. 122 Aho J, Hakim A, Vuylsteke B, et al. Exploring risk behaviors and vulnerability for HIV among men who have sex with men in abidjan, cote d’ivoire: poor knowledge, homophobia and sexual violence. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e99591. 123 Shangani S, Naanyu V, Mwangi A, et al. Factors associated with HIV testing among men who have sex with men in Western Kenya: a cross- sectional study. Int J STD AIDS 2017;28:179–87. 124 Kunzweiler CP, Bailey RC, Okall DO, et al. Factors associated with prevalent HIV infection among Kenyan MSM: the ANZA Mapema study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;76:241–9. 125 Kunzweiler CP, Bailey RC, Mehta SD, et al. Factors associated with viral suppression among HIV- positive Kenyan gay and Bisexual men who have sex with men. AIDS Care 2018;30:S76–88. 126 Gumindega GC, Maharaj P. Factors influencing HIV- risk perception among MSM students at a University in Durban, South Africa. Afr J AIDS Res 2021;20:244–53. 127 Pillay D, Stankevitz K, Lanham M, et al. Factors influencing uptake, continuation, and discontinuation of oral prep among clients at sex worker and MSM facilities in South Africa. PLoS ONE 2020;15:e0228620. 128 Wirtz AL, Trapence G, Jumbe V, et al. Feasibility of a combination HIV prevention program for men who have sex with men in Blantyre. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2015;70:155–62. 129 Tadele G, Amde WK. Health needs, health care seeking behaviour, and utilization of health services among lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Equity Health 2019;18. 130 Micheni M, Kombo BK, Secor A, et al. Health provider views on improving antiretroviral therapy adherence among men who have sex with men in Coastal Kenya. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2017;31:113–21. 131 Matovu JKB, Musinguzi G, Kiguli J, et al. Health providers’ experiences, perceptions and readiness to provide HIV services to men who have sex with men and female sex workers in Uganda - a qualitative study. BMC Infect Dis 2019;19:214. 132 Ishungisa AM, Mizinduko M, Likindikoki S, et al. Health services we can trust: how same- sex attracted men in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania would like their HIV healthcare to be organised. Cult Health Sex 2021;23:1329–43. 133 Mbeda C, Ogendo A, Lando R, et al. Healthcare- related stigma among men who have sex with men and transgender women in sub- Saharan Africa participating in HIV prevention trials network (HPTN) 075 study. AIDS Care 2020;32:1052–60. 134 Van der Elst EM, Mbogua J, Operario D, et al. High acceptability of HIV pre- exposure prophylaxis but challenges in adherence and use: qualitative insights from a phase I trial of intermittent and daily prep in at- risk populations in Kenya. AIDS Behav 2013;17:2162–72. 135 Chapman J, Koleros A, Delmont Y, et al. High HIV risk behavior among men who have sex with men in Kigali, Rwanda: making the case for supportive prevention policy. AIDS Care 2011;23:449–55. 136 Anderson AM, Ross MW, Nyoni JE, et al. High prevalence of stigma- related abuse among a sample of men who have sex with men in Tanzania: implications for HIV prevention. AIDS Care 2015;27:63–70. 137 Wirtz AL, Jumbe V, Trapence G, et al. HIV among men who have sex with men in Malawi: elucidating HIV prevalence and correlates of infection to inform HIV prevention. J Int AIDS Soc 2013;16 Suppl 3:18742. 138 Graham SM, Micheni M, Secor A, et al. HIV care engagement and ART adherence among Kenyan gay, Bisexual, and other men who have sex with men: a multi- level model informed by qualitative research. AIDS Care 2018;30:S97–105. 139 Hladik W, Barker J, Ssenkusu JM, et al. HIV infection among men who have sex with men in Kampala, Uganda--a respondent driven sampling survey. PLoS One 2012;7:e38143. 140 Twahirwa Rwema JO, Lyons CE, Herbst S, et al. HIV infection and engagement in HIV care cascade among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Kigali, Rwanda: a cross- sectional study. J Int AIDS Soc 2020;23 Suppl 6:e25604. 141 Sithole B. HIV prevention needs for men who have sex with men in Swaziland. Afr J AIDS Res 2017;16:315–20. 142 Poteat T, Diouf D, Drame FM, et al. HIV risk among MSM in senegal: a qualitative rapid assessment of the impact of enforcing laws that criminalize same sex practices. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e28760. 143 Maleke K, Makhakhe N, Peters RP, et al. HIV risk and prevention among men who have sex with men in rural South Africa. Afr J AIDS Res 2017;16:31–8. 144 Tiamiyu AB, Lawlor J, Hu F, et al. HIV status disclosure by Nigerian men who have sex with men and transgender women living with HIV: a cross- sectional analysis at enrollment into an observational cohort. BMC Public Health 2020;20:1282. 145 Stephenson R, Darbes LA, Chavanduka T, et al. HIV testing, knowledge and willingness to use prep among partnered men who have sex with men in South Africa and Namibia. AIDS Behav 2021;25:1993–2004. 146 Kalamar M, Maharaj P, Gresh A. HIV- prevention interventions targeting men having sex with men in Africa: field experiences from Cameroon. Cult Health Sex 2011;13:1135–49. 147 Nel JA, Yi H, Sandfort TGM, et al. HIV- untested men who have sex with men in South Africa: the perception of not being at risk and fear of being tested. AIDS Behav 2013;17 Suppl 1:S51–9. 148 Grundlingh L. HIV/AIDS in South Africa: a case of failed responses because of Stigmatization, discrimination and morality, 1983- 1994. New Contree 1999;5:55–81. 149 Fiorentino M, Eubanks A, Coulaud P- J, et al. Homonegativity, sexual violence and condom use with women in men who have sex with men and women in West Africa. AIDS 2021;35:681–7. 150 Tucker A, Liht J, de Swardt G, et al. Homophobic stigma, depression, self- efficacy and unprotected anal intercourse for peri- urban Township men who have sex with men in Cape town, South Africa: a cross- sectional association model. AIDS Care 2014;26:882–9. 151 Nyanzi S. Homosexuality, sex work, and HIV/AIDS in displacement and post- conflict settings: the case of refugees in Uganda. Int Peacekeep 2013;20:450–68. 152 King R, Sebyala Z, Ogwal M, et al. How men who have sex with men experience HIV health services in Kampala, Uganda. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5:e001901. 153 Zahn R, Grosso A, Scheibe A, et al. Human rights violations among men who have sex with men in Southern Africa: comparisons between legal contexts. PLoS One 2016;11:e0147156. 154 Dirisu O, Sekoni A, Vu L, et al. 'I will welcome this one 101%, I will so embrace it': a qualitative exploration of the feasibility and acceptability of HIV self- testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Lagos, Nigeria. Health Educ Res 2020;35:524–37. 155 Mavhandu- Mudzusi AH. Impact of stigma and discrimination on sexual wellbeing of Lgbti students in a South African rural University. SAJHE 2017;31:208–18. 156 Mushoriwa TD. Incidence of and experiences in homosexuality among university students: implications for HIV/AIDS prevention. J Hum Ecol 2017;57:53–9. 157 Chen Y- H, Gilmore HJ, Maleke K, et al. Increases in HIV status disclosure and sexual communication between South African men who have sex with men and their partners following use of HIV self- testing kits. AIDS Care 2021;33:1262–9. 158 Cange CW, LeBreton M, Billong S, et al. Influence of stigma and homophobia on mental health and on the uptake of HIV/sexually on M arch 4, 2024 by guest. P rotected by copyright. http://bm jopen.bm j.com / B M J O pen: first published as 10.1136/bm jopen-2023-078794 on 12 F ebruary 2024. D ow nloaded from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1094-y http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.06.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.06.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3693-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12151-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01644-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01644-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1447647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.653481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.653481 http://dx.doi.org/24321109 http://dx.doi.org/24321109 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S72034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956462416638967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2018.1510109 http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2021.1981413 http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2021.1981413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0991-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/apc.2016.0213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3713-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2020.1780316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2020.1776824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0317-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2010.507758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2014.951597 http://dx.doi.org/24321110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2018.1515471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25604 http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2017.1379420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028760 http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2017.1292925 http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2017.1292925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09315-y http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-03129-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2011.607244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0329-4 http://dx.doi.org/22103007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000002782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2013.859652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2013.846136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2013.846136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyaa028 http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/31-4-894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2017.1311656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2017.1311656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2020.1828564 http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ 14 Dada D, et al. BMJ Open 2024;14:e078794. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078794 Open access transmissible infection services for Cameroonian men who have sex with men. Sex Health 2015;12:315–21. 159 Ross MW, Kajubi P, Mandel JS, et al. Internalized homonegativity/ homophobia is associated with HIV- risk behaviours among Ugandan gay and bisexual men. Int J STD AIDS 2013;24:409–13. 160 Muwonge TR, Nsubuga R, Brown C, et al. Knowledge and barriers of prep delivery among diverse groups of potential prep users in central Uganda. PLoS One 2020;15:e0241399. 161 H Logie C, Perez- Brumer A, Jenkinson J, et al. Marginalization and social change processes among Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons in Swaziland: implications for HIV prevention. AIDS Care 2018;30:33–40. 162 Sholeye OO, Animasahun VJ, Oyelekan AA. Medical students’ perception of sexual orientation in sagamu, Southwestern Nigeria: implications for access to HIV care. IJHRH 2018;11:347–55. 163 King R, Barker J, Nakayiwa S, et al. Men at risk; a qualitative study on HIV risk, gender identity and violence among men who have sex with men who report high risk behavior in Kampala, Uganda. PLoS One 2013;8:e82937. 164 Dah TTE, Orne- Gliemann J, Guiard- Schmid JB, et al. Men who have sex with men (MSM) and HIV infection in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: knowledge, attitudes, practices and seroprevalence survey. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2016;64:295–300. 165 Hladik W, Sande E, Berry M, et al. Men who have sex with men in Kampala, Uganda: results from a bio- behavioral respondent driven sampling survey. AIDS Behav 2017;21:1478–90. 166 Okall DO, Ondenge K, Nyambura M, et al. Men who have sex with men in Kisumu, Kenya: comfort in accessing health services and willingness to participate in HIV prevention studies. J Homosex 2014;61:1712–26. 167 Batist E, Brown B, Scheibe A, et al. Outcomes of a community- based HIV- prevention pilot programme for township men who have sex with men in cape town, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc 2013;16 Suppl 3:18754. 168 Rodriguez- Hart C, Nowak RG, Musci R, et al. Pathways from sexual stigma to incident HIV and sexually transmitted infections among Nigerian MSM. AIDS 2017;31:2415–20. 169 Magesa DJ, Leshabari M. Perceived barriers to access available health services among men who have sex with men in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania [unpaginated]. Tanzan J Health Res 2017;19. 170 Kigumi HO, Msuya SE, Damian DJ. Perceived barriers to access available HIV and sexually transmitted infection services among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Tanga region, northern Tanzania. HIV AIDS Rev 2019;18:115–9. 171 Lyons CE, Ketende S, Diouf D, et al. Potential impact of integrated stigma mitigation interventions in improving HIV/AIDS service delivery and uptake for key populations in Senegal. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2017;74:S52–9. 172 Essack Z, Lynch I, Kaunda CJ, et al. Power relations in sexual agreements among male couples in Southern Africa. Cult Health Sex 2020;22:904–19. 173 Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Prevalence and associated factors of enacted, internalized and anticipated stigma among people living with HIV in South Africa: results of the first national survey. HIV AIDS (Auckl) 2019;11:275–85. 174 Ruiseñor- Escudero H, Lyons C, Ketende S, et al. Prevalence and factors associated to disclosure of same- sex practices to family members and health care workers among men who have sex with men in Togo. AIDS Care 2019;31:1019–25. 175 Adebajo SB, Eluwa GI, Allman D, et al. Prevalence of internalized homophobia and HIV associated risks among men who have sex with men in Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health 2012;16:21–8. 176 Lorente N, Henry E, Fugon L, et al. Proximity to HIV is associated with a high rate of HIV testing among men who have sex with men living in douala, Cameroon. AIDS Care 2012;24:1020–7. 177 Ogunbajo A, Iwuagwu S, Williams R, et al. Psychological problems mediate the relationship between minority stress and HIV sexual risk among Nigerian men who have sex with men: testing the minority stress model. Arch Sex Behav 2021;50:3163–74. 178 Pilgrim N, Musheke M, Raymond HF, et al. Quality of care and HIV service utilization among key populations in Zambia: a qualitative comparative analysis among female sex workers, men who have sex with men and people who use drugs. AIDS Care 2019;31:460–4. 179 Parry C, Petersen P, Dewing S, et al. Rapid assessment of drug- related HIV risk among men who have sex with men in three South African cities. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008;95:45–53. 180 Mpunga E, Persaud N, Akolo C, et al. Readiness for use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Malawi: qualitative focus group and interview study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2021;7:e26177. 181 Balogun- Katung A, Bissell P, Saddiq M. Reflections on the use of antiretroviral treatment among HIV+ men who have sex with men (MSM) in Nigeria. In: Living pharmaceutical lives. 2021: 139–53. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0- 85109606153&doi=10.4324%2f9780429342868-10&partnerID=40& md5=180ccadf4206ccd63a46ed75293b23db 182 Kayode BO, Mitchell A, Ndembi N, et al. Retention of a cohort of men who have sex with men and transgender women at risk for and living with HIV in Abuja and Lagos, Nigeria: a longitudinal analysis. J Int AIDS Soc 2020;23 Suppl 6:e25592. 183 Rao A, Stahlman S, Hargreaves J, et al. Sampling key populations for HIV surveillance: results from eight cross- sectional studies using respondent- driven sampling and venue- based snowball sampling. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2017;3:e72. 184 Ochonye B, Folayan MO, Fatusi AO, et al. Satisfaction with use of public health and peer- led facilities for HIV prevention services by key populations in Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res 2019;19:856. 185 Niang CI, Seck K, Tapsoba P, et al. Satisfaire LES Besoins de Sante des hommes qui ont des rapports sexuels avec D’Autres hommes au senegal; 19. 186 Shangani S, Genberg B, Harrison A, et al. Sexual prejudice and comfort to provide services to men who have sex with men among HIV healthcare workers in western Kenya: role of interpersonal contact. AIDS Behav 2022;26:805–13. 187 Risher K, Adams D, Sithole B, et al. Sexual stigma and discrimination as barriers to seeking appropriate healthcare among men who have sex with men in Swaziland. J Int AIDS Soc 2013;16:18715. 188 Rodriguez- H