Browsing by Author "Ruf, M.T."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Optimized DNA preparation from mycobacteria(Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2010-04) Käser, M.; Ruf, M.T.; Hauser, J.; Pluschke, G.Extraction of genomic DNA from mycobacteria requires special consideration because (i) many mycobacterial species exhibit extremely slow growth, and thus produce only small amounts of starting material, and (ii) a robust and waxy cell wall renders mycobacteria difficult to lyse. Hence, mycobacterial DNA extraction often results in low DNA yields of unsuitable quality. Published protocols for mycobacterial DNA preparations and commercially available extraction kits are mainly designed for the isolation of small amounts of genomic material suitable for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based applications like species identification. However, such DNA quantities and qualities are usually not sufficient for contemporary genomic analyses such as whole genome sequence analysis, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection, or DNA microarrays, or for investigations of bacterial evolution, virulence, or epidemiology on a world-wide population level. Moreover, most protocols that achieve a high standard in DNA recovery typically employ large reaction volumes and thus require milliliter-scale plasticware and centrifugal equipment as well as large amounts of chemicals, all of which are costly both in purchase and disposal. The DNA extraction method described here was established to address the challenges that result from the slow growth and distinct cell wall composition of mycobacteria, and to greatly enhance both yield and purity of mycobacterial DNA preparations in a small extraction volume. Designed to be performed using 1.5-mL reaction tubes and the corresponding equipment, the method is economical and practical, and reliably yields large amounts of pure genomic DNA--increases of at least 10-fold as compared to earlier protocols.Item Secondary Bacterial Infections of Buruli Ulcer Lesions Before and After Chemotherapy with Streptomycin and Rifampicin(Public Library of Science, 2013) Yeboah-Manu, D.; Kpeli, G.S.; Ruf, M.T.; Asan-Ampah, K.; Quenin-Fosu, K.; Owusu-Mireku, E.; Paintsil, A.; Lamptey, I.; Anku, B.; Kwakye-Maclean, C.; Newman, M.; Pluschke, G.Buruli ulcer (BU), caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans is a chronic necrotizing skin disease. It usually starts with a subcutaneous nodule or plaque containing large clusters of extracellular acid-fast bacilli. Surrounding tissue is destroyed by the cytotoxic macrolide toxin mycolactone produced by microcolonies of M. ulcerans. Skin covering the destroyed subcutaneous fat and soft tissue may eventually break down leading to the formation of large ulcers that progress, if untreated, over months and years. Here we have analyzed the bacterial flora of BU lesions of three different groups of patients before, during and after daily treatment with streptomycin and rifampicin for eight weeks (SR8) and determined drug resistance of the bacteria isolated from the lesions. Before SR8 treatment, more than 60% of the examined BU lesions were infected with other bacteria, with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa being the most prominent ones. During treatment, 65% of all lesions were still infected, mainly with P. aeruginosa. After completion of SR8 treatment, still more than 75% of lesions clinically suspected to be infected were microbiologically confirmed as infected, mainly with P. aeruginosa or Proteus miriabilis. Drug susceptibility tests revealed especially for S. aureus a high frequency of resistance to the first line drugs used in Ghana. Our results show that secondary infection of BU lesions is common. This could lead to delayed healing and should therefore be further investigated. © 2013 Yeboah-Manu et al.Item Spatial Distribution of Mycobacterium ulcerans in Buruli Ulcer Lesions: Implications for Laboratory Diagnosis(Public Library of Science, 2016) Ruf, M.T.; Bolz, M.; Vogel, M.; Bayi, B.F.; Bratschi, M.W.; Sopho, G.E.; Yeboah-Manu, D.; Um Boock, A.; Junghanss, T.; Pluschke, G.Current laboratory diagnosis of Buruli ulcer (BU) is based on microscopic detection of acid fast bacilli, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), histopathology or cultivation. Insertion sequence (IS) 2404 qPCR, the most sensitive method, is usually only available at reference laboratories. The only currently available point-of-care test, microscopic detection of acid fast bacilli (AFB), has limited sensitivity and specificity. Methodology/ Principal Findings: Here we analyzed AFB positive tissue samples (n = 83) for the presence, distribution and amount of AFB. AFB were nearly exclusively present in the subcutis with large extracellular clusters being most frequently (67%) found in plaque lesions. In ulcerative lesions small clusters and dispersed AFB were more common. Beside this, 151 swab samples from 37 BU patients were analyzed by IS2404 qPCR and ZN staining in parallel. The amount of M. ulcerans DNA in extracts from swabs correlated well with the probability of finding AFB in direct smear microscopy, with 56.1% of the samples being positive in both methods and 43.9% being positive only in qPCR. By analyzing three swabs per patient instead of one, the probability to have at least one positive swab increased from 80.2% to 97.1% for qPCR and from 45% to 66.1% for AFB smear examination. Conclusion / Significance: Our data show that M. ulcerans bacteria are primarily located in the subcutis of BU lesions, making the retrieval of the deep subcutis mandatory for examination of tissue samples for AFB. When laboratory diagnosis is based on the recommended less invasive collection of swab samples, analysis of three swabs from different areas of ulcerative lesions instead of one increases the sensitivity of both qPCR and of smear microscopy substantially. © 2016 Ruf et al.