Department of Philosophy and Classics

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://197.255.125.131:4000/handle/123456789/23076

Browse

Filters

20241

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.et al.Subject: search.filters.subject.Bioethicists

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Bioethics’ Duty to Conference in Qatar: Reply to Magnus
    (The American Journal of Bioethics, 2024) Jecker, N.S.; Savulescu, J.; Atuire, C.; et al.
    Is it unethical to host an international bioethics conference in Qatar? In an editorial in this issue, David Magnus (2024) argues that conferencing in Qatar or other places where human rights violations occur, is not ethically justified. According to Magnus, the International Association of Bioethics’ (IABs’) decision to host the 2024 World Congress of Bioethics (WCB) at a Qatari-based university was “a major mistake by the IAB board.” We hold a much different view. In the face of unjust laws and human rights violations, more than one response is ethically defensible, as some of us have argued (Jecker and Ravitsky 2023; Jecker et al. 2024a; Jecker et al. 2024b; Jecker, Verweij, et al. 2023; Ghaly, El Akoum, and Afdhal 2023). Boycotting is one way to seek to change an unjust situation, but so too is engaging with people who are willing to host, hear, and take seriously challenges and objections to their prevailing norms (Jecker, Ravitsky, et al., 2023). Qatari-based hosts have invited bioethicists from around the world to engage with them in an open exchange of ideas, and offered a conference venue where this can occur. Bioethicists should engage and should foster open and respectful dialogue. To avoid redundancy with arguments, some of us have developed elsewhere (Jecker and Ravitsky, 2023; Jecker et al. 2024a; Jecker et al. 2024b; Jecker, Verweij, et al. 2023; Ghaly, El Akoum, and Afdhal 2023), we limit our response mostly to points not considered previously.