Abstract:
This study investigates the expression of force-dynamics in Akan (Talmy 2000).
Two main types of causatives can be found in the language, namely non-
periphrastic causatives (lexical causatives and cause-effect SVCs) and periphrastic
causatives (analytic causatives). The study examines the syntactic properties of
causatives and shows that while lexical causatives and cause-effect SVCs involve
a monoclausal structure, the analytic causative displays a complex (bi-clausal)
structure. In Akan, the difference in the coding of the causee argument in analytic
causatives is neither coincidental nor superficial but points to a difference in
syntactic properties and structure. It is argued that the different syntactic marking
of the causee argument in Akan causatives is not predicted by a syntactic case
hierarchy as claimed by Comrie 1976 neither is it motivated by the degree of
agentivity of the causee in the causative interaction as Cole 1983 proposed. Rather,
the alternative marking of the causee is as a result of restructuring of a
complement causative sentence into a partial lexicalised serial verb construction in
the language.
Five event types of causation are identified namely, MANIPULATION, CREATE,
TRIGGER, PROMPT and ALLOW and their properties analysed through Talmy’s
(2000) force-dynamics framework. The notion of direct and indirect causation is
also examined in Akan. It is emphasized that, at least in Akan, it is better to map
event type of causation with the notion of (in)directness of causation because a
single causative expression may involve more than one event type of causation.
